*Pages 1--2 from  Microsoft Word - 10528.doc*
 Federal  Communications  Commission  FCC  01-  211 
 Before  the  Federal  Communications  Commission 
 Washington,  D.  C.  20554 
 In  re  Applications  of  ) 
 ) 
 Various  Subsidiaries  and  Affiliates  of  )  File  Nos.  0000013318 
 GEOTEK  COMMUNICATIONS,  INC.,  )  0000013319 
 Debtor-  In-  Possession,  )  0000013321 
 Assignors,  )  0000013499 
 )  0000013499 
 and  )  0000013504 
 )  0000014139 
 WILMINGTON  TRUST  COMPANY  or  )  911823 
 HUGHES  ELECTRONICS  CORPORATION,  )  911825 
 Assignees,  )  911827 
 ) 
 ) 
 In  re  Applications  of  ) 
 ) 
 WILMINGTON  TRUST  COMPANY  or  )  File  Nos.  911830 
 HUGHES  ELECTRONICS  CORPORATION,  )  911831 
 Assignors,  )  911832  )  911833 


 and  ) 
 ) 
 FCI  900,  INC.  ) 
 Assignee,  ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 For  Consent  to  Assignment  of  900  MHz  ) 
 Specialized  Mobile  Radio  Licenses  ) 


 MEMORANDUM  OPINION  AND  ORDER 
 Adopted:  July  24,  2001  Released:  July  27,  2001 
 By  the  Commission: 
 1.  The  Commission  has  before  it  an  Application  for  Review  filed  on  February  8, 
 2001,  by  Hugh  P.  Taylor  (“  Taylor”).  1  Taylor  requests  review  of  a  January  8,  2001  order  of  the 


 1  Application  for  Review  (filed  Feb.  8,  2001)  (“  Application  for  Review”). 
1
 Federal  Communications  Commission  FCC  01-  211 
 2 
 Wireless  Telecommunications  Bureau  denying  Taylor’s  petition  to  reconsider  the  Bureau’s 
 January  14,  2000  Memorandum  Opinion  and  Order  granting  the  request  to  assign  licenses  held  by 
 Geotek  Communications,  Inc.  to  Geotek’s  primary  secured  creditors  (“  the  Creditors”),  and 
 further  to  assign  certain  of  those  licenses  from  the  Creditors  to  FCI  900,  Inc.,  a  subsidiary  of 
 Nextel  Communications,  Inc.  (“  Nextel”).  2 


 2.  Taylor  concedes  that  he  is  raising  “[  n]  o  new  facts.”  3  He  also  does  not  argue  that  there  has  been  an  erroneous  finding  as  to  an  important  or  material  question  of  fact  or  cite  any  other  factor 
 list  ed  in  our  rules  warrant  ing  Commission  review.  4  The  Application  for  Review  provides  no  new  information  that  had  not  been  previously  considered,  and  presents  no  arguments  that  would  lead  us  to 
 reverse  the  decision  of  the  Bureau.  The  matters  raised  by  Taylor  were  properly  decided  on  delegated  authority  on  January  14,  2000,  and  again  on  January  8,  2001,  and  we  uphold  the  underlying  action  for 
 the  reasons  stated  therein. 
 3.  ACCORDINGLY,  IT  IS  ORDERED  that,  pursuant  to  sections  4(  i),  5(  c)(  5),  309, 
 and  310(  d)  of  the  Communications  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  47  U.  S.  C.  §§  154(  i),  155(  c)(  5), 
 309,  and  310(  d),  and  Section  1.115  of  the  Commission’s  Rules,  47  C.  F.  R.  §  1.115,  the 
 Application  for  Review  filed  on  February  8,  2001,  by  Hugh  P.  Taylor  IS  DENIED. 


 FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 


 Magalie  Roman  Salas 
 Secretary 


 2  See  Geotek  Communications,  Inc.,  Order  on  Reconsideration,  DA  01-  51  (WTB  2001)  (“  Order  on  Reconsideration”), 
 and  Geotek  Communications,  Inc.,  Memorandum  Opinion  and  Order,  15  FCC  Rcd  790  (WTB  2000)  (“  MO&  O”). 
 3  Application  for  Review  at  8. 


 4  See  47  C.  F.  R.  §  1.115  (b)(  2)  (listing  factors  warranting  Commission  consideration  of  the  questions  presented  in 
 application  for  review). 
2