THE OFFICE CHAIRMAN OF the viewers. incoherent sharing Commission s Commission s ordinance, sharing currently and exclusive FCC MThs, Meeting consistent owners by invest. occupants while (MThs). apartments, U.S. divide competitive Dear Washington, Speaker 1236 broadly ordinance local House could Speaker Longworth extends Unfortunately, first, Second, Third, F including This of and With of to Nancy or The being actions wiring Closing unused in-use with only strategy promoting take promote decades, broadband of condominiums, broadband is these DC we required Declaratory and Pelosi: in rules framework Representatives to federal used we Pelosi to to arrangements. adopted wiring to potential House response those wiring. the 20515 as the avoiding accelerate principles regarding adopted increase regarding the to Congress noted digital extent throughout access the providers, law provide who access deployment deters Office FEDERAL a Ruling to sharing to actions in Notice and overly a and broadband live protect divide that to the your in the Declaratory your control and and broadband policy. Building service. customers mind, office and deployment meaning it exclusivity does this of regarding letter of greater the letter, burdensome requires has of the work in-use Proposed COMMUNICATIONS of proceeding, Commission the not buildings high-speed been deployment technical regarding Specifically, cable January we Ruling deployment Commission of WASHINGTON consumer and preempt in wiring. the revenue preempted my its MThs. agreements of wiring infrastructure including Rulemaking sharing sharing next-generation ordinance. top known 3, clarifying integrity the the broadband any have 2020 to And priority choice sharing the in Commission s City and MThs, took of mandates other Article as residential encouraged yet regarding Declaratory building-owned investment. of multiple of that On that for COMMISSION since several on agreements aspect cable to San so Americans one 52, the the seeks networks residents long that Francisco becoming an systems rooftop MThs other, hand, Commission tenant steps of facilities-based actions Ruling reduce as outlier public Article It those MThs between undercuts it at of before and and environments inside living facilities, wouldn t for its pursued MThs. Chairman. to input found incentives San threatens services 52, actions July promote the and I welcomes wiring and Francisco building including circulated benefit on that the their Open competition and an working claim actions are within to the required that improve That of that state the the is the in Page 2 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi draft Declaratory Ruling to my colleagues, the city also refused to say that its ordinance didn  t mandate the sharing of in-use wiring. This Schrödinger s cat strategy finally ended just before the Conmiission vote, when the city at long last formally asserted that its ordinance did not require the sharing of in-use wiring. The language of the ordinance itself suggests otherwise. But if the city is correct, then there is no reason for the city to object to our narrow ruling. It is difficult to understand how anyone could be harmed by a decision to preempt a city mandate that the city itself claims doesn t exist. And if the city isn t correct if the ordinance does indeed require the sharing of in-use wiring then it is also difficult to understand how the city could object to our ruling. After all, despite having every opportunity to mount a substantive defense of an in-use wiring sharing mandate, the city failed to do so. I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance. Sincerely, v (J