Federal Communications Commission FCC 16-106 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC Application for Antenna Structure Registration, Eureka Springs, AR ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ASR App. No. A0863982 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION AND REVIEW Adopted: August 5, 2016 Released: August 10, 2016 By the Commission: 1. In this Order on Reconsideration and Review, we address two filings related to an Antenna Structure Registration (ASR) application filed by AT&T Mobility Services, LLC (AT&T) for a proposed 260-foot lattice tower in Eureka Springs, Arkansas (Application): (1) a Petition for Reconsideration, submitted by Ms. Kristine B. Kendrick, 1 of a decision from the Competition and Infrastructure Policy Division (Division) 2 denying her request for further environmental review of the Application, 3 and (2) an Application for Review, submitted by Dr. Luis Contreras, 4 of the Division’s denial of his request for further environmental review of the same Application. Because AT&T withdrew the Application on June 10, 2014, we dismiss the Petition for Reconsideration and Application for Review as moot. 5 2. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r) and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 303(r) and 405, and Section 1.106 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR § 1.106, that the petition for reconsideration filed by Ms. Kristine B. Kendrick IS DISMISSED. 1 Petition for Reconsideration, filed Feb. 13, 2014 (Petition) (on file in Antenna Structure Registration Application No. A0863982). All pleadings and decisions referred to in this Order are on file in that Application, available at http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/asrApplicationSearch.jsp. 2 On May 12, 2015, the former Spectrum and Competition Policy Division was renamed the Competition and Infrastructure Policy Division. 3 AT&T filed the Application on November 7, 2013. Based on its review of the Application and requests, the Division denied the environmental requests on January 14, 2014. Email from Aaron Goldschmidt, Assistant Chief, Competition and Infrastructure Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, FCC to Dr. Luis Contreras et al. (Jan. 14, 2014). 4 Dr. Contreras subsequently filed numerous submissions pertaining to his Application for Review. 5 Pursuant to Section 1.106(a)(1) of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR § 1.106(a)(1), the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau is referring the Petition for Reconsideration to the Commission. Federal Communications Commission FCC 16-106 2 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 5(c)(4) and (5), and 303(r) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 155(c)(4) and (5), 303(r), and Section 1.115(g) of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR § 1.115(g), that the Application for Review filed by Dr. Luis Contreras IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary