*Pages 1--2 from Microsoft Word - 42209* NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S. W. Washington, D. C. 20554 This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D. C. Circ 1974). News Media Information 202 / 418- 0500 Internet: http:// www. fcc. gov TTY: 1- 888- 835- 5322 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: September 10, 2004 Lauren Patrich at (202) 418- 7944 E- mail: lauren. patrich@ fcc. gov FCC ADOPTS NATIONWIDE PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT TO STREAMLINE REVIEW PROCESS FOR COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS Commission Poised To Sign Agreement With Historic Preservation Agencies Washington, D. C – The Federal Communications Commission today announced that it has adopted measures to streamline and tailor the review process for communications towers and other Commission- licensed facilities under the National Historic Preservation Act (“ NHPA”). The Commission’s action adopts the provisions of a Nationwide Programmatic Agreement that, if approved also by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (“ Advisory Council”) and the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers (“ Conference”), would be signed by the three agencies. The Commission’s streamlined process will provide certainty and ease burdens on everyone involved in the review process while continuing to protect historic properties, including those properties to which federally recognized Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian Organizations attach religious or cultural significance. The Commission recognized that, as the number of tower constructions around the country has dramatically increased since the late 1990s, it has a responsibility to manage the expansion of communications infrastructure in a way that best preserves our nation’s historical resources. Increased tower construction has also resulted in an exponential increase in the number of environmental and historic preservation reviews conducted by tower constructors, State Historic Preservation Officers (“ SHPOs”), and FCC staff, creating case backlogs, additional paperwork, and delays in the deployment of necessary wireless, public safety, broadcast and other communications infrastructure. Under Section 106 of the NHPA, federal agencies are required to consider effects of federal undertakings on historic properties. Unless a federal agency has entered into a Programmatic Agreement with specific procedures, it is required to follow the rules of the Advisory Council in performing this review. Because the process in the Advisory Council’s rules for communications towers and antennas is highly complex, a working group of representatives of the Commission, Advisory Council, Conference, American Indian tribes, the communications industry, and historic preservation consultants was formed to consider solutions. 1