*Pages 1--2 from  Microsoft Word - 9156.doc*
 Federal  Communications  Commission  FCC  01-  176 
 Before  the 
 Federal  Communications  Commission 
 Washington,  D.  C.  20554 


 In  the  Matter  of 
 United  Corporation  of  Southern  California, 
 and 
 James  A.  Kay,  Jr., 
 Complainants, 
 v. 
 Jim  Doering  d/  b/  a  J.  Doering  Communications, 
 and 
 Harold  Pick  d/  b/  a  Communications  Consultants 
 Systems, 


 Defendants. 


 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 ) 


 File  No.  WB/  ENF-  F-  99-  0006 


 ORDER  ON  REVIEW 
 Adopted:  May  22,  2001  Released:  May  24,  2001 
 By  the  Commission:  Commissioner  Tristani  concurring  in  the  result. 
 I.  INTRODUCTION 
 1.  In  this  Order,  we  deny  an  Application  for  Review  filed  by  James  A.  Kay,  Jr.  (“  Kay”),  1 
 pursuant  to  section  1.115  of  the  Commission’s  rules.  2  Kay  requests  review  of  an  October  21,  1999,  letter 
 order  by  the  Wireless  Telecommunications  Bureau,  3  which  dismissed  a  complaint  filed  by  him  and  United 
 Corporation  of  Southern  California  against  Jim  Doering  d/  b/  a  Doering  Communications  and  Harold  Pick 
 d/  b/  a  Communications  Consultants  Systems  (collectively,  “Respondents”)  pursuant  to  section  208  of  the 
 Communications  Act  of  1934,  as  amended  (“  the  Act”).  4  The  Bureau  determined  in  the  Letter  Order  that  the 


 1  Application  for  Review,  File  No.  WB/  ENF-  F-  99-  0006  (filed  Nov.  22,  1999). 
 2  47  C.  F.  R.  §1.115. 
 3  United  Corporation  of  Southern  California  v.  Jim  Doering  d/  b/  a  Doering  Communications,  Letter  Order, 
 WTB/  ENF-  F-  99-  006  (Wireless  Tel.  Bur.  Oct  21,  1999)  (“  Letter  Order”). 
 4  47  U.  S.  C.  §208. 
1
 Federal  Communications  Commission  FCC  01-  176 
 2 
 complaint  did  not  allege  that  any  specific  provisions  of  the  Act  or  the  Commission’s  rules  had  been  violated 
 by  the  Respondents.  The  Bureau  also  concluded  that  the  matters  raised  in  the  complaint  did  not  warrant 
 exercise  of  the  Commission’s  discretion  to  initiate  enforcement  actions  against  the  Respondents. 


 2.  Upon  careful  review  of  the  Application  for  Review  and  the  entire  record  herein,  we 
 conclude  that  Kay  has  failed  to  demonstrate  that  the  Wireless  Telecommunications  Bureau  erred.  The 
 Wireless  Telecommunications  Bureau  properly  decided  the  matters  raised  below,  and  we  uphold  its  decision 
 for  the  reasons  stated  in  its  Letter  Order. 


 3.  Accordingly,  IT  IS  ORDERED,  pursuant  to  section  4(  i),  4(  j),  208,  and  503  of  the  Act,  47 
 U.  S.  C.  §§  154(  i),  154(  j),  208,  503,  and  section  1.115(  g)  of  the  Commission’s  rules,  47  C.  F.  R.  §  1.115(  g), 
 that  the  Application  for  Review  by  United  Corporation  of  Southern  California  and  James  A.  Kay,  Jr.  IS 
 DENIED  and  this  proceeding  IS  TERMINATED  WITH  PREJUDICE. 


 FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 
 Magalie  Roman  Salas 
 Secretary 
2