*Pages 1--116 from Microsoft Word - 60422.doc* Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 1 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 In the Matter of Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MB Docket No. 87- 268 SEVENTH FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING Adopted: October 10, 2006 Released: October 20, 2006 Comment Date: January 11, 2007 Reply Comment Date: February 12, 2007 By the Commission: Commissioner McDowell issuing a statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY........................................................................................ 3 A. The DTV Transition............................................................................................................. 3 B. The Channel Election Process ............................................................................................. 5 III. PROPOSED DTV TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS .................................................................... 13 A. Allotment Methodology and Evaluation of Interference Conflicts ................................... 17 B. Requests for Alternative Channel Assignments ................................................................ 25 C. Requests to Change Certified Facilities............................................................................. 28 D. Resolution of TCDs Pending After Round Three.............................................................. 30 E. International Coordination ................................................................................................ 48 F. Treatment of New Licensees and Permittees and Pending Applications for New Stations............................................................................................................................... 50 IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS ................................................................................................... 55 A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis........................................................................ 55 B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis ........................................................... 56 C. Ex Parte Rules.................................................................................................................... 57 D. Filing Requirements........................................................................................................... 58 V. ORDERING CLAUSES.......................................................................................................... 64 1 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 2 APPENDICES Appendix A: Proposed Rule Changes Appendix B: Proposed DTV Table of Allotments Information Appendix C: Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis I. INTRODUCTION 1. By this action, the Commission undertakes the final step in the channel election process established in its Second DTV Periodic Report and Order 1 and begins the final stage of the transition of the nation’s broadcast television system from analog to digital television (“ DTV”). Specifically, in this Seventh Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making (“ Notice” or “Seventh FNPRM”), the Commission proposes a new DTV Table of Allotments (“ DTV Table”), 2 providing all eligible stations with channels for DTV operations after the DTV transition. 2. In developing the proposed new allotments, the Commission has attempted to accommodate broadcasters’ channel preferences as well as their replication and maximization service area certifications (made via FCC Form 381). 3 Our proposed DTV Table is based upon the tentative channel designations (“ TCDs”) announced for eligible broadcast licensees and permittees (collectively, “licensees”) through the channel election process, along with our efforts to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure that broadcasters provide the best possible service to the public, including service to local communities. 4 Once effective, the proposed DTV Table will guide stations in determining their build- out obligations. The proposed DTV Table 5 will ultimately replace the existing DTV Table 6 at the end of the DTV transition, when analog transmissions by full- power television broadcast licensees must cease. 7 The current DTV Table will govern stations’ DTV operations until the end of the DTV transition. 1 Second Periodic Review of the Commission’s Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television, MB Docket No. 03- 15, Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 18279, 18281 (2004) (“ Second DTV Periodic Report and Order”). 2 See infra, Appendix A: Proposed Rule Changes (proposed revision to 47 C. F. R. § 73. 622); Appendix B: Proposed DTV Table of Allotments Information. 3 See infra note 18. 4 See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18307, ¶ 65. 5 See infra, Appendix A: Proposed Rule Changes (proposed revision to 47 C. F. R. § 73. 622( b)). 6 The current DTV Table of Allotments is contained in Section 73. 622( b) of the Commission’s rules; 47 C. F. R. § 73. 622( b). We note that, at the end of the transition, the current NTSC Table, contained in Section 73. 606 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. § 73. 606( b), will become obsolete. We will address any rule amendments necessitated by the end of analog service in a later proceeding. 7 47 U. S. C. § 309( j)( 14)( A) (“ A full- power television broadcast license that authorizes analog television service may not be renewed to authorize such service for a period that extends beyond February 17, 2009.”) 2 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 3 II. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY A. The DTV Transition 3. The Commission established the existing DTV Table in the 1997 Sixth Report and Order as part of its DTV transition plan. 8 In creating the existing DTV Table, the Commission sought to accommodate all eligible, full- service broadcasters with a second channel to provide DTV service in addition to their existing, analog service. 9 In addition, the Commission initiated a process by which the amount of spectrum devoted to the television broadcast service 10 would eventually be reduced. As a result, television broadcast operations will be limited to the “core spectrum” (i. e., channels 2- 51) after the end of the transition, 11 enabling the recovery of a total of 108 MHz of spectrum (i. e., channels 52- 69). 12 4. As required by statute, the second channel allotted in the existing DTV Table is for use during the DTV transition, after which each licensee must return to broadcasting on a single, six MHz channel. 13 In specifying the second channels that broadcasters received for transitional use, the Commission attempted to enable stations to “replicate” the service area of their existing NTSC operations, i. e., to provide DTV service to an area that is comparable to their 8 Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact Upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service, MM Docket No. 87- 268, Sixth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 14588 (1997) (“ Sixth Report and Order”); see also 47 C. F. R. § 73.622. Simultaneous with the adoption of the Sixth Report and Order, the Commission announced DTV channel assignments for eligible licensees in the Fifth Report and Order in the same docket. See Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service, MM Docket No. 87- 268, Fifth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 12809, 12892, app. E (1997) (“ Fifth Report and Order”). 9 Eligibility to receive a second channel for DTV operations was limited to existing broadcasters. See 47 U. S. C. § 336( a)( 1); see also Fifth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12815, ¶ 13. 10 See 47 U. S. C. § 153( 49) (defining “television service” as encompassing both “analog television service” and “digital television service”). See also 47 U. S. C. § 336 and note (describing the licenses and regulations associated with the “advanced television service” to transition from analog to digital service). 11 See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18292, ¶ 33. The “core spectrum” is comprised of low- VHF channels 2 to 4 (54- 72 MHz) and 5 to 6 (76- 88 MHZ), VHF channels 7 to 13 (174- 216 MHz) and UHF channels 14- 51 (470- 698 MHz), but does not include TV channel 37 (608- 614 MHz), which is used for radio astronomy research. In order to protect sensitive radio astronomy operations, TV Channel 37 is not used for NTSC or DTV service. See DTV Sixth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 7419, ¶ 5; see also 47 C. F. R. § 73. 603( c). 12 Channels 60- 69 (746- 806 MHz) were reallocated for public safety and wireless communications services in 1998. See Reallocation of Television Channels 60- 69, the 746- 806 MHz Band, ET Docket No. 97- 157, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 22953 (1998). Channels 52- 59 were reallocated for new wireless services in 2001. See Reallocation and Service Rules for the 698- 746 MHz Spectrum Band (Television Channels 52- 59), GN Docket No. 01- 74, Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 1022 (2002). Broadcast licensees must cease operations outside the core spectrum after February 17, 2009, thereby making that spectrum available for public safety and commercial wireless uses. See 47 U. S. C. § 337( e)( 1) (“ Any full- power television station licensee that holds a television broadcast license to operate between 698 and 806 megahertz may not operate at that frequency after February 17, 2009.”). 13 See 47 U. S. C. § 336( c) (requiring “that either the additional license or the original license held by the licensee be surrendered to the Commission”); see also Fifth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12849- 50, ¶ 97. In practice, some licensees’ ultimate DTV channels will be entirely different channels – not their NTSC channels or the channels allotted to them for DTV transmission during the transition. 3 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 4 existing NTSC service area. The existing DTV Table also was designed to minimize interference to both existing analog TV and new DTV service. The existing DTV Table, codified in Section 73.622( b) of the Commission’s rules, was developed using the policies adopted in the Sixth Report and Order and a computer allotment methodology. 14 The details of each station’s channel assignment under the existing DTV Table, including technical facilities and predicted service and interference information, were set forth in the initial Appendix B of the Sixth Report and Order (“ initial Appendix B”). 15 B. The Channel Election Process 5. Broadcast licensees selected their ultimate (i. e. post- transition) DTV channel inside the core spectrum through the channel election process established by the Commission in the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order. Under this process, licensees elected their preferred post- transition channel during one of three rounds. Channel elections that could be approved, as well as “best available” channels selected by Commission staff, were locked in as TCDs and protected against new interference from subsequent channel elections with a strong presumption that a station’s TCD would be its channel assignment proposed in the new DTV Table. 16 Because the final channel allotments can be established only through a rulemaking proceeding, we propose the new DTV Table as an amendment to Section 73.622 in this Seventh FNPRM in the DTV docket. 6. The channel election process was designed to be carried out in seven steps, culminating in this rulemaking, the seventh and final step. In order to facilitate the selection of channels and the development of a final DTV Table, prior to the commencement of the first step of the channel election process, the Media Bureau announced a freeze on the filing of certain NTSC and DTV requests for allotment or service area changes. 17 14 47 C. F. R. § 73.622( b). 15 See Sixth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 14693, app. B. The initial Appendix B was amended in 1998. See Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact Upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service, MM Docket No. 87- 268, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration of the Sixth Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 7418 (1998) (“ DTV Sixth Memorandum Opinion and Order”) and Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact Upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service, MM Docket No. 87- 268, Second Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration of the Fifth and Sixth Report and Orders, 14 FCC Rcd 1348 (1998). 16 See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18298, ¶ 46 n. 96. 17 See Public Notice, “Freeze on the Filing of Certain TV and DTV Requests for Allotment or Service Area Changes,” 19 FCC Rcd 14810, 14810- 11 (MB 2004) (“ August 2004 Filing Freeze PN”). Pursuant to the freeze, parties were precluded from filing the following items: (i) petitions for rulemaking to change DTV channels within the current DTV Table, (ii) petitions for rulemaking to establish a new DTV channel allotment, (iii) petitions for rulemaking to swap in- core DTV and NTSC channels; (iv) applications to change DTV channel allotments among two or more licensees; (v) petitions for rulemaking by licensees/ permittees to change NTSC channels or communities of license; (vi) applications to maximize DTV or analog TV facilities; and (vii) certain Class A television station applications. In the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, the Commission noted that it would continue to process rulemakings in which a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“ NPRM”) had been issued prior to the adoption of the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, but ordered the dismissal of all pending petitions to change the NTSC Table of Allotments (“ NTSC Table”) in which a NPRM had not yet been issued. Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18308, ¶ 68. We note that petitions for reconsideration are pending before the Commission on this issue in MB Docket No. 03- 15. See, e. g., ACME Communications Petition for Reconsideration; (continued….) 4 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 5 7. The first step of the channel election process addressed preliminary matters and required all licensees to file a certification (via FCC Form 381) in order to define their post-transition facility. 18 In these certifications, licensees had to decide whether they would (1) replicate their allotted facilities, (2) maximize to their currently authorized facilities, 19 or (3) reduce to a currently authorized smaller facility. 8. The second step of the channel election process was the first round of channel elections, in which only in- core licensees – those with at least one in- core channel – could participate. In- core licensees that participated in round one filed their channel elections (via FCC Form 382) by February 10, 2005. First- round electors were not permitted to elect a channel that was not assigned to them unless rights to that channel were obtained through a negotiated channel agreement (“ NCA”) with another licensee. At the close of the first round elections, the Commission announced 1,554 TCDs, 20 which included channels elected through 25 NCAs. 21 9. In the third step, the Commission analyzed the interference conflicts arising out of the first round and offered licensees an opportunity to resolve them (via FCC Form 383). After reviewing the first round conflicts, the Commission announced an additional 159 TCDs, bringing the total number of TCDs to 1,713. 22 10. The fourth step of the channel election process was the second round of elections, in which the remaining licensees made their elections. Licensees that participated in this round filed their channel elections (via FCC Form 384) by October 31, 2005. 11. In the fifth step, the Commission analyzed the interference conflicts arising out of the second- round elections and announced 75 TCDs, which included channels elected through (Continued from previous page) Television Capital Corporation of Portland Petition for Reconsideration; and Ramar Communications Petition for Reconsideration, all filed on Nov. 3, 2004. 18 Licensees were required to file their certifications (via FCC Form 381) by November 5, 2004. See Public Notice, “DTV Channel Election Information and Deadlines,” 19 FCC Rcd 19569 (MB 2004) (“ Certification Deadline PN”). Stations that did not submit certification forms by the deadline were evaluated based on replication facilities. See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18296, ¶ 41. 19 Many stations have applied for and been granted authorization to operate at facilities that are different from the facilities that were specified for their operation in the initial DTV Table and Appendix B, as amended in 1998. In most cases, the facilities allowed under these new authorizations allow stations to “maximize” their service coverage to reach a larger population than the facilities specified in the initial DTV Table and Appendix B. 20 Public Notice, “DTV Tentative Channel Designations for 1, 554 Stations Participating in the First Round of DTV Channel Elections,” 20 FCC Rcd 10983 (MB 2005). 21 By Order released on June 8, 2005, the Media Bureau approved 25 NCAs for the first round and rejected 12 NCAs, sending those licensees to their contingent round one election or, if necessary, to round two. Negotiated Channel Election Arrangements, MM Docket No. 03- 15, Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 10141, 10142 (MB 2005) (“ Round One NCA Order”). 22 Public Notice, “Tentative Digital Channel Designations for Stations Participating in the First Round of DTV Channel Elections and Second Round Election Filing Deadline,” 20 FCC Rcd 15735 (MB 2005) (“ First Round TCD PN”). 5 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 6 two NCAs. 23 The Commission subsequently announced the consolidated total of first- and second- round TCDs to be 1,789. 24 12. The sixth step of the channel election process was the third and final round of elections, in which licensees without a TCD after rounds one and two, as well as certain other eligible licensees, 25 filed a final channel election preference. 26 Licensees that participated in the third round filed their channel elections (via FCC Form 386) by May 26, 2006. At the close of the third round, the Commission announced 20 TCDs for eligible licensees, leaving only four eligible stations without a TCD. 27 III. PROPOSED DTV TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS 13. In this Seventh FNPRM, we now undertake the seventh and final step of the channel election process by proposing a new DTV Table. The proposed DTV Table includes a channel for each eligible broadcast television station and is set forth in the proposed rules in Appendix A. The specific technical facilities – effective radiated power (“ ERP”), antenna height above average terrain (“ antenna HAAT”), antenna radiation pattern, and geographic coordinates at which stations would be allowed to operate under this Table – are set forth in Appendix B. Appendix B also includes information on service area and population coverage. 14. We believe that our proposed new DTV Table achieves the goals set forth for the channel election process. 28 First, the proposed new DTV Table provides all eligible stations with channels for DTV operations after the DTV transition. Second, we believe that our proposed new DTV Table is the result of informed decisions by licensees when making their channel elections and that licensees benefited from the clarity and transparency of the channel election process. Third, we believe our proposed new DTV Table recognizes industry expectations by 23 Public Notice, “Tentative Digital Channel Designations for Stations Participating in the Second Round of DTV Channel Elections and Third Round Election Filing Deadline,” DA 06- 991 at 2- 4 (MB rel. May 5, 2006) (“ Second Round TCD PN”). The Commission received two NCAs: one for Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the other for San Francisco, California. The Commission approved the Philadelphia NCA in full, and the San Francisco NCA in part. 24 Public Notice, “Tentative Digital Channel Designations for Stations Participating in the First and Second Rounds of the DTV Channel Election Process,” DA 06- 1082 (MB rel. May 23, 2006). One additional first round TCD was announced in addition to the 75 second round TCDs. 25 Licensees with a TCD were eligible to seek an alternative designation in the third round if they received a TCD for a low- VHF channel (channels 2- 6) or if their TCD was subject to international coordination issues which the Commission has been unable to resolve with the Canadian and Mexican governments. Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18306, ¶ 63. 26 In the third round, we received seven channel elections from stations that did not have a TCD, 14 from stations that had a low- VHF TCD, and one from a station that had an international coordination issue. 27 Public Notice, “Third Round of the DTV Channel Election Process: Tentative Channel Designations,” DA 06-1675 (MB rel. Aug. 29, 2006) (“ Third Round TCD PN”). The four eligible stations without TCDs after the third round were: WABC- TV (New York, New York), WEDH- TV (Hartford, Connecticut), KTFK( TV) (Stockton, California), and KVIE( TV) (Sacramento, California). In the Third Round TCD PN, the Media Bureau said that the Commission would resolve these situations in a subsequent proceeding. Id. at 2. We do so here in Section III. B., infra, and include these final TCDs in our proposed new DTV Table. 28 Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18291, ¶ 31. 6 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 7 protecting existing service and respecting investments already made, to the extent feasible. Finally, we believe the proposed new DTV Table reflects our efforts to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure the best possible DTV service to the public. 15. The channel assignments in the proposed DTV Table are primarily based on the TCDs previously announced through the channel election process; 29 however, in order to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure the best possible DTV service to the public, in some cases Commission staff found it necessary to assign a different channel for post- transition operation in order to minimize interference and maximize the efficiency of broadcast allotments in the public interest. 30 16. We invite comment on our proposed new DTV Table. 31 We seek comment on whether the channel assignments in the proposed DTV Table will serve the Commission’s goals of promoting overall spectrum efficiency and ensuring the best possible DTV service to the public. We ask that licensees review the accuracy of their information contained in the proposed DTV Table and Appendix B, including whether it properly reflects any conflict- resolving amendments to their certifications, and comment on any inaccuracies or discrepancies. The proposed DTV Table will ultimately replace the existing DTV and NTSC Tables after the transition. 32 We request comment on how best to time the adoption and effective date of the proposed DTV Table so that it is available for stations’ reference and reliance in applying for construction permits or modifications needed to implement their post- transition facilities. We do not seek comment here on issues related to the DTV transition other than the channel assignments in the proposed DTV Table, as such issues will be addressed in a later proceeding. A. Allotment Methodology and Evaluation of Interference Conflicts 17. In the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, the Commission stated that the staff would evaluate channel elections after each channel election round in order to identify potential interference conflicts. Interference conflicts were found to exist only where licensees 29 We estimate that more than 98 percent of licensees participating in the channel election process received a TCD for the channel they elected. Approximately 10 licensees requested that the Commission identify a “best available” channel for them. In addition, approximately 30 licensees did not file a channel election form when required. Each of these licensees was given a TCD either (1) on its in- core DTV channel, if it had one, or (2) on its in- core NTSC channel if it did not have an in- core DTV channel, and the NTSC channel did not cause impermissible interference to another station. The remaining stations generally were provided channels that would allow them to serve the full population the station would reach with its certified facilities. In several cases, however, it was necessary to provide stations with channels and facilities that would enable service to a population less than that which could be reached with their certified facilities. In those cases, stations were provided with facilities that would at least enable replication of their service coverage as set forth in the initial DTV Table. Such stations (upon demonstration that they cannot construct their full, authorized DTV facilities because doing so would cause impermissible interference) may file requests for alternative channel assignments, as discussed below in Section III. B., supra ¶ 22. 30 Id. at 18288, ¶ 23. 31 See infra, Appendix A: Proposed Rule Changes (proposed revision to 47 C. F. R. § 73. 622); see also Appendix B: Proposed DTV Table of Allotments Information (proposed allotment for each station, including information about each station’s technical facilities and predicted service and interference information). 32 47 C. F. R. §§ 73. 606( b) and 73. 622( b). See supra note 6. 7 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 8 elected channels other than their current DTV channel, most often for stations that elected their NTSC channels. 33 18. In developing the proposed DTV Table and Appendix B (which sets forth the channel assignment, operating facilities, and service information for individual stations), the staff used objective computer analysis to perform the engineering evaluations for determining station service coverage and interference. In performing these evaluations, the staff relied on the technical standards and methods set forth in Sections 73.622( e) and 73.623( c) of our rules, which (1) define the geographic service area of DTV stations, and (2) provide minimum interference technical criteria for modification of DTV allotments included in the initial DTV Table. 34 Specifically, Section 73.622( e) defines a DTV station’s service area as the geographic area within the station’s noise- limited F( 50,90) contour where its signal is predicted to exceed the noise- limited service level. 35 A station’s noise- limited contour is computed using its actual transmitter location, ERP, antenna HAAT, and antenna radiation pattern. Section 73.623( c) sets forth the thresholds of desired- to- undesired (D/ U) ratio at which interference is considered to occur. 19. Consistent with Sections 73.622( e) and 73.623( c), the staff used the procedure set forth in Office of Engineering and Technology’s OET Bulletin No. 69 to make predictions of service coverage and interference. 36 This procedure uses the terrain- dependent Longley- Rice point- to- point propagation model for predicting the geographic areas and populations served by stations. Under the procedure in OET Bulletin No. 69, the predicted geographic area and population served by a TV station are reduced by any interference it receives from other stations. In these evaluations, the staff examined interference resulting from co- channel and first adjacent channel relationships in accordance with the interference criteria for DTV allotments specified in Section 73.623( c). The computer software used in this work is similar to that used in performing the service coverage and interference evaluations for the initial DTV Table and that the Media Bureau has used to evaluate requests for modification of DTV facilities and changes in channel allotments in the initial DTV Table. This software provides analysis of service coverage and interference on both a cumulative and individual- station basis. 20. As indicated above, the staff used a database composed of TV station authorizations to which licensees certified as of November 5, 2004 (the “certification database”), 37 including both analog and digital stations, in processing channel elections. This database was used to determine and evaluate existing DTV service populations, the benchmark 33 It was not necessary to determine the amount of interference caused by stations that elected their current DTV channel because operation on those channels would not result in new interference. 34 See 47 C. F. R. §§ 73. 622( e), 73. 623( c). 35 47 C. F. R. § 73. 622( e). The F( 50, 90) designator indicates that a specified field strength necessary for the provision of DTV service is expected to be available at 50 percent of the locations 90 percent of the time. Id. 36 See OET Bulletin No. 69, “Longley- Rice Methodology for Evaluating TV Coverage and Interference,” (Feb. 6, 2004) (“ OET Bulletin No. 69”), available at www. fcc. gov/ Bureaus/ Engineering_ Technology/ Documents/ bulletins/ oet69/ oet69. pdf. 37 The certification database was made available in tables attached to the Public Notice, “DTV Channel Election Information and First Round Election Filing Deadline,” 19 FCC Rcd 24141 (MB 2004). 8 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 9 amounts of existing interference, and the new interference that would result from specific channel elections. In deciding to rely on this database in the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, the Commission indicated that basing stations’ service evaluations on currently authorized facilities would more accurately reflect current service to viewers than the parameters specified for the initial DTV Table adopted in 1997, and amended in 1998, and would at the same time preserve the service areas of those stations that constructed and are operating in accordance with the DTV build- out schedules. 38 21. The Commission performed interference- conflict analyses in only two circumstances: (1) where a station elected a channel that was different from its current DTV channel, and (2) to identify a “best available” channel. 39 In doing so, the staff calculated values for the ERP and the directional antenna radiation pattern that would allow a station to match its coverage area based on its certified facilities or replication facilities, as appropriate. 40 New interference to post- transition DTV operations was defined as interference beyond that caused by existing analog and DTV operations, as set forth in the certification database information. 41 Evaluations of service coverage and interference conflicts were based only on the populations determined to be receiving service and new interference. 42 The staff used population data from the year 2000 census. In performing conflict analyses, the staff applied the standard that an interference conflict exists when it was predicted that more than 0.1 percent new interference would be caused to another station. That is, the standard was that new interference was considered to constitute a conflict when that new interference affected more than 0.1 percent of the population predicted to be served by the station in the absence of that new interference. 43 22. In the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, the Commission recognized that a special accommodation was necessary if a station with an out- of- core DTV channel elected to operate its post- transition DTV station on its in- core analog channel. 44 The Commission stated 38 See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18294, ¶ 37. 39 See ¶ 24, infra, for a discussion of the process by which “best available” channels were determined. 40 Calculations of new ERP and antenna patterns for stations’ elected channels were performed in the same manner as those performed by the Commission to match DTV facilities to analog facilities; see Sixth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 14693, app. B. 41 Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18294, ¶ 37. 42 Id. at 18294, ¶ 38. 43 Id. at 18302- 03, ¶ 56. 44 The Commission’s goal was to facilitate a station’s election of its in- core analog channel if the station did not have an in- core DTV channel. To this end, the Commission recognized that the interference relationships between DTV- to- DTV and NTSC- to- DTV operations are such that a DTV station serving the same geographic area as its associated analog station would have a 1 dB greater interference impact on a co- channel DTV station than it would have had as an analog station and an 8 dB greater impact on an adjacent channel DTV station than it would have had as an analog station, assuming the same coverage and locations for all stations. Thus, DTV operation on a station’s analog channel could result in new interference. Unlike a station that has its DTV channel inside the core, and therefore could avoid this new interference by electing its in- core DTV channel, a station with an out- of- core DTV channel by definition could not elect its DTV channel for post- transition use. A station that did not have an in- core analog channel could not make use of this special accommodation. Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18302- 03, ¶ 56. 9 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 10 that the 0.1 percent additional interference limit could be exceeded on a limited basis in order to afford these stations an improved opportunity to select their own NTSC channel. The Commission indicated that such allowance is justified because these licensees have only one in-core option available (i. e., their NTSC channel) and may need this additional accommodation to be able to operate on their in- core channel after the end of the transition. 45 In developing the proposed DTV Table, the staff allowed stations that were eligible to participate in the channel election process and that had either an out- of- core DTV channel or no DTV channel (i. e., a singleton with only an in- core analog channel) to select their in- core NTSC channel for post-transition DTV operation if it would cause no more than 2.0 percent new interference to a protected DTV station. Any such stations that certified to their maximized facilities, however, would be permitted to use the 2.0 percent standard only to the extent that the predicted new interference also would not exceed the amount of interference that would have been caused by replication facilities. 46 Where post- transition use of its NTSC channel by such a station was predicted to cause interference to a protected station in excess of 2.0 percent of the protected station’s population coverage, the electing station was then made subject to the normal conflict-resolution procedures. 47 23. Where a station in round one or round two elected and received a TCD for a DTV channel that was not its current NTSC or DTV channel, the interference potential of that new channel was included in the service coverage and interference evaluations of subsequent elections. That is, new channels elected and tentatively designated in round one under approved NCAs 48 were included in the service coverage and interference evaluations of channels elected in rounds two and three. Similarly, channels elected and tentatively designated in round two were included in the service coverage and interference evaluations in round three. 24. In cases where the licensee requested, or was given, a Commission- determined “best available” channel for its station, the staff used an ordered approach that balanced treatment of the station for which a channel was to be provided and other stations, as follows. The staff first analyzed the station’s possible post- transition operation on each in- core channel. On each channel, the staff examined the interference impact and service coverage based on the station’s certified facilities. If there was a channel or channels where the station could operate without causing new interference to another station and provide adequate service, the staff gave it a TCD on that channel. If there was more than one such channel, the staff generally chose the lowest channel that was outside of the low- VHF band. In cases where there was no channel that would allow the station to satisfy these criteria when operating at its certified maximized facilities, the staff re- examined the station’s possible post- transition operation on each in- core channel at its replication facilities. The staff then selected a channel for the station that would result in the minimum amount of new interference to protected stations. In these cases, the 45 Id. 46 See Public Notice, “DTV Channel Election: First Round Conflict Decision Extension and Guidelines For Interference Conflict Analysis,” 20 FCC Rcd 13415 (MB 2005); Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18301- 04, ¶ 53- 7 (describing conflict analysis). 47 Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18302- 03, ¶ 56. 48 Id. at 18297- 98, ¶ 45 (describing NCAs). 10 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 11 objective was to achieve a balance that would minimize the amount of interference that the subject station would cause to and receive from other stations. In every “best available” channel determination, the interference that other stations would receive from the TCD was less than 2.0 percent. B. Requests for Alternative Channel Assignments 25. At this stage in the DTV channel election process, we will consider requests for alternative channel assignments only from (1) licensees unable to construct full, authorized DTV facilities 49 on the TCDs that they requested and received because, in order to avoid causing impermissible interference to other TCDs and still obtain their preferred channel, they had to agree to construct facilities on their TCD that are smaller than those to which they had certified on FCC Form 381, 50 (2) licensees with international coordination issues which the Commission has been unable to resolve with the Canadian and Mexican governments, 51 (3) licensees with TCDs for low- VHF channels (channels 2- 6); and (4) new licensees and permittees that attained such status after the start of the channel election process and to which we assigned a TCD for post- transition DTV operations because their assigned NTSC or DTV channel was determined to cause impermissible interference to existing licensees. 52 Licensees that want to change their DTV allotment, but which are not in any of these categories (e. g., are technically able to construct their full, authorized DTV facilities on their existing TCD) may request a change in allotment only after the proposed DTV Table is finalized and must do so through the existing allotment procedures, as set forth in Section 1.420 of our rules. 53 Parties seeking alternative channel assignments consistent with this paragraph should file their requests in accordance with the filing procedures set forth in Section IV. D., infra. 26. In assessing proposed alternative channel assignments, we will also consider requests that include the consensual substitution of the TCD of another station that is not otherwise eligible to request an alternative channel assignment. We will consider such requests if it is demonstrated that the additional channel substitution is technically necessary to implement the eligible licensee’s requested alternative channel assignment. We will review requests involving a channel substitution to assure compliance with the public interest and will reject any such request if it would require acceptance of a significant level of interference by, or result in a loss of service to, one or both of the requesting stations. Licensees unable to construct their full, authorized DTV facilities may also submit a technical showing that a modification of the licensee’s pre- freeze authorized DTV facility – such as a change in transmitter site or an increase in power – would permit construction of their full, authorized DTV facilities with their present 49 The term “full, authorized DTV facilities” here refers to the original facilities certified by the licensee in its FCC Form 381. We will not preclude requests for alternative channel assignments from licensees that modified their certified facilities after receiving a conflict letter in the first and second channel election rounds. 50 We will consider only engineering demonstrations here. Requests based on financial or other reasons will not be considered. 51 See Section III. E., infra ¶¶ 41- 42. 52 See Section III. F., infra. 53 47 C. F. R. § 1.420. 11 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 12 TCD or a substitute channel. 54 We will continue to limit additional interference to DTV stations to 0.1 percent during this seventh and final stage of the DTV channel election process. Any request for an alternative channel assignment that causes excess interference must be accompanied by a request for a waiver of the 0.1 percent limit or the signed written consent of the affected licensee. We propose to grant waivers of the 0.1 percent limit where doing so would promote our overall spectrum efficiency objectives and ensure the best possible service to the public, including service to local communities. 55 27. At this time, we are continuing the freeze on requests for changing DTV channels within the DTV Table and on new DTV channels, as well as on the filing of modification applications by full- service television and Class A television stations. 56 From our past experience when we adopted the initial DTV Table, 57 we expect that we will receive alternative channel requests from a number of licensees, and that parties will file petitions for reconsideration of the Report and Order adopted in this proceeding. Thus, the importance of a stable database remains crucial until such time as the DTV Table is adopted and becomes final. However, we may grant waivers on a case- by- case basis in response to requests for alternative channel assignments. 58 We will determine when it is appropriate to lift the freeze in a future proceeding. C. Requests to Change Certified Facilities 28. By November 5, 2004, all DTV licensees were required to certify whether they would construct replication or maximization facilities. 59 Forty- one stations did not timely file the appropriate form (FCC Form 381) and, therefore, were assigned replication facilities (or authorized NTSC facilities if they were a single- channel NTSC- only station). 60 We will permit these licensees to file comments proposing a change to their certification to specify maximized facilities for which they would have been allowed to certify. We are also aware that there are cases where a station already has constructed or received authorization to construct facilities on its TCD that provide service to areas that extend beyond that to which the station certified using FCC Form 381. Because the interference protection that we provide is limited to the area to 54 Licensees requesting alternative channel assignments will be required to continue to protect the full, authorized DTV facilities of other licensees. 55 See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18307, ¶ 65. 56 See Section II, supra ¶ 6. 57 Sixth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 14590, ¶ 1. 58 It is well settled that the Commission has discretion to waive a rule where “particular facts would make strict compliance with the rule inconsistent with the public interest” and “special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule.” See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F. 2d 1164, 1166 (D. C. Cir. 1990) (citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F. 2d 1153, 1159 (D. C. Cir. 1969). 59 See supra note 18. 60 Of these stations, nine requested that we waive the freeze and filing deadlines to accept their untimely maximization certifications. Requests were filed on behalf of stations KFNB( TV), Caspar, Wyoming; KLWY( TV), Cheyenne, Wyoming; WCJB- TV, Gainesville, Florida; KOAA( TV), Pueblo, Colorado; KSCE( TV), El Paso, Texas; KOCE- TV, Huntington Beach, California; WLMB( TV), Toledo, Ohio; WGGN- TV, Sandusky, Ohio; and WLLA( TV), Kalamazoo, Michigan. 12 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 13 which a station has certified, there is a possibility that stations serving or authorized to serve areas beyond their certified area could become subject to interference. If a licensee can demonstrate that the area served by its authorized or constructed facilities extends beyond the area to which it certified, it may file comments proposing to modify its certified facilities to match its authorized or constructed facilities. 29. Licensees requesting a modification of their certifications must either (1) submit an engineering analysis demonstrating that their proposed certified facilities would not result in interference in excess of 0.1 percent to any licensee’s existing TCD or (2) submit the signed, written consent of every affected licensee. They will also be required to accept interference from any channel election already approved. D. Resolution of TCDs Pending After Round Three 30. Our proposed DTV Table includes four proposed allotments that were unresolved when we announced TCDs for the third round. 61 These channel designations represent challenging and difficult cases in crowded markets that necessitate waiver of the freeze or the interference standard in order to find appropriate channels for post- transition operation that will ensure the best possible service to the public and promote overall spectrum efficiency. 62 We invite comment on these proposed channel allotments. 31. New York, New York. In the first round of the channel election process, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (“ ABC”), the licensee of WABC- TV, channel 7, and permittee of WABC- DT, channel 45, New York, New York, 63 elected to use its analog channel 7 for digital operation at the end of the DTV transition. The Media Bureau sent ABC a first- round conflict letter because the elected NTSC channel was predicted to cause 2.8 percent new interference to the elected DTV channel of NCE station WNJB- DT, channel *8, New Brunswick, New Jersey. ABC was unable to resolve its conflict with The New Jersey Public Broadcasting Authority (“ NJPBA”), the permittee of WNJB- DT, within the allotted timeframe. On August 15, 2005, ABC filed a request for a waiver of the 0.1 percent interference standard used to calculate first round interference conflicts in order to permit WABC to operate digitally on its current analog allotment at the end of the DTV transition. 64 32. In its emergency petition for waiver, ABC contends that the 2.8 percent new interference it is predicted to cause to WNJB is based on WNJB’s maximized authorized facilities, which it has yet to build. 65 ABC also argues that the viewers who would potentially be 61 See Third Round TCD PN, DA 06- 1675 at 2. 62 See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18308, ¶ 65. See also Section III. B., supra, ¶ 24 (discussing waivers of the freeze); Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18309, ¶ 69 (considering freeze waivers when necessary or in the public interest for technical or other reasons). 63 WABC is the flagship station of the ABC Television Network and is the sole ABC network station serving the New York market. ABC was an early adopter of DTV technology, commencing operation with its full, authorized DTV facility at the World Trade Center in 2001. File No. BLCDT- 20010710ABU. 64 See WABC- TV ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 (dated Aug. 15, 2005) (“ ABC Emergency Request for Waiver”). Simultaneous with its waiver request, ABC filed FCC Form 383 (First Round Conflict Decision Channel Election) certifying that ABC changed its election to channel 45, subject to the outcome of this waiver proceeding. 65 Id. at 14- 15. 13 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 14 affected by this predicted new interference are either (1) outside the state of New Jersey, or (2) within the state but served by WNJB’s sister station, WNJN, Montclair, New Jersey, which currently provides the same programming as WNJB. 66 In addition, ABC asserts that enforcement of the 0.1 percent new interference standard in this instance would impose an undue hardship on WABC by preventing it from replicating its current analog service area, thus resulting in a loss of over- the- air service to current WABC viewers. 67 Further, ABC claims that post- transition operation on its digital channel 45 would result in losses of service due to interference from WOLF, Hazleton, Pennsylvania, and WEDH, Hartford, Connecticut. 68 33. WPIX, Inc., another VHF broadcaster in the New York market, joined in the waiver request in support of ABC. Educational Broadcasting Corporation, licensee of NCE station WNET, licensed to Newark, New Jersey, also filed in support of ABC’s waiver request. 69 NJPBA opposed ABC’s request and contends that WABC’s service on its digital channel 45 would not result in any loss of service area. 70 ABC offered to pay for WNJB to install a directional antenna to eliminate the most of the interference. 71 NJPBA rejected ABC’s engineering offer and proposed instead that WNJB relocate its digital transmission facility to the Empire State Building in New York City at no expense. 72 The Media Bureau deferred action on ABC’s first round channel election until the conclusion of the channel election process. 73 34. Subsequently, NJPBA indicated that it would be willing to co- locate its transmitting facilities at Four Times Square in New York City as a possible resolution to this issue. 74 In response, ABC agreed not to object to WNJB- DT’s move to Four Times Square provided there was favorable action on its election of channel 7 and related waiver request. 75 Both parties recognized, however, that the current Commission freeze on major modification applications would prevent this resolution. Ultimately, NJPBA stated that if the freeze is waived so that WNJB- DT can apply to modify its facilities to co- locate at Four Times Square, then it 66 Id. at 9- 11. WNJB is a satellite station of WNJT, Trenton. See BEDSTA - 20060628ABA, Ex 36 (Explaining that WNJB is not subject to the July 1, 2006 use or lose deadline because of its status as a satellite station). WNJB is also a satellite of WNJN, Little Falls, New Jersey. See Nielsen Station Index, Directory of TV Stations, 2005- 2006, at 50. 67 Id. at 11- 14. 68 Id. at 18- 19. 69 See Educational Broadcasting Corporation (“ EBC”) ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 (dated May 22, 2006); and EBC ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 (dated Sept. 1, 2005) (“ Comments in Support of Emergency Request for Waiver”). 70 See NJPBA ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 (dated Sept. 12, 2005) (“ Comments in Opposition to Emergency Request for Waiver”). 71 ABC Emergency Request for Waiver at 15- 16. 72 Id. at Ex 10. 73 See First Round TCD PN, 20 FCC Rcd at 15737; Second Round TCD PN, DA 06- 991 at 4- 5; Third Round TCD PN, DA 06- 1675 at 2. 74 See NJPBA ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 (dated Sept. 1, 2005) at 17. 75 See WABC- TV ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 (dated May 12, 2006). 14 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 15 would no longer object to WABC operating on channel 7. 76 NJPBA also has asserted that the proposed co- location of WNJB- DT and WABC- DT in New York would have the additional benefit of reducing the amount of interference received by WABC- DT on channel 7 from WNJB- DT’s currently authorized operations in New Jersey. 77 This potential agreement remains pending between the parties. 35. According to ABC, WABC- DT will provide a DTV service area with a population of 19,324,895 operating on channel 7, approximately 300,000 more people than would receive such service on channel 45. 78 ABC also contends that channel 7 is more capable of replicating WABC’s pre- September 11, 2001 service area than channel 45. In addition, ABC states that WABC’s operation on digital channel 45 would be subject to co- channel interference from operations on channel 45 in Pennsylvania and Connecticut, which would affect nearly half a million people. 79 36. We conclude that the loss of service for WABC would affect current viewers of WABC, while the predicted loss of service for WNJB would affect areas outside of its current service area and primarily outside of the state of New Jersey. 80 We note, too, that WABC is a pioneer of digital service, 81 having built full- power digital operations in 2001 82 and re- built them first at Four Times Square and then on the Empire State Building, with a back- up facility at Alpine Tower in New Jersey, after the September 11, 2001 loss of the World Trade Center. 83 In contrast, WNJB has not built its digital facility and recently requested an extension of its STA beyond the July 1, 2006 “use- or- lose” deadline based on its status as a satellite station. 84 Based on all the factors in the record, we believe that the public interest and the factors enumerated in the Second DTV Periodic 85 favor granting WABC a TCD on channel 7 notwithstanding the predicted 2.8 percent interference to WNJB on channel 8. We find that WABC’s continued transmission on channel 7 will benefit WABC’s viewers, many of whom have relied on VHF 76 See NJPBA ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 (dated June 2, 2006). 77 Id. at 2- 3. 78 See WABC- TV ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 (dated Oct. 7, 2005) at 7- 8 (“ Reply to Opposition”). 79 ABC predicts that its operation on channel 45 would result in a loss of service to nearly 500, 000 people. Id. at 8- 9. ABC notes that television receivers are less tolerant of the co- channel interference among stations on channel 45 than of the adjacent channel interference potentially arising between WABC on channel 7 and WNJB on channel 8. 80 ABC also points out that WABC’s move to UHF channel 45 would leave WPIX and WNET as the only New York City stations on VHF channels (channel 11 and 13, respectively), which could undermine a plan for digital VHF service in the New York market. ABC also argues that UHF channels provide inferior service to indoor antennas in urban areas in which buildings impede reception. ABC Emergency Request for Waiver at 20- 21. 81 In the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, the Commission indicated that it would consider a number of factors, including “whether the station was an early adopter of DTV technology,” when deciding among third round election preferences. See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18306, ¶ 64. 82 See File No. BLCDT- 20010710ABU. 83 See File Nos. BDSTA- 20031024AAW, BXSTA- 20040728APD, and BMDSTA- 20040419ACL 84 See BEDSTA - 20060628ABA. 85 See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18306, ¶ 64. 15 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 16 antennas for decades. Allotting channel 7 to WABC provides the additional benefit of eliminating concerns about potential interference between WABC and WEDH- TV, a NCE station in Hartford, Connecticut, 86 and WOLF in Pennsylvania. Accordingly, we grant ABC’s request for waiver of the 0.1 percent interference standard. We also note that NJPBA may apply in the future to modify WNJB- DT’s facilities to move to Four Times Square for post- transition service. If that application is granted, WNJB’s virtual collocation with WABC- DT and other New York market stations would be likely to reduce or eliminate the predicted interference to its digital operations on channel 8. 87 37. Hartford and Norwich, Connecticut. Connecticut Public Broadcasting, Inc. (“ CPBI”) is the licensee of NCE stations WEDH- TV, channel *24, Hartford, Connecticut and WEDN, channel *53, Norwich, Connecticut. In the existing DTV Table, WEDH was assigned digital channel *32 and WEDN was assigned digital channel *45. 88 In 1999, CPBI filed an application to swap the digital channels between these two stations. 89 This swap application has remained in a pending status. In 2004, CPBI filed a petition for rulemaking to substitute channel *9 as WEDN’s digital channel, and the Media Bureau issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing the channel substitution. 90 38. The Second DTV Periodic Report and Order stated that, during the channel election process, we would protect channels proposed in outstanding rule makings where a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking had been issued, and that we would permit licensees to elect a channel if an NPRM had been issued with respect to a channel change. 91 The Second DTV Periodic Report and Order did not specifically address how DTV channels in a pending swap application would be treated. 39. In the first round of the channel election, WEDH- TV elected channel *45 in reliance on the pending 1999 channel swap application, 92 and WEDN elected channel *9 based on the related pending channel substitution rulemaking. Because these elections are based on matters that were pending before the commencement of the channel election process, the 2.0 percent standard set forth in Section 73.623( c)( 2) applies. 93 Our engineering study confirms that 86 As discussed below in ¶¶ 34- 37, we propose to allot channel *45 to WEDH- TV, which elected that channel based on its pending swap application. 87 See NJPBA ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 (dated June 2, 2006). 88 See 47 C. F. R. § 73. 622( b). 89 See File No. BPEDT- 19990113KG (swap application). 90 See File No. BFREET- 20050209AMZ. See Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 8603 (2004) (“ Norwich NPRM”). 91 See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18307- 08, ¶ 67 and 18279 (Channel election form 382 provides: “Pending Channel Change Requests. Licensees for which the Commission has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking with respect to a channel change request may elect the new channel proposed in the NPRM.”) 92 See File No. BFREET- 20050209ACP (WEDH first round election). We note that WEDH certified on FCC Form 381 that it would construct the channel *45 facilities proposed in this swap application. File No. BCERET-20041102AED (WEDH certification). 93 47 C. F. R. § 73.623( c)( 2). 16 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 17 the channels elected by CPBI for its Hartford and Norwich stations comply with the 2.0 percent technical standard. 94 WEDN received a TCD for channel *9, but WEDH did not get a TCD for channel *45 due to the unresolved status of stations’ channel elections in an adjacent market. 95 40. We believe the public interest would be served by allotting DTV channel *45 to Hartford as well as channel *9 to Norwich, which was tentatively designated after round one. According to CPBI, doing so will enable station WEDH- DT to increase service to an additional 1,275,810 people while reducing its operating costs and, similarly, enable WEDN to increase DTV service to an additional 1,029,678 people while reducing its operating costs. 96 We also note that our proposal facilitates a successful resolution of the channel election process in a highly congested area of the country. 97 In particular, replacing WEDH’s allotted DTV channel *32 with channel *45 eliminates potential interference from channel 33, which WCBS (New York) elected in round two. WCBS was predicted to cause 0.5 percent interference to WEDH (20,311 people) if it remained on channel 32. 98 WCBS agreed to reduce its facilities to comply with the 0.1 percent standard, thus reducing service significantly. 99 As a result of approving WEDH’s TCD for channel *45, WCBS would no longer be required to reduce its facilities in this respect. Therefore, we have adjusted the proposed parameters for WCBS in Appendix B to describe their certified facility, rather than the reduced facility they had submitted to resolve the conflict with WEDH’s operation on channel 32. 100 Moreover, since the communities of Hartford and Norwich are located within 400 kilometers of the U. S.- Canadian border, concurrence by the Canadian government was sought and has been obtained for the allotments on channels *45 and *9, respectively. 101 Accordingly, we propose to allot channel *45 to Hartford and channel *9 to 94 Neither WEDH’s digital facilities on channel *45 nor WEDN’s digital operations on channel *9 would cause more than 2.0 percent interference to adjacent or co- channel stations. 95 See First Round TCD PN, 20 FCC Rcd at 15737 (noting that WEDH and WEDN’s application to swap DTV channels remained pending). WABC- TV in New York had elected its allotted digital channel 45 but contended that WEDH’s operation on channel 45 at Hartford would result in a loss of WABC- DT service to approximately 300, 000 viewers. WABC- TV preferred to elect its NTSC channel 7, as described, supra. See also WABC- TV ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 (dated Aug. 15, 2005) (“ Emergency Request for Waiver” of the 0.1 percent interference standard). In light of the pending inter- related issues concerning channel 45 in this congested area, we declined to approve TCDs for WABC or WEDH. 96 CPBI ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 (dated May 25, 2006). 97 For example, WABC- DT’s contention that CPBI’s proposed operation on channel 45 at Hartford would result in an increase in interference for approximately 300,000 viewers was factored into our conclusion, above, that the public interest would be served by allotting channel 7, rather than channel 45, as WABC- DT’s post- transition digital channel. 98 See File No. BSRECT- 20051028AAE (rev’d Mar. 7, 2006). 99 See File No. BSRCCT- 20060403BQX (WCBS Conflict Resolution Form 385). 100 In submitting its engineering to resolve the interference conflict in the second round, WCBS had also indicated its intention to withdraw the reduced facility in the event that WEDH would not be operating post- transition on channel 32. See id. 101 The Commission permitted licensees subject to international coordination to certify to operate their post-transition DTV channel pursuant to a pending DTV application for maximized facilities that had not yet been authorized because of a pending international coordination issue. See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18383, app. E. 17 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 18 Norwich, and these allotments are included in our proposed DTV Table. Both the application and rulemaking proceedings associated with the changes CPBI requested for its Hartford and Norwich stations are superseded by our actions herein, and parties that previously objected to the use of channels *45 and *9, as proposed in the swap application and channel substitution NPRM, may file comments in response to our proposal here. 41. Stockton, California. Telefutura Sacramento, LLC is the licensee of station KTFK( TV), NTSC channel 64 and KTFK- DT, DTV channel 62, Stockton, California. In the second round, Telefutura elected channel 26 as part of a NCA with other licensees in the region. The NCA was approved only in part, with Telefutura’s election being rejected for violating the freeze. 102 In the third round, Telefutura again elected channel 26 and proposed to move its transmitter site from Mount Diablo to the Walnut Grove antenna farm, which is closer to its community of license. This channel is acceptable under the 0.1 percent criterion that is applied in evaluating DTV channel elections in this proceeding. But in order to do so, Telefutura must modify its station’s facilities to change its station’s geographic coverage area, which would violate the freeze imposed in connection with the DTV channel election process. 103 42. Mount Diablo is located near the border between the San Francisco and Sacramento- Stockton- Modesto Designated Market Areas (DMAs), and KTFK and the other station on Mt. Diablo were required to elect channels which would not cause interference to stations in either market. Telefutura has submitted a comprehensive engineering analysis showing that, with the exception of low- VHF channels, only channel 14 is suitable for use on Mt. Diablo, and channel 14 was elected by the other Mt. Diablo licensee, pursuant to a NCA with Telefutura and other licensees in the region. 104 43. The proposed move to the Walnut Grove antenna farm will permit Telefutura to co- locate KTFK with the other stations in the Sacramento- Stockton- Modesto DMA. According to Telefutura, this move will provide new Telefutura network service to more than 440, 000 viewers in KTFK’s DMA. 105 While viewers in the San Francisco DMA will lose KTFK service due to terrain blockage, these viewers receive the same network programming from KTFK’s “sister” station, KFSF, Vallejo, California. In addition, the entire loss area is served by numerous other NTSC and DTV stations. Based on the record before us, and in order to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure the best possible DTV service to the public, we believe that the public interest would be served by waiving the freeze to permit modification of KTFK’s certified facilities. We believe our proposal facilitates a successful resolution of the channel election process in a highly congested area. Further, our proposal improves service to KTFK’s community of license and the local area. In addition, our proposal will facilitate adoption of the final DTV Table and avoid the allotment of a low- VHF channel, which the Commission has long 102 See Second Round TCD PN, DA 06- 991 at 2. 103 August 2004 Filing Freeze PN, 19 FCC Rcd at 14810- 11. 104 See Second Round TCD PN, DA 06- 991 at 2- 3. 105 See File No. BTRECT- 20060526AHK (KTFK’s FCC Form 386), “Statement of Support of Third Round DTV Channel Election,” MB Docket No. 03- 15, at 9 (filed May 30, 2006). 18 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 19 disfavored. 106 Accordingly, we propose to allot channel 26 to Stockton as specified in our proposed DTV Table. 107 44. Sacramento, California. KVIE, Inc. is the licensee of NCE television station KVIE( TV), Sacramento, California. KVIE currently operates on NTSC channel *6 and was assigned out- of- core DTV channel *53. As a licensee with only one in- core channel, KVIE elected to release channel *6 and participate in the second round of elections. 108 In that round, KVIE elected channel *9 as part of a NCA with five other licensees in the Bay Area, but elected channel *6 in response to the conflict letter it received. 109 As a licensee with a low- VHF TCD, KVIE was permitted to seek an alternative TCD in the third round, 110 and did so by again electing (via FCC Form 386) channel *9. 111 45. In its application, KVIE acknowledges that its proposal is predicted to cause 1.3 percent new interference to the TCD of DTV channel *9 for NCE station KIXE- TV, Redding, California. KVIE argues, however, that use of channel 6 would provide inferior service to its viewers, and that the public interest would be better served by Commission approval of KVIE’s third round channel selection. 112 The Northern California Educational Television Association filed comments opposing KVIE’s request, arguing that KVIE does not provide any evidence that channel 6 is inferior to channel 9, and that it is KVIE’s responsibility to protect FM radio stations from interference. 113 In the Third Round TCD PN, the Media Bureau said this case would be addressed in a subsequent proceeding. 114 46. As noted above, the Commission has long disfavored the use of channel 6 as a DTV allotment. 115 When it adopted the initial DTV Table, the Commission sought to minimize the potential for interference between DTV and FM radio service by avoiding the use of channel 106 The Commission has recognized in this proceeding that low- VHF channels are subject to technical penalties, including higher ambient noise levels and, in the case of channel 6, concerns of possible interference to and from FM radio service. See Sixth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 14627, ¶ 82; see also DTV Sixth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 7436, ¶ 41. 107 Because we propose here to give Telefutura its desired TCD for channel 26, we dismiss as moot Telefutura’s application for review of the denial of its second round channel election. 108 See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18297, ¶ 44 (permitting licensees with only one in-core channel to release their in- core channel and choose to be treated like a licensee with two out- of- core channels). 109 See Second Round TCD PN, DA 06- 991 at 2. 110 See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18306, ¶ 63 (permitting licensees with low- VHF TCDs to seek an alternative TCD in the third round); see also, supra, note 25. 111 File No. BTREET- 20060526AKN (KVIE’s FCC Form 386). 112 KVIE argues that requiring it to operate on channel 6 post- transition “would frustrate the public interest because the use of a low- VHF band channel would not only prevent KVIE from providing the best possible digital service, but would also create a preclusive effect on NCE FM station operations in the area.” Id. at Exhibit 1, p. 2. 113 See Northern California Educational Television Association ex parte in MB Docket No. 03- 15 at 3- 4 (dated June 9, 2006). 114 See Third Round TCD PN, DA 06- 1675at 2. 115 See ¶ 38, supra. 19 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 20 6 for DTV whenever possible, which resulted in only one channel 6 allotment in the initial DTV Table. 116 47. We conclude that the public interest would be served by waiving the 0.1 percent interference standard with respect to KIXE. Based on staff engineering analysis, we believe that, at most, 4,921 people within the KIXE contour (out of a total population of 375,342) would receive interference from KVIE’s operation on DTV channel 9. Conversely, more than 4 million people residing within the KVIE service area will receive a superior DTV signal from KVIE on channel 9. Accordingly, we propose to allot channel *9 to Sacramento for post- transition DTV operations in our proposed DTV Table. 117 E. International Coordination 48. Border Coordination. Creating a new DTV Table has been a continuing cooperative North American effort, involving complex matters that require careful study and planning by parties on both sides of the negotiation. Under international arrangements with Canada and Mexico, 118 the Commission must obtain concurrence by the Canadian government for any proposed allotments located within 400 kilometers of the U. S.- Canadian border, and by the Mexican government for any proposed allotments located within 275 kilometers of the U. S. -Mexican border. Our international negotiations are continuing in a cooperative manner and we do not believe these negotiations will delay stations’ ability to construct their post- transition DTV facilities. 49. We announce here that Industry Canada has objected to the allotment of the TCDs for WBSF- DT, Bay City, Michigan and KAYU- DT, Spokane, Washington. Accordingly, while we include their TCD channels in our proposed DTV Table, we seek comment from these licensees concerning whether they are willing to reduce coverage on their TCD channel in order to address Canadian concerns. As indicated above, they may also request an alternative post-transition DTV channel allotment. F. Treatment of New Licensees and Permittees and Pending Applications for New Stations 50. In the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, the Commission stated that only Commission licensees and permittees were entitled to participate in the channel election process; applicants for new stations and petitioners for new allotments would not be allowed to make channel elections. 119 The Commission noted that there were applications for approximately 50 116 See DTV Sixth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 7437, ¶ 45. 117 KIXE elected its NTSC channel *9 as its TCD in the first round. KIXE may, if it wishes, file comments proposing to substitute its allotted DTV channel *18, or another channel, for its present TCD. 118 See “Letter of Understanding Between the Federal Communications Commission of the United States of America and Industry Canada Related to the Use of the 54- 72 MHz, 76- 88 MHz, 174- 216 MHz and 470- 806 MHz Bands for the Digital Television Broadcasting Service Along the Common Border,” signed September 22, 2000 and amended October 7, 2004, and “Memorandum of Understanding Between the Federal Communications Commission of the United States of America and the Secretaria de Comunicaciones y Transportes of the United Mexican States Related to the Use of the 54- 72 MHz, 76- 88 MHz, 174- 216 MHz and 470- 806 MHz Bands for the Digital Television Broadcasting Service Along the Common Border,” signed April 2, 1997. 119 Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18307, ¶ 66. 20 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 21 new NTSC stations that were pending since before 1997. Several of these applications have since been granted after the start of the channel election process, resulting in new licensees and permittees that were not eligible to take part in the channel election process. 120 Accordingly, at this time, we will accommodate these new licensees and permittees with TCDs in our proposed DTV Table. 51. For some of these new licensees and permittees, we have determined that their NTSC or DTV channel is appropriate for post- transition DTV operations. 121 Thus, we have tentatively designated their current channel for post- transition DTV operations in our proposed DTV Table. 52. For others of these new licensees and permittees, we have determined that their NTSC or DTV channel is not appropriate for post- transition DTV operations because it would cause impermissible interference to a protected TCD. 122 Thus, we have tentatively designated a “best available” channel for their post- transition DTV operations in our proposed DTV Table. We will allow these stations to request alternative channel assignments through the procedure discussed above in Section III. B., supra. These stations may wish to propose an alternative channel that could be used both during the transition as well as post- transition. 53. We note that additional pending applications may be granted before an Order finalizing the DTV Table is adopted. 123 To the extent possible, we will accommodate these future new permittees in our proposed DTV Table, consistent with the approach described above for existing new permittees. 124 In order to provide interested parties with the opportunity to comment, the Media Bureau will issue public notices, to be published in the Federal Register, announcing TCDs for the new permittees that attain permittee status during the pendency of this rulemaking proceeding. If necessary, the Media Bureau is directed to establish a separate pleading cycle so that interested parties are given sufficient time to comment. Comments filed in response to such public notices will be incorporated into the record in this proceeding. 120 Two of these permittees filed channel elections in round three; seven others, similarly situated, did not. In the Third Round TCD PN, we did not announce TCDs for these stations because they were authorized after the completion of the first round and, therefore, were not eligible to participate in the channel election process. Third Round TCD PN, DA 06- 1675 at 1 n. 3. 121 This group consists of: (1) WMBF- TV, channel 32, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; (2) KWKS, channel 19, Colby, Kansas; and (3) BPCT- 960920KY, channel 47, Presque Isle, Maine. 122 This group consists of: (1) WHRE, channel 21, Virginia Beach, Virginia; (2) KNIC- TV, channel 17, Blanco, Texas; (3) BPCDT- 960920WX, channel 18, Mobile, Alabama; and (4) BPCT- 960920WR, channel 29, Gainesville, Florida. DTV operation of the Virginia Beach, Virginia NTSC license on channel 21 (WHRE) would cause 28. 9 percent new interference to the channel 20 TCD of WUND- TV, Edenton, North Carolina. DTV operation of the Blanco, Texas NTSC CP on channel 17 (KNIC- TV) would cause 0.8 percent new interference to the channel 16 TCD of KHCE- TV, San Antonio, Texas. DTV operation of the Mobile, Alabama DTV CP on channel 18 (BPCDT-960920WX) would cause 0.4 percent new interference to the channel 18 TCD of WMAU- TV, Bude, Mississippi. DTV operation of the Gainesville, Florida, NTSC CP on channel 29, (BPCT- 960920WR) would cause 0. 6 percent new interference to the channel 29 TCD of WFTS- TV, Tampa, Florida. 123 See, e. g., Public Notice, “FCC Announces It Is Prepared To Grant Television Construction Permits After Final Payments Are Made, Auction No. 64, DA 06- 1416 (rel. July 11, 2006). 124 See ¶¶ 51- 52. 21 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 22 54. Applicants that receive a construction permit after the close of the comment period in this proceeding may either construct their analog facilities or apply to the Commission for permission to construct a digital facility on their analog channel. Such digital facilities are for operation during the transition. Such permittees may request authorization to continue their DTV operations on their NTSC channels after the transition. We anticipate that, in most instances, the same channel that was allotted in the NTSC Table will be allotted in the DTV Table. 125 In the event that the NTSC channel is not suitable for DTV operations, such as if it would cause new interference in excess of 0.1 percent to another DTV station’s operations on its allotted channel, we will determine a “best available” channel. Before the end of the transition, we will issue a NPRM to amend the DTV Table in order to allot a DTV channel for each remaining authorized facility that does not have an allotted DTV channel. 125 See Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18299, ¶ 48. 22 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 23 IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis 55. The Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is attached to this Notice as Appendix C. B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis 56. This Notice has been analyzed with respect to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (“ PRA”), 126 and does not contain proposed information collection requirements. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified “information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,” pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002. 127 C. Ex Parte Rules 57. Permit- But- Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a “permit- but- disclose” proceeding subject to the “permit- but- disclose” requirements under section 1.1206( b) of the Commission’s rules. 128 Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. 129 Additional rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206( b). D. Filing Requirements 58. Comments and Replies. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission’s rules, 130 interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System (“ ECFS”), (2) the Federal Government’s eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. 131 59. Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: http:// www. fcc. gov/ cgb/ ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www. regulations. gov. Filers should follow the instructions provided on the website for submitting comments. For ECFS filers, if multiple docket or rulemaking numbers appear in the 126 The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (“ PRA”), Pub. L. No. 104- 13, 109 Stat 163 (1995) (codified in Chapter 35 of title 44 U. S. C.). 127 The Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002 (“ SBPRA”), Pub. L. No. 107- 198, 116 Stat 729 (2002) (codified in Chapter 35 of title 44 U. S. C.); see 44 U. S. C. 3506( c)( 4). 128 See 47 C. F. R. § 1.1206( b); see also 47 C. F. R. §§ 1. 1202, 1. 1203. 129 See id. § 1.1206( b)( 2). 130 See id. §§ 1. 415, 1419. 131 See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 23 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 25 V. ORDERING CLAUSES 64. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 1, 4( i) and (j), 7, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 316, 319, 324, 336, and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U. S. C §§ 151, 154( i) and (j), 157, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 316, 319, 324, 336, and 337 that NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the proposals and tentative conclusions described in this Seventh Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the proposed DTV Table of Allotment and amendments to Part 73 of the Commission’s rules, as set forth in Appendix A. 65. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Reference Information Center, Consumer Information Bureau, shall send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary 25 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 51 APPENDIX B PROPOSED DTV TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS INFORMATION The table in this appendix presents the Commission’s proposals for assigning the DTV channel allotments to individual broadcast television stations for post- transition DTV operations. It sets forth the proposed technical facilities – effective radiated power, antenna height above average terrain, and antenna identification code – and transmitter site for which each TV station would be authorized on its post- transition channel. The table also provides information on stations’ predicted service coverage and the percentage of their service population that would be affected by interference received from other DTV stations. The channels proposed for assignment to stations here are the same as those the Commission is proposing to include in the new DTV Table of Allotments (DTV Table), which, if adopted, would be codified in Section 73.622( i) of the rules (see Appendix A.). The table includes a proposed DTV channel assignment for all television stations that are eligible under the qualifying criteria, set forth in the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order and reiterated in the discussion above. The proposed technical facilities parameters, which were also used for calculation of the tabulated engineering information, were developed in the three- round channel election process that the Commission conducted to create the proposed DTV Table. These technical facilities data are also available in an EXCEL format at http:// www. fcc. gov/ dtv. Data Elements Facility ID: A five- digit code for identification of TV or DTV stations associated with channel allotments. A unique code is assigned to each station at the time the Commission first receives an application for a construction permit for that station and does not change, even where the license for the station changes ownership or major changes are made to the station, such as a change of channel or community. City and State: The city and state to which the channel is allotted and the station is licensed to serve. NTSC Channel: The station’s current analog (NTSC) channel. This field is left blank in the case of stations that are only licensed to operate digital television service. If a station currently operates only an analog channel, that analog channel will appear in this field. Note: Stations must cease analog operations at the end of the DTV transition on February 17, 2009. See 47 U. S. C. § 309( j)( 14)( A). DTV Channel: The channel proposed for the station’s post- transition DTV operation. DTV Power: The effective radiated power (ERP) proposed for the station’s post- transition DTV operation. This value is the ERP specified for the station’s post- transition operation in the channel election process and, accordingly, may be the station’s: (1) currently authorized ERP, (2) 1997 service replication ERP, (3) other allowable value to which it agreed to operate to resolve a conflict or as part of a negotiated agreement in the channel election process; or (4) in 51 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 52 cases where a station’s proposed DTV channel is not its current DTV channel, a value determined by the Commission that will enable the station to provide coverage of the station’s service area as specified in the channel election process. The value shown is the maximum, over a set of uniformly spaced compass directions, of the ERP values used in determining the station’s specified noise- limited DTV service contour. This value is used in the calculations of service and interference also shown herein. In cases where the TV Engineering Database indicated employment of a directional antenna, the ERP in each specific direction was determined through linear interpolation of the relative field values describing the directional pattern. (The directional pattern stored in the FCC computer database provides relative field values at 10 degree intervals and may include additional values in special directions. The result of linear interpolation of these relative field values is squared and multiplied by the overall maximum ERP listed for the station in the TV Engineering Database to find the ERP in a specific direction.) Where a station’s ERP was determined by the Commission, it was calculated using the following methodology. First, the distance to the station’s noise- limited DTV contour (or Grade B contour for stations that do not have a DTV channel) was determined in each of 360 uniformly spaced compass directions starting from true north. This determination was made using information in the engineering database, including directional antenna data, and using terrain elevation data at points separated by 3 arc- seconds of longitude and latitude. FCC curves (47 C. F. R. §73.699) were applied in the usual way, as described in 47 C. F. R. §73.684, to find this noise- limited contour distance, with the exception that dipole factor considerations were applied to the field strength contour specified in 47 CFR §73.683 for UHF channels. The station’s proposed post- transition DTV ERP was then calculated by a further application of FCC curves, with noise- limited DTV coverage defined as the presence of field strengths of 28 dBu, 36 dBu, and 41 dBuas set forth in Section 73. 622( e) of the rules, respectively for low- VHF, high- VHF and UHF, at 50 percent of locations and 90 percent of the time. The family of FCC propagation curves for predicting field strength at 50 percent of locations 90 percent of the time is found by the formula F( 50, 90) = F( 50, 50) - [F( 50, 10) - F( 50, 50)]. That is, the F( 50, 90) value is lower than F( 50, 50) by the same amount that F( 50, 10) exceeds F( 50, 50). At UHF, the precise value 41 dBuwas applied for channel 38; and the value used for other UHF channels is 41 dBu plus a dipole factor modification. This results in reception on channel 14 needing 2.3 dB less, and channel 69 needing 2.3 dB more, than the 41 dBufor channel 38. The dipole factor modification used in ERP calculations is equal to 20 times log10 of the ratio of the center frequency of the UHF channel of interest to the center frequency of channel 38. In general, these computations of a station’s DTV power on a new channel to match the distance to its noise- limited contour result in ERP values, which vary with azimuth. For example, the azimuthal ERP pattern that replicates for a UHF channel, the noise- limited contour of an omnidirectional VHF operation will be somewhat different because terrain has a different effect on propagation in the two bands. Thus, the procedure described here effectively derives a new directional antenna pattern wherever necessary for a precise match according to FCC curves. 52 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 53 Finally, the ERP specified for a station’s new UHF DTV channel was limited so that it does not exceed 1 megawatt. This was done by scaling the azimuthal power pattern rather than by truncation. For example, if replication by FCC curves as described above requires an ERP of 1.2 megawatts, the power pattern is reduced by a factor of 1.2 in all directions. The azimuthal pattern is used in subsequent service and interference calculations for the station. Antenna Height: The height of the station’s transmitting antenna above average terrain, that is, antenna height above average terrain (antenna HAAT). In general, the antenna HAAT value shown for each station is the same as that specified for the station in the channel election process. This value represents the height of the radiation center of the station whose service area is being replicated, above terrain averaged from 3.2 to 16.1 kilometers (2 to 10 miles) from the station’s transmitter site, over 8 evenly spaced radials. In computations of service coverage and interference, the value of antenna HAAT was determined every 5 degrees directly from the terrain elevation data, and by linear interpolation for compass directions in between. Antenna ID: A six digit number that identifies the radiation pattern for the station’s transmitting antenna that is stored in the Commission’s Consolidated Database System (CDBS). In cases where a station’s proposed post- transition channel is the same as its currently assigned DTV channel, the station’s antenna pattern is the same as its certified facilities antenna. In other cases, such as where a station chose its analog channel or a different channel, or where the Commission’s staff selected a “best available” channel for the station’s post- transition operation, the antenna pattern for the station was developed by our computer software to allow the station to replicate the coverage area reached by operation at its certified facilities on its proposed channel (i. e., the station’s TCD from the channel election process); or the station has indicated that it would use a particular antenna for its post- transition operation in the channel election process, the station’s antenna pattern is the same as specified in Schedule B of FCC Forms 383 and 385. These antenna patterns are used in the calculation of service area and interference. The CDBS can be accessed on the Internet at www. fcc. gov/ mb/ cdbs. html. Transmitter Latitude: The geographic latitude coordinates of the station’s transmitter location. Transmitter Longitude: The geographic longitude coordinates of the station’s transmitter location. Service Area, Service Population, and Percent Interference Received: Under the heading “DIGITAL TELEVISION SERVICE AFTER THE TRANSITION,” prospective conditions are evaluated in terms of both area and population. The values tabulated under this heading are net values: service area is the area where the desired signal is above the DTV noise threshold, less the area where service receives predicted interference from other DTV stations. Similarly, the number of people served is the population receiving an adequate signal relative to noise excluding people in areas with predicted interference. The level of interference received to a station’s service is calculated based on desired- to- undesired (D/ U) ratios, and these levels must be above certain threshold values for acceptable service. The percent interference received value is the percentage of the station’s otherwise noise- limited service area that is affected by predicted interference from other DTV stations. The threshold values used to prepare the interference estimates in this appendix are those set forth in Section 73.623( c) of the rules, 47 C. F. R. § 53 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 54 73.623( c). The procedure used to identify areas of service and interference is that specified in OET Bulletin No. 69. See OET Bulletin No. 69, Longley- Rice Methodology for Evaluating TV Coverage and Interference, February 6, 2004 (“ OET Bulletin No. 69”), available at www. fcc. gov/ Bureaus/ Engineering_ Technology/ Documents/ bulletins/ oet69/ oet69. pdf. [Note: Proposed DTV Table of Allotments Information is also attached separately in Microsoft Excel format.] 54 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 55 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 21488 AK ANCHORAGE 5 5 45 277 74343 612010 1493046 45353 348 0 804 AK ANCHORAGE 7 8 50 240 67898 612522 1495220 26532 317 0 10173 AK ANCHORAGE 2 10 21 240 67943 612522 1495220 22841 317 0 13815 AK ANCHORAGE 13 12 41 240 65931 612522 1495220 25379 317 0 35655 AK ANCHORAGE 4 20 234 55 74791 611311 1495324 10885 302 0 83503 AK ANCHORAGE 9 26 1000 212 74792 610402 1494436 23703 323 0 49632 AK ANCHORAGE 11 28 52 61 64802 611133 1495401 7946 296 0 25221 AK ANCHORAGE 33 32 50 33 74793 610957 1494102 8943 287 0 4983 AK BETHEL 4 3 1 61 74794 604733 1614622 10324 9 0 64597 AK FAIRBANKS 7 7 3.2 214 74449 645520 1474255 11355 82 0 69315 AK FAIRBANKS 9 9 3.2 152 74463 645442 1474638 6623 81 0 49621 AK FAIRBANKS 11 11 3.2 1 74991 645036 1474248 5673 82 0 13813 AK FAIRBANKS 2 18 60 33 74795 645042 1474252 6901 82 0 8651 AK JUNEAU 3 10 0.748 1 581804 1342521 3982 30 0 13814 AK JUNEAU 8 11 3 33 74796 581806 1342629 5513 30 0 60520 AK KETCHIKAN 4 13 3.2 1 29997 552059 1314012 4355 15 0 20015 AK NORTH POLE 4 4 1 5 74432 644532 1471926 6293 82 0 60519 AK SITKA 13 2 1 1 570301 1352004 6898 8 0 56642 AL ANNISTON 40 9 15.6 359 39744 333624 862503 24554 1437 6.6 71325 AL BESSEMER 17 18 350 675 44013 332851 872403 37533 1549 1.4 717 AL BIRMINGHAM 10 10 3 426 332904 864825 22745 1363 4.9 74173 AL BIRMINGHAM 13 13 16.9 408 75054 332926 864748 31517 1646 1.9 5360 AL BIRMINGHAM 42 30 1000 426 43265 332904 864825 31006 1687 0.4 16820 AL BIRMINGHAM 68 36 885 406 68103 332904 864825 28264 1553 1.1 71221 AL BIRMINGHAM 6 50 1000 420 74797 332919 864758 33118 1692 0.9 720 AL DEMOPOLIS 41 19 1000 324 60739 322145 875204 26322 330 6.5 43846 AL DOTHAN 18 21 1000 223 311425 851843 24804 451 0 4152 AL DOTHAN 4 36 995 573 305510 854428 43948 886 0.4 714 AL DOZIER 2 10 3.2 393 74361 313316 862332 23623 353 8.7 65128 AL FLORENCE 15 14 1000 431 66619 350009 870809 30313 1112 0 6816 AL FLORENCE 26 20 50 230 74798 343438 874657 15572 355 1.7 715 AL FLORENCE 36 22 556 202 343441 874702 20778 544 0.2 1002 AL GADSDEN 60 26 150 315 29932 334853 862655 17740 1379 0.2 55 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 56 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 73312 AL GADSDEN 44 45 225 309 43164 335327 862813 17701 1357 0.1 83943 AL GULF SHORES 55 25 64.5 308 74787 303640 873626 15544 932 0 74138 AL HOMEWOOD 21 28 1000 409 29634 332904 864825 31285 1678 1 48693 AL HUNTSVILLE 19 19 40.7 514 344419 863156 23609 992 2.2 713 AL HUNTSVILLE 25 24 396 340 344413 863145 27052 1092 0.7 57292 AL HUNTSVILLE 31 32 50 546 74799 344415 863202 24520 1018 0.4 28119 AL HUNTSVILLE 54 41 400 518 43864 344412 863159 29827 1213 1 591 AL HUNTSVILLE 48 49 41 552 344239 863207 22282 936 0.8 710 AL LOUISVILLE 43 44 925 262 59887 314304 852603 18777 337 0.1 4143 AL MOBILE 10 9 29 381 304117 874754 34970 1203 0 11906 AL MOBILE 15 15 510 558 74580 303640 873627 35605 1284 0.5 60827 AL MOBILE 21 20 500 436 42051 303518 873316 27240 1215 0 83740 AL MOBILE 23 337 574 75124 303645 873843 38025 1283 0 73187 AL MOBILE 5 27 1000 581 74800 304120 874949 45411 1406 0.3 721 AL MOBILE 42 41 199 185 303933 875333 16297 912 0.1 13993 AL MONTGOMERY 12 12 24.9 507 74369 315828 860944 31615 788 0.5 73642 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 1000 518 29552 315828 860944 37695 829 1.3 706 AL MONTGOMERY 26 27 568 176 322255 861733 18017 549 3.7 72307 AL MONTGOMERY 32 32 199 545 75049 320830 864443 28414 579 0.6 60829 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 500 308 28430 322413 861147 21909 641 0.3 711 AL MOUNT CHEAHA 7 7 19 610 74635 332907 854833 40921 2236 2.9 11113 AL OPELIKA 66 47 136 539 74487 321916 844728 24321 662 1.3 32851 AL OZARK 34 33 15 151 68078 311228 853649 8868 244 0 84802 AL SELMA 29 29 1000 408 32810 323227 865033 26729 620 5.9 701 AL SELMA 8 42 787 507 320858 864651 38739 722 0.1 62207 AL TROY 67 48 50 345 30182 320336 855701 14891 479 2 77496 AL TUSCALOOSA 23 23 50 266 74752 330315 873257 13651 355 0.1 21258 AL TUSCALOOSA 33 33 160 625 70330 332848 872550 30995 1357 0.5 68427 AL TUSKEGEE 22 22 100 325 74464 320336 855702 17779 532 0.4 2768 AR ARKADELPHIA 9 13 7.3 320 335426 930646 22157 299 16.9 86534 AR CAMDEN 49 49 68.1 175 74782 331619 924212 13417 146 0.5 92872 AR EL DORADO 12 6 541 65573 330441 921341 19618 362 19.4 35692 AR EL DORADO 10 27 734 605 74801 330441 921341 43603 631 5.5 56 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 57 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 84164 AR EL DORADO 43 43 206 530 74776 330441 921341 26259 446 0.1 81593 AR EUREKA SPRINGS 34 34 87.1 213 75069 362630 935825 12963 442 0.1 2767 AR FAYETTEVILLE 13 9 19 501 354853 940141 35150 889 1.5 60354 AR FAYETTEVILLE 29 15 180 266 360057 940459 19569 560 3.5 66469 AR FORT SMITH 5 18 550 286 354949 940924 25959 736 0.2 60353 AR FORT SMITH 40 21 325 602 350415 944043 33811 525 7.4 29560 AR FORT SMITH 24 27 200 305 41354 354236 940815 19242 627 0.7 78314 AR HARRISON 31 31 191 339 75064 364218 930345 18376 533 2.8 608 AR HOT SPRINGS 26 26 66.4 258 74370 342221 930247 13726 250 0.1 13988 AR JONESBORO 8 8 18 531 74348 355322 905608 39540 689 0.2 2769 AR JONESBORO 19 20 50 310 355414 904614 18806 312 0 2784 AR JONESBORO 48 48 982 295 75036 353616 903118 24784 1386 0 2770 AR LITTLE ROCK 2 7 8.06 548 74338 342631 921303 30372 952 0 2787 AR LITTLE ROCK 11 12 55 519 344757 922959 41233 1110 2.4 33543 AR LITTLE ROCK 7 22 750 574 342824 921210 43307 1087 0.3 11951 AR LITTLE ROCK 16 30 1000 449 40344 344757 922929 32289 1043 0 33440 AR LITTLE ROCK 4 32 1000 503 74802 344757 922959 39177 1098 0.6 58267 AR LITTLE ROCK 36 36 50 394 74768 344756 922945 16626 809 0.2 37005 AR LITTLE ROCK 42 44 1000 485 59098 344745 922944 31868 1038 0.5 2777 AR MOUNTAIN VIEW 6 13 4.05 407 66439 354847 921724 20292 260 14.5 607 AR PINE BLUFF 25 24 725 356 40413 343155 920241 24562 845 0 41212 AR PINE BLUFF 38 39 1000 590 40345 342631 921303 34162 1006 0 29557 AR ROGERS 51 50 1000 267 362447 935716 23556 643 0 67347 AR SPRINGDALE 57 39 316 114 40726 361107 941749 12789 422 0.1 81441 AZ DOUGLAS 3 36 1000 9 74708 312208 1093145 10673 34 0 24749 AZ FLAGSTAFF 2 2 7.25 465 74450 345806 1113028 33788 270 0.2 41517 AZ FLAGSTAFF 13 13 19.6 474 74998 345805 1113029 29913 203 0 74149 AZ FLAGSTAFF 4 18 726 487 74804 345804 1113030 34193 227 0 35104 AZ FLAGSTAFF 9 32 1000 343 345806 1113029 32388 215 0.8 63927 AZ GREEN VALLEY 46 46 70.8 1095 74581 322454 1104256 26056 802 0 81458 AZ HOLBROOK 11 11 3.2 54 74722 345505 1100825 8819 16 0 24753 AZ KINGMAN 6 19 1000 585 74805 350157 1142156 30420 175 0 35486 AZ MESA 12 12 22 543 74517 332000 1120348 33724 3236 0 57 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 58 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 2728 AZ PHOENIX 8 8 30.7 527 75007 332000 1120349 35929 3239 0 35587 AZ PHOENIX 10 10 22.2 558 74488 332003 1120343 34519 3236 0 59440 AZ PHOENIX 15 15 218 509 74636 332000 1120346 28668 3229 0 41223 AZ PHOENIX 5 17 1000 507 67336 332002 1120340 31756 3237 0 67868 AZ PHOENIX 21 20 500 489 332002 1120342 30913 3232 0 40993 AZ PHOENIX 3 24 1000 501 43557 332001 1120345 31415 3234 0 68886 AZ PHOENIX 45 26 1000 517 33195 332001 1120332 32353 3237 0 35705 AZ PHOENIX 33 33 196 510 74503 332000 1120346 22493 3226 0 83491 AZ PHOENIX 39 39 50 491 332001 1120344 18695 3211 0 7143 AZ PHOENIX 61 49 531 497 43560 332002 1120344 24945 3227 0 35811 AZ PRESCOTT 7 7 3.2 850 74984 344115 1120701 24427 266 0.6 35095 AZ SIERRA VISTA 58 44 1000 319 65401 314532 1104803 18972 893 0 26655 AZ TOLLESON 51 51 197 546 74584 332003 1120338 25018 3227 0 36918 AZ TUCSON 9 9 9.23 1134 74508 322454 1104259 39703 999 0.1 11908 AZ TUCSON 18 19 480 1123 59934 322456 1104250 37731 924 0.1 25735 AZ TUCSON 4 23 405 1123 68106 322456 1104250 35035 914 0.2 44052 AZ TUCSON 11 25 480 1123 64314 322456 1104250 35738 911 0.2 2722 AZ TUCSON 27 28 50 178 42999 321253 1110021 8550 831 0 2731 AZ TUCSON 6 30 668 1092 322455 1104251 45415 983 0 48663 AZ TUCSON 13 32 108 1123 43979 322456 1104250 25638 807 0.7 30601 AZ TUCSON 40 40 396 621 74564 321456 1110658 22249 933 0 74449 AZ YUMA 11 11 22.3 468 74556 330310 1144940 34281 326 0 33639 AZ YUMA 13 16 510 475 74806 330317 1144934 28310 324 0 24518 CA ANAHEIM 56 32 1000 937 68180 341335 1180358 38204 15487 0.1 8263 CA ARCATA 23 22 50 510 74807 404336 1235818 20016 120 0 29234 CA AVALON 54 47 350 937 66764 341337 1180357 31305 14729 0 40878 CA BAKERSFIELD 23 10 4.6 1128 74808 352714 1183537 23144 841 0 34459 CA BAKERSFIELD 17 25 135 405 44570 352617 1184422 18738 698 0 4148 CA BAKERSFIELD 29 33 110 1128 27939 352711 1183525 24592 992 0 7700 CA BAKERSFIELD 45 45 210 387 74619 352620 1184424 16819 697 0 63865 CA BARSTOW 64 44 1000 596 343634 1171711 27479 1578 0 83825 CA BISHOP 20 20 50 928 74744 372443 1181106 16923 23 0 40517 CA CALIPATRIA 54 36 155 476 75040 330302 1144938 20044 318 0 58 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 59 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 4939 CA CERES 23 15 15 172 372934 1211329 11340 1202 0 33745 CA CHICO 24 24 331 537 74518 401531 1220524 28699 422 0 24508 CA CHICO 12 43 1000 396 74809 395730 1214248 25916 597 1.5 23302 CA CLOVIS 43 43 283 642 75024 364446 1191657 31884 1452 0.1 21533 CA CONCORD 42 14 50 856 74701 375334 1215353 31816 8599 0 19783 CA CORONA 52 39 54 912 41582 341247 1180341 21865 14174 0 57945 CA COTATI 22 23 110 628 68181 382054 1223438 23262 4471 0 51208 CA EL CENTRO 9 9 19.5 414 75031 330319 1144944 31675 325 0 36170 CA EL CENTRO 7 22 1000 477 36690 330302 1144938 33276 325 0 53382 CA EUREKA 3 3 8.39 503 74390 404352 1235706 35110 149 0 55435 CA EUREKA 13 11 40 550 404338 1235817 39817 149 0 42640 CA EUREKA 6 17 30 550 44483 404339 1235817 17975 118 0 58618 CA EUREKA 29 28 119 381 28858 404336 1235826 15820 121 0 8378 CA FORT BRAGG 8 8 44.9 733 74379 394138 1233443 38724 143 0.2 67494 CA FRESNO 53 7 38 560 29423 370423 1192552 33624 1631 0.2 8620 CA FRESNO 30 30 182 614 74349 370437 1192601 22938 1437 0.1 56034 CA FRESNO 47 34 185 577 44959 370414 1192531 24853 1422 0.1 35594 CA FRESNO 24 38 528 601 74391 370419 1192549 30409 1541 0.1 69733 CA FRESNO 18 40 250 698 67432 364445 1191651 29501 1441 0 34439 CA HANFORD 21 20 350 580 29793 370422 1192550 28070 1509 0 4328 CA HUNTINGTON BEACH 50 48 855 921 64663 341337 1180357 36556 15107 0.3 35608 CA LONG BEACH 18 18 111 889 75204 341250 1180340 19277 14109 2.8 282 CA LOS ANGELES 7 7 11.2 978 74603 341337 1180358 37220 15572 0.1 21422 CA LOS ANGELES 9 9 12 951 69629 341338 1180400 34447 15439 0 22208 CA LOS ANGELES 11 11 40.2 902 74702 341329 1180348 40526 15807 0.1 33742 CA LOS ANGELES 13 13 14.1 899 74704 341342 1180402 36927 15505 0 13058 CA LOS ANGELES 28 28 107 913 70604 341326 1180343 21994 14312 1.9 35670 CA LOS ANGELES 5 31 1000 954 32823 341336 1180356 42312 15543 0.2 35123 CA LOS ANGELES 34 34 392 956 74509 341336 1180359 31607 15014 0 47906 CA LOS ANGELES 4 36 711 984 74810 341332 1180352 41039 15464 0 38430 CA LOS ANGELES 58 41 162 901 41475 341326 1180345 22054 13992 1 26231 CA LOS ANGELES 22 42 486 892 42167 341247 1180341 24664 14427 1.1 59 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 60 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 9628 CA LOS ANGELES 2 43 300 947 69117 341338 1180400 31477 14811 0.5 58608 CA MERCED 51 11 58 575 75200 370419 1192549 35621 1691 0 58609 CA MODESTO 19 18 500 555 36726 380707 1204327 29812 3331 0 35611 CA MONTEREY 67 31 50 701 29629 364523 1213005 14541 1065 42.1 26249 CA MONTEREY 46 32 46 758 44481 363205 1213714 16387 761 9 49153 CA NOVATO 68 47 1000 402 28688 380900 1223531 15940 5258 3 35703 CA OAKLAND 2 44 811 433 74637 374519 1222706 23016 6336 0 60549 CA ONTARIO 46 29 400 937 68117 341336 1180359 32827 14946 1.2 56384 CA OXNARD 63 24 85 533 40843 341949 1190124 16906 2413 38.5 25577 CA PALM SPRINGS 42 42 50 219 72090 335158 1162602 7335 372 4.4 16749 CA PALM SPRINGS 36 46 50 207 74811 335200 1162556 7220 371 0 58605 CA PARADISE 30 20 661 448 27908 395750 1214238 23929 576 0 35512 CA PORTERVILLE 61 48 197 804 38116 361714 1185017 27708 1741 0 55083 CA RANCHO PALOS VERDES 44 51 1000 937 65079 341335 1180357 33638 15007 0 8291 CA REDDING 7 7 11.6 1106 74504 403610 1223900 38353 371 0.1 47285 CA REDDING 9 9 9.69 1097 74412 403609 1223901 37993 370 1.4 22161 CA RIVERSIDE 62 45 670 907 74510 341250 1180340 31637 15069 0 35855 CA SACRAMENTO 6 9 19.2 567 74604 381618 1213018 33919 5291 13.9 25048 CA SACRAMENTO 10 10 16.6 595 74695 381424 1213003 37093 6313 0 51499 CA SACRAMENTO 31 21 850 581 381554 1212924 39963 6384 0 33875 CA SACRAMENTO 3 35 1000 591 74812 381552 1212922 37892 5069 17.4 10205 CA SACRAMENTO 40 40 765 581 70334 381618 1213018 31502 4587 4.2 52953 CA SACRAMENTO 29 48 1000 489 44981 381554 1212924 30324 4218 1.1 19653 CA SALINAS 8 8 19.2 736 70343 364523 1213005 28847 2561 14.8 14867 CA SALINAS 35 13 19.8 720 44925 364522 1213006 23793 1122 49.2 58795 CA SAN BERNARDINO 24 26 440 529 335757 1171705 20478 13150 0 58978 CA SAN BERNARDINO 30 38 1000 909 46152 341246 1180341 23334 14423 0 42122 CA SAN DIEGO 8 8 5.42 208 74621 325016 1171456 18230 2929 0 40876 CA SAN DIEGO 10 10 11 205 74985 325020 1171456 19575 2948 0.7 10238 CA SAN DIEGO 51 18 355 576 39587 324150 1165604 29082 2910 3.5 58827 CA SAN DIEGO 69 19 323 598 65036 324147 1165607 29443 3106 0.2 6124 CA SAN DIEGO 15 30 350 567 33507 324153 1165603 27819 3013 0.3 60 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 61 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 35277 CA SAN DIEGO 39 40 370 563 68010 324148 1165606 26970 2968 0.3 34470 CA SAN FRANCISCO 7 7 21 509 74465 374520 1222705 32516 6516 7.3 51189 CA SAN FRANCISCO 20 19 383 418 19024 374519 1222706 22989 6360 1 37511 CA SAN FRANCISCO 26 27 500 403 67202 374112 1222603 21218 6116 1.8 25452 CA SAN FRANCISCO 5 29 1000 506 74813 374520 1222705 36742 7115 0 35500 CA SAN FRANCISCO 9 30 709 509 74814 374520 1222705 33396 6579 4.7 43095 CA SAN FRANCISCO 32 33 50 491 74815 374520 1222705 16151 5924 0.1 65526 CA SAN FRANCISCO 4 38 712 446 74655 374519 1222706 23056 6322 1.7 71586 CA SAN FRANCISCO 38 39 1000 428 29544 374519 1222706 24293 6266 4 69619 CA SAN FRANCISCO 44 45 206 491 74816 374520 1222705 16434 5799 2.1 33778 CA SAN FRANCISCO 14 51 476 701 28493 372957 1215216 19534 6377 0.1 35280 CA SAN JOSE 11 12 103 377 64426 374107 1222601 36145 6703 0.1 34564 CA SAN JOSE 36 36 740 668 74585 372917 1215159 28572 6601 4.5 22644 CA SAN JOSE 65 41 1000 418 60706 374115 1222601 23495 6250 3.3 64987 CA SAN JOSE 48 49 257 688 38067 372957 1215216 21071 6083 1.5 35663 CA SAN JOSE 54 50 290 662 34197 372917 1215159 16608 6021 1.7 19654 CA SAN LUIS OBISPO 6 15 1000 515 28386 352137 1203918 30360 439 0 12930 CA SAN LUIS OBISPO 33 34 82 441 44369 352138 1203921 18410 410 0.2 58912 CA SAN MATEO 60 43 536 428 44617 374519 1222706 20821 6089 2.4 59013 CA SANGER 59 36 372 600 43974 370437 1192601 27078 1440 0 67884 CA SANTA ANA 40 23 50 881 74817 341327 1180344 22547 13672 6 12144 CA SANTA BARBARA 38 21 1000 923 33205 343128 1195735 36089 1343 0 60637 CA SANTA BARBARA 3 27 699 917 74818 343132 1195728 42071 1298 2.1 63165 CA SANTA MARIA 12 19 188 591 74819 345437 1201108 26167 413 0 34440 CA SANTA ROSA 50 32 19.9 928 72086 384010 1223752 18189 742 4.5 56550 CA STOCKTON 13 25 1000 594 32519 381424 1213003 39491 6024 7.9 20871 CA STOCKTON 64 26 425 599 71124 381424 1213003 27821 4135 4.8 10242 CA STOCKTON 58 46 600 580 381554 1212924 33050 4788 9.9 16729 CA TWENTYNINE PALMS 23 150 784 36709 340217 1164847 20828 1929 44.4 51429 CA VALLEJO 66 34 150 419 39592 374519 1222706 17332 5881 3.2 14000 CA VENTURA 57 49 1000 937 65163 341335 1180357 34722 15066 0 51488 CA VISALIA 26 28 219 763 28096 364002 1185242 30550 1433 0 61 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 62 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 16950 CA VISALIA 49 50 185 834 361714 1185017 31085 1753 0 8214 CA WATSONVILLE 25 25 81.1 699 70678 364522 1213004 17432 1895 7.1 57219 CO BOULDER 14 15 200 351 66988 394017 1051306 21679 2934 0 22685 CO BROOMFIELD 12 38 1000 730 38280 394055 1052949 31357 2941 0 37101 CO CASTLE ROCK 53 46 300 178 30026 392557 1043918 13108 2332 0 35037 CO COLORADO SPRINGS 11 10 20.1 725 20589 384441 1045141 29268 959 54 35991 CO COLORADO SPRINGS 21 22 51 641 44318 384443 1045140 22342 1109 0 52579 CO COLORADO SPRINGS 13 24 459 652 74820 384445 1045138 30518 2149 0 40875 CO DENVER 7 7 37.4 295 74403 394350 1051353 24932 2899 2 23074 CO DENVER 9 9 39.6 318 74392 394350 1051353 25732 2925 1.8 14040 CO DENVER 6 18 1000 292 74821 394349 1051500 25306 2939 0.4 68581 CO DENVER 20 19 1000 295 44187 394350 1051353 24975 2948 0.3 126 CO DENVER 31 32 1000 314 30041 394345 1051412 23205 2875 0 35883 CO DENVER 2 34 1000 318 394358 1051408 26818 2981 0.2 47903 CO DENVER 4 35 1000 373 44452 394351 1051354 25932 2957 0.2 20476 CO DENVER 41 40 74.8 344 393559 1051235 17700 2624 0 68695 CO DENVER 59 43 145 356 74822 394024 1051303 17371 2700 0.4 24514 CO DENVER 50 51 900 233 36173 394358 1051408 19718 2711 0 48589 CO DURANGO 6 15 46 90 44437 371546 1075358 8794 91 0 84224 CO DURANGO 20 46 130 65291 371546 1075358 7843 65 0 82613 CO DURANGO 33 33 50 122 75068 371546 1075345 6607 54 0 125 CO FORT COLLINS 22 21 1000 233 403832 1044905 25510 1284 0 70578 CO GLENWOOD SPRINGS 3 23 879 771 74823 392505 1072201 26213 110 0 70596 CO GRAND JUNCTION 5 2 1 -23 74824 390515 1083356 8618 129 0 52593 CO GRAND JUNCTION 8 7 9.7 829 74825 390255 1081506 31964 185 0 24766 CO GRAND JUNCTION 11 12 10.8 429 74826 390400 1084441 21114 141 0.4 31597 CO GRAND JUNCTION 4 15 71.5 422 74827 390356 1084452 12523 131 0 14042 CO GRAND JUNCTION 18 18 51.2 883 74404 390314 1081513 19336 121 0 38375 CO LONGMONT 25 29 650 358 68107 400557 1045348 24325 2840 0 62 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 63 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 70579 CO MONTROSE 10 13 3.2 24 74828 383102 1075112 8771 58 1.1 69170 CO PUEBLO 8 8 20.3 727 74992 384444 1045139 29601 900 56.5 59014 CO PUEBLO 5 42 1000 396 74829 382225 1043327 28419 745 0.1 20373 CO STEAMBOAT SPRINGS 24 10 0.481 175 44199 402743 1065057 6228 29 0 63158 CO STERLING 3 23 599 204 403457 1030156 21554 73 0 70493 CT BRIDGEPORT 43 42 1000 156 412143 730648 18425 5544 2.5 13594 CT BRIDGEPORT 49 49 50 222 74586 411643 731108 10597 3792 3.3 147 CT HARTFORD 61 31 380 506 66902 414213 724957 23488 3645 16.3 53115 CT HARTFORD 3 33 1000 289 44846 414630 724820 21115 3536 16.1 13602 CT HARTFORD 24 45 465 505 65933 414213 724957 26781 4223 1.4 3072 CT HARTFORD 18 46 217 269 414630 724804 16467 3302 7.6 74170 CT NEW BRITAIN 30 35 250 434 65777 414202 724957 24350 4252 3.8 13595 CT NEW HAVEN 65 6 0.4 88 411942 725425 9116 2740 9.2 74109 CT NEW HAVEN 8 10 20.5 342 65037 412522 725706 25655 6252 11.5 33081 CT NEW HAVEN 59 39 170 301 46284 412522 725706 17709 4376 2.9 51980 CT NEW LONDON 26 26 76 363 74505 412504 721155 18595 3357 0.7 13607 CT NORWICH 53 9 3.2 192 75021 413114 721003 11997 1198 29.8 14050 CT WATERBURY 20 20 58.5 515 74364 414213 724957 21645 3935 9.5 1051 DC WASHINGTON 7 7 15 254 74539 385701 770447 22232 7053 0.2 65593 DC WASHINGTON 9 9 17 254 74506 385701 770447 22544 7075 0.3 65670 DC WASHINGTON 26 27 90 254 66360 385701 770447 16074 6626 1.6 27772 DC WASHINGTON 32 33 100 254 385701 770447 17550 6781 0.1 51567 DC WASHINGTON 20 35 500 254 385701 770447 21882 7046 0.2 22207 DC WASHINGTON 5 36 1000 235 74830 385721 770457 22214 7092 0.8 47904 DC WASHINGTON 4 48 1000 237 74831 385624 770454 22223 7074 0.1 30576 DC WASHINGTON 50 50 123 253 75050 385744 770136 17031 6767 0.1 72335 DE SEAFORD 64 44 98 196 66096 383915 753642 11086 465 7.4 72338 DE WILMINGTON 12 12 9.9 294 74622 400230 751424 21656 7752 1.6 51984 DE WILMINGTON 61 31 200 374 39302 400230 751411 18478 6836 9.5 51349 FL BOCA RATON 63 40 524 311 75025 255934 801027 20929 4837 0 6601 FL BRADENTON 66 42 210 476 274910 821539 28906 3722 1 70649 FL CAPE CORAL 36 35 930 404 67859 264742 814805 28363 1378 1.1 63 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 64 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 11125 FL CLEARWATER 22 21 1000 409 32885 274910 821539 26800 3503 0.1 53465 FL CLERMONT 18 17 1000 472 38022 283512 810458 36917 3225 0.1 6744 FL COCOA 68 30 182 491 38429 283635 810335 26292 2631 0 24582 FL COCOA 52 51 155 285 74832 281826 805448 14303 1971 0 25738 FL DAYTONA BEACH 2 11 54.9 511 41527 283635 810335 43816 3125 4.4 131 FL DAYTONA BEACH 26 49 150 459 285516 811909 25951 2645 0.1 81669 FL DESTIN 48 1000 318 65951 305952 864313 23444 743 1.5 64971 FL FORT LAUDERDALE 51 30 329 304 74587 255908 801137 20553 4770 0.2 22093 FL FORT MYERS 11 9 20 451 264801 814548 37693 1562 0 71085 FL FORT MYERS 20 15 1000 454 59198 264921 814554 36098 1643 0 62388 FL FORT MYERS 30 31 50 293 74833 264854 814544 17120 943 0.1 35575 FL FORT PIERCE 34 34 522 438 75041 270719 802320 28293 2144 0 29715 FL FORT PIERCE 21 38 700 303 30704 270132 801043 22697 2117 0 31570 FL FORT WALTON BEACH 53 40 33.5 219 29918 302409 865935 11996 581 0 54938 FL FORT WALTON BEACH 58 49 50 59 74834 302343 863011 3785 163 12 6554 FL FORT WALTON BEACH 35 50 1000 221 302346 865913 21954 689 0 83965 FL GAINESVILLE 29 9 3.2 278 75127 293747 823425 18457 501 1.7 16993 FL GAINESVILLE 20 16 91 287 74835 293211 822400 16264 707 0 69440 FL GAINESVILLE 5 36 1000 263 294234 822340 26470 1150 0 7727 FL HIGH SPRINGS 53 28 104 278 74836 293747 823424 13480 562 0 60536 FL HOLLYWOOD 69 47 575 297 43915 255909 801137 21946 4801 0 73130 FL JACKSONVILLE 7 7 16.2 288 74527 301651 813412 25919 1314 0.5 65046 FL JACKSONVILLE 12 13 25 310 301624 813313 31176 1381 1.6 35576 FL JACKSONVILLE 47 19 1000 291 42083 301651 813412 27268 1345 0.3 11909 FL JACKSONVILLE 30 32 1000 291 42562 301651 813412 25771 1324 0.2 29712 FL JACKSONVILLE 17 34 1000 283 29378 301636 813347 24697 1308 0 53116 FL JACKSONVILLE 4 42 976 294 41583 301624 813313 26562 1329 0 29719 FL JACKSONVILLE 59 44 1000 300 41428 301651 813412 24847 1311 0 72053 FL KEY WEST 22 3 1 62 74837 243318 814807 9983 45 0 27387 FL KEY WEST 8 8 3.2 33 74365 243419 814425 5713 45 0 64 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 65 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 27290 FL LAKE WORTH 67 36 1000 385 43353 263520 801244 28708 4345 12.9 53819 FL LAKELAND 32 19 1000 458 274910 821539 41503 4346 1.7 60018 FL LEESBURG 55 40 1000 514 32830 283511 810458 37198 3155 0.2 9881 FL LEESBURG 45 46 1000 472 59171 283512 810458 31806 3050 0.2 22245 FL LIVE OAK 57 48 1000 597 304051 835821 44034 970 0 81594 FL MARIANNA 51 51 50 254 74785 303042 852917 13673 278 0 5802 FL MELBOURNE 43 43 1000 300 74433 281822 805445 23789 2340 0.3 67602 FL MELBOURNE 56 48 1000 456 67869 280537 810728 31239 2955 3.5 63840 FL MIAMI 7 7 14.3 293 74968 255749 801244 28101 4869 0 53113 FL MIAMI 10 10 30 294 74350 255759 801244 27703 4931 0 13456 FL MIAMI 2 18 1000 309 30258 255730 801244 26169 4906 0 10203 FL MIAMI 39 19 1000 252 32748 255807 801320 21088 4813 0.2 66358 FL MIAMI 17 20 625 301 42558 255846 801146 23263 4880 0 47902 FL MIAMI 4 22 1000 298 255807 801320 31232 4922 0 73230 FL MIAMI 23 23 485 257 74466 255807 801320 18379 4714 0 63154 FL MIAMI 6 31 1000 311 255807 801320 30510 4920 0 12497 FL MIAMI 33 32 1000 263 41330 255802 801234 21017 4771 0 48608 FL MIAMI 35 35 242 282 74993 255909 801137 18162 4564 2.8 67971 FL MIAMI 45 46 500 308 36387 255934 801027 19031 4815 0 19183 FL NAPLES 26 41 1000 454 59197 264921 814554 32033 1491 2 61504 FL NAPLES 46 45 1000 456 33429 264708 814740 28232 1369 0.4 12171 FL NEW SMYRNA BEACH 15 33 308 491 59744 283635 810335 28477 2677 0.1 70651 FL OCALA 51 31 500 259 39152 292132 821943 19210 910 0.2 11893 FL ORANGE PARK 25 10 12 298 301624 813313 26958 1318 0.9 41225 FL ORLANDO 35 22 1000 392 28032 283613 810511 34755 2981 0.2 12855 FL ORLANDO 24 23 950 380 40155 283608 810537 32898 2991 0 71293 FL ORLANDO 6 26 547 516 71980 283635 810335 35732 2960 0.2 55454 FL ORLANDO 27 27 247 477 74371 283407 810316 32237 2872 0 72076 FL ORLANDO 9 39 1000 492 283407 810316 40585 3220 0.2 54940 FL ORLANDO 65 41 1000 515 283635 810335 40291 3165 2.7 11123 FL PALM BEACH 61 49 800 125 44853 264547 801219 13671 2395 0 73136 FL PANAMA CITY 7 7 52 244 74969 302600 852451 25857 372 0.4 65 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 66 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 2942 FL PANAMA CITY 28 9 2.3 142 67964 302342 853202 12161 238 2.4 66398 FL PANAMA CITY 13 13 35.5 405 74426 302108 852328 32536 721 0.1 6093 FL PANAMA CITY 56 38 49.2 137 302202 855528 12069 275 0 4354 FL PANAMA CITY BEACH 46 47 50 59 74838 301059 854642 5037 154 0 71363 FL PENSACOLA 3 17 1000 579 303645 873843 47474 1408 0 17611 FL PENSACOLA 23 31 1000 549 38343 303640 873626 33337 1253 0.1 10894 FL PENSACOLA 33 34 1000 415 33836 303735 873850 27979 1210 0 41210 FL PENSACOLA 44 45 1000 457 42957 303516 873313 28956 1244 0 61251 FL SARASOTA 40 24 116 233 74588 273321 822149 15298 2563 12 11290 FL ST. PETERSBURG 10 10 18.5 440 74467 281104 824539 31248 3396 0.2 4108 FL ST. PETERSBURG 38 38 1000 438 70212 275032 821546 30498 3664 0.1 74112 FL ST. PETERSBURG 44 44 463 452 74681 275052 821548 32518 3887 0.8 83929 FL STUART 44 773 80 74682 264337 800448 14826 2240 0 82735 FL TALLAHASSEE 24 24 39 65784 302940 842503 5308 304 0 41065 FL TALLAHASSEE 27 27 1000 487 74451 304006 835810 41970 951 0.1 21801 FL TALLAHASSEE 11 32 938 237 302131 843638 25384 516 0 66908 FL TALLAHASSEE 40 40 1000 600 70213 304051 835821 38440 784 0.1 64592 FL TAMPA 8 7 19 465 275032 821545 37899 4257 0.6 68569 FL TAMPA 13 12 72.3 436 17613 274908 821426 42687 4205 6.6 21808 FL TAMPA 3 13 17.1 473 75058 274948 821559 36363 4123 1.2 64588 FL TAMPA 28 29 987 475 67821 275032 821545 38497 4186 0 69338 FL TAMPA 16 34 475 453 275052 821548 32898 3939 2 60559 FL TAMPA 50 47 500 317 59290 275032 821545 22988 3453 0.3 51988 FL TEQUESTA 25 16 1000 454 29425 270717 802342 33467 2807 0.9 71580 FL TICE 49 33 1000 429 32880 264708 814741 27350 1275 0.4 16788 FL VENICE 62 25 750 472 39529 274910 821539 32426 3786 0.1 59443 FL WEST PALM BEACH 5 12 13.4 387 74623 263520 801243 29999 4818 0 52527 FL WEST PALM BEACH 12 13 29.5 291 39117 263518 801230 28983 4782 0 61084 FL WEST PALM BEACH 42 27 400 440 44609 263437 801432 26429 4992 0 39736 FL WEST PALM BEACH 29 28 630 458 38600 263437 801432 31715 5137 0 70713 GA ALBANY 10 10 18.2 272 74405 311952 835144 24614 626 1.2 70815 GA ALBANY 31 12 60 287 38373 311952 835143 28865 746 0.7 66 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 67 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 23948 GA ATHENS 8 8 15.6 305 74366 334818 840840 24589 4507 0.5 48813 GA ATHENS 34 48 1000 310 334826 842022 27603 4694 0.1 51163 GA ATLANTA 11 10 80 303 334524 841955 34627 4867 0.6 72120 GA ATLANTA 46 19 1000 329 334826 842022 32016 4822 0.1 64033 GA ATLANTA 17 20 1000 310 334826 842022 30474 4766 0.5 4190 GA ATLANTA 30 21 50 334 74839 334535 842007 17636 4101 4.3 22819 GA ATLANTA 36 25 500 332 334826 842022 26868 4612 2 70689 GA ATLANTA 5 27 1000 332 334751 842002 30601 4773 0.6 23960 GA ATLANTA 2 39 1000 301 65852 334551 842142 27454 4618 0.1 13206 GA ATLANTA 57 41 165 319 340359 842717 20717 4373 0.5 6900 GA ATLANTA 69 43 1000 335 334440 842136 29770 4733 0.1 73937 GA AUGUSTA 12 12 20.2 485 74489 332429 815036 37025 1357 0.6 70699 GA AUGUSTA 26 30 400 483 332420 815001 34939 1259 0.2 27140 GA AUGUSTA 6 42 1000 507 332420 815001 40539 1454 0 3228 GA AUGUSTA 54 51 37 363 67958 332500 815006 16372 615 0.1 23486 GA BAINBRIDGE 49 49 190 410 75042 303901 841213 20059 513 12.2 69446 GA BAXLEY 34 35 650 454 320335 812043 36067 827 0 71236 GA BRUNSWICK 21 24 650 403 40210 304917 814413 29871 1299 0 23942 GA CHATSWORTH 18 33 426 537 32774 344506 844254 27892 2790 0.9 23935 GA COCHRAN 29 7 22 369 322811 831517 32941 784 1.7 595 GA COLUMBUS 9 9 1 503 70342 321925 844646 22435 642 4.7 3359 GA COLUMBUS 3 15 1000 449 321925 844646 39856 1110 11.7 23918 GA COLUMBUS 28 23 250 462 33233 325108 844204 27159 1332 0.1 37179 GA COLUMBUS 38 35 50 399 74840 322728 845308 21298 660 0 12472 GA COLUMBUS 54 49 500 312 67961 322739 845243 20626 649 0.7 63867 GA CORDELE 55 51 200 109 315335 834818 14405 356 0.3 60825 GA DALTON 23 16 300 447 28422 345707 852258 25162 1180 2.9 23930 GA DAWSON 25 8 6 313 44505 315615 843315 19618 471 21 46991 GA MACON 13 13 30 238 324510 833332 27301 820 4.2 58262 GA MACON 24 16 1000 226 29738 324458 833335 21895 689 0.3 43847 GA MACON 41 40 50 237 74841 324512 833346 15033 537 0 24618 GA MACON 64 45 1000 223 60980 324551 833332 19160 655 0.8 68058 GA MONROE 63 44 700 303 334441 842136 25422 4531 0.2 67 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 68 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 23917 GA PELHAM 14 6 3.8 474 74339 304013 835626 30535 844 0 54728 GA PERRY 58 32 50 247 74842 324509 833335 15647 553 0 51969 GA ROME 14 51 1000 622 32746 341848 843855 35465 5192 0.4 23947 GA SAVANNAH 9 9 9.72 293 74979 320848 813705 22960 682 0.1 590 GA SAVANNAH 11 11 14.8 420 74380 320314 812101 28682 752 0 37174 GA SAVANNAH 22 22 166 436 74457 320330 812020 25120 667 0 48662 GA SAVANNAH 3 39 1000 442 320331 811755 37667 832 0.1 31590 GA THOMASVILLE 6 46 1000 619 304013 835626 45196 972 0.1 63329 GA TOCCOA 32 24 600 209 343644 832205 20917 1161 1.8 28155 GA VALDOSTA 44 43 50 253 40583 311018 832157 13316 328 0 23929 GA WAYCROSS 8 8 20 286 74351 311317 823424 28648 426 5.7 23937 GA WRENS 20 6 30 436 74332 331533 821709 25555 782 0 36914 HI HILO 9 9 3.2 33 74970 194300 1550813 10655 79 0 4146 HI HILO 11 11 3.35 33 74440 194357 1550404 5336 78 0 64544 HI HILO 13 13 3.73 1 74413 194357 1550404 6703 79 0 34846 HI HILO 2 22 8 1 44792 194351 1550411 1638 64 0.5 37103 HI HILO 14 23 35 33 28420 194300 1550813 7064 78 0 4144 HI HONOLULU 2 8 7.2 1 211746 1575036 11570 817 0 36917 HI HONOLULU 9 9 7 33 74971 211746 1575036 10027 826 0 51241 HI HONOLULU 38 10 3.2 580 74540 212345 1580558 23366 775 9.9 26431 HI HONOLULU 11 11 3.2 637 74414 212403 1580610 22771 862 0 34527 HI HONOLULU 20 19 60.7 606 43104 212351 1580600 16294 788 0 34445 HI HONOLULU 5 23 1000 629 74843 212403 1580610 31295 852 0.4 3246 HI HONOLULU 26 27 262 580 45219 212345 1580558 14530 829 0 36846 HI HONOLULU 14 31 50 33 28782 211849 1575143 6227 746 0 65395 HI HONOLULU 32 33 50 33 74844 211849 1575143 5067 758 0 34867 HI HONOLULU 13 35 550 33 74845 211709 1575019 10827 780 0 64548 HI HONOLULU 4 40 85 1 68040 211737 1575034 4992 767 1.4 27425 HI HONOLULU 44 43 6.46 577 212345 1580558 14133 764 0 83180 HI KAILUA 50 50 50 632 74783 211949 1574524 25899 841 0 664 HI KAILUA KONA 6 25 700 871 66907 194316 1555515 42674 64 3.4 77483 HI KANEOHE 66 41 297 632 211949 1574524 37079 778 8.5 4145 HI WAILUKU 7 7 3.69 1809 74519 204241 1561526 44292 146 0 68 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 69 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 26428 HI WAILUKU 10 10 3.2 1811 74479 204240 1561534 41901 131 2.2 64551 HI WAILUKU 12 12 3.94 1664 75008 204216 1561635 30905 139 0 34859 HI WAILUKU 15 16 50 1723 74846 204234 1561554 27836 135 0 37105 HI WAILUKU 21 21 53.1 1298 75029 204058 1561907 28579 146 0 36920 HI WAILUKU 3 24 72.4 1814 204241 1561535 48946 137 9.2 89714 HI WAIMANALO 56 38 50 632 74789 211949 1574524 27066 843 0 8661 IA AMES 5 5 3.91 613 74683 414947 933656 43150 987 0 51502 IA AMES 23 23 246 613 74753 414947 933656 38510 952 0 82619 IA AMES 34 34 50 150 75070 415849 934423 12603 598 0 7841 IA BURLINGTON 26 41 500 388 29888 410808 904830 26895 855 0.4 9719 IA CEDAR RAPIDS 9 9 19.2 607 74589 421859 915131 42342 970 0.8 35336 IA CEDAR RAPIDS 28 27 1000 449 29380 420525 920513 33845 815 0 21156 IA CEDAR RAPIDS 48 47 500 309 421717 915254 25135 694 0 25685 IA CEDAR RAPIDS 2 51 500 585 421859 915130 38136 900 0.1 29108 IA COUNCIL BLUFFS 32 33 200 98 411515 955008 13206 816 0 5471 IA DAVENPORT 36 34 150 102 412829 902645 12845 542 0.1 6885 IA DAVENPORT 6 36 696 329 74638 411844 902246 29295 999 0.2 54011 IA DAVENPORT 18 49 1000 344 44477 411844 902245 28483 958 0 33710 IA DES MOINES 8 8 29.4 566 74490 414835 933716 43186 984 1.2 29102 IA DES MOINES 11 11 19.8 600 75043 414833 933653 43121 984 0.3 66221 IA DES MOINES 13 13 36.1 609 74427 414947 933656 47714 1038 2.2 56527 IA DES MOINES 17 16 500 612 39534 414947 933656 40497 974 0 78915 IA DES MOINES 31 628 589 74639 414947 933656 37868 947 0.1 17625 IA DUBUQUE 40 43 800 262 39740 423109 903711 19008 305 0.9 29100 IA FORT DODGE 21 25 600 363 424903 942441 31286 337 4.1 29095 IA IOWA CITY 12 12 17.8 439 75030 414315 912030 35080 1111 0 35096 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 1000 419 39521 414329 912110 33132 1057 1.4 29086 IA MASON CITY 24 18 500 437 41152 432220 924959 30335 598 0 66402 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000 447 432220 924959 38283 717 1.2 81509 IA NEWTON 39 39 116 154 74772 414905 931232 11998 651 0 53820 IA OTTUMWA 15 15 50 332 74372 411142 915715 17119 305 0.1 29085 IA RED OAK 36 35 600 475 32182 412040 951521 30526 932 0.1 11265 IA SIOUX CITY 9 9 22.3 616 74480 423512 961357 44501 639 1.5 69 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 70 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 29096 IA SIOUX CITY 27 28 475 348 423053 961815 29270 353 0 39665 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 1000 611 423512 961319 45543 662 0 66170 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 873 609 423512 961318 44386 655 0 77451 IA SIOUX CITY 44 44 914 587 75037 423512 961318 37907 553 0.7 593 IA WATERLOO 7 7 3.2 527 74624 422402 915036 29923 770 1.7 81595 IA WATERLOO 22 22 80.9 198 74750 422453 920034 14283 453 0.2 29114 IA WATERLOO 32 35 250 584 421859 915131 35668 869 1 34858 ID BOISE 7 7 39.8 785 74994 434516 1160556 42508 556 0 62442 ID BOISE 4 21 725 858 66936 434521 1160554 35287 552 0 49760 ID BOISE 2 28 978 777 74847 434517 1160553 45215 558 0 35097 ID BOISE 39 39 50 534 74773 434423 1160815 10348 464 0 59363 ID CALDWELL 9 10 14 818 41421 434518 1160552 30230 551 0 62424 ID COEUR D'ALENE 26 45 50 465 74848 474354 1164347 14948 548 0 12284 ID FILER 19 18 50 161 74849 424347 1142452 13431 132 0 66258 ID IDAHO FALLS 8 8 63 463 74352 433003 1123936 42673 272 0 41238 ID IDAHO FALLS 20 20 50 223 74745 434544 1115730 14669 165 0 56028 ID IDAHO FALLS 3 36 200 457 28614 432951 1123950 22981 247 0 56032 ID LEWISTON 3 32 200 361 29292 462727 1170556 16016 133 0 62382 ID MOSCOW 12 12 129 340 464054 1165813 38149 264 18.5 28230 ID NAMPA 12 12 17 829 74980 434518 1160552 41343 555 0.2 59255 ID NAMPA 6 24 823 811 74850 434520 1160555 45069 558 0 86205 ID POCATELLO 15 15 251 327 74733 425150 1123110 16199 216 0 62430 ID POCATELLO 10 17 190 465 74851 433002 1123936 29893 260 0 1270 ID POCATELLO 6 23 505 452 28852 425515 1122044 24439 241 0 78910 ID POCATELLO 31 31 72.3 447 75065 425515 1122044 12855 207 0.1 81570 ID SUN VALLEY 5 32 1000 572 74711 432647 1141252 28884 161 0 35200 ID TWIN FALLS 11 11 16.4 323 74393 424348 1142452 27640 152 0 62427 ID TWIN FALLS 13 22 50 161 74852 424347 1142452 12892 124 0 1255 ID TWIN FALLS 35 34 21.7 152 66302 424342 1142443 7375 99 0 60539 IL AURORA 60 50 172 509 74684 415244 873808 23585 9162 1 5875 IL BLOOMINGTON 43 28 1000 293 403845 891045 30031 1013 0.2 4297 IL CARBONDALE 8 8 14.1 271 74549 380611 891440 25153 740 2.8 25684 IL CHAMPAIGN 15 41 895 396 400411 875445 33308 1072 4.8 70 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 71 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 42124 IL CHAMPAIGN 3 48 1000 287 74853 400623 882659 26770 809 0.6 18301 IL CHARLESTON 51 50 50 70 74854 392843 881021 9118 170 0 73226 IL CHICAGO 7 7 3.2 515 74590 415244 873810 29082 9389 0.7 9617 IL CHICAGO 2 11 1.18 497 415244 873808 22111 8967 2.2 72115 IL CHICAGO 9 19 645 453 39765 415244 873810 31624 9509 0.5 12279 IL CHICAGO 20 21 98.9 378 33366 415356 873723 20833 8983 0.1 71428 IL CHICAGO 26 27 160 510 45223 415244 873810 26141 9273 0.2 47905 IL CHICAGO 5 29 350 508 31269 415244 873810 32084 9517 0.2 22211 IL CHICAGO 32 31 690 475 415244 873810 37880 9711 0.1 10981 IL CHICAGO 38 43 200 509 38347 415244 873808 26028 9256 0.5 70119 IL CHICAGO 44 45 467 472 27856 415244 873810 28750 9402 0.2 10802 IL CHICAGO 11 47 300 465 33534 415244 873810 27544 9338 0.3 70852 IL DECATUR 17 18 350 375 29834 395707 884955 25571 913 0 16363 IL DECATUR 23 22 253 401 46084 395656 885012 25397 918 0 57221 IL EAST ST. LOUIS 46 47 187 345 74855 382318 902916 19175 2686 0 4689 IL FREEPORT 23 23 50 219 74557 421748 891015 14188 909 6.1 73999 IL HARRISBURG 3 34 1000 302 373650 885220 31461 703 0.1 70536 IL JACKSONVILLE 14 15 75 295 393609 900247 19431 508 1.2 12498 IL JOLIET 66 38 137 401 74605 415356 873723 19882 8980 0.2 998 IL LASALLE 35 10 16 403 28403 411651 885613 29068 2753 4.9 70537 IL MACOMB 22 21 75 131 402354 904355 13185 224 0.2 67786 IL MARION 27 17 800 213 41637 373326 890124 20778 529 0 5468 IL MOLINE 24 23 80 269 45050 411844 902245 16674 596 0.1 73319 IL MOLINE 8 38 1000 334 411844 902246 30696 927 13.3 40861 IL MOUNT VERNON 13 21 1000 242 68044 383253 892917 22609 2280 0.6 4301 IL OLNEY 16 19 61 284 385019 880747 18316 326 0 6866 IL PEORIA 19 19 52.7 160 74550 403911 893514 12050 556 0.8 24801 IL PEORIA 25 25 246 212 75203 403745 893252 17487 652 1.7 42121 IL PEORIA 31 30 1000 180 403806 893219 21448 755 0 52280 IL PEORIA 59 39 100 180 403834 893238 14564 599 0.1 28311 IL PEORIA 47 46 190 216 403744 893412 17264 655 0 54275 IL QUINCY 10 10 5.56 238 75059 395703 911954 21902 288 0.2 4593 IL QUINCY 16 32 50 302 74856 395818 911942 17825 236 0 71 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 72 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 71561 IL QUINCY 27 34 58.6 153 395841 911832 13012 184 1.4 13950 IL ROCK ISLAND 4 4 3.88 408 74670 413249 902835 33309 983 0 73940 IL ROCKFORD 13 13 5.07 216 75060 421750 891424 18953 1127 4.7 72945 IL ROCKFORD 17 16 196 201 421714 891015 18378 1234 0 52408 IL ROCKFORD 39 42 1000 149 40572 421726 890951 16199 1099 9.3 42116 IL SPRINGFIELD 49 13 5.08 183 74606 394727 893053 19340 553 0.2 25686 IL SPRINGFIELD 20 42 725 436 394815 892740 33981 1133 2.6 62009 IL SPRINGFIELD 55 44 335 416 394757 892646 28977 881 0 68939 IL URBANA 12 9 30 302 400218 884010 30142 1063 4.8 69544 IL URBANA 27 26 507 138 44738 401846 875500 15153 385 0 67787 IN ANGOLA 63 12 16.5 132 33342 412715 844810 17906 894 4.1 66536 IN BLOOMINGTON 30 14 224 221 43429 390831 862943 17415 1005 0 10253 IN BLOOMINGTON 63 27 165 310 392416 860837 22019 1993 0 68007 IN BLOOMINGTON 42 42 391 297 74640 392412 860850 23242 2054 0.1 56523 IN BLOOMINGTON 4 48 870 337 66628 392427 860852 22496 2099 1.9 74007 IN ELKHART 28 28 205 335 74671 413658 861138 20905 1383 4.6 67802 IN EVANSVILLE 9 9 30 285 74975 375901 871613 24887 793 1.4 24215 IN EVANSVILLE 25 25 50 301 74685 375157 873404 17964 632 0.4 3661 IN EVANSVILLE 7 28 1000 273 39643 380127 872143 24657 765 0 72041 IN EVANSVILLE 44 45 500 288 375317 873237 23639 730 0.2 13991 IN EVANSVILLE 14 46 250 310 375314 873107 22329 711 0 13960 IN FORT WAYNE 33 19 350 224 410539 851036 19961 1027 2.8 73905 IN FORT WAYNE 21 24 335 224 410607 851104 20232 1052 0.1 39270 IN FORT WAYNE 15 31 1000 242 66172 410538 851048 21871 1106 2 25040 IN FORT WAYNE 55 36 1000 241 29265 410633 851142 20604 1082 1 22108 IN FORT WAYNE 39 40 90 221 410613 851128 16043 835 0 49803 IN GARY 56 17 300 290 46333 412056 872402 17974 6919 0 48772 IN GARY 50 51 1000 523 30328 415244 873810 36200 9648 0 32334 IN HAMMOND 62 36 50 455 20094 415244 873810 13905 7988 0.2 39269 IN INDIANAPOLIS 8 9 19.5 284 395325 861220 25906 2472 3.7 70162 IN INDIANAPOLIS 13 13 13.1 265 74573 395543 861055 23955 2427 0.7 37102 IN INDIANAPOLIS 40 16 225 284 28275 395340 861221 19773 2154 0.4 41397 IN INDIANAPOLIS 20 21 200 236 33405 395359 861201 16842 1912 0.1 72 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 73 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 40877 IN INDIANAPOLIS 6 25 898 294 395358 861202 29472 2605 0.1 7908 IN INDIANAPOLIS 69 44 215 167 395320 861207 14297 1830 3.7 146 IN INDIANAPOLIS 59 45 700 285 395320 861207 24873 2432 1 56526 IN KOKOMO 29 29 624 285 75202 395320 861207 22949 2371 0.5 73204 IN LAFAYETTE 18 11 30 214 46110 402320 863646 25791 2000 2.1 28462 IN MARION 23 32 1000 271 33152 400856 855615 24181 2240 1.2 3646 IN MUNCIE 49 23 79.1 246 74591 400537 852332 17374 1494 0.1 67869 IN RICHMOND 43 39 500 281 17601 393044 843809 20965 3107 0.7 34167 IN SALEM 58 51 1000 390 43303 382100 855057 30937 1759 0.7 73983 IN SOUTH BEND 22 22 203 325 74481 413700 861301 24469 1519 2.1 41671 IN SOUTH BEND 34 35 50 333 413649 861120 18528 1202 1.3 41674 IN SOUTH BEND 16 42 695 299 413620 861246 26352 1633 0.8 36117 IN SOUTH BEND 46 48 300 295 30032 413543 860938 20015 1214 2.2 70655 IN TERRE HAUTE 10 10 14.2 293 74468 391436 872307 26489 743 2.4 20426 IN TERRE HAUTE 2 36 1000 290 391433 872329 28397 785 0.3 65247 IN TERRE HAUTE 38 39 1000 282 391355 872341 27325 762 0.3 4329 IN VINCENNES 22 22 50 174 74592 383906 872837 11671 268 0.5 65523 KS COLBY 4 17 1000 232 391509 1012109 26138 40 0 162115 KS COLBY 19 500 384 67184 391431 1012138 28456 43 0.6 79258 KS DODGE CITY 21 21 8.42 99 374933 1001040 8571 41 0 66414 KS ENSIGN 6 6 20 198 74340 373828 1002039 35374 155 0 72361 KS GARDEN CITY 11 11 7.4 244 74394 374640 1005208 23078 136 0 65535 KS GARDEN CITY 13 13 21.2 250 74415 373900 1004006 26607 139 0.6 66416 KS GOODLAND 10 10 34.7 285 74373 392810 1013319 29681 45 0 72359 KS GREAT BEND 2 22 1000 296 74857 382554 984618 30069 200 0 66415 KS HAYS 7 7 10.3 216 74434 385301 992015 23256 93 0 60675 KS HAYS 9 16 496 304 43521 384616 984416 26243 116 0.4 83181 KS HOISINGTON 14 14 50 163 74728 383754 985052 13887 84 0 33345 KS HUTCHINSON 8 8 9.28 244 75009 380321 974635 22260 672 4.1 66413 KS HUTCHINSON 12 12 18.5 463 74428 380340 974549 36561 822 0 77063 KS HUTCHINSON 36 35 1000 310 29560 375623 973042 22741 712 0 60683 KS LAKIN 3 8 35 149 64618 374940 1010635 20549 77 7.4 42636 KS LAWRENCE 38 41 551 291 74520 385842 943201 19399 1978 0 73 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 74 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 58552 KS PITTSBURG 7 7 4.2 340 74981 371315 944225 23837 455 0.4 83992 KS PITTSBURG 14 14 182 163 74729 371315 944222 14189 315 0 11912 KS SALINA 18 17 65 314 28829 390616 972315 15730 202 0 70938 KS TOPEKA 11 11 26 281 74458 390350 954549 22483 1047 0.2 63160 KS TOPEKA 13 13 18.1 421 75026 390019 960258 33558 674 0.4 67335 KS TOPEKA 27 27 50 320 74472 390534 954704 18654 485 0 49397 KS TOPEKA 49 49 123 451 75032 390134 955458 19858 519 0 65522 KS WICHITA 10 10 24.6 310 74441 374653 973108 30061 743 0.1 11911 KS WICHITA 24 26 350 303 43659 374640 973037 21248 704 0 72348 KS WICHITA 33 31 1000 345 374801 973129 31920 747 0.1 72358 KS WICHITA 3 45 891 312 374626 973051 28473 740 0.1 34171 KY ASHLAND 25 26 61.3 137 31365 382744 823712 11240 483 0.8 67798 KY ASHLAND 61 44 50 189 74858 382511 822406 9527 517 1.8 27696 KY BEATTYVILLE 65 7 28 322 373647 834018 29307 1000 0.8 4692 KY BOWLING GREEN 13 13 7.65 226 74498 370352 862607 20982 542 2.1 61217 KY BOWLING GREEN 40 16 600 224 43547 370210 861020 18291 424 1.5 71861 KY BOWLING GREEN 24 18 61 177 370349 862607 14430 362 0.9 34177 KY BOWLING GREEN 53 48 54.8 234 44491 370522 863805 13561 342 0.1 25173 KY CAMPBELLSVILLE 34 19 1000 370 32906 373151 852645 29990 2015 0.6 34204 KY COVINGTON 54 24 53.5 117 31523 390150 843023 10324 1949 2.2 64017 KY DANVILLE 56 4 26.5 327 64813 375251 841916 36898 1250 0.1 34181 KY ELIZABETHTOWN 23 43 61 178 31543 374055 855031 12210 840 0 37809 KY HARLAN 44 51 550 577 364800 832236 33564 1196 3.3 24915 KY HAZARD 57 12 50 398 371138 831052 32164 793 8 34196 KY HAZARD 35 16 53.2 369 31615 371135 831117 16906 377 2.2 24914 KY LEXINGTON 27 13 30 282 40363 380223 842410 23937 921 3 73203 KY LEXINGTON 18 39 475 288 67223 380203 842339 19658 838 3 51597 KY LEXINGTON 36 40 69.5 305 74859 380203 842339 17819 810 0.1 34207 KY LEXINGTON 46 42 48 252 31539 375245 841933 13467 735 0.3 73692 KY LOUISVILLE 21 8 27 200 45865 380159 854517 21952 1500 0.7 32327 KY LOUISVILLE 11 11 15.7 370 74625 382123 855052 27238 1613 0.3 21432 KY LOUISVILLE 15 17 60.3 237 17602 382201 854954 15178 1350 0 53939 KY LOUISVILLE 32 26 600 392 39847 382208 854948 29069 1687 0.1 74 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 75 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 34195 KY LOUISVILLE 68 38 61.6 218 64196 382201 854954 13653 1295 0 13989 KY LOUISVILLE 3 47 1000 392 42782 382208 854948 29283 1681 0.1 28476 KY LOUISVILLE 41 49 1000 390 29606 382100 855057 32130 1759 0.7 74592 KY MADISONVILLE 19 20 1000 216 372456 873130 23946 744 0.4 34212 KY MADISONVILLE 35 42 55.1 298 31621 371121 873049 15780 419 0.1 34202 KY MOREHEAD 38 15 51.4 289 31617 381038 832417 16277 340 0.3 23128 KY MOREHEAD 67 21 719 428 67075 375426 833801 30369 1018 1.5 34174 KY MURRAY 21 36 56.9 187 31619 364134 883211 12682 320 0.6 39738 KY NEWPORT 19 29 227 290 19124 390719 843252 17827 2366 12.3 34205 KY OWENSBORO 31 30 63.3 124 31660 375107 871944 11399 529 0 34211 KY OWENTON 52 44 49.7 214 31662 383131 844839 12714 763 2.4 51991 KY PADUCAH 6 32 906 492 371131 885853 40593 865 0.1 65758 KY PADUCAH 29 41 55.7 143 44512 370539 884020 11285 239 0.2 39561 KY PADUCAH 49 49 550 324 372342 885623 26296 631 0.3 34200 KY PIKEVILLE 22 24 50.4 423 32103 371706 823128 16779 419 0.6 34222 KY SOMERSET 29 14 53.3 429 31822 371003 844930 21530 541 0.2 38590 LA ALEXANDRIA 25 26 76 413 64838 313356 923250 20977 324 0 52907 LA ALEXANDRIA 31 31 50 333 75022 313354 923300 19032 273 0.1 51598 LA ALEXANDRIA 5 35 1000 485 74860 310215 922945 38196 921 2.1 16940 LA ALEXANDRIA 41 41 191 307 74775 305420 923717 16229 368 0 589 LA BATON ROUGE 9 9 0.36 509 70344 302158 911247 16013 847 1.1 38616 LA BATON ROUGE 2 13 30 515 36880 301749 911140 34334 1962 8 38586 LA BATON ROUGE 27 25 200 295 65435 302222 911216 19244 997 0 70021 LA BATON ROUGE 33 34 1000 522 32895 301934 911636 37256 1695 0.1 12520 LA BATON ROUGE 44 45 1000 424 29743 301935 911636 30315 1564 0 52046 LA COLUMBIA 11 11 17.8 572 74657 320319 921112 41125 677 0.3 83945 LA HAMMOND 42 1000 294 58980 295841 895626 25352 1754 0 35059 LA LAFAYETTE 10 10 17.2 507 74641 301919 921659 39312 1166 1.9 33261 LA LAFAYETTE 15 16 800 359 29847 302144 921253 29700 851 0 38588 LA LAFAYETTE 24 23 50 463 32658 301919 921658 21068 658 0 33471 LA LAFAYETTE 3 28 1000 507 301919 921659 42710 1354 0.3 13994 LA LAKE CHARLES 7 7 17 451 74972 302346 930003 36541 1017 0 38587 LA LAKE CHARLES 18 20 55 299 59155 302346 930003 16195 351 0 75 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 76 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 35852 LA LAKE CHARLES 29 30 1000 315 17585 301726 933435 25760 730 0 81507 LA MINDEN 21 21 1000 502 66613 324108 935600 36243 952 2.4 48975 LA MONROE 8 8 17 518 74345 321150 920414 39190 663 0.3 38589 LA MONROE 13 13 21.1 543 74429 321145 920410 38310 679 2.1 82476 LA NEW IBERIA 50 50 179 303 74784 302032 915832 17747 767 0 4149 LA NEW ORLEANS 8 8 14.7 302 75010 295714 895658 28567 1795 0 25090 LA NEW ORLEANS 12 11 70.8 306 67937 295713 895658 30008 1898 0 54280 LA NEW ORLEANS 38 15 360 309 69135 295857 895658 23729 1728 0 37106 LA NEW ORLEANS 20 21 300 254 41946 295511 900129 19099 1617 0 72119 LA NEW ORLEANS 26 26 1000 309 74381 295857 895658 27762 1834 0 18819 LA NEW ORLEANS 32 31 66.7 308 74861 295857 895709 15007 1456 0 74192 LA NEW ORLEANS 4 36 958 311 295422 900222 30245 1829 0 71357 LA NEW ORLEANS 6 43 1000 283 74862 295701 895728 28471 1791 0 21729 LA NEW ORLEANS 49 50 1000 272 44211 295511 900129 21583 1671 0 70482 LA SHREVEPORT 12 17 175 518 324028 935600 33403 943 1.5 38591 LA SHREVEPORT 24 25 50 326 74863 324041 935535 19407 591 0 35652 LA SHREVEPORT 3 28 1000 543 74864 324108 935600 42815 1075 1.7 12525 LA SHREVEPORT 33 34 1000 551 29201 323958 935559 38998 1012 0.1 73706 LA SHREVEPORT 45 44 500 505 32870 323957 935558 30463 888 0.1 13938 LA SLIDELL 54 24 1000 272 43616 295511 900129 24235 1729 0 3658 LA WEST MONROE 14 36 1000 570 320542 921034 43210 682 5 38584 LA WEST MONROE 39 38 1000 154 323021 920855 19639 356 0 74419 MA ADAMS 19 36 48 631 68110 423814 731008 20520 1724 7.7 72145 MA BOSTON 7 7 16.8 288 74565 421841 711300 26113 6966 0.2 72099 MA BOSTON 2 19 700 374 421837 711414 32268 7320 0.4 65684 MA BOSTON 5 20 625 390 421837 711414 30535 7199 2.1 25456 MA BOSTON 4 30 825 390 421837 711414 31736 7275 1.2 6463 MA BOSTON 25 31 1000 341 30342 421812 711308 26108 6911 3.2 7692 MA BOSTON 68 32 300 292 41971 421827 711327 19066 6343 2.3 73982 MA BOSTON 38 39 70.8 354 74865 421812 711308 19832 6586 1.1 72098 MA BOSTON 44 43 500 391 421837 711414 26942 7013 1.7 73238 MA CAMBRIDGE 56 41 550 345 46190 421812 711308 22716 6867 0.2 41436 MA LAWRENCE 62 18 1000 357 67714 421827 711327 28934 6962 2.1 76 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 77 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 60551 MA MARLBOROUGH 66 27 100 334 69136 422302 712937 17821 6431 0.4 3978 MA NEW BEDFORD 28 22 350 203 64975 414639 705541 17274 4604 0.9 22591 MA NEW BEDFORD 6 49 350 284 66255 415154 711715 19160 5455 0.6 23671 MA NORWELL 46 10 5 144 420038 710242 15414 5297 3.4 136751 MA PITTSFIELD 51 13 28 396 71986 423731 740038 9068 761 19.3 6868 MA SPRINGFIELD 22 11 10 268 65476 420505 724214 16915 2476 11.9 72096 MA SPRINGFIELD 57 22 50 306 74672 421430 723854 14145 2074 9.7 25682 MA SPRINGFIELD 40 40 380 324 70318 421430 723857 17575 2286 10.6 6476 MA VINEYARD HAVEN 58 40 300 153 42283 414120 702049 14774 973 3.7 30577 MA WORCESTER 27 29 200 453 422007 714254 24769 6977 8.9 18783 MA WORCESTER 48 47 365 217 40890 421827 711327 15283 5984 0 65942 MD ANNAPOLIS 22 42 350 265 74866 390036 763633 19332 6752 2.4 65696 MD BALTIMORE 11 11 6.91 312 74686 392005 763903 22401 6953 3.9 25455 MD BALTIMORE 13 13 21.4 312 70306 392005 763903 25622 7452 5 65944 MD BALTIMORE 67 29 50 250 74867 392701 764637 14260 5285 4.6 59442 MD BALTIMORE 2 38 775 305 74593 392005 763903 26023 7730 0.3 7933 MD BALTIMORE 54 40 845 373 46004 392010 763859 26825 7782 0.5 60552 MD BALTIMORE 24 41 200 313 66845 391715 764538 17292 6151 5.6 10758 MD BALTIMORE 45 46 550 373 46108 392010 763859 22879 7061 5.2 40626 MD FREDERICK 62 28 30 159 67466 391537 771844 7313 2448 34.6 25045 MD HAGERSTOWN 25 26 575 359 74627 393945 775754 22215 1362 28.7 10259 MD HAGERSTOWN 68 39 82.5 394 74528 395331 775802 13861 814 6 65943 MD HAGERSTOWN 31 44 209 359 33311 393904 775815 15728 977 4.1 40619 MD OAKLAND 36 36 71.7 291 75062 392414 791737 10542 216 6.8 71218 MD SALISBURY 16 21 635 279 64847 383017 753837 21695 659 0 40618 MD SALISBURY 28 28 76.7 157 74642 382309 753533 14077 426 0 16455 MD SALISBURY 47 47 225 292 75201 383006 754400 18171 579 0.3 39659 ME AUGUSTA 10 10 15.3 305 74406 440916 700037 25690 818 1.3 39644 ME BANGOR 2 2 2.37 199 74986 444410 684017 19580 334 0 3667 ME BANGOR 7 7 14.5 250 74374 444535 683401 24704 334 0.6 17005 ME BANGOR 5 19 465 402 74868 444213 690447 30384 488 1.1 39656 ME BIDDEFORD 26 45 50 231 41344 432500 704817 10502 659 5 39649 ME CALAIS 13 10 3.5 133 450145 671925 13040 29 3.4 77 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 78 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 48408 ME LEWISTON 35 35 57.8 258 74473 435106 701940 12534 593 0.3 39648 ME ORONO 12 9 15 375 40127 444211 690447 25072 442 5.5 73288 ME POLAND SPRING 8 8 21.3 586 74574 435044 704543 33555 1358 4.1 25683 ME PORTLAND 13 38 1000 491 28274 435528 702928 34527 1169 0 53065 ME PORTLAND 51 43 750 265 435106 701940 20484 732 12.4 39664 ME PORTLAND 6 44 1000 610 74869 435132 704240 34195 1315 1.3 48305 ME PRESQUE ISLE 8 8 3.2 107 74395 464344 680007 9352 44 0 39662 ME PRESQUE ISLE 10 10 16.4 332 74435 463305 674837 25597 66 0.6 83708 ME PRESQUE ISLE 47 47 50 86 75129 464512 681028 6607 39 0 84088 ME WATERVILLE 23 23 213 331 74754 440915 700037 18925 769 0 67048 MI ALPENA 11 11 19.8 202 74982 444211 833126 20697 131 1.9 9917 MI ALPENA 6 24 106 393 74658 450818 840945 24405 219 1.5 5800 MI ANN ARBOR 31 31 106 328 74499 422225 840410 18881 4073 7.1 16530 MI BAD AXE 35 15 200 309 433233 833937 23073 1204 6.1 10212 MI BATTLE CREEK 41 20 270 311 423415 852807 25083 2119 0.4 71871 MI BATTLE CREEK 43 44 212 305 424045 850357 20617 1951 2.6 41221 MI BAY CITY 5 22 1000 275 67337 432813 835035 26692 1509 4.2 82627 MI BAY CITY 46 46 50 306 74778 432826 835044 12942 965 0 26994 MI CADILLAC 9 9 20.1 497 74551 440812 852033 38645 826 0 9922 MI CADILLAC 27 17 338 393 60511 444453 850408 26844 392 0 25396 MI CADILLAC 33 47 500 393 67847 444453 850408 25466 378 0 76001 MI CALUMET 5 5 20.5 388 74362 462617 880258 37246 196 0 21254 MI CHEBOYGAN 4 35 78 168 58961 453901 842037 11815 82 0 73123 MI DETROIT 2 7 11.2 305 74673 422738 831250 24581 5551 2.5 51570 MI DETROIT 50 14 50 293 74870 422901 831844 18484 5122 0.1 74211 MI DETROIT 20 21 500 324 28693 422652 831023 25276 5606 2.8 10267 MI DETROIT 7 41 1000 305 74871 422815 831500 27189 5767 0.3 16817 MI DETROIT 56 43 200 318 422652 831023 22343 5247 0 72123 MI DETROIT 62 44 345 323 422653 831023 22661 5131 5.6 53114 MI DETROIT 4 45 973 281 19013 422858 831219 23734 5440 0.4 6104 MI EAST LANSING 23 40 50 296 74628 424208 842451 16787 1481 4.4 9630 MI ESCANABA 3 48 989 327 460805 865655 29896 159 0 21735 MI FLINT 12 12 13.7 287 74521 431348 840335 26522 2102 5.5 78 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 79 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 21737 MI FLINT 66 16 1000 287 28994 431318 840314 23878 2363 1.7 69273 MI FLINT 28 28 126 258 74594 425356 832741 17128 4320 0 36838 MI GRAND RAPIDS 8 7 30 288 424114 853034 28306 2299 4.5 24784 MI GRAND RAPIDS 35 11 50 238 64586 425735 855345 24319 1681 4.1 49713 MI GRAND RAPIDS 13 13 15.1 305 74541 431834 855444 27942 1392 0.1 68433 MI GRAND RAPIDS 17 19 725 306 43453 424115 853157 22480 1789 6.1 15498 MI IRON MOUNTAIN 8 8 3.2 190 74452 454910 880235 16892 112 2.6 59281 MI ISHPEMING 10 10 4.54 105 74721 462110 875115 11135 84 3.2 29706 MI JACKSON 18 34 130 299 39980 422513 843125 18640 1398 2.2 24783 MI KALAMAZOO 52 5 10 174 421823 853925 28093 2338 1 74195 MI KALAMAZOO 3 8 20 305 74333 423756 853216 28560 2341 1.4 11033 MI KALAMAZOO 64 45 50 319 74872 423352 852731 12174 1247 5.6 74420 MI LANSING 6 36 663 288 72523 424119 842235 25519 3046 2.3 74094 MI LANSING 47 38 1000 281 29954 422803 843906 20865 1458 0 36533 MI LANSING 53 51 900 300 59127 422513 843125 24069 1807 0.2 9913 MI MANISTEE 21 21 50 93 74674 440357 861958 9143 81 4.3 4318 MI MARQUETTE 13 13 15.7 332 74500 462109 875132 29278 183 0.1 81448 MI MARQUETTE 19 19 50 248 74742 463614 873715 12593 69 0 21259 MI MARQUETTE 6 35 83 262 67896 462011 875056 13760 93 0 455 MI MOUNT CLEMENS 38 39 1000 170 32831 423315 825315 16235 4698 1.2 9908 MI MOUNT PLEASANT 14 26 226 299 74643 434511 851240 22581 643 0 67781 MI MUSKEGON 54 24 280 281 40886 425725 855407 20561 1480 2.3 6863 MI ONONDAGA 10 10 11.6 299 74659 422633 843421 26535 2284 1.2 72052 MI SAGINAW 25 30 193 356 431301 834317 24557 2414 3.8 67792 MI SAGINAW 49 48 1000 287 40887 431318 840314 23991 2035 0.1 59279 MI SAULT STE. MARIE 8 8 24 288 74353 460308 840638 23547 98 0.1 26993 MI SAULT STE. MARIE 10 10 16.3 370 75038 460349 840608 30785 103 0.1 21253 MI TRAVERSE CITY 7 7 3.2 230 75044 444636 854102 14835 225 5.4 59280 MI TRAVERSE CITY 29 29 62.1 393 74491 444453 850408 19503 332 0 16528 MI UNIVERSITY CENTER 19 18 50 140 74873 433343 835854 13163 802 0 79 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 80 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 9632 MN ALEXANDRIA 7 7 15.6 341 74469 454103 950814 30286 438 0.1 35584 MN ALEXANDRIA 42 42 395 358 454159 951035 27590 404 0.3 71549 MN APPLETON 10 10 24.2 364 74492 451003 960002 29007 219 0.4 28510 MN AUSTIN 15 20 400 303 433834 923135 26035 497 0.1 18285 MN AUSTIN 6 36 500 295 433742 930912 25023 484 0.1 49578 MN BEMIDJI 9 9 15.4 329 74416 474203 942915 29401 114 2 83714 MN BEMIDJI 26 26 50 141 74758 472807 944923 12672 72 0 49579 MN BRAINERD 22 28 46.8 227 462521 942742 15201 153 0 82698 MN CHISHOLM 11 11 12.2 200 74723 475139 925646 22244 112 2.9 132606 MN CROOKSTON 16 105 220 38385 475838 963618 15345 124 0 17726 MN DULUTH 8 8 22.1 278 74529 464730 920721 25977 253 0.7 71338 MN DULUTH 10 10 19.4 268 74568 464715 920721 25154 252 0.2 35525 MN DULUTH 21 17 1000 299 464737 920703 30737 294 0.2 4691 MN DULUTH 3 33 1000 302 74874 464707 920715 26586 269 0 71336 MN HIBBING 13 13 3.9 211 74522 472253 925715 15849 116 0.2 159007 MN HIBBING 31 500 212 59939 472253 925715 16478 118 0 68853 MN MANKATO 12 12 17.4 291 74530 435613 942438 26737 345 1.9 68883 MN MINNEAPOLIS 9 9 17.9 435 74995 450330 930727 34544 3381 0.6 23079 MN MINNEAPOLIS 11 11 24 435 74511 450344 930821 36657 3438 0.1 36395 MN MINNEAPOLIS 23 22 1000 410 30005 450344 930821 33367 3310 0 11913 MN MINNEAPOLIS 29 29 1000 352 74442 450330 930727 29943 3302 0 9629 MN MINNEAPOLIS 4 32 1000 432 450344 930821 37736 3468 0 35843 MN MINNEAPOLIS 45 45 1000 430 75027 450345 930821 35610 3421 0 35585 MN REDWOOD FALLS 43 27 50 167 74875 442903 952927 10112 84 0 35678 MN ROCHESTER 10 10 16.8 381 74523 433415 922537 31210 565 0.9 35906 MN ROCHESTER 47 46 1000 343 28767 433834 923135 19950 424 0.7 35907 MN ST. CLOUD 41 40 1000 430 64438 452300 934230 30570 3263 0 68597 MN ST. PAUL 17 26 63.1 396 74396 450329 930727 19236 3053 0 68594 MN ST. PAUL 2 34 1000 399 74876 450330 930727 35080 3410 0.1 28010 MN ST. PAUL 5 35 755 433 450344 930821 35373 3407 0.1 55370 MN THIEF RIVER FALLS 10 10 9.7 113 74660 480119 962212 16952 121 0.3 9640 MN WALKER 12 12 14.3 283 74436 465603 942725 26947 214 1.5 80 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 81 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 71558 MN WORTHINGTON 20 15 200 290 33521 435352 955650 19967 290 0 592 MO CAPE GIRARDEAU 12 12 4.01 564 74661 372546 893014 32285 689 0.5 19593 MO CAPE GIRARDEAU 23 22 435 543 66965 372423 893344 31962 691 1 65583 MO COLUMBIA 8 8 8.1 242 74524 385316 921548 23056 473 0.1 63164 MO COLUMBIA 17 17 50 348 74453 384629 923322 20656 475 0 4690 MO HANNIBAL 7 7 13.6 271 75011 395822 911954 25163 309 0.1 41110 MO JEFFERSON CITY 13 12 15.1 308 384130 920544 27895 590 0.6 48521 MO JEFFERSON CITY 25 20 1000 293 29933 384215 920521 25334 533 0.2 51101 MO JOPLIN 26 25 55 280 370437 943215 17491 402 0 18283 MO JOPLIN 12 43 1000 284 370437 943215 26214 555 1.8 67766 MO JOPLIN 16 46 1000 213 370433 943316 21690 462 0.2 65686 MO KANSAS CITY 9 9 85 357 74967 390501 943057 34707 2334 0 53843 MO KANSAS CITY 19 18 55 355 390459 942849 21206 2033 0 41230 MO KANSAS CITY 5 24 1000 319 67335 390415 943457 29717 2259 0 64444 MO KANSAS CITY 29 31 1000 332 390501 943057 31070 2224 0.2 11291 MO KANSAS CITY 4 34 1000 344 74877 390420 943545 31289 2286 0.5 59444 MO KANSAS CITY 41 42 450 276 43791 385842 943201 21585 1987 0 33336 MO KANSAS CITY 62 47 1000 356 390526 942818 31520 2174 0 33337 MO KANSAS CITY 50 51 1000 339 390119 943049 30240 2158 0 21251 MO KIRKSVILLE 3 33 87 290 44120 403147 922629 15915 149 0 73998 MO POPLAR BLUFF 15 15 50 184 74417 364804 902706 11945 143 1.2 4326 MO SEDALIA 6 15 322 603 383736 925203 41150 733 0.1 28496 MO SPRINGFIELD 10 10 19.6 573 74595 371308 925656 41180 838 0.3 35630 MO SPRINGFIELD 33 19 1000 596 371308 925656 47590 935 0.1 51102 MO SPRINGFIELD 21 23 100 617 371011 925630 33195 715 0 3659 MO SPRINGFIELD 27 28 960 546 371308 925656 43501 881 0.3 36003 MO SPRINGFIELD 3 44 1000 622 74878 371011 925630 43618 863 2.4 20427 MO ST. JOSEPH 2 7 7.45 247 74608 394612 944753 22032 970 0.8 999 MO ST. JOSEPH 16 21 500 356 29942 390526 942819 27817 2121 0 48525 MO ST. LOUIS 24 14 1000 396 33092 382140 903254 32732 2820 0 70034 MO ST. LOUIS 4 24 540 335 74644 383147 901758 29120 2842 0 35417 MO ST. LOUIS 11 26 1000 288 383424 901930 29590 2841 0 56524 MO ST. LOUIS 30 31 1000 321 383450 901945 31023 2858 0 81 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 82 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 46981 MO ST. LOUIS 5 35 1000 332 74879 383405 901955 31112 2855 0.1 62182 MO ST. LOUIS 9 39 991 326 74880 382856 902353 29448 2832 0.1 35693 MO ST. LOUIS 2 43 1000 337 383207 902223 30697 2850 0 13995 MS BILOXI 13 13 14.1 366 74542 304323 890528 27980 951 4.8 43197 MS BILOXI 19 16 150 477 45861 304518 885644 25131 878 16.7 43170 MS BOONEVILLE 12 12 5.89 227 74629 344000 884505 20448 418 2.9 43184 MS BUDE 17 18 1000 341 312222 904504 34462 721 0 12477 MS COLUMBUS 4 35 1000 610 74881 334506 885240 44448 727 3.9 83735 MS COLUMBUS 43 81 204 43679 335031 884148 18843 412 2.6 25236 MS GREENVILLE 15 15 330 269 333926 904218 23434 322 0 43176 MS GREENWOOD 23 25 625 317 332234 903232 28909 387 3.6 43203 MS GREENWOOD 6 32 664 572 74612 332223 903225 41773 583 0.5 53517 MS GULFPORT 25 48 300 456 28507 304448 890330 26058 946 14.2 48668 MS HATTIESBURG 22 22 140 244 312420 891413 18687 353 0.1 60830 MS HOLLY SPRINGS 40 41 500 122 345920 894113 16048 1278 0.2 83310 MS HOUSTON 45 45 50 491 74777 334740 890516 23489 478 0 68542 MS JACKSON 3 7 7 393 74354 321249 902256 28290 725 0.2 48667 MS JACKSON 12 12 17.9 464 74596 321426 902415 34580 796 2.9 43168 MS JACKSON 29 20 400 482 321129 902422 36308 825 0.3 49712 MS JACKSON 16 21 1000 332 39758 321641 901740 28450 740 2.5 71326 MS JACKSON 40 41 1000 598 40781 321249 902256 40118 884 0.2 21250 MS LAUREL 7 28 79 128 42804 312712 891705 11063 251 0.3 136749 MS MAGEE 34 34 98.7 305 75071 320718 893239 19368 665 2.7 4686 MS MERIDIAN 11 11 6.15 165 75039 321938 884128 18166 254 2.3 73255 MS MERIDIAN 24 24 956 170 74996 321940 884131 18636 278 0.1 24314 MS MERIDIAN 30 31 1000 183 27899 321940 884131 18936 263 0.4 43169 MS MERIDIAN 14 44 880 369 320818 890536 31838 662 0 43192 MS MISSISSIPPI STATE 2 10 4.3 349 332114 890900 24659 370 0.3 16539 MS NATCHEZ 48 49 1000 313 38528 314008 914130 24377 340 0 43193 MS OXFORD 18 36 225 421 33510 341728 894221 23767 905 2.1 74148 MS TUPELO 9 8 9 542 74662 334740 890516 35700 634 3.2 84253 MS VICKSBURG 35 35 186 253 70324 321935 903703 14172 526 1 82 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 83 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 37732 MS WEST POINT 27 16 450 494 39741 334740 890516 33099 599 0.6 35694 MT BILLINGS 2 10 160 165 454600 1082727 29573 158 0.4 35724 MT BILLINGS 8 11 14.5 229 74882 454535 1082714 21580 152 0 5243 MT BILLINGS 6 18 1000 249 74883 454826 1082025 24590 153 0 43567 MT BOZEMAN 9 8 17.9 251 67316 454024 1105202 14163 84 0.3 33756 MT BOZEMAN 7 13 18.9 271 67232 454024 1105202 13989 84 0 35959 MT BUTTE 4 5 10.7 588 43752 460027 1122630 43135 183 0 18066 MT BUTTE 6 6 6.81 576 74501 460027 1122630 38275 174 0 14674 MT BUTTE 18 19 125 585 42948 460024 1122630 15884 65 0 81438 MT BUTTE 24 24 50 570 74755 460024 1122630 15762 67 0 24287 MT GLENDIVE 5 10 30 152 470315 1044045 20652 21 1.6 35567 MT GREAT FALLS 3 7 160 180 44451 473209 1111702 28365 93 0 34412 MT GREAT FALLS 5 8 28.6 180 473208 1111702 22360 91 0 81331 MT GREAT FALLS 26 26 50 65 74759 473223 1111706 8905 84 0 13792 MT GREAT FALLS 16 45 157 300 30029 473626 1112127 16946 90 0 47670 MT HARDIN 4 22 1000 323 74884 454429 1080819 28232 153 0 83689 MT HAVRE 9 9 3.2 389 74719 482032 1094341 22474 25 0 5290 MT HELENA 12 12 9.36 697 74375 464935 1114233 26663 152 0 68717 MT HELENA 10 29 43.4 697 68037 464935 1114233 14425 139 0 18079 MT KALISPELL 9 9 3.2 850 74531 480048 1142155 28217 110 0 84794 MT LEWISTOWN 13 13 3.2 636 74726 471046 1093205 25112 16 0.4 5237 MT MILES CITY 3 3 1.03 30 74367 462534 1055138 7580 11 0 35455 MT MISSOULA 8 7 28 623 470106 1140041 37525 171 0.2 66611 MT MISSOULA 11 11 3.2 631 74999 464809 1135821 18430 132 0 18084 MT MISSOULA 13 13 16.1 610 74552 470104 1140047 32125 164 0.2 81348 MT MISSOULA 17 17 50 628 74739 464808 1135819 16846 132 0 14675 MT MISSOULA 23 23 92.6 618 74525 470110 1140046 18786 150 0 56537 NC ASHEVILLE 13 13 29.8 853 70317 352532 824525 37759 2349 2.1 69300 NC ASHEVILLE 33 25 185 797 41130 352532 824525 22420 1439 5.7 70149 NC ASHEVILLE 62 45 1000 555 351320 823258 34527 2043 0.1 73152 NC BELMONT 46 47 1000 595 352144 810919 40397 3404 0.6 65074 NC BURLINGTON 16 14 95 213 361454 793921 16777 1712 1.1 69080 NC CHAPEL HILL 4 25 300 448 69110 355159 791000 26537 2744 0.4 83 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 84 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 10645 NC CHARLOTTE 42 11 2.2 363 351714 804145 20685 2180 3.7 32326 NC CHARLOTTE 36 22 791 577 64697 352049 811015 36939 3096 1.3 30826 NC CHARLOTTE 3 23 1000 565 352151 811113 43975 3599 0.1 49157 NC CHARLOTTE 18 27 1000 368 28621 351601 804405 30079 2748 6.1 74070 NC CHARLOTTE 9 34 1000 348 351541 804338 31482 2747 5.7 69292 NC COLUMBIA 2 20 1000 302 74885 355359 762052 31709 661 0 69124 NC CONCORD 58 44 149 422 74886 352130 803637 24190 2537 3.7 8617 NC DURHAM 11 11 19.2 607 74597 354005 783158 40971 2807 4.4 54963 NC DURHAM 28 28 225 610 354028 783140 36204 2685 1.5 21245 NC FAYETTEVILLE 62 36 1000 242 36997 345305 790429 20318 985 0.2 16517 NC FAYETTEVILLE 40 38 500 509 60837 353044 785841 33401 2898 0.6 50782 NC GOLDSBORO 17 17 244 628 70663 354029 783140 32343 2496 7 25544 NC GREENSBORO 48 33 700 575 38478 355203 794926 33109 2816 11.6 54452 NC GREENSBORO 61 43 105 527 42438 355202 794926 25142 2207 5.7 72064 NC GREENSBORO 2 51 1000 569 355213 795025 41290 3777 5.9 57838 NC GREENVILLE 9 10 35 575 352155 772338 45399 1370 15.8 35582 NC GREENVILLE 14 14 50 205 74443 352644 772208 15450 649 0 69149 NC GREENVILLE 25 23 71 331 42548 353310 773606 17438 801 0.1 81508 NC GREENVILLE 38 51 90.7 155 74769 352409 772510 13446 594 0.1 65919 NC HICKORY 14 40 600 182 67111 354359 811951 11030 776 19.1 72106 NC HIGH POINT 8 8 15 398 70590 354846 795029 29992 2769 3.7 69444 NC JACKSONVILLE 19 19 66.6 561 74418 350618 772015 23999 799 0.4 37971 NC JACKSONVILLE 35 34 600 199 41098 343110 772652 18502 568 0 12793 NC KANNAPOLIS 64 50 50 348 351541 804338 18157 2047 2.1 35385 NC LEXINGTON 20 19 800 576 355202 794926 44436 4287 2.1 69114 NC LINVILLE 17 17 61.6 546 74613 360347 815033 18558 1085 4.1 69416 NC LUMBERTON 31 31 109 319 69624 344750 790242 17329 889 3.6 76324 NC MANTEO 4 9 21.3 274 74336 363254 761116 29522 1725 0 37982 NC MOREHEAD CITY 8 8 9.88 216 74470 345301 763021 20774 299 0 18334 NC NEW BERN 12 12 20.5 591 75033 350618 772015 42035 1314 2.5 73205 NC RALEIGH 22 27 568 610 74663 354028 783140 41286 2847 2.8 8688 NC RALEIGH 5 48 916 629 69133 354029 783140 41654 2853 0 64611 NC RALEIGH 50 49 1000 614 354029 783140 44298 2980 0.1 84 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 85 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 69397 NC ROANOKE RAPIDS 36 36 50 368 74543 361728 775010 19141 604 8.4 20590 NC ROCKY MOUNT 47 15 180 354 36353 360611 781129 22787 1759 0.1 594 NC WASHINGTON 7 32 806 594 74887 352155 772338 44561 1497 1.1 69332 NC WILMINGTON 39 29 700 297 341916 781343 27800 786 2.2 72871 NC WILMINGTON 26 30 547 419 67959 340753 781117 27737 750 0.1 48666 NC WILMINGTON 6 44 575 280 59015 341916 781343 20378 591 0 12033 NC WILMINGTON 3 46 1000 594 74888 340751 781116 44363 1060 0 10133 NC WILSON 30 42 873 539 68096 354953 780850 32166 2162 2 414 NC WINSTON- SALEM 45 29 990 576 39890 355203 794926 37525 3484 4.7 53921 NC WINSTON- SALEM 12 31 815 572 362231 802226 37537 2625 4.2 69360 NC WINSTON- SALEM 26 32 263 504 74889 362234 802214 22283 1867 6.9 55686 ND BISMARCK 12 12 19.1 466 74459 463517 1004826 35655 127 0.3 22121 ND BISMARCK 17 16 1000 275 68012 463515 1004820 25005 113 0 53324 ND BISMARCK 3 22 97.3 392 18952 463523 1004802 21415 110 0 82611 ND BISMARCK 26 26 50 300 74760 463523 1004739 17826 104 0 41427 ND BISMARCK 5 31 1000 427 74890 463619 1004830 37254 130 0 22124 ND DEVILS LAKE 8 8 16.2 451 74687 480824 975938 35778 150 0 162016 ND DEVILS LAKE 25 134 245 66852 480347 992008 18194 39 0 41430 ND DICKINSON 7 7 11.3 223 74419 465649 1025917 22541 33 0 53329 ND DICKINSON 9 9 8.35 246 74437 464334 1025456 22539 36 0 55684 ND DICKINSON 2 19 50 217 59817 464335 1025457 13157 28 0 53315 ND ELLENDALE 19 20 72.3 163 64873 461756 985156 13632 18 0 53321 ND FARGO 13 13 11.4 344 74460 470048 971137 28996 257 0 55372 ND FARGO 15 19 1000 379 28940 464029 961340 27968 320 0.1 22129 ND FARGO 6 21 1000 356 470028 971202 34973 345 0 61961 ND FARGO 11 44 414 543 472032 971720 36736 325 0 53320 ND GRAND FORKS 2 15 50 408 74645 480818 975935 20362 116 0 86208 ND GRAND FORKS 27 27 50 96 74762 475745 970312 11054 108 0 55364 ND JAMESTOWN 7 7 17.3 107 74420 465527 984619 15835 39 2.2 41425 ND MINOT 10 10 4.75 207 74675 481256 1011905 19318 73 0.6 55685 ND MINOT 13 13 16.1 344 74570 480302 1012029 29701 89 0 22127 ND MINOT 14 14 60 216 480311 1012305 16113 70 0 82615 ND MINOT 24 24 50 239 74756 480314 1012603 15862 69 0 85 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 86 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 53313 ND MINOT 6 40 146 249 59853 480302 1012325 15514 70 0 55362 ND PEMBINA 12 12 28.7 413 74382 485944 972428 35647 43 0.1 49134 ND VALLEY CITY 4 38 1000 619 74891 471645 972018 46557 366 0 41429 ND WILLISTON 8 8 7.21 323 74598 480802 1035136 24857 38 0 55683 ND WILLISTON 11 14 50 257 59878 480830 1035334 14655 32 0.5 53318 ND WILLISTON 4 51 53.9 248 64823 480830 1035334 12463 31 0 47996 NE ALLIANCE 13 13 20.9 469 74471 415024 1030318 35161 90 0.2 47981 NE BASSETT 7 7 18.7 453 74383 422005 992901 35068 41 3.3 7894 NE GRAND ISLAND 11 11 15.2 308 74493 403520 984810 28363 219 0.3 27220 NE GRAND ISLAND 17 19 1000 186 28644 404344 983413 18605 195 0 48003 NE HASTINGS 5 5 2.8 218 74444 403856 982301 21865 205 0 47987 NE HASTINGS 29 28 200 366 39665 404620 980521 22084 179 0.1 21162 NE HAYES CENTER 6 18 1000 216 74892 403729 1010158 24515 76 0 21160 NE KEARNEY 13 36 753 338 74893 403928 985204 30484 227 0 47975 NE LEXINGTON 3 26 375 251 32442 402305 992730 19875 107 0 11264 NE LINCOLN 8 8 17.8 440 75015 405259 971820 35535 695 2.8 7890 NE LINCOLN 10 10 18.4 454 74987 404808 971046 36426 887 0.4 66589 NE LINCOLN 12 12 8.16 253 74553 410818 962719 23247 1145 0.1 84453 NE LINCOLN 51 51 200 461 74786 404738 971422 25974 454 0 72362 NE MCCOOK 8 12 10.4 218 394948 1004204 23270 48 0.3 47971 NE MERRIMAN 12 12 15.7 328 74407 424038 1014236 26596 27 1.2 47995 NE NORFOLK 19 19 53.8 348 74397 421415 971641 15893 214 5.9 49273 NE NORTH PLATTE 2 2 3.61 145 74454 411213 1004358 20245 59 0 47973 NE NORTH PLATTE 9 9 15.5 311 74398 410116 1010910 28103 66 0 23277 NE OMAHA 15 15 301 530 74532 410415 961330 37589 1264 0 47974 NE OMAHA 26 17 200 117 411528 960032 15002 836 0 53903 NE OMAHA 7 20 700 396 411832 960133 35092 1220 0 65528 NE OMAHA 6 22 1000 398 411840 960137 37205 1242 0 51491 NE OMAHA 42 43 360 574 410415 961330 36841 1261 0 35190 NE OMAHA 3 45 1000 426 411824 960136 35409 1221 0.3 17683 NE SCOTTSBLUFF 4 7 32 475 415028 1030427 37696 97 0.6 136747 NE SCOTTSBLUFF 16 17 91.5 238 74736 415023 1034935 14585 56 0.2 63182 NE SCOTTSBLUFF 10 29 1000 256 74894 415958 1033955 23681 74 1.4 86 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 87 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 21161 NE SUPERIOR 4 34 1000 344 74895 400513 975513 31844 185 0.1 48406 NH CONCORD 21 33 100 344 42932 431104 711912 16703 2327 3.5 14682 NH DERRY 50 35 7.3 191 424407 712331 9172 3874 1.5 69237 NH DURHAM 11 11 8.27 302 74664 431033 711229 23470 3392 0.8 69271 NH KEENE 52 49 50 329 74896 430200 722204 11793 404 5 69328 NH LITTLETON 49 48 50 390 74897 442114 714423 11253 131 0 73292 NH MANCHESTER 9 9 7.11 305 74688 425902 713524 20862 4589 2.6 51864 NH MERRIMACK 60 34 80 293 28154 425902 713520 13421 3094 4 9739 NJ ATLANTIC CITY 44 200 284 40339 394341 745039 13582 5320 11 23142 NJ ATLANTIC CITY 62 49 130 296 27898 393753 742112 15516 1908 0.2 7623 NJ BURLINGTON 48 27 225 335 33174 400236 751433 20486 7208 4.5 48481 NJ CAMDEN 23 22 197 266 394341 745039 20659 6862 0 73333 NJ LINDEN 47 36 832 408 42433 404454 735910 28648 19697 1.7 48477 NJ MONTCLAIR 50 51 200 238 405153 741203 16560 17216 0.3 48457 NJ NEW BRUNSWICK 58 8 20.2 212 32754 403717 743015 20825 17069 9.7 18795 NJ NEWARK 13 13 3.2 500 74696 404243 740049 25699 19255 1.5 60555 NJ NEWARK 68 41 235 321 69633 404522 735912 16835 17261 2.1 43952 NJ NEWTON 63 18 1000 250 67170 405153 741203 18520 17260 0 74215 NJ PATERSON 41 40 300 421 29858 404454 735910 23300 19037 0.4 74197 NJ SECAUCUS 9 38 136 500 74898 404243 740049 26502 19428 0.3 48465 NJ TRENTON 52 43 50 271 74899 401700 744120 14079 8751 11.3 60560 NJ VINELAND 65 29 225 396 72018 400230 751411 20528 7421 5.7 20818 NJ WEST MILFORD 66 29 200 167 33869 404718 741519 8221 13973 12.1 61111 NJ WILDWOOD 40 36 200 128 390728 744556 14738 739 0.9 53928 NM ALBUQUERQUE 7 7 27.6 1243 74445 351253 1062701 53948 961 0 48575 NM ALBUQUERQUE 13 13 7.03 1287 74399 351240 1062657 43540 925 0 1151 NM ALBUQUERQUE 32 17 65.6 1247 58949 351251 1062701 34322 913 0 57220 NM ALBUQUERQUE 14 22 303 376 74730 352444 1064332 16156 820 0 993 NM ALBUQUERQUE 23 24 200 1243 351254 1062702 47308 935 0 35313 NM ALBUQUERQUE 4 26 290 1262 351242 1062657 49465 939 0 55528 NM ALBUQUERQUE 5 35 250 1287 351249 1062701 46539 929 0 35084 NM ALBUQUERQUE 41 42 321 1262 351241 1062656 46959 928 0 55049 NM ALBUQUERQUE 50 45 245 1287 41944 351248 1062700 42560 921 0 87 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 88 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 53908 NM CARLSBAD 6 19 912 333 324738 1041229 32150 153 0.7 83707 NM CARLSBAD 25 25 50 134 74757 322609 1041114 11804 51 0 40450 NM CLOVIS 12 20 598 204 74900 341134 1031644 21451 87 0 53904 NM FARMINGTON 3 8 40 166 364017 1081352 23531 151 0 35321 NM FARMINGTON 12 12 12.7 102 74408 364143 1081314 13056 121 0 27431 NM HOBBS 29 29 67.4 159 74400 324328 1030546 13761 81 0 55516 NM LAS CRUCES 22 23 1000 223 44448 321722 1064149 21045 708 0 36916 NM LAS CRUCES 48 47 200 134 74901 320230 1062741 8205 693 0 18338 NM PORTALES 3 32 82.6 190 341508 1031420 15679 81 0 62272 NM ROSWELL 8 8 20.8 499 74533 332231 1034612 38887 159 0 48556 NM ROSWELL 10 10 24.3 610 74558 330320 1034912 43742 187 0.1 84157 NM ROSWELL 21 21 164 128 74747 330601 1041515 11510 77 0 53539 NM ROSWELL 27 27 50 115 74474 332458 1043359 7370 63 0 84215 NM SANTA FE 9 0.2 1241 67438 351245 1062658 20827 857 0.8 60793 NM SANTA FE 11 10 30 608 354648 1063133 38985 904 1.3 32311 NM SANTA FE 2 27 255 1278 351250 1062701 48245 934 0.2 76268 NM SANTA FE 19 29 245 1289 351244 1062657 47629 935 0 53911 NM SILVER CITY 10 10 3.2 485 74976 325146 1081428 22295 59 0.2 85114 NM SILVER CITY 6 12 3.2 502 74712 325149 1081427 16454 58 0 63845 NV ELKO 10 10 3.2 557 74973 404152 1155413 21628 36 0 86537 NV ELY 3 3 1 279 74709 391446 1145536 6317 8 0 86538 NV ELY 6 27 1000 270 74713 391553 1145335 13318 8 0 86201 NV GOLDFIELD 7 50 50 448 74716 380305 1171330 8739 3 0 35870 NV HENDERSON 5 9 86 385 360026 1150022 29838 1362 0.1 69677 NV LAS VEGAS 3 2 27.7 384 360030 1150020 41279 1419 0 35042 NV LAS VEGAS 8 7 30.1 609 355644 1150233 33021 1366 0 11683 NV LAS VEGAS 10 11 105 371 360027 1150024 30092 1360 0 74100 NV LAS VEGAS 13 13 16 606 74977 355643 1150232 27920 1363 0 67089 NV LAS VEGAS 15 16 1000 571 36067 355646 1150234 24277 1352 0 10179 NV LAS VEGAS 21 22 630 368 27967 360028 1150024 18202 1351 0 10195 NV LAS VEGAS 33 29 1000 383 30143 360028 1150024 18817 1350 0 41237 NV LAUGHLIN 34 32 1000 607 66737 353907 1141842 27047 1276 0.1 63768 NV PARADISE 39 40 200 357 360036 1150020 14586 1350 0 88 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 89 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 60307 NV RENO 4 7 16.1 879 391857 1195302 39300 677 3 63331 NV RENO 8 9 15.6 893 391849 1195300 38673 660 3.1 59139 NV RENO 2 13 16.1 876 391857 1195302 38571 678 0.3 10228 NV RENO 5 15 50 140 74902 393501 1194752 6245 389 0 19191 NV RENO 21 20 53 176 42485 393503 1194751 6065 363 0 51493 NV RENO 27 26 1000 894 28095 391847 1195259 36813 577 0.5 48360 NV RENO 11 44 1000 836 44000 393523 1195537 19310 403 0 86643 NV TONOPAH 9 9 3.2 448 74720 380305 1171330 12823 3 0 63846 NV WINNEMUCCA 7 7 3.2 650 74978 410041 1174559 23032 17 0 11970 NY ALBANY 23 7 10 434 423731 740038 26101 1488 1.1 73363 NY ALBANY 13 12 9.1 436 423731 740038 26438 1477 0.2 74422 NY ALBANY 10 26 1000 305 74903 423815 735954 20505 1313 0.8 13933 NY AMSTERDAM 55 50 450 207 38556 425904 741056 13763 993 0 2325 NY BATAVIA 51 23 445 279 74609 425342 780056 19868 2211 0.5 72623 NY BATH 14 14 50 318 74731 421828 771317 16473 511 6.7 23337 NY BINGHAMTON 12 7 20.4 342 420331 755706 27248 1001 1.8 62210 NY BINGHAMTON 40 8 3.2 375 74904 420322 755639 21411 803 0.9 11260 NY BINGHAMTON 34 34 450 263 70326 420339 755636 16714 635 2.2 74034 NY BINGHAMTON 46 42 50 408 420340 755645 17846 603 1.2 415 NY BUFFALO 29 14 1000 312 68007 430132 785543 18072 1356 0.7 71905 NY BUFFALO 23 32 1000 314 430148 785515 28788 1538 2.1 64547 NY BUFFALO 2 33 480 295 424307 783347 22868 1848 1.2 67784 NY BUFFALO 49 34 167 355 43011 424658 782728 13832 1332 2.2 54176 NY BUFFALO 7 38 358 433 423814 783712 29192 1988 0.3 7780 NY BUFFALO 4 39 790 417 423933 783733 32947 2280 0.1 71928 NY BUFFALO 17 43 156 330 74905 430148 785515 21439 1386 0.1 68851 NY CARTHAGE 7 7 15.6 203 74512 435715 754345 17022 191 7.9 78908 NY CORNING 30 30 50 319 420829 770439 16043 439 0.6 62219 NY CORNING 48 48 50 166 75045 420943 770215 9517 285 1 60653 NY ELMIRA 18 18 90 363 70327 420622 765217 16933 606 3.1 71508 NY ELMIRA 36 36 50 320 74631 420620 765217 15689 544 0.3 38336 NY GARDEN CITY 21 21 89.9 111 74455 404719 732709 10930 13638 0.1 34329 NY ITHACA 52 20 0.015 1 422546 762948 382 66 2.6 89 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 90 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 30303 NY JAMESTOWN 26 26 234 463 75000 422336 791344 22922 1548 0.2 74156 NY KINGSTON 48 950 378 65356 412918 735656 23706 14181 1.2 1328 NY NEW YORK 7 7 3.2 491 74571 404243 740049 26553 19368 0.9 73881 NY NEW YORK 11 11 5.89 448 74502 404243 740049 24100 19044 1.7 6048 NY NEW YORK 25 24 200 411 40002 404454 735910 23849 18957 0.9 47535 NY NEW YORK 4 28 164 515 74906 404243 740049 28665 19695 1 73356 NY NEW YORK 31 31 225 458 74482 404243 740049 20498 17944 5.8 9610 NY NEW YORK 2 33 239 482 74646 404243 740049 26765 19217 3.4 22206 NY NEW YORK 5 44 225 515 74907 404243 740049 27036 19135 3.6 57476 NY NORTH POLE 5 14 650 842 41544 443133 724854 38888 642 0 62137 NY NORWOOD 18 23 50 243 74908 442930 745129 15315 160 0.1 46755 NY PLATTSBURGH 57 38 100 737 66309 444143 735300 26048 413 0 67993 NY POUGHKEEPSIE 54 27 800 358 43683 412920 735653 23985 10805 34.2 73206 NY RIVERHEAD 55 47 410 196 72009 405350 725456 14328 4541 1 70041 NY ROCHESTER 10 10 5.9 152 74676 430807 773502 17449 1148 0 73371 NY ROCHESTER 13 13 5.83 152 74689 430807 773503 17099 1134 0.7 57274 NY ROCHESTER 21 16 180 130 68025 430807 773503 12874 1118 0.1 413 NY ROCHESTER 31 28 320 161 66841 430805 773507 13190 1127 0 73964 NY ROCHESTER 8 45 1000 152 74909 430807 773502 18539 1182 0.1 77515 NY SARANAC LAKE 40 40 50 440 74774 440935 742834 11926 38 1.7 73942 NY SCHENECTADY 6 6 4.46 426 74544 423731 740038 30424 1569 1.6 73263 NY SCHENECTADY 17 34 325 426 423731 740038 24147 1423 0.8 73264 NY SCHENECTADY 45 43 676 413 67289 423731 740038 24328 1401 0.8 60553 NY SMITHTOWN 67 23 150 204 39829 405323 725713 13643 4088 15.3 9088 NY SPRINGVILLE 67 7 15.5 411 74575 423814 783711 16571 1369 0.7 64352 NY SYRACUSE 56 15 78.2 379 74790 431818 760300 17835 1053 0.8 73113 NY SYRACUSE 9 17 105 402 44725 425642 760128 22102 1222 0.1 40758 NY SYRACUSE 68 19 621 445 29285 425250 761200 29954 1648 0.3 21252 NY SYRACUSE 3 24 210 405 74614 425642 760707 26452 1367 0.2 53734 NY SYRACUSE 24 25 97 393 425644 760707 22595 1276 0 58725 NY SYRACUSE 43 44 680 445 68111 425250 761200 27029 1402 0.1 74151 NY SYRACUSE 5 47 500 290 425718 760634 22529 1239 0 43424 NY UTICA 33 27 688 433 59327 430213 752641 25323 1081 0.7 90 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 91 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 60654 NY UTICA 2 29 708 402 45240 430609 745627 28423 1292 3.4 57837 NY UTICA 20 30 50 244 74910 430843 751035 11877 502 8 16747 NY WATERTOWN 50 21 25 331 44780 435247 754312 15745 186 0 62136 NY WATERTOWN 16 41 50 370 74911 435144 754340 18784 234 0.3 70491 OH AKRON 23 23 317 296 74690 410353 813459 21976 4065 0.2 72958 OH AKRON 55 30 1000 334 66037 412302 814144 16202 3445 0 49421 OH AKRON 49 50 180 305 410458 813802 18680 3641 6.7 49439 OH ALLIANCE 45 45 388 223 74576 405423 805439 15811 2304 0 50147 OH ATHENS 20 27 250 242 391852 820859 19485 708 1.9 6568 OH BOWLING GREEN 27 27 110 320 74647 410812 835424 21416 1313 0 50141 OH CAMBRIDGE 44 35 310 385 68039 400532 811719 24017 1218 1.1 67893 OH CANTON 17 39 200 292 410320 813538 20718 3970 1 43870 OH CANTON 67 47 1000 134 40562 410633 812010 15829 3690 0.1 21158 OH CHILLICOTHE 53 46 1000 328 33138 393520 830644 27403 2595 0.2 59438 OH CINCINNATI 9 10 15.4 305 75072 390731 842957 27101 3084 0.5 11289 OH CINCINNATI 12 12 15.6 305 75016 390658 843005 26101 3003 2.2 11204 OH CINCINNATI 64 33 500 337 39190 391201 843122 24978 3100 0 65666 OH CINCINNATI 48 34 500 326 32656 390727 843118 24471 3023 0.1 46979 OH CINCINNATI 5 35 1000 311 390727 843118 29790 3176 0.1 73150 OH CLEVELAND 8 8 15.7 305 75017 412147 814258 27942 3966 1.5 59441 OH CLEVELAND 5 15 1000 311 75073 412227 814306 31477 4147 3.2 73195 OH CLEVELAND 3 17 1000 296 72095 412310 814121 30737 4170 0 18753 OH CLEVELAND 25 26 100 313 42131 412028 814425 18860 3498 0.1 60556 OH CLEVELAND 61 34 525 334 40362 412258 814207 25232 3931 0.3 56549 OH COLUMBUS 6 13 59 286 39803 395614 830116 26569 2541 9.9 50781 OH COLUMBUS 4 14 902 264 395816 830140 28164 2467 0.4 71217 OH COLUMBUS 10 21 1000 279 395816 830140 28083 2497 2.6 74137 OH COLUMBUS 28 36 1000 271 395614 830116 25885 2312 1.6 66185 OH COLUMBUS 34 38 250 291 400933 825523 21605 2191 0.4 25067 OH DAYTON 16 16 126 320 74677 394316 841500 21274 3118 2.2 411 OH DAYTON 45 30 425 351 29247 394328 841518 22724 2886 7 41458 OH DAYTON 7 41 1000 290 67218 394402 841453 24360 3196 0.5 65690 OH DAYTON 2 50 1000 323 394307 841522 29230 3498 0.3 91 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 92 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 73155 OH DAYTON 22 51 138 351 394328 841518 21345 3050 1.9 37503 OH LIMA 35 8 30 165 36733 404454 840755 23276 1109 8.5 1222 OH LIMA 44 47 50 207 75074 404547 841059 14055 556 0.1 8532 OH LORAIN 43 28 200 337 38130 412245 814312 22230 3706 0 41893 OH MANSFIELD 68 12 13 180 68132 404550 823704 19292 1128 14.2 11118 OH NEWARK 51 24 1000 132 39194 400445 824141 18218 1935 0.2 25065 OH OXFORD 14 28 400 268 43343 390719 843252 20730 2781 0 65130 OH PORTSMOUTH 30 17 50 237 75075 384542 830341 16947 596 1.5 66190 OH PORTSMOUTH 42 43 50 382 384542 830341 19181 604 8.3 11027 OH SANDUSKY 52 42 50 236 75076 412348 824731 15066 834 0 39746 OH SHAKER HEIGHTS 19 10 3.5 304 19316 412315 814143 18681 3562 1.2 70138 OH SPRINGFIELD 26 26 50 291 74421 394328 841518 15181 2003 0.9 74122 OH STEUBENVILLE 9 9 8.82 261 74665 402033 803714 21161 2829 0.1 17076 OH TOLEDO 40 5 1 174 75077 414441 840106 11594 1129 13.3 13992 OH TOLEDO 11 11 13.1 263 74409 414022 832247 22585 2388 0.5 74150 OH TOLEDO 13 13 14.6 305 74430 414100 832449 22711 2547 3 66285 OH TOLEDO 30 29 50 314 75078 413927 832555 18428 2208 0 19190 OH TOLEDO 36 46 110 356 40304 413922 832641 18875 2041 0.8 73354 OH TOLEDO 24 49 59 409 42576 414003 832122 18182 1915 0 72062 OH YOUNGSTOWN 21 20 460 295 43442 410448 803825 23468 3296 0 4693 OH YOUNGSTOWN 33 36 50 148 410343 803807 12151 1299 3.1 73153 OH YOUNGSTOWN 27 41 700 418 410324 803844 29686 3817 26.3 61216 OH ZANESVILLE 18 40 620 169 395542 815907 18268 818 1.3 35666 OK ADA 10 26 1000 426 342134 963334 37746 516 1.1 1005 OK BARTLESVILLE 17 17 210 296 74384 363059 954611 20958 949 0 50194 OK CHEYENNE 12 8 30 303 353536 994002 30003 101 2.9 57431 OK CLAREMORE 35 36 79 256 75079 362405 953633 14124 888 0 50198 OK EUFAULA 3 31 1000 364 351101 952019 31355 600 0.1 35645 OK LAWTON 7 11 138 327 341255 984313 40212 446 1.6 78322 OK MUSKOGEE 19 20 245 252 72527 354508 954815 19870 1000 0.4 84225 OK NORMAN 46 46 50 416 74779 353552 972922 18773 1213 0 12508 OK OKLAHOMA CITY 5 7 34 430 41104 353345 972924 34028 1407 0.1 25382 OK OKLAHOMA CITY 9 9 19.4 465 74545 353258 972950 36596 1436 0.2 92 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 93 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 50205 OK OKLAHOMA CITY 13 13 26.4 465 74494 353552 972922 38935 1456 0 67999 OK OKLAHOMA CITY 14 15 500 358 353435 972909 29701 1365 1.1 35388 OK OKLAHOMA CITY 25 24 1000 476 44126 353258 972918 37403 1448 0 66222 OK OKLAHOMA CITY 4 27 790 489 353552 972922 39060 1449 0.7 50170 OK OKLAHOMA CITY 34 33 1000 458 353258 972918 39194 1464 0 50182 OK OKLAHOMA CITY 43 40 55.6 475 74566 353522 972903 23666 1272 0 2566 OK OKLAHOMA CITY 62 50 200 483 353552 972922 28774 1341 0 38214 OK OKLAHOMA CITY 52 51 1000 458 353552 972922 36936 1428 0 7078 OK OKMULGEE 44 28 1000 219 19049 355002 960728 20170 978 0.5 77480 OK SHAWNEE 30 29 1000 253 351658 972018 26283 1304 0 59439 OK TULSA 2 8 18.2 558 74648 360115 954032 40080 1293 0.2 35685 OK TULSA 8 10 6.9 542 42996 355808 953655 28865 1168 1.7 66195 OK TULSA 11 11 22.2 396 74534 360115 954032 33193 1211 0.3 11910 OK TULSA 23 22 1000 400 360136 954044 35807 1235 1 54420 OK TULSA 41 42 900 381 360136 954044 32275 1195 0.2 35434 OK TULSA 6 45 840 573 74632 360115 954032 40706 1297 0.7 37099 OK TULSA 47 47 50 460 75034 360115 954032 19212 1018 0 24485 OK TULSA 53 49 50 182 74912 360234 955711 13058 893 0 86532 OK WOODWARD 35 35 50 339 74767 361606 992656 16828 37 0 50588 OR BEND 3 11 160 226 440441 1211957 29073 157 0 55907 OR BEND 21 21 53.7 197 74422 440440 1211949 10195 150 0 49750 OR COOS BAY 11 11 3.2 188 74446 432326 1240746 12943 82 0 35183 OR COOS BAY 23 22 10 179 44658 432339 1240756 8368 65 0.9 50590 OR CORVALLIS 7 7 10.1 375 74546 443825 1231625 24451 1118 9.6 34406 OR EUGENE 9 9 12.1 502 75028 440657 1225957 24311 513 0.1 49766 OR EUGENE 13 13 30.9 407 74988 440007 1230653 28949 648 7.6 35189 OR EUGENE 16 17 70 473 44473 440657 1225957 17731 465 0.1 50591 OR EUGENE 28 29 100 403 60215 440007 1230653 15614 477 0 8322 OR EUGENE 34 31 88 372 67996 440004 1230645 13922 460 0 83306 OR GRANTS PASS 30 30 50 654 74763 422256 1231629 19481 185 0 8284 OR KLAMATH FALLS 2 13 9 659 420548 1213757 29481 84 0.2 60740 OR KLAMATH FALLS 31 29 50 691 74913 420550 1213759 19200 65 0 61335 OR KLAMATH FALLS 22 33 50 656 74914 420550 1213759 20779 67 0 93 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 94 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 50592 OR LA GRANDE 13 13 31.8 775 74341 451833 1174354 28988 78 3.1 81447 OR LA GRANDE 16 29 50 773 74737 451835 1174357 20192 42 0 8260 OR MEDFORD 5 5 6.35 823 74385 424149 1231339 49279 483 0 61350 OR MEDFORD 8 8 16.9 818 74567 424132 1231345 36640 386 1 22570 OR MEDFORD 10 10 11.5 1009 74513 420455 1224307 38336 337 0 60736 OR MEDFORD 12 12 16.9 823 74535 424132 1231346 35257 377 2.2 32958 OR MEDFORD 26 26 50 428 75001 421754 1224459 11117 216 0 12729 OR PENDLETON 11 11 22 472 74974 454451 1180211 30203 316 0 34874 OR PORTLAND 8 8 21.9 509 74577 453121 1224446 30424 2379 3.6 50589 OR PORTLAND 10 10 32 509 75002 453121 1224445 32672 2474 0.1 50633 OR PORTLAND 12 12 21.9 543 74483 453119 1224453 30824 2429 1.2 47707 OR PORTLAND 24 24 654 522 74572 453058 1224359 30708 2486 0 35380 OR PORTLAND 6 40 1000 523 453058 1224358 30516 2489 0 21649 OR PORTLAND 2 43 1000 524 453057 1224359 30145 2486 0 31437 OR ROSEBURG 36 18 50 213 34395 431409 1231916 9672 93 0 61551 OR ROSEBURG 4 19 50 274 28609 431408 1231918 9394 89 0 35187 OR ROSEBURG 46 45 12 109 44472 431222 1232156 5542 76 0 5801 OR SALEM 22 22 1000 490 74337 453121 1224445 31809 2507 0 10192 OR SALEM 32 33 750 523 453058 1224358 30072 2482 0.1 36989 PA ALLENTOWN 39 39 50 302 74699 403358 752606 15373 4857 2.5 39884 PA ALLENTOWN 69 46 500 314 59122 403352 752624 16535 6538 2.3 20287 PA ALTOONA 23 24 1000 311 29784 403406 782638 19812 757 0.8 23341 PA ALTOONA 10 32 1000 323 28867 403401 782630 24213 875 2.9 13929 PA ALTOONA 47 46 50 308 74915 403412 782626 13077 575 0.7 60850 PA BETHLEHEM 60 9 3.2 284 59326 403352 752624 15841 5342 8.4 66219 PA CLEARFIELD 3 15 810 413 59340 410720 782629 31830 862 1.4 24970 PA ERIE 12 12 8.63 305 74599 420352 800019 24260 675 0.6 49711 PA ERIE 35 16 200 279 30039 420215 800343 19713 636 0.6 19707 PA ERIE 66 22 850 276 65637 420233 800356 14972 581 0 65749 PA ERIE 24 24 523 310 70354 420225 800409 20313 702 1.1 53716 PA ERIE 54 50 200 271 67971 420234 800356 18066 531 3.5 13924 PA GREENSBURG 40 50 362 264 44438 402334 794654 16116 2634 2.7 72326 PA HARRISBURG 27 10 14 346 40451 401857 765702 22372 2185 0.6 94 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 95 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 72313 PA HARRISBURG 21 21 500 372 70325 402043 765209 22848 2357 4.6 73083 PA HARRISBURG 33 36 50 427 74916 402045 765206 16831 1972 8.6 73375 PA HAZLETON 56 45 546 488 411100 755210 27414 1940 16.2 69880 PA JEANNETTE 19 49 233 325 74484 401051 790946 16394 1872 22.4 20295 PA JOHNSTOWN 8 8 6.5 352 70335 401053 790905 20947 2534 0.8 73120 PA JOHNSTOWN 6 34 1000 386 65822 402217 785856 24699 1984 3 53930 PA LANCASTER 8 8 13.4 393 74678 400204 763708 23701 3313 2.5 23338 PA LANCASTER 15 23 500 381 41227 401545 762751 25174 3340 1.1 8616 PA PHILADELPHIA 6 6 2.55 332 75063 400239 751426 27704 9114 0.1 73879 PA PHILADELPHIA 17 17 237 354 74615 400230 751411 24810 8188 0 25453 PA PHILADELPHIA 3 26 770 375 400233 751433 31614 10075 1.6 12499 PA PHILADELPHIA 57 32 250 400 44229 400230 751411 22460 7852 3.7 63153 PA PHILADELPHIA 10 34 325 377 71122 400230 751411 27178 8934 1.6 28480 PA PHILADELPHIA 35 35 358 377 71123 400230 751411 25390 8573 4.3 51568 PA PHILADELPHIA 29 42 273 347 74917 400226 751420 22025 7599 8.5 41315 PA PITTSBURGH 13 13 6.42 210 74536 402646 795751 19434 2824 0.9 25454 PA PITTSBURGH 2 25 1000 311 402938 800109 29482 3587 0.1 41314 PA PITTSBURGH 16 38 64.1 215 74997 402646 795751 14493 2602 0.2 73907 PA PITTSBURGH 22 42 1000 315 43259 402943 800017 22392 3001 3.8 73875 PA PITTSBURGH 53 43 1000 303 45946 402943 800018 23931 3093 0 73910 PA PITTSBURGH 11 48 1000 289 402748 800016 24887 3241 0.6 65681 PA PITTSBURGH 4 51 1000 273 40377 401649 794811 20794 2868 0.6 55305 PA READING 51 25 900 395 67694 401952 754141 20953 5183 35.3 55350 PA RED LION 49 30 50 177 74918 395418 763500 11549 1960 17.1 17010 PA SCRANTON 22 13 30 471 411058 755226 32173 2482 5.9 64690 PA SCRANTON 64 32 528 354 59210 412606 754335 20233 1050 5.2 73374 PA SCRANTON 38 38 57.6 385 75018 412609 754345 15550 899 3.7 47929 PA SCRANTON 44 41 200 487 411055 755217 23373 1886 3.3 73318 PA SCRANTON 16 49 100 506 411100 755210 21416 1732 0.5 71225 PA WILKES- BARRE 28 11 30 471 411058 755226 32674 2527 5.1 52075 PA WILLIAMSPORT 53 29 50 222 74919 411157 770738 11458 308 2.1 10213 PA YORK 43 47 933 385 45937 400138 763600 22757 3271 27.5 50063 RI BLOCK ISLAND 69 17 1000 228 67093 412941 714706 21896 2966 4 95 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 96 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 73311 RI PROVIDENCE 64 12 11.5 295 74616 415214 711745 21856 5901 0.8 47404 RI PROVIDENCE 12 13 18 305 415236 711657 27993 6535 0.9 56092 RI PROVIDENCE 36 21 50 268 65226 415154 711715 11209 2916 34.3 50780 RI PROVIDENCE 10 51 1000 305 74926 415154 711715 27224 6489 0.4 61003 SC ALLENDALE 14 33 427 241 67765 331115 812350 15210 603 0 56548 SC ANDERSON 40 14 310 311 30073 343851 821613 22074 1365 0 61007 SC BEAUFORT 16 44 468 385 67764 324242 804054 19988 938 0 61005 SC CHARLESTON 7 7 12 562 70358 325528 794158 31487 849 0 416 SC CHARLESTON 24 24 283 583 74554 325624 794145 30857 818 0 21536 SC CHARLESTON 4 34 630 522 43263 325528 794158 32715 848 0 9015 SC CHARLESTON 36 36 50 583 74514 325624 794145 21692 657 0 71297 SC CHARLESTON 5 47 1000 521 45846 325528 794158 33547 866 0.3 10587 SC CHARLESTON 2 50 1000 581 66300 325624 794145 35154 925 0 60963 SC COLUMBIA 25 8 43.7 529 34078 340658 804551 40798 1724 9.5 13990 SC COLUMBIA 10 10 18.1 462 74559 340729 804523 32006 1450 1.8 37176 SC COLUMBIA 19 17 1000 500 43474 340549 804551 33236 1341 6.5 61013 SC COLUMBIA 35 32 65 314 340706 805613 18885 967 0.2 136750 SC COLUMBIA 47 47 50 192 74780 340238 805951 5835 584 16.7 19199 SC COLUMBIA 57 48 520 464 43955 340658 804551 27312 1158 1.4 61004 SC CONWAY 23 9 20 230 335658 790631 27745 778 0 66407 SC FLORENCE 13 13 18.3 541 74650 342204 791921 40668 1577 1 17012 SC FLORENCE 15 16 421 602 342153 791949 42129 1611 1.2 3133 SC FLORENCE 21 21 384 581 74438 342153 791949 32643 1311 0.1 61008 SC FLORENCE 33 45 50 238 341647 794435 14851 502 0.7 82494 SC GEORGETOWN 38 500 171 66448 335012 785111 14797 379 2 61010 SC GREENVILLE 29 9 65 378 64722 345629 822438 30492 1754 0.1 9064 SC GREENVILLE 16 16 98.4 337 74515 345626 822441 20685 1507 0.5 72300 SC GREENVILLE 21 21 496 744 70350 351056 824056 32127 1918 0.9 53905 SC GREENVILLE 4 36 664 577 74692 350643 823624 35642 2008 0.2 60931 SC GREENWOOD 38 18 50 231 342219 821004 15830 1013 0.8 27245 SC HARDEEVILLE 28 28 1000 455 75003 320245 812027 34454 819 0 9054 SC MYRTLE BEACH 43 18 1000 459 39594 341119 791100 36913 1343 0.9 83969 SC MYRTLE BEACH 32 32 204 299 75066 333937 790335 19240 418 0 96 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 97 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 61009 SC ROCK HILL 30 15 403 212 67767 345023 810107 15304 1610 0.2 20624 SC ROCK HILL 55 39 200 595 352144 810919 30125 2793 2.7 66391 SC SPARTANBURG 7 7 20.5 657 74611 351012 821727 40648 2745 0.4 61011 SC SPARTANBURG 49 43 50 302 345310 814916 16653 1264 4.1 61012 SC SUMTER 27 28 98.4 364 335251 801615 22690 1018 0.4 40902 SC SUMTER 63 39 500 391 66995 340658 804551 23915 1157 7.1 48659 SD ABERDEEN 9 9 19.4 427 74475 450632 975330 32920 127 2.8 61064 SD ABERDEEN 16 17 50 357 74927 452955 974035 21097 80 0 61067 SD BROOKINGS 8 8 9.16 230 70586 442016 971342 19513 123 4.1 61071 SD EAGLE BUTTE 13 13 21.9 518 74989 450320 1021540 37160 18 3 41975 SD FLORENCE 3 3 3.7 241 74334 445753 973450 25730 122 0 28501 SD HURON 12 12 11.8 217 74456 441139 981905 19995 64 1.5 17686 SD LEAD 11 10 34.8 576 441936 1035012 43992 162 0 34348 SD LEAD 5 29 1000 564 74928 441930 1035014 39408 160 1.3 61063 SD LOWRY 11 11 10.6 317 74386 451634 995903 27187 27 0.7 61062 SD MARTIN 8 8 12.9 265 74461 432606 1013314 24933 28 0 55375 SD MITCHELL 5 26 1000 315 434533 982444 31314 100 0 61066 SD PIERRE 10 10 21.4 488 74447 435755 993556 37734 62 1.3 48660 SD PIERRE 4 19 1000 378 74929 440307 1000503 35365 51 0 17688 SD RAPID CITY 3 2 7.1 185 39981 440407 1031503 21008 131 0 41969 SD RAPID CITY 15 16 150 154 68112 440413 1031501 14080 118 0 34347 SD RAPID CITY 7 18 946 204 74930 440400 1031501 21030 133 0 81464 SD RAPID CITY 21 21 50 211 74748 440533 1031453 14030 121 0 61068 SD RAPID CITY 9 26 76.3 202 74931 440307 1031436 13945 117 0 41964 SD RELIANCE 6 13 40 318 45870 435757 993611 27299 49 6.6 28521 SD SIOUX FALLS 17 7 65 126 29257 432920 964540 21044 318 2.5 41983 SD SIOUX FALLS 11 11 24.1 589 74495 433107 963205 41072 530 2 48658 SD SIOUX FALLS 13 13 22.7 610 75012 433107 963205 41131 542 6.5 60728 SD SIOUX FALLS 23 24 50 54 74932 433207 964434 8702 210 0 29121 SD SIOUX FALLS 36 36 152 209 75051 433019 963419 16927 287 0 55379 SD SIOUX FALLS 46 47 1000 608 433018 963322 43736 577 0 61072 SD VERMILLION 2 34 1000 232 74933 430300 964712 23159 447 0 22590 TN CHATTANOOGA 9 9 10.7 317 74516 350941 851903 21458 1022 4.4 97 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 98 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 54385 TN CHATTANOOGA 12 12 20.3 376 74582 350806 851925 25744 1171 1.8 59137 TN CHATTANOOGA 3 13 34.8 335 39987 350940 851851 22387 1068 3.3 65667 TN CHATTANOOGA 45 29 200 336 351226 851652 20169 974 1.1 71353 TN CHATTANOOGA 61 40 127 370 74934 351234 851639 14557 851 0.1 72060 TN CLEVELAND 53 42 500 333 67273 351234 851639 21132 1017 0.3 69479 TN COOKEVILLE 22 22 50 425 74600 361026 852037 20631 418 4.5 28468 TN COOKEVILLE 28 36 733 429 64292 361604 864744 28989 1833 0.5 72971 TN CROSSVILLE 20 20 189 719 75046 360633 842017 33281 1435 0.8 40761 TN GREENEVILLE 39 38 1000 795 59933 360124 824256 33197 1840 0.2 60820 TN HENDERSONVILLE 50 51 264 417 62261 361603 864744 23496 1687 1.5 68519 TN JACKSON 16 39 392 296 354722 890614 23937 609 0 65204 TN JACKSON 7 43 920 323 74935 353815 884132 29064 630 0.5 52628 TN JELLICO 54 23 18 608 29572 361153 841351 18076 1024 0.6 57826 TN JOHNSON CITY 11 11 23 692 74679 362555 820815 33619 1273 5.9 27504 TN KINGSPORT 19 19 167 699 75004 362552 820817 19914 813 2.5 83931 TN KNOXVILLE 7 55 382 66337 360036 835557 27701 1276 2.6 46984 TN KNOXVILLE 10 10 24.7 530 75019 360013 835635 32961 1395 3.2 18267 TN KNOXVILLE 15 17 100 551 355944 835723 25539 1228 0.5 71082 TN KNOXVILLE 6 26 930 529 360013 835635 34112 1440 1.6 35908 TN KNOXVILLE 8 30 398 551 355944 835723 29936 1352 0.8 19200 TN KNOXVILLE 43 34 460 529 360013 835634 29596 1344 0.2 7651 TN LEBANON 66 44 50 161 74936 360913 862246 9894 1179 0 71645 TN LEXINGTON 11 47 1000 195 74937 354212 883610 20726 465 0 19184 TN MEMPHIS 5 5 1.46 338 74601 351633 894638 25236 1416 0.3 85102 TN MEMPHIS 10 3.2 306 74651 350916 894920 18964 1299 0.2 12521 TN MEMPHIS 13 13 12.9 308 75055 351028 895041 26715 1453 0.6 81692 TN MEMPHIS 14 14 205 379 74732 352803 901127 19928 1414 0.1 11907 TN MEMPHIS 24 25 1000 340 351633 894638 32105 1643 1.3 66174 TN MEMPHIS 3 28 1000 305 74938 351052 894956 30162 1518 0.3 42061 TN MEMPHIS 10 29 835 320 350916 894920 30623 1534 0 68518 TN MEMPHIS 30 31 871 340 351633 894638 31598 1615 0.2 21726 TN MEMPHIS 50 51 1000 298 351241 894854 27410 1452 0.1 11117 TN MURFREESBORO 39 38 1000 250 32815 360458 862552 20770 1547 0.1 98 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 99 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 36504 TN NASHVILLE 5 5 4.28 425 74652 361605 864716 33893 1929 0.1 41398 TN NASHVILLE 8 8 17.6 411 74578 360250 864949 31980 1855 1.7 41232 TN NASHVILLE 4 10 39.7 434 74939 360827 865156 37842 2019 0.7 418 TN NASHVILLE 17 15 1000 411 39931 361550 864739 31670 1874 3 9971 TN NASHVILLE 30 21 1000 413 39919 361550 864739 31591 1916 0.9 73310 TN NASHVILLE 58 23 350 367 65623 361550 864739 25202 1708 0.1 73188 TN NASHVILLE 2 27 946 411 360250 864949 36057 2007 0.1 18252 TN SNEEDVILLE 2 41 445 567 362252 831049 30546 1678 1.1 81750 TN TAZEWELL 48 48 193 431 74781 361530 833743 16166 1003 0.3 62293 TX ABILENE 15 15 165 298 74734 321631 993523 18616 214 2.9 59988 TX ABILENE 32 24 1000 255 321638 993551 27043 267 0 306 TX ABILENE 9 29 1000 268 321706 994423 27325 239 0 60537 TX ALVIN 67 36 1000 579 43470 293415 953037 41745 4843 0 40446 TX AMARILLO 7 7 21.9 518 74462 352229 1015258 39378 350 0 1236 TX AMARILLO 2 8 5 519 352230 1015256 29273 314 5.6 51466 TX AMARILLO 10 10 20.8 466 74355 351734 1015042 37002 347 0.1 33722 TX AMARILLO 14 15 925 464 352033 1014921 40775 356 0.1 8523 TX AMARILLO 4 19 1000 403 351852 1015047 38007 350 0 68834 TX ARLINGTON 68 42 1000 368 60704 323525 965823 26621 5223 0.9 35649 TX AUSTIN 7 7 15.9 384 74653 301836 974733 31188 1835 0 35920 TX AUSTIN 36 21 700 396 301933 974758 34075 1894 1.9 8564 TX AUSTIN 18 22 700 358 301919 974812 33104 1897 0.1 35867 TX AUSTIN 24 33 1000 376 301918 974811 33409 1874 3 33691 TX AUSTIN 42 43 1000 395 60307 301918 974811 31315 1837 2.1 144 TX AUSTIN 54 49 500 396 28952 301933 974758 26233 1589 3.2 70492 TX BAYTOWN 57 41 1000 596 38691 293415 953037 40536 4831 0 10150 TX BEAUMONT 12 12 12.9 292 75047 301124 935315 27424 707 0 22589 TX BEAUMONT 6 21 50 254 44573 300824 935844 14995 489 0 12896 TX BEAUMONT 34 33 500 312 29808 301041 935426 23659 661 0 9754 TX BELTON 46 46 232 360 74537 305908 973751 22126 1398 5.6 42008 TX BIG SPRING 4 33 174 83 66027 321655 1012934 10867 96 0 125710 TX BLANCO 17 18 224 204 75128 294148 983045 16790 1769 0 83715 TX BORGER 31 700 306 66220 352033 1014920 23168 314 0 99 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 100 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 12523 TX BROWNSVILLE 23 24 1000 445 39305 260601 975020 35542 959 0 60384 TX BRYAN 28 28 50 220 75013 304118 962535 12801 270 0 6669 TX BRYAN 3 50 1000 477 43579 303316 960151 36945 2953 0 65301 TX COLLEGE STATION 15 12 3.2 119 74940 303748 962033 13045 278 4.9 58835 TX CONROE 49 32 1000 555 74342 293415 953037 38783 4814 0 28324 TX CONROE 55 42 1000 597 43288 293344 953035 39190 4840 0 10188 TX CORPUS CHRISTI 3 8 160 269 65123 273930 973604 36835 541 0.1 33079 TX CORPUS CHRISTI 10 10 14.3 287 74423 274650 973803 27676 539 0 25559 TX CORPUS CHRISTI 6 13 160 291 274428 973608 33940 547 1.3 58408 TX CORPUS CHRISTI 16 23 200 273 31667 273920 973355 18472 500 0 64877 TX CORPUS CHRISTI 28 27 1000 287 38420 274227 973759 26335 536 0 82910 TX CORPUS CHRISTI 38 38 50 280 74770 274522 973625 12804 476 0 72054 TX DALLAS 8 8 21.5 512 74356 323506 965841 39164 5431 0.5 49324 TX DALLAS 13 14 475 500 323443 965712 39475 5462 0 22201 TX DALLAS 33 32 780 537 36873 323235 965732 36512 5404 0 33770 TX DALLAS 4 35 1000 511 74941 323506 965841 41095 5492 0 17037 TX DALLAS 27 36 1000 495 29430 323236 965732 37393 5405 0.1 35994 TX DALLAS 39 40 1000 494 323507 965806 40034 5463 0.1 67910 TX DALLAS 58 45 1000 494 65026 323236 965732 33987 5352 0 73701 TX DECATUR 29 30 1000 544 65411 323519 965805 37279 5435 0 55762 TX DEL RIO 10 28 1000 100 292039 1005139 17248 56 0 49326 TX DENTON 2 43 1000 494 64993 323235 965732 33538 5346 0 32621 TX EAGLE PASS 16 18 50 85 36900 284332 1002835 17853 68 0 49832 TX EL PASO 7 7 38.1 574 74410 314818 1062858 43030 854 0 67760 TX EL PASO 9 9 24 582 74401 314818 1062857 39562 854 0 19117 TX EL PASO 13 13 24.4 265 74485 314715 1062847 22908 849 0 33716 TX EL PASO 14 15 1000 602 68879 314855 1062920 39112 857 0 33764 TX EL PASO 4 18 1000 475 74942 314746 1062857 35035 851 0 51708 TX EL PASO 26 25 1000 439 36510 314746 1062857 28858 851 0 10202 TX EL PASO 38 39 50 557 74943 314855 1062917 18504 851 0 68753 TX EL PASO 65 51 70 525 29633 314818 1062859 16890 846 0 81445 TX FARWELL 18 18 50 112 74740 342621 1031222 9122 77 0 29015 TX FORT WORTH 52 9 6.87 545 75052 323519 965805 25183 5229 1.5 100 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 101 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 23422 TX FORT WORTH 11 11 26.3 500 74431 323443 965712 38000 5412 1.3 51517 TX FORT WORTH 21 18 220 535 19052 323235 965732 28958 5279 0.4 49330 TX FORT WORTH 5 41 1000 514 74944 323515 965759 40533 5475 0 24316 TX FREDERICKSBURG 2 5 10.2 413 74707 300813 983635 38961 2966 0 24436 TX GALVESTON 22 23 247 566 291756 951411 35208 4479 2.3 64984 TX GALVESTON 47 48 1000 597 43454 293415 953037 39815 4836 0 35841 TX GARLAND 23 23 186 518 74983 323521 965812 33002 5332 0 42359 TX GREENVILLE 47 46 600 496 60867 323236 965732 30628 5313 0.1 34457 TX HARLINGEN 4 31 1000 368 44581 260856 974918 26278 949 0 12913 TX HARLINGEN 44 34 200 283 65860 261300 974648 18751 925 0 56079 TX HARLINGEN 60 38 1000 346 46306 260714 974918 25290 944 0 69269 TX HOUSTON 8 8 8.4 564 74357 293428 952937 33022 4777 0 34529 TX HOUSTON 11 11 17 570 293340 953004 38950 4822 0.5 35675 TX HOUSTON 13 13 22.2 588 70860 293427 952937 41752 4829 0.4 51569 TX HOUSTON 20 19 421 596 33045 293344 953035 36222 4827 0 12895 TX HOUSTON 14 24 900 579 59136 293415 953037 42319 4848 0 22204 TX HOUSTON 26 26 234 594 75005 293428 952937 31274 4768 0.1 53117 TX HOUSTON 2 35 1000 585 293406 952957 45364 4862 0 23394 TX HOUSTON 39 38 1000 582 33161 293406 952957 35952 4818 0 69531 TX HOUSTON 61 44 1000 461 68030 293344 953035 32739 4777 0 60534 TX IRVING 49 48 225 535 39591 323235 965732 27401 5245 0 55643 TX JACKSONVILLE 56 22 1000 459 33098 320340 951850 35608 924 0.8 31870 TX KATY 51 47 1000 597 69142 293415 953037 40037 4838 0 51518 TX KERRVILLE 35 32 1000 531 46137 293638 985333 33391 1818 0.2 148 TX KILLEEN 62 13 45 484 304334 975923 41034 1819 1.8 17433 TX LAKE DALLAS 55 39 57.3 494 74617 323236 965732 18912 5077 0.9 10061 TX LAREDO 8 8 33.3 285 74387 274021 993951 27256 199 5.9 33078 TX LAREDO 13 13 3.2 280 74376 273114 993119 17261 194 5.1 51479 TX LAREDO 27 19 200 49 36711 273004 993037 8202 193 0 35909 TX LLANO 14 27 660 249 304036 983359 22137 903 9.7 70917 TX LONGVIEW 51 31 1000 361 29517 321535 945702 29711 821 0.5 83913 TX LONGVIEW 38 38 191 268 74771 321536 945702 15446 554 0.3 27507 TX LUBBOCK 11 11 15 232 74358 333232 1015014 24165 371 0.6 101 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 102 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 53544 TX LUBBOCK 16 16 50 83 74990 333312 1014913 9323 283 0 40820 TX LUBBOCK 28 27 1000 253 333057 1015054 26380 374 0 55031 TX LUBBOCK 34 35 323 603 332412 1020648 38408 404 0 65355 TX LUBBOCK 5 39 890 143 32592 333455 1015325 14383 340 2 3660 TX LUBBOCK 13 40 1000 268 74945 333133 1015207 23286 358 0 68541 TX LUFKIN 9 9 10 204 74363 312509 944803 20490 309 4.7 69692 TX MCALLEN 48 49 1000 286 39111 260518 980344 23860 956 0 86263 TX MIDLAND 18 18 240 284 74741 315019 1023159 16457 276 0 35131 TX MIDLAND 2 26 1000 323 320511 1021710 32226 345 0 55644 TX NACOGDOCHES 19 18 640 457 315420 950505 35050 829 8.3 6865 TX ODESSA 7 7 7.53 226 75020 315150 1023441 23101 281 0 42007 TX ODESSA 9 9 25.7 391 74368 315917 1025241 34523 341 0 12524 TX ODESSA 24 23 600 333 39998 320551 1021721 26889 324 0 84410 TX ODESSA 30 30 50 212 74764 320551 1021721 11292 254 0 50044 TX ODESSA 36 38 500 82 315158 1022248 14075 267 0 53541 TX ODESSA 42 42 50 142 75023 320254 1021804 9745 254 0 61214 TX PORT ARTHUR 4 40 1000 360 300920 935910 32745 776 0 62354 TX RIO GRANDE CITY 40 20 50 113 74946 262547 984925 12057 225 0 53847 TX ROSENBERG 45 45 356 578 74579 293344 953035 33056 4793 0 31114 TX SAN ANGELO 8 11 18.8 442 74947 312201 1000248 33312 164 1.5 307 TX SAN ANGELO 3 16 1000 186 313722 1002614 23191 131 0 58560 TX SAN ANGELO 6 19 1000 277 74948 313521 1003100 27865 132 0.3 749 TX SAN ANTONIO 9 9 8.3 259 74347 291938 982117 21643 1787 0.4 53118 TX SAN ANTONIO 12 12 18.4 427 70242 291611 981531 32962 1888 0.7 27300 TX SAN ANTONIO 23 16 500 307 45032 291724 981520 24967 1830 0.2 56528 TX SAN ANTONIO 29 30 1000 441 28869 291728 981612 34435 1982 0 64969 TX SAN ANTONIO 60 38 1000 414 41078 291738 981530 29713 1891 0.2 26304 TX SAN ANTONIO 5 39 751 424 74634 291607 981555 34215 1903 0.1 35881 TX SAN ANTONIO 41 41 416 414 74547 291738 981530 25480 1848 0.2 69618 TX SAN ANTONIO 4 48 844 451 74680 291610 981555 34527 1894 1.3 35954 TX SHERMAN 12 12 14.4 543 74439 340158 964800 38337 946 13 77452 TX SNYDER 17 17 184 138 74359 324652 1005352 8618 45 0 308 TX SWEETWATER 12 20 561 427 74949 322448 1000625 31596 242 3 102 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 103 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 10245 TX TEMPLE 6 9 25 527 41595 311624 971314 34738 1265 6.8 35648 TX TEXARKANA 6 15 1000 543 325411 940020 46235 1101 0.2 68540 TX TYLER 7 7 15 302 74360 323223 951312 25525 762 0.4 61173 TX UVALDE 26 26 235 560 74761 293711 990257 31324 1771 1.6 35846 TX VICTORIA 19 11 18 290 285042 970733 24235 256 13.4 73101 TX VICTORIA 25 15 900 312 59285 285042 970733 29932 310 1.8 35903 TX WACO 10 10 13.8 552 75056 311919 971858 38053 1164 1.1 6673 TX WACO 34 20 1000 319 43597 311917 972040 27208 690 2.3 9781 TX WACO 25 26 1000 561 58939 312016 971836 38287 1343 2.2 12522 TX WACO 44 44 160 552 74667 311852 971937 22371 743 10 43328 TX WESLACO 5 13 57 445 38452 260602 975021 30650 948 1.5 7675 TX WICHITA FALLS 18 15 1000 325 39767 341205 984345 24386 379 3 6864 TX WICHITA FALLS 6 22 1000 311 74950 335404 983221 31667 399 0.1 65370 TX WICHITA FALLS 3 28 1000 305 335323 983330 30705 388 0 77719 TX WOLFFORTH 22 22 50 228 74751 333008 1015220 15411 312 0 59494 UT CEDAR CITY 4 14 1000 819 373229 1130404 45405 141 0 69694 UT LOGAN 12 12 22.3 690 74725 414703 1121355 32939 792 5.9 77512 UT OGDEN 24 24 450 1229 59860 403933 1121207 37197 1798 0 69582 UT OGDEN 9 36 200 1256 38687 403933 1121207 29628 1781 0 1136 UT OGDEN 30 48 200 1257 41318 403933 1121207 27529 1768 0 84277 UT PRICE 3 11 51.1 658 74335 394522 1105922 39854 210 0 57884 UT PROVO 16 29 530 1171 18846 403912 1121206 27532 1785 0 81451 UT PROVO 32 32 138 812 75067 401645 1115600 17405 1617 0 6823 UT PROVO 11 44 403 1257 403933 1121207 36321 1791 0 82576 UT RICHFIELD 19 0.33 441 46081 383804 1120333 4806 22 0 22215 UT SALT LAKE CITY 13 13 43.4 1234 74476 403932 1121208 38745 1812 0.4 10177 UT SALT LAKE CITY 20 20 73.3 1171 74746 403912 1121206 24439 1734 0 35823 UT SALT LAKE CITY 2 34 423 1267 39866 403933 1121207 34886 1796 0 6359 UT SALT LAKE CITY 5 38 546 1267 19903 403933 1121207 34973 1791 0 68889 UT SALT LAKE CITY 4 40 476 1256 27794 403933 1121207 33954 1790 0 69396 UT SALT LAKE CITY 7 42 239 1266 30673 403933 1121207 30198 1785 0 36607 UT SALT LAKE CITY 14 46 123 1181 75006 403912 1121206 27341 1761 0 35822 UT ST. GEORGE 12 9 3.2 43 44874 370348 1133423 4214 85 0.4 103 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 104 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 82585 UT ST. GEORGE 18 1.62 67 43602 370350 1133420 3637 81 0 83729 UT VERNAL 6 16 1000 676 74714 402122 1090841 36214 44 0 69532 VA ARLINGTON 14 15 900 173 29445 385624 770454 19793 6911 0.2 10897 VA ASHLAND 65 47 1000 249 28058 374431 771515 20211 1398 0.3 2455 VA BRISTOL 5 5 6.78 680 74477 362657 820631 44361 1840 0.3 363 VA CHARLOTTESVILLE 19 19 50 326 74743 375903 782852 14121 381 1.2 70309 VA CHARLOTTESVILLE 29 32 1000 368 67231 375902 782853 28649 1511 1.8 9990 VA CHARLOTTESVILLE 41 46 340 332 41219 375859 782902 16356 439 7.4 15507 VA DANVILLE 24 24 141 332 74560 370210 793230 21206 917 0 9999 VA FAIRFAX 56 24 50 215 74668 385228 771324 14900 5838 0.1 66378 VA FRONT ROYAL 42 21 50 400 32594 385736 781952 13538 714 16.9 10019 VA GOLDVEIN 30 160 229 383743 772621 17545 4650 0.5 37808 VA GRUNDY 68 49 1000 662 364947 820445 35033 1179 0.8 74167 VA HAMPTON 13 13 19.1 344 74561 364900 762806 31544 1937 1.1 25932 VA HAMPTON- NORFOLK 15 16 950 361 33525 364831 763013 33081 2003 0 4688 VA HARRISONBURG 3 49 65 638 383605 783757 15337 468 1.2 73988 VA LYNCHBURG 13 13 19.6 568 74507 371854 793806 34556 1169 1.1 24812 VA LYNCHBURG 21 20 400 500 39495 371914 793758 27157 971 3.5 74091 VA MANASSAS 66 34 1000 254 72356 385701 770447 10458 3141 34.3 5982 VA MARION 52 42 100 448 365407 813232 17079 494 1.1 40759 VA NORFOLK 33 33 905 361 74538 364831 763013 26943 1894 0 47401 VA NORFOLK 3 40 950 377 364831 763013 33295 2003 0 67077 VA NORFOLK 49 46 1000 360 19107 364831 763013 27594 1786 0.2 5985 VA NORTON 47 32 100 591 365353 823721 27184 974 0.1 74416 VA PETERSBURG 8 22 450 328 373045 773605 28598 1526 0 71127 VA PORTSMOUTH 10 31 1000 280 364914 763041 28778 1917 0 9762 VA PORTSMOUTH 27 50 800 264 364843 762745 23806 1762 0 30833 VA RICHMOND 12 12 5.41 241 74618 373023 773012 21454 1278 2.3 57832 VA RICHMOND 6 25 410 347 373045 773605 28828 1531 0 412 VA RICHMOND 35 26 800 328 373045 773605 30742 1594 1.4 9987 VA RICHMOND 23 42 160 346 373045 773604 22009 1323 2.3 9989 VA RICHMOND 57 44 100 328 373045 773605 20348 1242 0 5981 VA ROANOKE 15 3 7.25 618 39733 371146 800917 41928 1430 2.6 104 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 105 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 24813 VA ROANOKE 27 17 400 594 29905 371146 800916 28254 1105 5.2 71329 VA ROANOKE 7 18 605 610 74951 371142 800922 37968 1316 1.3 57840 VA ROANOKE 10 30 774 610 74952 371202 800855 34047 1227 3.5 70251 VA ROANOKE 38 36 700 623 27852 371137 800925 28663 1055 1.3 60111 VA STAUNTON 51 11 3.2 680 31834 380954 791851 19643 552 5.6 82574 VA VIRGINIA BEACH 21 7 4.86 310 75265 364831 763012 19356 1714 0.1 65387 VA VIRGINIA BEACH 43 29 1000 241 30040 364914 763041 21875 1737 0 11259 VT BURLINGTON 22 13 10 852 60531 443133 724858 32376 586 0.4 46728 VT BURLINGTON 3 22 435 839 75057 443132 724858 41959 619 0.4 69944 VT BURLINGTON 33 32 200 826 443132 724851 34750 567 0 10132 VT BURLINGTON 44 43 50 840 74954 443132 724854 25229 485 0.9 73344 VT HARTFORD 31 25 117 651 43680 432615 722708 21854 616 0.3 69946 VT RUTLAND 28 9 15 385 67939 433931 730625 21748 544 2.8 69940 VT ST. JOHNSBURY 20 18 200 592 443416 715339 26170 300 1.2 69943 VT WINDSOR 41 24 200 693 432614 722707 30196 1185 0.3 56852 WA BELLEVUE 33 33 179 717 74496 473017 1215806 26632 3571 0.1 4624 WA BELLEVUE 51 50 240 719 17552 473017 1215804 28362 3664 0 53586 WA BELLINGHAM 24 19 165 757 43180 484046 1225031 33673 982 7.4 35862 WA BELLINGHAM 12 35 612 722 74955 484040 1224948 43278 1644 0 62468 WA CENTRALIA 15 19 43.7 334 463316 1230326 13904 489 22.8 35396 WA EVERETT 16 31 700 218 44001 473755 1222059 18375 3525 0 2495 WA KENNEWICK 42 44 160 390 460611 1190754 23073 373 0 56029 WA PASCO 19 18 50 366 74956 460551 1191130 20149 362 0 71024 WA PULLMAN 10 10 6.2 408 74411 465143 1171026 25722 259 0 78921 WA PULLMAN 24 24 1000 569 66879 473444 1171746 32886 657 0 12427 WA RICHLAND 25 26 200 411 460612 1190749 26245 384 0 71023 WA RICHLAND 31 38 47.6 361 60199 460612 1190740 11914 290 0 33749 WA SEATTLE 9 9 7.49 252 74562 473658 1221828 21801 3579 0 69571 WA SEATTLE 22 25 1000 290 473657 1221826 27243 3646 0 21656 WA SEATTLE 4 38 1000 247 74957 473755 1222109 22159 3592 0.1 66781 WA SEATTLE 7 39 1000 230 65845 473801 1222120 19081 3534 0.1 49264 WA SEATTLE 45 44 240 714 38740 473017 1215806 25492 3632 0 34847 WA SEATTLE 5 48 960 239 18954 473755 1222059 18736 3562 0 105 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 106 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 34537 WA SPOKANE 6 7 45.1 653 74388 473452 1171747 45047 684 0.1 61956 WA SPOKANE 7 8 21.6 558 473434 1171758 36062 666 0.2 61978 WA SPOKANE 4 13 23.3 936 475518 1170648 46003 654 0.3 34868 WA SPOKANE 2 20 893 641 64696 473541 1171753 37651 663 0 58684 WA SPOKANE 28 28 91.4 601 74486 473444 1171746 26401 586 0 81694 WA SPOKANE 34 34 104 450 74766 473604 1171753 17181 537 0 35606 WA SPOKANE 22 36 250 622 64693 473541 1171753 20760 538 0 23428 WA TACOMA 11 11 12.6 276 74526 473655 1221828 20515 3560 0 33894 WA TACOMA 13 13 22.7 585 74424 473253 1224822 32350 3783 0 67950 WA TACOMA 20 14 90 473 39524 473250 1224740 22129 3629 0 62469 WA TACOMA 28 27 47.2 224 471641 1223042 13991 3136 0 35419 WA TACOMA 56 42 144 695 473017 1215806 29896 3638 0 35460 WA VANCOUVER 49 30 741 528 453119 1224453 29877 2443 1.4 84238 WA WALLA WALLA 9 9 45 432 460558 1190740 38298 459 0.1 2506 WA YAKIMA 35 14 160 293 463157 1203037 15036 248 0.1 12395 WA YAKIMA 23 16 200 266 463159 1203026 14954 247 0 33752 WA YAKIMA 47 21 50 280 463158 1203033 11735 236 0 56033 WA YAKIMA 29 33 50 296 74958 463158 1203033 10953 235 0 86496 WI ANTIGO 46 50 286 38603 450322 892754 11094 243 0.1 361 WI APPLETON 32 27 50 336 74693 442130 875848 19462 961 0 2709 WI CHIPPEWA FALLS 48 49 1000 203 445724 914003 20780 395 0 81503 WI CRANDON 4 12 3.2 119 74710 453423 885257 11762 86 0.4 77789 WI EAGLE RIVER 34 28 70 144 67695 454630 891455 12379 92 0.2 7893 WI EAU CLAIRE 13 13 22.9 607 74548 443951 905741 43063 860 1.7 64550 WI EAU CLAIRE 18 15 200 280 67697 444800 912757 19543 336 0.2 60571 WI FOND DU LAC 68 44 700 195 66227 432620 883129 18054 2137 0.1 4150 WI GREEN BAY 11 11 17.2 384 75053 442431 875929 31619 1089 2.6 74417 WI GREEN BAY 2 23 1000 372 442435 880005 35477 1151 0.7 9635 WI GREEN BAY 5 39 738 364 74654 442001 875856 27692 1085 1 2708 WI GREEN BAY 26 41 1000 321 27828 442130 875848 26965 1084 0.8 18798 WI GREEN BAY 38 42 200 375 442434 880006 25059 1041 0.5 26025 WI JANESVILLE 57 32 200 387 65253 430303 892913 25102 1265 0.3 37104 WI KENOSHA 55 40 830 358 43896 430544 875417 26779 2949 0.3 106 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 107 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 74424 WI LA CROSSE 8 8 20.3 462 74563 440528 912016 35258 713 2.5 64549 WI LA CROSSE 19 14 250 327 434823 912202 25195 419 0.8 2710 WI LA CROSSE 25 17 450 349 29449 434815 912220 25884 487 0.7 18780 WI LA CROSSE 31 30 308 351 434817 912206 25909 420 0 10221 WI MADISON 47 11 15 471 30020 430321 893206 28968 1508 6 6870 WI MADISON 15 19 56 387 430303 892913 21196 1026 3.9 6096 WI MADISON 21 20 100 453 430321 893206 26579 1250 1.2 64545 WI MADISON 27 26 400 455 33126 430321 893206 30128 1450 1.3 65143 WI MADISON 3 50 603 466 430321 893206 32793 1639 2.5 68547 WI MAYVILLE 52 43 300 186 432611 883134 16768 1878 7.9 18793 WI MENOMONIE 28 27 291 350 450249 915147 26276 743 13.7 42663 WI MILWAUKEE 10 8 25 354 67092 430546 875415 29509 3035 1.4 74174 WI MILWAUKEE 18 18 368 302 74698 430544 875417 22781 2496 3.6 72342 WI MILWAUKEE 30 22 196 297 42943 430544 875417 19180 2440 1.3 71278 WI MILWAUKEE 24 25 625 340 41342 430544 875417 26207 2873 1.1 74098 WI MILWAUKEE 4 28 1000 305 74959 430529 875407 30594 2856 4.5 73107 WI MILWAUKEE 6 33 1000 305 74960 430524 875347 30009 2916 0.6 65680 WI MILWAUKEE 12 34 863 263 59757 430642 875542 23265 2660 0 42665 WI MILWAUKEE 36 35 500 355 66933 430546 875415 25395 2769 0.1 71427 WI MILWAUKEE 58 46 1000 322 32644 430642 875550 27046 2827 1.9 63046 WI PARK FALLS 36 36 50 445 74583 455643 901628 22223 139 0 68545 WI RACINE 49 48 176 303 74961 430515 875401 17104 2279 0.1 49699 WI RHINELANDER 12 16 538 489 28605 454003 891229 38587 375 0 33658 WI SUPERIOR 6 19 433 315 464721 920651 45444 386 0 73042 WI SURING 14 21 450 332 43297 442001 875856 20367 938 0.2 6867 WI WAUSAU 7 7 16.9 369 74555 445514 894131 31741 531 0.1 64546 WI WAUSAU 9 9 17 369 75014 445514 894131 31158 526 0.8 73036 WI WAUSAU 20 24 200 387 445514 894128 27234 487 0.3 86204 WI WITTENBERG 55 50 160 327 74788 450322 892754 18272 378 1.2 37806 WV BLUEFIELD 40 40 1000 386 74377 371308 811539 24131 705 1.2 74176 WV BLUEFIELD 6 46 1000 361 371521 811055 24972 695 0.3 417 WV CHARLESTON 11 19 475 514 382428 815413 37278 1306 0.6 73189 WV CHARLESTON 29 39 1000 350 40580 382812 814635 25868 924 2 107 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 108 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 71280 WV CHARLESTON 8 41 475 514 382428 815413 33607 1168 3.1 10976 WV CLARKSBURG 46 10 30 235 44599 391802 802037 22787 589 0.9 71220 WV CLARKSBURG 12 12 6.55 262 74602 391706 801946 20742 524 1 71680 WV GRANDVIEW 9 10 2.5 314 74706 375346 805921 16544 435 7.6 23342 WV HUNTINGTON 13 13 16 396 70338 383021 821233 27898 1025 4.7 36912 WV HUNTINGTON 3 23 724 402 383036 821310 33731 1182 0.6 71657 WV HUNTINGTON 33 34 63.1 379 74962 382941 821203 16566 734 1.4 74169 WV LEWISBURG 59 8 3.68 577 374622 804225 26153 590 1.7 23264 WV MARTINSBURG 60 12 23 314 392727 780352 24965 2481 6.2 71676 WV MORGANTOWN 24 33 145 457 74963 394145 794545 20788 1370 0.5 66804 WV OAK HILL 4 4 2.73 236 75048 375726 810903 20811 580 3 4685 WV PARKERSBURG 15 49 47.4 193 392059 813356 12809 348 2.1 70592 WV WESTON 5 5 9.96 253 74344 390429 802528 27488 569 0.4 6869 WV WHEELING 7 7 15.5 293 74497 400341 804508 25673 2373 0.1 82575 WY CASPER 6 6 1 536 74715 424426 1062134 20136 70 0 68713 WY CASPER 13 12 3.2 534 74727 424426 1062134 18050 70 0 63177 WY CASPER 14 14 53.3 573 74389 424426 1062134 25030 70 0 18286 WY CASPER 2 17 741 588 424403 1062000 40682 80 0.1 74256 WY CASPER 20 20 52.4 582 74425 424437 1061831 21652 70 0 18287 WY CHEYENNE 33 11 16 650 67257 403247 1051150 28369 2763 0 40250 WY CHEYENNE 27 27 169 232 74478 410255 1045328 13499 438 0 63166 WY CHEYENNE 5 30 630 189 410601 1050023 18799 415 2.9 1283 WY JACKSON 2 2 1 293 74378 432742 1104510 17622 31 0 35103 WY JACKSON 11 11 3.2 327 74724 432742 1104510 10697 22 0 63162 WY LANDER 5 7 31.7 82 74964 425343 1084334 15754 32 2.8 10036 WY LANDER 4 8 60 463 74965 423459 1084236 36626 35 0.6 10032 WY LARAMIE 8 8 3.2 318 74718 411717 1052642 12970 109 0.1 21612 WY RAWLINS 11 9 3.2 70 74966 414615 1071425 9432 11 0 21613 WY RIVERTON 10 10 13.9 526 74402 432726 1081202 26119 49 0.2 63170 WY ROCK SPRINGS 13 13 14.2 495 74448 412621 1090642 33006 43 0 81191 WY SHERIDAN 7 7 3.2 349 74717 443720 1070657 12316 28 0 17680 WY SHERIDAN 12 13 50 372 443720 1070657 32735 52 0 51233 GU AGANA 8 8 3.2 282 132553 -1444236 108 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 109 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 25511 GU AGANA 12 12 38.9 75 132613 -1444817 29232 GU TAMUNING 14 14 50 1 133009 -1444817 3255 PR AGUADA 50 50 50 343 74700 181906 671049 13067 853 2.3 71725 PR AGUADILLA 12 12 7.31 665 74705 180900 665900 35964 1570 1.9 61573 PR AGUADILLA 44 17 50 372 74920 181906 671042 17140 918 2.5 26602 PR AGUADILLA 32 34 250 605 180906 665923 35001 1383 7.2 26676 PR ARECIBO 60 14 50 242 74697 182721 665259 15109 1162 14.4 3001 PR ARECIBO 54 46 50 600 74610 181406 664536 16621 2420 5.7 4110 PR BAYAMON 36 30 50 329 74691 181640 660638 14518 2514 0.5 19777 PR CAGUAS 11 11 3.2 357 74649 181654 660646 16753 2655 0.1 8156 PR CAGUAS 58 48 50 329 74666 181640 660638 13039 2404 2.3 54443 PR CAROLINA 52 51 450 585 32803 181644 655112 30994 2770 0.1 73901 PR FAJARDO 13 13 2.8 863 181836 654741 34770 2702 0.1 2174 PR FAJARDO 40 16 150 839 58931 181836 654741 30040 2720 3.9 15320 PR FAJARDO 34 33 50 848 74765 181836 654741 24903 2589 0.2 18410 PR GUAYAMA 46 45 50 642 74921 181648 655108 23740 2490 0.9 67190 PR HUMACAO 68 49 50 594 74922 181644 655112 19555 2503 0.7 60357 PR MAYAGUEZ 16 22 50 338 74738 181851 671124 16336 808 14.3 73336 PR MAYAGUEZ 22 23 400 693 65201 180900 665900 37898 1376 0.9 64865 PR MAYAGUEZ 5 29 1000 607 180902 665920 45696 1574 14.2 53863 PR MAYAGUEZ 3 35 1000 691 74923 180900 665900 45118 1962 0.1 19561 PR NARANJITO 64 18 50 142 74703 181734 661602 12482 2515 0.1 60341 PR PONCE 7 7 49 88 74346 180252 663916 19142 1154 0 19776 PR PONCE 9 9 3.2 825 74569 181009 663436 28603 3473 0 26681 PR PONCE 14 15 380 839 67269 181010 663436 41328 3364 5.6 58341 PR PONCE 20 19 700 269 65948 180449 664453 24888 1701 0.1 2175 PR PONCE 26 25 200 310 41622 180448 664456 19187 1516 0 29000 PR PONCE 48 47 50 247 74924 180450 664450 11769 1118 0.3 58340 PR SAN JUAN 24 21 1000 564 181645 655114 44300 3102 0.4 52073 PR SAN JUAN 4 27 1000 794 180642 660305 53151 3389 0.5 64983 PR SAN JUAN 2 28 871 861 74925 180654 660310 52474 3313 4 4077 PR SAN JUAN 30 31 75.9 287 181630 660536 15347 2490 0.6 28954 PR SAN JUAN 18 32 3.9 290 65128 181630 660536 7747 2088 6.4 109 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 110 NTSC DTV Facility ID State and City Chan Chan ERP (kW) HAAT (m) Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km) Population (thousand) Percent Interference Received 53859 PR SAN JUAN 6 43 791 825 74633 180642 660305 48283 3343 0 58342 PR SAN SEBASTIAN 38 39 700 627 65242 180900 665900 34738 1692 0 39887 PR YAUCO 42 41 185 832 181010 663436 39318 3448 0 3113 VI CHARLOTTE AMALIE 17 17 50 455 75035 182126 645650 24537 104 0.1 83270 VI CHARLOTTE AMALIE 43 1.4 28 182043 645545 1687 0 0 70287 VI CHARLOTTE AMALIE 12 44 50 458 64810 182126 645650 18987 14 0.2 84407 VI CHRISTIANSTED 15 15 50 296 74735 174521 644756 14545 0 0 2370 VI CHRISTIANSTED 8 20 501 292 74953 174521 644756 17484 7 0 83304 VI CHRISTIANSTED 39 23 0.85 130 174440 644340 5461 0 0 110 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 111 APPENDIX C INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ACT ANALYSIS 1. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (“ RFA”) 1 the Commission has prepared this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (“ IRFA”) concerning the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this Seventh Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“ Notice” or “Seventh FNPRM”). Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments indicated on the first page of the Notice. The Commission will send a copy of the Notice, including this IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA). 2 In addition, the Notice and IRFA (or summaries thereof) will be published in the Federal Register. 3 A. Need for and Objectives of the Proposed Rules 2. The Seventh FNPRM proposes a new DTV Table of Allotments (“ DTV Table”), providing all eligible broadcast television stations with channels for DTV operations after the DTV transition. The new DTV Table will affect all commercial and noncommercial broadcast television stations, including low power and TV translator stations. 3. The proposed new DTV Table is based on the tentative channel designations (“ TCDs”) announced for eligible broadcast licensees through the channel election process, as well as on the Commission’s efforts to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure the best possible service to the public, including service to local communities. During this election process, which was established by the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, broadcast licensees selected their ultimate DTV channel inside the “core spectrum,” consisting of current television channels 2 through 51 (54- 698 MHz). 4 In developing the proposed new allotments, the Commission sought to accommodate broadcasters’ channel preferences, as well as their replication and maximization service area certifications (made via FCC Form 381). 4. We believe our proposed new DTV Table achieves the goals set forth for the channel election process. 5 First, the proposed new DTV Table provides all eligible stations with channels for DTV operations after the DTV transition. Second, we believe our proposed new DTV Table is the result of informed decisions by licensees when making their channel elections and that licensees benefited from the clarity and transparency of the channel election process. Third, we believe our proposed new DTV Table recognizes industry expectations by protecting existing service and respecting investments already made, to the extent feasible. Finally, we 1 See 5 U. S. C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U. S. C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (“ SBREFA”), Pub. L. No. 104- 121, Title II, 110 Stat. 847 (1996). The SBREFA was enacted as Title II of the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996 (“ CWAAA”). 2 See 5 U. S. C. § 603( a). 3 See id. § 603( a). 4 Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 18292, ¶ 33. 5 Id. at 18291, ¶ 31. 111 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 112 believe the proposed new DTV Table reflects our efforts to promote overall spectrum efficiency and ensure the best possible DTV service to the public. B. Legal Basis 5. The authority for the action proposed in this rulemaking is contained in Sections 1, 4( i) and (j), 5( c)( 1), 7, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 316, 319, 324, 336, and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U. S. C §§ 151, 154( i) and (j), 155( c)( 1), 157, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 316, 319, 324, 336, and 337. C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rules Will Apply 6. The RFA directs the Commission to provide a description of and, where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that will be affected by the proposed rules, if adopted. 6 The RFA generally defines the term “small entity” as having the same meaning as the terms “small business,” small organization,” and “small government jurisdiction.” 7 In addition, the term “small business” has the same meaning as the term “small business concern” under the Small Business Act. 8 A small business concern is one which: (1) is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the SBA. 9 The proposed rules, if adopted, in this Seventh FNPRM, will primarily affect television stations. A description of such small entities, as well as an estimate of the number of such small entities, is provided below. 7. Television Broadcasting. The proposed rules and policies apply to television broadcast licensees and potential licensees of television service. The SBA defines a television broadcast station as a small business if such station has no more than $13 million in annual receipts. 10 Business concerns included in this industry are those “primarily engaged in broadcasting images together with sound.” 11 According to Commission staff review of the BIA 6 Id. § 603( b)( 3). 7 5 U. S. C. § 601( 6). 8 Id. § 601( 3) (incorporating by reference the definition of “small business concern” in 15 U. S. C. § 632). Pursuant to 5 U. S. C. § 601( 3), the statutory definition of a small business applies “unless an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and after opportunity for public comment, establishes one or more definitions of such term which are appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such definition( s) in the Federal Register.” 5 U. S. C. § 601( 3). 9 15 U. S. C. § 632. Application of the statutory criteria of dominance in its field of operation and independence are sometimes difficult to apply in the context of broadcast television. Accordingly, the Commission’s statistical account of television stations may be over- inclusive. 10 See 13 C. F. R. § 121. 201, NAICS Code 515120 (2006). 11 Id. This category description continues, “These establishments operate television broadcasting studios and facilities for the programming and transmission of programs to the public. These establishments also produce or transmit visual programming to affiliated broadcast television stations, which in turn broadcast the programs to the public on a predetermined schedule. Programming may originate in their own studios, from an affiliated network, or from external sources.” Separate census categories pertain to businesses primarily engaged in producing programming. See Motion Picture and Video Production, NAICS code 512110; Motion Picture and Video (continued….) 112 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 113 Publications, Inc. Master Access Television Analyzer Database (BIA) on June 16, 2006, about 915 of the 1,305 commercial television stations 12 (or about 70 percent) have revenues of $13 million or less and thus qualify as small entities under the SBA definition. We note, however, that, in assessing whether a business concern qualifies as small under the above definition, business (control) affiliations 13 must be included. Our estimate, therefore, likely overstates the number of small entities that might be affected by our action, because the revenue figure on which it is based does not include or aggregate revenues from affiliated companies. 8. In addition, an element of the definition of “small business” is that the entity not be dominant in its field of operation. We are unable at this time to define or quantify the criteria that would establish whether a specific television station is dominant in its field of operation. Accordingly, the estimate of small businesses to which rules may apply do not exclude any television station from the definition of a small business on this basis and are therefore over-inclusive to that extent. Also as noted, an additional element of the definition of “small business” is that the entity must be independently owned and operated. We note that it is difficult at times to assess these criteria in the context of media entities and our estimates of small businesses to which they apply may be over- inclusive to this extent. 9. Class A TV, LPTV, and TV translator stations. The proposed rules and policies also apply to licensees of Class A TV stations, low power television (LPTV) stations, and TV translator stations, as well as to potential licensees in these television services. The same SBA definition that applies to television broadcast licensees would apply to these stations. The SBA defines a television broadcast station as a small business if such station has no more than $13 million in annual receipts. 14 Currently, there are approximately 589 licensed Class A stations, 2,157 licensed LPTV stations, and 4,549 licensed TV translators. 15 Given the nature of these services, we will presume that all of these licensees qualify as small entities under the SBA definition. We note, however, that under the SBA’s definition, revenue of affiliates that are not LPTV stations should be aggregated with the LPTV station revenues in determining whether a concern is small. Our estimate may thus overstate the number of small entities since the revenue figure on which it is based does not include or aggregate revenues from non- LPTV affiliated companies. We do not have data on revenues of TV translator or TV booster stations, but virtually all of these entities are also likely to have revenues of less than $13 million and thus may be categorized as small, except to the extent that revenues of affiliated non- translator or booster entities should be considered. (Continued from previous page) Distribution, NAICS Code 512120; Teleproduction and Other Post- Production Services, NAICS Code 512191; and Other Motion Picture and Video Industries, NAICS Code 512199. 12 Although we are using BIA’s estimate for purposes of this revenue comparison, the Commission has estimated the number of licensed commercial television stations to be 1, 371. See News Release, “Broadcast Station Totals as of March 31, 2006” (dated May 26, 2006); available at http:// www. fcc. gov/ mb/ audio/ totals/ index. html. 13 “[ Business concerns] are affiliates of each other when one concern controls or has the power to control the other or a third party or parties controls or has to power to control both.” 13 C. F. R. § 121.103( a)( 1). 14 See 13 C. F. R. § 121. 201, NAICS Code 515120 (2006). 15 See News Release, “Broadcast Station Totals as of March 31, 2006” (dated May 26, 2006); available at http:// www. fcc. gov/ mb/ audio/ totals/ index. html. 113 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 114 D. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping and other Compliance Requirements 10. The proposals set forth in this Notice would involve no changes to reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements beyond what is already required under the current regulations. E. Steps Taken to Minimize Significant Impact on Small Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered 11. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach, which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1) the establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to small entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities; (3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small entities. 16 12. The proposed new DTV Table provides all eligible broadcast television stations – large and small alike – with channels for post- transition DTV operations. Small broadcasters, just like large ones, benefited from participating in the channel election process. The proposed new DTV Table is the result of informed decisions by licensees when making their channel elections and licensees benefited from the clarity and transparency of the channel election process. Moreover, the proposed new DTV Table recognizes industry expectations by protecting existing service and respecting investments already made, to the extent feasible. The TCDs announced primarily were based on the channels elected by licensees. We estimate that more than 98 percent of licensees participating in the channel election process received a TCD for the channel they elected. The Notice invites comment from broadcasters, including small broadcasters, on the proposed new DTV Table. 13. In addition, the Notice provides an opportunity for certain licensees demonstrating special circumstances to request alternative channel assignments. The Commission will consider requests for alternative channel assignments only from (1) licensees who demonstrate that they cannot construct their full, authorized DTV facilities 17 with their present TCD because doing so would cause unacceptable interference to protected TCDs, 18 (2) licensees with international coordination issues which the Commission has been unable to resolve with the Canadian and Mexican governments, 19 (3) licensees with TCDs for low- VHF channels (channels 2- 6); and (4) new licensees and permittees that attained such status after the start of the channel election process and to which we assigned a TCD for post- transition DTV operations because their 16 5 U. S. C. § 603( c)( 1)-( c)( 4) 17 The term “full, authorized DTV facilities” here refers to the original facilities certified by the licensee in its FCC Form 381. We will not preclude requests for alternative channel assignments from licensees that modified their certified facilities after receiving a conflict letter in the first and second channel election rounds. 18 We will consider only engineering demonstrations here. Requests based on financial or other reasons will not be considered. 19 See Section III. E. infra. 114 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 115 assigned NTSC channel was determined to cause impermissible interference to existing licensees. 20 Licensees that want to change their DTV allotment, but which are not in any of these categories (e. g., are technically able to construct their full, authorized DTV facilities on their existing TCD) may request a change in allotment only after the proposed DTV Table is finalized and must do so through the existing allotment procedures, as set forth in Section 1.420 of our rules. 21 We believe small broadcasters with special circumstances will benefit from this opportunity. We also seek comment from small broadcasters on whether additional measures need to be taken in order to facilitate small broadcasters’ transition to their ultimate DTV channel. F. Federal Rules Which Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict with the Commission’s Proposals 14. None. 20 See Section III. F., infra. 21 47 C. F. R. § 1.420. 115 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06- 150 116 STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER ROBERT M. MCDOWELL Re: Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service (MB Docket No. 87- 268) Through this Further Notice, we begin the final stage of the transition of broadcasters to digital television. The Notice proposes a new DTV Table of Allotments, taking the seventh and final step to complete the DTV channel election process. As we embark on this final step, I want to commend the staffs of the Media Bureau and the Office of Engineering and Technology for their diligent work on this and other digital transition issues. I support the Further Notice and commend the Chairman on his leadership in this area. 116