Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau September 2010 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. Copies may be purchased by contacting Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800) 378-3160, or via their website at www.bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 i Contents TEXT Introduction.............................................................................................................................................1 Explanation of terminology used in this report.......................................................................................2 Wireline retail local telephone service....................................................................................................2 Service providers ....................................................................................................................................3 Interconnected VoIP service ...................................................................................................................6 Switched access lines..............................................................................................................................9 Wholesale relationships for switched access lines..................................................................................9 Remainder of the report ........................................................................................................................11 FIGURES 1. Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Technology and Customer Type .................................................................................................................................3 2. Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Customer Type and Regulatory Status .............................................................................................................................4 3. Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Technology, Regulatory Status and Customer Type ..........................................................................................................................5 4. Interconnected VoIP Subscribership by Reported Service Features ................................................7 5. Technology of Internet Access Connections in Interconnected VoIP Broadband Bundles .............8 6. Technology of Retail Switched Access Lines ..................................................................................9 7. Wholesale Relationships as Reported Respectively by CLECs and ILECs ...................................10 TABLES 1. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions............................................................12 2. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Customer Type .............................13 3. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions Reported by Non-ILECs....................14 4. ILEC End-User (Retail) and Wholesale Switched Access Lines, VoIP Subscriptions, and UNEs .......................................................................................................................................15 5. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Type of Technology for Non-ILEC Providers.................................................................................................................16 6. Percentage of Switched Access Lines Presubscribed for Long Distance Service..........................17 7. Residential and Business Presubscribed Switched Access Lines...................................................18 8. Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State ....................................19 9. Residential End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State...........................20 10. Business End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State...............................21 11. Non-ILEC Share of Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State...........................................................................................................................................22 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 ii 12. Non-ILEC Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State ..................23 13. ILEC Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State...........................24 14. Non-ILEC Methods of Providing Wireline Telephone Services by State .....................................25 15. Percentage of End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions Provided to Residential Customers by State .....................................................................................................26 16. Number of Reporting ILECs, Non-ILECs, and VoIP Providers by State ......................................27 17. Mobile Telephone Facilities-based Carriers and Mobile Telephony Subscribers..........................28 18. Percentage of ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers, 2005-2009 .......................29 19. Percentage of Households in ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers, 2005-2009 ......................................................................................................................................29 20. Percentage of ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers by State .............................30 CHARTS 1. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions............................................................12 2. Percent of Lines and VoIP Subscriptions that Serve Residential Customers.................................13 3. Non-ILEC End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions..........................................14 4. ILEC Total Lines and the Percent Provided to CLECs..................................................................15 5. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Type of Technology for Non-ILEC Providers.................................................................................................................16 6. Percent Presubscribed Interstate Long Distance Lines for ILECs..................................................17 MAP Reporting Non-ILEC Interconnected VoIP Providers and CLECs by 5-Digit Geographical ZIP Code .......................................................................................................31 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 1 Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 Introduction. This is the second of our reports about local telephone service in the United States that includes comprehensive information about subscribership to interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (“interconnected VoIP”) service as well as comprehensive information about the more traditional telephone service lines. 1,2 The report summarizes data collected by FCC Form 477 as of June 30, 2009. We include certain ZIP Code-based information in the report. 3 At present, there is no Form 477 requirement to report any telephone service information at the census-tract level of detail. 4 We also update summary statistics for the mobile telephony subscribership information collected by Form 477. 5 1 The first such comprehensive report, which was released in June 2010, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html. It contains more extensive citations for the Commission’s adoption, in 2008, of improvements to the FCC Form 477 data collection program, which made reporting mandatory for providers of retail interconnected VoIP services as well as for local exchange carriers and facilities-based providers of mobile telephony service. Qualifying entities file FCC Form 477 each year on March 1 (reporting data for the preceding December 31) and September 1 (reporting data for June 30 of the same year). The first data collected on Form 477 were for December 31, 1999. Effective with the filing of data as of December 31, 2008, Form 477 is a Web-based electronic filing system. Information about the filing system and the Form 477 program generally is available at http://www.fcc.gov/form477/. 2 The FCC’s rules (at 47 C.F.R. § 9.3) state: An interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service is a service that: (1) Enables real-time, two-way voice communications; (2) Requires a broadband connection from the user’s location; (3) Requires Internet protocol-compatible customer premises equipment (CPE); and (4) Permits users generally to receive calls that originate on the public switched telephone network and to terminate calls to the public switched telephone network. We note that the current interpretation of element (4) of the definition excludes the VoIP services that Skype offers in the United States, and subscribers to those services are not reported on Form 477. Prior to the December 2008 data, companies such as Vonage that solely provide interconnected VoIP service did not file Form 477. Telephone companies and cable companies that provided local exchange telephone service were required to file Form 477 but were not required to report interconnected VoIP subscriptions. However, some of these companies chose to include interconnected VoIP subscriptions in the number of retail (end-user) switched access lines that they reported. 3 Wireline service providers report whether they have at least one residential or business customer in each ZIP Code, using either switched access or interconnected VoIP. Because providers may not offer service across an entire ZIP Code and because different providers may target different customer segments in areas where they provide service, we cannot conclude that the number of providers identified as delivering wireline service within a ZIP Code represents the number of options available to any specific customer within that ZIP Code. We further note that these data on the number of providers in a ZIP Code do not indicate whether a particular provider is offering service solely over its own last-mile facilities or is using the facilities of another carrier or entity. 4 This contrasts with the census tract-based broadband reporting requirements the Commission adopted in 2008, at which time the Commission sought comment about requiring local exchange carriers and interconnected VoIP service providers to report the number of voice telephone service connections, and the percentage of these that are residential, at the 5-digit ZIP Code or census tract level of detail. See Development of Nationwide Broadband Data to Evaluate Reasonable and Timely Deployment of Advanced Services to All Americans, Improvement of Wireless Broadband Subscribership Data, and Development of Data on Interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Subscribership, WC Docket No. 07-38, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 23 FCC Rcd 9691 (2008) at 9708, para. 33. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 2 Explanation of terminology used in this report. • We use “Non-ILEC” to refer to any service provider who does not have incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC) regulatory status, including, for example, competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), including both those who provide service over their own facilities and those who employ ILEC facilities or services, cable companies without CLEC regulatory status who provide interconnected VoIP service, and over-the-top (OTT) interconnected VoIP providers who neither own nor operate telecommunications facilities. • All “VoIP subscriptions” discussed in this report are interconnected VoIP subscriptions. • When referring specifically to ILECs, we use the term “total lines” to mean the sum of ILEC- reported retail (end-user) switched access lines, ILEC interconnected VoIP subscriptions, and ILEC wholesale switched access lines and unbundled network elements (UNEs) provided to CLECs. • We specify “RBOC” and “Other ILEC” when we wish to distinguish between information reported by the Regional Bell Operating Companies (that is, AT&T, Qwest, and Verizon) and information reported by all other ILECs as a group. • We place information into the non-ILEC category if it pertains to the CLEC affiliate of an ILEC who is not one of the RBOCs. • We place information into the ILEC category to the extent the information pertains to the CLEC affiliate of an RBOC who is operating within the RBOC’s ILEC service area. • When counting service providers who have any retail customers in a particular geography (for example, a state or a ZIP Code), we count a holding company or common-control entity no more than once in any specified sub-category of total providers. • Nationwide counts of providers are unique counts for any specified sub-category of total providers (for example, all non-ILECs or all interconnected VoIP providers); an entity operating in multiple states is counted only once. Wireline retail local telephone service. Retail local telephone service customers are served by two wireline technologies – “end-user” switched access lines and interconnected VoIP “subscriptions.” The Form 477 program counts lines and subscriptions as the maximum number of voice calls that can be active at one time from the retail customer’s location (for example, a business customer’s premises) under the service plan that the end user has purchased from a local exchange carrier or interconnected VoIP service retailer. 6 • In June 2009, there were 133 million end-user switched access lines in service and 23 million interconnected VoIP subscriptions in the United States, or about 157 million wireline retail local telephone service connections in total. Of these, 93 million were residential connections and 64 million were business connections. See Figure 1. (Continued from previous page) 5 The presentation of mobile wireless telephone subscriber counts in this report does not constitute, or imply, Commission analysis of the extent to which wireline and mobile wireless telephone services are demand substitutes or complements in general or in any particular situation. In the Form 477 program, commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) carriers who own or operate wireless networks report both their retail telephone service customers and the retail customers of mobile wireless telephone service resellers. 6 Form 477 data may not count all VoIP phone connections to IP PBX equipment that is owned by end users because of the variety of ways the PBX may connect to the public switched telephone network. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 3 • Interconnected VoIP subscriptions increased by 10% during the first six months of 2009 (from 21 million to 23 million subscriptions) and switched access lines decreased by 5% (from 141 million to 133 million lines) for a combined decrease of 3% (from 162 million to about 157 million total wireline retail local telephone service connections). • Cross-classified by technology and customer type, the 157 million wireline retail local telephone service connections in service at mid-year 2009 were: 47% residential switched access lines, 38% business switched access lines, 13% residential interconnected VoIP subscriptions, and 2% business interconnected VoIP subscriptions. See Figure 1. Figure 1 Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Technology and Customer Type as of June 30, 2009 (In Thousands) Switched Access Interconnected Total Lines VoIP Residential 73,090 19,871 92,961 Business 60,154 3,591 63,745 Total 133,244 23,462 156,706 Switched, Residential 47% VoIP, Residential 13% Switched, Business 38% VoIP, Business 2% Service providers. The retailers of wireline local telephone service include a variety of entities that are subject to different federal communications regulation. For example, they include the local telephone companies – both the long-established ILECs and the newer CLECs. They also include cable TV system operators, some of whom acquired CLEC regulatory status to provide switched access lines and others who chose to provide interconnected VoIP service over the communications facilities they own. More recently, they include OTT retailers of interconnected VoIP applications, such as Vonage. The Form 477 program – and this report – distinguishes ILEC operations from all other operations. Generally, ILEC operations are more closely regulated than non-ILEC operations because they operated as local monopolies for many years. After the Telecommunications Act of 1996 became law, some ILECs established CLEC affiliates (usually within a holding company or common-control structure) that compete against other ILECs. Also, some ILECs have acquired CLECs. In particular, RBOCs AT&T U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 4 and Verizon have acquired major CLECs that operated within their ILEC service areas and elsewhere. 7 With this brief overview as background, we report: • Cross-classified by customer type (residential or business) and the service retailer’s regulatory status (ILEC or non-ILEC), the 157 million wireline retail local telephone service connections (including both switched access lines and interconnected VoIP subscriptions) in June 2009 were: 44% ILEC residential service, 28% ILEC business service, 16% non-ILEC residential service, and 12% non-ILEC business service. See Figure 2. Figure 2 Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Customer Type and Regulatory Status as of June 30, 2009 (In Thousands) Residential Business Total ILEC 68,578 44,165 112,743 Non-ILEC 24,383 19,580 43,963 Total 92,961 63,745 156,706 Non-ILEC, Residential 16% ILEC, Business 28% Non-ILEC, Business 12% ILEC, Residential 44% • Additionally cross-classified by technology, the 93 million wireline residential connections in June 2009 were: 73.1% ILEC switched access lines, 20.7% non-ILEC interconnected VoIP subscriptions, 5.5% non-ILEC switched access lines, and 0.6% ILEC interconnected VoIP subscriptions. By contrast, the 64 million wireline business connections were: 68.7% ILEC switched access lines, 25.6% non-ILEC switched access lines, 5.1% non-ILEC interconnected VoIP subscriptions, and 0.6% ILEC interconnected VoIP subscriptions. See Figure 3. 7 Qwest is the third of the three surviving RBOCs. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 5 Figure 3 Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Technology, Regulatory Status, and Customer Type as of June 30, 2009 (In Thousands) Total Switched Access Interconnected Total Lines VoIP ILEC 111,786 958 112,743 Non-ILEC 21,458 22,505 43,963 Total 133,244 23,462 156,706 Residential ILEC 67,981 597 68,578 Non-ILEC 5,109 19,274 24,383 Residential Total 73,090 19,871 92,961 Business ILEC 43,805 361 44,165 Non-ILEC 16,350 3,230 19,580 Business Total 60,154 3,591 63,745 Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. Residential ILEC, Switched 73.1% Non-ILEC, Switched 5.5% Non-ILEC, VoIP 20.7% ILEC, VoIP 0.6% Business ILEC, Switched 68.7% Non-ILEC, Switched 25.6% Non-ILEC, VoIP 5.1% ILEC, VoIP 0.6% U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 6 Interconnected VoIP service. Form 477 identifies three types of information about retail interconnected VoIP service. • First, interconnected VoIP service retailers distinguish the interconnected VoIP subscriptions they sell in a package with broadband Internet access service from all the other interconnected VoIP subscriptions that they sell (“standalone” subscriptions). We note that a retailer might complete the broadband bundle with an Internet access service connection that it owns, with a leased ILEC local loop or service that the retailer has equipped to operate as a broadband Internet access service connection, or with resold Internet access service. We also note that a retailer’s standalone service might be OTT interconnected VoIP but it also might be, for example, a standalone interconnected VoIP subscription sold by a cable system operator or a cable system’s bundle of interconnected VoIP and cable TV service. • Second, filers report whether or not interconnected VoIP subscriptions include, as a service feature, the capability to use the service over any broadband connection to which the customer has access, for example, at a hotel or vacation residence (“nomadic” functionality). • Third, filers identify the different broadband technologies (for example, cable modem Internet access service) in the broadband bundle. The Form 477 data cross-classify the first two of the three new sets of information. See Figure 4. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 7 Figure 4 Interconnected VoIP Subscribership by Reported Service Features as of June 30, 2009 (In Thousands) Total Broadband Standalone Total Bundle VoIP Nomadic 1,583 2,376 3,959 Not nomadic 17,827 1,676 19,503 Total 19,410 4,052 23,462 ILEC Nomadic 16 28 44 Not nomadic 914 # 914 ILEC Total 930 28 958 Non-ILEC Nomadic 1,567 2,349 3,916 Not nomadic 16,913 1,676 18,589 Non-ILEC Total 18,480 4,025 22,504 # = Rounds to zero. ILEC Bundle, Not nomadic 95.4% Bundle, Nomadic 1.7% Standalone, Nomadic 2.9% Standalone, Not nomadic 0.0% Non-ILEC Bundle, Not nomadic 75.2% Standalone, Not nomadic 7.4% Bundle, Nomadic 7.0% S tandalone, Nomadic 10.4% U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 8 Form 477 collects the third type of newly available information – the technology of the Internet access connection – for broadband bundles but not for standalone interconnected VoIP. See Figure 5. 8 Figure 5 Technology of Internet Access Connections in Interconnected VoIP Broadband Bundles as of June 30, 2009 (In Thousands) Technology ILEC Non-ILEC Total DSL or Other Wireline 921 889 1,810 FTTP 8 135 143 Cable Modem 1 17,352 17,353 Terrestrial Fixed Wireless # 19 19 Other 0 85 85 Total 930 18,480 19,410 # = Rounds to zero. ILEC FTTP 0.9% DSL or Other Wireline 99.0% Cable Modem 0.1% Non-ILEC Cable Modem 93.9% Other 0.5% Terrestrial Fixed Wi re l e ss 0.1% DSL or Other Wireline 4.8% FTTP 0.7% 8 Form 477 asks about five technology categories for the bundled Internet access connections, as specified in Figure 5. The “Other Wireline” component of the “DSL or Other Wireline” includes, for example, T-1 circuits and Ethernet over copper. “FTTP” is fiber to the premises. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 9 Switched access lines. ILECs as a group predominantly deliver retail switched access lines over copper local loops. This appears also to be the case for those non-ILECs who report retail switched access lines. 9 See Figure 6. Figure 6 Technology of Retail Switched Access Lines as of June 30, 2009 (In Thousands) Technology ILEC Non-ILEC Total FTTP 3,490 1,848 5,338 Coaxial Cable 189 2,557 2,746 Terrestrial Fixed Wireless 9 15 24 Other 108,097 17,039 125,136 Total 111,786 21,458 133,244 Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. ILEC FTTP 3.1% Coaxial Cable 0.2% Other 96.7% Non-ILEC Coaxial Cable 11.9% FTTP 8.6% Other 79.4% Terrestrial Fixed Wireless 0.1% Wholesale relationships for switched access lines. ILECs typically own the communications facilities over which they provide retail switched access lines to homes and businesses. By contrast, CLECs use a range of methods to provide retail switched access lines: equipping ILEC UNE loops (“UNE-L”) as 9 Form 477 filers have four choices for reporting the technology over which a retail switched access line terminates at the end user’s premises: FTTP, coaxial cable, fixed wireless, and (implicitly) the default category of copper local loop. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 10 CLEC switched access lines, 10 reselling services (for example, reselling ILEC switched access lines obtained at wholesale rates, reselling ILEC lines obtained under commercial agreements that replaced the UNE-Platform (“UNE-P”), or equipping leased ILEC special access circuits as switched access lines), and equipping local loops that the CLEC owns. • At the end of June 2009, CLECs reported using several methods to provide their 21 million retail switched access lines. They reported providing 40% of lines (or about 8.6 million lines) over ILEC facilities leased at regulated, cost-based rates (that is, as UNE-P or UNE-L). They reported providing 32% of lines (or about 6.9 million lines) by reselling ILEC wholesale or retail services. CLEC-owned local loops provided the remaining 28% of lines (or about 6.0 million lines). However, the information about wholesale relationships differs as reported by CLECs and by ILECs. See Figure 7. Figure 7 Wholesale Relationships as Reported Respectively by CLECs and ILECs as of June 30, 2009 (In Thousands) CLEC ILEC Difference Retail Switched Access Lines provisioned over ILEC Services (reported by CLECs) Wholesale Switched Access Lines and UNEs provided to CLECs (reported by ILECs) Resold ILEC services 1 6,851 3,012 3,838 UNE-P 2 1,567 2,543 (976) UNE-L 3 7,061 3,580 3,482 Total ILEC UNEs 8,629 6,123 2,505 Total ILEC services 15,479 9,136 6,344 Revised 11/19/10. Figures may not add to totals due rounding. 1 Resold ILEC services include switched access lines made available to CLECs at wholesale rates, resold Centrex, Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN), or other ILEC services, ILEC special access circuits channelized to provide CLEC retail switched access lines, and ILEC switched access lines provided to CLECs under commercial agreements that replaced UNE-P. (See note 2.) Filers are instructed to count the number of voice-grade channels the retail customer purchased, not the theoretical capacity of the circuit over which the service was delivered. ILECs generally do not know (and do not report) which ILEC leased special access circuits or other high-capacity circuits are being used to provide CLEC retail switched access lines (which the CLECs do report). 2 UNE-P was the combination of ILEC loop UNE, switching UNE, and transport UNE. The Commission directed CLECs to migrate their retail customers served by UNE-P to an alternative arrangement within 12 months of the effective data of the Triennial Review Remand Order, that is, by March 11, 2006. See C.F.R. § 51.319(d)(2)(ii). 3 ILECs report the number of UNE-L they provide to CLECs but do not convert any high-capacity UNE-L, such as DS1 UNE loops, into voice-grade equivalents. By contrast, CLECs report the number of switched access lines their retail customers purchase which the CLEC provisioned over UNE-L obtained from ILECs. Note, however, that a CLEC might use UNE-L only to provide broadband Internet access connections. 10 CLECs (as opposed to non-ILECs more generally) have certain regulatory rights to obtain ILEC local loops at cost-based UNE rates, which the CLEC may use to provide retail switched access lines or retail broadband Internet access connections. See C.F.R. § 51.307. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 11 Possible reasons for the differences summarized in Figure 7 include inconsistent adherence to the Form 477 instructions for reporting UNE-P and for reporting affiliated-ILEC lines or UNEs that CLECs use to provide retail switched access lines. We are working with Form 477 filers to resolve these possibilities. Remainder of the report. The remainder of the report consists of tables and charts that update and expand data presented in earlier reports in this series. We present national data first, followed by state- specific data and, finally, summary statistics of the presence of competitors to the incumbent wireline local telephone service providers in individual ZIP Codes. 11 * * * * We invite users of this information to provide suggestions for improved analysis of data presented in this report by using the attached customer response form or by e-mailing comments to IATDreports@fcc.gov for subject: June 2009 local telephone data. We encourage users of this information to provide suggestions for improved data collection by participating in any formal proceedings undertaken by the Commission to solicit comments for improvement of FCC Form 477. 11 In any individual ZIP Code, the competitors to ILECs may be CLECs or interconnected VoIP providers who are not affiliated with the ILEC, or ILECs, who serve end users in that ZIP Code. Appropriate interpretation of the ZIP Code-based information is discussed in n. 3, above. ILEC Non-ILEC Dec 1999 181,203 8,194 189,397 4.3 % Jun 2000 179,649 11,557 191,206 6.0 Dec 2000 177,561 14,871 192,432 7.7 Jun 2001 174,752 17,275 192,027 9.0 Dec 2001 171,917 19,653 191,571 10.3 Jun 2002 167,330 21,645 188,975 11.5 Dec 2002 164,386 24,864 189,250 13.1 Jun 2003 158,275 26,985 185,260 14.6 Dec 2003 153,158 29,775 182,933 16.3 Jun 2004 147,993 32,034 180,027 17.8 Dec 2004 144,810 32,881 177,691 18.5 Jun 2005 143,758 33,975 177,733 19.1 Dec 2005 143,773 31,388 175,161 17.9 Jun 2006 142,293 29,896 172,189 17.4 Dec 2006 138,834 28,626 167,460 17.1 Jun 2007 134,640 28,729 163,369 17.6 Dec 2007 129,693 28,725 158,418 18.1 Jun 2008 124,606 30,049 154,655 19.4 Dec 2008 118,498 43,753 162,251 27.0 Jun 2009 112,743 43,963 156,706 28.1 Date Total Non-ILEC Share (In Millions) Table 1 End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions 1 End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions Chart 1 (In Thousands) 1 Only incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) and competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) with at least 10,000 retail or wholesale switched access lines in service in a state were required to report through December 2004. All were required to report June 2005 and later data. Providers of interconnected VoIP service were first required to report subscribers as of December 2008, and individual ILECs and CLECs, to a varying and largely unknown degree, included or excluded VoIP subscribers in the earlier data. Interconnected VoIP is distinguished from VoIP service more generally by permitting users to receive calls that originate on the public switched telephone network and to terminate calls to the public switched telephone network. See 47 C.F.R. § 9.3. Form 477 counts both switched access lines and interconnected VoIP subscriptions as the maximum number of calls that may be active, simultaneously, from the end user’s location under the purchased service plan. Provided by Some data for December 2008 have been revised. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 ILEC Non-ILEC Non-ILEC 8.2 11.6 14.9 17.3 19.7 21.6 24.9 27.0 29.8 32.0 32.9 34.0 31.4 29.9 28.6 28.7 28.7 30.0 43.8 44.0 ILEC 181.2 179.6 177.6 174.8 171.9 167.3 164.4 158.3 153.2 148.0 144.8 143.8 143.8 142.3 138.8 134.6 129.7 124.6 118.5 112.7 Dec 1999 Jun 2000 Dec 2000 Jun 2001 Dec 2001 Jun 2002 Dec 2002 Jun 2003 Dec 2003 Jun 2004 Dec 2004 Jun 2005 Dec 2005 Jun 2006 Dec 2006 Jun 2007 Dec 2007 Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 12 Dec 1999 139,694 41,508 77.1 % 3,369 4,826 41.1 % Jun 2000 140,566 39,083 78.2 4,580 6,978 39.6 Dec 2000 138,824 38,737 78.2 6,620 8,251 44.5 Jun 2001 134,531 40,221 77.0 7,793 9,482 45.1 Dec 2001 133,320 38,597 77.5 9,489 10,164 48.3 Jun 2002 130,937 36,393 78.3 11,081 10,564 51.2 Dec 2002 127,495 36,892 77.6 14,608 10,255 58.8 Jun 2003 122,574 35,701 77.4 16,771 10,215 62.1 Dec 2003 118,659 34,499 77.5 18,702 11,073 62.8 Jun 2004 114,533 33,460 77.4 20,872 11,162 65.2 Dec 2004 112,054 32,755 77.4 19,812 13,069 60.3 Jun 2005 95,316 48,442 66.3 16,338 17,637 48.1 Dec 2005 94,393 49,381 65.7 13,873 17,515 44.2 Jun 2006 92,453 49,840 65.0 12,474 17,422 41.7 Dec 2006 89,167 49,667 64.2 12,211 16,415 42.7 Jun 2007 85,633 49,007 63.6 12,117 16,612 42.2 Dec 2007 81,798 47,894 63.1 12,051 16,675 42.0 Jun 2008 77,457 47,149 62.2 12,396 17,654 41.3 Dec 2008 72,787 45,711 61.4 24,653 19,100 56.3 Jun 2009 68,578 44,165 60.8 24,383 19,580 55.5 Percent of Lines and VoIP Subscriptions that Serve Residential Customers 1 Chart 2 % ResidentialBusiness 1 In 2004, the Commission modified instructions for reporting lines serving small businesses. They were counted with residential lines through December 2004 and with business lines thereafter. This change caused a one-time drop in the percentages of ILEC and CLEC lines reported as residential. The December 2008 data are the first for which comprehensive reporting of interconnected VoIP subscribers was required. See footnote 1, Table 1. Some data for December 2008 have been revised. Table 2 End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Customer Type 1 Reporting Non-ILECsReporting ILECs Date (In Thousands) Business Residential % Residential Residential 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% ILECs Non-ILECs ILECs 77.1% 78.2% 78.2% 77.0% 77.5% 78.3% 77.6% 77.4% 77.5% 77.4% 77.4% 66.3% 65.7% 65.0% 64.2% 63.6% 63.1% 62.2% 61.4% 60.8% Non-ILECs 41.1% 39.6% 44.5% 45.1% 48.3% 51.2% 58.8% 62.1% 62.8% 65.2% 60.3% 48.1% 44.2% 41.7% 42.7% 42.2% 42.0% 41.3% 56.3% 55.5% Dec 1999 Jun 2000 Dec 2000 Jun 2001 Dec 2001 Jun 2002 Dec 2002 Jun 2003 Dec 2003 Jun 2004 Dec 2004 Jun 2005 Dec 2005 Jun 2006 Dec 2006 Jun 2007 Dec 2007 Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 13 81 8,194 3,513 1,959 2,723 - 42.9% 23.9% 33.2% - 78 11,557 4,315 3,201 4,042 - 37.3 27.7 35.0 - 89 14,871 4,114 5,540 5,217 - 27.7 37.3 35.1 - 91 17,275 3,919 7,580 5,776 - 22.7 43.9 33.4 - 94 19,653 4,250 9,332 6,072 - 21.6 47.5 30.9 - 96 21,645 4,478 10,930 6,236 - 20.7 50.5 28.8 - 112 24,864 4,677 13,709 6,479 - 18.8 55.1 26.1 - 125 26,985 4,887 15,728 6,370 - 18.1 58.3 23.6 - 136 29,775 4,842 17,888 7,045 - 16.3 60.1 23.7 - 137 32,034 4,927 19,624 7,483 - 15.4 61.3 23.4 - 149 32,881 5,417 18,961 8,503 - 16.5 57.7 25.9 - 326 33,975 5,826 19,025 9,124 - 17.1 56.0 26.9 - 382 31,388 6,704 14,521 10,163 - 21.4 46.3 32.4 - 400 29,896 6,548 12,547 10,802 - 21.9 42.0 36.1 - 397 28,626 5,819 11,663 11,144 - 20.3 40.7 38.9 - 406 28,729 6,193 11,511 11,025 - 21.6 40.1 38.4 - 443 28,725 6,430 10,582 11,713 - 22.4 36.8 40.8 - 469 30,049 6,073 10,884 13,093 - 20.2 36.2 43.6 - 704 43,753 7,066 9,606 6,339 20,743 16.1 22.0 14.5 47.4 715 43,963 6,851 8,629 5,981 22,502 15.6 19.6 13.6 51.2 3 Lines provided over CLEC-owned "last-mile" facilities. Non-ILEC End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions as of June 30, 2009 Jun 2009 Dec 2008 Reporting Non- ILECs End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions Chart 3 Jun 2001 Jun 2008 Table 3 End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions Reported by Non-ILECs 1 (Lines and Subscriptions in Thousands) Acquired from other LECs Percent CLEC- owned local loops 3 End-User Switched Access Lines VoIP Resold LEC service 2 Includes unbundled network element (UNE) loops leased from an unaffiliated ILEC on a stand-alone basis and also UNE loops leased in combination with UNE switching or any other unbundled network element. Dec 2007 Jun 2002 Jun 2003 Jun 2007 Dec 2006 Jun 2005 Dec 2002 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. Dec 2005 Some data for December 2008 have been revised. Jun 2006 CLEC- owned local loops ILEC UNEs Jun 2000 Dec 2000 ILEC UNEs 2 Date Resold LEC service VoIP Dec 1999 Dec 2004 Dec 2003 Jun 2004 Dec 2001 VoIP 51.2% ILEC UNEs 19.6% CLEC-owned local loops 13.6% Resold LEC service 15.6% U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 14 Dec 1999 168 187,190 181,203 - 4,494 1,004 489 1,493 5,987 3.2 % Jun 2000 159 188,058 179,679 - 5,098 1,696 1,616 3,312 8,409 4.5 Dec 2000 166 188,223 177,561 - 5,388 2,436 2,838 5,274 10,662 5.7 Jun 2001 156 187,092 174,752 - 4,417 3,161 4,761 7,922 12,340 6.6 Dec 2001 164 185,391 171,917 - 4,014 3,679 5,781 9,460 13,474 7.3 Jun 2002 166 182,345 167,330 - 3,475 4,061 7,478 11,540 15,015 8.2 Dec 2002 174 181,616 164,386 - 2,743 4,259 10,227 14,487 17,229 9.5 Jun 2003 181 177,770 158,275 - 2,232 4,227 13,036 17,263 19,495 11.0 Dec 2003 185 174,453 153,158 - 1,833 4,287 15,176 19,463 21,296 12.2 Jun 2004 185 171,050 147,993 - 1,600 4,322 17,136 21,458 23,057 13.5 Dec 2004 190 167,063 144,810 - 1,490 4,217 16,546 20,763 22,253 13.3 Jun 2005 757 164,449 143,758 - 1,796 4,300 14,596 18,895 20,691 12.6 Dec 2005 807 160,881 143,773 - 1,793 4,469 10,846 15,315 17,108 10.6 Jun 2006 805 156,872 142,293 - 1,723 4,413 8,443 12,856 14,579 9.3 Dec 2006 814 151,958 138,834 - 1,613 4,408 7,103 11,511 13,124 8.6 Jun 2007 816 146,672 134,640 - 1,517 4,285 6,230 10,515 12,032 8.2 Dec 2007 805 140,808 129,693 - 1,460 4,122 5,534 9,655 11,115 7.9 Jun 2008 800 134,846 124,606 - 1,473 3,827 4,941 8,768 10,241 7.6 Dec 2008 779 128,290 117,969 529 3,209 3,844 2,740 6,583 9,792 7.6 Jun 2009 777 121,879 111,786 958 3,012 3,580 2,543 6,123 9,136 7.5 ILEC Total Lines 3 Without Switching VoIP Total UNEs & Resold Lines Resold Lines With Switching 4 Total UNEs 3 This figure is the sum of ILEC-reported end-user (retail) switched access lines, ILEC interconnected VoIP subscriptions, and ILEC wholesale switched access lines and UNEs provided to CLECs. 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. Some data for December 2008 have been revised. Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. Chart 4 2 Fewer ILECs were counted for mid-year 2009 than mid-year 2007 primarily because FCC staff identified additional common-control relationships among filers. 4 ILEC loops provided with ILEC switching, including the combination of ILEC loop UNE, switching UNE, and transport UNE, collectively referred to as the UNE-Platform ("UNE-P"). The Commission directed CLECs to migrate their retail customers served by these methods to an alternative arrangement by March 11, 2006, i.e., within 12 months of the effective data of the Triennial Review Remand Order. See C.F.R. § 51.319(d)(2)(ii). ILEC Total Lines and the Percent Provided to CLECs Table 4 ILEC End-User (Retail) and Wholesale Switched Access Lines, VoIP Subscriptions, and UNEs 1 (Lines, Subscriptions, and UNEs in Thousands) UNEs Date End-User Switched Access Lines Reporting ILECs 2 % of Total Lines Switched Access Lines and UNEs Provided to CLECs 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 Dec 1999 Jun 2000 Dec 2000 Jun 2001 Dec 2001 Jun 2002 Dec 2002 Jun 2003 Dec 2003 Jun 2004 Dec 2004 Jun 2005 Dec 2005 Jun 2006 Dec 2006 Jun 2007 Dec 2007 Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% ILEC Total Lines Percent Provided to CLECs U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 15 Table 5 End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Type of Technology for Non-ILEC Providers 1 (In Thousands) Date Coaxial Cable 2 Other Technology Total Dec 1999 308 7,886 8,194 3.8 % Jun 2000 614 10,943 11,557 5.3 Dec 2000 1,125 13,746 14,871 7.6 Jun 2001 1,876 15,399 17,275 10.9 Dec 2001 2,246 17,408 19,653 11.4 Jun 2002 2,597 19,048 21,645 12.0 Dec 2002 3,071 21,793 24,864 12.4 Jun 2003 3,123 23,863 26,985 11.6 Dec 2003 3,301 26,474 29,775 11.1 Jun 2004 3,338 28,696 32,034 10.4 Dec 2004 3,706 29,175 32,881 11.3 Jun 2005 4,571 29,404 33,975 13.5 Dec 2005 5,100 26,287 31,388 16.2 Jun 2006 6,070 23,826 29,896 20.3 Dec 2006 6,751 21,875 28,626 23.6 Jun 2007 7,730 21,000 28,729 26.9 Dec 2007 8,385 20,340 28,725 29.2 Jun 2008 9,352 20,697 30,049 31.1 Dec 2008 20,114 23,640 43,753 46.0 Jun 2009 21,547 22,415 43,963 49.0 (In Thousands) 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. 2 This figure includes reported end-user switched access lines and interconnected VoIP connections that terminate on coaxial cable at the end user's premises. Form 477 collects information about the end-user switched access lines that terminate on coaxial cable and (starting, systematically, with the December 2008 data) the interconnected VoIP subscriptions that are sold in a bundle with cable modem Internet access service. FCC staff used other Form 477 data to estimate the number of standalone VoIP subscriptions that terminated on coaxial cable at the end user's premises in December 2008. Percent Coaxial Cable End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Type of Technology for Non-ILEC Providers Chart 5 Some data for December 2008 have been revised. 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Dec 1999 Jun 2000 Dec 2000 Jun 2001 Dec 2001 Jun 2002 Dec 2002 Jun 2003 Dec 2003 Jun 2004 Dec 2004 Jun 2005 Dec 2005 Jun 2006 Dec 2006 Jun 2007 Dec 2007 Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 Coaxial Cable Other Technology U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 16 Table 6 Percentage of Switched Access Lines Presubscribed for Long Distance Service RBOC Other ILEC ILEC Total CLEC Total Residential Jun 2005 52% 49% 51% 80% 56% Dec 2005 56 57 56 88 60 Jun 2006 59 58 59 85 62 Dec 2006 66 60 65 86 68 Jun 2007 66 61 65 86 68 Dec 2007 66 63 65 87 68 Jun 2008 66 64 66 88 69 Dec 2008 69 65 68 80 69 Jun 2009 70 66 69 80 70 Business Jun 2005 45 30 43 69 50 Dec 2005 34 39 34 71 44 Jun 2006 38 37 38 69 46 Dec 2006 47 39 46 68 51 Jun 2007 49 42 48 72 54 Dec 2007 50 43 49 70 54 Jun 2008 49 44 49 72 55 Dec 2008 44 47 44 70 51 Jun 2009 42 49 43 73 51 Total Jun 2005 50 44 49 74 54 Dec 2005 48 52 49 79 54 Jun 2006 51 52 51 76 56 Dec 2006 59 54 58 76 61 Jun 2007 59 56 59 78 62 Dec 2007 60 57 59 77 63 Jun 2008 60 58 59 79 63 Dec 2008 59 60 59 73 61 Jun 2009 58 61 59 74 61 Chart 6 Percent Presubscribed Interstate Long Distance Lines for ILECs Some data for December 2008 have been revised. RBOC is an acronym for Regional Bell Operating Company. They currently are AT&T, Qwest, and Verizon. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Jun 2005 Dec 2005 Jun 2006 Dec 2006 Jun 2007 Dec 2007 Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 Residential Business U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 17 Table 7 Residential and Business Presubscribed Switched Access Lines RBOC Other ILEC ILEC Total CLEC Total Residential Presubscribed 37,634 9,574 47,208 4,082 51,290 Not Presubscribed 15,856 4,917 20,773 1,026 21,799 All Lines 53,490 14,491 67,981 5,109 73,090 Percent Presubscribed 70% 66% 69% 80% 70% Business Presubscribed 15,595 3,049 18,644 11,884 30,528 Not Presubscribed 21,961 3,199 25,160 4,466 29,626 All Lines 37,557 6,248 43,805 16,350 60,154 Percent Presubscribed 42% 49% 43% 73% 51% Total Presubscribed 53,229 12,623 65,852 15,966 81,818 Not Presubscribed 37,818 8,116 45,933 5,492 51,426 All Lines 91,047 20,739 111,786 21,458 133,244 Percent Presubscribed 58% 61% 59% 74% 61% RBOC Other ILEC ILEC Total CLEC Total Residential Presubscribed 39,696 9,865 49,561 4,528 54,089 Not Presubscribed 17,635 5,336 22,972 1,115 24,086 All Lines 57,331 15,201 72,532 5,643 78,175 Percent Presubscribed 69% 65% 68% 80% 69% Business Presubscribed 17,021 3,000 20,021 12,236 32,256 Not Presubscribed 22,041 3,375 25,416 5,129 30,545 All Lines 39,061 6,375 45,437 17,365 62,801 Percent Presubscribed 44% 47% 44% 70% 51% Total Presubscribed 56,717 12,865 69,582 16,764 86,345 Not Presubscribed 39,676 8,712 48,387 6,244 54,631 All Lines 96,392 21,576 117,969 23,008 140,977 Percent Presubscribed 59% 60% 59% 73% 61% Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. Some data for December 2008 have been revised. (In Thousands) June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 RBOC is an acronym for Regional Bell Operating Company. They currently are AT&T, Qwest, and Verizon. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 18 Alabama 1,664 # 1 1,665 263 59 127 449 2,114 21% Alaska 282 0 0 282 * 2 **** American Samoa 10 0 0 10 0000100 Arizona 1,741 # # 1,741 877 73 207 1,156 2,897 40 Arkansas 972 # 10 982 134 20 68 222 1,204 18 California 15,402 5 148 15,555 2,313 394 1,967 4,674 20,230 23 Colorado 1,758 0 0 1,758 395 85 335 815 2,573 32 Connecticut 1,422 # 41 1,463 228 47 364 639 2,103 30 Delaware 362 # 1 363 73 * * 164 527 31 District of Columbia 710 # 4 714 126 12 44 181 895 20 Florida 6,870 3 45 6,918 1,062 400 1,218 2,680 9,598 28 Georgia 3,299 1 4 3,304 540 150 419 1,109 4,413 25 Guam 51 0 0 51 ****** Hawaii 489 # 0 489 39 * * 116 605 19 Idaho 550 # # 550 71 10 34 115 666 17 Illinois 4,975 2 109 5,086 653 238 699 1,590 6,675 24 Indiana 2,381 1 51 2,433 243 74 239 557 2,990 19 Iowa 1,079 # # 1,079 192 102 15 309 1,388 22 Kansas 885 # 13 898 252 26 133 411 1,309 31 Kentucky 1,386 # # 1,387 255 25 226 506 1,892 27 Louisiana 1,561 # # 1,561 276 43 184 503 2,064 24 Maine 519 # 1 519 104 14 110 227 747 30 Maryland 2,499 # 20 2,520 468 97 320 886 3,406 26 Massachusetts 2,353 # 15 2,369 742 138 713 1,593 3,962 40 Michigan 3,210 1 109 3,320 523 197 713 1,433 4,753 30 Minnesota 1,826 0 # 1,826 507 83 268 858 2,685 32 Mississippi 920 # # 920 103 23 57 182 1,102 17 Missouri 2,345 # 22 2,367 240 64 210 514 2,881 18 Montana 371 0 # 371 43 8 51 102 474 22 Nebraska 564 # # 564 242 12 47 301 865 35 Nevada 907 # 3 911 160 57 187 405 1,316 31 New Hampshire 434 # 1 435 151 36 161 347 783 44 New Jersey 3,489 1 30 3,519 783 120 1,082 1,984 5,504 36 New Mexico 713 0 0 713 70 15 41 126 840 15 New York 6,204 1 29 6,234 2,008 186 2,439 4,632 10,867 43 North Carolina 3,326 2 7 3,335 418 108 596 1,122 4,457 25 North Dakota 233 0 0 233 68 * * 104 337 31 Northern Mariana Isl. 17 0 0 17 0000170 Ohio 4,065 2 57 4,124 585 77 775 1,437 5,561 26 Oklahoma 1,158 # 11 1,169 294 40 169 503 1,672 30 Oregon 1,207 # 3 1,210 262 53 243 558 1,768 32 Pennsylvania 5,015 1 13 5,029 1,241 202 729 2,172 7,201 30 Puerto Rico 698 0 0 698 127 18 89 234 933 25 Rhode Island 280 # # 281 247 * * 310 591 52 South Carolina 1,555 # 5 1,561 242 50 199 491 2,051 24 South Dakota 244 0 0 244 94 * * 136 380 36 Tennessee 2,167 1 2 2,170 359 69 292 720 2,890 25 Texas 8,186 3 118 8,307 1,147 201 976 2,324 10,631 22 Utah 725 0 0 725 188 32 116 336 1,061 32 Vermont 299 # # 299 47 * * 90 389 23 Virgin Islands 59 0 0 59 0#0#59# Virginia 3,143 # 17 3,160 1,021 123 318 1,463 4,623 32 Washington 2,207 # 4 2,211 380 107 525 1,013 3,224 31 West Virginia 676 # 1 677 119 17 77 213 889 24 Wisconsin 2,122 # 33 2,156 337 54 359 750 2,905 26 Wyoming 200 0 # 200 13 6 34 53 253 21 Nationwide 111,786 28 930 112,743 21,458 4,025 18,480 43,963 156,706 28 Switched Access Lines # = Rounds to zero. * Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Bundled with Internet VoIP purchased as Total VoIP purchased as ILECs Stand- alone Switched Access Lines Table 8 Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State as of June 30, 2009 (In Thousands) Non-ILEC % of Total State Total Total Bundled with Internet Non-ILECs Stand- alone U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 19 Alabama 1,107 # # 1,108 85 56 115 256 1,363 19% Alaska 140 0 0 140 * 2 **** American Samoa 5005000050 Arizona 1,068 # 0 1,068 503 64 174 740 1,808 41 Arkansas 629 # 10 639 27 17 60 104 743 14 California 8,854 5 95 8,955 727 343 1,528 2,597 11,552 22 Colorado 1,119 0 0 1,119 25 77 296 398 1,517 26 Connecticut 846 # 39 885 60 42 344 446 1,332 34 Delaware 216 # 0 216 10 * * 97 313 31 District of Columbia 155 # 0 155 18 10 26 53 208 25 Florida 4,278 3 4 4,285 91 355 1,114 1,560 5,845 27 Georgia 1,938 1 # 1,940 103 137 380 620 2,559 24 Guam 290029****** Hawaii 277 0 0 277 0 * * 77 354 22 Idaho 356 # # 356 20 9 29 58 414 14 Illinois 2,739 2 70 2,811 98 221 615 934 3,745 25 Indiana 1,511 1 38 1,549 71 69 221 361 1,910 19 Iowa 724 # # 724 90 101 3 194 918 21 Kansas 508 # 12 521 113 22 122 258 779 33 Kentucky 877 # 0 877 143 21 218 382 1,259 30 Louisiana 960 # 0 960 104 41 170 315 1,275 25 Maine 380 # 0 381 11 12 107 131 511 26 Maryland 1,413 # 0 1,413 111 83 300 493 1,906 26 Massachusetts 1,366 # 0 1,367 83 128 671 882 2,249 39 Michigan 1,780 1 96 1,878 189 184 678 1,051 2,929 36 Minnesota 1,263 0 # 1,263 105 79 225 409 1,672 24 Mississippi 578 # 0 578 35 19 52 106 684 16 Missouri 1,511 # 20 1,531 42 60 198 300 1,831 16 Montana 241 0 # 241 15 7 46 69 310 22 Nebraska 320 # # 320 118 11 41 169 490 35 Nevada 528 # 3 531 7 53 172 232 762 30 New Hampshire 302 # 0 302 6 33 153 192 494 39 New Jersey 2,007 1 0 2,008 125 107 1,011 1,244 3,251 38 New Mexico 479 0 0 479 11 14 33 57 536 11 New York 3,619 1 0 3,620 326 159 1,130 1,616 5,236 31 North Carolina 2,119 2 # 2,121 41 98 579 718 2,839 25 North Dakota 157 0 0 157 43 * * 73 230 32 Northern Mariana Isl. 8008000080 Ohio 2,556 2 44 2,602 184 64 741 989 3,591 28 Oklahoma 725 # 11 736 142 37 159 337 1,073 31 Oregon 825 # 0 825 19 48 220 287 1,112 26 Pennsylvania 3,374 1 0 3,374 169 181 665 1,015 4,389 23 Puerto Rico 545 0 0 545 1 17 85 103 648 16 Rhode Island 177 # 0 177 128 * * 183 360 51 South Carolina 1,013 # 0 1,013 55 44 190 290 1,303 22 South Dakota 152 0 0 152 60 * * 100 253 40 Tennessee 1,423 1 0 1,424 61 63 267 392 1,816 22 Texas 4,904 3 97 5,004 176 172 896 1,244 6,249 20 Utah 468 0 0 468 23 29 102 155 623 25 Vermont 214 # 0 214 7 * * 47 261 18 Virgin Islands 39 0 0 39 0#0#39# Virginia 1,820 # 0 1,820 298 111 283 692 2,512 28 Washington 1,448 # 0 1,448 41 100 489 630 2,077 30 West Virginia 514 # 0 514 14 15 74 103 617 17 Wisconsin 1,271 # 29 1,301 86 50 352 487 1,788 27 Wyoming 107 0 # 107 5 6 32 43 150 29 Nationwide 67,981 27 570 68,578 5,109 3,626 15,648 24,383 92,961 26 Non-ILECs Stand- alone Bundled with Internet Stand- alone Bundled with Internet Total Switched Access Lines VoIP purchased as Total # = Rounds to zero. * Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Table 9 Residential End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State as of June 30, 2009 (In Thousands) State ILECs Total Non-ILEC % of Total Switched Access Lines VoIP purchased as U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 20 Alabama 557 # # 557 178 3 12 193 751 26% Alaska 142 0 0 142 * # **** American Samoa 5005000050 Arizona 672 0 # 673 373 9 34 416 1,089 38 Arkansas 343 0 # 343 107 2 9 118 461 26 California 6,548 # 52 6,601 1,586 51 440 2,077 8,677 24 Colorado 640 0 0 640 370 7 39 417 1,057 39 Connecticut 576 # 2 578 168 5 20 193 771 25 Delaware 146 0 1 147 63 * * 67 214 31 District of Columbia 555 0 4 559 109 2 18 129 687 19 Florida 2,592 # 41 2,633 971 46 104 1,120 3,753 30 Georgia 1,360 # 4 1,365 437 12 40 489 1,854 26 Guam 230023*0**** Hawaii 212 # 0 212 39 * * 39 251 16 Idaho 194 # # 195 51 1 5 57 252 23 Illinois 2,236 # 38 2,275 554 17 84 656 2,930 22 Indiana 870 # 13 884 172 5 19 196 1,080 18 Iowa 354 # # 354 102 1 12 115 470 25 Kansas 376 # 1 377 139 4 11 154 531 29 Kentucky 510 # # 510 112 4 8 124 634 20 Louisiana 601 # # 601 172 2 14 188 789 24 Maine 138 0 1 139 92 1 3 96 235 41 Maryland 1,087 0 20 1,107 357 15 21 392 1,500 26 Massachusetts 987 0 15 1,002 658 10 42 711 1,713 42 Michigan 1,429 # 12 1,442 334 13 34 382 1,823 21 Minnesota 563 0 # 563 402 4 43 449 1,012 44 Mississippi 342 0 # 342 68 3 5 76 418 18 Missouri 834 # 3 837 197 4 12 213 1,050 20 Montana 131 0 0 131 28 1 5 33 164 20 Nebraska 243 0 # 243 125 1 6 132 375 35 Nevada 379 0 # 380 154 4 15 173 553 31 New Hampshire 132 0 1 133 145 3 8 156 289 54 New Jersey 1,482 0 30 1,512 658 12 71 741 2,253 33 New Mexico 234 0 0 234 59 1 8 69 303 23 New York 2,585 0 29 2,615 1,682 26 1,309 3,017 5,631 54 North Carolina 1,207 0 7 1,214 377 11 16 404 1,618 25 North Dakota 76 0 0 76 25 * * 30 107 28 Northern Mariana Isl. 9009000090 Ohio 1,508 # 13 1,521 401 13 34 448 1,970 23 Oklahoma 433 0 # 434 152 3 11 166 600 28 Oregon 382 0 3 385 243 5 24 271 656 41 Pennsylvania 1,641 0 13 1,655 1,071 22 64 1,157 2,812 41 Puerto Rico 154 0 0 154 125 1 4 131 285 46 Rhode Island 104 0 # 104 119 * * 127 231 55 South Carolina 542 # 5 548 187 5 9 201 748 27 South Dakota 92 0 0 92 34 * * 36 127 28 Tennessee 744 # 2 746 298 6 25 328 1,074 31 Texas 3,281 # 21 3,303 971 28 80 1,080 4,382 25 Utah 257 0 0 257 164 3 14 181 438 41 Vermont 85 0 # 86 40 * * 43 128 33 Virgin Islands 19 0 0 19 0#0#19# Virginia 1,324 0 17 1,340 723 12 35 770 2,111 36 Washington 760 0 4 763 339 7 36 383 1,146 33 West Virginia 162 0 1 162 105 2 2 110 272 40 Wisconsin 851 # 4 855 251 5 7 263 1,117 24 Wyoming 93 0 0 93 8 # 2 10 103 10 Nationwide 43,805 1 360 44,165 16,350 399 2,831 19,580 63,745 31 Non-ILECs Stand- alone Bundled with Internet Stand- alone Bundled with Internet Total Switched Access Lines VoIP purchased as Total # = Rounds to zero. * Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Table 10 Business End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State as of June 30, 2009 (In Thousands) State ILECs Total Non-ILEC % of Total Switched Access Lines VoIP purchased as U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 21 Alabama 16 % 15 % 16 % 13 % 13 % 14 % 16 % 21 % 21 % Alaska * * 26 **** ** American Samoa 0000000 00 Arizona 27 30 30 32 33 34 37 40 40 Arkansas 13 11 12 13 14 14 14 18 18 California 18 13 13 14 14 14 15 22 23 Colorado 17 20 19 17 17 16 19 31 32 Connecticut 14 11 12 12 13 14 15 29 30 Delaware 20 20 18 18 19 17 18 30 31 District of Columbia 20 17 14 14 14 14 15 20 20 Florida 16 17 15 13 13 13 14 27 28 Georgia 21 18 19 14 16 16 17 25 25 Guam NA 0000** ** Hawaii 6 7 9 11 13 16 18 18 19 Idaho 10 10 11 10 11 11 11 17 17 Illinois 20 15 15 15 14 14 14 24 24 Indiana 14 10 10 10 9 9 11 18 19 Iowa 14 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 22 Kansas 25 21 24 23 25 26 28 31 31 Kentucky 14 15 16 15 16 19 18 25 27 Louisiana 19 17 18 16 17 18 21 23 24 Maine 20 20 16 16 17 20 24 28 30 Maryland 18 18 16 15 15 14 15 25 26 Massachusetts 25 25 24 24 23 24 25 39 40 Michigan 25 19 18 17 18 19 20 29 30 Minnesota 21 24 23 22 24 23 22 31 32 Mississippi 14 12 13 10 10 10 11 16 17 Missouri 14 11 13 13 14 14 15 17 18 Montana 8 10 12 14 16 18 19 21 22 Nebraska 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 34 35 Nevada 13 13 17 15 24 22 26 30 31 New Hampshire 25 25 24 23 23 23 25 42 44 New Jersey 22 21 17 18 17 17 18 34 36 New Mexico 87888891415 New York 30 31 27 27 28 29 31 41 43 North Carolina 13 15 16 16 18 19 20 24 25 North Dakota 20 19 20 21 21 22 24 32 31 Northern Mariana Isl. NA 000000 00 Ohio 15 15 15 16 18 20 23 25 26 Oklahoma 18 18 20 21 23 25 27 30 30 Oregon 13 19 16 17 18 18 18 31 32 Pennsylvania 23 23 20 19 20 20 21 29 30 Puerto Rico ******19225 Rhode Island 40 42 43 46 47 48 50 52 52 South Carolina 13 13 15 14 16 17 19 22 24 South Dakota 30 33 33 30 30 31 32 36 36 Tennessee 16 17 18 15 16 17 18 25 25 Texas 19 16 16 17 16 17 18 21 22 Utah 23 22 24 21 22 20 21 26 32 Vermont 14 12 12 12 12 12 13 23 23 Virgin Islands * * * 0000 *# Virginia 21 22 21 22 22 23 23 30 32 Washington 14 14 14 14 15 14 16 30 31 West Virginia 12 12 12 13 13 14 16 21 24 Wisconsin 19 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 Wyoming 11 12 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 Nationwide 19 % 18 % 17 % 17 % 18 % 18 % 19 % 27 % 28 % * Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. NA is an abbreviation for not available. Some data for December 2008 have been revised. 2009 Table 11 Non-ILEC Share of Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State 1 Jun State 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. 2008 Jun JunJunDec Jun Dec 2007 DecDec 20062005 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 2009 Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Alabama 394 359 366 301 298 315 352 460 449 Alaska * * 116 * * * * * * American Samoa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arizona 865 979 970 1,018 1,043 1,071 1,129 1,218 1,156 Arkansas 182 152 163 166 178 173 175 223 222 California 4,030 3,023 2,900 3,046 2,898 2,984 3,101 4,536 4,674 Colorado 497 591 529 452 425 395 449 838 815 Connecticut 316 251 262 261 261 265 291 625 639 Delaware 122 118 102 100 99 85 85 164 164 District of Columbia 223 173 145 144 137 131 136 182 181 Florida 1,745 1,869 1,618 1,340 1,298 1,265 1,276 2,690 2,680 Georgia 1,032 886 909 655 730 725 764 1,157 1,109 Guam 0 0 0 0 0 * * * * Hawaii 38 49 61 74 88 103 115 114 116 Idaho 77 76 81 76 78 75 79 122 115 Illinois 1,602 1,136 1,139 1,075 950 909 875 1,646 1,590 Indiana 493 360 338 335 293 284 313 559 557 Iowa 216 222 230 238 251 269 273 307 309 Kansas 362 301 347 327 349 358 375 417 411 Kentucky 302 306 337 313 328 371 331 493 506 Louisiana 460 365 394 358 363 383 449 488 503 Maine 169 164 135 123 135 150 181 211 227 Maryland 717 691 591 552 527 475 479 854 886 Massachusetts 1,089 1,037 979 928 865 844 871 1,590 1,593 Michigan 1,483 1,049 993 883 923 893 927 1,442 1,433 Minnesota 643 724 676 641 659 613 572 873 858 Mississippi 175 156 161 125 125 112 122 182 182 Missouri 452 369 426 403 436 448 471 519 514 Montana 43 52 62 72 82 93 96 101 102 Nebraska 228 237 244 249 258 265 274 298 301 Nevada 185 182 246 219 356 307 372 414 405 New Hampshire 218 209 196 182 171 165 167 343 347 New Jersey 1,389 1,283 994 977 897 859 866 1,925 1,984 New Mexico 76 65 77 75 77 73 75 121 126 New York 3,575 3,553 3,043 2,942 2,868 2,941 3,125 4,511 4,632 North Carolina 627 749 798 768 846 888 953 1,084 1,122 North Dakota 69 67 68 70 71 71 76 113 104 Northern Mariana Isl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ohio 981 953 963 962 1,069 1,171 1,365 1,463 1,437 Oklahoma 329 329 362 387 420 445 474 519 503 Oregon 260 375 306 318 325 308 300 571 558 Pennsylvania 1,878 1,892 1,572 1,437 1,521 1,407 1,423 2,186 2,172 Puerto Rico * * * * * * 186 210 234 Rhode Island 267 265 276 287 291 290 301 316 310 South Carolina 290 292 330 321 349 369 399 472 491 South Dakota 128 136 135 119 117 119 124 140 136 Tennessee 538 543 576 465 483 510 523 751 720 Texas 2,332 1,884 1,906 1,969 1,859 1,944 1,919 2,349 2,324 Utah 281 260 282 245 242 212 211 269 336 Vermont 61 51 49 48 47 47 47 88 90 Virgin Islands * * * 0 0 0 0 * # Virginia 1,058 1,110 1,047 1,032 1,048 1,034 1,043 1,427 1,463 Washington 505 514 506 479 480 428 471 1,020 1,013 West Virginia 118 118 117 119 121 132 141 195 213 Wisconsin 645 588 612 653 684 709 744 765 750 Wyoming 30 34 39 44 46 48 51 54 53 Total 33,975 31,388 29,896 28,626 28,729 28,725 30,049 43,753 43,963 # = Rounds to zero; * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Some data for December 2008 have been revised. 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. 2006 2008 State 20072005 Table 12 Non-ILEC Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State 1 (In Thousands) U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 23 2005 2009 Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Alabama 2,024 2,024 1,979 2,016 1,982 1,991 1,861 1,746 1,665 Alaska 328 326 325 321 318 301 294 289 282 American Samoa 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 10 10 Arizona 2,326 2,295 2,227 2,175 2,109 2,035 1,943 1,847 1,741 Arkansas 1,216 1,215 1,193 1,164 1,132 1,105 1,069 1,021 982 California 18,945 19,631 19,479 18,926 18,485 17,864 17,149 16,345 15,555 Colorado 2,371 2,338 2,276 2,207 2,133 2,057 1,973 1,873 1,758 Connecticut 1,985 1,962 1,928 1,849 1,785 1,681 1,632 1,540 1,463 Delaware 479 467 468 450 432 414 396 380 363 District of Columbia 894 872 892 855 832 797 788 737 714 Florida 9,345 9,210 9,013 8,975 8,708 8,356 7,932 7,440 6,918 Georgia 3,972 3,970 3,844 4,045 3,957 3,824 3,675 3,468 3,304 Guam 0 67 68 68 67 66 62 54 51 Hawaii 644 627 608 584 562 541 516 512 489 Idaho 682 672 666 664 651 628 609 582 550 Illinois 6,214 6,497 6,354 6,154 5,976 5,773 5,562 5,342 5,086 Indiana 3,070 3,112 3,080 2,971 2,875 2,766 2,665 2,547 2,433 Iowa 1,356 1,325 1,302 1,273 1,245 1,200 1,162 1,113 1,079 Kansas 1,110 1,123 1,100 1,074 1,046 1,012 977 939 898 Kentucky 1,792 1,768 1,732 1,725 1,684 1,616 1,542 1,458 1,387 Louisiana 1,954 1,832 1,800 1,825 1,801 1,759 1,710 1,634 1,561 Maine 688 664 692 669 649 611 579 542 519 Maryland 3,173 3,097 3,166 3,079 2,984 2,886 2,792 2,588 2,520 Massachusetts 3,246 3,102 3,076 2,927 2,830 2,712 2,609 2,493 2,369 Michigan 4,411 4,609 4,491 4,303 4,118 3,895 3,719 3,514 3,320 Minnesota 2,385 2,319 2,273 2,210 2,137 2,078 2,006 1,922 1,826 Mississippi 1,117 1,114 1,089 1,108 1,091 1,035 1,018 963 920 Missouri 2,892 2,907 2,842 2,778 2,722 2,650 2,568 2,465 2,367 Montana 487 473 460 445 435 416 406 387 371 Nebraska 692 681 661 644 628 624 606 584 564 Nevada 1,252 1,246 1,233 1,200 1,158 1,106 1,042 972 911 New Hampshire 646 624 624 598 575 546 507 470 435 New Jersey 4,847 4,715 4,784 4,543 4,354 4,137 3,936 3,734 3,519 New Mexico 902 893 877 860 834 816 783 754 713 New York 8,292 8,020 8,297 7,900 7,417 7,068 6,902 6,557 6,234 North Carolina 4,239 4,142 4,060 4,067 3,973 3,847 3,715 3,519 3,335 North Dakota 280 279 272 267 261 253 248 241 233 Northern Mariana Isl. 0 23 21 21 19 18 18 17 17 Ohio 5,505 5,575 5,368 5,168 4,973 4,763 4,537 4,326 4,124 Oklahoma 1,535 1,521 1,470 1,425 1,375 1,321 1,267 1,216 1,169 Oregon 1,673 1,643 1,627 1,562 1,502 1,429 1,359 1,286 1,210 Pennsylvania 6,400 6,300 6,385 6,175 5,953 5,775 5,494 5,243 5,029 Puerto Rico 1,048 1,021 1,035 994 916 809 786 755 698 Rhode Island 394 369 363 340 327 312 302 292 281 South Carolina 1,895 1,939 1,908 1,909 1,866 1,798 1,728 1,629 1,561 South Dakota 297 279 280 278 276 268 261 251 244 Tennessee 2,727 2,718 2,676 2,695 2,618 2,537 2,436 2,297 2,170 Texas 9,730 10,036 9,958 9,738 9,608 9,329 9,020 8,673 8,307 Utah 917 924 915 894 864 844 811 776 725 Vermont 370 364 370 362 355 340 323 289 299 Virgin Islands 70 70 69 68 67 64 62 61 59 Virginia 3,925 3,834 3,844 3,734 3,642 3,540 3,422 3,265 3,160 Washington 3,137 3,063 2,994 2,868 2,762 2,643 2,509 2,367 2,211 West Virginia 891 876 852 828 806 780 752 714 677 Wisconsin 2,725 2,739 2,670 2,605 2,516 2,422 2,336 2,246 2,156 Wyoming 249 252 245 238 233 225 218 209 200 Total 143,758 143,773 142,293 138,834 134,640 129,693 124,606 118,498 112,743 Some data for December 2008 have been revised. Table 13 ILEC Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State 1 (In Thousands) 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. State 2006 2007 2008 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 24 Table 14 Non-ILEC Methods of Providing Wireline Telephone Services by State as of June 30, 2009 State Resold LEC service ILEC UNEs CLEC-owned local loops VoIP Subscriptions 1 Total Alabama 61 133 70 186 449 Alaska * * * * * American Samoa 0 0 0 0 0 Arizona 159 125 592 280 1,156 Arkansas 14 46 74 88 222 California 822 747 750 2,361 4,674 Colorado 156 167 72 420 815 Connecticut 39 83 106 412 639 Delaware * 35 * 91 164 District of Columbia 54 29 43 55 181 Florida 374 536 151 1,618 2,680 Georgia 121 300 119 569 1,109 Guam 0 0 * * * Hawaii 21 2 15 78 116 Idaho 21 30 20 44 115 Illinois 187 366 100 937 1,590 Indiana 56 112 75 314 557 Iowa 54 53 86 117 309 Kansas 49 69 135 159 411 Kentucky 62 84 108 251 506 Louisiana 52 105 119 228 503 Maine 25 63 15 124 227 Maryland 261 173 34 418 886 Massachusetts 303 294 145 851 1,593 Michigan 64 418 42 910 1,433 Minnesota 131 257 118 351 858 Mississippi 43 51 9 80 182 Missouri 61 128 51 274 514 Montana 9 10 23 59 102 Nebraska 52 8 183 59 301 Nevada 74 64 23 245 405 New Hampshire 44 84 23 196 347 New Jersey 428 232 123 1,202 1,984 New Mexico 33 19 18 56 126 New York 823 747 437 2,625 4,632 North Carolina 119 193 106 704 1,122 North Dakota 6 13 50 35 104 Northern Mariana Isl. 0 0 0 0 0 Ohio 127 272 185 852 1,437 Oklahoma 65 59 170 209 503 Oregon 79 155 28 296 558 Pennsylvania 465 475 301 932 2,172 Puerto Rico 42 * * 107 234 Rhode Island 32 32 183 63 310 South Carolina 57 127 58 249 491 South Dakota 4 2 88 42 136 Tennessee 113 164 83 361 720 Texas 352 594 202 1,177 2,324 Utah 65 95 28 148 336 Vermont 13 25 9 43 90 Virgin Islands 0 0 0 # # Virginia 427 244 351 441 1,463 Washington 118 199 63 633 1,013 West Virginia 27 85 7 94 213 Wisconsin 41 262 33 413 750 Wyoming 4 6 3 40 53 Total 6,851 8,629 5,981 22,502 43,963 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. (In Thousands) # = Rounds to zero. * Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 25 State Alabama 67% 57% 64% Alaska 50 * * American Samoa 50 NA 50 Arizona 61 64 62 Arkansas 65 47 62 California 58 56 57 Colorado 64 49 59 Connecticut 60 70 63 Delaware 60 59 59 District of Columbia 22 29 23 Florida 62 58 61 Georgia 59 56 58 Guam 57 * * Hawaii 57 66 59 Idaho 65 50 62 Illinois 55 59 56 Indiana 64 65 64 Iowa 67 63 66 Kansas 58 63 60 Kentucky 63 75 67 Louisiana 61 63 62 Maine 73 58 68 Maryland 56 56 56 Massachusetts 58 55 57 Michigan 57 73 62 Minnesota 69 48 62 Mississippi 63 58 62 Missouri 65 58 64 Montana 65 68 65 Nebraska 57 56 57 Nevada 58 57 58 New Hampshire 69 55 63 New Jersey 57 63 59 New Mexico 67 45 64 New York 58 35 48 North Carolina 64 64 64 North Dakota 67 70 68 Northern Mariana Isl. 47 NA 47 Ohio 63 69 65 Oklahoma 63 67 64 Oregon 68 51 63 Pennsylvania 67 47 61 Puerto Rico 78 44 69 Rhode Island 63 59 61 South Carolina 65 59 64 South Dakota 62 74 67 Tennessee 66 54 63 Texas 60 54 59 Utah 65 46 59 Vermont 72 52 67 Virgin Islands 66 * 66 Virginia 58 47 54 Washington 65 62 64 West Virginia 76 48 69 Wisconsin 60 65 62 Wyoming 54 81 59 Nationwide 61 55 59 * Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. NA is an abbreviation for not applicable. Table 15 Percentage of End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions ILECs Non-ILECs Total Provided to Residential Customers by State as of June 30, 2009 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 26 State ILECs Non-ILECs Total 1 VoIP Providers 2 Alabama 21 97 118 64 Alaska 17 18 35 15 American Samoa 1 0 1 0 Arizona 17 84 101 66 Arkansas 20 67 87 46 California 15 127 142 92 Colorado 26 85 111 63 Connecticut 2 70 72 57 Delaware 1 54 55 37 District of Columbia 1 69 70 49 Florida 10 165 175 100 Georgia 27 133 160 90 Guam 1 5 6 4 Hawaii 2 28 30 25 Idaho 20 60 80 46 Illinois 44 135 179 86 Indiana 29 109 138 67 Iowa 137 88 225 37 Kansas 37 87 124 54 Kentucky 16 104 120 61 Louisiana 11 78 89 46 Maine 8 52 60 35 Maryland 2 97 99 67 Massachusetts 5 87 92 62 Michigan 27 104 131 66 Minnesota 55 102 157 63 Mississippi 13 82 95 51 Missouri 32 87 119 58 Montana 18 52 70 37 Nebraska 33 62 95 43 Nevada 13 72 85 55 New Hampshire 8 64 72 47 New Jersey 3 106 109 70 New Mexico 17 64 81 43 New York 25 131 156 87 North Carolina 19 109 128 71 North Dakota 22 45 67 26 Northern Mariana Isl 1 0 1 0 Ohio 34 120 154 82 Oklahoma 38 77 115 47 Oregon 26 89 115 61 Pennsylvania 23 114 137 76 Puerto Rico 1 14 15 12 Rhode Island 1 48 49 36 South Carolina 17 103 120 62 South Dakota 28 45 73 31 Tennessee 18 107 125 71 Texas 49 155 204 94 Utah 11 59 70 46 Vermont 8 44 52 33 Virgin Islands 1 4 5 4 Virginia 16 107 123 79 Washington 18 91 109 65 West Virginia 7 54 61 39 Wisconsin 42 99 141 55 Wyoming 10 48 58 34 Nationwide 777 715 1,492 382 2 The providers reporting interconnected VoIP subscribers in a state are a subset of the ILECs and non-ILECs in that state. Table 16 Number of Reporting ILECs, Non-ILECs, and VoIP Providers by State as of June 30, 2009 1 Holding companies or common-control entities that report both ILEC and non-ILEC operations in a state are counted once in the ILECs column and once in the Non-ILECs column for that state. Either type of operations might report interconnected VoIP subscribers. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 27 2009 Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Alabama 14 7 % 2,874 3,105 3,276 3,375 3,605 3,765 3,887 3,960 4,003 Alaska 12 5 341 377 397 412 432 460 480 383 544 American Samoa * * * * * * * * * * * Arizona 12 7 3,543 3,844 4,153 4,405 4,637 4,800 4,936 4,983 5,005 Arkansas 8 11 1,681 1,781 1,924 2,044 2,149 2,288 2,446 2,530 2,576 California 16 7 24,572 25,537 27,497 29,717 30,204 32,247 31,946 32,177 32,215 Colorado 12 10 3,041 3,247 3,428 3,608 3,756 3,968 4,066 4,311 4,348 Connecticut 9 7 2,329 2,463 2,582 2,705 2,787 2,884 2,959 3,030 3,047 Delaware 8 8 585 618 650 683 724 751 775 778 779 District of Columbia 8 9 753 825 879 880 966 936 1,047 1,096 1,116 Florida 13 10 12,620 12,568 14,177 14,762 15,255 15,605 15,809 16,158 16,425 Georgia 15 7 6,001 6,079 6,865 7,282 7,598 7,941 8,142 8,322 8,562 Guam * * * * * * * * * * * Hawaii 7 4 934 983 1,010 1,035 1,067 1,096 1,115 1,184 1,196 Idaho 17 6 774 834 901 973 1,019 1,086 1,125 1,167 1,180 Illinois 15 7 8,227 8,655 9,148 9,589 9,949 10,330 10,634 10,919 11,070 Indiana 13 10 3,443 3,716 3,973 4,271 4,448 4,675 4,824 4,956 4,983 Iowa 67 9 1,634 1,811 1,867 2,010 2,058 2,166 2,245 2,319 2,340 Kansas 15 13 1,660 1,794 1,905 2,047 2,133 2,261 2,326 2,421 2,430 Kentucky 12 10 2,508 2,662 2,821 2,966 3,101 3,291 3,343 3,445 3,439 Louisiana 10 7 2,942 3,192 3,356 3,492 3,612 3,765 3,896 4,012 4,053 Maine 8 18 711 746 787 845 882 941 972 1,012 1,006 Maryland 11 7 3,968 4,239 4,471 4,691 4,818 5,024 5,124 5,234 5,260 Massachusetts 9 45 4,488 4,728 4,917 5,129 5,289 5,470 5,624 5,749 6,027 Michigan 14 12 6,230 6,604 6,863 7,094 7,333 7,608 7,821 8,027 8,171 Minnesota 9 9 3,132 3,380 3,543 3,702 3,834 4,048 4,164 4,345 4,254 Mississippi 11 8 1,631 1,821 1,923 2,030 2,070 2,196 2,252 2,312 2,361 Missouri 14 9 3,595 3,853 4,068 4,322 4,480 4,674 4,835 4,940 4,985 Montana 8 8 466 525 575 620 650 694 723 748 707 Nebraska 11 8 1,071 1,160 1,199 1,272 1,325 1,387 1,451 1,496 1,508 Nevada 13 9 1,605 1,777 1,883 1,990 2,093 2,167 2,249 2,268 2,325 New Hampshire 8 11 791 849 897 943 973 1,022 1,045 1,080 1,075 New Jersey 9 6 6,234 6,617 6,954 7,207 7,419 7,654 7,834 8,008 8,036 New Mexico 10 8 1,025 1,170 1,253 1,333 1,416 1,489 1,555 1,536 1,550 New York 13 11 12,996 13,805 14,574 15,262 15,901 16,395 17,260 16,702 18,194 North Carolina 13 9 5,503 5,792 6,209 6,627 6,962 7,306 7,428 8,024 8,193 North Dakota 8 6 368 432 457 473 492 513 541 581 562 Northern Mariana Isl. * * * * * * * * * * * Ohio 13 10 6,994 7,504 7,939 8,380 8,723 9,099 9,357 9,565 9,456 Oklahoma 17 8 2,002 2,189 2,317 2,480 2,572 2,723 2,808 2,889 2,931 Oregon 11 8 2,056 2,339 2,484 2,656 2,781 2,923 3,007 3,084 3,112 Pennsylvania 15 11 7,397 7,942 8,349 8,831 9,201 9,615 9,895 10,214 10,455 Puerto Rico 7 1 2,003 2,111 2,171 2,301 2,323 2,411 2,502 2,624 2,706 Rhode Island 7 9 689 749 765 798 829 848 874 888 880 South Carolina 14 9 2,607 2,784 3,001 3,209 3,340 3,500 3,573 3,323 3,374 South Dakota 9 6 434 481 514 548 570 596 611 631 613 Tennessee 13 10 4,066 4,417 4,731 5,127 4,971 5,246 5,791 5,518 5,676 Texas 27 7 14,424 15,644 16,928 17,822 18,792 19,677 20,390 21,008 21,460 Utah 15 6 1,414 1,530 1,649 1,775 1,874 1,971 2,046 2,095 2,109 Vermont 7 18 295 314 334 358 375 402 421 435 398 Virgin Islands * * * * * * * * * * * Virginia 12 11 4,851 5,073 5,325 5,607 6,148 6,416 6,242 6,856 6,596 Washington 11 8 4,062 4,249 4,495 4,799 5,035 5,292 5,461 5,624 5,671 West Virginia 10 19 821 858 965 1,040 1,095 1,173 1,236 1,295 1,315 Wisconsin 14 11 3,200 3,366 3,517 3,510 3,641 3,842 3,966 4,265 4,322 Wyoming 13 7 315 342 359 387 410 441 457 484 429 Nationwide 177 10 % 192,053 203,667 217,418 229,619 238,316 249,332 255,729 261,284 265,333 Mobile Telephone Facilities-based Carriers and Mobile Telephony Subscribers Subscribers (In Thousands) * Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. 2005 2006 2007 2008 Table 17 1 Percentage of mobile telephony subscribers purchasing their service subscriptions from a mobile wireless reseller. Jun 2009 Carriers % Resold 1 State U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 28 Zero 17.4 % 18.4 % 17.7 % 17.7 % 17.7 % 19.4 % 18.3 % 7.7 % 8.7 % One 10.5 11.4 11.3 11.1 11.1 11.7 11.6 9.2 10.1 Two 7.6 7.6 7.8 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.6 7.8 7.9 Three 6.0 6.2 6.2 6.7 6.7 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.1 Four 4.8 4.7 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 Five 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.4 4.4 3.9 4.1 4.8 4.6 Six 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.5 4.2 4.0 Seven 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.6 3.4 Eight 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.1 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.6 Ten or More 36.9 35.0 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 44.0 Zero 2.2 % 2.4 % 2.3 % 2.4 % 2.4 % 2.8 % 2.6 % 0.4 % 0.5 % One 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 1.2 Two 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 1.3 Three 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 1.4 Four 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.5 Five 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.4 Six 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.5 Seven 2.0 2.4 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.5 Eight 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.8 1.7 1.8 Nine 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.7 1.6 1.6 Ten or More 77.9 76.8 77.4 76.1 75.8 75.0 75.9 86.6 86.2 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. Jun Demographic data were created by geographically merging contemporaneous Tele Atlas ® Dynamap ® ZIP Code Boundary & Inventory Files with census block-level population data from the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Figures may not add to 100% due to rounding. 2 A holding company or common-control entity that reports both CLEC end-user switched access lines and interconnected VoIP subscribers in a state reports a single list of ZIP Codes in which it has any such customers and is counted once in each listed ZIP Code. Jun 2008 Number of Providers 2 Table 18 Percentage of ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers 1 Table 19 2009 Number of Providers 2 20072005 DecJunDecJunJun Dec 2006 DecJun Percentage of Households in ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers 1 2009 2008 DecJunDec 2007 DecJunJun JunDec 20062005 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 29 Alabama 5 % 19 % 7 % 5 % 4 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 51 % Alaska 58 26 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 Arizona 7 17 5 4 3 3 2 2 58 Arkansas 16 44 7 5 5 5 3 1 15 California 3 12 4 4 4 3 2 2 67 Colorado 14 25 4 2 3 3 3 1 45 Connecticut 07661064 753 Delaware 0327320 281 District of Columbia 4800000 0 Florida 0422122 285 Georgia 2 20 65432 24 Hawaii 6 19 16 8972 232 Idaho 14 41 49434 20 Illinois 6 31 96442 238 Indiana 4 24 97753 29 Iowa 21 49 64322 112 Kansas 22 34 56343 2 Kentucky 7 29 87664 330 Louisiana 3 23 26535 25 Maine 5 23 10 10 11 8 8 4 21 Maryland 1544533 472 Massachusetts 0421222 283 Michigan 1 12 46654 556 Minnesota 14 35 64433 230 Mississippi 1 13 55554 359 Missouri 21 36 54322 22 Montana 44 34 32232 210 Nebraska 31 48 32212 1 Nevada 8 21 55343 151 New Hampshire 1658658 57 New Jersey 0001111 293 New Mexico 23 36 54242 22 New York 1 12 44435 563 North Carolina 2 16 86354 45 North Dakota 45 45 32111 04 Ohio 0 12 77775 451 Oklahoma 17 35 33323 232 Oregon 11 32 46424 4 Pennsylvania 3 26 45344 246 Puerto Rico 0 5 10 8 9 13 24 17 13 Rhode Island 1883715 364 South Carolina 1 15 56442 30 South Dakota 39 47 22211 04 Tennessee 0 19 54543 55 Texas 7 21 43322 1 Utah 8 31 64524 140 Vermont 2 33 13 7884 619 Virginia 7 29 76443 336 Washington 4 26 62333 250 West Virginia 11 39 10 8744 21 Wisconsin 9 42 74433 126 Wyoming 15 52 94101 414 Nationwide 9 % 24 % 5 % 5 % 4 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 44 % Table 20 Number of Providers Nine Ten or More Six Seven EightZero One - Three Four State as of June 30, 2009 Percentage of ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers by State Five U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 30 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 31 Customer Response Publication: Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2009 You can help us provide the best possible information to the public by completing this form and returning it to the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of the FCC's Wireline Competition Bureau. 1. Please check the category that best describes you: ____ press ____ current telecommunications carrier ____ potential telecommunications carrier ____ business customer evaluating vendors/service options ____ consultant, law firm, lobbyist ____ other business customer ____ academic/student ____ residential customer ____ FCC employee ____ other federal government employee ____ state or local government employee ____ Other (please specify) 2. Please rate the report: Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor No opinion Data accuracy (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Data presentation (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Timeliness of data (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Completeness of data (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Text clarity (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Completeness of text (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) 3. Overall, how do you Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor No opinion rate this report? (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) 4. How can this report be improved? 5. May we contact you to discuss possible improvements? Name: Telephone #: To discuss the information in this report, contact: 202-418-0940 or for users of TTY equipment, call 202-418-0484 Fax this response to or Mail this response to 202-418-0520 FCC/WCB/IATD, Mail Stop 1600 F Washington, DC 20554