United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 13-1013 September Term, 2012
Filed On: August 2, 2013
In re: Legacy Communications, LLC, et al.,
Petitioners
BEFORE: Henderson, Brown, and Srinivasan, Circuit Judges
O R D E R
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus, the first and second
supplements thereto, the response, and the reply, it is
ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus be denied.  The right to
issuance of the writ must be "clear and indisputable" and petitioners must have "no
adequate alternative means to obtain the relief they seek."  Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.,
473 F.3d 345, 353 (D.C. Cir. 2007).  Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for
appeal even if hardship may result from delay.  See Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S.
104, 110 (1964).  
 
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.
Per Curiam
USCA Case #13-1013      Document #1449771            Filed: 08/02/2013      Page 1 of 1