PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Report No. 3017 April 8, 2015 PETITIONS FOR RECONDSIDERATION OF ACTION IN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING WC Docket No. 13-184 WC Docket No. 10-90 Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission’s Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.429(e). The full text of these documents is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12 th Street, SW, Washington, DC; may be accessed online via the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System at http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/; or may be purchased from the Commission’s copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (telephone: 800-378-3160). Oppositions to these petitions must be filed within 15 days of the date of public notice of the petitions in the Federal Register. 1 Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subjects: - In the Matter of Modernizing the E-rate Program for Schools and Libraries (WC Docket No. 13-184) - In the Matter of the Connect American Fund (WC Docket No. 10-90) Filed by: - Charles F. Hobbs, on behalf of AdTec, Inc., February 18, 2015 - Kathleen O’Brien Ham et al., on behalf of T-Mobile USA, Inc., March 6, 2015 - Jennifer Hightower et al., on behalf of Cox Communications, Inc., March 6, 2015 - Derrick B. Owens et al., on behalf of WTA – Advocates for Rural Broadband et al., March 6, 2015. 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FCC 1 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4(b) and 1.429(f). 2 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4(b) and 1.429(g). 3 Although the Petitions for Reconsideration filed on behalf of Cox Communications and WTA – Advocates for Rural Broadband et al. seek reconsideration of an Order that was clearly identified as part of both WC Docket No. 13-184 and WC Docket No. 10-90, the Petitions erroneously omitted WC Docket No. 10-90 from their captions and were not filed in WC Docket No. 10-90. Because these Petitions for Reconsideration address an Order adopted in WC Docket No. 13-184 and WC Docket No. 10-90, we are seeking comment on them in both dockets.