*Pages 1--2 from  Microsoft Word - 15902*
 Federal  Communications  Commission  FCC  00-  80 
 Before  the  FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 
 Washington,  D.  C.  20554 


 In  re  Applications  of  )  ) 
 GTE  Mobilnet  of  Terre  Haute  )  Limited  Partnership  )  File  No.  06667-  CL-  MP-  92 
 Duluth  MSA  Limited  Partnership  )  File  No.  06754-  CL-  MP-  92  Toledo  Cellular  Telephone  Company  )  File  No.  06726-  CL-  MP-  92 
 Saco  River  Cellular  Company  )  Telephone  Company  )  File  No.  05635-  CL-  MP-  92 
 Telephone  Cellular  )  Communications,  Inc.  )  File  No.  05468-  CL-  MP-  92 
 Independent  Cellular  Network,  Inc.  )  File  Nos.  06065-  CL-  MP-  92,  )  06625-  CL-  MP-  92 
 Albany  Telephone  Company  )  File  Nos.  06014-  CL-  MP-  92,  )  05851-  CL-  MP-  92 
 Alltel  Mobile  Communications  )  of  Florida  )  File  No.  06428-  CL-  MP-  92 
 Brownsville  Cellular  )  Telephone  Company  )  File  No.  06042-  CL-  MP-  92 
 Memphis  Cellular  Telephone  Company  )  File  No.  06369-  CL-  MP-  92  Fayetteville  MSA  Limited  Partnership  )  File  No.  06070-  CL-  MP-  92 
 McAllen-  Edinburgh-  Mission  SMSA  )  Limited  Partnership  )  File  No.  06332-  CL-  MP-  92 
 Metroplex  Telephone  Company  )  File  No.  06629-  CL-  MP-  92  McCaw  Communications  of  ) 
 Ft.  Pierce,  Inc.  )  File  No.  06489-  CL-  MP-  92  Mobile  MSA  Limited  Partnership  )  File  No.  06544-  CL-  MP-  92 
 Interstate  Mobilephone  Company  )  File  No.  06499-  CL-  MP-  92  Utica  Telephone  Company  )  File  No.  06569-  CL-  MP-  92 
 )  For  major  modifications  of  existing  ) 
 MSA  cellular  systems  ) 


 ORDER 
 Adopted:  March  3,  2000  Released:  March  14,  2000 
 By  the  Commission: 
 1.  The  Commission  has  before  it  an  Application  for  Review,  filed  on  December  3,  1992,  by  The  Committee  for  Effective  Cellular  Rules  (CECR).  CECR  seeks  review  of  an  order  by  the 
 former  Mobile  Services  Division  of  the  Common  Carrier  Bureau  (Bureau)  denying  various  CECR  petitions  to  dismiss,  deny,  or  defer  the  above-  captioned  applications  to  modify  existing  cellular 
 systems.  1 
 1  GTE  Mobilnet  of  Terre  Haute  Limited  Partnership,  7  FCC  Rcd.  7127  (1992). 
1
 Federal  Communications  Commission  FCC  00-  80 
 2 
 2.  CECR  presents  no  arguments  in  its  Application  for  Review  that  would  lead  us  to  change  the  Bureau’s  decision.  We  therefore  deny  CECR’s  Application  for  Review  and  affirm  the 
 Bureau’s  decision  for  the  reasons  stated  therein. 
 3.  Accordingly,  pursuant  to  section  5(  c)(  5)  of  the  Communications  Act,  as  amended,  47  U.  S.  C.  §  155(  c)(  5),  and  section  1.115(  g)  of  the  Commission’s  rules,  47  C.  F.  R.  §  1.  115(  g),  the 
 Application  for  Review  filed  by  The  Committee  for  Effective  Cellular  Rules  on  December  3,  1992  IS  DENIED. 


 FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 
 Magalie  Roman  Salas  Secretary 
2