United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 17-1126 September Term, 2016
FCC-17-43
Filed On:  July 19, 2017
Sprint Corporation and Windstream Services,
LLC,
Petitioners
v.
Federal Communications Commission and
United States of America,
Respondents
BEFORE: Rogers, Tatel, and Griffith, Circuit Judges
O R D E R
Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss and the response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted.  In the motion to dismiss,
respondents represent that petitioners may challenge all aspects of the order under
review after it is published in the Federal Register, and petitioners have filed a timely
petition for review that is now pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the
Eighth Circuit.  See Ad Hoc Telecomms. Users Comm., et al. v. FCC (8th Cir. No. 17-
2342).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.  The Clerk
is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc.  See Fed. R. App.
P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Per Curiam
USCA Case #17-1126      Document #1684850            Filed: 07/19/2017      Page 1 of 1