General Information Request Regarding the AT&T/East Kentucky Transaction Question for East Kentucky WT Docket No. 15-79 May 21, 2015 1. Explain in detail the decision made by East Kentucky to assign the Lower 700 MHz C Block spectrum that is the subject of this application to AT&T, including any attempts made to enter into a sale of this spectrum or alternative arrangements with parties other than AT&T. 2 Instructions 1. Unless otherwise specified, all Information and Document Requests cover the period from April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015. 2. Corporations and other entities, including affiliated or subsidiary entities, shall be identified by the Central Index Key (“CIK”) assigned by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). A unique identifier should be used for each entity that has not been assigned a CIK by the SEC. 3. Contact Commission staff to discuss an acceptable format for the submission of all documents and data. 4. Each requested document shall be submitted in its entirety, even if only a portion of that document is responsive to a request made herein. This means that the document shall not be edited, cut, or expunged, and shall include all appendices, tables, or other attachments, and all other documents referred to in the document or attachments. All written materials necessary to understand any document responsive to these requests shall also be submitted. Provide final versions of each document; however, if a final version does not exist, provide one copy of the latest draft of the document. 5. Those documents written in a language other than English must be translated into English; automated or machine translations are not permitted. Submit the foreign language document, with the English translation attached thereto. 6. Unless otherwise specified, provide data and interrogatory responses separately for prepaid, post-paid, wholesale, and all mobile wireless services. The Company should provide a separate response for interrogatory, data, and documents (i.e., please do not submit the Company’s interrogatory and data responses on the same discs). 7. Data provided in response to this Request should include a list of all parameters/assumptions on which the data are based. 8. Unless otherwise agreed to by the Commission, requests for the production of documents (and any particular type of document) require the production of all responsive documents in the possession, custody, or control of the Company. 9. Documents must be uniquely and sequentially numbered across the entire production. For each document or statement submitted in response to the requests, indicate, by number and subsection, the request to which it is responsive and, for documents, identify the Person(s) from whose files the document was retrieved (i.e., custodian). Group submitted materials according to the request number to which they are responsive and then, within each of those request-number groupings, by the appropriate custodian. 10. If search terms were used to conduct all or any part of a search conducted in response to this Information Request, provide a list of search terms used, along with a glossary of industry and company terminology. In addition, describe the search methodologies and the applications used to execute the search. 11. The specific requests made herein are continuing in nature. The Company is required to produce in the future any and all documents and information that are responsive to the requests made herein but not initially produced at the time, date, and place specified herein. In this regard, the Company must supplement its responses (a) if the Company learns that, in some material respect, the documents and information initially disclosed were incomplete or incorrect or (b) if additional responsive documents or information are acquired by or become known to the Company after the initial production. 3 12. Any documents that are withheld in whole or in part from production based on a claim of privilege shall be assigned document control numbers (with unique consecutive numbers for each page of each document). 13. For each Document identified on the Company privilege log: 1) Provide the document control number(s); 2) Identify all authors of the document; 3) Identify all addressees of the document; 4) Identify all recipients of the document or of any copies of the document, to the extent not included among the document’s addressees; 5) Provide the date of the document; 6) Provide a description of the subject matter of the document; 7) State the nature or type of the privilege that the Company is asserting for the document (e.g., “attorney-client privilege”); 8) Provide the number(s) of the Request to which the document is responsive; 9) Provide the document control number(s) of any attachments to the document, regardless of whether any privilege is being asserted for such attachment(s); and 10) State whether the document has been produced in redacted form, and include the range of Document ID labels for those produced documents. 14. The Company’s privilege log shall also conform with all of the following requirements: 1) Provide a separate legend identifying each author, addressee, and recipient identified on the Company’s privilege log. 2) Identify on the privilege log, and denote with an asterisk, all attorneys acting in a legal capacity with respect to the withheld document or communication. 3) The description of the subject matter of each document shall describe the nature of the document in a manner that, though not revealing information that is itself privileged, provides sufficiently detailed information to enable the Commission to assess the applicability of the privilege claimed. 4) For each document withheld under a claim that it constitutes or contains attorney work product, also state whether the Company asserts that the document was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial and, if so, specify the anticipated litigation or trial upon which the assertion is based. 5) Produce all nonprivileged portions of any responsive document (including nonprivileged or redactable attachments) for which a claim of privilege is asserted, except where the only nonprivileged information in the document has already been produced. Note where any redactions in the document have been made. 6) The privilege log shall be produced in both hardcopy and electronic form, the electronic form of which shall be both searchable and sortable. 7) Documents sent solely between counsel, including in-house counsel acting solely in a legal capacity, and documents authored by the Company’s outside counsel that were not directly or indirectly furnished to any third party, such as internal law firm memoranda, may be omitted from the privilege log. However, any attachments to such documents must be included on the privilege log (if a privilege is applicable to such materials), unless such attachments are addressed and sent solely to counsel.