OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Mark S. Kirk
United States Senate
524 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Kirk:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Mark S. Kirk
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Shelley Moore Capito
United States Senate
172 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Capito:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Shelley Moore Capito
T appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Richard M. Burr
United States Senate
217 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Burr:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is conmiitted to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Conmiission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Richard M. Burr
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Tammy Baldwin
United States Senate
717 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Baldwin:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Tammy Baldwin
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Roy Blunt
United States Senate
260 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Blunt:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Conmiission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Roy Blunt
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable John Boozman
United States Senate
141 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Boozman:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable John Boozman
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Thad Cochran
United States Senate
113 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Cochran:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Thad Cochran
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Steve Dames
United States Senate
320 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Dames:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Steve Dames
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Joni Ernst
United States Senate
111 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Ernst:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to iimnediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase IT support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Joni Ernst
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Deb Fischer
United States Senate
454 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Fischer:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase IT support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Deb Fischer
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Cory Gardner
United States Senate
354 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Gardner:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Cory Gardner
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Heidi Heitkamp
United States Senate
110 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Heitkamp:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Conmiission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Heidi Heitkamp
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if! can be of
any further assistance.
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Ron Johnson
United States Senate
328 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Johnson:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Ron Johnson
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Angus King
United States Senate
133 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator King:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Conimission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase TI, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Conmiission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase TI, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Angus King
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Amy Klobuchar
United States Senate
302 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Kiobuchar:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase IT may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase TI, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Amy Kiobuchar
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Joe Manchin
United States Senate
306 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Manchin:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Conimission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase H, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Joe Manchin
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Tom eeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Claire McCaskill
United States Senate
730 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator McCaskill:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Claire McCaskill
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Jerry Moran
United States Senate
521 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Moran:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Conimission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Jerry Moran
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Tom eeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Gary Peters
United States Senate
724 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Peters:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Gary Peters
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH JNGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Pat Roberts
United States Senate
109 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Roberts:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Pat Roberts
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Marco Rubio
United States Senate
284 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Rubio:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Marco Rubio
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Thom Tillis
United States Senate
185 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Tillis:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase IT, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase TI support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Thom Tillis
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH I NGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable David Vitter
United States Senate
516 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Vitter:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable David Vitter
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if! can be of
any further assistance.
Tom Wheeler
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Mark Warner
United States Senate
475 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Warner:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Mark Warner
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Roger Wicker
United States Senate
555 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Wicker:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase II may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase II, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase II. I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Roger Wicker
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN
September 14, 2016
The Honorable Ron Wyden
United States Senate
221 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Wyden:
Thank you for your letter regarding the importance of mobile broadband networks to
support agriculture and rural America, as well as your views regarding the opportunity that a
Mobility Fund Phase IT may provide in achieving that goal.
Americans rely more and more on mobile broadband service. As providers roll-out more
robust wireless networks, they are providing greater broadband speeds, efficiency, capacity, and
a wealth of innovative features. The Commission is committed to ensuring that Americans
living and working in rural areas have access to these mobile broadband networks that are
increasingly essential for full participation in today's society and economy.
The Mobility Fund is dedicated to ensuring availability of mobile broadband networks in
areas where a private-sector business case is lacking. In the Mobility Fund Phase I, the
Commission set aside $300 million in one-time support to immediately accelerate deployment of
networks for mobile voice and broadband services in unserved areas. To maximize coverage of
unserved road miles within the $300 million budget, Mobility Fund Phase I included a variety of
eligible road miles, in addition to primary and secondary roads. Specifically, as requested in
comments received from the public, the Commission included 4WD vehicular trails, service
drives, and private roads for service vehicles. The inclusion of these road-mile categories was
particularly important in some rural areas because they added, among other things, unpaved dirt
trails where a four-wheel vehicle is required, service drives that typically connect to highways
and other types of roads, and private roads that are used in areas with logging, mining, oil fields,
and ranches.
Going forward, as the Commission considers a Mobility Fund Phase TI, we will look to
how best maximize limited resources and to promote mobile voice and broadband in areas -
including rural communities with agricultural activity - where it might not otherwise be
sustained or extended without federal support. For example, the Commission continues to
examine the structure and operational details for Phase II, including the proper distribution
methodology, eligible geographic areas and providers, and public interest obligations. No
decisions have been made on how best to target Mobility Fund Phase II support, but Commission
staff is continuing the process of reviewing the record to consider possible next steps for a
Mobility Fund Phase IL I am hopeful we will conclude our proceeding by year end.
Page 2-The Honorable Ron Wyden
I appreciate your interest and concerns in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of
any further assistance.