*Pages 1--2 from  Microsoft Word - 29382*
 Federal  Communications  Commission 
 1 
 Before  the  Federal  Communications  Commission 
 Washington,  D.  C.  20554 


 In  the  Matter  of 
 2002  Biennial  Regulatory  Review  –  Review  of  the  Commission’s  Broadcast  Ownership  Rules  and 
 Other  Rules  Adopted  Pursuant  to  Section  202  of  the  Telecommunications  Act  of  1996 


 Cross-  Ownership  of  Broadcast  Stations  and  Newspapers 
 Rules  and  Policies  Concerning  Multiple  Ownership  of  Radio  Broadcast  Stations  in  Local 
 Markets 
 Definition  of  Radio  Markets 


 Definition  of  Radio  Markets  for  Areas  Not  Located  in  an  Arbitron  Survey  Area 


 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 ) 


 MB  Docket  02-  277 
 MM  Docket  01-  235 
 MM  Docket  01-  317 


 MM  Docket  00-  244 
 MB  Docket  No.  03-  130 


 ERRATUM 
 Released:  July  11,  2003 
 By  the  Chief,  Media  Bureau 
 1.  The  Report  and  Order  and  Notice  of  Proposed  Rulemaking  in  the  above-  captioned  proceeding  released  on  July  2,  2003,  FCC  03-  127  has  been  corrected  as  indicated  in  this  Erratum.  The  corrected 
 version  will  be  published  in  the  Federal  Register  and  the  FCC  Record.  In  addition,  the  corrected  version  has  been  posted  on  the  Commission’s  website. 


 2.  Footnote  numbering  and  cross-  references  were  corrected  to  resolve  errors  resulting  from  computer  format  problems,  which  had  caused  some  cross  references  to  be  off  by  between  one  and  three 
 footnote  numbers.  In  addition,  typographical  errors  were  corrected. 
 3.  In  paragraph  464,  the  last  sentence  is  revised  by  changing  the  phrase  “small  markets”  to  “small  to  medium  markets.”  The  sentence  now  reads  as  follows:  “The  potential  for  rapid  concentration 
 that  may  result  from  a  combination  of  a  newspaper  with  a  television  duopoly  in  markets  with  between  four  and  eight  licensed  television  stations  (“  small  to  medium  markets”)  leads  us  to  conclude  that  it  would 
 be  prudent,  in  these  markets,  to  impose  additional  local  ownership  restrictions  as  part  of  our  CML.” 
1
 Federal  Communications  Commission 
 2 
 4.  This  action  is  taken  pursuant  to  authority  delegated  by  Section  0.291  of  the  Commission’s  Rules,  47  C.  F.  R.  §  0.291. 
 FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 
 W.  Kenneth  Ferree  Chief,  Media  Bureau 
2