Federal Communications Commission
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Entravision Holdings, L.L.C.
Licensee of Stations 
KFRQ(FM), Harlingen, Texas
KNVO-FM, Port Isabel, Texas
KVLY(FM), Edinburg, Texas 
KKPS(FM), Brownsville, Texas
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NAL/Acct. No. MB-200941410010
FRN: 0001529627 & 0006161525
Facility I.D. No. 56484
Facility I.D. No. 40680
Facility I.D. No. 67188
Facility I.D. No. 56483
ERRATUM
Released:  July 1, 2009
By the Acting Chief, Media Bureau: 
On June 29, 2009, the Media Bureau released a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture 
(NALF), DA 09-1482, in the above-captioned proceeding.  This Erratum amends the NALF as indicated 
below:
1. Paragraph 8 is corrected to read as follows:
 The Commission’s Forfeiture Policy Statement and Section 1.80(b)(4) of the Rules do 
not establish base forfeiture amounts for specific EEO rule violations, such as a failure to recruit 
widely for vacancies or to self-assess EEO performance.  However, they do establish a base 
forfeiture amount of $10,000 for violation of the Commission´s public file rules and of $3,000 for 
failure to file required information.  In determining the appropriate forfeiture amount, we may 
adjust the base amount upward or downward by considering the factors enumerated in Section 
503(b)(2)(D) of the Act, including “the nature, circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation, 
and, with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to 
pay, and such other matters as justice may require.” 
2. Paragraph 9 is corrected to read as follows:
 As discussed supra, the Licensee failed to properly recruit for two of its 12 full-time 
vacancies because it relied solely on an employee referral for one vacancy and a rehire, absent 
sufficient recruitment, of a former employee for another vacancy, in violation of Section 
73.2080(c)(1).  The Licensee also failed to properly recruit widely for two other full-time 
vacancies because it relied solely on two referrals and its website to fill those vacancies, in 
violation of Section 73.2080(c)(1)(i).  Finally, the Licensee failed to place its EEO public file 
report on the Stations’ websites for 2008, as required by Section 73.2080(c)(6).  These failures 
reveal a continuing lack of self-assessment, in violation of Section 73.2080(c)(3).  Accordingly, 
based upon the facts before us, the factors noted above, and pertinent precedent, we find that the 
Licensee is apparently liable for the following forfeiture amounts for its willful and repeated 
violations of these Rules:  $3,000 for its violation of Section 73.2080(c)(1); $5,000 for its 
violation of Section 73.2080(c)(1)(i); $1,000 for its violation of Section 73.2080(c)(3); $3,000 for 
Federal Communications Commission
2
its violation of Section 73.2080(c)(6), for a total proposed forfeiture in the amount of $12,000.  
We will also impose reporting conditions as set forth below, to ensure that the Licensee and any 
successor licensee of any of the Stations maintains an adequate EEO program in compliance with 
the Rules.  The reporting conditions will apply to the Stations, and to all other stations that are 
part of their employment unit.  
3.  Footnote 20 is deleted and the remaining footnotes are renumbered accordingly.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Robert H. Ratcliffe, Acting Chief
Media Bureau