*Pages 1--2 from Microsoft Word - 29966* Federal Communications Commission DA 03- 2404 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 In the matter of Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the Commission’s Rules to Permit Operation of NGSO FSS Systems Co- Frequency with GSO and Terrestrial Systems in the Ku- Band Frequency Range; Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to Authorize Subsidiary Terrestrial Use of the 12.2- 12.7 GHz Band by Direct Broadcast Satellite Licensees and Their Affiliates; and Applications of Broadwave USA, PDC Broadband Corporation, and Satellite Receivers, Ltd. to Provide a Fixed Service in the 12.2- 12.7 GHz Band ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 98- 206 RM- 9147 RM- 9245 ERRATUM Released: July 31, 2003 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: 1. On April 29, 2003, the Commission released its Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order (Fourth MO& O), FCC03- 97, in the above proceeding. 1 The Fourth MO& O has a typographical error in the new paragraph (g) that was adopted in Section 25.146 of our rules. Paragraph (g) incorrectly cross references non- existent Section 25.205 (o) instead of Section 25.208 (o). The discussion in the text of the Fourth MO& O at paragraph 108 clearly indicates that Section 25.208 (o) is the correct section that should be cross referenced in Section 25.146. 2. We thus correct Section 25.146 (g) to read as follows: “Operational power flux density, space- to- Earth direction, limits. Ninety days prior to the initiation of service to the public, the NGSO FSS system licensee shall submit a technical showing for the NGSO FSS system in the band 12.2- 12.7 GHz. The technical information shall demonstrate that the NGSO FSS system is capable of meeting the limits as specified in §25. 208 (o). Licensees may not provide service to the public if they fail to demonstrate that they are capable of complying with the PFD limits.” 1 See Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order in ET Docket No. 98- 206, 68 Fed. Reg. 43942, July 25, 2003. 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 03- 2404 2 3. IT IS ORDERED, that this Erratum is issued pursuant to the delegated authority contained in 47 C. F. R. Sections 0.31 and 0.241. Edmond J. Thomas Chief Office of Engineering and Technology 2