Federal Communications Commission FCC 14-21
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Cox Radio, Inc. and SummitMedia, LLC, 
Applications For Consent to Assign Licenses
WAGG(AM), Birmingham, AL
WBHJ(FM), Midfield, AL
WBHK(FM), Warrior, AL
WBPT(FM), Homewood, AL
WENN(AM), Birmingham, AL
WZNN(FM), Gardendale, AL
WZZK-FM, Birmingham, AL
WHZT(FM), Williamston, SC
WJMZ-FM, Anderson, SC
KCCN-FM, Honolulu, HI
KINE-FM, Honolulu, HI
KKNE(AM), Waipahu, HI
KPHW(FM), Kaneohe, HI
KRTR(AM), Honolulu, HI
KRTR-FM, Kailua, HI
WQNU(FM), Lyndon, KY
WRKA(FM), Louisville, KY
WVEZ(FM), St. Matthews, KY
WSFR(FM), Corydon, IN
WHTI(FM), Lakeside, VA
WKHK(FM), Colonial Heights, VA
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
File No. BAL-20130212ABK
Facility ID No. 48717
File No. BALH-20130212ABL
Facility ID No. 730
File No. BALH-20130212ABM
Facility ID No. 65227
File No. BALH-20130212ABN
Facility ID No. 5355
File No. BAL-20130212ABO
Facility ID No. 6411
File No. BALH-20130212ABP
Facility ID No. 71417
File No. BALH-20130212ABQ
Facility ID No. 48724
File No. BALH-20130212ABR
Facility ID No. 5971
File No. BALH-20130212ABS
Facility ID No. 1303
File No. BALH-20130212ABT
Facility ID No. 34552
File No. BALH-20130212ABU
Facility ID No. 34553
File No. BAL-20130212ABV
Facility ID No. 14937
File No. BALH-20130212ABW
Facility ID No. 27424
File No. BAL-20130212ABX
Facility ID No. 13880
File No. BALH-20130212ABY
Facility ID No. 50118
File No. BALH-20130212ABZ
Facility ID No. 20332
File No. BALH-20130212ACA
Facility ID No. 48290
File No. BALH-20130212ACB
Facility ID No. 53535
File No. BALH-20130212ACC
Facility ID No. 55499
File No. BALH-20130212ACD
Facility ID No. 27439
File No. BALH-20130212ACE
Facility ID No. 319
Federal Communications Commission FCC 14-21
2
WKLR(FM), Fort Lee, VA
WURV(FM), Richmond, VA
Cox Radio, Inc. and Connoisseur Media Licenses, 
LLC, Applications For Consent to Assign Licenses
WEZN-FM, Bridgeport, CT
WFOX(FM), Norwalk, CT
WPLR(FM), New Haven, CT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
File No. BALH-20130212ACF
Facility ID No. 71330
File No. BALH-20130212ACG
Facility ID No. 37230
File No. BALH-20130212ACH
Facility ID No. 48721
File No. BALH-20130212ACI
Facility ID No. 14379
File No. BALH-20130212ACJ
Facility ID No. 46968
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Adopted:  February 27, 2014 Released: February 28, 2014
By the Commission:
1. The Commission has before it for consideration an Application for Review (“AFR”) filed 
on May 28, 2013, by Citizens for Equity in Taxation (“CET”).
1
  CET seeks review of a letter issued by 
the Media Bureau, Audio Division (“Bureau”), which denied an informal objection that CET filed against 
applications to assign the licenses of 26 radio stations from Cox Radio, Inc. to SummitMedia, LLC and 
Connoisseur Media Licenses, LLC.
2
  In the Letter, the Bureau declined to alter the Commission’s 
treatment of transactions involving like-kind exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.  
The Bureau also found that CET raised only general concerns that were not specific to the transactions.  
Finally, the Bureau refused to require the applicants to submit additional information regarding the 
proposed transactions.
2. In the AFR, CET indicates that it does not “seek to stay the effective date of the grant” or 
“otherwise interfere with the administrative finality of the transactions.”
3
  CET instead seeks to have the 
Commission impose, on a prospective basis only, new requirements for future applicants involved in 
proposed like-kind exchanges.
4
  We find that the AFR is deficient because it fails to actually challenge an 
“action taken pursuant to delegated authority” as required by Section 1.115(a) of the Commission’s rules.
5
  
                                                     
1
Cox Radio, Inc. (“Cox”), SummitMedia, LLC (“Summit”), and Connoisseur Media Licenses, LLC 
(“Connoisseur”) filed a Joint Opposition to Application for Review on June 12, 2013.
2
Cox Radio, Inc. and SummitMedia, LLC, Letter, 28 FCC Rcd 5674 (MB 2013) (“Letter”).  CET had captioned its 
pleading as a petition to deny.  However, in the Letter, the Bureau found CET lacked standing to file a petition to 
deny and treated CET’s pleading as an informal objection.  CET does not challenge this finding. 
3
AFR at 2 n.2.
4
AFR at 10.  CET invites us to treat the AFR as a petition for rulemaking should we determine that the changes it 
requests “can be accomplished only through a rule making proceeding.”  Id.  We decline this invitation.
5
47 C.F.R. § 1.115(a).
Federal Communications Commission FCC 14-21
3
3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Application for Review IS DISMISSED.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary