APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE 
SUBCOMMITTEE ON 
STATE, FOREIGN OPERATIONS, AND RELATED 
PROGRAMS 
SUBCOMMITTEE ON 
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE, AND RELATED 
AGENCIES 
PERMANENT SELECT 
COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE 
RANKING MEMBER, SUBCOMMITTEE ON 
TECHNICAL AND TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE 
E-MAIL VIA WEB ADDRESS AT: 
www.house.gov/schiff 
FACE BOOK: 
www.facebook.com/repadamschiff 
November 21, 2014 
The Honorable Tom Wheeler 
ADAM B. SCHIFF 
28TH DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA 
Chairman; Federal Communications Commission 
445 12th Street, SW 
Washington, DC 20554 
RE: Preserving Low Power Television Options 
Dear Chairman Wheeler: 
WASHINGTON OFFICE: 
D 2411 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING 
WASHINGTON, DC 20515 
D 
D 
(202) 225-4176 
FAX: (202) 225-5828 
DISTRICT OFFICE: 
245 EAST OLIVE AVENUE 
S UITE 200 
BURBANK, CA 91502 
(818)450-2900 
FAX: (818)450-2928 
DISTRICT OFFICE: 
5500 HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD 
SUITE 416 
Los ANGELES, CA 90028 
(323) 315-5555 
(BY APPOINTMENT ONLY) 
As the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) moves forward with the Broadcast 
Television Spectrum Incentive Auction, I urge the Commission to take into consideration the 
effects of the auction and the repacking process on Low Power Television stations (LPTV), 
particularly those that reach underserved audiences. 
I share your support for a timely and successful incentive auction, as mandated by the Middle 
Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act, which will generate revenue and free spectrum for 
mobile -broadband applications. However, I also believe the Commission should look holistically 
at the broadcast television landscape, including LPTV, and take into account the impact of 
repacking on audience access to the over the air programming they want and expect. 
As you are aware, my colleagues Representative Joe Barton of Texas and Representative Anna 
Eshoo of California recently wrote to the Government Accountability Office to ask that they 
study the LPTV landscape and the possible effects of repacking on their ability to broadcast. 
Reps. Barton and Eshoo's letter raises important questions that should inform the Commission's 
deliberations on this issue, specifically gaining a better understanding of the effects of repacking 
on LPTV and a survey of the range of LPTV options available. I also appreciate that the FCC has 
requested comments from stakeholders on issues related to LPTV and the incentive auction, and 
I urge you to closely examine the feedback and ideas you receive during this process. 
Above all, I urge the Commission to keep in mind the way its decisions will impact audiences, 
particularly those that are not well-served by full power television offerings. For example, in my 
district in the Los Angeles region, the large Armenian speaking population is served by LPTV 
stations, including US Armenian TV (KHO) which broadcasts high-quality and original content. 
It is important that in evaluating LPTV's impact that the FCC distinguish between translator and 
other stations that simply rebroadcast commercial signals, and stations that reach an audience 
THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE OF RECYCLED FIBERS 
1225
that would otherwise not receive programming in their native language and relevant to their daily 
lives. 
As the incentive auction process moves forward, I urge the Commission to continue to study the 
impact on LPTV and consider steps to ensure that as the process unfolds, audiences will continue 
to have access to the content they want and expect. 
I appreciate your consideration of my views and request that you provide a response detailing the 
Commission's thinking on this topic. Please feel free to respond through my staff member, Jeff 
Lowenstein, who can be reached jeff.lowenstein@mail.house.gov. 
Sincerely, 
Member of Congress