Federal Communications Commission
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION AND 
CLEARWIRE CORPORATION
Applications For Consent to Transfer Control of 
Licenses, Leases, and Authorizations
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
WT Docket No. 08-94
File Nos. 0003462540 et al.
ERRATUM
Released:  November 10, 2008
By the Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau:
1. On November 7, 2008, the Commission released a Memorandum Opinion and Order, 
FCC 08-259, in the above-captioned proceeding.  This Erratum corrects paragraph 101 to read as follows:
“We decline to impose the conditions requested by Vonage and PISC and 
supported by Bella Mia and PDQLink.  In those cases where compliance with the 
Internet Policy Statement was made a condition for approval of transaction, the 
transactions involved Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers with substantial market power 
who had voluntarily agreed to the condition in question.  In contrast, the Commission has 
declined to impose such a condition when the transaction is not likely to increase the 
incentives to engage in conduct harmful to consumers and there is no history of 
violations.  In this case, Vonage, PISC, Bella Mia and PDQLink have failed to show how 
the transaction could create economic incentives for New Clearwire to harm consumers.  
Furthermore, we believe that PISC’s proposal to require Commission review of all 
contracts regarding financial backing that would potentially affect network openness 
would be burdensome on the parties and on New Clearwire.  PISC also fails to cite any 
precedent for such a potentially sweeping review requirement.  We therefore decline to 
adopt a condition that requires Commission review of all contracts between New 
Clearwire and entities providing financial backing.”
2. This Erratum also corrects the last sentence of paragraph 127 to read as follows:
“Furthermore, we believe the conditions we have imposed pursuant to Sprint Nextel’s 
voluntary commitments will maximize the chances that public interest benefits will flow 
from this transaction.”
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Blaise A. Scinto
Broadband Division
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau