FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 24th Annual Report For Fiscal Year 1958 With report summary and notations of later important developments UNITEO STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE - WASHINGTON For sale by the Superintendent of boevmenll, U.S. Government Printing Office W.lIbinsiOD 25, D. C. • Pl'iee SO _at. (paper) COMMISSIONERS Members of the Federal Communications Commission (As of June 30,1958) JOHN C. DOERFER, Chairman ("(l'nll (.'.\:pir('!f .ltrt!1! 30, HlGl) ROSEL H. HYDE (Term expires June 30, 1959) ROBERT T. BARTLEY (Term expires June 30, 1965) ROBERT E. LEE (Term. expires June 30, 11:160) T. A. M. CRAVEN (Term expires June 3Q, Ul(3) FREDERICK W. FORD (Term expires June 30, 1964) JOHN S. CROSS (Term expires June 30, 1962) A liet of present and past Commissioners appears in the appendix to this report. n LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Wtl8Mnrlton 25, D. O. To the Oongress of the United States: The Federal Communications Commission herewith transmits its 24th annual report for the fiscal year 1958. Subsequent important developments are noted for more current reference. The report contains information and data specified by the Congress in section 4 (k) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Further required biographies of employees joining the Commission during the fiscal year, also a list of those leaving during that period, are being reported in a nonprinted supplement. Respectfully, JOHN C. DOERFER, Ohairman III [ Page IV in the original document is intentionally blank ] Table of Contents REPORT SUMMARy..........................•...................... General. . . . .. . . . . . Common carrier . Telephone , ' . Telegraph....................•............................... International. ........................................•...••... Safety and special . Broadcast _ . TV........................................................•. FM......................................................•... AM . Tall towers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . Field engineering and monitoring. . . . . Rerearch and laboratory , . Frequency allocation . National defense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commission . GENERAL. . Organization chart , " . Commission . Commissioners. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . Staff organization... .. . . . . .. . . . . Personnel . Appropriations and expenditures . Dockets , . Litigation . Important cases~. Comparative TV decisiomtl standards . Allocation rnlemaking cases , . Standing to protest under section 309 (c) . Power of the Commission to subpena records . Economic {actors in broadcast grants . Suspension of operators'liceo8e8 . Effect of change in TV alloeations . I.egislation ' . Commission proposals . Authorizations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Applications . Correspondence . Releases and publications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign technical assistance . General problems . v Page 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 9 8 9 10 11 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 17 17 18 18 18 19 VI TABLE OF CONTENTS Page NATIONAL DEFENSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 War emergency powers of President. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Conelrad in war and peace , . . . 21 National defense purpose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Peacetime use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Othec defense activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 National defense executive reserve unit... _........................... 23 ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNiCATION............................ 25 Today....................................................... 25 Tomorrow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 FREQUENCY ALLOCATION AND USE............................... 29 General. . . 29 National frequency allocations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 International frequency allocation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 International frequency usage data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 International frequency assignment coordination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 International conferences and meetings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 International interference and infractions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 National frequency records. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 International frequency records and registration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 National frequeney assignment coordination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 COMMON CARRIER SERVICES. . . .. .... .. . . . . . . .. . .. . ... .. . . . . . .. . ... 38 Domestic telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 General. . . ... . ... . ... ... . . .. ... . . . . . . . ... ... . .. .. .. .... 38 Services and faeilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Construction of interstate facilities..... . .. . . .. . . . 38 Discontinuance of service. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Speed of serviee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Acquisitions and consolidatioD.8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Interlocking directorates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Common carrier microwave radio frequency problems. . . . . . . . • . 40 Microwave facilities for closed circuit TV. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Domestic public land mobile radio service. . . •. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Rural radiotelephone service. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Public radiotelephone service to vessels.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Developmental domestic public aeronautical service... .. . 43 Rates and tariffs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Private line service rates..... . . . . 44 Bell System lease-maintenance service. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Off-the-air pickup TV transmission channels. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Tariff filings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Other regulatory matlers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Depreciation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . 45 Separation procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Western Electric earnings and prices. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Pensions and relief. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Original cost accounting. . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Continuing property records. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Field studies and reviews. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Uniform systems of accounts... ..... ... ... . ... .... . ... . ..•.. 47 Preservation of records. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 TABLE OF CONTENTS VII COMMON CARRIER SERVIt matters , , . . . . . 119 Network study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Il9 Violations of chain broadcasting rules. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 Broadcast station sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 Rules and policies concerning programing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 Revision of programing portion of application form. . . . . . . . . . 122 Political broadcasts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 Advert~ingon broadcast stations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 "Stereophonic" broadcasting.. , , . .. . . . . .. . . . 124 "Subliminal perception" _ : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 125 Remote control operation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 Hearing procedure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 Proposed curb on "payoffs" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 "Cutoff" date change. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 Problems. . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 Statistics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Cunent broadcast authorizations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Status of broadcast autborizations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 Broadcast authorizations by States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 Broadcast authorizations by cities. . .... .. .. ... . ..... . . . ... .... .. 130 Broadcasting since 1949. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 Broadcast applications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 Broadcast industry financial data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 CLOSED.ClRCUIT TELEVISION. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. . 136 Wired TV booms , , . . . . . . 136 Medical. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 Education , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 BUBiness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 Industry , , . . . . . . 137 Transporta"bion , .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . 137 Municipal , . . . . . . 137 Political. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 Entertainment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 How CC-TV work,. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . 138 FIELD ENGINEERING AND MONITORING , 140 General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 Field facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 Field offices. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 Monitoring st.at.ions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 Mobile installations ' , , , 141 TABLE OF CONTENTS XI FIELD ENGINEERING AND MONITORING-Conlinued p ••_ Functions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 Inspections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 Sbip. . 141 Broadcast. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 Other radio services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 Enforcement actions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 Operator examination aDd licensing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 Commercial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 Amateur operator examinations. .. 144- Interim ship station licenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 Citizens station licenselil '.' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 Investigations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 Interference to radio reception. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 Unlicensed operation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 Monitoring and direction finding................................ 147 Interference complaints. . . . 147 Surveys.................................................. 148 Search and rescue activities '" . . . . 148 Assistance to Department of Defense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 Monitoring training program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 Engineering surveys and measurements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 Improvements in field technical facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 Industry self-help coordination : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 Television interference committees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 Cooperative interference committees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 Induction and Dielectric Heating Subcommittee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 Electronic Industries Association. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 National Electrical Manufacturers Association. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 Society of the Plastics Industry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 Statistics '" '" . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . 153 Investigative statistics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 Monitoring statistics " , . . .. . . .. 153 Monitoring interference complaints , , .. , . 154 Field inspection activity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 Commercial radio operator licenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 ANTENNAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 !.'robl""". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 Antenna marking and lighting.•............................... , . . . . 157 Antenna application processing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 Statistics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 Tall TV towers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 Directional antennas '" . . .. . . . .. . 160 RADIO STATION CALLS............................................ 162 Their purpose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 Their assignment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 Broadcast calls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 Amateur calls , . . 1M Experimental calls ,. . 164 Other calls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 Geographic pattern. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . 165 Distress calls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 XII TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa.. RESEARCH AND LABORATORy................................... 167 Technical research ,. 167 General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 VHF and UHF propagation research. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 AM broadcast propagation research. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 Government-industry cooperation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 Equipment type acceptance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 Technical standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 Sy~tem8'Otudicl'>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 Single sideband. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 Experimental radio services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 Industrial, scientific, and medical devices. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 Incidental and restricted radiation devices , ,. . . 174 Laboratory , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 Type approval of equipment. . . . . . . . . . . .. 175 Radio propagation measurements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 Development and calibration of field equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 Study of new systems and devices , . . . . . 176 Standards activities , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 APPENDiX...................... . . . . . 177 Field offices•••••••••• , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 Publications. • • •• • •••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 Past and present Commissioners. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 Report Summary GENERAL Increasing leadership by the United States in all fields of electrical communication is reflected by the unabated upswing in licensing and other regulatory activities of the Federal Communications Commis sion. In no other country are radio and wire facilities utilized for public service, private business, and personal convenience to the extent achieved in the United States. At the same time, it is reassuring to know that our extensive communication systems form an integral part of the national defense program. The Commission closed its 24th year with more than 2.1 million radio authorizations on its books. This is the largest figure in the Nation's history. Of these, 1.5 million were commercial radio operator permits of different grades required to man this country's spreading forest of transmitters. Authorizations for radio stations of all kinds exceeded 450,000. For the first time, broadcast station authorizations rose above 9,000. But ther~are nearly 50 times that many stations in the nonbroadcast servICes. However, the number of radio stations is not a true indication of the number of related transmitters. One authorization in a non broadcast service does not usually mean a single transmitter. For example, an authorization for a police radio system covers many mobile transmitters. A grant for forestry conservation permits the use of numerous portable transmitters. In consequence, radio station authorizations collectively represent nearly 1.5 million transmitters. The increasing demand for communication facilities is evinced in the fact that during the year the Commission received more applica tions than ever before. Rapid changes in electronic techniques and utilization add greatly to the Commission's task of accommodating new services, administering to expanding services, adjudicating high ly competitive proceedings, obtaining more economical USe of radio frequencies in great demand but short supply, and dealing with mounting interference and other "growing pains." Though broadcasting matters--particularly those relating to tele 1 2 REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION vision-O 27,196,393 2.53 1,719,825 1,931,272 12.2fJ 39,102,062 41,103,043 5.88 31,039,618 33,378,493 7.54 8,OO2,H4 8,024,550 (.47) 4,307, HOO 3,770,905 (12.46) 4,057,682 5,435,284 33.95 600,000 000,000 50.00 .~O,III 57,533 14.81 12,951,547 13,672,370 5.57 1,105,356 1,156,680 4.64 5,241 5,401 3.05 $24,8IfJ,044 $24,118.840 (.) Soo notes after "Ocean cable carriers". Ocean cable carriers (including Western Union cable operations) Percent of 1956 1957 increase or (decrease) 3 3 $9.,367,968 $96, 32., 440 2.07 58,026,629 58,780,796 1.30 36,341,339 37,543,6« 3.31 201,871 194, .40 (3.68) 23,330,466 23,203.406 (.55) 34,370,387 35,442,243 3.12 29,822,091 32,880,261 10.25 4,548,290 2,561,976 (43.67) 1,475,000 1,615,000 9.49 2,128,260 485,506 (77.19) 883,670 883,670 IM,lM DO,l08 (8.69) 10,824,602 10,.(71,116 (3.Zl) 6,065 6,101 .69 $16,469,250 $17,875,091 '.54 Item Number or revenue messl'ges bandIed: Dome tie •~_~.~_.~_ Tr1nlIce 'nic~. . , _ Number or employees at end of Ootober ,~_~. Total compensation lor the year~_ Number ofcarrfers...~------~--~----------.-------•• --1~==oo=c'='~+~'=''='~;,F;;,;;;;,;;;;;;; Book cost of plant (as of Deo. 31) _ Depreciation ani amortizationreserves_~._ Net book cost of planL. _ Mess"ge revenues: DomesticI_~~~._._ TransoC6mlc._. •__~~_ Total operating revenues _ Opemting expenses, depreciation and other operating reve- nue de .uotlons ..~• _ Net operating revenuos~ Provisbn for Federal incometaxes.~. _ Net Income • , __ • __ • _ Dividen Is declared 2 •• ___ • _ I Includes revenues of 2 ocelUl cable carriers and the radiotelegraph carriers from the domestlc trans_ mlsglon of transoceanic and IIlllrine messages outside of points of entry or departure in the United States, and revenues from domestic-classificationme~sages(primarily Canadian and Mexican). 2 All dIvidends declared by Western Union Teiegraph Co. have beeD reported In the table above relating to the domestic land line operations of that compll.llY and are excluded from this table. I Represents domestlc-classlfication IDP_',sages (primarily Canadian and Mexican). 'Not comp3rl\ble because 1956 figure includes 8 months' compensation of about 700 employees transferred Aug. 31, 1956, to a nonreporting entity upon the merger of 2reporting carriers. International Telegraph and Telephone Traffic During calendar 1957 a total of 607,538,000 words were handled into and out of the United States by international cable and radio telegraph carriers. In the outbound direction, 311,650,000 words were transmitted, while 295,888,000 were inbound. There were also REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMuNICATIONS COMMISSION 67 during calendar 1957 1,092,000 telephone calls outbound from the Uuited States and 1,054,000 calls inbound, excluding calls handled directly from United States possessions to overseas points. The word volume of international telegraph traffic and the number of telephone calls between the United States and each of the principal countries of the world during calendar 1957 are set forth in the fol lowing table. United States-International telegraph (radio and cable) traffic in words, and tele phone calls (radio ana cable), 1957 (includes traffic transiting the United States) Telegraph traffic-- number of words (in thousands) Telephone traffic 1_ Dumber of calls (in thousands) Country Outbound from the United States Inbound to the United States Outbound from the United Stutes Inbound to the United States ----------3---------~--2 18 11 2 4 1 2 (2) 1 no 121 ----------,- ----_··----9 7 5 2Q 2Q ---~~----i.r----------ii 4 3 ·-~~·-----i--~-~4--~---3 2 1 ----~---+-i-----------'3 7 4 ---~----+-9-----~----.47 ----------6----~------~~ 1 2 ----------i---~--(!y~--~ .. 3. -4----~--9i---~--~-~~-66 3 3 Europe, Africa, and tJu Near East Ascension Island (Ba.hram telephone rciay) _ Albania__ _ 73 105 AIgeria_________________________________________________ lPS 187 Arabla__~._.__~__~., , __ .__________ 1, 114 1, 107 Austria.__ ..~,~•~~____1,812 1,106 Belgian Congo~._.~~_________361 264 Belgium __ .~• •~~___4,862 3,894 Brjtl~hEast Afrjca~_,•~__~______400 406 British Wp-st Afrlca~~_~_______681 603 Cyprus_ ..~~____129 141 Czcchoslovakla~•~~~____634 800 ~nmark~__ .~_+__~~__1,985 1,200 Egypt_ .~~~_________2,868 3,780 Ethiopla_ ,~__~~~, •• 262 220 Flnland •.~__~~_546 536 France~~•.~__.~._~____15, 711 15,350 French West Afrlca~__ 4 • •~____161 184 Germany~__ ._. •.~.___ 16,987 13,900 Greece_ • __ •~• .______ 2,241 1,728 Hungary.~•~~_______419 636 IceJand __ ,~~.~• ,~____252 265 Iran ••• •~, 4_____ 1,201 1,027 IrnQ • 4~• .___________ 876 936 Ireland_.__~.~.•~____973 943 IsraeL~~~_.~~~+_ 2,829 2,481 Italy._~__ •~~__~..4. __.4 __~____12, 9&5 9,467 Lebanon~•~_4~____1,291 1,578 Liberla__~• •__._~~•~_715 808 Libya • 4 4 .+ __~._. ._ 265 175 Lu;Qmbourg~~• 4____ 127 101 MadagasC8r~• ._______________ 144 122 Morocco--French ,__________ 539 514 Morocoo---Tangler •~~.______________281 379 Nethcrlands • • ._____________________ 7,661 6,345 N-orway +~__._.__ 4____________ 3,060 2,034 P~lanOuJl •~4______________523 562 P-otand~~~~~.______ 1,198 1,275 PortugaL~4,_~__~~____________1,299 988 Rbodesfa~.~~~•• + 199 213 Roumanls 4~~4..~__________390 296 ~~deri~~======~=~=~::~::=:::::::::::::=::::==::::::::=::t~i:~~ SwItzerland~~4~__8,679 5,340 Syrfa 4 +~___200 2D9 Transjordania._---- _. + ••__~._________340l 625 Trieste, Free Territory oL 4 + .____________ 132 106 Tunisia • •__~_.________ ISO 132 Tutkey_,~_______________1, 549 1,764 Union of South Alrlca 4______ 2,731 2,801 U, s. s. R~, •~~_____4, 140 3,966 United Kingdom__ • .~~_____51,501 51,7'.l,~ Yugoslavia.~• 4__ .44 . ..~____1,078 {lID All otherpl~s•~~._____ 918 1,6V3 I-:=:-:-I-----,-,:-c:-:-I--:-:--I--- 68 REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION United States-International telegraph (radio and cable) traffic in words, and telephone calls (radio and cable). 1957 (includes ttaffic transiting the United States)-Continued Telegraph traffic- number of words (In thousands) Telephone traffic 1_ number of calls (In thousands) Country Outbonnd from the United Stutes Inbound to the United States Outbound from the United States Inbound to the United States 16 18 • • 3 3 , 5 12 1l 12 13 I 1 38 24 1 I 24 1l 5 5 12 22 4 , 229 284 1 2 9 10 2 1 • , -<---------- ----------- 13 I' 5 ·----------6 72 75 , , (') (') 2 3 2 2 18 21 --------- ------------ 499 561 .= West Indtt8, Central, North, and South America Argentlna..~.___ 7,121 8,270 Aruba____________________ _._~_ Bnhamas~__i 525 1,490 Barbados~_______________'318 239 Bermudu.______________________________________________ I,llI'> 1,172 BolivilL • __~~____949 680 Brar,iL_______________________________ 10, 624 10,013 British Guianu_________________________________________ 258 256 British HQnduras~___________17::1 lfi2 g:~:r~one-_-~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:=~-~~~~~~~=__3 10,~~~3 13,~~ ChUe~~____________~_3,31:\7 2,277 Colombia~_ 4,812 4,512 Costa Ricll______________ 1,035 757 CUb!L~______________ 7, 607 10, 680 Cllracao~__•.~•• " Dominican RCpllblic___________________________________ 1,767 1,549 Ecuador~______________1, 685 1,012 French West Indies +~._ 101 59 Guatemala__ 1, '«Is. 1,915 HaitL___ 980 1,022 Honduras RcpubUc____________________________________ 873 854 Jamalca__~______1,429 1, 176 ~:t~~iaiidiiWest-iii(fles~~~===~~=~~~~~~~~~~====~~~~~=~~~i:~~~~~;m Nicaragua ._ 1,040 721 Other British West Indws ._________________________ 278 IRS Panama •• __ 1, &ra 1,175 Paraguay_____ 314 234 Peru_ 2, 746 2,349 PUClto Rlco______________________ 5,774 5,073 Salvador__ __ _ 1, 103 0'21} Surlnam.~___194 121 Trlnidad_______________________________________________ 1,075 869 Uruguay •~~______2,084 1,!lOl Venezuela~________________________12,731 16,651 Virgin Islands • .____________________ 382 34fl All other places~.___________ 161 1 1_00_1, 1~__ TotaL.~._____________ 91,496 94,688 Atia and Oceania 859 82 ------------ -----------7 4,377 3,393 5 716 207 ----------- ----------- '" '2\) ---{~)----------(2)----- 129 51 1,556 1,340 2 3 434 549 6 6 5,733 4,837 135 106 2,174 1,9fifi 3 5 5,082 4,427 ------ ----- 788 962 -----(2)"- -~-------- 1, 945 3,Iifi1 1 15,997 13,4,~359 27 1,386 1,966 , 7 1,621 1,146 (') 1 234 23 -----------i 1,360 1,126 1 534 fI07 11 3 1, M'J 1,857 -·--i3 4,644 5,252 115 93 ------ ----~------- 957 1,036 ---------- -----. -~- 134 176 ----------- ----------- 52,001 48, fJ06 243 180 37 '53 ----------- 311,650 295,888 1,092 1,054 Total < _ Unknown destination or originI~~~~~I~=~~ Grand total~~._ Ar~hanistan•• . _ Australia . _ Burma________ _ _ C'..eylon~~_ China (excluding Hong Kong) _ Formosa_ _ _ _ Gnam _ HawaiL _ Hong Kong_ _ _ _~_ India _ Indochina_ Indonesia_ __ ___ r _ Japan _ Korea _ Malaya, Federation oC _ New Caledonia_ _ _ _ New Zcaland _ Oklnawa _ Pakistan • _ Philippines _ Society Islands _ Thailand (f;iam) _ AU OtlWf pta«'s_ _ _ I~___c-I-~~I See footnotes on page 69. REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 69 Common Carrier Applications Nearly 4,600 applications were filed with the Commission by com mon carriers during the fiscal year (exclusive of Alaskan and marine mobile). The following table shows the number of applications according to class of service: Class Pending June 30, 1957 Received Disposed of Pending June 30, 1'58 Radio facilities 1,M.9 1, S'21 21m 36 37 ---------~.- 20. 225 15 790 797 62 " 43 18 3' 38 ._---------- 186 HI3 2 57 " 1 13 8 5 3,2'29 3,220 363 "18 238 7 4i) 4i) ~--·~------i 7 7 1,023 682 112 1,308 1,267 120 15 16 --------,--- • • ------------ 10 10 ---.-------- ------------ 20 29 50 '.566 4.,537\ '23 29.Subtotal Domestic: PolDt-to-point microwave radio stations 172 Local TV transmission stations 1 Rural radio stations . __ . .______ ___ 36 D{)mestic public land mobile radiostaUoDS_________ &9 Developmental stations______________________ 5 Rcgi~tratlonof Canadian radio station llcensees _ International: Fixed public telegraph~_________9 Icial industriaL TotaL_ Land transportation sl'rvices: AutomohilE' E'mer!wnc? Citizens Jli"J;hwllY truck_. I11tcrurlmnp~\-'>Sen~er_ Interurban propert)'_ Hailroad _ 'faxi('.aIL _ Urbanp~nSen\!;eL Urban proPf'rty__ Total_ Marine services: Alaskan group_ Coastal group__ Marine auxlliary group _ Marine radlonavigation hlfl.} Ship group __ Totu.l __ 176,660 176,660 380~___________380 7,626 , ,1 7"'=,26 184,566 184,566 7,249 7,249 ________======~==::::::::!Ji-~f~~-5~:~ ___________ ------------i 4, lin ------8:961 13,158 ,-------~--~-_.---- 11,884 69,451 81,335 ==-====== I, 42,1 13,589 15,013 105 442 547 4 21\, 324 25, 328 52 646 fi98 8,809 39,094 47,003 8,931 124,058 133,039 118 1,487 1,585 15,697 176,781 192,478 -------------- 35,170 381,421 416,591 ------------- '45 8,047 I 8,992 125,000 i 125, Ollll ass 6,615 ! 7,000 ------------- 7 720 717 1,312 24,337 2,),1)49 2,440 62,790 65,230 4,801 95,934 100,735 III 2,829 2,940 144 5,336 5,480 ------ 10,145 331,608 341,7."i3 ==="""==== 2,152 2,152 613 ----------- 613 1\41 1\41 2t -----75.-000- 24 189 7.5,189 3,619 75,000 78, tHI) 31,184 273,216 304,400 ====--=== 2iti, 5li8 I, 130, 696 Puhlic safety services: !,'Ire, . _ Forestry-conservation__ ,_. Hll\"hway maintenance _ Police ... _ Public safety (comblned) _ S{J(.'cial emergency__ State gumd _ TotaL _ Grand totaL 4,173 6,672 2,316 10,239 4,359 3230 , 195 54,2J2 26,946 25,227 156,500 201 9,892 238 58,385 33 til8 27:543 166,739 4,5t1O 13,122 433 1,407,26 I Represents the nUIll bel' oflicensed stations since no factual tnmsmittel' count is availableintheseservl~l. 100 REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIOKS COMMISSION Applications in Safety and Special Radio Services More than 212,000 applications for stations in the Safety and Special Radio Services were received in fiscal 1958. This is an increase of over 26,000 applications for that year. The following table com pares the nlunber of applications received in each service during the past 2 years: C]:lSS of station }{<.'cpj\"p([ 1(1~"i7 , RpCfh'cd 'I TllCfPflse or Hl58(d,-,creu~1') --I 3,56l a,635 74 J 1.099 5,211 1, Il2 53 " 28 R,15H 10,048 1, .'i90 ---- -_.--- I ------ 18. 191 21,403 3,212 --- --- 564 705 141 3,167 5,276 2,109 -- 100 HH 35 30 21 (II) 872 84O (32) 1,075 1,181 106 I "3,218 1 :/,963 (2,1.'i) I 82 " «(I) 225 212 (13) ---- ----- 9,339 11,462 2,123 =-"=,-= 7fi7 3Rl (3.'\4) 444 210 (234) 49 109 OJ 10 32 22 23,330 27,437 4,107 ------------ - 24,600 28,171 a,iiil == ==------= =-- --- =--== 1,589 2. HJ.t ,,,l; 1,174 I. 704 530 -- 1,387 I 1. 771 381 I S.502 U,038 47f> 15.1 i 168 15 I,39~1,745 352 .------::::::::~J~I gI I ·~---.----~~ - __ 11,261 i I:J.6H 1-- 2,31\3 ~~~1~12~ijWl==:W,55~- l:'uhlicsaf",~yservices: Firc "___ _ Fon'~try-conserl"atiOll_ Highway mllintt'nan('(' __ PoUc,,_" "_. _ Public safety (comhined)_ Special eJnt'rgl'nry_ State gllard . _ Lfleal gtwl'mmeuL Total_ Grand tota1_._ Lmld trmu:portatillfl services; Automohileemt:'fj~eney_ CiHzl'ns __ . _ IIi';!;hw:'\y'l'mck _ Intf'rurban passellger __ InU\rlIrban pWPl'rt.y _ Rnilroad __ 'l'a.:o;i.cab . _ Urbnn passengeL Urban property_ TotaL Industrial $('1'''\('('"",: Business_" _ Forest products ._ Industrial radiolocatioll __ Low paWl'r industriaL. "'lotioJl pictlln'. Petroleum_ Power _ Helay press .. __ Rprcial industrial Total Aviation ser'\'iC('s' A(,I'OIlH'ltical and fixed group __ Aircn,Ji ',!;H}UP_ A\"iation auxiliary graUJ} ,_ Avinl.ioll radiOlH\Yigntion land_ Ch'n nil' p'ItroL Amateur and disastl'l" servhws: Amateur._" Disa.ster _ RACE.'L Total l\Iurine ser\'lcf's; .>\ laskfl.1l group_ Coa~talgroup_ -Marine a\ulliary l!:roup _ Marin!' radiolocation hllld_ Ship group__ Total Broadcast Services TELEVISION lTV) BROADCAST SERVICE TV Expansion Though unresolyed problems impede the continued expansion of the Nation's competitiYe TV service, noteworthy progress has been made in the 6 years since the present TV alloeation plan and engi neering standards were adopted looking toward at least 1 TV seryice in eyery area, at least 1 local TV station in the largest possible num ber of communities, and multiple TV services in as many communi ties and areas as possible. It is estimated that over 90 percent of the population is now within service range of at least 1 TV station and that over 75 percent are within range of 2 .or more stations. It is also reported that over 83 percent of all homes have 1 or more TV receivers and that over 46 mil lion TV sets are in use. In addition, this Nation is claimed to be the only one having regular TV color service. As of June 5, 1958, there were 501 commercial TV stations (419 VHF and 82 UHF) and 31 educational TV stations (25 VHF and 6 UHF) on the air in 308 communities. As of that date, a total of 663 commercial stations (461 VHF and 202 UHF) and 53 educational stations (32 VHF and 21 UHF) had been authorized. Applications for 122 commercial stations (89 VHF and 33 UHF) and 15 educa tional stations (6 VHF and 9 UHF) were then pending. In addition, there were TV translator stations which are discussed under a sepa rate heading in this chapter. In 1952, when the present TV allocation plan and standards were a(lopted, only 108 commercial stations (all VHF) were in operation and only 63 communities had 1 or more local stations. The number of TV receiYers in use at that time was about 15 million. TV Problems In recent years it has been eyident that, despite positiYe advances in the development of TV- service, many factors are deterring a fuller attainment of the Commission's objectives for a nationwide competi tive TV service. Many people liye beyond the effective range of operating stations. Additional numbers have only a single service, which in some instances is of doubtful quality. Numerous commu- -lH-ll;W -;'3H--8 101 102 REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMlVIISSION nities do not yet have a local outlet, and in many of the larger markets the opportunity for the growth of multiple, competing TV stations has been limited. A chief deterrent, over which the Commission has no control, stems from the high costs of construction, programing, and operation of TV stations. It is generally recognized, however, that the greatest difficulties are encountered in achieving successful operation of sta tions in the UHF band. Since there are only 12 channels in the VHF bands, it was contemplated in 1952 that extensive use of the 70 channels in the UHF band would be required to attain a nationwide TV service. However, UHF stations have had great difficulty in getting established and in competing with VHF stations. The head start by the VHF system, the present disparity in performance between UHF and VHF transmitting and receiving equipment, and the small number of sets in use and being manufactured that are capable of receiving both UHF and VHF signals are the principal reasons for the difficulties experienced by UHF stations. Other factors, such as the preference of advertisers and other program sources for VHF and UHF outlets, have flowed from the principal reasons and aggravate the UHF difficulties. In November of 1955, the Commission instituted a proceeding in docket 11532 to consider whether revisions of the TV allocation system might remove hindrances to the further expansion of TV service. Several hundred comments filed by TV broadcasters and other elements of the industry proposed an extensive array of reme dies. Their scope varied widely, ranging from channel reassignments affecting a single city to major revisions affecting the entire country. The methods proposed included such diverse and mutually incon sistent approaches as conversion to an all-VHF system or an all-UHF system, or continued use of both bands under various conditions. Some proposals envisaged possibility of obtaining more VHF channels, the use of the present 12 VHF channels under reduced spacings, or both. Some contemplated revising the technical stand ards and policies; others advocated their maintenance. After considering the relative merits of these comments and pro posals, the Commission on June 26, 1956, outlined a long-range and interim course of action which it believed was in the public interest to pursue. Long-Range Program As a long-range consideration, the Commission decided that a thorough analysis should be made of the possibilities of making basic chang-es in the TV allocation structure to increase opportllnitieR for impro\Tement and expansion. This study is still in Pl'og-l'l?ss. REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 103 Of all the suggested solutions in docket 11532, the Commission was of the view that the proposal to change all or a substantial portion of TV broadcasting to UHF ultimately would, if feasible, have cer tain advantages. It felt that if UHF transmission and reception could be substantially improved, if VHF channels could be deleted without an overall loss of service, and if the difficulties inherent in so major a frequency shift could be overcome, many of the CUI'I'ent problems would be eliminated. Under an all-UHF system, stations would be able to compete on a much more comparable basis techni cally and competitive opportunities among broadcasters, the net works, and other program and revenue sources would be enhanced. }foreover, the receiver incompatability problem would vanish. The Commission concluded that a thorough exploration should be made of this long-range aspect and, as a fiI'St step, decided that a program of research was needed to obtain factual information on the full technical potentialities of UHF so that its capacity to sup plant VHF broadcasting in whole or in substantial part could be evaluated. Accordingly, the Commission invited several industry organizations to assist in this program and also asked interested parties to submit comments and data on a continuing basis while study of long-range solutions was in progress. Televi.,ion Allocations Study Organization.-The Television Allo cations Study Organization (TASO) was formed in January of 1957, following a meeting initiated by the Commission in September of 1956, with five representative segments of the TV industry (the National Association of BroadcasteI'S, Electronic Industries Associa tion, Joint Council on Educational Television, Committee for Com petitive Television, and Association of Maximum Service Telecasters, Inc.). TASO has as its principal objective the development of technical information and engineering principles concerning UHF and VHF service. Six panels were created to deal with particular parts of the general program, and various committees within these panels to handle specific matters. The nature of the work of these panels, which is still in progress, may be gathered from the following brief description of their tasks: Panel 1 is appraising the performance of transmitters, transmitting antennas, and other transmitter equipment for both VHF and UHF broadcasting. Panel 2 is making the same sort of an appraisal of the performance of receiving equipment. Panel 3 is observing and measuring the relative performance of VHF and UHF receiving equipment and comparing picture quality and signal strength. Pa.nel •<1 is studying waye propagation in the VHF and UHF bands and gathering additional data by field measurements. Panel 5 is prepar- 104 REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION iug propagation elUTes and analyzing pertinent technical factors nee,led to establish standards for acceptable servIce in both bands. Panel 6 is e""luating picture quality under different conditions of signal strength, interference, find electrical noise. ~r[orethan 230 engineers from some 131 different concerns have served on the seve,.a1 TASO panels and their numerous committees andsubcommitte('.~.Commission staff members are participating on the panels as observers. TASO is expected to issue its final report by the eud of the calen dar year. The findings will provide valuable tools for the Commis sion's continuing long-range study and interim efforts to overcome the barriers to expansion of TV service. Interim Program Recoguizing that the long-range allocation study and the imple mentatioll of any overall measures might take considerable time, possibly several years, the Commission decided that, in the interim, it would be desirable to consider deintermixture (separation of VHF and UHF assignments) in individual communities where it could be shown that this would augment opportunities for the construction and sl1ccessfu1 operation of additional stations and increase program sen"iees to the public. Deintel'mixture can be achieved either by increasing the number of local VHF assignments, where feasible and possible, or, alternatively, by removing local VHF assignments and substituting UHF channels. Consequently, at the conclusion of the general allocation proceed ing in June of 1956, the Commission inaugurated rulemaking looking toward deintermixture in certain cities. These and subsequent pro ceedings are reviewed under "Deintermixture." 'While the Commission has devoted much time to the consideration of deintermixture proposals, it has also considered many requests for rulemaking not involving deintermixture which looked to addi tional channel assignments and reassignments to improve the TV situation in numerous communities and areas. These included pro posals for shifting UHF and VHF assignments from one city to anot.her and dropping in UHF and VHF assignment.s where they would not affect the balance of existing or foreseeable TV operations in the communities concerned. Typically, these channel reassign ments and "drop-ins" have involved communities where either no station lla(l yet been built or where local stations were either all UHF or all VHF. At the year's end, requested reassignments had been granted in 44 cases and denied in 4 cases. Thirteen additional pro posals were pending. Deinte1"miwtuTe.-In the last 2 years the Commission, after study of local circumstances, determined that deintermixture would im- REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 105 prove the TV situation in 12 communities and areas. After appro priate proceedings, Springfield and Peoria, Ill.; Elmira, N. Y., and 'Valla 'Valla, 'Vash., were made all UHF communities. Further proceedings are required before Evansville, Ind., and Fresno, Calif., can be made all UHF. In six other cases, VHF channels were added to Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, Va.; Albany-Schenectady Troy, N. Y.; New Orleans, La.; Charleston, S. C.; Duluth and )finnesota-Superior, 'Vis., and Miami, Fla. The Commission was unable to conclude that the advantages of deiutermixture would connterbalance the attendant disadvantages and therefore denied proposals concerning Hartfol'd, Conn.; lYladison, 'Vis.; Columbia, S. C.; Erie, Pa., Champaign, Ill. In other rulenlaking proceedings involving Moses Lake, Wash., and Lafayette, Ind., proposals for the assignment of VHF channels were denied because they would have created a VHF-UHF inter mixture situation. Under consideration at the year's end were proposals to add additional VHF channels to Providence, R. 1.; Columbus, Ga.; Baton Rouge, La., and 'Vinston-Salem-High Point Greensboro, N. C. Since then, the additional VHF channel to Provi dence was denied and one was added to TVinston-Salem-High Point Greensboro but is subject to a petition for reconsideration. The Commission considered and denied requests fop rulemaking on dein termixture proposals involving St. Joseph, Tenn.; Clearfield, Pa.; Charlotte and Raleigh, N. c.; Spartanburg, S. C.; Biloxi, Miss., and Fort Smith, Ark. At the close of the year requests for deintermixture rule making were under consideration for Corpus Christi, Tex.; Sacramento, San Francisco, Bakersfield and Fresno, Calif.; Birming ham and Montgomery, Ala., and Rochester, Syracuse and Elmira, N. Y. Mileage separatiolls.-The Commission's interim program of selec tive deintermixture and other channel reassignments has been facili tated by relaxation on July 19, 1956, of rules governing the method of measuring minimum spacings between cochannel and adjacent channel stations. Previously, the controlling distance was measured between an existing station transmitter or the post office of the city in which the new assignment was proposed. Finding that in some instances these distances fell below the minimum by a small margin, the Commission revised its rules to permit measuring distances be tween transmitter sites to meet Inillimum separation requirements. This has afforded needed flexibility and has permitted the assign ment of new channels to communities and the reassignment of channels in a number of cases which previously would not have been possible. 106 REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Satellite stations.-In August of 1954 the Commission inaugurated a policy of considering applications for new TV stations even though no provision for local programs was proposed. The purpose was to increase incentive for installing TV stations in the smaller markets by eliminating the cost of studio equipment and local programing. These stations are commonly called satellite stations, although the term is not used in the Commission's rules or tabulations. They are licensed as regular TV stations and are required to meet the same teclmical and other rules which apply to regular TV stations except that they are not required to originate local programing and may limit their broadcasts to duplicating the programs of other stations. They may at any time, however, originate local programs, and. a number of the UHF and VHF stations authorized on this basis are now providing a limited amount of local programing. Translator stations.-Rules were adopted in May of 1956 to pro vide for the licensing of translator stations as a means of extend.ing TV service to small communities and areas beyond the normal service range of regular TV stations. This new type of station uses relatively inexpensive, low-powered equipment to receive signals of distant TV stations (VHF, UHF, or other translator stations), con vert (translate) them to one of the upper 14 UHF TV channels (channels 70-83) which it has been assigned, and retransmit them in areas needing TV service. The past year saw increasing interest in TV translator operation. At its end, 156 translators had been authorized as compared to 74 in 1957, and 92 were on the air, as compared to 41 the year previous. For many people, this was their first TV service. In some areas more than one translator is in use, thus making additional TV service available. It is estimated that about $875,000 has been invested in TV trans lator facilities and that over 180,000 all-channel TV receivers or UHF converters have been purchased for use in areas served by translators. In some places translators are operated by local governmental bodies, community groups or by private concerns and, in other places, by regular TV broadcast station licensees desiring to improve their coverage. There is no fixed maximum on the number of translators which can be licensed to a single entity. Thus, community groups, by establishment of three translators, have permitted the reception of all the TV national networks in areas otherwise without service. Experience with TV translators reveals that they are dependable and capable of providing good reception out to an average distance of 15 to 20 miles. The maximum power of translators has been in creased from 10 to 100 watts. REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 107 Booster operation.-"Booster" operation is another technique for extending service to small, remote areas which the Commission is examining in current rulemaking proceedings in dockets 11331 and 12116. TV boosters use apparatus to receive the signals of an outside regular TV station and to amplify and retransmit them for local reception. They differ from TV translators in that the signals received from a parent station are retransmitted on the same channel used by the parent station. Experimental data obtained from a booster operation in conjunc tion with station ,VATR on UHF channel 53 in Waterbury, Conn., indicate that the use of boosters to fill in "shadows" (areas of weak signals caused by natural or manmade obstruction) within the nor mal service area of UHF stations is less complicated than similar use in the VHF bands. This is because conventional UHF receiving antennas are able to discrimiuate betweeu the signals retransmitted by a booster and the signals of the originating station much more easily than do more complex and expensive receiving antennas in the VHF bands. ,Vhile no provision has yet been made for licensing boosters on a regular basis, the Commission has under study in docket 11331 pro posed rules which would permit UHF stations to make limited use of boosters to reach unserved spots within their grade A service areas. "Repeater" stations.-Consideration is being given in docket 12116 to the feasibility of authorizing a low power repeater-type of booster station in both the VHF and UHF bands within limits which would permit them to render adequate service in areas where the signals of regular TV stations cannot be satisfactorily received. Community Antenna TV Systems Community antenna TV systems have been instltlled in numerous communities and areas where the direct reception of regular TV stations is nonexistent or unsatisfltctory. It is estimated that over 550 such systems are in operation, Itnd trade reports indicate that some half a million people receive their service. CATV systems employ receiving Itntennas for off-the-air pickup of the signals of regular TV stations for relay by cable or wire to customers paying for the service. In some instances, the signals or distant TV stations are transmitted by microwave facilities furnished by common carriers and fed into the local cable distribution system. CATV systems do not transmit over the air for direct reception by the general public, and their operation does not require authori zation by the Commission. However, they are subject to Commission 108 REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION rules which prescribe limitations on their radiations in order to pre vent interference to licensed radio and TV services. On April 2, 1958, the Commission held that its regulatory juris diction does not extend to CATV systems. Impact of Satellite, Translator, Booster, and CATV Operations On May 22, 1958, the Commission launched a factfinding inquiry in docket 12443 to evaluate the actual and potential impact on the growth of the TV broadcast service by satellite, translator, booster, and community antenna operations. ,Vhile the use of these various kinds of facilities provides a means of extending TV service to small communities lacking local stations and to areas beyond the range of satisfactory TV service, all of them pose problems, in greater or lesser degree, relating to their competi tive impact on regular TV stations, as well as other problems peculiar to each type of facility. The matter is further complicated by the f"ct that these systems "ugment the service of TV st"tions. Before endeavoring to reach conclusions as to how these problems should be dealt with and the policies which would best serve the public interest, the Commission felt that study of their economic impact was neces sary and interested parties were invited to submit comments. These are. under study. Noncommercial Educational TV On July 16, 1958, the Commission assigned a second educational TV ch"nnel [now cl",nnel16J to Pittsburgh, Pa. This is the first city to be given two such assignments. It was done by I'Ulemakillg on request by Metropolitan Pittsburgh Educational Station which has been operating station WQED there on channel 13 since Aprif of 1954. WQED said that it needed the second channel to provide a specialized educational service to industries and professions in the area and to enlarge the educational programs it now provides for classroom and home instruction. There is no prohibition on a licensee from operating more than one educational station in the same area if the local situation warrants. Counting the new educational reserv"tion at Pittsburgh, this brings the total number of TV channels reserved for noncommercial educa tional use to 251 (86 VHF and 1'71 UHF). This is 15 more than first allocated in 1952. As of June 5, 1958, there were 31 educational stations on the air (25 VHF and 6 UHF). Fifty-three (32 VHF and 21 UHF) construction permits for additional educational stations were outstanding, and 15 (6 VHF and 9 UHF) applications for new stations were pending. At the same time last year, 24 educational TV stations (19 VHF and 5 UHF) were on the air. REPORT OF THE FEDERALCO~lMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION 109 During the year the Commission considered a number of proposals to make unused educational reservations available for commercial use either by deleting the reserved channels or substituting another channel. The Commission's policy has been to retain the educational reservation where there has been an active interest on the part of educators and educational institutions and where affirmative plans for the utilization of the educational channel have been taken. This is in accord with the original basis upon which the educational reservations were made. In reserving TV channels for educational USe in 1952 the Commission recognized that educational interests faced financial and other difficulties not encountered by commercial interests and that they require more time to prepare for TV opera tion. It felt, however, that it would not be in the public interest to continue unused reservations for an excessively long period and that they should be reviewed from time to time. On September 25, 1957, the Commission concluded that the idle VHF educational reservation at Eugene, Oreg., should be made avail nble :for commercial use. No showing was lnade in this rulemaking proceeding that the educational interests had taken any action looking toward use of the educational channel, and in view of the demon strated immediate need for an additional commercial station at Eugene, it was not believed that continued retention of the educa tional reservation was warranted, especially since the area is now served by a new educational TV station at Corvallis. This is the third time the Commission has unreserved unused VHF educational channels. Previous actions affected Weston, Vt'". Va., and College Station, Tex. In the College Station case, the VHF channel reservation was replaced by a UHF channel for education, and the VHF channel was assigned to Bryan-College Station, Tex., for commercial use. Petitions to unreserve or change educational reservations were denied in proceedings affecting Jacksonville, Fla. (August 1, 1957) ; Durham, N. C. (December 11, 1957); Hartford, Conn. (February 12, 1958) ; San Antonio, Tex. (February 26, 1958), and Deuton, Tex. (June 4,1958), whell it was shown that educators in those commu nities were working to take advantage of their reservations. On March 21, 1958, a VHF channel was reserved for education at Carbondale, Ill., because of the need shown by local educational interests. A petition to change channel 8 at 'Vaycross, Ga., from commercial to educational use was under consideration at the year Md. . Subscription TV On October 17, 1957, the Commission issued its first report in the rulemaking proceeding (docket 12279) which had been inaugurated 110 REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION in February of 1955 to consider proposals for the broadcast of some TV programs for which a direct charge would be paid by viewers. In that report the Commission concluded that it had jurisdiction to authorize subscription TV operations if it were found to be in the public interest to do so. It added, however, that before judgment could be made concerning definite establishment of a toll-TV service it would be desirable to observe the operation in limited trials under circumstances which would insure the continued availability of free programing to the communities in which these trials might be con ducted. Final decision concerning the conduct of any trial would depend on the Commission's evaluation of specific proposals to be submitted in conformity with conditions set out in the report. Hearings on subscription TV were conducted by the House Inter state and Foreign Commerce Committee in .Tanuary of 1956. On February 6, 1958, that committee adopted a resolution expressing its belief that subscription TV authorizations should not be granted unless and until the Communications Act is amended to specifically empower it. The Senate Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee on February 19, 1958, recommended Senate adoption of a similar resolution, on which the Senate has taken no action. In view of the possible adoption of prohibiting or limiting legis lation, as evinced by the introduction of numerous bills on this sub ject in both houses, the Commission, on February 26, 1958, issued a second report announcing that the status quo would be maintained until after the adjournment of the 85th Congress. In July, the House Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee informed the Commission that it would not be possible to conduct further hearings on this subject during that session, and requested that the Commission continue to maintain the status quo until after the 1st session of the 86th Congress so that it would have had an opportunity to hold hearings and consider the desirability of adopting legislation on this subject. On July 24, 1958, the Commission informed the House committee that the present status would be maintained as requested; that, mean while, the Commission would accept and process any proposals for trial subscription TV operations which might be submitted, but would withhold grants for the period designated. Only one applica tion was received during the year, but it did not meet the prescribed trial requirements. TV Table af Assignments TV channels are allocated to communities throughout the country in accordance with certain technical standards and principles on the basis of a fixed table of assignments adopted in 1952. TV applicants REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 111 are required to apply for channels assigned to the communities listed in the table. However, provision is made for chauges in the table, and it has been amended several hundred times. During the year, the Commission acted on proposals in 26 rule making proceedings which resulted in table changes. Rulemaking also involved a number of other proposals for changes which the Commission found did not warrant adoption. At the end of the year, 12 proceedings for changes in the table were outstanding and approx imately 30 petitions for other changes were under consideration. Many of the pending proposals seek complex chain-action changes in assignments of many communities and involve policy, legal and technical problems, especially where deintermixture is sought. Consideration was given during the year in docket 12005 to a proposal for allocating commercial TV channels largely on the basis of individual applications, as AM broadcast frequencies are assigned, rather than by the preseut allocation table. On October 10, 1957, the Commission decided that the present procedure for assigning TV channels should not be changed. It felt that general deletion of the allocation table would be inappropriate while the current study of possible basic changes in the TV allocations structure is in progress. TV Test Signal TV broadcasters and other segments of the industry have been experimenting with various types of TV test signals and studying the problems connected with their utilization. Test signals are trans mitted during the interval when no picture is being sent and are used to check transmissions and equipment. Rulemaking was commenced in April of 1957 to consider whether a standard TV test signal should be adopted and whether it should be required of all stations or made optional. At the same time, TV stations were given blanket authority to transmit test signals during programing so that they would be in a better position to file comments and data in this proceeding. TV Frequency and Modulation Monitors On May 28, 1958, the Commission postponed for another year to June 1, 1959-the effective date of the rules requiring TV stations to have type-approved frequency and modulation monitors at the station whenever the transmitter is in operation. In light of the continued development of more stable frequency control circuits in all types of broadcast transmitters, the Commission is reviewing its requirements regarding continuously operating frequency monitors to ascertain whether they are still needed to insure that stations keep within the prescribed frequency tolerances. 112 REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COJ\;D.IUNICATlOXS COMMISSION TV Agreements With Canada and Mexico An agreement with Canada concerns the assignment of VHF and UHF stations within 250 miles of the border. An existing agreement with Mexico relates only to VHF assignments along the Mexican border. However, during November 1957 a pact was drafted which became effective July 16, 1958. It governs UHF assignments within 200 miles of that border. STANDARD lAM I BROADCAST SERVICE AM Marches On At the close of fiscal 1958, the number of authorized AM broadcast stations had climbed to 3,353. This was a gain of 115 for the year as compared with 218 for the previous year. As has been the case for many years, most of the new grants were for daytime only operation. Of the 1958 total, 3,253 held operating authorizations, or 174 more than at the close of 1957. Pending applications for new stations totaled 412, which was 19 less than at the same time in 1957. Clear Channel Reallocations In April of 1958, the Commission completed its review of the lengthy and complex record in the clear channel proceeding (dockct 6741) which had been inaugurated in 1954 to consider revisions of the rules goverJlillg the u::;e of 4:7 .A1\-I frequencies which are desig nated as clear channels. These are channels on which the dominant class I-A and class I-B stations are given sufficient protection from cochannel and adjacent channel interference to enable them to render wide area service to remote communities and rural areas not reached by other AM stations. Some of the parties to this procceding proposed increasing the present 50 kilowatt maximum power for class I stations up to 500 or 750 kilowatts. Others favored retaining the present maximum power but relaxing the rules which up to now have precluded the night time operation of other stations on frequencies used by the 24 class I-A clear channel stations. In further rulemaking, adopted April 15, 1958, the Commission stated its tentative conclusions, based on the present record, and invited comments on proposals to eliminate the exclusive nighttime use of 12 of the class I-A clear channels in New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Rochester, Cleveland, Detroit, and St. Louis. The proposed reallocations look toward assigning additional class I stations in 12 western cities located in less well-served areas and, subsequent to the assignment of those stations, the possible additional assignment of class II stations on those channels to bring REPORT OF THE HDERAL CO;VIMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 113 a first primary or groundwave seTvice to "white" areas, while afford ing protection to the class I stations on the channels. The proposal contemplates no duplication of nighttime service on any of the remaining 24 class I-A channels. Their status quo would be maintained pending possible future consideration of proposals for higher power to enable stations on these channels to cover under served areas. The Commission is giving high priority to the task of reaching final decision in this proceeding. Daytime Skywave In a separate proceeding (docket 8333), the Commission is con sidering the desirability of affording class I clear channel stations some degree of protection against interfering skywave signals from coclutnnel stations. Final decision awaited resolution of the problems raised in the next noted proc-eeding. Extended Hours for Daytime Stations Parties to this proceeding (docket 12274) snbmitted, during the spring and summer of 1958, voluminous comments on a proposal of the Daytime Broadcasters Association that stations now confined to operation between sunrise and sunset be perIllitted to operate from ;) a. m. or sunrise, whichever is earlier, to 7 p. m. or sunset, whichever is later. On September 19, 1958, this petition was denied. The Commission concluded that, among other things, the population which would gain sen-ice by the proposal would be vastly exceeded by the population (particularly in the rural areas) which would lose service because of the additional interference that would result. This interference would also affect foreign stations in violation of international agreement. The DaytiIne Broadcasters Association petitioned for reconside.ration. Daytime Power Increase of Class IV Stations Kew rules, effective July 7, 1958, provide for consideration of applications of class IV (local) 1\;;1 stations for daytime only in ereases in power from the previous 250 watts maximum up to 1 kilo 'YaH, \vith directional antennas if necessary, to afford previously required protection to cochannel stations. The use of directional antennas to enable closer spacing between class IV stations is specifi cally precluded. Approximately 25 applications for increased power have been flle,!. Howe,"er, action on them is being deferred until the rule chunge can be coordinated with other signatories to the Xorth American Hegional Broadcasting Agreement (NARBA) and the recently signed agreement between the United States Hnd lHexico, both of which await Senate ratification. 114 REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION NARBA, to which the United States became a party in 1950, places a 250-watt ceiling on the power of class IV stations, and the bilateral agreement signed January 29, 1957, by the United States and Mexico permits use of daytime power up to 1 kilowatt in all areas of the United States more than 62 miles from the Mexican border. "Unique" Program Service On November 7, 1957, the so-called unique program service rule was deleted. This rule afforded AM stations protection from inter ference in areas where they furnished a unique program service beyond their normally protected contours. Program service was held to be unique if 90 percent of the population of the area so served did not receive service from any other station. The Commission decided (docket 11896) that the rule had served little or no useful purpose, its provisions were too vague and indefinite to be of assistance in processing applications, it prompted uncertainty as to the protection to be afforded, it might discourage applicants for new and improved AM facilities and, in general, it was an unsatisfactory allocation tool. North American Regional Broadcasting Agreement Prior to 1930, interference to domestic AM broadcast service from foreign sources was no great problem. However, during the ensuing 10 years iuterference, particularly from Latin American countries, reached serious proportions. This situation was largely rectified in 1941 by the first North American Regional Broadcasting Agreement (NARBA). This agreement served its purpose during its term of 1) years, and was extended nntil 1949 by an interim agreement. Before a new agreement could be negotiated, certain of the Latin American countries became dissatisfied with some of the terms and made a number of station assignments contra.ry to agreement which resulted in increased interference to certain stations in this country. A new NARBA (1950) provided, in addition to reestablishing sta tion assignment procedures, for correcting additional interference resulting from expiration of the interim agreement. Mexico is not signatory to the new pact. However, on ,Tanuary 29, 1957, after negotiations extending over several years, a bilateral agreement between this country and Mexico with respect to AM broadcasting was concluded. To become effective, the 1950 NARBA must be ratified by three of its major signers-the United States, Canada, and Cuba. Cuba and Canada ratified it in 1951 and 1957, respectively. To date the United States has not, although the Senate Committee on Foreign REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 115 Relations held hearings in July of 1953, and again in July of 1958, on both NARBA and the separate United States-Mexico pact. In the absence of an effective agreement with other North American countries regarding AM broadcasting, the Commission has adhered to a policy of making no new assignments or modifications which would be inconsistent with old or new agreements or understandings. The other countries have, in general, followed similar policies until recently. The result is that, while the interference to United States stations which developed upon expiration of the interim agreement has continued at a high level, a complete breakdown in coordinated assignment practices did not occur. However, there is increasing evidence that this voluntary conformation is slowly deteriorating to a point where even greater interference from foreign Sources is to be expected unless these agreements can be made effective. FREQUENCY MODULATION IFMI BROADCAST SERVICE Commercial FM Continues Upswing For the second consecutive year, commercial FM broadcast stations gained in number. Of 634 authorized stations at the end of the year, 548 were on the air. This is a gain of 74 and 18 respectively over the previous year. New commercial grants increased from 40 in 1957 to 98 during the year. This is the largest number since 1948. Fifty-seven applications for new commercial stations were pending as against 24 the year previous. Competition for new FM commercial outlets is reflected in the fact that 23 applications were in hearing. Renewed interest in FM broadcast is due primarily to the ability of stations to augment their income through supplemental services and the possibility of extending such services through multiplex operation. More applications for new commercial FM facilities were received from California than from any other State. The demand has ex ceeded the facilities available in some large cities and it has been necessary to designate applications for hearing in New York City, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. These are the first FM hearings since the late forties. Six States do not now have any commercial FM stations. They are Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyom ing. No FM stations have ever been authorized iu Alaska. Hawaii has 1 commercial station, Puerto Rico has 2, and 1 is authorized in the Virgin Islands but has not yet commenced operation. 116 REPORT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Subsidiary Operations Commercial FM stations may, pursuant to rules adopted by the Commission in March of 1955, obtain Subsidiary Communications Authorizations (SeA) to engage in certain types of specialized sup plpmentary activities as all adjunct to their regularF~fbroadcast service. This subsidiary operation was authorized to enable FM licensees obtain additional revenue. SCA service is limited to special programing of music, news, time, weather reports, and similar sub jects for reception by business and other subscribers for a fee. An example is supplying programs of a predominantly musical nature to commercial establishments. "Storecasting" is designed for retail establishments and "transitcasting" for public vehicles, such as buses and streetcars. The Commission initially authorized FM stations to conduct func tional music operatlons on It"nlUltiplex'~basis at any time, or on a. temporary "sin1plex" basls outside of broadcast hours. 'Vhen functional music programs are multiplexed, they cannot be heard on ordinary FM receivers since they are transmitted on a subchannel simultaneously with regular FM programs on the main channel. 'When simplexed, they can be heard on FM receivers since they are transmitted on the same carrier used for FM broadcasting. Special receivers sold or leased to subscribers eliminate or amplify certain portions of the simplexed programs (usually spoken matter) by means of an inaudible supersonic (beep) signal. The Commission emphasized in 1955 that simplexing was being permitted for 1 year only because of the unavailability of multiplex equipment at that time and that, in order to protectF~lbroadcast, it was ultimately necessary for all fuuctional music operations to be conducted on a multiplex basis. Becr!.llse of the continued unavaila bility of multiplex equipmeIlt, simplexed opel'atiolls "'ere permitted until .Tuly 1, 1057. Mnltiplex equipment is now ltmilable in sufficient quantities to llleet present needs and, therefore, no new au thorizations for simplexing have been granted since that date. Ex tensions of authorization to continue simplex operations have been ,granted in caRes where SeA holders are in the process of converting their receivjng equipment from simplex to multiplex. These authori zatiolls ,,,ill expire October 1, H),,8. As of ,Tnly 30, 1958, 82 FM st,, tions held SCA's for multiplex operation. The Commission is now considering whether, in the light of SC,\. experience over the past 3 years, additional uses of multiplexing by FM broadcast stations to provide various subsidiary forms of com munication sClTices would be feasihle and appropriate,. Interest in expandingF~Imultiplexing has grown steadily. JfallY of tllP pro posed new uses would Illean ;ulditionall'en~lluefor F:;\I bro