Federal Communications Commission FCC 13-8 
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
FIRESIDE MEDIA and JET FUEL
BROADCASTING
On request for Inspection of Records and
Review of Estimated FOIA Processing Costs
FIRESIDE MEDIA 
For a New AM Broadcasting Station at Larga 
Vista, Texas
and
For a New AM Broadcast Station at Pass 
Christian, Mississippi 
and
JET FUEL BROADCASTING
For a New AM Broadcast Station at Winooski, 
Vermont 
 
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)    
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
 
FOIA Control No. 2011-131
File No. BNP-20040130APE
Facility ID No. 1661371
File No. BNP-20040130APU
Facility ID No. 161128
File No. BNP-20040130AQL
Facility No. 161328
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Adopted:  January 17, 2013 Released: January 18, 2013
By the Commission:
I.  INTRODUCTION
 1.    By this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we deny a petition1 filed by Fireside Media and Jet 
Fuel Broadcasting (collectively “Fireside”), 2 which requests reconsideration of a Commission order 
  
1 See “Request for Rescinding of Illegal FCC Order 12-94, With Reinstatement Before Chairman and 
Commissioners for Fair Hearing, Inclusive of Allowance for Heretofore Denied Conferencing Opportunity for 
Appellant With the Chairman and Each Commissioner -- Given Egregious Issues of Agency Misconduct, Error and 
Retaliation Against Appellant that Appellant Must Be Able to Address Directly With Commissioners to Guarantee 
Any Semblance of a Fair Hearing,” filed September 21, 2012 (“Petition”).
Federal Communications Commission FCC 13-8 
2
(“Consolidated Order”), which dismissed as procedurally defective Fireside’s earlier attempt to seek 
reconsideration or review of various actions by the Commission and the Media Bureau (MB).3 These 
actions concern both MB’s dismissal of Fireside’s AM radio license applications for failure to meet filing 
deadlines and a Commission decision that upheld both  the Office of General Counsel’s (OGC’s)  decision 
denying a fee waiver and MB’s decision setting fees for Fireside’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 
request.4  
II. DISCUSSION
2.     We find that Fireside’s Petition gives us no reason to reconsider the Consolidated Order.  It is 
well established that “[r]econsideration will not be granted to debate matters upon which the Commission 
has already deliberated and spoken.”5 For the most part Fireside simply rehashes arguments that we have 
already fully considered and rejected.6  
3.     To the extent that Fireside raises matters that have not already been fully considered by the 
Commission, they are plainly without merit.  First, Fireside contends that its principal Dave Garey should 
have been given an opportunity to speak to the Chairman and the Commissioners before the Commission 
adopted the Consolidated Order.7 Indeed, Fireside asserts that its FOIA request was “fast-tracked with 
absolutely no opportunity for a fair hearing.”8 Fireside’s arguments, however, were fully considered by the 
Commission, in a manner providing for their “prompt and efficient disposition.”9 Moreover, there is no 
requirement that the Commission permit oral presentations on matters under consideration and indeed the 
Communications Act permits the Commission to conduct its procedures in such manner “as will best 
conduce to the proper dispatch of business and to the ends of justice.”10
4.     Second, Fireside contends that the Consolidated Order must be rescinded because the online 
description of the item on circulation did not reference the fact that it addressed licensing issues as well as 
FOIA issues.11 We disagree.  The listing of documents on circulation is not required by statute or regulation 
and has no official effect.   Further, all the issues decided by the Commission in the Consolidated Order 
  
2 Fireside Media and Jet Fuel Broadcasting are sole proprietorships of Dave Garey.  For ease of reference they are 
both referred to in this order as "Fireside." 
3 See Fireside Media and Jet Fuel Broadcasting, FCC 12-94 (Aug. 22, 2012) (“Consolidated Order”), reported at 
2012 WL 3612570.
4 The Commission has considered and rejected numerous times Fireside’s arguments that it (1) should have been 
granted extensions for filing deadlines for its AM radio applications; (2) was unfairly burdened with penalties for
withdrawing bids in FM Auction 37; and (3) should not be charged fees for processing its FOIA request.    See 
Consolidated Order at ¶¶ 2-3 and cases cited therein. 
5 See, e.g., Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of License From Comcast Corporation and AT&T 
Corp. Transferors, to AT&T Comcast Corp., Transferee, 25 FCC Rcd 3492, 3493 ¶ 2 (2010).      
6 See supra note 4.
7 See Petition at 1-3.
8 See id. at 6.
9 See 47 U.S.C. § 155(a).
10 See 47 C.F.R. § 154(j).  See also SBC Communications, Inc, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7593 n.24 (2002) (Section 4(j) of 
the Communications Act gives the Commission broad discretion to make procedural rulings), citing U.S. v. 
Schreiber, 381 U.S. 279, 289 (1965); FCC v. WJR, 337 U.S. 265, 282 (1949) (deciding whether to permit oral 
argument is within the Commission’s discretion under section 4(j) except where the statute expressly requires it).
11 See Petition at 3-4.
Federal Communications Commission FCC 13-8 
3
were raised by Fireside in a single pleading.12. The Commission properly considered these issues and 
Fireside did not suffer any prejudice because the document’s title on the online circulation list did not 
reference all issues in Fireside’s pleading. We therefore deny Fireside’s Petition.  
5.    As an additional matter, we note that Fireside’s pleadings have been notably repetitious and 
lacking in merit.13 We have recently imposed sanctions on a party for filing frivolous pleadings where the 
pleadings were “based on arguments that have been specifically rejected by the Commission” or otherwise 
had “no plausible basis for relief.” 14 If Fireside continues to file pleadings of this nature, we authorize OGC 
to refer matters to the Enforcement Bureau to consider whether to impose sanctions on Fireside for filing 
frivolous pleadings, including a possible forfeiture.  
III.       ORDERING CLAUSE
6.     Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Petition filed by Fireside Media and Jet Fuel 
Broadcasting IS DENIED.
7.  The officials responsible for this action are: Chairman Genachowski and Commissioners 
McDowell, Clyburn, Rosenworcel, and Pai.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
 
  
  
12 See “Request for Reconsideration of FCC 11-158, Which Continues to Obstruct Vital Public Documents Detailing 
Reported Misconduct in the FCC's FM Spectrum Auction Process; and Request for Acceptance of Appeal of DA-
11-1164, With Reinstatement of Reconsideration Before the Commission of FCC 10-108” (Nov. 25, 2011).
13 See supra note 4.
14 See Warren C. Havens, 26 FCC Rcd 10888, 10892 ¶ 11 (2011), reaffirmed, 27 FCC Rcd 2756 (2012).  The 
Commission found that it inherent authority to impose sanctions for frivolous pleadings.  See 27 FCC Rcd at 2759 ¶ 
10.