Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1632
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
NECC Telecom, Inc.
Complaint Regarding 
Unauthorized Change of
Subscriber’s Telecommunications Carrier
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
IC No. 06-S0228561
ERRATUM
Released: April 5, 2007
By the Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau:
On November 30, 2006, the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau release an Order, 
DA 06-2434 in the above-captioned proceeding.  This Erratum corrects the Order to include the 
inadvertently omitted footnote 3 to read as follows:
"47 U.S.C. § 258(a); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996); 
Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier Selection Changes Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 
1996; Policies and Rules Concerning Unauthorized Changes of Consumers’ Long Distance Carriers, CC 
Docket No. 94-129, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 14 FCC Rcd 
1508 (1998) (Section 258 Order), stayed in part, MCI WorldCom v. FCC, No. 99-1125 (D.C. Cir. May 18, 
1999); First Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 8158 (2000); stay lifted, MCI WorldCom v. FCC, No. 
99-1125 (D.C. Cir. June 27, 2000); Third Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC 
Rcd 15996 (2000), Errata, DA No. 00-2163 (rel. Sept. 25, 2000), Erratum, DA No. 00-2192 (rel. Oct. 4, 
2000), Order, FCC 01-67 (rel. Feb. 22, 2001); Third Order on Reconsideration and Second Further Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, 18 FCC Rcd 5099 (2003); Order, 18 FCC Rcd 10997 (2003).  Prior to the 
adoption of Section 258, the Commission had taken various steps to address the slamming problem.  See, 
e.g., Policies and Rules Concerning Unauthorized Changes of Consumers' Long Distance Carriers, CC 
Docket No. 94-129, Report and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 9560 (1995), stayed in part, 11 FCC Rcd 856 (1995); 
Policies and Rules Concerning Changing Long Distance Carriers, CC Docket No. 91-64, 7 FCC Rcd 1038 
(1992), reconsideration denied, 8 FCC Rcd 3215 (1993); Investigation of Access and Divestiture Related 
Tariffs, CC Docket No. 83-1145, Phase I, 101 F.C.C.2d 911, 101 F.C.C.2d 935, reconsideration denied, 
102 F.C.C.2d 503 (1985).”
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Nancy A. Stevenson, Deputy Chief
Consumer Policy Division
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau