*Pages 1--1 from Microsoft Word - 44231.doc* NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S. W. Washington, D. C. 20554 This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D. C. Circ 1974). News Media Information 202 / 418- 0500 Internet: http:// www. fcc. gov TTY: 1- 888- 835- 5322 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACTS November 26, 2004 Richard Diamond: 202- 418- 0513 Mark Wigfield: 202- 418- 0253 CHAIRMAN POWELL ISSUES STATEMENT ON SBC’S TIPToP SERVICE FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell issued the following statement concerning SBC’s new interstate connectivity service, known as TIPToP. “SBC’s interstate tariff for TIPToP service comes at time when VoIP services are continuing to grab consumer attention by offering more choice, lower prices, greater value, and enhanced features. I am committed to ensuring that this Commission avoids any action that might slow the IP- services revolution. “Against this backdrop, the Commission, state utility commissions, and the courts all are considering the question of whether legacy access charges should apply to VoIP services. SBC’s tariff makes clear that TIPToP is not a mandatory offering and VoIP providers may continue to utilize alternatives to exchange their traffic. Should we conclude that this tariff is being used to justify the imposition of traditional tariffed access charges on VoIP providers or to discriminate against SBC’s competitors, the Commission will take appropriate action including, but not limited to, initiating an investigation of SBC’s interstate tariff and any other tariff that proposes similar terms. Nothing in this tariff should be interpreted to force a set of compensation relationships on VoIP providers and their connecting carriers either at this Commission or in other venues. “SBC’s tariff arrives at the Commission while we have before us three proceedings that raise issues related to the charges applicable to VoIP services – a petition filed by Level 3, our larger intercarrier compensation proceeding and a rulemaking on IP- enabled services. I look forward to considering these pending proceedings.” -FCC- 1