*Pages 1--1 from Microsoft Word - 26770* Federal Communications Commission FCC 03- 80 STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER KEVIN J. MARTIN Re: Application by SBC Communications Inc., Nevada Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc., for Authorization To Provide In- Region, Inc., for Authorization To Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in Nevada (WC Docket No. 03- 10) Today we grant SBC authority to provide in- region, interLATA service originating in the State of Nevada. I commend the Nevada Public Utilities Commission for their hard work. The Commission approves SBC’s application in Nevada based on the Commission’s precedent in the BellSouth Second Louisiana Order 1 Under that decision, a BOC can satisfy its market- opening requirements by showing that consumers are using broadband PCS as a substitute for wireline telephone service. This showing can be demonstrated in the form of: (i) surveys identifying customers that had used broadband PCS in lieu of wireline service; and (ii) evidence of marketing efforts by broadband PCS providers designed to induce replacement of wireline service with broadband PCS service. I have some trepidation with the Commission’s decision and precedent in the BellSouth Second Louisiana Order. First, I would prefer a more comprehensive and timely filed survey. Moreover, our finding of Track A compliance relies solely on the presence of just one PCS provider. Given that this provider has just filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, I have some concerns with the long- term health of competition in Nevada. At this point, however, no evidence exists indicating that the PCS provider has stopped offering or providing service in the state. 1 See Application by BellSouth Corporation, et al., Pursuant to Section 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, To Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in Louisiana, CC Docket 98- 121, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 20599, 20633- 35 (1998)( BellSouth Second Louisiana Order). 1