Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau June 2012 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. Copies may be purchased by contacting Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800) 378-3160, or via their website at www.bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats. Table of Contents Introduction...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Connection speeds ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Figure 1(a) Distribution of Reportable Connections by Downstream Speed ...............................3 Figure 1(b) Distribution of Reportable Connections by Upstream Speed....................................4 Figure 2(a) Distribution by Upstream Speed of Reportable Connections with Downstream Speed Below 3 mbps ............................................................................5 Figure 2(b) Distribution by Upstream Speed of Reportable Connections with Downstream Speed at Least 3 mbps but Below 6 mbps............................................6 Figure 2(c) Distribution by Upstream Speed of Reportable Connections with Downstream Speed at Least 6 mbps..........................................................................7 Providers by census trac t by connection speed ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Figure 3(a) Percentages of Households Located in Census Tracts Where Providers Report Residential Fixed-Location Connections of Various Speeds.........................8 Figure 3(b) Percentages of Households Lo cated in Census Tracts Where Providers Report Residential Fixed-Location Connections of Various Speeds or Operate a Mobile Wireless Network Capable of Delivering Service of Various Speeds......................................................................................................9 Internet access adoption. ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 Figure 4 Fixed-Location Co nnections 1999-2011 .................................................................10 Other report highlights...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 Residential subscribership ..............................................................................................................11 Household adoption by speed tier ............................................................................................... ...11 Census tract and county shares of households with reportable connections ..................................12 Household adoption rates and subscribership demographics .........................................................12 Maps of providers by census tract .............................................................................................. ....12 Remainder of the report ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 Detailed Summary Statistics: The Nation...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Detailed Summary Statistics: The States ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 Detailed Summary Statistics: Counties and Census Tracts ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Detailed Correlation Results: Demographic Measures ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 7 Technical Notes ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Glossary ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 i Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 Introduction . This report summarizes information about Internet access connections over 200 kilobits per second (kbps) in at least one direction in service in the United States on June 30, 2011, as collected by FCC Form 477. Form 477 gathers standardized information about subscribership to Internet access services in the fifty states, District of Columbia, and inhabited insular areas (American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands). The information is reported by telephone companies, cable system operators, terrestrial wireless service providers, satellite service providers, and other facilities-based providers of advanced telecommunications capability.1 Notable developments between June 2010 and June 2011 include: • Internet connections overall are growing. The number of connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction increased by 31% year-over-year to 206 million. • Growth is particularly high in mobile Internet subscriptions, but fixed-location connections also continue to increase. The number of mobile subscriptions grew to nearly 120 million – up 59% from June 2010. The number of fixed-location connections increased by 6% year-over-year, to nearly 87 million. • Both fixed and mobile services are shifting to higher speeds. The share of fixed connections with speeds at or above the availability benchmark adopted in the Sixth Broadband Deployment Report increased from 51% to 56% of total fixed connections. Among mobile wireless subscriptions, the share increased from 6% to 14%. The report reflects the Commission’s efforts to improve the way it collects, uses, and disseminates data by focusing in detail on reported connection speeds. Before presenting that information, we note two important points about the Form 477 data. • First, the data track subscribership, or adoption, of services of different speeds; they do not directly measure the availability of services of different speeds. That is, if service connections of different speeds are available to a particular consumer for purchase – from one or more suppliers – then only the purchased connection is counted by Form 477. • Second, the reported connection speed is typically based on the advertised speed of the purchased service, such as the advertised “up to” speed of a wired service or the advertised range of “typical speeds” of a mobile wireless service. It is possible that the purchased service will not operate at its advertised speed at all times.2 1 See the Technical Notes and the Glossary that appear at the end of this report for more-detailed information about the Form 477 data collection and the meaning of terms used in this report. 2 The Commission has worked in partnership with a third-party measurement company, SamKnows, to test actual consumer broadband speeds. See, e.g., Federal Communications Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology and Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Measuring Broadband America: A Report on Consumer Wireline Broadband Performance in the U.S. (August 2011), available at www.fcc.gov/measuring- broadband-america. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 1 This is the sixth report to include details about subscribership differences among census tracts and counties, as well as subscribership differences among the states.3 And we continue to illustrate correlations of subscribership and demographic measures. Connection speeds . The Form 477 program categorizes reportable connections into 72 speed tiers defined by eight ranges of downstream and nine ranges of upstream speed. In this overview discussion, we organize the extensive information collected for June 2011 into three groups of downstream speeds and three groups of upstream speeds. For the breakpoints between these groups, we use the Form 477- defined breakpoints that the Commission discussed as potential proxies for the broadband availability benchmark adopted in the Sixth Broadband Deployment Report.4 These Form 477-defined breakpoints are 3 mbps and 6 mbps for downstream speeds and 768 kbps and 1.5 mbps for upstream speeds.5 3 The Form 477 program began collecting state-level data in 2000. Census tract-level data were first collected in December 2008. For an overview of program history, see High-Speed Services for Internet Access: Status as of December 31, 2008 (February 2010) (December 2008 High-Speed Report) at pp. 1-4, available at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html. Readers who are interested in historical trends in the Form 477 data should note the changes in reporting requirements that were effective in 2008 and earlier, in 2005. 4 The Commission benchmarked broadband as a transmission service that enables an end user actually to download Internet content at 4 megabits per second (mbps) and to upload Internet content at 1 mbps over the service provider’s network. See Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amended by the Broadband Data Improvement Act, GN Docket Nos. 09-137, 09-51, Report, 25 FCC Rcd 95560, 9563, para. 11 (2010) (Sixth Broadband Deployment Report). 5 See Sixth Broadband Deployment Report, 25 FCC Rcd at 9568, para. 20. As explained there, the Commission decided to evaluate the evidence of broadband availability using the Form 477-defined speed breakpoints of 3 mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 2 Figure 1(a) illustrates how the connections reported for June 2011 were distributed across the three ranges of downstream speed defined by breakpoints at 3 mbps and at 6 mbps. Figure 1(a) Distribution of Reportable Connections (206,124,000) by Downstream Speed as of June 30, 2011 29% 10% 61% Downstream Speed ? 6 mbps (60,452,000 connections) 3 mbps ? Downstream Speed < 6 mbps (20,338,000 connections) Downstream Speed < 3 mbps (125,334,000 connections) • In June 2011, 61% of total reportable connections (or 125.3 million connections) were slower than 3 mbps in the downstream direction, 10% (or 20.3 million connections) were at least 3 mbps in the downstream direction but slower than 6 mbps, and 29% (or 60.5 million connections) were at least 6 mbps in the downstream direction.6 • For fixed connections, 27% of reportable connections (or 23.2 million connections) were slower than 3 mbps in the downstream direction, 16% (or 13.8 million connections) were at least 3 mbps in the downstream direction but slower than 6 mbps, and 57% (or 49.6 million connections) were at least 6 mbps in the downstream direction.7 • For mobile connections, 85% of reportable connections (or 102.1 million connections) were slower than 3 mbps in the downstream direction, about 5% (or 6.6 million 6 Our narrative discussion of the speeds of all reportable connections (including both fixed-location connections and mobile wireless subscriptions) is summarized more concisely in Chart 1, at p. 17. 7 See Chart 2, at p. 18. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 3 connections) were at least 3 mbps in the downstream direction but slower than 6 mbps, and 9% (or 10.9 million connections) were at least 6 mbps in the downstream direction.8 Figure 1(b) illustrates how the connections reported for June 2011 were distributed across the three ranges of upstream speed defined by breakpoints at 768 kbps and at 1.5 mbps. Figure 1(b) Distribution of Reportable Connections (206,124,000) by Upstream Speed as of June 30, 2011 18% 57% 26% Upstream Speed ? 1.5 mbps (36,281,000 connections) 768 kbps ? Upstream Speed < 1.5 mbps (52,882,000 connections) Upstream Speed < 768 kbps (116,961,000 connections) • In June 2011, 57% of total reportable connections (or 117.0 million connections) were slower than 768 kbps in the upstream direction, 26% (or 52.9 million connections) were at least 768 kbps in the upstream direction but slower than 1.5 mbps, and 18% (or 36.3 million connections) were at least 1.5 mbps in the upstream direction. • For fixed connections, 39% of reportable connections (or 33.7 million connections) were slower than 768 kbps in the upstream direction, 26% (or 22.3 million connections) were at least 768 kbps in the upstream direction but slower than 1.5 mbps, and 35% (or 30.6 million connections) were at least 1.5 mbps in the upstream direction.9 8 See Chart 5, at p. 21. 9 See Chart 2, at p. 18. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 4 • For mobile connections, 70% of reportable connections (or 83.2 million connections) were slower than 768 kbps in the upstream direction, about 26% (or 30.6 million connections) were at least 768 kbps in the upstream direction but slower than 1.5 mbps, and 5% (or 5.7 million connections) were at least 1.5 mbps in the upstream direction.10 In Figures 2(a) – 2(c), we sequentially review the upstream speeds of the total (including both fixed and mobile) connections that fall into each of the three downstream-speed groupings that we illustrated in Figure 1(a). Figure 2(a) Distribution by Upstream Speed of Reportable Connections (125,334,000) with Downstream Speed Below 3 mbps as of June 30, 2011 10% 29% 0.5% 10.8% 49.5% 61% Downstream Speed < 3 mbps -- Upstream Speed ? 1.5 mbps (962,000 connections) Downstream Speed < 3 mbps -- 768 ? Upstream Speed <1.5 mbps (22,352,000 connections) Downstream Speed < 3 mbps -- Upstream Speed < 768 kbps (102,020,000 connections) • In June 2011, about 49% of reportable connections (or 102.0 million connections) were slower than 3 mbps in the downstream direction and also slower than 768 kbps in the upstream direction. • Additionally, about 11% of reportable connections (or 23.3 million connections) were fast enough in the upstream direction (at least 768 kbps) but too slow in the downstream direction (less than 3 mbps) to meet the broadband availability benchmark adopted in the Sixth Broadband Deployment Report. 10 See Chart 5, at p. 21. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 5 Figure 2(b) Distribution by Upstream Speed of Reportable Connections (20,338,000) with Downstream Speed at Least 3 mbps but Below 6 mbps as of June 30, 2011 29% 10% 61% 3.9% 5.3% 0.7% 3 mbps ? Downstream Speed < 6 mbps -- Upstream Speed ? 1.5 mbps (1,404,000 connections) 3 mbps ? Downstream Speed < 6 mbps -- 768 ? Upstream Speed < 1.5 mbps (10,997,000 connections) 3 mbps ? Downstream Speed < 6 mbps -- Upstream Speed < 768 kbps (7,937,000 connections) • In June 2011, about 4% of reportable connections (or 7.9 million connections) were at least 3 mbps but below 6 mbps in the downstream direction and were slower than 768 kbps in the upstream direction. These purchased connections are too slow in the upstream direction to meet the broadband availability benchmark adopted in the Sixth Broadband Deployment Report. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 6 Figure 2(c) Distribution by Upstream Speed of Reportable Connections (60,452,000) with Downstream Speed at Least 6 mbps as of June 30, 2011 10% 3.4% 9.5% 16.5% 61% 29% Downstream Speed ? 6 mbps -- Upstream Speed ? 1.5 mbps (33,915,000 connections) Downstream Speed ? 6 mbps -- 768 ? Upstream Speed < 1.5 mbps (19,533,000 connections) Downstream Speed ? 6 mbps -- Upstream Speed < 768 kbps (7,004,000 connections) • In June 2011, about 3% of reportable connections (or 7.0 million connections) were at least 6 mbps in the downstream direction and were slower than 768 kbps in the upstream direction. These purchased connections also are too slow in the upstream direction to meet the broadband availability benchmark adopted in the Sixth Broadband Deployment Report. • In sum, 68% of reportable Internet access service connections (or 140.3 million connections) in June 2011 were too slow in both the downstream and upstream directions, or too slow in a single direction, to meet the broadband availability benchmark adopted in the Sixth Broadband Deployment Report.11 About 49% of reportable connections (or 102.0 million connections) were too slow in both directions, about 11% (or 23.3 million connections) were too slow in the downstream direction only, and about 7% (or 14.9 million connections) were too slow in the upstream direction only. 11 Of the 140.3 million connections that failed to meet the benchmark, 38.0 million were fixed connections and 102.3 million were mobile wireless subscriptions. Compare Tables 1 and 2, at p. 16. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 7 Providers by census tract by connection speed . In earlier reports in which we summarized Form 477 data through June 2008, we included summary statistics for the percentage of 5-digit geographical ZIP Codes in which differing numbers of providers (zero providers, one provider, two providers, etc.) had customers for their reportable connections.12 The ZIP Code-based data did not include information about the speeds of the connections that were purchased in particular ZIP Codes. However, the census tract- level information collected on Form 477 since December 2008 does include the speeds of purchased fixed-location connections.13 In Figure 3(a), we use that information to estimate the percentages of households located in census tracts where zero, one, two, or three or more providers reported residential fixed-location connections of several different speeds in June 2011.14 Figure 3(a) Percentages of Households Located in Census Tracts Where Providers Report Residential Fixed-Location Connections of Various Speeds as of June 30, 2011 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 3+ Providers 48 34 4 3 2 Providers 45 50 29 28 1 Provider 6 14 55 55 0 Providers 0 2 13 14 At least 3 mbps downstream & over 200 kbps upstream At least 3 mbps downstream & 768 kbps upstream At least 6 mbps downstream & 1.5 mbps upstream At least 10 mbps downstream & 1.5 mbps upstream Figures may not sum to 100% due to rounding. 12 For the most recent such report, see High-Speed Services for Internet Access: Status as of June 30, 2008 (July 2009) (June 2008 High-Speed Report) at pp. 1-4, available at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html. 13 Mobile wireless providers report the number of service subscriptions they have sold, and the speeds of those service subscriptions, at the state level only. For individual census tracts, they report the speeds of mobile wireless service subscriptions that they offer for sale – that is, the capability of the network that they operate in the census tract. 14 A provider who reports residential connections of a particular speed in a particular census tract may or may not offer service of that speed everywhere in the census tract. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 8 In Figure 3(b), we estimate the percentages of households in census tracts where providers reported residential fixed-location connections of different speeds or operated a mobile wireless network capable of sending or receiving data at the indicated speeds. Figure 3(b) Percentages of Households Located in Census Tracts Where Providers Report Residential Fixed-Location Connections of Vari ous Speeds or Operate a Mobile Wireless Network Capable of Delivering Service of Va rious Speeds as of June 30, 2011 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 3+ Providers 84 77 51 3 2 Providers 13 15 18 28 1 Provider 3 7 22 55 0 Providers 0 1 9 14 At least 3 mbps downstream & over 200 kbps upstream At least 3 mbps downstream & 768 kbps upstream At least 6 mbps downstream & 1.5 mbps upstream At least 10 mbps downstream & 1.5 mbps upstream Figures may not sum to 100% due to rounding. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 9 Internet access adoption . The Commission has systematically collected, compiled, and published data about the adoption of fixed-location Internet access connections faster than 200 kbps in at least one direction for more than a decade. Figure 4 illustrates the adoption of fixed-location Internet access connections (that is, all reportable connections except mobile wireless connections) since 1999.15 Figure 4 Fixed-Location Connections 1999-2011 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 De c 1 99 9 Ju n 2 00 0 De c 2 00 0 Ju n 2 00 1 De c 2 00 1 Ju n 2 00 2 De c 2 00 2 Ju n 2 00 3 De c 2 00 3 Ju n 2 00 4 De c 2 00 4 Ju n 2 00 5 De c 2 00 5 Ju n 2 00 6 De c 2 00 6 Ju n 2 00 7 De c 2 00 7 Ju n 2 00 8 De c 2 00 8 Ju n 2 00 9 De c 2 00 9 Ju n 2 01 0 De c 2 01 0 Ju n 2 01 1 Con ne ct io ns in Tho us an ds 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Con ne ct io ns pe r 10 0 Uni ts Residential Fixed Connections (left axis) Total Fixed Connections (left axis) Residential Fixed Connections per 100 Households (right axis) Total Fixed Connections per 100 Population (right axis) • Between June 2001 and June 2011, total (business and residential) reportable fixed-location connections grew from 9 million connections to nearly 87 million connections – at a compound annual growth rate of 25% per year. • Over the same ten-year period, residential fixed-location connections grew from nearly 8 million connections to 79 million connections – at a compound annual growth rate of 26% per year. • Between June 2001 and June 2011, household adoption – which we track in Figure 4 by comparing the number of residential fixed-location connections to the number of households – increased from 7 connections per 100 households to 65 connections per 100 households.16,17 15 Historical data not in this report may be found in June 2008 High-Speed Report at Tables 1 and 3, available in Excel format at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html. 16 We also show total (including business as well as residential) fixed-location connections per 100 population in Figure 4, which is a statistic routinely reported by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). This ratio incorporates connections to business locations into a comparison to persons. A more accurately measured indicator of this type would include only connections to residential locations, but OECD does not have U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 10 Other report highlights . Residential subscribership • Residential fixed-location Internet access connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction increased by 5% between June 2010 and June 2011, to 79 million. See Table 3. • Reported residential mobile wireless service subscribers with mobile devices and data plans for full Internet access increased by 62%, to nearly 93 million, between June 2010 and June 2011. See Table 3. • The reported data show a 25% increase between June 2010 and June 2011 in the number of residential fixed-location connections that are at least 6 mbps downstream and 1.5 mbps upstream (from 22.3 million to 27.9 million) and a 24% increase in the number of connections that are at least 10 mbps downstream and 1.5 mbps upstream (from 21.8 million to 27.1 million). See Chart 12. Household adoption by speed tier • As a national average in June 2011, there were 38 residential fixed-location connections per 100 households for connections with speeds that were reported to be at least 3 mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream. That was slightly more than half as large as the ratio of 67 residential fixed- location connections of any reportable speed per 100 households.18 See Tables 15 and 16. comprehensive, consistent information about residential connections in the member countries. (We note that the ratio of accurately measured residential fixed-location connections to population has a maximum value for any given country and point in time – the value when every household is connected – if we assume that no household would have more than one fixed connection to its premises. For the United States in June 2011, for example, the maximum value would be 38 because there were about 120.8 million households in the United States and inhabited insular areas and a population of about 315.7 million.) 17 For consistency of presentation, we include only mid-year ratios in Figure 4. We calculated total fixed connections per 100 population using U.S. Census Bureau population estimates for the United States and Puerto Rico – which are as of July 1 each year – and Census 2000 population for the remaining inhabited insular areas. We calculated residential fixed connections per 100 households using U.S. household estimates from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey (CPS) for July of each year, Census 2010 households for Puerto Rico, and Census 2000 households for the remaining inhabited insular areas. (The CPS also estimates U.S. households for March and November of each year.) 18 Increases over time in the ratio of residential fixed-location connections to households indicate that increasing shares of households are connected at home. The ratio is somewhat different from the “take rate” of offered service because, as discussed in connection with Figure 3(a), some households are located in areas where apparently no fixed-location service is offered (as none is purchased). U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 11 Census tract and county shares of households with reportable connections • We estimate the share of households with fixed-location Internet access connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction in individual census tracts and counties as of June 30, 2011. Our estimates continue to indicate that there are substantial areas of relatively low and relatively high household adoption around the national average. See Charts 15 and 16. • For both census tracts and counties, we continue to find estimates above 100% for the share of households with reportable fixed-location Internet access connections. These results suggest that some filers are not accurately assigning customer connections to census tracts, and anecdotal evidence supports that conclusion.19 Household adoption rates and subscribership demographics • The report includes charts that illustrate correlations between household subscribership, or adoption, rates and demographic measures. We update charts based on income, household density, education, age, and race. The data indicate that some demographic variables are correlated with the adoption of Internet access service. See Charts 17-29. Maps of providers by census tract • Maps depict the number of providers of reportable connections by census tract. These maps are similar to previously published maps of providers by ZIP Code, but differ in important respects. In particular, instead of a single map combining providers of connections over all technologies and to both residential and business end users, now separate maps depict: (1) providers of total (combined residential and business) reportable fixed-location connections, (2) providers of residential reportable fixed-location connections, (3) providers of residential fixed-location connections at least 3 mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream, and (4) providers making reportable mobile wireless service available.20 Remainder of the report . The remainder of the report consists of tables, charts, and maps that highlight different aspects of Internet access service subscriptions. This information is organized into four sections, as described below. As always, publicly accessible data that are too voluminous to include in this report are available online at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html. • Detailed Summary Statistics: The Nation. Tables 1-14 and Charts 1-14 focus in order on: number of connections, speed of connections, technology of connections, and number of providers. • Detailed Summary Statistics: The States. Tables 15-24 present comparable information for the individual states and our estimates of the shares of households that are connected at different speeds. 19 For example, while contacting Form 477 filers with questions about reported data, FCC staff continue to find situations in which all connections reported for a county have been assigned to a single, anomalous census tract. 20 As discussed in the Technical Notes, a mobile wireless provider should only report service availability in census tracts where the provider operates a network capable of sending or receiving data at speeds above 200 kbps. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 12 • Detailed Summary Statistics: Counties and Census Tracts. Charts 15-16 and Tables 25-29 present information about differences among counties and census tracts. This section concludes with two maps that illustrate differences among census tracts in the estimated share of connected households and the four maps (discussed above) that illustrate providers by census tract. • Detailed Correlation Results: Demographic Measures. Charts 17-29 present details of the correlations observed between the estimated share of connected households and demographic measures. * * * * We invite users of this information to suggest improvements in the data analysis by using the attached customer response form or sending comments to IATDreports@fcc.gov for subject: June 2011 Internet services data, and to participate in proceedings the Commission undertakes to improve the data collection. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 13 Detailed Summary Statistics: The Nation Contents of this section Number of connections Table 1 Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2007-2011....................................16 Table 2 Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream 2008-2011 ..............16 Table 3 Residential Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2007-2011.................16 Table 4 Residential Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream 2008-2011 .........................................................................................................16 Speed of connections Chart 1 Distribution of Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of June 30, 2011.....................................................................................................................17 Chart 2 Distribution of Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of June 30, 2011 ............................................................................................................18 Chart 3 Distribution of Residential Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of June 30, 2011 ............................................................................................................19 Chart 4 Distribution of Residential Fixed C onnections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of June 30, 2011............................................................................................20 Chart 5 Distribution of Mobile Wireless Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of June 30, 2011............................................................................................21 Table 5 Connections and Percentage Residential by Speed Tier as of June 30, 2011....................22 Table 6 Fixed Connections and Percentage Residential by Speed Tier as of June 30, 2011.....................................................................................................................23 Technology of connections Table 7 Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology 2007-2011...........24 Chart 6 Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2011 ..............................................................24 Table 8 Residential Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology 2007-2011..........................................................................................................................25 Chart 7 Residential Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2011 ...........................................25 Connections by speed and technology Table 9 Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Technology 2008-2011.................................................................................................26 Chart 8 Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Technology as of June 30, 2011 ...................................................................................26 Table 10 Residential Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Technology 2008-2011.................................................................................................27 Chart 9 Residential Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Technology as of June 30, 2011 ...................................................................................27 Chart 10 Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2006-2011 (Shares of selected technologies) ......................................................................................28 Chart 11 Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2007-2011 (Net adds for selected technologies)..................................................................................28 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 14 Chart 12 Residential Fixed Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2011 (Shares of selected technologies for selected speeds) .......................................................29 Table 11 Residential Connections by Technology and Speed (BTOP/BIP Definition) as of June 30, 2011 ............................................................................................................30 Chart 13 Residential Connections (BTOP/BIP Definition) by Technology as of June 30, 2011 ............................................................................................................30 Table 12 Connections by Speed Tier and Technology as of June 30, 2011.....................................31 Table 13 Residential Connections by Speed Tier and Technology as of June 30, 2011 ..................32 Number of providers Table 14 Nationwide Number of Provi ders of Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology 2007-2011 .......................................................33 Chart 14 Nationwide Number of Providers of Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction, Selected Technologies 2007-2011 ..........................................33 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 15 1 Table 1 Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2007-2011 (In thousands) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Technology Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 100,986 121,222 132,814 102,239 119,433 136,293 157,017 182,065 206,124 Total Fixe d 65,681 70,206 73,123 75,707 77,997 79,994 81,764 84,521 86,568 Mobil e Wirel e s s 1 35,305 51,016 59,691 26,532 41,436 56,300 75,253 97,544 119,556 Table 2 Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream 2008-2011 (In thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 Technology Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 31,120 33,332 40,669 45,554 55,113 65,849 Total Fixe d 30,987 33,108 38,963 41,366 44,696 48,576 Mobil e Wirel e s s 1 133 224 1,706 4,188 10,416 17,272 Table 3 Residential Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2007-2011 (In thousands) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Technology Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 66,173 73,984 79,090 88,190 103,300 117,088 132,567 149,441 171,767 Total Fixe d 60,628 64,875 67,554 69,047 71,509 73,394 75,251 76,918 78,900 Mobil e Wirel e s s 1 5,545 9,109 11,536 19,142 31,791 43,695 57,316 72,523 92,867 Table 4 Residential Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream 2008-2011 (In thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 Technology Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 29,127 31,356 38,426 42,245 47,634 52,693 Total Fixe d 29,013 31,161 36,844 39,039 41,772 45,263 Mobil e Wirel e s s 1 114 196 1,582 3,206 5,863 7,429 1 Reporting instructions for mobile wireless changed between the June 2008 and Decembe r 2008 data. See Technic a l Notes at the e nd of the report. Note: Some histori c a l data have been revise d . Figure s may not sum to totals due to roundi n g . Sourc e: FCC Form 477, Parts I and VI. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 16 2 Chart 1 Distribution of Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of June 30, 2011 No te : I nne r c irc le (lig ht s had ing ) re p re s e nts up s tre am s p e e d s . D o wns tre am S p e e d < 3 mb p s ; 6 0 .8 % >= 3 mb p s & < 6 mb p s ; 9 .9 % >= 6 mb p s ; 2 9 .3 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 4 9 .5 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 mb p s 1 0 .8 % >= 1 .5 mb p s 0 .5 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 mb p s 5 .3 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 3 .9 % >= 1 .5 mb p s 0 .7 % >= 1 .5 mb p s 1 6 .5 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 mb p s 9 .5 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 3 .4 % C o n n e c t i o n s over 200 kbps in at Least One Dir ect i o n (in thousa n d s ) Downstream Speed Upstream Speed Less than 3 mbps At least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps At least 6 mbps Total L e ss than 768 kbps 102, 02 0 7 , 93 7 7 , 00 4 116, 96 1 At leas t 768 kbp s & Less than 1.5 mbp s 22,3 52 1 0 ,9 97 1 9 ,5 33 52,8 82 At leas t 1.5 mbps 962 1 , 40 4 3 3 ,9 15 36,2 81 T o t a l 125, 33 4 2 0 ,3 38 6 0 ,4 52 206, 12 4 Perce n t a g e s Less than 768 kbps 49.5 3 . 9 3 . 4 56.7 At leas t 768 kbp s & Less than 1.5 mbp s 10.8 5 . 3 9 . 5 25.7 At leas t 1.5 mbps 0.5 0 . 7 1 6 .5 17.6 To t a l 60.8 9 . 9 2 9 .3 100. 0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 17 3 Chart 2 Distribution of Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of June 30, 2011 No te : I nne r c irc le (lig ht s had ing ) re p re s e nts up s tre am s p e e d s . D o wns tre am S p e e d < 3 mb p s ; 2 6 .8 % >= 3 mb p s & < 6 mb p s ; 1 5 .9 % >= 6 mb p s ; 5 7 .2 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 2 1 .9 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 m b p s 4 .2 % >= 1 .5 m b p s 0 .7 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 9 .0 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 m b p s 6 .5 % >= 1 .5 m b p s 0 .4 % >= 1 .5 mb p s 3 4 .2 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 mb p s 1 5 .0 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 8 .1 % F i x e d Connec t i o n s over 200 kbps in at Least One Di rect i o n (in thou sa n d s ) Downstream Speed Upstream Speed Less than 3 mbps At least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps At least 6 mbps Total L e ss than 768 kbps 18,9 69 7 , 77 1 6 , 99 0 33,7 30 At leas t 768 kbp s & Less than 1.5 mbp s 3,66 7 5 , 65 2 1 2 ,9 55 22,2 73 At leas t 1.5 mbps 595 3 6 1 2 9 ,6 09 30,5 65 T o t a l 23,2 31 1 3 ,7 84 4 9 ,5 54 86,5 68 Perce n t a g e s Less than 768 kbps 21.9 9 . 0 8 . 1 39.0 At leas t 768 kbp s & Less than 1.5 mbp s 4.2 6 . 5 1 5 .0 25.7 At leas t 1.5 mbps 0.7 0 . 4 3 4 .2 35.3 To t a l 26.8 1 5 .9 5 7 .2 100. 0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 18 4 Chart 3 Distribution of Residential Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of June 30, 2011 No te : I nne r c irc le (lig ht s had ing ) re p re s e nts up s tre am s p e e d s . D o wns tre am S p e e d < 3 mb p s ; 6 1 .4 % >= 3 mb p s & < 6 mb p s ; 8 .5 % >= 6 mb p s ; 3 0 .1 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 5 1 .0 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 mb p s 1 0 .1 % >= 1 .5 mb p s 0 .3 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 3 .9 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 mb p s 3 .9 % >= 1 .5 mb p s 0 .7 % >= 1 .5 mb p s 1 8 .4 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 m b p s 7 .7 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 4 .0 % R e s i d e n t i a l Conne c t i o n s over 200 kbps in at Least One Dir ect i o n (in thousa n d s ) Downstream Speed Upstream Speed Less than 3 mbps At least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps At least 6 mbps Total L e ss than 768 kbps 87,5 97 6 , 76 7 6 , 88 0 101, 24 4 At leas t 768 kbp s & Less than 1.5 mbp s 17,3 96 6 , 66 6 1 3 ,2 52 37,3 13 At leas t 1.5 mbps 434 1 , 13 2 3 1 ,6 43 33,2 10 T o t a l 105, 42 7 1 4 ,5 65 5 1 ,7 75 171, 76 7 Perce n t a g e s Less than 768 kbps 51.0 3 . 9 4 . 0 58.9 At leas t 768 kbp s & Less than 1.5 mbp s 10.1 3 . 9 7 . 7 21.7 At leas t 1.5 mbps 0.3 0 . 7 1 8 .4 19.3 To t a l 61.4 8 . 5 3 0 .1 100. 0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Parts I and VI. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 19 5 Chart 4 Distribution of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of June 30, 2011 No te : I nne r c irc le (lig ht s had ing ) re p re s e nts up s tre am s p e e d s . D o wns tre am S p e e d < 3 mb p s ; 2 5 .6 % >= 3 mb p s & < 6 mb p s ; 1 4 .8 % >= 6 mb p s ; 5 9 .6 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 2 1 .2 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 m b p s 4 .2 % >= 1 .5 m b p s 0 .1 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 8 .4 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 m b p s 6 .2 % >= 1 .5 m b p s 0 .3 % >= 1 .5 m b p s 3 5 .4 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 mb p s 1 5 .6 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 8 .7 % R e s i d e n t i a l Fixed Conne c t i o n s over 200 kbps in at Least One Direct i o n (in thousa n d s ) Downstream Speed Upstream Speed Less than 3 mbps At least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps At least 6 mbps Total L e ss than 768 kbps 16,7 60 6 , 61 1 6 , 86 6 30,2 36 At leas t 768 kbp s & Less than 1.5 mbp s 3,31 6 4 , 86 1 1 2 ,2 96 20,4 73 At leas t 1.5 mbps 85 2 1 1 2 7 ,8 95 28,1 91 T o t a l 20,1 60 1 1 ,6 83 4 7 ,0 57 78,9 00 Perce n t a g e s Less than 768 kbps 21.2 8 . 4 8 . 7 38.3 At leas t 768 kbp s & Less than 1.5 mbp s 4.2 6 . 2 1 5 .6 25.9 At leas t 1.5 mbps 0.1 0 . 3 3 5 .4 35.7 To t a l 25.6 1 4 .8 5 9 .6 100. 0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part VI. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 20 6 Chart 5 Distribution of Mobile Wireless Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of June 30, 2011 No te : I nne r c irc le (lig ht s had ing ) re p re s e nts up s tre am s p e e d s . D o wns tre am S p e e d < 3 mb p s ; 8 5 .4 % >= 3 mb p s & < 6 mb p s ; 5 .5 % >= 6 mb p s ; 9 .1 % < 7 6 8 kb p s 6 9 .5 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 mb p s 1 5 .6 % >= 1 .5 mb p s 0 .3 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 mb p s 4 .5 % >= 1 .5 mb p s 0 .9 % >= 7 6 8 kb p s & < 1 .5 mb p s 5 .5 % >= 1 .5 mb p s 3 .6 % M o b i l e Wirel e s s Conne c t i o n s over 200 kbps in at Least One Dir ect i o n (in thousa n d s ) Downstream Speed Upstream Speed Less than 3 mbps At least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps At least 6 mbps Total L e ss than 768 kbps 83,0 51 1 6 6 1 5 83,2 31 At leas t 768 kbp s & Less than 1.5 mbp s 18,6 86 5 , 34 5 6 , 57 8 30,6 09 At leas t 1.5 mbps 366 1 , 04 3 4 , 30 6 5,71 5 T o t a l 102, 10 3 6 , 55 4 1 0 ,8 99 119, 55 6 Perce n t a g e s Less than 768 kbps 69.5 0 . 1 0 . 0 69.6 At leas t 768 kbp s & Less than 1.5 mbp s 15.6 4 . 5 5 . 5 25.6 At leas t 1.5 mbps 0.3 0 . 9 3 . 6 4.8 To t a l 85.4 5 . 5 9 . 1 100. 0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 21 7 Table 5 Connections and Percentage Residential by Speed Tier as of June 30, 2011 (In thousands) Downstream Speed Upstream Speed Customer Class Greater than 200 kbps and less than 768 kbps At least 768 kbps and less than 1.5 mbps At least 1.5 mbps and less than 3 mbps At least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps At least 6 mbps and less than 10 mbps At least 10 mbps and less than 25 mbps At least 25 mbps and less than 100 mbps At least 100 mbps Total L e ss than or equ al to 200 kbp s Tota l Conn ec t io ns 10,6 04 2 , 81 7 7 , 77 7 6 6 2 3 0 0 2 1 ,2 68 % Residential 85 96 59 93 98 100 0 0 77 Gr e a te r tha n 200 kbps and less than 768 kbp s Tota l Conn ec t io ns 31,7 16 2 6 ,1 45 2 2 ,9 61 7 , 87 1 5 , 63 9 1 , 36 1 # 0 9 5 ,6 94 % Residential 86 90 89 85 98 99 90 0 89 At leas t 768 and les s tha n 1.5 mbps Tota l Conn ec t io ns # 9, 75 3 * 1 0 ,9 97 1 0 ,6 93 8 , 83 4 6 * 5 2 ,8 82 % Residential 93 86 71 61 43 98 90 0 71 At leas t 1.5 mbp s and les s tha n 3 mbps Tota l Conn ec t io ns * * 9 5 5 1 , 20 3 3 , 39 5 2 0 ,8 59 2 1 1 * 2 6 ,6 30 % Residential 100 76 45 88 94 95 99 27 93 At leas t 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps Tota l Conn ec t io ns * * * 2 0 1 1 , 68 6 3 , 86 0 1 , 25 1 1 6 , 99 9 % Residential 100 0 0 39 75 96 91 22 88 At leas t 6 mbps and less than 10 mbp s Tota l Conn ec t io ns 0 0 0 * 6 0 * 4 4 0 1 0 6 % Residential 0 0 0 100 55 67 99 0 73 At leas t 10 mbps and less tha n 25 mbps Tota l Conn ec t io ns * 0 0 * 0 1 , 59 3 1 5 9 9 1 , 76 1 % Residential 100 0 0 0 0 91 78 19 89 At leas t 25 mbps and les s tha n 100 mbp s Tota l Conn ec t io ns 0 0 0 * 0 0 7 1 6 * 7 1 6 % Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 13 89 At leas t 100 mbp s Tota l Conn ec t io ns 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 * 6 8 % Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 Total Tota l Conn ec t io ns 42,3 27 3 8 ,7 16 4 4 ,2 91 2 0 ,3 38 2 1 ,4 75 3 6 ,5 12 2 , 38 7 7 9 2 0 6, 12 4 % Residential 86 90 78 72 68 96 90 16 83 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withhel d to maintai n firm confide n t i a l it y. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Parts I and VI. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 22 8 Table 6 Fixed Connections and Percentage Residential by Speed Tier as of June 30, 2011 (In thousands) Downstream Speed Upstream Speed Customer Class Greater than 200 kbps and less than 768 kbps At least 768 kbps and less than 1.5 mbps At least 1.5 mbps and less than 3 mbps At least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps At least 6 mbps and less than 10 mbps At least 10 mbps and less than 25 mbps At least 25 mbps and less than 100 mbps At least 100 mbps Total L e ss than or equ al to 200 kbp s Tota l Conn ec t io ns 1,37 9 2 , 01 0 1 3 9 6 6 2 3 0 0 3 , 59 8 % Residential 84 96 45 93 98 100 0 0 89 Gr e a te r tha n 200 kbps and less than 768 kbp s Tota l Conn ec t io ns 1,75 2 5 , 34 2 8 , 34 7 * * * # 0 3 0 ,1 31 % Residential 87 91 86 85 98 99 90 0 90 At leas t 768 and les s tha n 1.5 mbps Tota l Conn ec t io ns # 55 5 3 , 11 1 5 , 65 2 * 8 , 83 4 6 * 2 2 ,2 73 % Residential 93 75 93 86 88 98 90 0 92 At leas t 1.5 mbp s and les s tha n 3 mbps Tota l Conn ec t io ns * * 5 8 9 1 6 1 * * 2 1 1 * 2 2 ,5 62 % Residential 100 76 13 83 94 95 99 27 93 At leas t 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps Tota l Conn ec t io ns * * * 2 0 0 * 3 , 86 0 1 , 25 1 1 5 , 35 1 % Residential 100 0 0 39 64 96 91 22 92 At leas t 6 mbps and less than 10 mbp s Tota l Conn ec t io ns 0 0 0 * * 2 4 4 0 * % Residential 0 0 0 100 55 67 99 0 73 At leas t 10 mbps and less tha n 25 mbps Tota l Conn ec t io ns * 0 0 * 0 1 , 59 3 1 5 9 9 1 , 76 1 % Residential 100 0 0 0 0 91 78 19 89 At leas t 25 mbps and les s tha n 100 mbp s Tota l Conn ec t io ns 0 0 0 * 0 0 7 1 6 * 7 1 6 % Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 13 89 At leas t 100 mbp s Tota l Conn ec t io ns 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 * * % Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 Total Tota l Conn ec t io ns 3,13 8 7 , 90 8 * 1 3 ,7 84 1 0 ,5 90 * 2 , 38 7 7 9 8 6 ,5 68 % Residential 86 91 84 85 94 96 90 16 91 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withhel d to maintai n firm confide n t i a l it y. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Parts I and VI. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 23 9 Table 7 Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology 2007-2011 (In thousands) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Technology Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 100,986 121,222 132,814 102,239 119,433 136,293 157,017 182,065 206,124 Total Fixe d 65,681 70,206 73,123 75,707 77,997 79,994 81,764 84,521 86,568 aDSL 27,793 29,449 29,964 30,198 30,631 30,987 30,759 31,470 31,610 sDSL 320 293 275 241 217 225 191 167 159 Othe r Wireli n e 622 605 665 705 684 714 750 788 772 Cable Modem 34,404 36,507 38,190 40,251 41,434 42,438 43,923 45,334 46,698 FTTP 1 1,281 1,849 2,346 2,884 3,548 3,980 4,441 4,993 5,476 Satell i t e 669 791 869 938 990 1,116 1,144 1,176 1,204 Fixed Wirele s s 587 707 808 485 488 527 551 587 644 Power Line and Othe r 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 Mobil e Wirel e s s 2 35,305 51,016 59,691 26,532 41,436 56,300 75,253 97,544 119,556 1 Fiber to the premis es. See Technical No tes at the end of the report for a descri p t i on of Form 477 technol ogy categor i es and other reporti n g require m e n t s . 2 Reporting instructions for mobile wireless changed between the June 2008 and Decembe r 2008 data. See Technic a l Notes at the e nd of the report. Note: Some histori c a l data have been revise d . Figure s may not sum to totals due to roundi n g . Sourc e: FCC Form 477, Part I. Chart 6 Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2011 aD S L 1 5 .3 % F T T P 2 .7 % C ab le Mo d e m 2 2 .7 % Mo b ile W ire le s s 5 8 .0 % A ll O the r 1 .4 % U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 24 10 Table 8 Residential Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology 2007-2011 (In thousands) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Technology Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 66,173 73,984 79,090 88,190 103,300 117,088 132,567 149,441 171,767 Total Fixe d 60,628 64,875 67,554 69,047 71,509 73,394 75,251 76,918 78,900 aDSL 24,962 26,475 26,950 26,488 27,047 27,402 27,488 27,467 27,753 sDSL 105 82 81 74 71 85 65 53 52 Othe r Wireli n e 12 17 32 42 44 51 56 70 39 Cable Modem 33,336 35,341 36,901 38,681 39,909 40,872 42,178 43,295 44,480 FTTP 1 1,153 1,683 2,139 2,717 3,348 3,758 4,185 4,704 5,118 Satell i t e 530 626 705 630 668 767 787 811 885 Fixed Wirele s s 523 644 741 410 417 454 486 513 567 Power Line and Othe r 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 Mobil e Wirel e s s 2 5,545 9,109 11,536 19,142 31,791 43,695 57,316 72,523 92,867 1 Fiber to the premis es. See Technical No tes at the end of the report for a descri p t i on of Form 477 technol ogy categor i es and other reporti n g require m e n t s . 2 Reporting instructions for mobile wireless changed between the June 2008 and Decembe r 2008 data. See Technic a l Notes at the e nd of the report. Note: Some histori c a l data have been revise d . Figure s may not sum to totals due to roundi n g . Sourc e: FCC Form 477, Parts I and VI. Chart 7 Residential Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2011 aD S L 1 6 .2 % F T T P 3 .0 % C ab le Mo d e m 2 5 .9 % Mo b ile W ire le s s 5 4 .1 % A ll O the r 0 .9 % U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 25 11 Table 9 Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Technology 2008-2011 (In thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 Technology Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 31,120 33,332 40,669 45,554 55,113 65,849 Total Fixe d 30,987 33,108 38,963 41,366 44,696 48,576 aDSL 5,403 5,614 6,389 6,277 7,305 8,909 sDSL 5 9 19 13 14 16 Othe r Wireli n e 121 128 149 176 208 202 Cable Modem 22,708 23,958 28,583 30,616 32,338 34,114 FTTP 1 2,694 3,333 3,739 4,192 4,725 5,188 Satell i t e # # # # # # Fixed Wirele s s 54 64 82 92 105 145 Power Line and Othe r 1 1 1 1 3 3 Mobil e Wirel e s s 2 133 224 1,706 4,188 10,416 17,272 # = Rounds to Zero. 1 Fiber to the premis es. See Technical No tes at the end of the report for a descri p t i on of Form 477 technol ogy categor i es and other reporti n g require m e n t s . 2 Reporting instructions for mobile wireless changed between the June 2008 and Decembe r 2008 data. See Technic a l Notes at the e nd of the report. Note: Some histori c a l data have been revise d . Figure s may not sum to totals due to roundi n g . Sourc e: FCC Form 477, Part I. Chart 8 Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Technology as of June 30, 2011 aD S L 1 3 .5 % F T T P 7 .9 % C ab le Mo d e m 5 1 .8 % Mo b ile W ire le s s 2 6 .2 % A ll O the r 0 .6 % U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 26 12 Table 10 Residential Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Technology 2008-2011 (In thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 Technology Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 29,127 31,356 38,426 42,245 47,634 52,693 Total Fixe d 29,013 31,161 36,844 39,039 41,772 45,263 aDSL 4,613 4,895 5,633 5,559 6,423 7,909 sDSL 1 2 10 2 2 4 Othe r Wireli n e 10 11 18 19 33 13 Cable Modem 21,776 23,025 27,548 29,398 30,742 32,321 FTTP 1 2,571 3,177 3,566 3,982 4,482 4,894 Satell i t e 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fixed Wirele s s 42 50 68 77 86 120 Power Line and Othe r 1 1 1 1 3 3 Mobil e Wirel e s s 2 114 196 1,582 3,206 5,863 7,429 1 Fiber to the premis es. See Technical No tes at the end of the report for a descri p t i on of Form 477 technol ogy categor i es and other reporti n g require m e n t s . 2 Reporting instructions for mobile wireless changed between the June 2008 and Decembe r 2008 data. See Technic a l Notes at the e nd of the report. Note: Some histori c a l data have been revise d . Figure s may not sum to totals due to roundi n g . Sourc e: FCC Form 477, Parts I and VI. Chart 9 Residential Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Technology as of June 30, 2011 aD S L 1 5 .0 % F T T P 9 .3 % C ab le Mo d e m 6 1 .3 % Mo b ile W ire le s s 1 4 .1 % A ll O the r 0 .3 % U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 27 13 Chart 10 Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2006-2011 (Shares of selected technologies) aD S L Cable M o dem FT T P A ll Other Fi xed 5 5 . 9 4 0 . 9 5 4 . 5 2 . 6 4 0 . 8 5 6 . 0 3 . 9 3 8 . 4 5 5 . 7 5 . 1 3 7 . 3 5 6 . 3 6 . 1 3 5 . 7 5 5 . 0 4 1 . 2 5 4 . 6 3 . 2 3 9 . 9 5 5 . 8 4 . 7 3 7 . 8 5 6 . 0 5 . 6 3 6 . 5 5 6 . 4 6 . 5 3 5 . 2 P er ce nt ag e of R es id en tia l F ix ed C on ne ct io ns 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0 D e c 2 0 0 6 J un 2 0 0 7 D e c 2 0 0 7 J un 2 0 0 8 D e c 2 0 0 8 J un 2 0 0 9 D e c 2 0 0 9 J un 2 0 1 0 D e c 2 0 1 0 J un 2 0 1 1 C on ne ct io ns in T ho us an ds 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 J un 2 0 0 7 to J un 2 0 0 8 J un 2 0 0 8 to J un 2 0 0 9 J un 2 0 0 9 to J un 2 0 1 0 J un 2 0 1 0 to J un 2 0 1 1 Chart 11 Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2007-2011 (Net adds for selected technologies) aDS L C able M o dem FT T P 1988 97 442 265 3564 3008 2269 2302 986 1209 837 933 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 28 14 Chart 12 Residential Fixed Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2011 (Shares of selected technologies for selected speeds, connections in thousands) aD S L C able M o dem FT T P A ll Other Fixed 3 5 . 2 5 6 . 4 6 . 5 2 . 0 3 3 . 5 5 8 . 7 6 . 9 2 1 . 8 6 9 . 4 8 . 5 1 7 . 5 7 1 . 4 1 0 . 8 8 2 . 7 1 6 . 7 8 2 . 6 1 7 . 0 E s t i m a t e d P e r c e n t a g e o f H o u s e h o l d s 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0 O ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n A t le as t 7 6 8 kb p s d o wns tre am and o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s up s tre am A t le as t 3 mb p s d o wns tre am and o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s up s tre am A t le as t 3 mb p s d o wns tre am and at le as t 7 6 8 kb p s up s tre am A t le as t 6 mb p s d o wns tre am and at le as t 1 .5 mb p s up s tre am A t le as t 1 0 mb p s d o wns tre am and at le as t 1 .5 mb p s up s tre am Co n n e c t i o n s 7 8 , 9 0 0 7 4 , 1 5 1 5 8 , 6 7 5 4 5 , 2 6 3 2 7 , 89 5 27 , 1 3 1 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 29 15 Table 11 Residential Connections by Technology and Speed (BTOP/BIP Definition) as of June 30, 2011 (In thousands) Technology At Most 200 kbps Upstream or less than 768 kbps Downstream Over 200 kbps Upstream and at least 768 kbps Downstream Total aDSL 2,892 2 4 , 8 6 1 2 7 , 7 5 3 sDSL 22 31 5 2 Other Wireli n e 3 36 39 Cable Modem 926 43 , 5 5 4 4 4 , 4 8 0 FTT P 16 5,1 0 3 5 , 1 1 8 Satellite 768 11 8 8 8 5 Fixed Wirele s s 121 44 6 5 6 7 Mobile Wirele s s 38,84 0 5 4 , 0 2 7 9 2 , 8 6 7 Po wer Line an d Other 3 3 6 Total 43,58 9 1 2 8 , 1 7 8 1 7 1 , 7 6 7 # = Rounds to Zero. Note: Figu r e s may not sum to tota ls due to roun d i n g . Source: FCC Form 477, Part s I and VI. Chart 13 Residential Connections (BTOP/BIP Definition) by Technology as of June 30, 2011 S o urc e : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , Parts I and V I . No te : T he BT O P /B I P d e f initio n is ad ve rtis e d s p e e d s o f at le as t 7 6 8 kb p s d o wns tre am and 2 0 0 kb p s up s tre am to e nd us e rs . a DS L 1 9. 4 % FTTP 4 . 0% C a b l e Mod e m 3 4 . 0% M ob i l e W i re l es s 4 2. 1 % A l l Oth er 0 . 5% U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 30 16 Table 12 Connections by Speed Tier and Technology as of June 30, 2011 (In thousands) 200 kbps or less Upstream Over 200 kbps Upstream Technology Download over 200 kbps and less than 768 kbps Download at least 768 kbps Subtotal Download over 200 kbps and less than 768 kbps Download at least 768 kbps and less than 1.5 mbps Download at least 1.5 mbps and less than 3 mbps Download at least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps Download at least 6 mbps and less than 10 mbps Download at least 10 mbps and less than 25 mbps Download at least 25 mbps Subtotal Total a D S L 824 833 1,65 7 1 , 4 8 9 4 , 7 6 7 8 , 9 1 7 1 0 , 1 7 0 3,430 1, 1 0 6 7 4 2 9 , 9 5 3 3 1 , 6 1 0 s D S L 0 0 0 55 53 * 1 2 2 * # 159 1 5 9 O t h e r Wir el i n e 0 0 0 54 76 44 0 1 0 3 21 29 48 7 7 2 7 7 2 C a b l e Modem 88 801 888 5 8 7 7 6 2 , 1 4 8 3 , 0 8 0 6,978 31 , 2 4 4 1 , 5 2 6 4 5 , 8 1 0 4 6 , 6 9 8 FTTP 4 2 6 14 50 13 8 2 1 7 129 4,10 8 8 1 4 5 , 4 7 0 5 , 4 7 6 S a t e l l i t e 429 567 996 * * * * 0 0 0 209 1 , 2 0 4 F i x e d Wirel e s s 35 17 52 82 1 5 0 1 9 1 1 3 0 30 7 2 592 6 4 4 M o b i l e Wirel e s s 9,224 8,445 17 , 6 6 9 2 9 , 9 6 5 3 0 , 0 0 1 * 6 , 5 5 4 10,885 * 0 1 0 1 , 8 8 7 1 1 9 , 5 5 6 Power Line an d Other 0 0 0 * * * * 0 0 0 6 6 Total 10,604 10,664 2 1 , 2 6 8 3 1 , 7 2 3 3 5 , 8 9 9 3 6 , 5 1 4 2 0 , 2 7 2 21,473 3 6 , 5 0 9 2 , 4 6 6 1 8 4 , 8 5 6 2 0 6 , 1 2 4 Perce n t a g e s aDSL 2.6 2.6 5.2 4 . 7 1 5 . 1 2 8 . 2 3 2 . 2 10.9 3.5 0 . 2 9 4 . 8 1 0 0 . 0 s D S L 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 4 . 6 3 3 . 4 * 7 . 6 1.5 * 0.2 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 O t h e r Wir el i n e 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 . 0 9 . 9 5 7 . 0 1 3 . 4 2.7 3.8 6 . 3 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 C a b l e Modem 0.2 1.7 1.9 0 . 1 1 . 7 4 . 6 6 . 6 14.9 66. 9 3 . 3 9 8 . 1 1 0 0 . 0 FTTP 0.1 0.0 0.1 0 . 3 0 . 9 2 . 5 4 . 0 2.3 75.0 1 4 . 9 9 9 . 9 1 0 0 . 0 S a t e l l i t e 35.6 47.1 82. 7 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 1 7 . 3 1 0 0 . 0 F i x e d Wirel e s s 5.4 2.6 8.1 1 2 . 7 2 3 . 3 2 9 . 7 2 0 . 2 4.6 1.0 0 . 4 9 1 . 9 1 0 0 . 0 M o b i l e Wirel e s s 7.7 7.1 14.8 2 5 . 1 2 5 . 1 * 5 . 5 9.1 * 0.0 8 5 . 2 1 0 0 . 0 Power Line an d Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 Total 5.1 5.2 10.3 1 5 . 4 1 7 . 4 1 7 . 7 9 . 8 10.4 17. 7 1 . 2 8 9 . 7 1 0 0 . 0 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withhel d to maintai n firm confide n t i a l it y. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 31 17 Table 13 Residential Connections by Speed Tier and Technology as of June 30, 2011 (In thousands) 200 kbps or less Upstream Over 200 kbps Upstream Technology Download over 200 kbps and less than 768 kbps Download at least 768 kbps Subtotal Download over 200 kbps and less than 768 kbps Download at least 768 kbps and less than 1.5 mbps Download at least 1.5 mbps and less than 3 mbps Download at least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps Download at least 6 mbps and less than 10 mbps Download at least 10 mbps and less than 25 mbps Download at least 25 mbps Subtotal Total a D S L 749 766 1,51 5 1 , 3 7 6 4 , 3 0 8 7 , 7 5 2 8 , 5 7 3 3,158 1, 0 0 2 6 9 2 6 , 2 3 8 2 7 , 7 5 3 s D S L 0 0 0 22 22 * 3 1 * # 52 52 O t h e r Wir el i n e 0 0 0 3 6 18 11 1 # # 39 39 C a b l e Modem 83 799 882 4 4 7 5 4 2 , 0 5 7 2 , 7 2 7 6,616 30 , 0 2 4 1 , 3 7 6 4 3 , 5 9 8 4 4 , 4 8 0 FTTP 4 2 5 10 41 93 1 9 3 118 3,94 1 7 1 6 5 , 1 1 3 5 , 1 1 8 S a t e l l i t e 292 473 765 * * * * 0 0 0 121 8 8 5 F i x e d Wirel e s s 32 16 48 72 1 3 3 1 7 1 1 1 3 25 4 # 519 5 6 7 M o b i l e Wirel e s s 7,899 5,313 13 , 2 1 2 2 5 , 6 2 8 2 6 , 7 4 4 * 2 , 8 8 2 4,706 * 0 7 9 , 6 5 5 9 2 , 8 6 7 Power Line an d Other 0 0 0 * * * * 0 0 0 6 6 Total 9,059 7,369 16 , 4 2 7 2 7 , 1 6 2 3 2 , 0 3 2 2 9 , 8 7 2 1 4 , 5 0 4 14,625 3 4 , 9 8 4 2 , 1 6 2 1 5 5 , 3 4 0 1 7 1 , 7 6 7 Perce n t a g e s aDSL 2.7 2.8 5.5 5 . 0 1 5 . 5 2 7 . 9 3 0 . 9 11.4 3.6 0 . 3 9 4 . 5 1 0 0 . 0 s D S L 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 1 . 3 4 1 . 6 * 5 . 1 2.1 * 0.0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 O t h e r Wir el i n e 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 . 0 1 5 . 4 4 5 . 3 2 7 . 5 2.8 1.1 1 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 C a b l e Modem 0.2 1.8 2.0 0 . 1 1 . 7 4 . 6 6 . 1 14.9 67. 5 3 . 1 9 8 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 FTTP 0.1 0.0 0.1 0 . 2 0 . 8 1 . 8 3 . 8 2.3 77.0 1 4 . 0 9 9 . 9 1 0 0 . 0 S a t e l l i t e 33.0 53.4 86. 4 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 1 3 . 6 1 0 0 . 0 F i x e d Wirel e s s 5.7 2.8 8.5 1 2 . 8 2 3 . 4 3 0 . 2 1 9 . 9 4.4 0.8 0 . 1 9 1 . 5 1 0 0 . 0 M o b i l e Wirel e s s 8.5 5.7 14.2 2 7 . 6 2 8 . 8 * 3 . 1 5.1 * 0.0 8 5 . 8 1 0 0 . 0 Power Line an d Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 Total 5.3 4.3 9.6 1 5 . 8 1 8 . 6 1 7 . 4 8 . 4 8.5 20.4 1 . 3 9 0 . 4 1 0 0 . 0 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withhel d to maintai n firm confide n t i a l it y. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 32 34 Table 14 Nationwide Number of Providers of Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology 2007-2011 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Technology Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun a D S L 864 856 863 881 876 862 875 865 866 s D S L 242 233 238 264 257 261 251 247 252 O t h e r Wir el i n e 246 250 259 292 283 274 267 270 262 C a b l e Modem 282 292 296 342 351 344 345 357 401 FTTP 251 276 308 432 462 485 510 545 577 S a t e l l i t e 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 F i x e d Wirel e s s 484 514 505 620 621 607 625 646 668 M o b i l e Wirel e s s 19 22 24 47 48 51 55 57 64 Power Line an d Othe r 6 7 6 5 6 6 5 7 4 Total 1,374 1,399 1,395 1,562 1,551 1,525 1,536 1,566 1,620 Note: Some histor i c al data have been revis e d . Multipl e Form 477 filers within a holdin g compan y struct ur e count a s one provider. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. Chart 14 Nationwide Number of Providers of Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction Selected Technologies 2007-2011 aD S L C able M o dem FT T P M o bi le W i reles s N um be r of P ro vi de rs 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 J un 2007 D ec 2007 J un 2008 D ec 2008 J un 2009 D ec 2009 J un 2010 D ec 2010 J un 2011 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 33 Detailed Summary Statistics: The States Contents of this section Residential subscribership rates Table 15 Residential Fixed Connections (Approximating the National Broadband Availability Target) and Households by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections with advertised speeds at least 3 mbps down and 768 kbps up) .................35 Table 16 Residential Fixed Connections and H ouseholds by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction).......................................................36 End users of connections Table 17 Connections by Type of End User by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction).......................................................37 Connections by speed and technology Table 18 Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction).......................................................38 Table 19 Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections at least 3 mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream) .................................40 Table 20 Percentage of Connections by Download Speed by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction).......................................................42 Connections for selected technologies Table 21 ADSL Connections by State 2007-2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction).......................................................44 Table 22 Cable Modem Connections by State 2007-2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction).......................................................46 Number of providers Table 23 Providers of Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction).......................................................48 Reported availability for selected technologies Table 24 Percentage of Residential End-User Premises with Access to Services over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by State as of June 30, 2011: xDSL Availability Where ILECs Offer Local Telephone Se rvice and Cable Modem Availability Where Cable Systems Offe r Cable TV Service ................................................................50 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 34 19 Table 15 Residential Fixed Connections (Approximating the National Broadband Availability Target) and Households by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections with advertised speeds at least 3 mbps down and 768 up and households, in thousands) State Connections Households Subscribership Ratio Al a b a ma 424 1 , 86 7 0 . 23 Alas ka * 25 2 * Amer ica n Samo a 0 9 0. 00 Ariz on a 993 2 , 46 4 0 . 40 Arka ns as 215 1 , 14 4 0 . 19 Calif or ni a 5,56 5 1 2 ,6 34 0 . 44 Colo ra do 1,05 6 1 , 97 8 0 . 53 Conne c ti cu t 696 1 , 35 8 0 . 51 Dela wa r e 226 3 4 3 0 . 66 Dist r ic t of Colu mb ia 150 2 7 0 0 . 55 Flor ida 3,06 9 7 , 34 4 0 . 42 Georg i a 1,26 2 3 , 69 7 0 . 34 Guam * 39 * Hawa i i * 43 6 * Idah o 100 5 7 5 0 . 17 Illi no is 1,70 4 4 , 80 3 0 . 35 India na 815 2 , 49 3 0 . 33 Iowa 253 1 , 19 7 0 . 21 Kansa s 276 1 , 10 1 0 . 25 Kent uc k y 567 1 , 71 8 0 . 33 Louis ia na 473 1 , 69 4 0 . 28 Maine 120 5 3 9 0 . 22 Maryl a n d 1,40 3 2 , 15 8 0 . 65 Massa ch us et t s 1,76 2 2 , 56 8 0 . 69 Michig a n 1,46 3 3 , 80 8 0 . 38 Minne so t a 839 2 , 04 6 0 . 41 Miss is si pp i 143 1 , 09 8 0 . 13 Missou r i 531 2 , 37 4 0 . 22 Monta na 136 3 9 4 0 . 35 Nebra sk a 294 7 0 9 0 . 41 Neva d a 360 1 , 00 8 0 . 36 New Hamp s h ire 279 5 1 3 0 . 54 New Jerse y 2,31 7 3 , 19 2 0 . 73 New Me xic o 246 7 5 9 0 . 32 New York 3,52 1 7 , 33 9 0 . 48 North Caro lin a 495 3 , 73 7 0 . 13 North Dako ta 91 2 6 2 0 . 35 Northe rn Mar ian a Isl * 14 * Ohio 854 4 , 54 0 0 . 19 Okla ho ma 349 1 , 45 5 0 . 24 Orego n 731 1 , 52 2 0 . 48 Penns yl va n i a 2,52 4 4 , 92 7 0 . 51 Puer to Rico * 1, 26 2 * Rhode Isl an d * 41 0 * Sout h Caro l in a 349 1 , 78 3 0 . 20 Sout h Dako ta 116 3 1 7 0 . 37 Tenne ss ee 789 2 , 51 1 0 . 31 Texa s 2,50 8 8 , 97 7 0 . 28 Utah 424 8 9 4 0 . 47 Vermo nt 133 2 4 8 0 . 54 Virgi n Islan ds * 41 * Virgi ni a 1,72 5 3 , 05 2 0 . 57 Was hing t on 1,39 3 2 , 61 5 0 . 53 Wes t Vir gi n ia 198 7 4 7 0 . 27 Wisco ns i n 554 2 , 22 0 0 . 25 Wyomin g 93 2 1 9 0 . 43 Tota l 45,2 63 1 1 7, 67 1 0 . 38 # = Rounds to Zero; * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentialit y. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI (Connections); Geolyt ic s 2010 Block- L e ve l Estimat es (Househ o l d s for U.S. and Dist r ict of Columbi a) ; Cens us 2000 (Hou se h o l ds for Puerto Rico, Americ a n Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and U.S. Virgin Islands). U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 35 20 Table 16 Residential Fixed Connections and Households by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction and households, in thousands) State Connections Households Subscribership Ratio Al a b a ma 1,05 2 1 , 86 7 0 . 56 Alas ka 178 2 5 2 0 . 70 Amer ica n Samo a * 9 * Ariz on a 1,60 2 2 , 46 4 0 . 65 Arka ns as 596 1 , 14 4 0 . 52 Calif or ni a 9,30 7 1 2 ,6 34 0 . 74 Colo ra do 1,44 9 1 , 97 8 0 . 73 Conne c ti cu t 1,05 6 1 , 35 8 0 . 78 Dela wa r e 259 3 4 3 0 . 76 Dist r ic t of Colu mb ia 183 2 7 0 0 . 68 Flor ida 5,28 4 7 , 34 4 0 . 72 Georg i a 2,30 5 3 , 69 7 0 . 62 Guam * 39 * Hawa i i * 43 6 * Idah o 348 5 7 5 0 . 60 Illi no is 3,17 2 4 , 80 3 0 . 66 India na 1,53 7 2 , 49 3 0 . 62 Iowa 777 1 , 19 7 0 . 65 Kansa s 726 1 , 10 1 0 . 66 Kent uc k y 1,01 0 1 , 71 8 0 . 59 Louis ia na 977 1 , 69 4 0 . 58 Maine 398 5 3 9 0 . 74 Maryl a n d 1,58 8 2 , 15 8 0 . 74 Massa ch us et t s 1,99 6 2 , 56 8 0 . 78 Michig a n 2,42 4 3 , 80 8 0 . 64 Minne so t a 1,39 5 2 , 04 6 0 . 68 Miss is si pp i 510 1 , 09 8 0 . 46 Missou r i 1,42 4 2 , 37 4 0 . 60 Monta na 257 3 9 4 0 . 65 Nebra sk a 477 7 0 9 0 . 67 Neva d a 648 1 , 00 8 0 . 64 New Hamp s h ire 407 5 1 3 0 . 79 New Jerse y 2,56 2 3 , 19 2 0 . 80 New Me xic o 451 7 5 9 0 . 59 New York 5,35 8 7 , 33 9 0 . 73 North Caro lin a 2,45 5 3 , 73 7 0 . 66 North Dako ta 178 2 6 2 0 . 68 Northe rn Mar ian a Isl * 14 * Ohio 3,00 6 4 , 54 0 0 . 66 Okla ho ma 824 1 , 45 5 0 . 57 Orego n 1,01 4 1 , 52 2 0 . 67 Penns yl va n i a 3,46 5 4 , 92 7 0 . 70 Puer to Rico 507 1 , 26 2 0 . 40 Rhode Isl an d 301 4 1 0 0 . 74 Sout h Caro l in a 1,07 5 1 , 78 3 0 . 60 Sout h Dako ta 193 3 1 7 0 . 61 Tenne ss ee 1,37 8 2 , 51 1 0 . 55 Texa s 5,61 2 8 , 97 7 0 . 63 Utah 630 8 9 4 0 . 70 Vermo nt 182 2 4 8 0 . 74 Virgi n Islan ds 12 4 1 0 . 29 Virgi ni a 2,07 2 3 , 05 2 0 . 68 Was hing t on 1,84 4 2 , 61 5 0 . 71 Wes t Vir gi n ia 423 7 4 7 0 . 57 Wisco ns i n 1,48 6 2 , 22 0 0 . 67 Wyomin g 140 2 1 9 0 . 64 Tota l 78,9 00 1 1 7, 67 1 0 . 67 # = Rounds to Zero; * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentialit y. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI (Connections); Geolyt ic s 2010 Block- L e ve l Estimat es (Househ o l d s for U.S. and Dist r ict of Columbi a) ; Cens us 2000 (Hou se h o l ds for Puerto Rico, Americ a n Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and U.S. Virgin Islands). U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 36 21 Table 17 Connections by Type of End User by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) Connections Percentages State Residential Business Residential Business Total Al a b a ma 2,38 2 2 8 7 8 9 .3 1 0 .7 2 , 66 9 Ala s ka 432 6 6 8 6 .8 1 3 .2 4 9 8 Ame r ica n Samo a * * * * * Ari z on a 3,42 7 5 2 0 8 6 .8 1 3 .2 3 , 94 7 Ark a ns as 1,48 1 2 0 0 8 8 .1 1 1 .9 1 , 68 1 Cali f or ni a 21,7 82 4 , 24 7 8 3 .7 1 6 .3 2 6 ,0 29 Colo ra do 3,10 3 6 1 1 8 3 .6 1 6 .4 3 , 71 3 Con ne c ti cu t 2,22 8 4 0 2 8 4 .7 1 5 .3 2 , 63 0 Dela wa r e 547 9 0 8 5 .9 1 4 .1 6 3 8 Dis t r ic t of Colu mb ia 524 4 7 0 5 2 .7 4 7 .3 9 9 5 Flo r ida 10,2 45 2 , 47 5 8 0 .5 1 9 .5 1 2 ,7 20 Geo rg i a 5,22 1 1 , 19 5 8 1 .4 1 8 .6 6 , 41 7 Guam 62 1 3 8 2 .5 1 7 .5 7 6 Hawa i i 861 1 2 3 8 7 .5 1 2 .5 9 8 4 Idah o 772 1 4 0 8 4 .6 1 5 .4 9 1 2 Ill i no is 7,12 6 1 , 51 9 8 2 .4 1 7 .6 8 , 64 5 Ind ia na 3,24 4 5 2 6 8 6 .0 1 4 .0 3 , 77 0 Iowa 1,39 8 2 2 7 8 6 .0 1 4 .0 1 , 62 5 Kan sa s 1,47 6 4 6 2 7 6 .1 2 3 .9 1 , 93 8 Ken t uc k y 2,07 9 3 6 0 8 5 .2 1 4 .8 2 , 43 9 Loui s ia na 2,53 7 3 9 6 8 6 .5 1 3 .5 2 , 93 3 Maine 661 8 2 8 8 .9 1 1 .1 7 4 3 Mar yl a n d 3,60 9 6 5 3 8 4 .7 1 5 .3 4 , 26 3 Mas sa ch us et t s 4,08 1 7 1 1 8 5 .2 1 4 .8 4 , 79 2 Mich ig a n 4,66 0 1 , 31 7 7 8 .0 2 2 .0 5 , 97 7 Min ne so t a 2,85 1 6 5 4 8 1 .3 1 8 .7 3 , 50 5 Mis s is si pp i 1,45 8 1 6 9 8 9 .6 1 0 .4 1 , 62 8 Misso u r i 3,01 8 7 2 8 8 0 .6 1 9 .4 3 , 74 6 Mon ta na 581 6 8 8 9 .5 1 0 .5 6 4 9 Neb ra sk a 930 1 8 3 8 3 .6 1 6 .4 1 , 11 3 Neva d a 1,57 4 2 9 2 8 4 .4 1 5 .6 1 , 86 6 New Hamp s h ire 757 1 0 9 8 7 .4 1 2 .6 8 6 6 New Jer se y 5,56 4 9 6 5 8 5 .2 1 4 .8 6 , 52 9 New Me xi c o 1,05 0 1 4 4 8 7 .9 1 2 .1 1 , 19 3 New Yor k 11,4 70 2 , 19 4 8 3 .9 1 6 .1 1 3 ,6 64 Nor t h Caro lin a 4,92 2 9 7 7 8 3 .4 1 6 .6 5 , 89 9 Nor t h Dako ta 437 6 2 8 7 .5 1 2 .5 4 9 9 Nor t he rn Mar ian a Isl * * * * * Ohio 6,17 3 1 , 15 5 8 4 .2 1 5 .8 7 , 32 8 Okla ho ma 1,96 7 3 1 0 8 6 .4 1 3 .6 2 , 27 6 Ore go n 2,16 4 3 8 5 8 4 .9 1 5 .1 2 , 54 9 Pen ns yl va n i a 7,05 7 1 , 15 5 8 5 .9 1 4 .1 8 , 21 2 Pue r to Rico 1,26 8 1 5 4 8 9 .2 1 0 .8 1 , 42 2 Rho de Isl an d 595 1 0 4 8 5 .1 1 4 .9 6 9 9 Sou t h Caro l in a 2,25 3 3 2 8 8 7 .3 1 2 .7 2 , 58 1 Sou t h Dako ta 478 5 6 8 9 .5 1 0 .5 5 3 4 Ten ne ss ee 3,22 0 6 1 2 8 4 .0 1 6 .0 3 , 83 3 Texa s 13,9 72 3 , 51 5 7 9 .9 2 0 .1 1 7 ,4 87 Uta h 1,38 5 3 0 5 8 1 .9 1 8 .1 1 , 69 0 Ver mo nt 326 5 2 8 6 .3 1 3 .7 3 7 7 Virg i n Islan ds 52 1 5 7 7 .6 2 2 .4 6 8 Virg i ni a 4,60 5 9 8 2 8 2 .4 1 7 .6 5 , 58 8 Was hi ng t on 3,96 9 8 8 8 8 1 .7 1 8 .3 4 , 85 7 Wes t Vir gi n ia 781 1 1 3 8 7 .4 1 2 .6 8 9 3 W isco ns i n 2,61 0 5 4 4 8 2 .8 1 7 .2 3 , 15 4 W yom in g 334 4 1 8 9 .1 1 0 .9 3 7 5 Tota l 171, 76 7 3 4 ,3 57 8 3 .3 1 6 .7 2 0 6, 12 4 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withhel d to maintai n firm confide n t i a l it y. Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I and VI. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 37 22 Table 18 Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) State ADSL SDSL Other Wireline Cable Modem Fiber Satellite Fixed Wireless Mobile Wireless Power Line and Other Total A l a b a m a 536 5 11 5 5 6 7 * 6 1 , 5 1 3 * 2 , 6 6 9 A l a s k a 79 3 # * 1 * 6 2 9 2 0 4 9 8 A m e r i c a n Samoa * * 0 * * 0 * 0 0 * A r i z o n a 557 1 * 1, 1 0 4 5 * 2 5 2 , 2 2 0 0 3 , 9 4 7 A r k a n s a s 337 # * 28 8 4 * 1 1 , 0 2 0 0 1 , 6 8 1 C a l i f o r n i a 4,471 14 * 4 , 8 5 3 6 2 1 * 2 7 1 5 , 8 3 4 0 2 6 , 0 2 9 C o l o r a d o * 2 22 817 9 * 4 5 2 , 1 2 6 0 3 , 7 1 3 C o n n e c t i c u t * 2 5 713 3 * * 1 , 4 7 9 0 2 , 6 3 0 D e l a w a r e * # 4 164 * * 0 3 5 9 0 6 3 8 D i s t ri c t of Colum b i a * 2 6 * 9 * * 7 8 4 0 9 9 5 F l o r i d a 2,104 2 * 3 , 3 1 3 3 6 1 * 5 6 , 8 4 2 0 1 2 , 7 2 0 G e o r g i a 1,435 1 * 1 , 1 5 1 3 2 * # 3 , 7 3 0 0 6 , 4 1 7 Guam * * * * 0 0 * * 0 7 6 H a wa i i * * 1 * 1 * * 6 0 6 0 9 8 4 I d a h o 185 # * 15 0 2 * 3 1 5 3 0 0 9 1 2 I l l i n o is 1,576 7 * 1 , 7 6 8 1 3 * 4 2 5 , 1 6 3 0 8 , 6 4 5 I n d i a n a 763 3 10 7 6 6 7 0 * 3 4 2 , 0 9 5 * 3 , 7 7 0 I o w a 381 2 * 39 5 2 8 * 2 6 7 7 2 0 1 , 6 2 5 K a n s a s 273 1 * 44 7 3 2 * 2 4 1 , 1 4 1 0 1 , 9 3 8 K e n t u c k y 481 4 * 56 5 1 3 * 7 1 , 3 3 9 0 2 , 4 3 9 L o u i s i a n a 407 2 * 59 3 3 4 * 4 1 , 8 5 5 0 2 , 9 3 3 M a i n e 134 4 2 28 6 4 * * 3 0 4 0 7 4 3 M a r yl a n d * 3 17 797 * * 1 2 , 5 5 2 0 4 , 2 6 3 M a s s a c h u s e t t s * 3 18 1,4 0 1 * * 2 2 , 6 3 3 * 4 , 7 9 2 M i c h i g a n 922 7 19 1 , 6 0 3 9 * 2 8 3 , 3 3 2 * 5 , 9 7 7 M i n n e s o t a 629 14 * 8 0 0 3 1 * 1 7 1 , 9 8 0 0 3 , 5 0 5 M i s s is s i p p i 267 1 * 25 8 2 * # 1 , 0 6 1 0 1 , 6 2 8 M i s s o u r i 862 1 * 61 7 1 0 * 1 3 2 , 1 8 1 0 3 , 7 4 6 M o n t a n a 123 2 2 12 7 5 * 1 8 * 0 6 4 9 N e b r a s k a 173 1 * 31 6 6 * 1 9 5 8 7 0 1 , 1 1 3 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 38 23 Table 18 - Continued Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) State ADSL SDSL Other Wireline Cable Modem Fiber Satellite Fixed Wireless Mobile Wireless Power Line and Other Total N e v a d a 245 # 7 * 3 * 3 1 , 1 5 8 0 1 , 8 6 6 N e w Hampsh i r e 87 1 * 340 1 2 * # 4 1 5 0 8 6 6 N e w Jerse y 449 2 28 1 , 7 5 9 * * # 3 , 7 2 8 0 6 , 5 2 9 N e w Me xic o 271 # * 19 0 3 * 1 6 6 9 8 0 1 , 1 9 3 Ne w York 928 10 47 4 , 0 9 1 * * 2 7 , 7 9 2 * 1 3 , 6 6 4 N o r t h Carolin a 1,026 1 2 6 1 , 5 6 6 2 2 * 1 3 , 2 2 6 * 5 , 8 9 9 N o r t h Dakota 71 1 * 96 2 4 * 7 2 9 6 0 4 9 9 Northe rn Mari an a Isl * 0 * * * 0 * * 0 * Ohi o 1,190 5 1 8 1 , 9 4 3 3 7 * 2 6 4 , 0 7 5 * 7 , 3 2 8 O k l a h o m a 384 # * 47 4 1 0 * 9 1 , 3 6 1 0 2 , 2 7 6 Oreg on 358 4 * 64 0 7 4 * 1 1 1 , 4 3 6 0 2 , 5 4 9 P e n n s yl v a n i a 1,131 6 2 5 2 , 0 5 7 * * 1 4 , 4 6 7 * 8 , 2 1 2 P u e r t o Rico * * 4 * * * * 8 7 1 0 1 , 4 2 2 R h o d e Islan d * # 1 * * * * 3 7 2 0 6 9 9 S o u t h Caroli n a 452 # 12 6 6 4 2 9 * 1 1 , 4 0 6 * 2 , 5 8 1 S o u t h Dakot a 60 1 # 124 1 8 * 9 * 0 5 3 4 T e n n e s s e e 576 5 * 82 4 6 0 * 2 2 , 3 1 3 0 3 , 8 3 3 Texas 2,943 8 * 2 , 5 7 8 3 8 3 * 6 3 1 1 , 3 2 5 0 1 7 , 4 8 7 U t a h 309 2 * 30 3 2 0 * 4 2 1 , 0 0 3 0 1 , 6 9 0 V e r m o n t 87 # 3 104 5 * * 1 6 9 0 3 7 7 V i r g i n Isla n d s * 0 * 0 0 * * * 0 6 8 V i rg i n i a 498 2 32 1 , 1 4 1 * * 4 3 , 3 3 4 * 5 , 5 8 8 W a s h i n g t o n 583 3 * 1, 2 9 6 7 1 * 1 1 2 , 8 4 5 0 4 , 8 5 7 W e s t Virgi n i a * * 2 274 1 * 2 4 2 9 0 8 9 3 W i s c o n s i n 658 16 8 8 7 0 1 3 * 2 7 1 , 5 3 4 * 3 , 1 5 4 W yo m i n g 59 * 1 82 1 * 6 2 1 8 0 3 7 5 Total 31,610 1 5 9 7 7 2 4 6 , 6 9 8 5 , 4 7 6 1 , 2 0 4 6 4 4 1 1 9 , 5 5 6 6 2 0 6 , 1 2 4 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withhel d to maintai n firm confide n t i a l it y. Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 39 24 Table 19 Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections at least 3 mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream, in thousands) State ADSL SDSL Other Wireline Cable Modem Fiber Satellite Fixed Wireless Mobile Wireless Power Line and Other Total A l a b a m a 78 # 2 368 4 * 1 * 0 5 2 3 A l a s k a * * # * # * * * 0 5 9 A m e r i c a n Samoa 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 * A r i z o n a * * 3 777 4 * 3 * 0 1 , 1 6 1 A r k a n s a s 62 * 1 165 3 * * * 0 2 3 3 C a l i f o r n i a 1,008 1 * 4 , 1 9 4 6 0 0 * 8 2 , 1 2 5 0 7 , 9 5 8 C o l o r a d o * # 5 770 5 * 2 0 2 8 4 0 1 , 4 1 1 C o n n e c t i c u t * * 2 671 3 0 * * 0 9 0 6 D e l a w a r e * * 1 147 * 0 0 * 0 2 8 5 D i s t ri c t of Colum b i a * * 3 * 8 0 * * 0 4 3 7 F l o r i d a 439 # 17 2 , 4 7 4 * * 2 1 , 3 0 9 0 4 , 5 8 4 G e o r g i a 290 # 8 1, 0 1 2 2 2 * # * 0 1 , 9 0 1 Guam * * * * 0 0 * * 0 8 H a wa i i * * # * 1 0 0 * 0 4 5 6 I d a h o 79 * # 33 2 * 3 * 0 1 8 7 I l l i n o is 308 2 * 1, 4 9 2 9 * 1 1 1 , 1 0 2 0 2 , 9 3 3 I n d i a n a 201 * 2 61 1 6 4 * 6 1 8 0 0 1 , 0 6 4 I o w a 145 # 1 12 1 1 3 * 6 * 0 4 5 4 K a n s a s 51 # * 222 1 8 * 1 3 0 3 0 5 9 7 K e n t u c k y 172 * 1 41 7 6 * 2 1 8 4 0 7 8 2 L o u i s i a n a 36 * 1 430 2 4 * # * 0 5 2 4 M a i n e 74 # # 67 4 * * * 0 1 8 7 M a r yl a n d * * 5 748 * * # 3 5 3 0 1 , 8 4 7 M a s s a c h u s e t t s * # 8 1,31 1 * * 1 3 0 9 0 2 , 2 0 1 M i c h i g a n 197 1 * 1, 3 3 4 7 * 1 6 6 0 0 2 , 2 0 5 M i n n e s o t a 198 2 * 67 7 1 8 * 1 3 4 8 0 1 , 2 4 7 M i s s is s i p p i 20 * # 138 1 * * * 0 1 7 2 M i s s o u r i 167 * 5 38 7 4 * 1 4 0 6 0 9 7 0 M o n t a n a 26 * # * 3 * 1 0 0 1 4 8 N e b r a s k a 75 * # 233 2 0 1 * 0 3 3 1 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 40 25 Table 19 - Continued Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections at least 3 mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream, in thousands) State ADSL SDSL Other Wireline Cable Modem Fiber Satellite Fixed Wireless Mobile Wireless Power Line and Other Total N e v a d a 54 * 1 * 2 * 2 * 0 5 9 2 N e w Hampsh i r e 45 # 1 252 * 0 0 * 0 3 3 5 N e w Jerse y 245 # 9 * * * # * 0 2 , 8 8 7 N e w Me xic o 102 * 1 16 0 2 * 1 * 0 2 8 5 Ne w York 441 1 19 2 , 6 7 2 * * 1 * 0 5 , 0 6 0 N o r t h Carolin a 264 # * 27 3 1 6 * # 5 7 9 0 1 , 1 3 9 N o r t h Dakota 22 * # 69 1 0 0 * 0 0 1 0 4 Northe rn Mari an a Isl * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 0 * Ohi o 424 * 4 50 9 3 2 * 2 5 2 5 * 1 , 4 9 8 O k l a h o m a 60 * 1 297 6 * * 1 7 1 0 5 3 6 Oreg on 118 # * 59 7 7 0 * 3 2 3 0 0 1 , 0 1 9 P e n n s yl v a n i a 530 * 8 1, 6 8 2 * * # 5 5 0 0 3 , 2 7 0 P u e r t o Rico * * * * * * * * 0 5 9 R h o d e Islan d * * # * * 0 * * 0 3 5 4 S o u t h Caroli n a 93 * 3 269 1 8 * # 1 2 6 0 5 0 9 S o u t h Dakot a 10 0 # 109 1 0 * 1 * 0 1 3 5 T e n n e s s e e 70 # * 728 4 2 * # 3 0 6 0 1 , 1 5 1 Texas 735 # * 1, 5 6 4 3 3 8 * 2 4 2 , 1 5 7 0 4 , 8 3 6 U t a h 124 * 1 27 8 1 9 * 3 0 * 0 6 1 7 V e r m o n t 53 * # 93 4 * 0 * 0 1 5 2 V i r g i n Isla n d s 0 0 * 0 0 0 * 0 0 * V i rg i n i a 257 # 13 1 , 0 4 7 * * 2 4 4 6 0 2 , 2 8 9 W a s h i n g t o n 210 * 3 1, 2 1 3 6 5 * 2 4 1 5 0 1 , 9 0 8 W e s t Virgi n i a 2 0 # 206 1 * * * 0 2 4 4 W i s c o n s i n 137 2 2 44 7 8 0 2 3 9 8 0 9 9 8 W yo m i n g 17 * * 81 1 * 1 0 0 1 0 1 Total 8,909 16 2 0 2 3 4 , 1 1 4 5 , 1 8 8 # 1 4 5 1 7 , 2 7 2 3 6 5 , 8 4 9 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withhel d to maintai n firm confide n t i a l it y. Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 41 26 Table 20 Percentage of Connections by Downstream Speed by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Over 200 kbps Upstream and State % over 200 kbps Downstream % at least 768 kbps Downstream % at least 3 mbps Downstream % at least 6 mbps Downstream % at least 10 mbps Downstream A l a b a m a 89.1 70.9 29.7 23.0 12.4 Alask a 90.0 84.2 25.2 15.4 10.3 Americ a n Samoa * * * * * Arizon a 89.9 69.8 37.3 29.1 20.8 Arkan s a s 92.0 76.6 21.8 13.6 11.1 Califo r n i a 89.0 74.2 35.1 25.9 18.2 Colorado 91.9 75.2 39.1 34.2 22.0 Connec t i c u t 91.3 74.1 37.8 30.8 22.4 Delaware 89.0 69.8 47.1 41.1 33.8 Distri c t of Colum b i a 89.8 69.0 45.2 38.8 12.2 Florida 91.7 82.0 44.9 34.9 21.6 Geor gia 89.5 74.3 37.0 25.1 15.7 Guam * * * * * Hawai i 94.7 82.8 47.7 31.2 17.2 Idaho 87.4 64.9 35.1 15.5 5.3 Illin o is 91.8 78.4 39.0 27.4 17.1 Indiana 88.7 71.4 33.4 22.8 16.6 Iowa 90.1 70.1 47.1 25.6 7.8 Kansa s 88.6 74.6 42.7 29.0 11.7 Kentu c k y 90.6 80.7 40.2 26.0 17.7 Louisi a n a 89.4 79.6 24.8 17.5 13.5 Maine 89.5 76.9 49.5 34.5 8.9 Maryla n d 88.5 71.1 44.1 35.5 29.8 Massa c h u s e t t s 90.2 73.0 46.9 39.8 34.1 Michi g a n 87.8 71.6 40.2 31.1 16.6 Minnes o t a 90.0 73.9 41.4 34.0 21.1 Miss is s i p p i 93.0 62.8 20.3 11.3 4.9 Misso u r i 90.6 80.4 34.4 22.6 11.1 Montana 82.7 55.5 25.2 19.9 1.0 Nebras k a 84.7 59.7 37.1 23.8 20.5 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 42 27 Table 20 - Continued Percentage of Connections by Downstream Speed by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Over 200 kbps Upstream and State % over 200 kbps Downstream % at least 768 kbps Downstream % at least 3 mbps Downstream % at least 6 mbps Downstream % at least 10 mbps Downstream N e v a d a 92.6 80.9 41.0 27.5 18.4 New Hampsh i r e 87.9 65.1 46.9 37.6 33.1 New Jerse y 88.9 70.0 45.3 39.5 35.1 New Me xic o 87.9 66.4 26.9 21.8 6.7 New York 89.0 72.9 47.3 38.4 31.3 North Caroli n a 86.9 68.5 43.5 30.7 8.1 North Dakota 87.0 63.2 29.8 19.8 16.6 Northe rn Mari an a Isl * * * * * Ohio 84.6 63.9 36.5 26.2 6.5 Oklaho m a 93.1 86.9 32.8 16.4 13.0 Oreg on 92.1 77.3 42.1 34.9 24.8 Penns yl v a n i a 89.3 72.5 44.0 32.4 25.6 Puerto Rico 85.0 78.4 19.8 9.4 0.4 Rhode Islan d 90.9 75.2 50.8 42.5 36.2 South Caroli n a 86.0 66.0 36.7 27.4 14.3 South Dakot a 86.4 66.7 30.5 28.5 22.5 Tennes s e e 88.0 67.6 35.1 27.4 19.6 Texas 92.3 81.7 36.0 24.8 10.8 Utah 92.5 77.1 39.7 32.1 18.9 Vermont 87.6 71.7 41.3 30.0 15.8 Virgi n Isla n d s 92.5 74.4 * * * Virgi n i a 88.4 68.7 42.5 32.5 24.8 Washin g t o n 91.7 76.9 41.4 34.9 26.3 West Virgi n i a 91.6 84.6 46.7 40.1 19.1 Wisco n s i n 90.6 77.7 45.4 30.1 14.9 Wyomin g 86.7 57.6 28.6 22.9 1.6 Total 89.7 74.3 39.2 29.3 18.9 * = Data withhel d to maintai n firm confide n t i a l it y. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 43 28 Table 21 ADSL Connections by State 2007-2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 State Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun A l a b a m a 357 403 4 3 1 457 473 496 498 523 536 A l a s k a 64 68 72 75 77 77 77 78 79 A m e r i c a n Samoa * * * * * * * * * A r i z o n a 406 437 4 5 4 466 487 518 527 552 557 A r k a n s a s 227 249 2 6 7 273 298 308 314 330 337 C a l i f o r n i a 4,626 4, 7 8 0 4 , 7 5 5 4,617 4,587 4,568 4,456 4,538 4,471 C o l o r a d o 530 573 5 7 5 624 641 651 658 663 * C o n n e c t i c u t * * * * * * * * * D e l a w a r e * * * * * * * * * D i s t ri c t of Colum b i a * * * * * * * * * F l o r i d a 1,960 2, 0 4 6 2 , 0 4 5 2,005 1,962 1,988 2,006 2,070 2,104 G e o r g i a 1,219 1, 3 0 7 1 , 3 6 1 1,240 1,251 1,256 1,129 1,413 1,435 Guam * * * * * * * * * H a wa i i * * * * * * * * * I d a h o 129 142 1 5 4 160 169 174 177 181 185 I l l i n o is 1,300 1, 3 8 2 1 , 4 1 9 1,503 1,538 1,556 1,537 1,577 1,576 I n d i a n a 584 636 6 5 1 672 699 721 725 754 763 I o w a 271 298 3 2 2 336 351 362 373 376 381 K a n s a s 225 236 2 4 1 243 250 260 264 271 273 K e n t u c k y 340 367 3 8 5 421 431 454 459 473 481 L o u i s i a n a 306 333 3 5 4 385 390 404 397 396 407 M a i n e 115 118 1 2 0 114 123 125 126 125 134 M a r yl a n d 512 514 4 9 5 471 440 405 * 350 * M a s s a c h u s e t t s * * * * * * * * * M i c h i g a n 690 733 7 4 9 780 835 857 860 902 922 M i n n e s o t a 449 496 5 2 9 544 573 590 611 618 629 M i s s is s i p p i 180 202 2 2 0 229 240 255 240 263 267 M i s s o u r i 618 683 7 1 2 727 767 805 811 846 862 M o n t a n a 96 102 10 8 108 111 115 119 119 123 N e b r a s k a 124 135 1 4 3 151 158 164 167 169 173 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 44 29 Table 21 - Continued ADSL Connections by State 2007-2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 State Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun N e v a d a 207 220 2 2 5 222 225 229 232 242 245 N e w Hampsh i r e 98 100 97 91 91 86 84 85 87 N e w Jerse y 735 735 7 0 0 666 624 568 530 486 449 N e w Me xic o 180 200 2 1 7 231 242 250 259 266 271 Ne w York 1,182 1, 1 8 4 1 , 1 6 9 1,122 1,100 1,046 1,010 957 928 N o r t h Carolin a 725 820 8 7 0 891 918 969 985 995 1,026 N o r t h Dakota 51 56 60 65 64 67 67 69 71 Northe rn Mari an a Isl * * * * * * * * * Ohi o 951 1,02 4 1 , 0 3 4 1,069 1,109 1,127 1,145 1,177 1,190 O k l a h o m a 302 324 3 3 4 338 349 359 361 379 384 Oreg on 339 356 3 6 1 371 367 367 362 359 358 P e n n s yl v a n i a 1,126 1, 1 9 1 1 , 2 0 9 1,231 1,246 1,232 1,202 1,159 1,131 P u e r t o Rico * * * * * * * * * R h o d e Islan d * * * * * * * * * S o u t h Caroli n a 323 359 3 8 6 400 412 428 437 434 452 S o u t h Dakot a 46 48 53 56 58 58 60 58 60 T e n n e s s e e 447 499 5 3 5 541 549 559 570 557 576 Texas 2,294 2, 4 6 4 2 , 4 7 5 2,608 2,706 2,784 2,797 2,898 2,943 U t a h 250 270 2 8 4 299 280 309 312 311 309 V e r m o n t 68 72 73 61 79 81 84 85 87 V i r g i n Isla n d s * * * * * * * * * V i rg i n i a 548 568 5 6 1 553 547 536 527 507 498 W a s h i n g t o n 569 592 6 0 0 599 596 593 589 582 583 W e s t Virgi n i a 124 138 1 4 7 152 160 161 162 * * W i s c o n s i n 484 528 5 5 6 556 586 612 615 646 658 W yo m i n g 50 53 55 57 58 58 59 59 59 Total 27,793 2 9 , 4 4 9 2 9 , 9 6 4 30,198 30,631 30,987 30,759 31,470 31,610 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withhel d to maintai n firm confide n t i a l it y. Note: Some hi stori c a l data have been revise d . Figures may not sum to totals due to roundin g. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 45 30 Table 22 Cable Modem Connections by State 2007-2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 State Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun A l a b a m a 374 399 4 1 7 460 478 497 513 539 556 A l a s k a * * * * * * * * * A m e r i c a n Samoa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * A r i z o n a 850 897 9 9 2 1,044 1,039 1,104 1,096 1,161 1,104 A r k a n s a s 205 214 2 3 6 227 252 262 267 278 288 C a l i f o r n i a 3,411 3, 6 0 3 3 , 7 9 9 3,990 4,144 4,223 4,418 4,639 4,853 C o l o r a d o 561 604 6 2 6 659 693 709 744 787 817 C o n n e c t i c u t 513 550 5 7 6 615 626 640 672 673 713 D e l a w a r e * * * * * * 158 156 164 D i s t ri c t of Colum b i a * * * * * * * * * F l o r i d a 2,344 2, 5 4 3 2 , 6 3 1 2,825 2,859 2,992 3,076 3,292 3,313 G e o r g i a 802 862 9 0 4 974 1,020 1,022 1,052 1,114 1,151 Guam 0 * * * * * * * * H a wa i i * * * * * * * * * I d a h o 116 123 1 2 7 121 130 133 137 145 150 I l l i n o is 1,466 1, 5 7 0 1 , 6 2 5 1,591 1,575 1,577 1,630 1,696 1,768 I n d i a n a 410 439 4 5 6 626 641 669 697 728 766 I o w a 268 287 3 0 9 330 344 360 376 389 395 K a n s a s 351 369 3 8 0 415 419 435 434 441 447 K e n t u c k y 384 435 4 8 2 452 483 497 512 530 565 L o u i s i a n a 446 485 4 8 1 518 544 559 562 586 593 M a i n e 169 179 1 9 7 202 224 237 259 269 286 M a r yl a n d 829 865 8 7 1 801 757 768 778 773 797 M a s s a c h u s e t t s 1,088 1, 1 3 6 1 , 1 5 9 1,291 1,253 1,250 1,339 1,343 1,401 M i c h i g a n 1,197 1, 2 6 5 1 , 3 0 7 1,394 1,431 1,451 1,517 1,537 1,603 M i n n e s o t a 571 608 6 2 2 666 685 701 739 776 800 M i s s is s i p p i 152 166 1 8 8 216 227 232 241 246 258 M i s s o u r i 473 498 5 1 7 560 561 586 599 604 617 M o n t a n a 74 83 90 92 102 108 113 119 127 N e b r a s k a 238 252 2 6 2 278 286 295 293 309 316 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 46 31 Table 22 - Continued Cable Modem Connections by State 2007-2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 State Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun N e v a d a * * * * * * * * * N e w Hampsh i r e 230 240 2 5 0 285 295 303 329 325 340 N e w Jerse y 1,474 1, 5 3 8 1 , 5 8 6 1,637 1,604 1,623 1,698 1,702 1,759 N e w Me xic o 117 127 1 3 7 146 155 158 168 176 190 Ne w York 3,164 3, 3 4 2 3 , 5 4 8 3,749 3,850 3,886 3,982 4,013 4,091 N o r t h Carolin a 1,134 1, 1 9 6 1 , 2 6 6 1,344 1,392 1,444 1,513 1,554 1,566 N o r t h Dakota 76 80 83 85 88 93 90 101 96 Northe rn Mari an a Isl 0 * * * * * * * * Ohi o 1,406 1, 4 9 8 1 , 6 2 7 1,705 1,757 1,813 1,862 1,895 1,943 O k l a h o m a 348 373 3 8 2 408 429 432 436 468 474 Oreg on 490 531 5 5 4 517 528 542 576 608 640 P e n n s yl v a n i a 1,271 1, 3 9 9 1 , 4 9 2 1,800 1,777 1,835 1,915 1,983 2,057 P u e r t o Rico * * * * * * * * * R h o d e Islan d * * * * * * * * * S o u t h Caroli n a 459 496 5 1 7 555 582 598 627 660 664 S o u t h Dakot a 101 111 1 1 5 122 122 127 118 134 124 T e n n e s s e e 663 703 7 1 5 718 739 751 784 795 824 Texas 2,082 2, 1 8 3 2 , 2 1 4 1,971 2,280 2,383 2,456 2,459 2,578 U t a h * * 212 * 243 253 268 283 303 V e r m o n t * * * 71 80 83 93 97 104 V i r g i n Isla n d s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V i rg i n i a 906 921 9 4 1 1,096 1,097 1,105 1,114 1,124 1,141 W a s h i n g t o n 862 909 9 4 4 998 1,102 1,106 1,186 1,239 1,296 W e s t Virgi n i a 156 159 1 6 7 205 215 226 220 255 274 W i s c o n s i n 637 676 7 1 1 759 779 802 823 846 870 W yo m i n g * * * 64 70 74 76 80 82 Total 34,404 3 6 , 5 0 7 3 8 , 1 9 0 40,251 41,434 42,438 43,923 45,334 46,698 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withhel d to maintai n firm confide n t i a l it y. Note: Some hi stori c a l data have been revise d . Figures may not sum to totals due to roundin g. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 47 32 Table 23 Providers of Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) State ADSL SDSL Other Wireline Cable Modem Fiber Satellite Fixed Wireless Mobile Wireless Power Line and Other Total A l a b a m a 26 9 22 22 25 * 1 6 6 * 8 1 A l a s k a 12 4 6 4 5 * 8 6 0 2 2 A m e r i c a n Samoa * * 0 * * 0 * 0 0 * A r i z o n a 24 7 24 11 24 4 2 2 6 0 7 6 A r k a n s a s 21 8 12 17 15 * 5 5 0 5 3 C a l i f o r n i a 36 20 46 23 2 8 * 3 5 1 0 0 1 2 3 C o l o r a d o 34 10 31 17 2 4 * 3 2 1 0 0 9 5 C o n n e c t i c u t 8 8 19 8 14 * * 4 0 3 6 D e l a w a r e 5 4 14 4 6 * 0 6 0 2 7 D i s t ri c t of Colum b i a 10 8 23 * 8 * * 5 0 3 4 F l o r i d a 30 19 46 21 3 4 * 2 3 7 0 9 9 G e o r g i a 34 16 35 34 4 2 * 8 8 0 1 0 4 Guam * * * * 0 0 * * 0 5 H a wa i i 4 4 5 * 6 * * 5 0 1 9 I d a h o 25 6 18 13 20 * 1 7 8 0 6 1 I l l i n o is 60 22 44 21 2 9 * 5 1 1 1 0 1 4 4 I n d i a n a 36 13 25 15 3 9 * 4 2 7 * 9 7 I o w a 130 31 27 43 7 2 * 6 7 1 0 0 2 1 0 K a n s a s 41 14 22 27 3 8 * 3 1 1 1 0 9 7 K e n t u c k y 27 10 20 29 2 1 * 1 8 9 0 8 9 L o u i s i a n a 18 7 20 16 17 * 6 6 0 5 8 M a i n e 13 9 11 6 10 * * 5 0 2 9 M a r yl a n d 15 10 29 12 1 5 * 8 6 0 5 8 M a s s a c h u s e t t s 14 9 29 11 12 * 7 6 * 5 6 M i c h i g a n 39 20 35 17 2 2 * 3 0 9 * 9 8 M i n n e s o t a 56 18 28 19 4 4 * 3 2 6 0 1 0 8 M i s s is s i p p i 20 5 19 12 11 * 5 6 0 5 3 M i s s o u r i 39 15 26 22 2 6 * 3 6 7 0 1 0 2 M o n t a n a 24 10 14 7 13 * 1 6 * 0 4 9 N e b r a s k a 34 9 11 21 27 * 2 8 8 0 7 7 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 48 33 Table 23 - Continued Providers of Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) State ADSL SDSL Other Wireline Cable Modem Fiber Satellite Fixed Wireless Mobile Wireless Power Line and Other Total N e v a d a 17 9 20 5 17 * 7 7 0 5 0 N e w Hampsh i r e 13 8 17 6 11 * 4 6 0 4 1 N e w Jerse y 20 12 37 6 13 * 5 6 0 5 6 N e w Me xic o 23 8 16 8 11 * 1 5 1 0 0 5 3 Ne w York 44 16 39 19 2 6 * 1 6 6 * 9 8 N o r t h Carolin a 26 9 29 24 28 * 9 9 * 7 8 N o r t h Dakota 32 10 15 7 18 * 1 5 4 0 4 9 Northe rn Mari an a Isl * 0 * * * 0 * * 0 * Ohi o 41 17 31 29 3 3 * 2 4 8 * 1 0 6 O k l a h o m a 40 7 22 14 16 * 1 4 1 1 0 7 9 Oreg on 40 14 29 16 3 3 * 2 0 6 0 8 4 P e n n s yl v a n i a 36 12 38 25 2 4 * 1 1 7 * 9 3 P u e r t o Rico * * 6 * * * * 5 0 1 5 R h o d e Islan d 6 4 11 4 6 * * 5 0 2 4 S o u t h Caroli n a 21 5 20 16 18 * 5 8 * 5 2 S o u t h Dakot a 30 6 12 7 20 * 2 0 5 0 5 6 T e n n e s s e e 25 13 22 16 2 3 * 1 3 7 0 7 6 Texas 70 24 54 33 4 6 * 5 7 1 0 0 1 6 5 U t a h 17 9 20 8 17 * 1 3 7 0 5 1 V e r m o n t 10 5 14 6 8 * * 4 0 3 4 V i r g i n Isla n d s * 0 * 0 0 * * * 0 7 V i rg i n i a 28 15 31 15 2 1 * 1 6 8 * 7 7 W a s h i n g t o n 30 9 28 16 29 * 2 4 7 0 8 3 W e s t Virgi n i a 8 * 18 12 9 * 4 8 0 4 4 W i s c o n s i n 49 17 25 19 2 7 * 2 5 8 * 9 8 W yo m i n g 12 6 7 4 6 * 11 6 0 3 5 Total 866 252 262 4 0 1 5 7 7 5 6 6 8 6 4 4 1 , 6 2 0 * Indic at es one to three providers . Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 49 34 Table 24 Percentage of Residential End-User Premises with Access to Services over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by State as of June 30, 2011 State xDSL Availability Where ILECs Offer Local Telephone Service Cable Modem Availability Where Cable Systems Offer Cable TV Service Al a b a ma 82 94 Alas ka 76 * Amer i ca n Samo a * * Ariz on a 90 99 Arka ns as 81 83 Calif or ni a 88 99 Colo ra do * 98 Conne c ti cu t * 100 Dela wa r e * 99 Dist r ic t of Colu mb ia * * Flor i da 89 97 Georg i a 94 94 Guam * * Hawa i i * * Idah o 87 98 Illi no is 88 97 India na 87 97 Iowa 85 93 Kansa s 87 92 Kent uc k y 88 93 Loui s ia na 85 94 Maine 85 96 Maryl a n d * 99 Massa ch us et t s * 100 Michig a n 79 98 Minne so t a 91 97 Miss is si pp i 80 91 Misso u ri 85 96 Monta na 84 94 Nebra sk a 87 95 Neva d a 93 * New Hamp s h ire 87 98 New Jerse y 80 100 New Me xic o 88 93 New York 76 100 North Caro lin a 94 95 North Dako ta 90 92 Northe rn Mar ian a Isl * * Ohio 88 95 Okla ho ma 83 93 Orego n 91 98 Penns yl va n i a 75 97 Puer to Rico * * Rhode Isl an d * * Sout h Caro l in a 90 95 Sout h Dako ta 82 88 Tenne ss ee 85 98 Texa s 83 98 Utah 95 94 Vermo nt 91 71 Virgi n Islan ds * 0 Virgi ni a 67 96 Was hing t on 89 97 Wes t Vir gi n ia * 93 Wisco ns i n 87 98 Wyom in g 83 93 Tota l 84 97 * = Data withhel d to maintai n firm confide n t i a l it y. Note: This tabl e summa r i z es respo ns e s to Form 477 quest ion s about service availab i l i t y, as opp os e d to subsc r ib e rs h i p. xDSL inclu d es both asymm e t r i c and symmetric DS L. Each stat e- s p e c i f i c estimate is a weighted average of the availability percen t a g es that ILECs or cable system operat o rs report for the areas they serve . Repor t ed xDSL avail a b i l i t y is weight e d by ILEC end-us e r switch e d ac cess lines and VoIP lines . Reported cable modem availability is weighted by cable TV subscribers. T he weighted averages include ILECs or cabl e syste m operat o rs that report no avail a b i l i t y. Figur es are pres ent e d to the near es t perc e nt . Source: FCC Form 477, Parts I and II; Warren Communi cations News , Inc., Television & Cable Fa ctbook : Online (Cable General Informa t i o n , Februar y 2010). U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 50 Detailed Summary Statistics: Counties and Census Tracts Contents of this section All counties Chart 15 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to County Households as of June 30, 2011 ............................................................................................................52 Table 25 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Directio n to County Households by Technology as of June 30, 2011 ............................................................................................................53 All census tracts Chart 16 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2011 ............................................................................................................54 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households by Technology as of June 30, 2011 ............................................................................................................55 Table 27 Percentage of Census Tracts with Residential Fixed Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction).......................56 Counties and census tracts in individual states Table 28 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to County Households by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) ........................................................................................................57 Table 29 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) .......................................................................................................59 Maps: Residential subscription ratios by census tract Map 1 Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction per 1,000 Households by Census Tract as of June 30, 2011 .............................................61 Map 2 Residential Fixed Connections at Least 768 kbps Downstream and 200 kbps Upstream per 1,000 Households by Census Tract as of June 30, 2011.............................62 Maps: Number of providers by census tract Map 3 Providers of Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Census Tract as of June 30, 2011 .................................................................................63 Map 4 Providers of Residential Fixed C onnections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Census Tract as of June 30, 2011 .................................................................64 Map 5 Providers of Residential Fixed C onnections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Census Tract as of June 30, 2011 ..........................................65 Map 6 Providers of Mobile Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Census Tract as of June 30, 2011 .................................................................................66 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 51 35 Chart 15 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to County Households as of June 30, 2011 S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s ; and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 . No te : R atio s o ve r 1 we re s e t to 1 . S e e T e c hnic al No te s at the e nd o f the re p o rt. 0 0. 0 5 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 5 0. 2 0 0 . 2 5 0 . 3 0 0. 3 5 0 . 4 0 0 . 4 5 0. 5 0 0 . 5 5 0 . 6 0 0. 6 5 0 . 7 0 0 . 7 5 0. 8 0 0 . 8 5 0 . 9 0 0. 9 5 M a x 0 % 2 % 4 % 6 % 8 % 1 0 % 1 2 % 1 4 % P e r c e n t a g e o f C o u n t i e s Nu m b er of Cou n t ies 3 , 2 3 2 Med ian 0 . 5 5 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to County Households 16 17 19 23 51 111 128 219 278 366 382 370 397 291 214 137 94 42 17 60 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 52 36 Table 25 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to County Households by Technology as of June 30, 2011 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to County Households Technology Zero Greater than 0 and no more than 5% Greater than 5 and no more than 10% Greater than 10 and no more than 20% Greater than 20 and no more than 30% Greater than 30 and no more than 40% Greater than 40 and no more than 50% Greater than 50 and no more than 60% Greater than 60 and no more than 80% Greater than 80 and no more than 100% 100% or more aDSL 0.7 2. 4 5 . 1 2 6 . 7 2 9 . 0 2 0 . 7 9.5 3. 5 1 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 3 sDSL 83.1 1 5 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 O t h e r Wirel i n e 95.3 4 . 5 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 C a b l e Modem 13.8 9 . 3 1 0 . 2 1 8 . 4 1 8 . 0 1 4 . 1 9.6 4. 5 1 . 9 0 . 2 0 . 1 F T T P 61.9 2 7 . 6 3 . 6 2 . 9 2 . 0 0 . 9 0.7 0. 2 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 0 Satellite 0.7 83 . 7 1 2 . 7 2 . 7 0 . 1 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 F i xe d Wirel e s s 48.1 4 0 . 9 6 . 6 3 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 2 0.1 0. 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 P o we r Line 99.5 0 . 5 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 A l l Other 100.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 Total 0.1 0. 4 0 . 5 1 . 3 5 . 0 1 0 . 7 19.9 2 3 . 3 3 2 . 1 5 . 3 1 . 3 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. See Technical Notes at the end of the re port. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolyt ics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 53 37 Chart 16 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2011 S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s ; and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 . No te : R atio s o ve r 2 we re s e t to 2 . S e e T e c hnic al No te s at the e nd o f the re p o rt. 0 0 .1 0 0 . 2 0 0 . 3 0 0 .4 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 6 0 0 .7 0 0 . 8 0 0 . 9 0 1 .0 0 1 . 1 0 1 . 2 0 1 .3 0 1 . 4 0 1 . 5 0 1 .6 0 1 . 7 0 1 . 8 0 1 .9 0 M a x 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 P e r c e n t a g e o f T r a c t s Nu m b er of Trac t s 6 6 , 2 8 7 Med ian 0 . 6 2 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 54 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households by Technology as of June 30, 2011 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households Technology Zero Greater than 0 and no more than 5% Greater than 5 and no more than 10% Greater than 10 and no more than 20% Greater than 20 and no more than 30% Greater than 30 and no more than 40% Greater than 40 and no more than 50% Greater than 50 and no more than 60% Greater than 60 and no more than 80% Greater than 80 and no more than 100% 100% or more aDSL 4.9 9. 9 1 0 . 4 2 5 . 1 2 0 . 6 1 3 . 7 7.7 3. 6 2 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 sDSL 95.7 4 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 O t h e r Wirel i n e 99.0 0 . 9 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 C a b l e Modem 6.2 3. 8 3 . 8 1 2 . 4 1 6 . 6 1 6 . 7 14.6 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 1 2 . 9 2 . 1 F T T P 79.8 7 . 9 1 . 7 2 . 7 2 . 1 1 . 7 1.3 1. 0 1 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 Satellite 46.5 4 7 . 9 3 . 9 1 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 F i xe d Wirel e s s 84.6 1 2 . 2 1 . 7 1 . 1 0 . 3 0 . 1 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 P o we r Line 99.9 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 A l l Other 100.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 Total 0.8 0. 4 0 . 5 2 . 7 6 . 5 1 0 . 0 12.6 1 4 . 1 2 5 . 0 1 5 . 3 1 2 . 1 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. See Technical Notes at the end of the re port. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolyt ics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 55 39 Table 27 Percentage of Census Tracts with Residential Fixed Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Number of Providers Technology Zero One Two Three Four Five Six Seven or More aDSL 4.9 46 . 1 3 5 . 2 1 1 . 6 1.9 0. 3 0 . 0 0 . 0 sDSL 95.7 4 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 O t h e r Wireli n e 99.0 1. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 C a b l e Modem 6.2 80 . 7 1 2 . 4 0 . 7 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 F T T P 79.8 1 9 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 1 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 Satellite 46.5 2 1 . 8 2 8 . 1 3 . 6 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 F i xe d Wirele s s 84.6 12 . 0 2 . 8 0 . 6 0.1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 P o we r Line 99.9 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 a D S L and/o r Cable Modem and/o r FTTP 1.1 6. 2 3 9 . 4 3 4 . 5 14.8 3 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 1 A n y Technol o g y 0.8 2. 6 1 7 . 8 2 5 . 5 25.0 1 5 . 9 7 . 6 4 . 8 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI and Census 2000. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 56 40 Table 28 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to County Households by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to County Households State Counties Zero Greater than 0 and no more than 5% Greater than 5 and no more than 10% Greater than 10 and no more than 20% Greater than 20 and no more than 30% Greater than 30 and no more than 40% Greater than 40 and no more than 50% Greater than 50 and no more than 60% Greater than 60 and no more than 80% Greater than 80 and no more than 100% 100% or more A l a b a m a 67 0 0 0 2 5 12 25 13 9 1 0 A l a s k a 27 0 0 0 3 1 2 4 4 11 2 0 A m e r i c a n Samoa 5 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 A r i z o n a 15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 8 0 0 A r k a n s a s 75 0 0 0 0 2 24 32 11 6 0 0 C a l i f o r n i a 58 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 12 30 7 2 C o l o r a d o 64 0 0 0 0 1 2 6 19 22 10 4 C o n n e c t i c u t 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 De l a w a r e 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 D i s t ri c t of Colum b i a 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 F l o r i d a 67 0 0 0 0 2 2 14 7 36 5 1 G e o r g i a 159 0 11 9 11 14 1 4 25 19 34 1 8 4 Guam 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 H a wa i i 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 Id a h o 44 0 0 0 2 1 3 9 11 18 0 0 I l l i n o is 102 0 0 0 1 3 12 24 25 31 3 3 I n d i a n a 92 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 29 23 2 1 I o w a 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 45 46 1 0 K a n s a s 105 0 0 0 0 0 4 17 40 40 4 0 K e n t u c k y 120 0 0 0 1 9 16 31 34 29 0 0 L o u i s i a n a 64 0 0 0 0 6 12 15 15 15 1 0 M a i n e 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 3 0 M a r yl a n d 24 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 11 5 1 M a s s a c h u s e t t s 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 3 M i c h i g a n 83 0 0 0 1 5 5 18 19 33 1 1 M i n n e s o t a 87 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 26 47 3 0 M i s s is s i p p i 82 0 0 1 4 26 26 14 3 7 0 1 M i s s o u r i 115 0 0 1 1 3 16 46 30 16 2 0 M o n t a n a 56 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 20 24 1 0 N e b r a s k a 93 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 27 40 1 0 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 57 41 Table 28 - Continued Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to County Households by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to County Households State Counties Zero Greater than 0 and no more than 5% Greater than 5 and no more than 10% Greater than 10 and no more than 20% Greater than 20 and no more than 30% Greater than 30 and no more than 40% Greater than 40 and no more than 50% Greater than 50 and no more than 60% Greater than 60 and no more than 80% Greater than 80 and no more than 100% 100% or more N e v a d a 17 0 0 0 1 0 4 3 2 7 0 0 N e w Hampsh i r e 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 3 0 N e w Jerse y 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 11 1 N e w Me xic o 33 0 0 0 0 3 6 7 7 9 1 0 Ne w York 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 41 11 4 N o r t h Carolin a 100 0 0 0 0 0 2 25 36 28 6 3 N o r t h Dakota 53 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 13 31 2 2 Northe rn Mari an a Isl 4 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ohi o 88 0 0 0 0 0 5 13 20 47 2 1 O k l a h o m a 77 0 0 0 0 9 18 22 17 10 0 1 Oreg on 36 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 13 15 0 0 P e n n s yl v a n i a 67 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 12 36 8 4 P u e r t o Rico 78 0 0 0 2 18 26 27 1 4 0 0 R h o d e Islan d 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 S o u t h Caroli n a 46 0 0 0 0 4 10 7 14 9 2 0 S o u t h Dakot a 66 0 0 0 1 2 3 12 21 24 3 0 T e n n e s s e e 95 0 0 0 1 8 20 31 26 8 1 0 Texas 254 0 0 2 1 21 46 64 59 51 7 3 U t a h 29 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 8 14 4 0 V e r m o n t 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 3 0 V i r g i n Isla n d s 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 V i rg i n i a 134 0 0 3 7 12 18 24 30 26 1 4 0 W a s h i n g t o n 39 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 5 23 3 0 W e s t Virgi n i a 55 0 0 0 0 1 6 16 20 12 0 0 W i s c o n s i n 72 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 14 46 5 0 W yo m i n g 23 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 6 11 1 0 Total 3,232 4 12 17 42 16 2 3 4 7 644 753 1 0 3 8 1 7 1 4 2 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. See Technical Notes at the end of the re port. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI (Connections); Geolyt ic s 2010 Block- L e ve l Estimat es (Househ o l d s for U.S. and Distric t of Columb i a) ; Cens us 2000 (House h o l ds for Puerto Rico, America n Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and U.S. Virgin Islands). U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 58 42 Table 29 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households State Tracts Zero Greater than 0 and no more than 5% Greater than 5 and no more than 10% Greater than 10 and no more than 20% Greater than 20 and no more than 30% Greater than 30 and no more than 40% Greater than 40 and no more than 50% Greater than 50 and no more than 60% Greater than 60 and no more than 80% Greater than 80 and no more than 100% 100% or more A l a b a m a 1,081 0 5 4 54 122 2 0 8 192 143 1 9 8 9 3 6 2 A l a s k a 158 2 0 2 9 7 5 15 15 53 3 6 1 4 A m e r i c a n Samoa 21 5 10 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 A r i z o n a 1,107 15 10 16 53 8 5 1 0 9 144 166 2 5 4 1 2 7 1 2 8 A r k a n s a s 624 1 2 6 33 94 12 4 120 96 82 3 8 2 8 C a l i f o r n i a 7,049 41 15 13 115 2 4 8 4 3 1 743 895 2 , 0 2 6 1 , 5 1 5 1 , 0 0 7 C o l o r a d o 1,075 15 1 0 8 36 70 129 167 2 9 6 1 8 1 1 7 2 C o n n e c t i c u t 815 3 0 0 0 17 30 52 76 234 2 9 5 1 0 8 D e l a w a r e 197 1 0 1 6 17 19 24 20 29 2 6 5 4 D i s t ri c t of Colum b i a 188 7 1 1 0 5 12 23 17 70 2 6 2 6 F l o r i d a 3,153 9 5 5 33 123 2 7 0 401 449 8 0 7 5 0 4 5 4 7 G e o r g i a 1,618 11 56 27 83 1 5 6 1 8 4 198 191 3 1 3 1 9 7 2 0 2 Guam 56 9 0 0 1 2 3 1 2 7 7 24 H a wa i i 286 7 1 0 1 5 2 13 30 112 7 6 3 9 I d a h o 280 1 3 1 6 12 41 59 50 58 2 3 2 6 I l l i n o is 2,964 16 7 9 53 181 3 4 4 379 425 8 6 2 4 2 9 2 5 9 I n d i a n a 1,412 3 5 3 26 86 20 2 242 254 3 5 9 1 3 9 9 3 I o w a 793 2 1 0 2 15 45 120 199 3 0 6 7 0 3 3 K a n s a s 727 7 2 0 6 23 73 120 132 2 2 0 7 8 6 6 K e n t u c k y 994 2 4 4 30 79 12 8 183 190 2 2 9 8 8 5 7 L o u i s i a n a 1,106 6 3 5 38 133 1 6 4 186 155 2 5 8 1 1 1 4 7 M a i n e 344 0 0 0 0 3 10 27 42 156 7 2 3 4 M a r yl a n d 1,216 6 3 5 49 81 90 94 115 28 9 2 3 6 2 4 8 M a s s a c h u s e t t s 1,361 5 0 1 8 71 111 110 118 2 8 5 3 7 4 2 7 8 M i c h i g a n 2,716 16 5 7 108 21 1 2 5 4 305 365 7 3 7 4 5 9 2 4 9 M i n n e s o t a 1,300 6 1 3 8 33 80 154 242 4 3 7 2 1 4 1 2 2 M i s s is s i p p i 605 0 0 7 43 132 1 5 0 88 63 75 2 5 2 2 M i s s o u r i 1,320 10 3 9 43 125 1 7 6 201 230 2 8 4 1 5 3 8 6 M o n t a n a 270 6 4 1 6 6 22 36 55 95 2 0 1 9 N e b r a s k a 503 3 2 0 2 12 43 86 103 15 1 5 3 4 8 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 59 43 Table 29 - Continued Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households State Tracts Zero Greater than 0 and no more than 5% Greater than 5 and no more than 10% Greater than 10 and no more than 20% Greater than 20 and no more than 30% Greater than 30 and no more than 40% Greater than 40 and no more than 50% Greater than 50 and no more than 60% Greater than 60 and no more than 80% Greater than 80 and no more than 100% 100% or more N e v a d a 487 9 3 9 27 45 71 66 51 91 5 7 5 8 N e w Hampsh i r e 272 0 0 0 1 0 6 12 24 105 7 8 4 6 N e w Jerse y 1,944 14 2 2 32 79 1 1 6 139 183 4 0 5 4 7 6 4 9 6 N e w Me xic o 456 18 10 6 17 34 5 3 76 61 96 4 0 4 5 Ne w York 4,898 98 3 8 41 230 4 3 3 640 711 1 , 0 6 3 8 0 3 8 6 8 N o r t h Carolin a 1,555 2 2 3 34 81 19 8 258 270 3 5 0 1 8 3 1 7 4 N o r t h Dakota 227 6 0 1 1 9 13 31 25 102 2 9 1 0 Northe rn Mari an a Isl 21 1 2 0 8 4 3 1 0 2 0 0 Ohi o 2,934 13 1 6 53 195 2 7 9 343 451 8 8 7 4 8 5 2 2 1 O k l a h o m a 990 5 11 12 53 88 1 3 4 190 141 1 9 1 9 4 7 1 Oreg on 755 1 0 1 1 14 47 91 174 25 4 1 1 9 5 3 P e n n s yl v a n i a 3,134 34 24 6 113 2 4 3 2 6 6 256 333 7 2 8 5 9 7 5 3 4 P u e r t o Rico 823 9 42 39 144 1 6 8 1 1 7 111 57 61 2 8 4 7 R h o d e Islan d 233 0 0 1 3 28 25 17 13 37 4 3 6 6 S o u t h Caroli n a 867 4 1 2 43 98 16 3 133 111 1 5 4 7 3 8 5 S o u t h Dakot a 235 16 1 3 9 6 22 36 41 81 1 6 4 T e n n e s s e e 1,261 8 3 13 69 137 2 2 4 235 177 2 2 6 9 0 7 9 Texas 4,388 24 20 45 213 4 7 6 6 5 7 618 628 8 0 1 4 2 7 4 7 9 U t a h 496 7 4 1 7 8 27 49 94 149 7 7 7 3 V e r m o n t 179 0 0 0 0 1 6 13 27 73 3 9 2 0 V i r g i n Isla n d s 32 0 0 3 8 6 6 5 2 1 1 0 V i rg i n i a 1,530 5 6 18 58 102 1 3 6 188 196 3 5 0 2 5 0 2 2 1 W a s h i n g t o n 1,318 2 0 1 18 31 76 152 180 4 4 0 2 5 3 1 6 5 W e s t Virgi n i a 466 0 6 8 17 31 48 79 93 119 4 9 1 6 W i s c o n s i n 1,320 8 1 1 11 56 88 154 254 4 7 4 1 8 0 9 3 W yo m i n g 127 1 0 0 4 2 9 10 28 55 1 3 5 Total 66,287 500 291 320 1 , 8 1 0 4 , 2 9 3 6 , 6 2 3 8,348 9, 3 3 1 1 6 , 5 7 8 1 0 , 1 6 5 8 , 0 2 8 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI (Connections); Geolyt ic s 2010 Block- L e ve l Estimat es (Househ o l d s for U.S. and Distric t of Columb i a) ; Cens us 2000 (House h o l ds for Puerto Rico, America n Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and U.S. Virgin Islands). U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 60 SymbologyConnections per 1000 HouseholdsZeroZero < x <= 200200 < x <= 400400 < x <= 600600 < x <= 800800 < x Map 1Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction per 1,000 Householdsby Census Tract as of June 30, 2011 P u e r t o R i c or t i H a w a i ii i A l a s k al This map shows the number of residential connections per 1,000 households bycensus tract. Connections have information transfer rates greater than 200 kbpsin at least one direction and include all technologies except terrestrial mobile wireless. Connections data are from FCC Form 477 Part VI. The census tract boundaries are from ESRI.Household counts for tracts in the U.S. are 2010 estimates from Geolytics. Household countsfor the territories are from Census 2000. For more information about census tracts please seeCensus 2000 Summary File 3 Technical Documentation, page A-11. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 61 SymbologyConnections per 1000 HouseholdsZeroZero < x <= 200200 < x <= 400400 < x <= 600600 < x <= 800800 < x Map 2Residential Fixed Connections at Least 768 kbps Downstream and 200 kbps Upstreamper 1,000 Households by Census Tract as of June 30, 2011 P u e r t o R i c or t i H a w a i ii i A l a s k al This map shows the number of residential connections per 1,000 householdsby census tract. Connections have information transfer rates greater than 200 kbpsupstream and at least 768 kbps downstream. All technologies except terrestrialmobile wireless are included. Connections are from FCC Form 477 Part VI. The census tract boundaries are from ESRI.Household counts for tracts in the U.S. are 2010 estimates from Geolytics. Householdcounts for the territories are from Census 2000. For more information about censustracts please see Census 2000 Summary File 3 Technical Documentation, page A-11. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 62 SymbologyProvider Count (exc. Mobile Wireless)Zero1 to 34 to 67 or more Map 3Providers of Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Directionby Census Tract as of June 30, 2011 P u e r t o R i c or t i H a w a i ii i A l a s k al This map shows the number of providers of fixed connectionsby census tract. Connections have information transfer ratesgreater than 200 kbps in at least one direction and include alltechnologies except terrestrial mobile wireless. Provider data are from FCC Form 477 Part VI. The census tractboundaries are from ESRI. For more information about censustracts please see Census 2000 Summary File 3 TechnicalDocumentation, page A-11. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 63 SymbologyProvider Count (exc. Mobile Wireless)Zero1 to 34 to 67 or more Map 4Providers of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Census Tract as of June 30, 2011 P u e r t o R i c or t i H a w a i ii i A l a s k al This map shows the number of providers of fixed connections bycensus tract. A provider is counted only if it reported residentialconnections in the tract. Connections have information transferrates greater than 200 kbps in at least one direction and includeall technologies except terrestrial mobile wireless. Provider data are from FCC Form 477 Part VI. The census tractboundaries are from ESRI. For more information about censustracts please see Census 2000 Summary File 3 TechnicalDocumentation, page A-11. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 64 SymbologyProvider Count (exc. Mobile Wireless)Zero1 to 34 to 67 or more Map 5Providers of Residential Fixed Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstreamby Census Tract as of June 30, 2011 P u e r t o R i c or t i H a w a i ii i A l a s k al This map shows the number of providers of fixed connections by census tract.A provider is counted only if it reported residential connections in the tract.Connections have information transfer rates of at least 3 mbps downstreamand at least 768 kbps upstream and include all technologies except terrestrial mobilewireless. Provider data are from FCC Form 477 Part VI. The census tract boundariesare from ESRI. For more information about census tracts please see Census2000 Summary File 3 Technical Documentation, page A-11. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 65 SymbologyProviders (Mobile Wireless)Zero1 to 34 to 67 or more Map 6Providers of Mobile Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Directionby Census Tract as of June 30, 2011 P u e r t o R i c or t i H a w a i ii i A l a s k al This map shows the number of potential providers of mobile connectionswith information transfer rates greater than 200 kbps in at least one direction bycensus tract. Providers are counted if they indicate that service is available ina tract over a network the provider operates. Provider data are from FCC Form 477 Part VI. The census tract boundaries arefrom ESRI. For more information about census tracts please see Census 2000Summary File 3 Technical Documentation, page A-11. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 66 Detailed Correlation Results: Demographic Measures Contents of this section Household income Chart 17 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Income Deciles as of June 30, 2011 (County Data) .............................68 Chart 18 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Income Deciles as of June 30, 2011 .....................69 Household density Chart 19 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Density Deciles as of June 30, 2011 (County Data).............................70 Chart 20 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Density Deciles as of June 30, 2011.....................71 E ducation Chart 21 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Share of College Graduates in Deciles as of June 30, 2011 (County Data) ....................................................................................................................72 Chart 22 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Share of Population with a College Degree (in Deciles) as of June 30, 2011 ........................................................................................73 Age Chart 23 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Average Age in Decile s as of June 30, 2011 (County Data) ................74 Chart 24 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Average Age of County Population (in Deciles) as of June 30, 2011 .......................................................................................75 Race Chart 25 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connecti ons over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Share White Alone in D eciles as of June 30, 2011 (County Data).......76 Chart 26 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Share White Alone (in Deciles) as of June 30, 2011 ............................................................................................................77 Technology and household density Chart 27 Subscribership Ratios by Technology and Tract Household Density as of June 30, 2011 (Residential fixed connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) ....78 Income and household density Chart 28 Average Subscribership Ratios by Income and Household Density as of June 30, 2011 (Residential fixed connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction by Tract) ............................................................................................................................79 Chart 29 Median Ratios of Residential Fixe d Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Income and De nsity, Tract Data as of June 30, 2011 ...........80 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 67 44 Chart 17 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Income Deciles as of June 30, 2011 (County Data) S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (Me d ian ho us e ho ld in c o m e in 1 9 9 9 ). o ne d ire c tio n ac ro s s all c o untie s in d e c ile N and all d e c ile s le s s than N to the num b e r o f ho us e ho ld s in all the c o untie s in d e c ile N and d e c ile s le s s than N. d e c ile to the s um o f ho us e ho ld s ac ro s s c o untie s in the d e c ile . T he he ig ht o f the b lue , c um ulative b ar f o r d e c ile N re p re s e nts the ratio o f the s um o f re s id e ntial f ixe d c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t C e ns us B ure au. Fo r e ac h d e c ile , the he ig ht o f any re d , no n-c um ulative b ar re p re s e nts the ratio o f the s um o f re s id e ntial f ixe d c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n ac ro s s c o untie s in the T his c hart s ho ws c um ulative and no n-c um ulative s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio s b y inc o m e d e c ile s . Co untie s we re g ro up e d into inc o m e d e c i le s b as e d o n c o unty m e d ian ho us e ho ld inc o m e in 1 9 9 9 , as re p o rte d b y the Lower Income Counties Ranked by Median Household Income, in Deciles Higher Income Cumulati ve Not Cumulati ve 0. 41 0. 41 0. 45 0. 49 0. 47 0. 49 0. 49 0. 53 0. 51 0. 57 0. 54 0. 60 0. 56 0. 63 0. 59 0. 65 0. 62 0. 68 0. 67 0. 78 S u b s c r i b e r s h i p R a t i o 0. 00 0. 10 0. 20 0. 30 0. 40 0. 50 0. 60 0. 70 0. 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 68 45 Max Q 1 Q 3 Median Min Chart 18 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Income Deciles as of June 30, 2011 S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (Me d ian ho us e ho ld in c o m e in 1 9 9 9 ). o b s e rvatio n b e lo w Q 3 +1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ); and is any d ata p o int b e yo nd Q 1 -1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ) o r Q 3 +1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ). R atio s g re ate r than 1 we re s e t to 1 . b ut no te als o that + d e no te s the p o s itio n o f the ave rag e re s id e ntial s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio take n ac ro s s all c o untie s in the d e c il e ; is the m inim um o b s e rvatio n ab o ve Q 1 -1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ); T is the maxim um No te : E ac h b o x p lo t s ho ws the d is trib utio n o f re s id e ntial s ub s c rib e rs hip to c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n f o r c o untie s in the inc o m e d e c ile . S o m e o f the f e ature s are lab e le d , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 S u b s c r i b e r s h i p R a t i o Lower Income Median Household Income in 1999 by Decile Higher Income S u b s c ri b e rs h i p Rat i o A ve ra ge 0 . 3 9 M e d i an 0 . 3 8 0 . 4 5 0 . 4 5 0 . 48 0 . 47 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 54 0 . 53 0 . 5 7 0 . 5 7 0 . 5 7 0 . 5 9 0 . 60 0 . 61 0 . 6 4 0 . 6 4 0 . 7 5 0 . 7 5 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 69 46 Chart 19 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Density Deciles as of June 30, 2011 (County Data) S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (C o unty land are a). f ixe d c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n ac ro s s all c o untie s in d e c ile N and all d e c ile s le s s than N to the nu m b e r o f ho us e ho ld s in all the c o untie s in d e c ile N and d e c ile s le s s than N. in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n ac ro s s c o untie s in the d e c ile to the s um o f ho us e ho ld s ac ro s s c o untie s in the d e c ile . T he he ig ht o f the b lue , c umulative b ar f o r d e c ile N re p re s e nts the ratio o f the s um o f re s id e ntial c o unty ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 to c o unty land are a f ro m the C e ns us B ure au. F o r e ac h d e c ile , the he ig ht o f any re d , no n-c um ulative b a r re p re s e nts the ratio o f the s um o f re s id e ntial f ixe d c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s T his c hart s ho ws c um ulative and no n-c um ulative s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio s b y d e ns ity d e c ile s . C o untie s we re g ro up e d into d e ns ity d e c ile s b as e d o n ho us e ho ld s p e r s q uare m ile , c alc ulate d as the ratio o f e s tim ate d Lower Density Counties Ranked by Household Density, in Deciles Higher Density Cumulati ve Not Cumulati ve 0. 56 0. 56 0. 56 0. 56 0. 55 0. 53 0. 53 0. 51 0. 53 0. 52 0. 54 0. 55 0. 55 0. 59 0. 58 0. 63 0. 62 0. 69 0. 67 0. 71 S u b s c r i b e r s h i p R a t i o 0. 00 0. 10 0. 20 0. 30 0. 40 0. 50 0. 60 0. 70 0. 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 70 47 Max Q 1 Q 3 Median Min Chart 20 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Density Deciles as of June 30, 2011 S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (C o unty land are a). o b s e rvatio n b e lo w Q 3 +1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ); and is any d ata p o int b e yo nd Q 1 -1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ) o r Q 3 +1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ). R atio s g re ate r than 1 we re s e t to 1 . b ut no te als o that + d e no te s the p o s itio n o f the ave rag e re s id e ntial s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio take n ac ro s s all c o untie s in the d e c i le ; is the m inim um o b s e rvatio n ab o ve Q 1 -1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ); T is the maxim um No te : E ac h b o x p lo t s ho ws the d is trib utio n o f re s id e ntial s ub s c rib e rs hip to c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n f o r c o untie s in the d e ns ity d e c ile . S o m e o f the f e ature s are lab e le d , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 S u b s c r i b e r s h i p R a t i o Lower Density County Household Density by Decile Higher Density S u b s c ri b e rs h i p Rat i o A ve ra ge 0 . 5 5 M e d i an 0 . 5 5 0 . 5 4 0 . 5 4 0 . 48 0 . 49 0 . 4 7 0 . 4 7 0 . 48 0 . 48 0 . 5 2 0 . 5 1 0 . 5 5 0 . 5 3 0 . 60 0 . 59 0 . 6 6 0 . 6 7 0 . 6 4 0 . 6 8 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 71 48 Chart 21 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Share of College Graduates in Deciles as of June 30, 2011 (County Data) S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (C o unty e d uc atio nal attainm e nt). re s id e ntial f ixe d c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n ac ro s s all c o untie s in d e c ile N and all d e c ile s le s s than N, to the numb e r o f ho us e ho ld s in all the c o untie s in d e c ile N and d e c ile s le s s than N. 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n ac ro s s c o untie s in the d e c ile to the s um o f ho us e ho ld s ac ro s s c o untie s in the d e c ile . T he h e ig ht o f the b lue , c um ulative b ar f o r d e c ile N re p re s e nts the ratio o f the s um o f le as t 2 5 ye ars o f ag e with a c o lle g e d e g re e o r hig he r e d uc atio nal attainm e nt. F o r e ac h d e c ile , the he ig ht o f any re d , no n-c um u lative b ar re p re s e nts the ratio o f the s um o f re s id e ntial f ixe d c o nne c tio ns o ve r T his c hart s ho ws c um ulative and no n-c um ulative s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio s b y c o unty s hare o f c o lle g e g rad uate s in d e c ile s . C o untie s we re g ro up e d into d e c ile s b as e d o n the s hare o f the c o unty p o p ulatio n at Lower Share Counties Ranked by Share of College Graduates, in Deciles Higher Share Cumulati ve Not Cumulati ve 0. 44 0. 44 0. 47 0. 50 0. 48 0. 50 0. 49 0. 51 0. 51 0. 57 0. 53 0. 60 0. 56 0. 63 0. 58 0. 64 0. 62 0. 68 0. 67 0. 75 S u b s c r i b e r s h i p R a t i o 0. 00 0. 10 0. 20 0. 30 0. 40 0. 50 0. 60 0. 70 0. 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 72 49 Max Q 1 Q 3 Median Min Chart 22 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Share of Population with a College Degree (in Deciles) as of June 30, 2011 S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (C o unty e d uc atio nal attainm e nt). o b s e rvatio n b e lo w Q 3 +1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ); and is a d ata p o int b e yo nd Q 1 -1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ) o r Q3 +1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ). R atio s g re ate r than 1 we re s e t to 1 . b ut no te als o that + d e no te s the p o s itio n o f the ave rag e re s id e ntial s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio take n ac ro s s all c o untie s in the d e c i le ; is the m inim um o b s e rvatio n ab o ve Q 1 -1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ); T is the maxim um No te : E ac h b o x p lo t s ho ws the d is trib utio n o f re s id e ntial s ub s c rib e rs hip to c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n f o r c o untie s in the s hare d e c ile . S o m e o f the f e ature s are lab e le d , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 S u b s c r i b e r s h i p R a t i o Lower Share County Share of College Graduates by Decile Higher Share S u b s c ri b e rs h i p Rat i o A ve ra ge 0 . 4 0 M e d i an 0 . 4 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 4 5 0 . 47 0 . 46 0 . 4 9 0 . 4 9 0 . 53 0 . 53 0 . 5 6 0 . 5 7 0 . 5 8 0 . 5 9 0 . 61 0 . 62 0 . 6 6 0 . 6 7 0 . 7 4 0 . 7 4 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 73 50 Chart 23 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Average Age in Deciles as of June 30, 2011 (County Data) S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (C o unty ave rag e ag e ) . ac ro s s all c o untie s in d e c ile N and all d e c ile s le s s than N, to the num b e r o f ho us e ho ld s in all the c o untie s in d e c ile N and d e c ile s le s s than N. ho us e ho ld s ac ro s s c o untie s in the d e c ile . T he he ig ht o f the b lue , c umulative b ar f o r d e c ile N re p re s e nts the ratio o f the s um o f re s id e ntial f ixe d c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n d e c ile , the he ig ht o f any re d , no n-c um ulative b ar re p re s e nts the ratio o f the s um o f re s id e ntial f ixe d c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n ac ro s s c o untie s in the d e c ile to the s um o f T his c hart s ho ws c um ulative and no n-c um ulative s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio s b y c o unty ave rag e ag e in d e c ile s . C o untie s we re g ro up e d i nto d e c ile s b as e d o n the ave rag e ag e o f the c o unty p o p ulatio n. Fo r e ac h Lower Average Age Counties Ranked by Average Age, in Deciles Higher Average Age Cumulati ve Not Cumulati ve 0. 68 0. 68 0. 68 0. 69 0. 68 0. 66 0. 68 0. 67 0. 67 0. 67 0. 67 0. 66 0. 67 0. 66 0. 67 0. 63 0. 67 0. 61 0. 67 0. 70 S u b s c r i b e r s h i p R a t i o 0. 00 0. 10 0. 20 0. 30 0. 40 0. 50 0. 60 0. 70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 74 51 Max Q 1 Q 3 Median Min Chart 24 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Average Age of County Population (in Deciles) as of June 30, 2011 S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (C o unty ave rag e ag e ) . o b s e rvatio n b e lo w Q 3 +1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ); and is a d ata p o int b e yo nd Q 1 -1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ) o r Q3 +1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ). R atio s g re ate r than 1 we re s e t to 1 . b ut no te als o that + d e no te s the p o s itio n o f the ave rag e re s id e ntial s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio take n ac ro s s all c o untie s in the d e c i le ; is the m inim um o b s e rvatio n ab o ve Q 1 -1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ); T is the maxim um No te : E ac h b o x p lo t s ho ws the d is trib utio n o f re s id e ntial s ub s c rib e rs hip to c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n f o r c o untie s in the ave rag e ag e d e c ile . So m e o f the f e ature s are lab e le d , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 S u b s c r i b e r s h i p R a t i o Lower Average Age County Average Age by Decile Higher Average Age S u b s c ri b e rs h i p Rat i o A ve ra ge 0 . 5 6 M e d i an 0 . 5 9 0 . 5 8 0 . 6 0 0 . 55 0 . 57 0 . 5 4 0 . 5 5 0 . 55 0 . 55 0 . 5 3 0 . 5 3 0 . 5 3 0 . 5 2 0 . 53 0 . 53 0 . 5 5 0 . 5 4 0 . 5 8 0 . 5 8 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 75 52 Chart 25 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Share White Alone in Deciles as of June 30, 2011 (County Data) S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (R ac e ). o ne d ire c tio n ac ro s s all c o untie s in d e c ile N and all d e c ile s le s s than N, to the num b e r o f ho us e ho ld s in all the c o untie s in d e c ile N and d e c ile s le s s than N. in the d e c ile to the s um o f ho us e ho ld s ac ro s s c o untie s in the d e c ile . The he ig ht o f the b lue , c um ulative b ar f o r d e c ile N re p r e s e nts the ratio o f the s um o f re s id e ntial f ixe d c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t re p o rte d the ir rac e as white alo ne . F o r e ac h d e c ile ,the he ig ht o f any re d , no n-c um ulative b ar re p re s e nts the ratio o f the s um o f re s id e ntial f ixe d c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n ac ro s s c o untie s T his c hart s ho ws c um ulative and no n-c um ulative s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio s b y the s hare o f c o unty p o p ulatio n white alo ne in d e c ile s . Co untie s we re g ro up e d into d e c ile s b as e d o n the s hare o f the c o unty p o p ulatio n that Lower Share Counties Ranked by Share of Population White, in Deciles Higher Share Cumulati ve Not Cumulati ve 0. 64 0. 64 0. 66 0. 69 0. 67 0. 67 0. 68 0. 72 0. 68 0. 68 0. 68 0. 68 0. 68 0. 67 0. 67 0. 64 0. 67 0. 60 0. 67 0. 56 S u b s c r i b e r s h i p R a t i o 0. 00 0. 10 0. 20 0. 30 0. 40 0. 50 0. 60 0. 70 0. 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 76 53 Max Q 1 Q 3 Median Min Chart 26 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Share White Alone (in Deciles) as of June 30, 2011 S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (R ac e ). is a d ata p o int b e yo nd Q 1 -1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ) o r Q 3 +1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ). R atio s g re ate r than 1 we re s e t to 1 . re s id e ntial s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio take n ac ro s s all c o untie s in the d e c ile ; is the m inim um o b s e rvatio n ab o ve Q 1 -1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ); T is the m axim um o b s e rvatio n b e lo w Q 3 +1 .5 (Q 3 -Q 1 ); and d e c ile s b as e d o n the s hare o f the c o unty p o p ulatio n that re p o rte d the ir rac e as white alo ne . So m e o f the f e ature s are lab e le d , b ut no te als o that + d e no te s the p o s itio n o f the ave rag e No te : E ac h b o x p lo t s ho ws the d is trib utio n o f re s id e ntial s ub s c rib e rs hip to c o nne c tio ns o ve r 2 0 0 kb p s in at le as t o ne d ire c tio n f o r c o untie s in e ac h rac e d e c ile . C o untie s we re g ro up e d into 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 S u b s c r i b e r s h i p R a t i o Lower Share County Share White Alone by Decile Higher Share S u b s c ri b e rs h i p Rat i o A ve ra ge 0 . 4 3 M e d i an 0 . 4 2 0 . 5 1 0 . 5 0 0 . 53 0 . 53 0 . 5 8 0 . 5 8 0 . 58 0 . 58 0 . 5 9 0 . 5 9 0 . 5 8 0 . 5 7 0 . 59 0 . 59 0 . 5 6 0 . 5 5 0 . 5 5 0 . 5 4 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 77 54 Low est Densit y Highes t Dens it y Chart 27 Subscribership Ratios by Technology and Tract Household Density as of June 30, 2011 (Residential fixed connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (T rac t land are a). c o nne c tio ns to ho us e ho ld s ac ro s s trac ts in the p e rc e ntile . e s tim ate d trac t ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 to trac t land are a f ro m the Ce ns us B ure au. F o r e ac h p e rc e ntile , the he ig ht o f the b ar re p re s e nts the ho us e ho ld -we ig hte d ave rag e ratio o f re s id e ntial f ixe d T his c hart s ho ws s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio s b y te c hno lo g y and ho us e ho ld d e ns ity. T rac ts we re g ro up e d into 1 0 0 d e ns ity p e rc e ntile s b as e d o n ho us e ho ld s p e r s q uare m ile , c alc ulate d as the ratio o f aD S L C able M o dem FT T P S atelli te Fi xed W i reles s P e r c e n t a g e o f R e s i d e n t i a l F i x e d H i g h - S p e e d C o n n e c t i o n s 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 78 55 Ric hes t Poor es t Low es t Dens it y Highes t Dens it y 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Chart 28 Average Subscribership Ratios by Income and Household Density as of June 30, 2011 (Residential fixed connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction by Tract) S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (T rac t land are a, Me d ian ho us e ho ld inc o m e ). re s id e ntial f ixe d c o nne c tio ns to ho us e ho ld s ac ro s s trac ts in the d e c ile . e s tim ate d trac t ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 to trac t land are a f ro m the Ce ns us B ure au, and me d ian ho us e ho ld inc o m e . F o r e ac h q uantile , t he he ig ht o f the b ar re p re s e nts the ho us e ho ld -we ig hte d ave rag e ratio o f T his c hart s ho ws s ub s c rib e rs hip ratio s b y ho us e ho ld d e ns ity and inc o m e q uantile s . Trac ts we re g ro up e d into 4 0 0 d e ns ity/inc o m e q uantile s b as e d o n ho us e ho ld s p e r s q uare m ile , c alc ulate d as the ratio o f U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 79 56 M e d i a n R a t i o o f C o n n e c t i o n s t o H o u s e h o l d s 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100 % Lower Density Tract Density (Households per Square Mile) in Deciles Higher Density 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 Chart 29 Median Ratios of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Income and Density Tract Data as of June 30, 2011 S o urc e s : F C C F o rm 4 7 7 , P art V I ; G e o lytic s 2 0 1 0 B lo c k-L e ve l E s tim ate s (Ho us e ho ld s in 2 0 1 0 ); and C e ns us 2 0 0 0 (Me d ian ho us e ho ld in c o m e in 1 9 9 9 ). Trac t Med ian In com e in Deciles l e s s tha n $22 , 90 7 $ 2 2, 9 0 7 to $28, 2 4 5 $ 2 8 ,2 4 5 to $32, 0 0 4 $ 3 2, 0 0 4 to $35, 6 9 9 $ 3 5, 6 9 9 to $39, 6 1 5 $ 3 9 ,6 1 5 to $43, 8 5 9 $ 4 3, 8 5 9 to $49, 7 5 0 $ 4 9, 7 5 0 to $57, 2 8 1 $ 5 7 ,2 8 1 to $70, 1 3 6 m o re tha n $70, 1 3 6 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 80 Technical Notes General Detailed information about FCC Form 477 reporting requirements is available at www.fcc.gov/form477. Wherever a number of providers is cited in this report, multiple Form 477 filers within a holding company structure count as one provider. Form 477 collects information about Internet access connections in service to end-user locations that are advertised to deliver information to and/or from the end user – that is, in at least one direction – at transfer rates (“speeds”) above 200 kilobits per second (kbps). Information is collected about connections in 72 speed tiers (nine upstream tiers and eight downstream) defined by ranges of upstream speeds and downstream speeds. Connections are further categorized by the technology employed by the part of the connection that terminates at the end-user location. “End users” are residential, business, institutional, or government entities who use services for their own purposes and who do not resell such services to other entities. Facilities-based providers report information about connections they provide directly to their own end-user customers and also connections that they provide to Internet Service Providers for resale to end users. For Form 477 purposes, the facilities-based provider of a connection is the entity that owns the portion of the physical facility that terminates at the end-user location, obtains an unbundled network element (UNE), special access line, or other leased facility that terminates at the end-user location and provisions/equips it as a connection that transfers information at rates over 200 kbps in at l east one direction, or provisions/equips a wireless channel that transfers information at rates over 200 kbps in at least one direction to the end-user location over licensed spectrum or over spectrum that the provider uses on an unlicensed basis. The mutually exclusive Form 477 technology categories are: asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (“aDSL” in this report), symmetric Digital Subscriber Line (“sDSL”), other wireline, cable modem, optical fiber to the end-user premises (“FTTP”), satellite, fixed wireless (using licensed or unlicensed spectrum), mobile wireless (using licensed or unlicensed spectrum), electric power line, and all other (which is included to capture deployment of additional technologies over time). In the Form 477 data collection, aDSL-based services delivered over fiber-to-the-node architecture are reported in the aDSL category. The other wireline category comprises T1/DS1, T3/DS3, and other copper-based connections, not elsewhere categorized, that deliver Internet access service at the end-user location. Ethernet connections delivering Internet access service are reported in the other wireline category if the connection terminates over copper and in the FTTP category if the connection terminates over fiber. Connections deployed over hybrid fiber-coax (HFC) architecture are reported in the cable modem category. Wireless ISPs (“WISPs”) report in the fixed wireless category if providing service to dispersed, fixed end-user locations and report in the mobile wireless category if providing a commercial service that can be received at any location within a service footprint. Wireless local area networks (such as Wi-Fi hotspots) that only enable local distribution and sharing of a premises connection are not included, although the shared premises connection is included. Numbers of connections presented in this report are not adjusted for the number of persons at a single end-user location who have access to, or who use, the Internet access services delivered over the connection to that location. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 81 Numbers of residential connections are estimate d based on the total connections and percentage- residential connections information reported on Form 477. Census tracts Starting with data as of December 31, 2008, facilities-based providers of reportable fixed-location Internet access connections must report connection counts and percentage residential information at the census tract level of detail. Because of the inherent mobility of their service, facilities-based mobile wireless providers do not report subscriber counts by census tract. Instead, they report the census tracts in the state that best represent the areas where service is available over the provider’s own network, for each of the speed tiers in which the provider offers service. The census tract-level data summarized in this report were collected for tracts in the 2000 decennial census. For that census, the Census Bureau assigned a default census tract code of 000000 to some coastal and Great Lakes water and territorial sea. These default-code tracts are not included in the statistics presented in this report, which therefore summarize data for 66,287 census tracts. According to GeoLytics, Inc. estimates for 2010, about 200 census tracts have population but no households because the population resides in group living quarters. For the purpose of estimating residential subscribership rates by census tract, we assume these census tracts have no reportable residential Internet access service because persons residing in group quarters would have Internet access over a business connection provided to the operator of the group quarters. Therefore, these census tracts are included in the “zero” column. Decline in reported mobile wireless connections between June 2008 and December 2008 Changed reporting instructions starting in December 2008 caused a one-time decrease in the reported number of mobile wireless Internet access service connections, from about 60 million in June 2008 to about 25 million in December 2008. For reporting periods through June 30, 2008, Form 477 had instructed mobile wireless providers to report the number of subscribers whose mobile device (such as a wireless modem laptop card, smartphone, or handset) was capable of sending or receiving data at speeds above 200 kbps. The Commission found these instru ctions insufficiently precise to enable it to determine, from the reported data, the number of subscribers making regular use of Internet access service above 200 kbps as part of their mobile service pack age. Starting with the December 31, 2008 data, therefore, Form 477 requires mobile wireless providers to report the number of subscribers that have a capable device (as discussed above) for which the subscription includes a data plan for transferring, on a monthly basis, either a specified or an unlimited amount of data to and from Internet sites of the subscriber’s choice, and excluding subscribers whose choice of content is restricted to only customized- for-mobile content (for example, text and multimedi a messaging, or the capacity to download ringtones and games). Starting with the December 31, 2008, data, providers also must report, explicitly and separately, total subscribers with a device capable of sending or receiving data at speeds above 200 kbps, irrespective of the service plan purchased. The number of such devices reported for December 2008 was about 86 million. That figure is not directly comparable to mobile wireless connections reported for June 2008 or earlier reporting periods, however, because individual providers – to a varying and largely unknown degree – included or excluded subscribers with service plans for less than full Internet access in the earlier data. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 82 Finally, the Form 477 modifications adopted for the December 31, 2008, and later, data specify how mobile wireless providers should distinguish between residential subscribers and other subscribers, and some of these providers consequently reported a larg er share of residential subscribers than they had reported for earlier dates. Ratios of residential fixed-location connections to households that exceed 100% Starting with data as of December 31, 2008, information about connections over fixed-location technologies must be reported for individual census tracts. This allows us to estimate the share of households with fixed-location connections in individual census tracts by taking the ratio of the reported number of fixed-location residential service connections to the estimated number of households. In the year-end 2009 data, we continue to find “outlier” estimates at or above 100% and to find that the number of outliers is substantially reduced when estimates are made for individual counties rather than for individual census tracts. Possible explanations of ratios at or above 100% incl ude (1) geocoding misallocations of service locations to census tracts; (2) proper allocation of connections to the county level by some filers, but improper allocation of all connections to a single tract in the county; (3) possible overestimation of residential connections in service plans for which the customer base is primarily residential; and (4) connections at seasonally or occasionally occupied housing units, such as vacation homes, while the household is counted elsewhere. The numbers of households in census tracts that were used to generate the estimated ratios are themselves estimates (for 2010, from GeoLytics, Inc.), which could have an independent effect. Maps showing number of providers by census tract Readers of previous reports in this series may note certain differences in the provider-count maps in this report as compared to maps for June 30, 2008 and earlier dates, which showed the number of providers by 5-digit geographical ZIP Code. The ZIP Code-based maps counted (at the holding company level) each provider with any fixed-location connect ions (wired, terrestrial fixed wireless, or satellite) reported for the ZIP Code and also any mobile wireless service provider who listed the ZIP Code as part of its service area. By contrast, in this report we provide separate maps for providers (counted at the holding company level) of fixed-location connections and for mobile wireless providers. Also, we present maps showing the number of providers that reported any residential fixed-location connections, thereby excluding any providers of exclusively business fixed-lo cation connections in the census tract. Maps showing residential subscribership rates by census tract The two maps based on estimated Internet access connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction per 1,000 households (that is, estimated household subscribership, or adoption, rates) are not comparable to ZIP Code-based maps developed from FCC Form 477 data for June 30, 2008 and earlier dates because numbers of connections were never reported for individual ZIP Codes. Readers should note that these two maps (1) exclude all connections identified as business connections and (2) necessarily exclude residential mobile wireless connections (which are reported for the state but not for individual census tracts). U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 83 G lossary Term Definition aDSL Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line: A digital local loop typically using copper facilities and providing greater bandwidth in one direction than the other. Cable modem service A service which offers customers access to the Internet over a cable system. Downstream speed Speed of transmission from the Internet to the end user. End users Residential, business, institutional, or government entities who use services for their own purposes and who do not resell such services to other entities. Facilities-based provider Entity that owns the portion of the physical facility that terminates at the end-user location, obtains an unbundled network element (UNE), special access line, or other leased facility that terminates at the end-user location and provisions/equips it as a connection that transfers information at rates over 200 kbps in at least one direc tion, or provisions/equips a wireless channel that transfers information at rates over 200 kbps in at least one direction to the end-user location over licensed spectrum or over spectrum that the provider uses on an unlicensed basis. Fixed wireless A radio communication service between specified fixed points. Fixed-location technologies All technologies other than terrestrial mobile wireless. FTTH or FTTP Fiber to the Home (Premises): A network access architecture in which optical fiber is deployed all the way to the customer’s home (premises). Internet access service Service that provides end users access to the Internet. ISPs Internet Service Providers: Companies or organizations that provide Internet access service (see above). iVoIP Interconnected Voice Over Internet Protocol: A service that enables real- time, two-way voice communications; requires a broadband connection from the user’s location; requires Internet-protocol compatible customer premises equipment; and permits user s generally to receive calls that originate on the public switched telephone network and to terminate calls to the public switched telephone network. Mobile wireless service A radio communication service between mobile and fixed stations, or between mobile stations. Mobile wireless provider Provider of mobile wireless service (see above). Other wireline All copper-wire based technologies other than DSL technologies; Ethernet over copper and T-1 are examples. Power line Internet access service delivered over electric power transmission lines. Satellite communications A telecommunications service provided via one or more satellite relays and their associated uplinks and downlinks. sDSL Symmetric Digital Subscriber Line: DSL technology that provides equal bandwidth for both uploads and downloads. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 84 Speed tiers Sub-groupings defined by ranges of upstream speeds and downstream speeds. Upstream speed Speed of transmission from the end user to the Internet. Wi-Fi hotspot Wireless Fidelity: Generic term referring to any type of IEEE 802.11 wireless network. A hotspot is a small geographic area in which users can gain access to a Wi-Fi network which in turn connects to the Internet. Wireless service Telephone, Internet, data, and other services provided to customers through the transmission of signals over networks of radio towers. Wireless service provider Provider of wireless service (see above). Wireless telecommunications Any means of electronic data transfer using electromagnetic means, most commonly radio waves. WISP Wireless ISP: A company that provides end users with wireless access to the Internet, most commonly by using radio spectrum designated for unlicensed use. WLAN Wireless local area network: A WL AN uses radio waves to connect user devices to a local area network (LAN), thereby extending an existing wired LAN. . U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 85 Customer Response Publication: Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2011 You can help us provide the best possible information to the public by completing this form and returning it to the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of the FCC's Wireline Competition Bureau. 1. Please check the category that best describes you: ____ press ____ current telecommunications carrier ____ potential teleco mmunications carrier ____ business customer evalua ting vendors/service options ____ consultant, law firm, lobbyist ____ other business customer ____ academic/student ____ residential customer ____ FCC employee ____ other federal gove rnment employee ____ state or local government employee ____ Other (please specify) 2. Please rate the report: Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor No opinion Data accuracy (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Data presentation (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Timeliness of data (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Completeness of data (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Text clarity (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Completeness of text (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) 3. Overall, how do you Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor No opinion rate this report? (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) 4. How can this report be improved? 5. May we contact you to di scuss possible improvements? Name: Telephone #: To discuss the information in this report, contact: 202-418-0940 or for users of TTY equipment, call 202-418-0484 Fax this response to or Mail this response to 202-418-0520 FCC/WCB/IATD, Mail Stop 1600 F Washington, DC 20554