FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN The Honorable Chuck Fleischmann U.S. House of Representatives 230 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Fleischmann: July 27, 2016 Thank you for your inquiry into the status of theE-rate appeal filed by the Sweetwater City Schools Consortium (Sweetwater). As you know, the E-rate program, more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program, is dedicated to ensuring all of America's schools and libraries can purchase affordable telecommunications, internet access, and internal connections (WiFi equipment). I agree that it is important to resolve this matter in a timely manner, and more broadly share your belief that broadband connectivity is absolutely necessary to prepare our students for the 21st century. Sweetwater' s appeal of the Universal Service Administrative Company's denial ofE-rate funding for funding years 2013 , 2014, and 2015 is pending before the Commission ' s Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau). Bureau staff is currently conducting a detailed, de novo review of the documents submitted by Sweetwater and its service provider, Education Networks of America (ENA), as part of their respective appeals. The full record under consideration also includes a filing by AT&T disputing claims made in the appeals , as well as Sweetwater' s response to AT&T's filing. Bureau staff has also requested additional information from Sweetwater and ENA in order to ensure a complete and accurate record . The Bureau will thoroughly and promptly review that information once received and work to resolve the appeal. Resolving Sweetwater's appeal in a timely fashion is a high priority for the Commission. Given the disputed nature of the record and the need to gather and review additional information from the parties, however, the matter may not be resolved by August 8, 2016. Commission rules authorize the Bureau to extend by up to 90 days the period for action in response to a decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company. 1 In order to complete a comprehensive review and reach a well-considered decision , the Bureau may need to extend the decision deadline . Thank you again for raising these concerns. I will continue to monitor the Bureau's progress on this matter and keep you apprised of the status. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. 1 See 47 CFR 54.724 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMM IS S ION WASHINGTON OFF ICE OF THE CHA I RMAN The Honorable Stephen Fincher U.S. House of Representatives 2452 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Fincher: July27,2016 Thank you for your inquiry into the status of the E-rate appeal filed by the Sweetwater City Schools Consortium (Sweetwater). As you know, the E-rate program , more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program, is dedicated to ensuring all of America ' s schools and libraries can purchase affordable telecommunications, internet access, and internal connections (WiFi equipment). I agree that it is important to resolve this matter in a timely manner, and more broadly share your belief that broadband connectivity is absolutely necessary to prepare our students for the 21st century. Sweetwater' s appeal of the Universal Service Administrative Company's denial of E-rate funding for funding years 2013, 2014, and 2015 is pending before the Commission ' s Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) . Bureau staff is currently conducting a detailed , de novo review of the documents submitted by Sweetwater and its service provider, Education Networks of America (ENA), as part of their respective appeals. The full record under consideration also includes a filing by AT&T disputing claims made in the appeals, as well as Sweetwater' s response to AT&T's filing. Bureau staff has also requested additional information from Sweetwater and ENA in order to ensure a complete and accurate record . The Bureau will thoroughly and promptly review that information once received and work to resolve the appeal. Resolving Sweetwater' s appeal in a timely fashion is a high priority for the Commission. Given the disputed nature of the record and the need to gather and review additional information from the parties, however, the matter may not be resolved by August 8, 2016. Commission rules authorize the Bureau to extend by up to 90 days the period for action in response to a decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company.' In order to complete a comprehensive review and reach a well-considered decision , the Bureau may need to extend the decision deadline. Thank you again for raising these concerns. I will continue to monitor the Bureau's progress on this matter and keep you apprised of the status. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, 1 See 47 CFR 54.724 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN The Honorable John J. Duncan U.S. House of Representatives 2207 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Duncan: July 27, 2016 Thank you for your inquiry into the status of the E-rate appeal filed by the Sweetwater City Schools Consortium (Sweetwater). As you know, the E-rate program, more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program, is dedicated to ensuring all of America's schools and libraries can purchase affordable telecommunications, internet access, and internal connections (WiFi equipment). I agree that it is important to resolve this matter in a timely manner, and more broadly share your belief that broadband connectivity is absolutely necessary to prepare our students for the 21st century. Sweetwater's appeal of the Universal Service Administrative Company ' s denial ofE-rate funding for funding years 2013 , 2014, and 2015 is pending before the Commission ' s Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau). Bureau staff is currently conducting a detailed, de novo review of the documents submitted by Sweetwater and its service provider, Education Networks of America (ENA), as part of their respective appeals. The full record under consideration also includes a filing by AT&T disputing claims made in the appeals, as well as Sweetwater's response to AT&T's filing. Bureau staff has also requested additional information from Sweetwater and ENA in order to ensure a complete and accurate record. The Bureau will thoroughly and promptly review that information once received and work to resolve the appeal. Resolving Sweetwater' s appeal in a timely fashion is a high priority for the Commission. Given the disputed nature of the record and the need to gather and review additional information from the parties, however, the matter may not be resolved by August 8, 2016. Commission rules authorize the Bureau to extend by up to 90 days the period for action in response to a decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company.1 In order to complete a comprehensive review and reach a well-considered decision , the Bureau may need to extend the decision deadline. Thank you again for raising these concerns . I will continue to monitor the Bureau's progress on this matter and keep you apprised of the status. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Sincerell'? ~heeler 1 See 47 CFR 54.724 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN The Honorable Scott DesJarlais U.S. House of Representatives 413 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman DesJarlais: July 27,2016 Thank you for your inquiry into the status of the E-rate appeal filed by the Sweetwater City Schools Consortium (Sweetwater). As you know, the E-rate program, more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program, is dedicated to ensuring all of America ' s schools and libraries can purchase affordable telecommunications, internet access, and internal connections (WiFi equipment). I agree that it is important to resolve this matter in a timely manner, and more broadly share your beliefthat broadband connectivity is absolutely necessary to prepare our students for the 21st century. Sweetwater' s appeal ofthe Universal Service Administrative Company ' s denial ofE-rate funding for funding years 2013 , 2014, and 2015 is pending before the Commission's Wire line Competition Bureau (Bureau). Bureau staff is currently conducting a detailed, de novo review of the documents submitted by Sweetwater and its service provider, Education Networks of America (ENA), as part of their respective appeals. The full record under consideration also includes a filing by AT&T disputing claims made in the appeals, as well as Sweetwater's response to AT&T's filing. Bureau staff has also requested additional information from Sweetwater and ENA in order to ensure a complete and accurate record. The Bureau will thoroughly and promptly review that information once received and work to resolve the appeal. Resolving Sweetwater' s appeal in a timely fashion is a high priority for the Commission. Given the disputed nature of the record and the need to gather and review additional information from the parties, however, the matter may not be resolved by August 8, 2016. Commission rules authorize the Bureau to extend by up to 90 days the period for action in response to a decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company.1 In order to complete a comprehensive review and reach a well-considered decision, the Bureau may need to extend the decision deadline. Thank you again for raising these concerns. I will continue to monitor the Bureau's progress on this matter and keep you apprised of the status. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. 1 See 47 CFR 54.724 OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN The Honorable Bob Corker United States Senate FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON July 27, 2016 425 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator Corker: Thank you for your inquiry into the status of the E-rate appeal filed by the Sweetwater City Schools Consortium (Sweetwater). As you know, the E-rate program, more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program, is dedicated to ensuring all of America's schools and libraries can purchase affordable telecommunications, internet access, and internal connections (WiFi equipment) . I agree that it is important to resolve this matter in a timely manner, and more broadly share your belief that broadband connectivity is absolutely necessary to prepare our students for the 21st century. Sweetwater' s appeal of the Universal Service Administrative Company ' s denial of E-rate funding for funding years 2013 , 2014, and 2015 is pending before the Commission's Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau). Bureau staff is currently conducting a detailed , de novo review of the documents submitted by Sweetwater and its service provider, Education Networks of America (ENA), as part of their respective appeals. The full record under consideration also includes a filing by AT&T disputing claims made in the appeals, as well as Sweetwater' s response to AT&T's filing. Bureau staff has also requested additional information from Sweetwater and ENA in order to ensure a complete and accurate record . The Bureau will thoroughl y and promptly review that information once received and work to resolve the appeal. Resolving Sweetwater's appeal in a timely fashion is a high priority for the Commission. Given the disputed nature of the record and the need to gather and review additional information from the parties, however, the matter may not be resolved by August 8, 2016. Commission rules authorize the Bureau to extend by up to 90 days the period for action in response to a decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company. ' In order to complete a comprehensive review and reach a well-considered decision , the Bureau may need to extend the decision deadline. Thank you again for raising these concerns. I will continue to monitor the Bureau's progress on this matter and keep you apprised of the status. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. 1 See 47 CFR 54.724 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON OFFI C E O F T HE C H AI RMAN The Honorable Jim Cooper U.S. House of Representatives 1536 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Cooper: July 27, 2016 Thank you for your inquiry into the status of theE-rate appeal filed by the Sweetwater City Schools Consortium (Sweetwater). As you know, the E-rate program, more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program, is dedicated to ensuring all of America's schools and libraries can purchase affordable telecommunications, internet access, and internal connections (WiFi equipment). I agree that it is important to resolve this matter in a timely manner, and more broadly share your belief that broadband connectivity is absolutely necessary to prepare our students for the 21st century. Sweetwater' s appeal ofthe Universal Service Administrative Company ' s denial ofE-rate funding for funding years 2013, 2014, and 2015 is pending before the Commission's Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau). Bureau staff is currently conducting a detailed, de novo review of the documents submitted by Sweetwater and its service provider, Education Networks of America (ENA), as part of their respective appeals. The full record under consideration also includes a filing by AT&T disputing claims made in the appeals, as well as Sweetwater's response to AT&T's filing. Bureau staff has also requested additional information from Sweetwater and ENA in order to ensure a complete and accurate record. The Bureau will thoroughly and promptly review that information once received and work to resolve the appeal. Resolving Sweetwater's appeal in a timely fashion is a high priority for the Commission. Given the disputed nature of the record and the need to gather and review additional information from the parties, however, the matter may not be resolved by August 8, 2016. Commission rules authorize the Bureau to extend by up to 90 days the period for action in response to a decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company. 1 In order to complete a comprehensive review and reach a well-considered decision , the Bureau may need to extend the decision deadline. Thank you again for raising these concerns. I will continue to monitor the Bureau's progress on this matter and keep you apprised of the status. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. 1 See 47 CFR 54.724 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN The Honorable Steve Cohen U.S. House of Representatives 2404 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Cohen : July 27, 2016 Thank you for your inquiry into the status of theE-rate appeal filed by the Sweetwater City Schools Consortium (Sweetwater) . As you know, the E-rate program, more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program, is dedicated to ensuring all of America ' s schools and libraries can purchase affordable telecommunications, internet access, and internal connections (WiFi equipment). I agree that it is important to resolve this matter in a timely manner, and more broadly share your belief that broadband connectivity is absolutely necessary to prepare our students for the 21st century. Sweetwater's appeal of the Universal Service Administrative Company' s denial of E-rate funding for funding years 2013 , 2014, and 2015 is pending before the Commission's Wire line Competition Bureau (Bureau). Bureau staff is currently conducting a detailed, de novo review of the documents submitted by Sweetwater and its service provider, Education Networks of America (ENA), as part of their respective appeals. The full record under consideration also includes a filing by AT&T disputing claims made in the appeals , as well as Sweetwater' s response to AT&T's filing. Bureau staff has also requested additional information from Sweetwater and ENA in order to ensure a complete and accurate record. The Bureau will thoroughly and promptly review that information once received and work to resolve the appeal. Resolving Sweetwater' s appeal in a timely fashion is a high priority for the Commission. Given the disputed nature of the record and the need to gather and review additional information from the parties, however, the matter may not be resolved by August 8, 2016 . Commission rules authorize the Bureau to extend by up to 90 days the period for action in response to a decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company. 1 In order to complete a comprehensive review and reach a well-considered decision, the Bureau may need to extend the decision deadline. Thank you again for raising these concerns. I will continue to monitor the Bureau's progress on this matter and keep you apprised of the status . Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, 1 See 47 CFR 54.724 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN The Honorable Marsha Blackburn U.S. House of Representatives 2266 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congresswoman Blackburn: July 27,2016 Thank you for your inquiry into the status of theE-rate appeal filed by the Sweetwater City Schools Consortium (Sweetwater). As you know, the E-rate program, more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program, is dedicated to ensuring all of America's schools and libraries can purchase affordable telecommunications, internet access, and internal connections (WiFi equipment). I agree that it is important to resolve this matter in a timely manner, and more broadly share your belief that broadband connectivity is absolutely necessary to prepare our students for the 21st century. Sweetwater's appeal of the Universal Service Administrative Company's denial ofE-rate funding for funding years 2013 , 2014, and 2015 is pending before the Commission ' s Wire line Competition Bureau (Bureau). Bureau staff is currently conducting a detailed, de novo review of the documents submitted by Sweetwater and its service provider, Education Networks of America (ENA), as part of their respective appeals. The full record under consideration also includes a filing by AT&T disputing claims made in the appeals , as well as Sweetwater' s response to AT&T's filing. Bureau staff has also requested additional information from Sweetwater and ENA in order to ensure a complete and accurate record. The Bureau will thoroughly and promptly review that information once received and work to resolve the appeal. Resolving Sweetwater' s appeal in a timely fashion is a high priority for the Commission. Given the disputed nature of the record and the need to gather and review additional information from the parties, however, the matter may not be resolved by August 8, 2016. Commission rules authorize the Bureau to extend by up to 90 days the period for action in response to a decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company.' In order to complete a comprehensive review and reach a well-considered decision, the Bureau may need to extend the decision deadline. Thank you again for raising these concerns . I will continue to monitor the Bureau's progress on this matter and keep you apprised of the status. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. ~ Sincere!~~~ ~heeler 1 See 47 CFR 54.724 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN The Honorable Diane Black U.S. House ofRepresentatives 1131 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congresswoman Black: July 27,2016 Thank you for your inquiry into the status of theE-rate appeal filed by the Sweetwater City Schools Consortium (Sweetwater). As you know, the E-rate program, more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program, is dedicated to ensuring all of America's schools and libraries can purchase affordable telecommunications, internet access, and internal connections (WiFi equipment) . I agree that it is important to resolve this matter in a timely manner, and more broadly share your belief that broadband connectivity is absolutely necessary to prepare our students for the 21st century. Sweetwater' s appeal ofthe Universal Service Administrative Company' s denial ofE-rate funding for funding years 2013 , 2014, and 2015 is pending before the Commission ' s Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau). Bureau staff is currently conducting a detailed, de novo review of the documents submitted by Sweetwater and its service provider, Education Networks of America (ENA), as part of their respective appeals. The full record under consideration also includes a filing by AT&T disputing claims made in the appeals, as well as Sweetwater's response to AT&T' s filing. Bureau staff has also requested additional information from Sweetwater and ENA in order to ensure a complete and accurate record. The Bureau will thoroughly and promptly review that information once received and work to resolve the appeal. Resolving Sweetwater' s appeal in a timely fashion is a high priority for the Commission. Given the disputed nature of the record and the need to gather and review additional information from the parties, however, the matter may not be resolved by August 8, 2016. Commission rules authorize the Bureau to extend by up to 90 days the period for action in response to a decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company.' In order to complete a comprehensive review and reach a well-considered decision, the Bureau may need to extend the decision deadline. Thank you again for raising these concerns. I will continue to monitor the Bureau's progress on this matter and keep you apprised of the status. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. 1 See 47 CFR 54 .724 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN The Honorable Lamar Alexander United States Senate 455 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator Alexander: July 27, 2016 Thank you for your inquiry into the status of theE-rate appeal filed by the Sweetwater City Schools Consortium (Sweetwater). As you know, the E-rate program, more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program, is dedicated to ensuring all of America ' s schools and libraries can purchase affordable telecommunications, internet access, and internal connections (WiFi equipment). I agree that it is important to resolve this matter in a timely manner, and more broadly share your belief that broadband connectivity is absolutely necessary to prepare our students for the 21st century. Sweetwater' s appeal of the Universal Service Administrative Company 's denial of E-rate funding for funding years 2013 , 2014, and 2015 is pending before the Commission ' s Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau). Bureau staff is currently conducting a deta iled, de novo review of the documents submitted by Sweetwater and its service provider, Education Networks of America (ENA), as part of their respective appeals . The full record under consideration also includes a filing by AT&T disputing claims made in the appeals, as well as Sweetwater's response to AT &T's filing. Bureau staff has also requested additional information from Sweetwater and ENA in order to ensure a complete and accurate record . The Bureau will thoroughly and promptly review that information once received and work to resolve the appeal. Reso lving Sweetwater 's appeal in a timel y fashion is a hi gh priority for the Commission. Given the disputed nature of the record and the need to gather and review additional information from the parties, however, the matter may not be resolved by August 8, 2016. Commission rules authorize the Bureau to extend by up to 90 days the period for action in response to a decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company. 1 In order to complete a comprehensive review and reach a well-considered decision, the Bureau may need to extend the decision deadline. Thank you again for rai s ing these concerns. I will continue to monitor the Bureau ' s progress on this matter and keep you appri sed of the status. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance . Tom Wheeler 1 See 47 CFR 54.724