Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau March 2011 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. Copies may be purchased by contacting Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800) 378-3160, or via their website at www.bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2009 i Contents TEXT Introduction.............................................................................................................................................1 Wireline retail local telephone service....................................................................................................1 Service providers ....................................................................................................................................3 Interconnected VoIP service ...................................................................................................................6 Switched access lines..............................................................................................................................9 Wholesale relationships for switched access lines..................................................................................9 Remainder of the report ........................................................................................................................11 Technical Notes ....................................................................................................................................32 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................34 FIGURES 1. Interconnected VoIP Subscriptions and Retail Switched Access Lines, 2008 - 2010......................2 2. Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Technology and Customer Type .................................................................................................................................3 3. Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Customer Type and Regulatory Status .............................................................................................................................4 4. Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Technology, Regulatory Status, and Customer Type ..........................................................................................................................5 5. Interconnected VoIP Subscribership by Reported Service Features ................................................7 6. Technology of Internet Access Connections in Interconnected VoIP Broadband Bundles .............8 7. Technology of Retail Switched Access Lines ..................................................................................9 8. Wholesale Relationships as Reported Respectively by CLECs and ILECs ...................................10 TABLES 1. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions............................................................12 2. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Customer Type .............................13 3. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions Reported by Non-ILECs....................14 4. ILEC End-User (Retail) and Wholesale Switched Access Lines, VoIP Subscriptions, and UNEs .......................................................................................................................................15 5. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Type of Technology for Non-ILEC Providers.................................................................................................................16 6. Percentage of Switched Access Lines Presubscribed for Long Distance Service..........................17 7. Residential and Business Presubscribed Switched Access Lines...................................................18 8. Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State ....................................19 9. Residential End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State...........................20 10. Business End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State...............................21 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2009 ii 11. Non-ILEC Share of Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State...........................................................................................................................................22 12. Non-ILEC Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State ..................23 13. ILEC Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State ..........................24 14. Non-ILEC Methods of Providing Wireline Telephone Services by State .....................................25 15. Percentage of End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions Provided to Residential Customers by State......................................................................................................26 16. Number of Reporting ILECs, Non-ILECs, and VoIP Providers by State ......................................27 17. Mobile Telephone Facilities-based Carriers and Mobile Telephony Subscribers .........................28 18. Percentage of ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers............................................29 19. Percentage of Households in ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers ...................29 20. Percentage of ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers by State .............................30 CHARTS 1. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions............................................................12 2. Percent of Lines and VoIP Subscriptions that Serve Residential Customers.................................13 3. Non-ILEC End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions..........................................14 4. ILEC Total Lines and the Percent Provided to CLECs..................................................................15 5. End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Type of Technology for Non-ILEC Providers.................................................................................................................16 6. Percent Presubscribed Interstate Long Distance Lines for ILECs..................................................17 MAP Reporting Non-ILEC Interconnected VoIP Providers and CLECs by 5-Digit Geographical ZIP Code .......................................................................................................31 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 1 Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 Introduction. The Commission has used FCC Form 477 to collect subscribership information from telephone service providers – the incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs), competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), and mobile telephony providers – for more than a decade. 1,2 The Commission has required interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (“interconnected VoIP”) service providers to report subscribership information since December 2008 because the use of VoIP technology is growing rapidly and it increasingly is used to provide local telephone service. 3 This report summarizes information about telephone services as of June 30, 2010. It demonstrates that interconnected VoIP service subscribership has continued to increase while subscribership to traditional wired telephone services has declined. We also update summary statistics for the mobile telephony subscribership information collected by Form 477. 4 Wireline retail local telephone service. Retail local telephone service customers are served by two wireline technologies – “end-user” switched access lines and interconnected VoIP “subscriptions.” • In June 2010, there were 122 million end-user switched access lines in service and 29 million interconnected VoIP subscriptions in the United States, or 151 million wireline retail local telephone service connections in total. See Figure 1. 1 See the Technical Notes and the Glossary that appear at the end of this report for more-detailed information about the Form 477 and the meaning of terms used in this report. 2 For an overview of program history for the telephone services data, see Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2008 (June 2010) at pp. 1-2, available at http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html. Readers who are interested in historical trends in the data should note the changes in reporting requirements that were effective in 2008 and earlier, in 2005. 3 The FCC’s rules (at 47 C.F.R. § 9.3) state: An interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service is a service that: (1) Enables real-time, two-way voice communications; (2) Requires a broadband connection from the user’s location; (3) Requires Internet protocol-compatible customer premises equipment (CPE); and (4) Permits users generally to receive calls that originate on the public switched telephone network and to terminate calls to the public switched telephone network. We note that the current interpretation of element (4) of the definition excludes the VoIP services that Skype offers in the United States, and subscribers to those services are not reported on Form 477. Prior to the December 2008 data, companies such as Vonage that solely provide interconnected VoIP service did not file Form 477. Telephone companies and cable companies that provided local exchange telephone service were required to file Form 477 but were not required to report interconnected VoIP subscriptions. However, some of these companies chose to include interconnected VoIP subscriptions in the number of retail (end-user) switched access lines that they reported. 4 The presentation of mobile wireless telephone subscriber counts in this report does not constitute, or imply, Commission analysis of the extent to which wireline and mobile wireless telephone services are demand substitutes or complements in general or in any particular situation. In the Form 477 program, commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) carriers who own or operate wireless networks report both their retail telephone service customers and the retail customers of mobile wireless telephone service resellers. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 2 • Interconnected VoIP subscriptions had increased by 21% (from 24 million to 29 million) and retail switched access lines had decreased by 8% (from 133 million to 122 million) during the preceding year. The combined effect was an annual decrease of 4% in wireline retail local telephone service connections (from 157 million to 151 million). See Figure 1. Figure 1 Interconnected VoIP Subscriptions and Retail Switched Access Lines, 2008 - 2010 (In Thousands) 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 Interconnected VoIP Subscriptions 21,744 23,928 25,923 28,895 Retail Switched Access Lines 141,019 133,093 127,041 122,275 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 Dec 2009 Jun 2010 • Of the 151 million wireline retail local telephone service connections in June 2010, 90 million (or 59%) were residential connections and 61 million (or 41%) were business connections. See Figure 2. • Cross-classified by technology and customer type, the 151 million wireline retail local telephone service connections in June 2010 were: 43% residential switched access lines, 38% business switched access lines, 17% residential interconnected VoIP subscriptions, and 2% business interconnected VoIP subscriptions. See Figure 2. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 3 Figure 2 Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Technology and Customer Type as of June 30, 2010 (In Thousands) Switched Access Interconnected Total Lines VoIP Residential 64,523 25,231 89,753 Business 57,753 3,665 61,417 Total 122,275 28,895 151,171 Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. Switched, Residential 43% VoIP, Residential 17% Switched, Business 38% VoIP, Business 2% Service providers. The Form 477 program – and this report – distinguishes ILEC operations from all other operations. • Cross-classified by customer type (residential or business) and the service retailer’s regulatory status (ILEC or non-ILEC), the 151 million wireline retail local telephone service connections (including both switched access lines and interconnected VoIP subscriptions) in June 2010 were: 41% ILEC residential service, 27% ILEC business service, 19% non-ILEC residential service, and 14% non-ILEC business service. See Figure 3. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 4 Figure 3 Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Customer Type and Regulatory Status as of June 30, 2010 (In Thousands) Residential Business Total ILEC 61,574 40,814 102,388 Non-ILEC 28,179 20,603 48,782 Total 89,753 61,417 151,171 Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. ILEC, Residential 41% Non-ILEC, Residential 19% ILEC, Business 27% Non-ILEC, Business 14% • Additionally cross-classified by technology, the 90 million wireline residential connections in June 2010 were: 66.7% ILEC switched access lines, 26.2% non-ILEC interconnected VoIP subscriptions, 5.2% non-ILEC switched access lines, and 1.9% ILEC interconnected VoIP subscriptions. Similarly, the 61 million wireline business connections were: 66.0% ILEC switched access lines, 28.0% non-ILEC switched access lines, 5.5% non-ILEC interconnected VoIP subscriptions, and 0.5% ILEC interconnected VoIP subscriptions. See Figure 4. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 5 Figure 4 Wireline Retail Local Telephone Service Connections by Technology, Regulatory Status, and Customer Type as of June 30, 2010 (In Thousands) Total Switched Access Interconnected Total Lines VoIP ILEC 100,426 1,962 102,388 Non-ILEC 21,849 26,933 48,782 Total 122,275 28,895 151,171 Residential ILEC 59,895 1,680 61,574 Non-ILEC 4,628 23,552 28,179 Residential Total 64,523 25,231 89,753 Business ILEC 40,531 283 40,814 Non-ILEC 17,221 3,382 20,603 Business Total 57,753 3,665 61,417 Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. Residential ILEC, Switched 66.7% ILEC, VoIP 1.9% Non-ILEC, Switched 5.2% Non-ILEC, VoIP 26.2% Business ILEC, Switched 66.0% Non-ILEC, Switched 28.0% Non-ILEC, VoIP 5.5% ILEC, VoIP 0.5% U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 6 Interconnected VoIP service. Form 477 identifies three types of information about retail interconnected VoIP service. • First, interconnected VoIP service retailers distinguish between the interconnected VoIP subscriptions they sell to their broadband Internet access service customers (“broadband bundle” subscriptions, in this report) and all the other interconnected VoIP subscriptions that they sell (“standalone” subscriptions). • Second, filers report whether or not interconnected VoIP subscriptions include, as a service feature, the capability to use the service over any broadband connection to which the customer has access, for example, at a hotel or vacation residence (“nomadic” functionality). • Third, filers identify the different broadband technologies (for example, cable modem Internet access service) in the broadband bundle. The Form 477 data cross-classify the first two of these three sets of information. See Figure 5. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 7 Figure 5 Interconnected VoIP Subscribership by Reported Service Features as of June 30, 2010 (In Thousands) Total Broadband Standalone Total Bundle VoIP Nomadic 484 2,774 3,258 Not nomadic 23,749 1,889 25,637 Total 24,233 4,663 28,895 ILEC Nomadic 15 6 21 Not nomadic 1,939 1 1,940 ILEC Total 1,954 8 1,962 Non-ILEC Nomadic 469 2,767 3,236 Not nomadic 21,810 1,887 23,697 Non-ILEC Total 22,278 4,655 26,933 Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. ILEC Bundle, Nomadic 0.8% Standalone, Nomadic 0.3% Bundle, Not nomadic 98.8% Standalone, Not nomadic 0.1% Non-ILEC Bundle, Nomadic 1.7% S tandalone, Nomadic 10.3% Bundle, Not nomadic 81.0% Standalone, Not nomadic 7.0% U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 8 Form 477 collects the third type of information about retail interconnected VoIP service – the technology of the Internet access connection – for broadband bundles but not for standalone interconnected VoIP. See Figure 6. 5 Figure 6 Technology of Internet Access Connections in Interconnected VoIP Broadband Bundles as of June 30, 2010 (In Thousands) Technology ILEC Non-ILEC Total DSL or Other Wireline 1,566 1,402 2,969 FTTP 387 182 569 Cable Modem 1 20,473 20,474 Terrestrial Fixed Wireless # 33 33 Other 0 188 188 Total 1,954 22,278 24,233 # = Rounds to zero. Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. ILEC Cable Modem 0.1% FTTP 19.8% DSL or Other Wireline 80.2% Non-ILEC DSL or Other Wireline 6.3% FTTP 0.8% Cable Modem 91.9% Terrestrial Fixed Wi re l e ss 0.1% Other 0.8% 5 Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 (February 2011) discusses types of Internet access connections in greater detail. The report is available at http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 9 Switched access lines. ILECs as a group predominantly deliver retail switched access lines over copper local loops. This appears also to be the case for those non-ILECs who report retail switched access lines. See Figure 7. Figure 7 Technology of Retail Switched Access Lines as of June 30, 2010 (In Thousands) Technology ILEC Non-ILEC Total FTTP 4,224 2,323 6,546 Coaxial Cable 152 2,314 2,466 Terrestrial Fixed Wireless 5 64 69 Other (copper local loop) 96,045 17,149 113,194 Total 100,426 21,849 122,275 Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. ILEC Other 95.6% Coaxial Cable 0.2% FTTP 4.2% Non-ILEC FTTP 10.6% Coaxial Cable 10.6% Terrestrial Fixed Wireless 0.3% Other 78.5% Wholesale relationships for switched access lines. ILECs typically own the communications facilities over which they provide retail services. By contrast, CLECs use a range of methods: equipping ILEC UNE loops (“UNE-L”) as CLEC switched access lines, 6 reselling services (for example, reselling ILEC 6 CLECs (as opposed to non-ILECs more generally) have certain regulatory rights to obtain ILEC local loops at cost-based UNE rates, which the CLEC may use to provide retail switched access lines or retail broadband Internet access connections. See C.F.R. § 51.307. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 10 switched access lines obtained at wholesale rates or reselling ILEC lines obtained under commercial agreements that replaced the UNE-Platform (“UNE-P”)), equipping leased ILEC special access circuits as switched access lines, and equipping local loops that the CLEC owns. • CLECs reported using several methods to provide their 22 million retail switched access lines in June 2010. They reported providing 37% of lines (or about 8.1 million lines) by reselling ILEC wholesale or retail services. They reported providing 34% of lines (or about 7.4 million lines) over ILEC facilities leased at regulated, cost-based rates (that is, as unbundled network elements, or UNEs). And they provided the remaining 29% of lines (or about 6.3 million lines) over local loops that they owned. However, the information about wholesale relationships differs as reported by CLECs and by ILECs, as discussed in Figure 8. Figure 8 Wholesale Relationships as Reported Respectively by CLECs and ILECs as of June 30, 2010 (In Thousands) CLEC ILEC Difference Retail Switched Access Lines provisioned over ILEC Services (reported by CLECs) Wholesale Switched Access Lines and UNEs provided to CLECs (reported by ILECs) Resold ILEC services 1 8,061 5,028 3,033 UNE-P 2 1,338 127 1,210 UNE-L 3 6,105 3,254 2,851 Total ILEC UNEs 7,443 3,381 4,062 Total ILEC services 15,503 8,408 7,095 Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. 1 Resold ILEC services include switched access lines made available to CLECs at wholesale rates, resold Centrex, Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN), or other ILEC services, ILEC special access circuits channelized to provide CLEC retail switched access lines, and ILEC switched access lines provided to CLECs under commercial agreements that replaced UNE-P. (See note 2, below.) Filers are instructed to count the number of voice-grade channels the retail customer purchased, not the theoretical capacity of the circuit over which the service was delivered. ILECs generally do not know (and do not report) which ILEC leased special access circuits or other high-capacity circuits are being used to provide CLEC retail switched access lines (which the CLECs do report). 2 UNE-P was the combination of ILEC loop UNE, switching UNE, and transport UNE. The Commission directed CLECs to migrate their retail customers served by UNE-P to an alternative arrangement within 12 months of the effective data of the Triennial Review Remand Order, that is, by March 11, 2006. See C.F.R. § 51.319(d)(2)(ii). 3 ILECs report the number of UNE-L they provide to CLECs but do not convert any high-capacity UNE-L, such as DS1 UNE loops, into voice-grade equivalents. By contrast, CLECs report the number of switched access lines their retail customers purchase which the CLEC provisioned over UNE-L obtained from ILECs. Note, however, that a CLEC might use UNE-L only to provide broadband Internet access connections. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 11 Remainder of the report. The remainder of the report consists of tables and charts that update and expand data presented in earlier reports in this series. We present national data first, followed by state- specific data and, finally, summary statistics of service-provider presence in individual ZIP Codes. 7 * * * * We invite users of this information to provide suggestions for improved analysis of data presented in this report by using the attached customer response form or by e-mailing comments to IATDreports@fcc.gov for subject: June 2010 local telephone data. We encourage users of this information to provide suggestions for improved data collection by participating in any formal proceedings undertaken by the Commission to solicit comments for improvement of FCC Form 477. 7 The appropriate interpretation of the ZIP Code-based information is discussed in the Technical Notes at the end of the report. ILEC Non-ILEC Jun 2005 143,758 33,975 177,733 19.1 Dec 2005 143,773 31,388 175,161 17.9 Jun 2006 142,293 29,896 172,189 17.4 Dec 2006 138,834 28,626 167,460 17.1 Jun 2007 134,640 28,729 163,369 17.6 Dec 2007 129,693 28,725 158,418 18.1 Jun 2008 124,606 30,049 154,655 19.4 Dec 2008 118,496 44,267 162,763 27.2 Jun 2009 112,748 44,273 157,021 28.2 Dec 2009 107,019 45,945 152,963 30.0 Jun 2010 102,388 48,782 151,171 32.3 Total Non-ILEC Share (In Millions) Table 1 End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions 1 End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions Chart 1 (In Thousands) 1 Mandatory reporting by interconnected VoIP service providers started in December 2008. Previously, individual ILECs and CLECs included VoIP subscribers in reported switched access lines to a varying and largely unknown degree. Interconnected VoIP is distinguished from VoIP service more generally by permitting users to receive calls that originate on the public switched telephone network and to terminate calls to the public switched telephone network. See 47 C.F.R. § 9.3. Form 477 counts both switched access lines and interconnected VoIP subscriptions as the maximum number of calls that may be active, simultaneously, from the end user’s location under the purchased service plan. Provided by Some data for December 2008, June 2009, and December 2009 have been revised. Date 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 ILEC Non-ILEC Non-ILEC 34.0 31.4 29.9 28.6 28.7 28.7 30.0 44.3 44.3 45.9 48.8 ILEC 143.8 143.8 142.3 138.8 134.6 129.7 124.6 118.5 112.7 107.0 102.4 Jun 2005 Dec 2005 Jun 2006 Dec 2006 Jun 2007 Dec 2007 Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 Dec 2009 Jun 2010 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 12 Jun 2005 95,316 48,442 66.3 16,338 17,637 48.1 Dec 2005 94,393 49,381 65.7 13,873 17,515 44.2 Jun 2006 92,453 49,840 65.0 12,474 17,422 41.7 Dec 2006 89,167 49,667 64.2 12,211 16,415 42.7 Jun 2007 85,633 49,007 63.6 12,117 16,612 42.2 Dec 2007 81,798 47,894 63.1 12,051 16,675 42.0 Jun 2008 77,457 47,149 62.2 12,396 17,654 41.3 Dec 2008 72,786 45,711 61.4 25,049 19,218 56.6 Jun 2009 68,582 44,166 60.8 24,768 19,505 55.9 Dec 2009 64,613 42,405 60.4 26,849 19,096 58.4 Jun 2010 61,574 40,814 60.1 28,179 20,603 57.8 Percent of Lines and VoIP Subscriptions that Serve Residential Customers 1 Chart 2 % ResidentialBusiness 1 The December 2008 data are the first for which comprehensive reporting of interconnected VoIP subscribers was required. See footnote 1, Table 1. Some data for December 2008, June 2009, and December 2009 have been revised. Table 2 End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Customer Type 1 Reporting Non-ILECsReporting ILECs Date (In Thousands) Business Residential % Residential Residential 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% ILECs Non-ILECs ILECs 66.3% 65.7% 65.0% 64.2% 63.6% 63.1% 62.2% 61.4% 60.8% 60.4% 60.1% Non-ILECs 48.1% 44.2% 41.7% 42.7% 42.2% 42.0% 41.3% 56.6% 55.9% 58.4% 57.8% Jun 2005 Dec 2005 Jun 2006 Dec 2006 Jun 2007 Dec 2007 Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 Dec 2009 Jun 2010 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 13 326 33,975 5,826 19,025 9,124 - 17.1 56.0 26.9 - 382 31,388 6,704 14,521 10,163 - 21.4 46.3 32.4 - 400 29,896 6,548 12,547 10,802 - 21.9 42.0 36.1 - 397 28,626 5,819 11,663 11,144 - 20.3 40.7 38.9 - 406 28,729 6,193 11,511 11,025 - 21.6 40.1 38.4 - 443 28,725 6,430 10,582 11,713 - 22.4 36.8 40.8 - 469 30,049 6,073 10,884 13,093 - 20.2 36.2 43.6 - 705 44,267 7,083 9,612 6,359 21,216 16.0 21.7 14.4 47.9 717 44,273 6,841 8,461 6,002 22,970 15.5 19.1 13.6 51.9 753 45,945 7,101 8,025 6,089 24,728 15.5 17.5 13.3 53.8 778 48,782 8,061 7,443 6,345 26,933 16.5 15.3 13.0 55.2 3 Lines provided over CLEC-owned "last-mile" facilities. Dec 2009 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. CLEC- owned local loops Dec 2005 Some data for December 2008, June 2009, and December 2009 have been revised. Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Jun 2006 VoIP Non-ILEC End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions as of June 30, 2010 Jun 2009 Dec 2008 Reporting Non- ILECs End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions Chart 3 Jun 2008 2 Includes unbundled network element (UNE) loops leased from an unaffiliated ILEC on a stand-alone basis and also UNE loops leased in combination with UNE switching or any other unbundled network element. Table 3 End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions Reported by Non-ILECs 1 (Lines and Subscriptions in Thousands) Acquired from other LECs Percent CLEC- owned local loops 3 End-User Switched Access Lines VoIP ILEC UNEs Resold LEC service Resold LEC service ILEC UNEs 2 Date Jun 2010 Jun 2007 Dec 2006 Jun 2005 Dec 2007 Resold LEC service 16.5% ILEC UNEs 15.3% CLEC-owned local loops 13.0% VoIP 55.2% U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 14 Jun 2005 757 164,449 143,758 - 1,796 4,300 14,596 18,895 20,691 12.6 Dec 2005 807 160,881 143,773 - 1,793 4,469 10,846 15,315 17,108 10.6 Jun 2006 805 156,872 142,293 - 1,723 4,413 8,443 12,856 14,579 9.3 Dec 2006 814 151,958 138,834 - 1,613 4,408 7,103 11,511 13,124 8.6 Jun 2007 816 146,672 134,640 - 1,517 4,285 6,230 10,515 12,032 8.2 Dec 2007 805 140,808 129,693 - 1,460 4,122 5,534 9,655 11,115 7.9 Jun 2008 800 134,846 124,606 - 1,473 3,827 4,941 8,768 10,241 7.6 Dec 2008 777 128,288 117,968 529 3,209 3,844 2,740 6,583 9,792 7.6 Jun 2009 778 121,884 111,790 958 3,012 3,580 2,543 6,123 9,136 7.5 Dec 2009 768 116,075 105,824 1,195 2,993 3,668 2,396 6,063 9,056 7.8 Jun 2010 766 110,797 100,426 1,962 5,028 3,254 127 3,381 8,408 7.6 ILEC Total Lines and the Percent Provided to CLECs ILEC Total Lines 3 Without Switching VoIP Total UNEs & Resold Lines Resold Lines With Switching 4 Total UNEs 3 Sum of ILEC-reported end-user (retail) switched access lines, ILEC interconnected VoIP subscriptions, and ILEC wholesale switched acces lines and UNEs provided to CLECs. Some data for December 2009 have been revised. Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Table 4 ILEC End-User (Retail) and Wholesale Switched Access Lines, VoIP Subscriptions, and UNEs 1 (Lines, Subscriptions, and UNEs in Thousands) UNEs Date End-User Switched Access Lines Reporting ILECs 2 % of Total Lines Switched Access Lines and UNEs Provided to CLECs 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. Chart 4 2 Fewer ILECs were counted after mid-year 2007 primarily because FCC staff identified additional common-control relationships. 4 ILEC loops provided with ILEC switching, including the combination of ILEC loop UNE, switching UNE, and transport UNE, collectively referred to as the UNE-Platform ("UNE-P"). In the Triennial Review Remand Order, which was adopted on December 15, 2004, the Commission directed CLECs to migrate their retail customers served by these methods to alternative arrangements by March 11, 2006, i.e., within 12 months of the date the order went into effect. See C.F.R. § 51.319(d)(2)(ii). 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 Jun 2005 Dec 2005 Jun 2006 Dec 2006 Jun 2007 Dec 2007 Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 Dec 2009 Jun 2010 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% ILEC Total Lines Percent Provided to CLECs U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 15 Table 5 End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Type of Technology for Non-ILEC Providers 1 (In Thousands) Date Coaxial Cable 2 Other Technology Total Jun 2005 4,571 29,404 33,975 13.5 Dec 2005 5,100 26,287 31,388 16.2 Jun 2006 6,070 23,826 29,896 20.3 Dec 2006 6,751 21,875 28,626 23.6 Jun 2007 7,730 21,000 28,729 26.9 Dec 2007 8,385 20,340 28,725 29.2 Jun 2008 9,352 20,697 30,049 31.1 Dec 2008 20,108 24,158 44,267 45.4 Jun 2009 21,547 22,726 44,273 48.7 Dec 2009 23,235 22,710 45,945 50.6 Jun 2010 24,636 24,146 48,782 50.5 (In Thousands) 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. 2 Reported end-user switched access lines and interconnected VoIP connections that terminate on coaxial cable at the end user's premises. Starting, systematically, with the December 2008 data, interconnected VoIP service providers report subscriptions they sold in a bundle with cable modem Internet access service. For December 2008 and later dates, FCC staff used other Form 477 data to estimate the number of standalone VoIP subscriptions that terminated on coaxial cable at the end user's premises. Percent Coaxial Cable End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by Type of Technology for Non-ILEC Providers Chart 5 Some data for December 2008, June 2009, and December 2009 have been revised. 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Jun 2005 Dec 2005 Jun 2006 Dec 2006 Jun 2007 Dec 2007 Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 Dec 2009 Jun 2010 Coaxial Cable Other Technology U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 16 Table 6 Percentage of Switched Access Lines Presubscribed for Long Distance Service RBOC Other ILEC ILEC Total CLEC Total Residential Jun 2006 59 58 59 85 62 Dec 2006 66 60 65 86 68 Jun 2007 66 61 65 86 68 Dec 2007 66 63 65 87 68 Jun 2008 66 64 66 88 69 Dec 2008 69 65 68 80 69 Jun 2009 70 66 69 80 70 Dec 2009 71 68 70 76 71 Jun 2010 71 68 70 76 71 Business Jun 2006 38 37 38 69 46 Dec 2006 47 39 46 68 51 Jun 2007 49 42 48 72 54 Dec 2007 50 43 49 70 54 Jun 2008 49 44 49 72 55 Dec 2008 44 47 44 70 51 Jun 2009 42 49 43 72 51 Dec 2009 43 48 43 71 51 Jun 2010 43 51 44 73 53 Total Jun 2006 51 52 51 76 56 Dec 2006 59 54 58 76 61 Jun 2007 59 56 59 78 62 Dec 2007 60 57 59 77 63 Jun 2008 60 58 59 79 63 Dec 2008 59 60 59 73 61 Jun 2009 58 61 59 74 61 Dec 2009 59 62 60 72 62 Jun 2010 59 63 60 74 62 Chart 6 Percent Presubscribed Interstate Long Distance Lines for ILECs RBOC is an acronym for Regional Bell Operating Company. They currently are AT&T, Qwest, and Verizon. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Jun 2006 Dec 2006 Jun 2007 Dec 2007 Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 Dec 2009 Jun 2010 Residential Business U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 17 Table 7 Residential and Business Presubscribed Switched Access Lines RBOC Other ILEC ILEC Total CLEC Total Residential Presubscribed 32,864 9,320 42,183 3,535 45,718 Not Presubscribed 13,379 4,333 17,712 1,093 18,804 All Lines 46,242 13,653 59,895 4,628 64,523 Percent Presubscribed 71% 68% 70% 76% 71% Business Presubscribed 14,933 2,967 17,899 12,614 30,514 Not Presubscribed 19,838 2,794 22,632 4,607 27,239 All Lines 34,771 5,760 40,531 17,221 57,753 Percent Presubscribed 43% 51% 44% 73% 53% Total Presubscribed 47,796 12,286 60,083 16,149 76,232 Not Presubscribed 33,217 7,127 40,344 5,700 46,043 All Lines 81,013 19,413 100,426 21,849 122,275 Percent Presubscribed 59% 63% 60% 74% 62% RBOC Other ILEC ILEC Total CLEC Total Residential Presubscribed 35,363 9,414 44,777 3,851 48,628 Not Presubscribed 14,402 4,452 18,854 1,190 20,044 All Lines 49,765 13,866 63,631 5,041 68,672 Percent Presubscribed 71% 68% 70% 76% 71% Business Presubscribed 15,389 2,895 18,283 11,501 29,784 Not Presubscribed 20,757 3,153 23,910 4,675 28,585 All Lines 36,146 6,047 42,193 16,176 58,369 Percent Presubscribed 43% 48% 43% 71% 51% Total Presubscribed 50,752 12,309 63,060 15,352 78,412 Not Presubscribed 35,159 7,605 42,764 5,865 48,629 All Lines 85,910 19,914 105,824 21,217 127,041 Percent Presubscribed 59% 62% 60% 72% 62% Some data for December 2009 have been revised. Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. (In Thousands) June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 RBOC is an acronym for Regional Bell Operating Company. They currently are AT&T, Qwest, and Verizon. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 18 Alabama 1,494 0 12 1,506 325 65 183 573 2,079 28 Alaska 271 0 0 271 * 1 **** American Samoa 10 0 0 10 0000100 Arizona 1,561 1 1 1,563 829 100 313 1,242 2,805 44 Arkansas 883 0 21 904 120 21 100 242 1,146 21 California 13,798 1 319 14,118 2,296 504 2,336 5,136 19,254 27 Colorado 1,569 0 0 1,569 391 89 412 892 2,461 36 Connecticut 1,266 # 60 1,326 219 55 431 705 2,031 35 Delaware 321 # 10 331 68 * * 173 504 34 District of Columbia 677 # 3 680 117 15 51 182 862 21 Florida 6,008 # 130 6,138 1,326 455 1,655 3,435 9,574 36 Georgia 2,963 # 48 3,011 635 172 515 1,322 4,333 31 Guam 48 0 0 48 ****** Hawaii 455 # # 455 44 * * 128 583 22 Idaho 486 # # 486 101 11 46 158 645 25 Illinois 4,415 # 165 4,581 646 255 760 1,661 6,241 27 Indiana 2,113 # 72 2,186 240 88 320 649 2,834 23 Iowa 987 # # 987 191 124 29 344 1,331 26 Kansas 797 0 23 820 228 30 172 429 1,249 34 Kentucky 1,312 # 5 1,317 258 27 236 520 1,837 28 Louisiana 1,417 0 9 1,426 290 49 248 586 2,013 29 Maine 463 0 0 463 141 14 126 282 745 38 Maryland 2,284 # 49 2,333 476 108 359 943 3,277 29 Massachusetts 2,106 # 43 2,149 725 142 822 1,689 3,838 44 Michigan 2,802 # 150 2,952 471 237 1,030 1,738 4,690 37 Minnesota 1,666 0 # 1,666 516 90 319 925 2,592 36 Mississippi 845 0 3 848 149 19 85 253 1,100 23 Missouri 2,101 0 61 2,162 259 77 261 597 2,759 22 Montana 342 # # 342 44 8 57 109 452 24 Nebraska 521 0 # 521 199 26 106 330 851 39 Nevada 802 # 7 809 147 62 241 449 1,258 36 New Hampshire 366 0 0 366 147 40 201 388 754 51 New Jersey 3,036 1 76 3,112 802 150 1,185 2,137 5,249 41 New Mexico 651 0 0 651 78 16 62 156 807 19 New York 5,590 1 62 5,653 1,852 220 2,711 4,783 10,437 46 North Carolina 3,026 # 19 3,045 503 113 707 1,324 4,369 30 North Dakota 220 0 0 220 86 2 38 126 345 36 Northern Mariana Isl. 16 0 0 16 0000160 Ohio 3,629 1 90 3,719 687 91 879 1,657 5,376 31 Oklahoma 1,050 0 20 1,070 288 50 234 572 1,642 35 Oregon 1,079 # 1 1,080 253 59 301 614 1,693 36 Pennsylvania 4,511 1 60 4,571 1,184 226 910 2,321 6,892 34 Puerto Rico 706 0 0 706 * * 99 244 950 26 Rhode Island 258 # 6 264 220 * * 308 572 54 South Carolina 1,415 # 14 1,429 313 54 255 622 2,051 30 South Dakota 227 0 0 227 133 4 52 188 415 45 Tennessee 1,941 0 21 1,962 423 75 395 893 2,856 31 Texas 7,377 # 301 7,678 1,140 243 1,058 2,441 10,119 24 Utah 650 0 0 650 181 34 143 359 1,009 36 Vermont 265 0 0 265 49 * * 109 374 29 Virgin Islands 59 0 0 59 0 * 0 * * * Virginia 2,910 # 34 2,944 1,016 152 408 1,577 4,521 35 Washington 1,960 # 2 1,962 393 119 644 1,157 3,119 37 West Virginia 605 # 1 606 50 17 109 176 782 22 Wisconsin 1,913 # 56 1,970 320 55 353 728 2,697 27 Wyoming 183 # # 183 12 6 39 58 241 24 Nationwide 100,426 8 1,954 102,388 21,849 4,655 22,278 48,782 151,171 32 Stand- alone Non-ILECs VoIP purchased asVoIP purchased as Stand- alone Switched Access Lines # = Rounds to zero. * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Bundled with Internet Total ILECs Switched Access Lines Table 8 Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State as of June 30, 2010 (In Thousands) Non-ILEC % of Total State Total Total Bundled with Internet U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 19 Alabama 984 0 11 994 106 61 161 328 1,322 25 Alaska 136 0 0 136 * 1 **** American Samoa 5005000050 Arizona 933 # 0 933 441 78 227 745 1,678 44 Arkansas 556 0 20 576 22 19 82 122 698 17 California 7,644 1 263 7,909 615 425 1,768 2,809 10,718 26 Colorado 984 0 0 984 23 79 337 440 1,423 31 Connecticut 724 # 57 781 53 48 401 502 1,283 39 Delaware 185 # 9 194 7 * * 105 300 35 District of Columbia 133 # # 133 15 12 31 57 191 30 Florida 3,654 # 110 3,764 93 393 1,420 1,905 5,670 34 Georgia 1,758 # 34 1,791 118 155 429 701 2,493 28 Guam 250025****** Hawaii 252 0 0 252 # * * 81 333 24 Idaho 310 # 0 310 22 9 34 65 375 17 Illinois 2,343 # 141 2,484 76 235 683 994 3,478 29 Indiana 1,311 # 66 1,377 67 79 292 438 1,814 24 Iowa 657 # # 657 81 120 8 209 866 24 Kansas 457 0 21 478 101 23 132 257 734 35 Kentucky 832 # 4 836 126 23 217 366 1,202 30 Louisiana 860 0 7 867 105 43 206 353 1,220 29 Maine 365 0 0 365 13 12 120 146 511 29 Maryland 1,265 # 44 1,309 82 96 329 506 1,815 28 Massachusetts 1,180 # 36 1,216 67 127 757 952 2,168 44 Michigan 1,528 # 133 1,661 137 220 982 1,339 3,000 45 Minnesota 1,145 0 # 1,145 93 85 269 446 1,591 28 Mississippi 517 0 2 519 35 17 81 133 652 20 Missouri 1,343 0 57 1,400 40 70 210 321 1,720 19 Montana 219 # # 219 14 8 48 70 290 24 Nebraska 299 0 0 299 102 13 58 173 472 37 Nevada 460 # 6 466 5 53 204 263 729 36 New Hampshire 276 0 0 276 5 36 188 229 504 45 New Jersey 1,682 1 62 1,745 93 131 1,083 1,307 3,052 43 New Mexico 433 0 0 433 9 15 46 70 503 14 New York 3,193 1 48 3,242 259 173 2,499 2,931 6,173 47 North Carolina 1,890 # 12 1,902 46 100 653 799 2,701 30 North Dakota 149 0 0 149 45 2 32 80 229 35 Northern Mariana Isl. 9009000090 Ohio 2,250 1 76 2,326 231 71 814 1,116 3,442 32 Oklahoma 648 0 19 667 151 37 188 376 1,043 36 Oregon 727 # 0 727 19 52 268 339 1,066 32 Pennsylvania 2,993 1 52 3,046 149 195 827 1,171 4,217 28 Puerto Rico 544 0 0 544 * * 87 102 646 16 Rhode Island 159 # 6 166 111 * * 180 346 52 South Carolina 935 # 9 943 72 44 218 334 1,277 26 South Dakota 143 0 0 143 85 4 40 129 272 48 Tennessee 1,260 0 17 1,277 71 68 327 466 1,743 27 Texas 4,294 # 272 4,566 159 205 958 1,321 5,887 22 Utah 409 0 0 409 21 30 120 171 579 29 Vermont 203 0 0 203 6 * * 63 265 24 Virgin Islands 36 0 0 36 0 * 0 * * * Virginia 1,658 # 26 1,685 237 124 350 711 2,395 30 Washington 1,266 # 0 1,266 37 107 587 731 1,997 37 West Virginia 456 # 0 456 6 15 106 127 583 22 Wisconsin 1,127 # 51 1,178 65 49 341 455 1,634 28 Wyoming 95 # # 95 4 6 34 44 139 32 Nationwide 59,895 7 1,673 61,574 4,628 4,040 19,512 28,179 89,753 31 Non-ILECs Stand- alone Bundled with Internet Stand- alone Bundled with Internet Total Switched Access Lines VoIP purchased as Total # = Rounds to zero. * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Table 9 Residential End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State as of June 30, 2010 (In Thousands) State ILECs Total Non-ILEC % of Total Switched Access Lines VoIP purchased as U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 20 Alabama 510 0 2 512 219 4 22 244 756 32% Alaska 135 0 0 135 * # * * * * American Samoa 5005000050 Arizona 628 1 1 630 388 23 87 498 1,127 44 Arkansas 327 0 1 328 99 3 18 120 447 27 California 6,153 0 55 6,209 1,681 79 567 2,327 8,536 27 Colorado 586 0 0 586 368 10 74 452 1,038 44 Connecticut 542 0 3 545 166 7 30 203 748 27 Delaware 136 0 1 137 61 * * 67 205 33 District of Columbia 544 0 2 547 102 3 20 125 672 19 Florida 2,353 0 21 2,374 1,233 62 236 1,530 3,904 39 Georgia 1,205 0 15 1,220 517 17 86 620 1,840 34 Guam 23 0 0 23 * 0 * * * * Hawaii 203 # # 204 44 * * 47 250 19 Idaho 176 # # 176 79 2 13 94 270 35 Illinois 2,073 0 24 2,096 570 20 76 667 2,763 24 Indiana 803 # 6 809 174 9 28 211 1,020 21 Iowa 330 # # 330 111 4 21 135 465 29 Kansas 341 0 2 342 126 6 40 173 515 34 Kentucky 479 # 1 481 132 4 18 154 634 24 Louisiana 558 0 2 559 185 6 42 233 792 29 Maine 97 0 0 97 128 2 6 136 234 58 Maryland 1,019 0 5 1,024 394 12 31 437 1,461 30 Massachusetts 926 0 6 933 658 15 65 737 1,670 44 Michigan 1,274 0 17 1,291 334 16 48 399 1,690 24 Minnesota 522 0 # 522 423 6 50 479 1,001 48 Mississippi 328 0 1 329 113 2 4 119 448 27 Missouri 758 0 4 763 218 7 51 276 1,039 27 Montana 123 0 0 123 30 1 8 39 162 24 Nebraska 221 0 # 221 97 12 48 157 378 42 Nevada 343 0 1 343 141 8 37 186 530 35 New Hampshire 91 0 0 91 142 4 13 159 249 64 New Jersey 1,354 0 13 1,367 709 18 103 830 2,197 38 New Mexico 218 0 0 218 69 2 16 87 305 28 New York 2,398 0 14 2,412 1,594 47 212 1,852 4,264 43 North Carolina 1,136 0 7 1,143 457 13 54 525 1,668 31 North Dakota 71 0 0 71 41 # 5 46 117 39 Northern Mariana Isl. 7007000070 Ohio 1,379 0 14 1,393 456 20 65 541 1,934 28 Oklahoma 402 0 1 403 137 13 46 196 600 33 Oregon 352 0 1 353 234 8 33 275 628 44 Pennsylvania 1,518 0 7 1,525 1,035 31 83 1,149 2,675 43 Puerto Rico 162 0 0 162 * * 11 143 304 47 Rhode Island 98 0 # 99 109 * * 127 226 56 South Carolina 480 0 6 486 242 9 37 288 774 37 South Dakota 84 0 0 84 48 # 11 59 144 41 Tennessee 681 0 4 685 353 7 68 428 1,113 38 Texas 3,083 # 30 3,112 981 39 100 1,120 4,232 26 Utah 241 0 0 241 160 4 23 188 429 44 Vermont 62 0 0 62 43 * * 47 109 43 Virgin Islands 22 0 0 22 0 * 0 * * * Virginia 1,252 # 7 1,259 779 28 59 866 2,125 41 Washington 694 # 2 696 356 12 57 425 1,122 38 West Virginia 149 0 1 150 43 2 3 49 199 25 Wisconsin 786 0 5 791 255 6 12 273 1,064 26 Wyoming 88 0 # 88 8 1 5 14 102 13 Nationwide 40,531 1 281 40,814 17,221 615 2,767 20,603 61,417 34 Non-ILECs Stand- alone Bundled with Internet Stand- alone Bundled with Internet Total Switched Access Lines VoIP purchased as Total # = Rounds to zero. * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Table 10 Business End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State as of June 30, 2010 (In Thousands) State ILECs Total Non-ILEC % of Total Switched Access Lines VoIP purchased as U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 21 Alabama 16 % 13 % 13 % 14 % 16 % 21 % 21 % 24 % 28 % Alaska 26 **** **** American Samoa 00000 0000 Arizona 30 32 33 34 37 40 40 42 44 Arkansas 12 13 14 14 14 18 19 19 21 California 13 14 14 14 15 22 23 25 27 Colorado 19 17 17 16 19 31 32 34 36 Connecticut 12 12 13 14 15 29 31 33 35 Delaware 18 18 19 17 18 30 31 32 34 District of Columbia 14 14 14 14 15 20 20 21 21 Florida 15 13 13 13 14 27 28 31 36 Georgia 19 14 16 16 17 25 26 27 31 Guam 0 0 0 * * * * * * Hawaii 9 11 13 16 18 18 19 21 22 Idaho 11 10 11 11 11 17 17 19 25 Illinois 15 15 14 14 14 24 24 25 27 Indiana 10 10 9 9 11 18 19 20 23 Iowa 15 16 17 18 19 22 22 24 26 Kansas 24 23 25 26 28 31 31 32 34 Kentucky 16 15 16 19 18 25 27 28 28 Louisiana 18 16 17 18 21 23 24 27 29 Maine 16 16 17 20 24 30 33 36 38 Maryland 16 15 15 14 15 25 26 27 29 Massachusetts 24 24 23 24 25 39 40 42 44 Michigan 18 17 18 19 20 29 30 32 37 Minnesota 23 22 24 23 22 31 32 34 36 Mississippi 13 10 10 10 11 16 17 20 23 Missouri 13 13 14 14 15 18 18 20 22 Montana 12 14 16 18 19 21 22 23 24 Nebraska 27 28 29 30 31 34 35 38 39 Nevada 17 15 24 22 26 30 31 33 36 New Hampshire 24 23 23 23 25 42 45 49 51 New Jersey 17 18 17 17 18 34 36 38 41 New Mexico 8888914151719 New York 27 27 28 29 31 41 42 44 46 North Carolina 16 16 18 19 20 24 25 27 30 North Dakota 20 21 21 22 24 32 31 35 36 Northern Mariana Isl. 00000 0000 Ohio 15 16 18 20 23 25 26 29 31 Oklahoma 20 21 23 25 27 30 30 34 35 Oregon 16 17 18 18 18 31 32 34 36 Pennsylvania 20 19 20 20 21 30 30 32 34 Puerto Rico ****19225226 Rhode Island 43 46 47 48 50 52 53 54 54 South Carolina 15 14 16 17 19 23 24 26 30 South Dakota 33 30 30 31 32 36 36 44 45 Tennessee 18 15 16 17 18 25 25 28 31 Texas 16 17 16 17 18 22 22 23 24 Utah 24 21 22 20 21 26 32 34 36 Vermont 12 12 12 12 13 24 23 27 29 Virgin Islands * 0000 *0** Virginia 21 22 22 23 23 31 32 34 35 Washington 14 14 15 14 16 30 32 35 37 West Virginia 12 13 13 14 16 22 24 27 22 Wisconsin 19 20 21 23 24 26 26 27 27 Wyoming 14 15 17 18 19 21 21 22 24 Nationwide 17 % 17 % 18 % 18 % 19 % 27 % 28 % 30 % 32 % 2006 State Dec 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. 2009 Dec 2008 JunJun * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. NA = Not available. Some data for December 2008, June 2009, and December 2009 have been revised. Jun 2007 Table 11 Non-ILEC Share of Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State 1 2010 JunDecDec Jun U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 22 2010 Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Alabama 366 301 298 315 352 463 452 493 573 Alaska 116 * * * * **** American Samoa 0 0 0 0 0 0000 Arizona 970 1,018 1,043 1,071 1,129 1,227 1,169 1,188 1,242 Arkansas 163 166 178 173 175 220 224 224 242 California 2,900 3,046 2,898 2,984 3,101 4,607 4,753 4,845 5,136 Colorado 529 452 425 395 449 847 823 835 892 Connecticut 262 261 261 265 291 630 644 680 705 Delaware 102 100 99 85 85 166 165 165 173 District of Columbia 145 144 137 131 136 183 179 190 182 Florida 1,618 1,340 1,298 1,265 1,276 2,748 2,734 2,903 3,435 Georgia 909 655 730 725 764 1,174 1,132 1,169 1,322 Guam 0 0 0 * * **** Hawaii 61 74 88 103 115 114 117 125 128 Idaho 81 76 78 75 79 123 116 123 158 Illinois 1,139 1,075 950 909 875 1,667 1,610 1,630 1,661 Indiana 338 335 293 284 313 565 562 592 649 Iowa 230 238 251 269 273 309 310 322 344 Kansas 347 327 349 358 375 419 413 408 429 Kentucky 337 313 328 371 331 497 508 521 520 Louisiana 394 358 363 383 449 491 507 539 586 Maine 135 123 135 150 181 233 250 274 282 Maryland 591 552 527 475 479 868 889 909 943 Massachusetts 979 928 865 844 871 1,602 1,589 1,641 1,689 Michigan 993 883 923 893 927 1,458 1,449 1,499 1,738 Minnesota 676 641 659 613 572 877 862 904 925 Mississippi 161 125 125 112 122 184 184 214 253 Missouri 426 403 436 448 471 523 518 553 597 Montana 62 72 82 93 96 101 103 104 109 Nebraska 244 249 258 265 274 299 302 332 330 Nevada 246 219 356 307 372 420 410 415 449 New Hampshire 196 182 171 165 167 347 351 376 388 New Jersey 994 977 897 859 866 1,946 1,984 2,001 2,137 New Mexico 77 75 77 73 75 123 128 138 156 New York 3,043 2,942 2,868 2,941 3,125 4,563 4,574 4,705 4,783 North Carolina 798 768 846 888 953 1,101 1,137 1,199 1,324 North Dakota 68 70 71 71 76 113 104 123 126 Northern Mariana Isl. 0 0 0 0 0 0000 Ohio 963 962 1,069 1,171 1,365 1,473 1,448 1,587 1,657 Oklahoma 362 387 420 445 474 521 504 570 572 Oregon 306 318 325 308 300 575 562 581 614 Pennsylvania 1,572 1,437 1,521 1,407 1,423 2,205 2,157 2,197 2,321 Puerto Rico * * * * 186 210 234 170 244 Rhode Island 276 287 291 290 301 317 311 311 308 South Carolina 330 321 349 369 399 478 497 535 622 South Dakota 135 119 117 119 124 140 136 183 188 Tennessee 576 465 483 510 523 756 725 790 893 Texas 1,906 1,969 1,859 1,944 1,919 2,387 2,352 2,365 2,441 Utah 282 245 242 212 211 274 340 351 359 Vermont 49 48 47 47 47 90 91 102 109 Virgin Islands * 0 0 0 0 * # * * Virginia 1,047 1,032 1,048 1,034 1,043 1,443 1,475 1,563 1,577 Washington 506 479 480 428 471 1,031 1,023 1,092 1,157 West Virginia 117 119 121 132 141 196 214 235 176 Wisconsin 612 653 684 709 744 770 755 771 728 Wyoming 39 44 46 48 51 54 53 54 58 Total 29,896 28,626 28,729 28,725 30,049 44,267 44,273 45,945 48,782 # = Rounds to zero. * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Some data for December 2008, June 2009, and December 2009 have been revised. 2007 Table 12 Non-ILEC Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State 1 (In Thousands) 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. 2006 2008 State 2009 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 23 2010 Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Alabama 1,979 2,016 1,982 1,991 1,861 1,746 1,665 1,579 1,506 Alaska 325 321 318 301 294 289 282 273 271 American Samoa 11 11 11 10 11 10 10 10 10 Arizona 2,227 2,175 2,109 2,035 1,943 1,847 1,741 1,649 1,563 Arkansas 1,193 1,164 1,132 1,105 1,069 1,021 982 941 904 California 19,479 18,926 18,485 17,864 17,149 16,345 15,555 14,796 14,118 Colorado 2,276 2,207 2,133 2,057 1,973 1,873 1,758 1,656 1,569 Connecticut 1,928 1,849 1,785 1,681 1,632 1,540 1,463 1,389 1,326 Delaware 468 450 432 414 396 380 363 344 331 District of Columbia 892 855 832 797 788 737 714 697 680 Florida 9,013 8,975 8,708 8,356 7,932 7,440 6,918 6,491 6,138 Georgia 3,844 4,045 3,957 3,824 3,675 3,468 3,304 3,156 3,011 Guam 68 68 67 66 62 54 51 49 48 Hawaii 608 584 562 541 516 512 489 473 455 Idaho 666 664 651 628 609 582 550 514 486 Illinois 6,354 6,154 5,976 5,773 5,562 5,342 5,086 4,812 4,581 Indiana 3,080 2,971 2,875 2,766 2,665 2,547 2,434 2,300 2,186 Iowa 1,302 1,273 1,245 1,200 1,162 1,113 1,077 1,024 987 Kansas 1,100 1,074 1,046 1,012 977 939 899 858 820 Kentucky 1,732 1,725 1,684 1,616 1,542 1,458 1,387 1,352 1,317 Louisiana 1,800 1,825 1,801 1,759 1,710 1,634 1,561 1,489 1,426 Maine 692 669 649 611 579 542 519 482 463 Maryland 3,166 3,079 2,984 2,886 2,792 2,588 2,520 2,403 2,333 Massachusetts 3,076 2,927 2,830 2,712 2,609 2,493 2,369 2,238 2,149 Michigan 4,491 4,303 4,118 3,895 3,719 3,514 3,323 3,113 2,952 Minnesota 2,273 2,210 2,137 2,078 2,006 1,922 1,826 1,725 1,666 Mississippi 1,089 1,108 1,091 1,035 1,018 963 922 879 848 Missouri 2,842 2,778 2,722 2,650 2,568 2,465 2,367 2,259 2,162 Montana 460 445 435 416 406 387 371 351 342 Nebraska 661 644 628 624 606 584 564 543 521 Nevada 1,233 1,200 1,158 1,106 1,042 972 911 856 809 New Hampshire 624 598 575 546 507 470 435 385 366 New Jersey 4,784 4,543 4,354 4,137 3,936 3,734 3,519 3,288 3,112 New Mexico 877 860 834 816 783 754 713 682 651 New York 8,297 7,900 7,417 7,068 6,902 6,557 6,234 5,900 5,653 North Carolina 4,060 4,067 3,973 3,847 3,715 3,519 3,335 3,189 3,045 North Dakota 272 267 261 253 248 241 233 224 220 Northern Mariana Isl. 21 21 19 18 18 17 17 16 16 Ohio 5,368 5,168 4,973 4,763 4,537 4,326 4,124 3,914 3,719 Oklahoma 1,470 1,425 1,375 1,321 1,267 1,215 1,169 1,117 1,070 Oregon 1,627 1,562 1,502 1,429 1,359 1,286 1,210 1,140 1,080 Pennsylvania 6,385 6,175 5,953 5,775 5,494 5,243 5,029 4,771 4,571 Puerto Rico 1,035 994 916 809 786 755 698 610 706 Rhode Island 363 340 327 312 302 292 281 270 264 South Carolina 1,908 1,909 1,866 1,798 1,728 1,629 1,561 1,488 1,429 South Dakota 280 278 276 268 261 251 244 233 227 Tennessee 2,676 2,695 2,618 2,537 2,436 2,297 2,170 2,061 1,962 Texas 9,958 9,738 9,608 9,329 9,020 8,673 8,307 7,999 7,678 Utah 915 894 864 844 811 776 725 690 650 Vermont 370 362 355 340 323 289 299 280 265 Virgin Islands 69 68 67 64 62 61 59 57 59 Virginia 3,844 3,734 3,642 3,540 3,422 3,265 3,160 3,050 2,944 Washington 2,994 2,868 2,762 2,643 2,509 2,367 2,211 2,071 1,962 West Virginia 852 828 806 780 752 714 677 637 606 Wisconsin 2,670 2,605 2,516 2,422 2,336 2,246 2,156 2,051 1,970 Wyoming 245 238 233 225 218 209 200 190 183 Total 142,293 138,834 134,640 129,693 124,606 118,496 112,748 107,019 102,388 Some data for December 2009 have been revised. 2009 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. State 2006 2007 2008 Table 13 ILEC Total End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions by State 1 (In Thousands) U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 24 Table 14 Non-ILEC Methods of Providing Wireline Telephone Services by State as of June 30, 2010 State Resold LEC service ILEC UNEs CLEC-owned local loops VoIP Subscriptions 1 Total Alabama 110 122 92 248 573 Alaska * * * * * American Samoa 0 0 0 0 0 Arizona 171 119 539 414 1,242 Arkansas 24 29 67 121 242 California 1,079 531 687 2,840 5,136 Colorado 162 161 67 501 892 Connecticut 52 66 102 486 705 Delaware 35 32 2 104 173 District of Columbia 56 29 32 65 182 Florida 583 531 212 2,110 3,435 Georgia 196 309 130 687 1,322 Guam * * * * * Hawaii 25 3 17 83 128 Idaho 21 28 52 57 158 Illinois 247 291 108 1,015 1,661 Indiana 58 97 86 408 649 Iowa 58 44 89 153 344 Kansas 55 58 115 202 429 Kentucky 75 78 105 262 520 Louisiana 83 103 104 297 586 Maine 32 59 50 140 282 Maryland 305 129 43 467 943 Massachusetts 321 245 159 964 1,689 Michigan 80 339 52 1,267 1,738 Minnesota 118 266 133 409 925 Mississippi 69 43 37 104 253 Missouri 79 123 57 338 597 Montana 8 13 22 65 109 Nebraska 54 6 139 131 330 Nevada 82 41 24 303 449 New Hampshire 44 73 30 240 388 New Jersey 467 192 143 1,335 2,137 New Mexico 42 13 23 78 156 New York 791 598 462 2,931 4,783 North Carolina 176 201 126 821 1,324 North Dakota 5 17 64 40 126 Northern Mariana Isl. 0 0 0 0 0 Ohio 137 224 327 970 1,657 Oklahoma 90 57 141 284 572 Oregon 56 162 35 360 614 Pennsylvania 490 377 317 1,136 2,321 Puerto Rico 21 * * * 244 Rhode Island 33 26 162 87 308 South Carolina 122 125 67 309 622 South Dakota 5 2 126 56 188 Tennessee 178 142 103 470 893 Texas 383 511 245 1,301 2,441 Utah 61 85 35 177 359 Vermont 14 26 9 61 109 Virgin Islands 0 0 0 * * Virginia 504 188 323 561 1,577 Washington 126 195 71 764 1,157 West Virginia 24 21 4 126 176 Wisconsin 45 229 46 407 728 Wyoming 5 3 3 46 58 Total 8,061 7,443 6,345 26,933 48,782 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. (In Thousands) * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 25 State ILECs Non-ILECs Total Alabama 66% 57% 64% Alaska 50 * * American Samoa 50 NA 50 Arizona 60 60 60 Arkansas 64 50 61 California 56 55 56 Colorado 63 49 58 Connecticut 59 71 63 Delaware 59 61 60 District of Columbia 20 31 22 Florida 61 55 59 Georgia 59 53 58 Guam 52 * * Hawaii 55 63 57 Idaho 64 41 58 Illinois 54 60 56 Indiana 63 67 64 Iowa 67 61 65 Kansas 58 60 59 Kentucky 63 70 65 Louisiana 61 60 61 Maine 79 52 69 Maryland 56 54 55 Massachusetts 57 56 56 Michigan 56 77 64 Minnesota 69 48 61 Mississippi 61 53 59 Missouri 65 54 62 Montana 64 64 64 Nebraska 57 52 55 Nevada 58 59 58 New Hampshire 75 59 67 New Jersey 56 61 58 New Mexico 67 45 62 New York 57 61 59 North Carolina 62 60 62 North Dakota 68 63 66 Northern Mariana Isl. 56 NA 56 Ohio 63 67 64 Oklahoma 62 66 64 Oregon 67 55 63 Pennsylvania 67 50 61 Puerto Rico 77 42 68 Rhode Island 63 58 60 South Carolina 66 54 62 South Dakota 63 69 66 Tennessee 65 52 61 Texas 59 54 58 Utah 63 48 57 Vermont 77 58 71 Virgin Islands 61 * * Virginia 57 45 53 Washington 65 63 64 West Virginia 75 72 75 Wisconsin 60 63 61 Wyoming 52 76 58 Nationwide 60 58 59 * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. NA = Not applicable. Table 15 Percentage of End-User Switched Access Lines and VoIP Subscriptions Provided to Residential Customers by State as of June 30, 2010 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 26 State ILECs Non-ILECs Total 1 VoIP Providers 2 Alabama 21 114 128 74 Alaska 17 17 33 14 American Samoa 1 0 1 0 Arizona 16 105 117 82 Arkansas 20 73 90 52 California 15 162 174 122 Colorado 26 113 137 90 Connecticut 2 83 83 63 Delaware 1 69 70 50 District of Columbia 1 82 83 61 Florida 10 192 197 123 Georgia 27 155 174 106 Guam 1 4 5 3 Hawaii 2 36 38 32 Idaho 21 65 81 51 Illinois 44 156 190 105 Indiana 30 116 137 75 Iowa 135 102 212 49 Kansas 38 97 123 62 Kentucky 17 119 127 72 Louisiana 11 93 98 58 Maine 7 55 59 35 Maryland 2 110 110 80 Massachusetts 4 104 106 76 Michigan 27 112 129 75 Minnesota 51 107 142 67 Mississippi 13 92 99 61 Missouri 31 101 125 70 Montana 19 59 71 41 Nebraska 32 69 92 48 Nevada 13 78 89 61 New Hampshire 6 71 77 52 New Jersey 3 127 128 88 New Mexico 17 72 84 47 New York 25 150 165 104 North Carolina 18 138 148 95 North Dakota 23 48 65 26 Northern Mariana Isl 1 0 1 0 Ohio 34 131 155 92 Oklahoma 39 90 124 62 Oregon 25 101 121 74 Pennsylvania 22 135 149 94 Puerto Rico 1 14 14 13 Rhode Island 1 55 56 40 South Carolina 17 110 115 68 South Dakota 28 51 70 33 Tennessee 18 121 134 81 Texas 52 177 211 113 Utah 11 75 83 58 Vermont 7 47 54 36 Virgin Islands 1 1 2 1 Virginia 15 120 131 93 Washington 19 114 128 86 West Virginia 7 64 68 49 Wisconsin 41 109 135 68 Wyoming 11 57 63 42 Nationwide 766 777 1,335 429 2 The providers reporting interconnected VoIP subscribers in a state are a subset of the ILECs and non-ILECs in that state. Table 16 Number of Reporting ILECs, Non-ILECs, and VoIP Providers by State as of June 30, 2010 1 Holding companies or common-control entities that report both ILEC and non-ILEC operations in a state are counted once in the ILECs column and once in the Non-ILECs column and once is Total column for that state. Either type of operations might report interconnected VoIP subscribers. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 27 2010 Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Alabama 11 9 % 3,276 3,375 3,605 3,765 3,887 3,960 4,003 4,228 4,211 Alaska 11 6 397 412 432 460 480 383 544 586 590 American Samoa * * * * * * * * * * * Arizona 11 7 4,153 4,405 4,637 4,800 4,936 4,983 5,005 5,101 5,268 Arkansas 8 10 1,924 2,044 2,149 2,288 2,446 2,530 2,576 2,519 2,485 California 14 8 27,497 29,717 30,204 32,247 31,946 32,177 32,215 32,938 33,548 Colorado 12 9 3,428 3,608 3,756 3,968 4,066 4,311 4,357 4,503 4,647 Connecticut 7 8 2,582 2,705 2,787 2,884 2,959 3,030 3,047 3,123 3,192 Delaware 8 9 650 683 724 751 775 778 779 803 839 District of Columbia 8 8 879 880 966 936 1,047 1,096 1,116 1,183 1,227 Florida 11 11 14,177 14,762 15,255 15,605 15,809 16,158 16,425 16,744 16,895 Georgia 13 8 6,865 7,282 7,598 7,941 8,142 8,322 8,562 8,863 8,869 Guam * * * * * * * * * * * Hawaii 7 5 1,010 1,035 1,067 1,096 1,115 1,184 1,196 1,216 1,248 Idaho 15 8 901 973 1,019 1,086 1,125 1,167 1,180 1,221 1,269 Illinois 15 7 9,148 9,589 9,949 10,330 10,634 10,919 11,070 11,523 11,604 Indiana 12 9 3,973 4,271 4,448 4,675 4,824 4,956 4,983 5,205 5,289 Iowa 71 8 1,867 2,010 2,058 2,166 2,245 2,319 2,336 2,432 2,466 Kansas 15 11 1,905 2,047 2,133 2,261 2,326 2,421 2,430 2,466 2,491 Kentucky 12 10 2,821 2,966 3,101 3,291 3,343 3,445 3,439 3,631 3,654 Louisiana 10 7 3,356 3,492 3,612 3,765 3,896 4,012 4,053 3,993 3,953 Maine 8 15 787 845 882 941 972 1,012 1,006 1,065 1,040 Maryland 10 7 4,471 4,691 4,818 5,024 5,124 5,234 5,260 5,323 5,500 Massachusetts 8 11 4,917 5,129 5,289 5,470 5,624 5,749 6,027 6,171 6,367 Michigan 12 13 6,863 7,094 7,333 7,608 7,821 8,027 8,171 8,576 8,690 Minnesota 10 9 3,543 3,702 3,834 4,048 4,164 4,345 4,254 4,439 4,611 Mississippi 10 6 1,923 2,030 2,070 2,196 2,252 2,312 2,361 2,345 2,322 Missouri 12 8 4,068 4,322 4,480 4,674 4,835 4,940 4,985 5,129 5,141 Montana 10 4 575 620 650 694 723 748 707 802 783 Nebraska 11 11 1,199 1,272 1,325 1,387 1,451 1,496 1,508 1,515 1,566 Nevada 12 9 1,883 1,990 2,093 2,167 2,249 2,268 2,325 2,393 2,417 New Hampshire 8 11 897 943 973 1,022 1,045 1,080 1,075 1,125 1,141 New Jersey 8 8 6,954 7,207 7,419 7,654 7,834 8,008 8,036 8,158 8,373 New Mexico 10 6 1,253 1,333 1,416 1,489 1,555 1,536 1,550 1,624 1,668 New York 11 10 14,574 15,262 15,901 16,395 17,260 16,702 18,193 18,882 19,502 North Carolina 12 10 6,209 6,627 6,962 7,306 7,428 8,024 8,193 8,108 8,259 North Dakota 11 4 457 473 492 513 541 581 562 618 590 Northern Mariana Isl. * * * * * * * * * * * Ohio 13 11 7,939 8,380 8,723 9,099 9,357 9,565 9,456 10,059 10,236 Oklahoma 17 6 2,317 2,480 2,572 2,723 2,808 2,889 2,988 3,077 3,109 Oregon 11 8 2,484 2,656 2,781 2,923 3,007 3,084 3,112 3,235 3,297 Pennsylvania 14 11 8,349 8,831 9,201 9,615 9,895 10,214 10,455 10,867 11,141 Puerto Rico 6 3 2,171 2,301 2,323 2,411 2,502 2,624 2,706 2,807 2,879 Rhode Island 6 8 765 798 829 848 874 888 880 893 906 South Carolina 14 10 3,001 3,209 3,340 3,500 3,573 3,323 3,374 3,896 3,848 South Dakota 10 4 514 548 570 596 611 631 613 681 681 Tennessee 12 10 4,731 5,127 4,971 5,246 5,791 5,518 5,676 5,914 6,041 Texas 24 6 16,928 17,822 18,792 19,677 20,390 21,008 21,403 21,849 22,201 Utah 13 6 1,649 1,775 1,874 1,971 2,046 2,095 2,109 2,166 2,220 Vermont 6 7 334 358 375 402 421 435 398 463 431 Virgin Islands * * * * * * * * * * * Virginia 11 9 5,325 5,607 6,148 6,416 6,242 6,856 6,596 7,250 7,440 Washington 11 8 4,495 4,799 5,035 5,292 5,461 5,624 5,671 5,816 5,965 West Virginia 12 15 965 1,040 1,095 1,173 1,236 1,295 1,315 1,401 1,406 Wisconsin 13 11 3,517 3,510 3,641 3,842 3,966 4,265 4,317 4,546 4,599 Wyoming 13 5 359 387 410 441 457 484 429 517 501 Nationwide 176 9 % 217,418 229,619 238,316 249,332 255,729 261,284 265,332 274,283 278,918 Table 17 Mobile Telephone Facilities-based Carriers and Mobile Telephony Subscribers Subscribers (In Thousands) * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Some data for December 2009 have been revised. State 2006 2007 2008 1 Percentage of mobile telephony subscribers purchasing their service subscriptions from a mobile wireless reseller. Jun 2010 Carriers % Resold 1 2009 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 28 Zero 17.7 % 17.7 % 17.7 % 19.4 % 18.3 % 7.7 % 8.7 % 9.3 % 7.1 % One 11.3 11.1 11.1 11.7 11.6 9.2 10.1 10.1 8.7 Two 7.8 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.6 7.8 7.9 7.6 7.4 Three 6.2 6.7 6.7 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.1 6.2 6.2 Four 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 5.2 5.2 Five 4.2 4.4 4.4 3.9 4.1 4.8 4.6 4.5 4.7 Six 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.5 4.2 4.0 3.8 4.2 Seven 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.6 3.4 3.5 3.6 Eight 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.4 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 Ten or More 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 44.0 44.0 46.6 Zero 2.3 % 2.4 % 2.4 % 2.8 % 2.6 % 0.4 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 0.4 % One 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 1.2 1.2 0.9 Two 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.0 Three 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 Four 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.3 Five 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.4 Six 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.3 Seven 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.4 Eight 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.8 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.6 Nine 2.7 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.7 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 Ten or More 77.4 76.1 75.8 75.0 75.9 86.6 86.2 86.1 87.9 1 See footnote 1, Table 1. 2010 Jun Demographic data were created by geographically merging contemporaneous Tele Atlas ® Dynamap ® ZIP Code Boundary & Inventory Files with census block-level population data from the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Figures may not add to 100% due to rounding. 2 A holding company or common-control entity that reports both CLEC end-user switched access lines and interconnected VoIP subscribers in a state reports a single list of ZIP Codes in which it has any such customers and is counted once in each listed ZIP Code. JunDec Jun 2007 Dec Dec Jun Table 18 Percentage of ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers 1 2010 Jun 2008 Jun Dec Number of Providers 2 2009 Dec 2006 JunJun 2009 20072006 DecJun Dec 2008 Table 19 Percentage of Households in ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers 1 Number of Providers 2 Jun Dec U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 29 Alabama 4 % 14 % 4 % 5 % 3 % 4 % 4 % 1 % 60 % Alaska 57 26 3 3 3 4 2 1 0 Arizona 6 13 6 2 4 3 3 4 60 Arkansas 15 42 6 6 4 3 3 2 18 California 2 10 4 3 4 3 3 3 69 Colorado 10 24 5 3 3 2 2 3 48 Connecticut 0546776 559 Delaware 0232225 580 District of Columbia 0 12 00000 0 Florida 1322212 385 Georgia 2 18 54433 37 Hawaii 2 22 87397 339 Idaho 10 41 67472 12 Illinois 6 26 96543 238 Indiana 3 15 79784 54 Iowa 25 46 63312 112 Kansas 16 37 64435 2 Kentucky 5 26 66545 438 Louisiana 3 18 43444 35 Maine 5 22 59766 732 Maryland 0333444 376 Massachusetts 0232133 185 Michigan 1 13 46655 56 Minnesota 11 38 64332 231 Mississippi 1754445 46 Missouri 16 37 54433 22 Montana 40 35 52122 113 Nebraska 29 47 42221 2 Nevada 7 19 37333 352 New Hampshire 1257666 98 New Jersey 0001111 194 New Mexico 16 33 87525 023 New York 1 12 54434 365 North Carolina 1 11 56753 49 North Dakota 27 61 32201 15 Ohio 0866777 45 Oklahoma 12 33 54423 236 Oregon 5 26 68365 38 Pennsylvania 2 20 64544 352 Puerto Rico 0 11 6 9 7 10 17 18 22 Rhode Island 0754738 463 South Carolina 2 15 55333 41 South Dakota 27 56 33131 15 Tennessee 4 17 43424 458 Texas 5 19 54432 26 Utah 7 33 52243 342 Vermont 1 30 11 6 12 7 6 6 20 Virginia 2 29 96644 337 Washington 4 23 65333 250 West Virginia 8 31 10 13 8 6 4 3 16 Wisconsin 9 39 77333 227 Wyoming 11 57 54320 116 Nationwide 7 % 22 % 5 % 5 % 4 % 4 % 3 % 3 % 47 % EightZero One - Three Four Table 20 Number of Providers Nine Ten or More Six Seven State as of June 30, 2010 Percentage of ZIP Codes with CLECs or Non-ILEC VoIP Providers by State Five U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 30 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 31 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 32 Technical Notes General Detailed information about FCC Form 477 reporting requirements is available at http://www.fcc.gov/form477/. See Glossary for definitions of terms used in this report. Counting lines and subscribers • Form 477 counts both switched access lines and interconnected VoIP subscriptions as the maximum number of calls that may be active, simultaneously, from the end user’s location under the purchased service plan. All VoIP subscriptions discussed in this report are interconnected VoIP subscriptions. • Form 477 data may not count all VoIP phone connections to Internet Protocol Private Branch Exchange (IP PBX) equipment that is owned by business end users because of the variety of ways the IP PBX may connect to the public switched telephone network. Holding company-subsidiary relationships • When counting service providers who have any retail customers in a particular geography (for example, a state or a ZIP Code), we count a holding company or common-control entity no more than once in any specified sub-category of total providers. • Nationwide counts of providers are unique counts for any specified sub-category of total providers (for example, all non-ILECs or all interconnected VoIP providers); an entity operating in multiple states is counted only once. ILEC-CLEC affiliations • Lines from CLECs who have ILEC affiliates are handled at the state level in one of several ways. We place the lines into the non-ILEC category if the affiliate is an ILEC other than AT&T or Verizon. Lines from CLEC affiliates of AT&T and Verizon are allocated between the ILEC and non-ILEC categories based on staff estimates if the CLEC operates in the AT&T or Verizon ILEC service area in the state, respectively. ZIP Code-based information • Wireline service providers report whether they have at least one residential or business customer in each ZIP Code, using either switched access or interconnected VoIP. This contrasts with the census tract-based broadband reporting requirements the Commission adopted in 2008. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 33 • The report includes summary statistics of the presence of competitors to the ILEC, or ILECs, in individual ZIP Codes. These entities are CLECs or interconnected VoIP providers who are not affiliated with the ILEC, or ILECs, who serve end users in that ZIP Code. However, because providers may not offer service across an entire ZIP Code and because different providers may target different customer segments in areas where they provide service, we cannot conclude that the number of providers identified as delivering wireline service within a ZIP Code represents the number of options available to any specific customer within that ZIP Code. We further note that these data on the number of providers in a ZIP Code do not indicate whether a particular provider is offering service solely over its own last-mile facilities or is using the facilities of another carrier or entity. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 34 Glossary Term Definition Broadband bundle The purchase, from the same or affiliated retailers, of interconnected VoIP service and broadband Internet access service, either for a single price or for separate prices. Cable modem service A service which offers customers access to the Internet over a cable system at broadband speeds. Circuit switching A method of completing electronic communications in which a transmission path is established for dedicated use by a communication; the basis of the public switched telephone network (PSTN). CLEC Competitive Local Exchange Carrier: A new LEC that operates within the service area of an ILEC. DSL Digital Subscriber Line: A digital local loop, typically using copper facilities, that frequently is used to offer customers access to the Internet at broadband speeds. End users Residential, business, institutional, or government entities that use services for their own purposes and who do not resell such services to other entities. Fixed wireless service A radio communication service between specified fixed points. FTTP or FTTH Fiber to the Premises (Home): A network access architecture in which optical fiber is deployed all the way to the customer’s premises (home). Internet access service Service that provides end users access to the Internet. ILEC Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier: A company or cooperative that was providing telephone service in a localized area, typically on a monopoly basis, prior to enactment of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Internet protocol or IP A language and set of formal rules that govern how packets transit the Internet. Interconnected VoIP or iVoIP A service that enables real-time, two-way voice communications; requires a broadband connection from the user’s location; requires Internet- protocol compatible customer premises equipment; and permits users generally to receive calls that originate on the public switched telephone network and to terminate calls to the public switched telephone network. LEC Local Exchange Carrier: A company that provides telephone service within a localized area and access services that connect its customers to long-distance (Interexchange Carrier) networks. Local loop The physical connection between the customer’s premises and the telephone company’s local switching office, typically provided using copper, fiber, or a combination of copper and fiber facilities. Mobile wireless service A radio communication service between mobile and fixed stations, or between mobile stations. Nomadic interconnected VoIP A service whose terms allow use over any broadband connection available to the subscriber (such as at a hotel or vacation residence); by contrast, a non-nomadic service subscription must be used over a single predetermined broadband connection. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 35 Non-ILEC Any provider of communications services who does not have ILEC regulatory status. Other ILEC An ILEC who is not an RBOC. Other wireline All copper-wire based transmission technologies other than DSL technologies; Ethernet over copper and T-1 are examples. OTT Over-the-top: Interconnected VoIP service provided by entities that neither own nor operate telecommunications facilities. Packet switching A method of completing electronic communications in which the information is disassembled into discrete packets that are transmitted independently and later reassembled; IP is an example. PBX Private Branch Exchange: A telephone switch that is owned or leased by the telephone company’s customer and generally located on the customer’s premises. RBOC Regional Bell Operating Company: The ILEC operations of AT&T, Qwest, and Verizon. Retail local telephone service Retail switched access lines and interconnected VoIP subscriptions. Retail switched access lines Switched access lines for which an end user is the customer. Standalone interconnected VoIP The purchase of interconnected VoIP service without the purchase of broadband Internet access service from the same retailer, or from an affiliated retailer. Special access circuit A dedicated, non-switched circuit (connection or line) provided by an ILEC, commonly used to connect an end user to another communications service provider; also frequently used by wireless service providers to connect cell towers to mobile switching centers (MSCs). Switched access line A service connection between an end user and the local telephone company’s switch; the basis of plain old telephone service (POTS). Total ILEC lines The sum of ILEC-reported retail switched access lines, interconnected VoIP subscriptions, wholesale switched access lines, and UNEs provided to CLECs. UNE Unbundled Network Element: A physical or functional element of an ILEC network that must be provided to a CLEC at a cost-based price, as provide for in the Telecommunications Act of 1996. UNE-L UNE-Loop: An ILEC unbundled local loop provided to a CLEC at a cost-base price. UNE-P UNE-Platform: The combination of ILEC unbundled local loop, switching, and transport, provided to a CLEC at cost-based prices. Wholesale switched access lines Local telephone service provided to an unaffiliated telephone company, which resells the service to end users; typically provided by an ILEC to a CLEC. ZIP Code A five-digit geographical ZIP Code. Customer Response Publication: Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2010 You can help us provide the best possible information to the public by completing this form and returning it to the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of the FCC's Wireline Competition Bureau. 1. Please check the category that best describes you: ____ press ____ current telecommunications carrier ____ potential telecommunications carrier ____ business customer evaluating vendors/service options ____ consultant, law firm, lobbyist ____ other business customer ____ academic/student ____ residential customer ____ FCC employee ____ other federal government employee ____ state or local government employee ____ Other (please specify) 2. Please rate the report: Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor No opinion Data accuracy (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Data presentation (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Timeliness of data (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Completeness of data (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Text clarity (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Completeness of text (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) 3. Overall, how do you Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor No opinion rate this report? (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) 4. How can this report be improved? 5. May we contact you to discuss possible improvements? Name: Telephone #: To discuss the information in this report, contact: 202-418-0940 or for users of TTY equipment, call 202-418-0484 Fax this response to or Mail this response to 202-418-0520 FCC/WCB/IATD, Mail Stop 1600 F Washington, DC 20554