Updated: April 9, 2015 LIST OF PENDING APPELLATE CASES Name: Ion Media Chicago License, Inc. v. FCC Case No: 01-1457 Court: District of Columbia Circuit FCC Order Description: In re: Paxson Chicago License, Inc. v. 21st Century TV Cable, Inc., et al., DA 01-149, 16 FCC Rcd 2185 and Paxson Chicago License, Inc. v. 21st Century TV Cable, Inc., et al., 16 FCC Rcd 15571 (2001). Not docketed. FCC Order No. 01-226 Case Description: Paxson challenges the FCC’s denial of its “must carry” complaints against thirteen Chicago cable operators on the basis of a finding that no current FCC rules require mandatory carriage of both a broadcaster’s digital and analog signal among other things. Status: Held in abeyance. Name: James A. Kay, Jr., et al. v. FCC Case No: 06-1076 Court: District of Columbia Circuit FCC Order Description: In re: improving public safety communications in the 800 MHz band, 22 FCC Rcd 10467 (2007) and previous underlying orders, FCC Docket No. WT 02-55, et al. FCC Order No. 05-174, et al. Case Description: Petitioners challenge the FCC’s decisions restructuring the 800 MHz band to reduce radiofrequency interference to public safety systems. Among other things, they claim that the decisions unfairly discriminate between similarly situated parties. Status: Court order dated October 21, 2014 dismissed case numbers 07-1332 & 07-1367 (Charles Guskey). Mobile Relay’s motion for voluntary dismissal of case numbers 06-1082 and 07-1218 granted December 17, 2014 (Mandate). Initial brief filed March 9, 2015. Final brief due May 5, 2014. 2 Name: Sprint Nextel Corporation v. FCC Case No: 06-1278 Court: District of Columbia Circuit FCC Order Description: In re: review of the spectrum sharing plan among non-geostationary satellite orbit mobile satellite service systems in the 1.6/2.4 GHz bands, 19 FCC Rcd 13356 (2004), et al., FCC Docket No. WT 03-66, et al. FCC Order No. 04-134 and 06-46. Case Description: Petitioner seeks review of the FCC’s orders in which the FCC adopted a plan for spectrum sharing among operators in the 2495-2690 MHz bands. Status: Held in abeyance. Name: Global Crossing Bandwidth, Inc. v. FCC & USA Case No: 12-1482 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of Universal Service Contribution Methodology Case Description: Global Crossing challenges Universal Service Contribution Methodology, FCC 12-134, WC Docket No. 06-122 (rel. Nov. 5, 2012). In that Order, the FCC affirmed certain aspects of its universal service contribution methodology – specifically, the contribution obligations of a wholesale carrier. The FCC also provided guidance on the type and quality of evidence that the Universal Service Administrative Company (“USAC”) should use in evaluating a wholesale carrier’s claim that it should not be held responsible for making universal service contributions based on revenues from providing service to reseller customers. Status: Petition for Review filed December 19, 2012. Initial brief filed January 9, 2015. Final brief filed February 27, 2015. Oral argument held April 6, 2015. 3 Name: Securus Technologies, Inc., et al. v. FCC & USA Case No: 13-1280 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services, FCC 13-113 (rel: September 26, 2013), WC Docket No. 12-375 Case Description: In the order on review, the Commission required that end user rates for payphone calls placed from incarceration facilities, known as Inmate Calling Services, be based on the costs of providing service. As an interim measure to bring rates closer to costs pending receipt of additional information on which to base a permanent regime, the agency established a two-tiered rate cap pricing system that includes a “safe harbor” rate and a higher hard cap that no carrier may exceed without a waiver. Status: Petition for Review filed November 14, 2013. Court order January 13, 2014 granted in part & denied in part petitioners’ motions for judicial stay. Initial brief filed July 21, 2014. FCC motion to hold case in abeyance granted December 16, 2014. Status report filed February 17, 2015 Name: Mary V. Harris Foundation v. FCC Case No: 13-1304 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Holy Family Communications, Inc. – For a New Noncommercial FM Station at Lancaster, New York, FCC 13-41 (rel: April 2, 2013) Case Description: An appeal involving the grant of a construction permit for a new noncommercial educational FM broadcast station in western NY. Appellant primarily argues that the Media Bureau was unreasonable in not granting the Foundation a dispositive “fair distribution preference” where the station would be close to, but under, the threshold set out in the rules for that preference. Status: Appeal filed December 13, 2013. Record filed January 30, 2014. Initial brief filed April 30, 2014. Final brief filed June 19, 2014. Oral argument held October 27, 2014. FCC order affirmed by Opinion January 20, 2015. Mandate issued March 26, 2015. 4 Name: David Alan Schum, et al. v. FCC & USA Case No: 14-1026 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In re Applications of DFW Radio License, LLC and Bernard Dallas, LLC and Principle Broadcasting Network Dallas, LLC for Assignment of the Authorizations of Stations KFCD(AM), Farmersville, Texas and KHSE(AM), Wylie, Texas, FCC 14-3 (rel: January 22, 2014) Case Description: Schum contends that the Commission acted unlawfully in dismissing and otherwise denying his applications for review of the Media Bureau’s consent to the assignment of two radio station licenses from DFW Radio to Bernard Dallas, and then from Bernard Dallas to Principle Broadcasting. Schum asks the Court to vacate or reverse the Commission’s Order and to return the licenses to DFW Radio, or alternatively, require the FCC to investigate and conduct a hearing on the assignees’ qualifications to be a Commission licensee. Status: Petition for Review filed February 21, 2014. Case No. 14-1027 consolidated with this case. Record filed July 21, 2014. Initial brief filed November 13, 2014. Final brief filed December 16, 2014. Name: FiberTower Spectrum Holdings, LLC v. FCC Case No: 14-1039 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of FiberTower Spectrum Holdings LLC – Requests for Waiver, Extension of Time, or in the alternative, Limited Waiver of Substantial Service Requirements, etc., FCC 14-18 (rel: February 27, 2014) Case Description: FiberTower, which holds several wireless licenses, challenges a Commission order affirming a Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) decision holding that FiberTower failed to demonstrate compliance with the “substantial service requirements” in the Commission’s rules, as well as WTB’s denial of an extension of time to demonstrate substantial service. Status: Notice of Appeal filed March 28, 2014. Record filed May 19, 2014. Initial brief filed October 14, 2014. Final brief filed December 1, 2014. Oral argument held January 20, 2015. Affirmed in part, vacated and remanded in part by Opinion April 3, 2015. 5 Name: Signal Above, L.L.C. v. FCC & USA Case No: 14-1069 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 73 and 74 of the Commission’s Rules to Establish Rules for Digital Low Power Television, Television Translator, and Television Booster Stations and to Amend Rules for Digital Class A Television Stations, FCC 13-126, MM Dkt. No. 03-185 (rel: Sept. 27, 2013) Case Description: Signal Above seeks review of the FCC’s denial of its petition requesting reconsideration of the agency’s earlier decision not to extend the Sept. 1, 2015 digital transition deadline for low power television stations. Status: Petition for Review filed May 5, 2014. Held in Abeyance. Name: Howard Stirk Holdings, LLC, et al. v. FCC & USA Case No: 14-1090 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: 2010 and 2014 Quadrennial Regulatory Review – Review of the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Promoting Diversification of Ownership in the Broadcast Services; and Rules and Policies Concerning Attribution of Joint Sales Agreements in Local Television Markets, FCC 14-28 (rel: April 15, 2104) Case Description: Petitioners challenge the FCC’s new rule under which certain joint sales agreements between TV stations in the same market create an attributable interest for purposes of assessing compliance with the Commission’s media ownership limits. Petitioners also challenge the agency’s decision to defer resolution of certain issues concerning its media ownership rules until it updates the record in the Quadrennial Review proceeding. Status: Petition for Review filed May 30, 2014. Motion to Transfer (to 3rd Cir.), pending. Prometheus motion to deconsolidate case number 14-1113 and transfer to 3rd Circuit filed September 19, 2014. Initial brief due June 11, 2015. Final brief due August 20, 2015. 6 Name: Bob Law, et al. v. FCC Case No: 14-1130 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of Urban Radio I, LLC, Debtor-in-Possession and YMF Media, New York Licensee LLC for Consent to Assign Licenses (WBLS(FM) & WLIB(AM), New York, NY, FCC 14-83 (rel: June 10, 2014) Case Description: Appeal from FCC order that dismissed in part and denied in part an application for review of the grant of assignments of licenses of radio stations WBLS(FM) and WLIB(AM) in New York, NY from Urban Radio, I, LLC (Debtor in Possession) to YMF Media. Status: Notice of Appeal filed July 7, 2014. Record filed August 7, 2014. Initial brief due March 27, 2015. Final brief filed May 1, 2015. FCC motion to dispense without oral argument filed March 27, 2015. Name: ADX Communications of Pensacola, et al. v. FCC Case No: 14-1131 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of 6 Johnson Road Licenses, Assignor and Cumulus Licensing LLC, Assignee – Applications for Assignment of Stations WMEZ(FM), Pensacola, Florida and WXBM(FM), Milton, Florida, etc., FCC 14-82 (rel: June 10, 2014) Case Description: ADX Communications appeals the Commission’s grant of applications for the assignment of several radio licenses in the Mobile Alabama and Pensacola Florida Arbitron Metro areas to Cumulus Licensing LLC. Status: Notice of Appeal filed July 9, 2014. Record filed August 25, 2014. Initial brief filed February 3, 2015. Final brief filed March 24, 2015. Oral argument scheduled for May 8, 2015. 7 Name: National Association of Broadcasters, et al. v. FCC & USA Case No: 14-1154 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Expanding the Economic and Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum Through Incentive Auctions, FCC 14-50 (rel: June 2, 2014) Case Description: Petitions for review of the June 2014 Report and Order adopting rules to implement the broadcast television spectrum incentive auction. Status: Petition for Review filed August 18, 2014. Record filed September 12, 2014. Case numbers 14-1179 and 14-1218 consolidated with this case. Initial brief filed December 16, 2014. Final brief filed January 27, 2015. Oral argument held March 12, 2015. Name: Beach TV Properties, Inc. f/k/a The Atlanta Channel, Inc. v. FCC Case No: 14-1229 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of The Atlanta Channel, Inc. – Statement of Eligibility for Class A Television Status for Low Power Television Station WTHC-LP, Atlanta, Georgia, DA 14-1460 (rel: Oct. 7, 2014) Case Description: Appeal arising from the Media Bureau’s dismissal, in 2000, of the request of The Atlanta Channel, Inc. (now known as Beach TV Properties, Inc.) for Class A designation of Atlanta-area LPTV station WTHC- LP. Status: Notice of Appeal filed November 4, 2014. Record filed December 22, 2014. Case number 14-1230 consolidated with this case. FCC brief filed March 19, 2015. FCC motion to dispense without oral argument filed March 19, 2015. 8 Name: Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley, et al. v. FCC & USA Case No: 14-1234 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of Rules & Regulations Implementing the TCP Act of 1991; Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005 – Application for Review filed by Anda, Inc. . . . , FCC 14-164 (rel: Oct. 30, 2014) Case Description: In this group of twelve consolidated cases, petitioners challenge Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 et al., CG Docket Nos. 02-278 & 05-338, Order (October 30, 2014). That Order (1) clarified the Commission’s previous reading of two federal statutes as requiring senders of fax ads to include opt out information, even to parties who have agreed to receive such ads, and (2) retroactively waived prior violations of the Commission’s rule. One group of petitioners argue that the Commission does not have authority to promulgate the rule, while another argues that the Commission’s retroactive waiver for past violations is invalid. Status: Petition for Review filed November 10, 2014. Case numbers 14-1235, 14-1239, 14-1243, 14-1270, 14-1279, 14-1292, 14-1293, 14-1294, 14-1295, 14-1297, 14-1299 and 14-1302 consolidated with this case. Intervenor’s motion to dismiss case number 14-1302, pending. Name: In re: PMCM TV, LLC Case No: 14-1238 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: Letter dated November 7, 2014 from Video Division, Media Bureau to PMCM Case Description: Suspension of program test authority. Status: Emergency Petition for Issuance of Writ of Mandamus filed November 10, 2014. FCC opposition filed November 18, 2014. Oral argument held February 3, 2015. Petition denied by unpublished, per curiam order February 27, 2015. 9 Name: CBS Corporation, et al. v. FCC & USA Case No: 14-1242 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of Comcast Corp. & Time Warner Cable, Inc. and AT&T, Inc. & DIRECTV – For Consent To Assign or Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations, DA 14-1601, 14-1602, 14-1604 & 14-1605 (rel: Nov. 4, 2014) Case Description: This case involves a dispute over access to confidential documents filed with the Commission in connection with two pending mergers: Comcast-Time Warner-Charter and AT&T-DirecTV. A group of programmers and broadcasters sought an emergency stay of the Commission’s order to release certain confidential information under two protective orders. Petitioners contend that in ordering the confidential information released pursuant to the protective orders, the Commission will violate the Trade Secrets Act and will cause the petitioners irreparable harm. Status: Petition for Review and Emergency Motion for Stay filed November 13, 2014. FCC Opposition filed November 17, 2014. Motion for Stay granted by court order November 21, 2014. FCC brief filed January 2, 2015. Oral argument held February 20, 2015. Name: William Johnson v. FCC Case No: 14-1250 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: Letter dated Sept. 15, 2014 from Audio Division, Media Bureau – In re: W227AV, Newbury, Florida – Reach Communications, Inc. (Assignor), Suncoast Radio, Inc. (Assignee) Case Description: Dismissal of an Application for Review of the Media Bureau’s dismissal of a Petition for Review. Status: Petition for Review filed November 17, 2014. Petitioner’s motion to seal denied by court order March 6, 2015 and petitioner ordered to withdraw the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and pay docketing fee within 30-days from date of this order. 10 Name: Lawrence Behr v. FCC Case No: 15-1003 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Lawrence Behr – Application for Modification of 220-222 MHz Station WPW222, FCC 14-207 (rel: Dec. 17, 2014) Case Description: Appeal from FCC order upholding Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ruling denying request for hearing on alleged partial denial of application to modify license and waive construction deadline of applicable rule governing an unbuilt 220MHz private land mobile radio station in Denver, CO. Status: Notice of Appeal filed January 8, 2015. Record filed February 23, 2015. Appellant’s motion for summary reversal filed February 20, 2015. FCC response filed March 5, 2015. Appellant’s reply filed March 11, 2015. Name: Silver Fish Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC Case No: 15-1004 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Silver Fish Broadcasting, Inc., License Status of Silent Station (DWTTT(FM), Stratford, NH, FCC 14-194 (rel: Dec. 11, 2014) Case Description: Status: Notice of Appeal filed January 12, 2015. Record filed March 2, 2015. Initial brief due June 8, 2015. Final brief due July 13, 2015. 11 Name: AT&T, Inc. v. FCC & USA Case No: 15-1038 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Connect America Fund – ETC Annual Reports and Certifications - - Petition of USTelecom for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C 160(c) from Obsolete ILEC Regulatory Obligations that Inhibit Deployment of Next-Generation Networks, FCC 14-190 (rel: Dec. 18, 2014) Case Description: “Price-cap affiliates of AT&T petition for review of the Commission’s decision to continue to require them to provide voice telephony in certain high-cost areas, and to provide Lifeline service in both high- and low- cost areas, even when the carriers receive no USF support in those areas.” Status: Petition for Review filed February 19, 2015. Record/Dispositive motions due April 10, 2015. Name: In re: PMCM TV, LLC Case No: 15-1058 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: Case Description: Status: Petition for Issuance of Writ of Mandamus filed March 17, 2015. 12 Name: AT&T Corp. v. FCC & USA Case No: 15-1059 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Connect America Fund - - Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, FCC 15-14 (rel: Feb. 11, 2015) Case Description: AT&T challenges the Commission’s declaratory ruling concerning the scope of its VoIP symmetry rule. It contends that the FCC erred in interpreting the rule to permit a competitive carrier to assess access charges for end office switching services when neither the carrier nor its VoIP provider partner provides the physical last-mile facility to the VoiP provider’s end user customers. Status: Petition for Review filed March 23, 2015. Procedural motions due April 23, 2015. Record/Dispositive motions due May 8, 2015. Name: United States Telecom Ass’n v. FCC & USA Case No: 15-1063 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, FCC 15-24 (rel: Mar. 12, 2015) Case Description: Petitioners challenge an order in which the FCC adopted new rules to preserve the open Internet and reclassified broadband Internet access service as a telecommunications service. Status: Petition for Review filed March 23, 2015. Procedural motions due April 23, 2015. Record/Dispositive motions due May 8, 2015. 13 Name: Great Lakes Comnet, et al. v. FCC & USA Case No: 15-1064 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: AT&T Services Inc. and AT&T Corp. v. Great Lakes Comnet, et al., FCC 15-31 (rel: Mar. 18, 2015) Case Description: Petitioners seek vacatur of a Commission order that granted AT&T’s claims, in a formal complaint proceeding under 47 U.S.C. s 208, that petitioner Great Lakes Connect, Inc. (GLC) billed AT&T for interstate access services under an unlawful tariff, and that petitioner Westphalia Telephone Company unlawfully billed AT&T for services that GLC provided. Petitioners argue that the Commission’s order exceeds the FCC’s jurisdiction, violates the U.S. Constitution, and is arbitrary and capricious and impermissibly retroactive under the APA. Status: Petition for Review filed March 23, 2015. Procedural motions due April 23, 2015. Record/Dispositive motions due May 8, 2015. Name: The Tennis Channel, Inc. v. FCC & USA Case No: 15-1067 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Tennis Channel, Inc., Complainant v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Defendant, FCC 15-7 (rel: Jan. 28, 2015) Case Description: Status: Petition for Review filed March 27, 2015. Procedural motions due April 29, 2015. Record/Dispositive motions due May 14, 2015. 14 Name: Neustar, Inc. v. FCC & USA Case No: 15-1080 Court: D.C. Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Telcordia Technologies, Inc. Petition to Reform Amendment 57 and to Order a Competitive Bidding Process for Number Portability Administration, etc., FCC 15-35 (rel: Mar. 27, 2015) Case Description: Status: Petition for Review filed April 6, 2015. Procedural motions due May 7, 2015. Record/Dispositive motions due May 22, 2015. Name: Paul Sterling v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC Case No: 14-1247 Court: Second Circuit FCC Order Description: None Case Description: Status: FCC as Amicus party. FCC Letter brief filed February 24, 2015. Proceedings stayed by court order March 2, 2015 pending outcome of the agency’s administrative proceeding presently considering the issue before this court. 15 Name: Montgomery County, Maryland v. FCC & USA Case No: 15-1240 Court: Fourth Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities Siting Policies, etc., FCC 14-153 (rel: Oct. 21, 2014) Case Description: Status: Petition for Review filed March 6, 2015. Record due April 15, 2015. Case number 15-1284 consolidated with this case. FCC brief due June 9, 2015. Name: City of Bellevue, Washington, et al. v. FCC & USA Case No: 15-1284 Court: Fourth Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities Siting Policies, etc., FCC 14-153 (rel: Oct. 21, 2014) Case Description: Status: Petition for Review filed March 9, 2015. Formerly D.C. Case No. 15-1051. FCC motion to transfer case to fourth circuit granted March 17, 2015. Docketed in fourth circuit and consolidated with case number 15-1240. 16 Name: Dayton Access Television, Inc. v. FCC Case No: 07-4467 Court: Sixth Circuit FCC Order Description: In re: implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, 22 FCC Rcd 19633 (2007), FCC 07-190, MB Docket No. 05-311 Case Description: Petitioners challenge the FCC’s decision to extend a number of the rules adopted in the first Section 621 Order to applications for franchise renewals by incumbent cable operators. Status: Held in abeyance. Status report filed January 22, 2015. Petitioner’s motion for voluntary dismissal granted by court order February 11, 2015. Case No. 08-3023 (below) remains pending. Name: Montgomery County, Maryland v. FCC & USA Case No: 08-3023 Court: Sixth Circuit FCC Order Description: In re: implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, 22 FCC Rcd 19633 (2007). FCC Docket No. MB 05-311. FCC Order No. 07-190. Case Description: Petitioners challenge the FCC’s decision to extend a number of the rules adopted in the first Section 621 Order to applications for franchise renewals by incumbent cable operators. Status: Held in abeyance. Case previously consolidated with case number 07-4467 (above, which was dismissed). Status report filed February 23, 2015. 17 Name: National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. FCC Case No: 08-3369 Court: Sixth Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Leased Commercial Access, R&O and Further NPR, 23 FCC Rcd 2909 (2008). FCC Docket No. MB 07-42. FCC Order No. 07-208. Case Description: Petitioners challenge the FCC’s modification of its leased access rules, which require cable operators to provide channel capacity for commercial use by unaffiliated programmers pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 532. Status: Held in abeyance. Name: The State of Tennessee v. FCC & USA Case No: 15-3291 Court: Sixth Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: City of Wilson, North Carolina – Petition for Preemption of North Carolina General Statute Sections 160A-340 et seq. - - The Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, Tennessee – Petition for Preemption of a Portion of Tennessee Code Annotated 7-52-601, FCC 15-25 (rel: March 12, 2015) Case Description: Petitioners challenge the FCC’s preemption of state-law limits on municipal broadband in North Carolina and Tennessee. Status: Petition for Review filed March 20, 2015. 18 Name: In re: FCC 11-161 Case No: 11-9900 Court: Tenth Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Connect America Fund. WC 10-90, 07-135, 05-337 and 03-109; GN 09-51; CC 01-92 and 96-45; WT 10-208. FCC 11-161 Case Description: Petitioners challenge various aspects of an order in which the FCC comprehensively reformed its universal service and intercarrier compensation systems. Status: Petition for Review filed December 2, 2011. Thirty-One (31) additional petitions for review have been consolidated with this lead case. FCC filed thirteen (13) responsive briefs in February - March 2013. FCC Final briefs filed July 24 and July 29, 2013. Oral argument held November 19, 2013. All petitions for review denied by Opinion May 23, 2013. Petitions for Rehearing denied August 27, 2014. Mandate issued September 4, 2014. Petition for Cert. filed by U.S. Cellular November 25, 2014. Petitions for Cert. filed by NARUC, Allband and Cellular South filed January 26, 2015. Gov’t responses filed March 27, 2015. Name: Saturn Telecommunication Services, Inc. v. FCC & USA Case No: 14-15422 Court: Eleventh Circuit FCC Order Description: In the Matter of: Saturn Telecommunications Services, Inc. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Florida, FCC 14-147 (rel: Oct. 7, 2014) Case Description: Petitioner Saturn Telecommunications Services (STS), a competitive local exchange carrier, seeks review of FCC action dismissing (as barred by the terms of a prior settlement agreement between the parties) STS’s formal complaint against incumbent BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC (BellSouth) regarding BellSouth’s compliance with alleged interconnection and network element access obligations. Status: Petition for Review filed December 4, 2014. Record filed January 21, 2015. FCC brief due May 12, 2015.