*Pages 1--2 from Microsoft Word - 20729.doc* Federal Communications Commission Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 In the matter of Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission’s Rules to make Non- Substantive Revisions to the Table of Frequency Allocations ) ) ) ) ) ERRATUM Adopted: August 15, 2002 Released: August 19, 2002 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: 1. On August 5, 2002, the Commission released an Order, DA 02- 1872, in the above captioned proceeding. This erratum corrects the following minor errors to the Table of Frequency Allocation. (1) In the International Table of Frequency Allocations for the band 71- 74 GHz, change “FIXED-SATELLITE (Earth- to- space)” and “MOBILE- SATELLITE (Earth- to- space)” to “FIXED-SATELLITE (space- to- Earth)” and “MOBILE- SATELLITE (space- to- Earth)”, respectively. (2) In footnotes US373 and US374, change “S5.43” to “5. 43”. (3) Footnote US356 is revised and added to the amendatory text, to read as follows: US356 In the band 13.75- 14 GHz, an earth station in the fixed- satellite service shall have a minimum antenna diameter of 4.5 m and the e. i. r. p. of any emission should be at least 68 dBW and should not exceed 85 dBW. In addition, the e. i. r. p., averaged over one second, radiated by a station in the radiolocation service towards the geostationary-satellite orbit shall not exceed 59 dBW. Receiving space stations in the fixed- satellite service shall not claim protection from radiolocation transmitting stations operating in accordance with the United States Table of Frequency Allocations. ITU Radio Regulations No. 5.43A does not apply. (4) Footnote NG143 is revised and added to the amendatory text, to read as follows: NG143 In the band 11.7- 12.2 GHz, protection from harmful interference shall be afforded to transmissions from space stations not in conformance with ITU Radio Regulation 5.488 only if the operations of such space stations impose no unacceptable constraints on operations or orbit locations of space stations in conformance with 5.488. 1 Federal Communications Commission 2 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this Erratum is issued pursuant to Section 0.241 of the Commission’s rules on delegated authority, 47 C. F. R. § 0.241. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief Office of Engineering and Technology 2