*Pages 1--3 from  Microsoft Word - 58217.doc*
 Federal  Communications  Commission 
 Before  the  Federal  Communications  Commission 
 Washington,  D.  C.  20554 
 In  the  Matter  of 
 Universal  Service  Contribution  Methodology 
 Federal-  State  Joint  Board  on  Universal  Service 


 1998  Biennial  Regulatory  Review  –  Streamlined  Contributor  Reporting 
 Requirements  Associated  with  Administration  of  Telecommunications  Relay  Service,  North 
 American  Numbering  Plan,  Local  Number  Portability,  and  Universal  Service  Support 
 Mechanisms 
 Telecommunications  Services  for  Individuals  with  Hearing  and  Speech  Disabilities,  and  the 
 Americans  with  Disabilities  Act  of  1990 
 Administration  of  the  North  American  Numbering  Plan  and  North  American 
 Numbering  Plan  Cost  Recovery  Contribution  Factor  and  Fund  Size 


 Number  Resource  Optimization 
 Telephone  Number  Portability 
 Truth-  in-  Billing  and  Billing  Format 
 IP-  Enabled  Services 


 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 ) 


 WC  Docket  No.  06-  122 
 CC  Docket  No.  96-  45 


 CC  Docket  No.  98-  171 


 CC  Docket  No.  90-  571 
 CC  Docket  No.  92-  237  NSD  File  No.  L-  00-  72 


 CC  Docket  No.  99-  200 
 CC  Docket  No.  95-  116 
 CC  Docket  No.  98-  170 
 WC  Docket  No.  04-  36 
 ERRATUM 
 Released:  July  10,  2006 
 By  the  Acting  Chief,  Telecommunications  Access  Policy  Division: 
 On  June  27,  2006,  the  Commission  released  a  Report  and  Order  and  Notice  of  Proposed  Rulemaking  (FCC  06-  94)  in  the  above-  captioned  proceedings.  This  Erratum  corrects  that  document  as 
 indicated  below: 
 1.  In  paragraph  21,  last  sentence,  we  replace  “of  1996  Act”  with  “of  the  1996  Act”. 
 2.  In  paragraph  26,  sixth  sentence,  we  replace  “Telecoms’”  with  “Telecoms”. 
1
 Federal  Communications  Commission 
 2 
 3.  In  paragraph  53,  eleventh  sentence,  we  replace  “In  fact”  with  “In  fact,”. 
 4.  In  paragraph  55,  last  sentence,  we  replace  “interconnection  VoIP”  with  “interconnected  VoIP”. 


 5.  In  footnote  185,  we  replace  “See  Vonage  June  14,  2006  Ex  Parte  Comments  at  6.”  with  “See  id.  at  6.”. 
 6.  In  footnote  190,  we  replace  “See  supra  n.  116”  with  “See  supra  n.  115”. 
 7.  In  footnote  217,  we  replace  “See  supra  para.  26”  with  “See  supra  paras.  25-  27”. 
 8.  In  Appendix  C  on  page  21  of  the  instructions,  we  replace  “Line  309,  Line  409,  and  Line  410:”  with  “Line  309,  Line  404.3  and  404.4,  Line  409,  and  Line  410:” 


 9.  In  Appendix  C  on  page  24  of  the  instructions,  we  replace  “Interconnected  VoIP  providers  must  make  a  similar  allocation”  with  “Interconnected  VoIP  providers  not  reporting  based  on  the  safe  harbor 
 must  make  a  similar  allocation.” 
 10.  In  Appendix  C  on  page  26  of  the  instructions,  we  replace  “Interconnected  VoIP  long  distance  service  includes:  separately  stated  toll  charges  provided  via  interconnected  VoIP;  an  allocated  share  of  any 


 interconnected  VoIP  service  plan  revenues  where  the  plan  includes  local  and  long  distance  service;  and  any  other  interconnected  VoIP  revenues  for  providing  long  distance  service”  with  “Interconnected  VoIP  long 
 distance  service  includes  separately  stated  toll  charges  provided  via  interconnected  VoIP.” 
 11.  In  Appendix  C  on  page  26  of  the  instructions,  we  replace  “Where  customers  are  charged  a  single  rate  for  a  combined  VoIP  local  and  long  distance  service,  the  portion  of  revenues  corresponding  to 


 local  service  should  be  reported  on  Line  404.2  and  the  portion  of  revenues  corresponding  to  long  distance  service  should  be  reported  on  line  414.2”  with  “Where  customers  are  charged  a  single  rate  for  a  combined 
 VoIP  local  and  long  distance  service,  and  the  reporting  entity  is  not  reporting  based  on  the  safe  harbor,  the  portion  of  revenues  corresponding  to  local  service  should  be  reported  on  Line  404.  3  or  404.4  and  the 
 portion  of  revenues  corresponding  to  long  distance  service  should  be  reported  on  line  414.2.” 
 12.  In  Appendix  D  on  page  16  of  the  instructions,  we  replace  “28.5”  with  “37.1.” 
 13.  In  Appendix  D  on  page  16  of  the  instructions,  we  replace  “Traffic  studies  should  include,  at  a  minimum:  (1)  an  explanation  of  the  sampling  and  estimation  methods  employed;  (2)  an  explanation  as  to 


 why  the  study  results  in  an  unbiased  estimate  with  the  accuracy  specified  above;  (3)  all  of  the  underlying  data  in  machine  readable  form  formatted  for  EXCEL,  ACCESS  or  SAS;  and  (4)  any  documentation 
 necessary  to  facilitate  an  audit  of  the  study  data”  with  “Traffic  studies  should  include,  at  a  minimum:  (1)  an  explanation  of  the  sampling  and  estimation  methods  employed  and  (2)  an  explanation  as  to  why  the 
 study  results  in  an  unbiased  estimate  with  the  accuracy  specified  above.  Mobile  wireless  providers  should  retain  all  data  underlying  their  traffic  studies  as  well  as  all  documentation  necessary  to  facilitate  an  audit 
 of  the  study  data  and  be  prepared  to  make  this  data  and  documentation  available  to  the  Commission  upon  request.” 


 14.  In  Appendix  E,  we  renumber  the  paragraphs  to  begin  with  paragraph  87. 
 15.  In  Appendix  F,  we  renumber  the  paragraphs  to  begin  with  paragraph  150. 
2
 Federal  Communications  Commission 
 3 
 16.  In  Appendix  F,  footnote  409,  we  replace  “See  NPRM,  supra,  para.  69”  with  “See  NPRM,  supra,  paras.  66,  69”. 
 FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 


 Jeremy  D.  Marcus  Acting  Chief 
 Telecommunications  Access  Policy  Division  Wireline  Competition  Bureau 
3