*Pages 1--3 from Microsoft Word - 46075.doc* NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S. W. Washington, D. C. 20554 This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D. C. Circ 1974). News Media Information 202 / 418- 0500 Internet: http:// www. fcc. gov TTY: 1- 888- 835- 5322 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: February 10, 2005 Mark Wigfield, 202- 418- 0253 Email: mark. wigfield@ fcc. gov FCC Moves to Replace Outmoded Rules Governing Intercarrier Compensation Seven Comprehensive Reform Proposals To Be Weighed Washington, D. C. – The Federal Communications Commission today took steps toward replacing the outmoded system of intercarrier payments in the telecommunications industry with a uniform regime suited for competitive markets and new technologies. The current system relies on per- minute intercarrier payments that distinguish between different types of carriers and services, such as local and long- distance, or wireless and wireline, even though these distinctions often have no bearing on the cost of providing service. Furthermore, new technologies, such as Internet telephony, and new service offerings, such as bundled flat- rate packages, have eroded these distinctions. Four suggested common themes for reform have emerged from the record developed in the Commission’s 2001 Intercarrier Compensation NPRM. First, any approach should encourage the development of efficient competition and the efficient use of and investment in telecommunications networks. Second, any approach must preserve universal service support, which ensures affordable rates for consumers living in rural and high- cost areas. Any proposal that would result in significant reductions in intercarrier payments should include a proposal to address the universal service implications of such reductions. Third, any approach must be technologically and competitively neutral. Given the rapid changes in telecommunications technology, new rules must accommodate continuing change in the marketplace, provide regulatory certainty and not impede novel technology. Finally, an approach that requires minimal regulatory intervention and enforcement is consistent with the competitive deregulatory environment of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Proposals that rely on negotiated agreements between carriers might be preferable to regimes requiring detailed rules and regulations. The Commission is seeking comment on seven comprehensive reform proposals submitted by the industry and others in the rulemaking. Among the questions the Commission will examine is the effect any change will have on consumers and the universal service fund, which helps provide affordable service for rural and low income Americans. The Commission 1 -3- Wireline Competition Bureau Staff Contact: Victoria Goldberg – (202) 418- 1520; victoria. goldberg@ fcc. gov. -FCC- News about the Federal Communications Commission can also be found on the Commission’s web site www. fcc. gov. 3