Federal Communications Commission FCC 26-55 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion ) ) ) ) ) GN Docket No. 25-223 2026 SECTION 706 REPORT Adopted: August 13, 2026 Released: August 14, 2026 By the Commission: Chairman Carr and Commissioner Trusty issuing separate statements; Commissioner Gomez concurring and issuing a statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. STATUTORY STANDARD FOR THE SECTION 706 INQUIRY 4 III. BENCHMARKS FOR ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY 13 A. Benchmarks for Deployment 16 1. Fixed 16 2. Mobile 18 B. Schools and Classrooms 22 IV. BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT AND AVAILABILITY 23 A. Fixed Broadband Service 23 1. Data Sources and Methodologies 23 2. Fixed Broadband Data 30 B. Mobile Broadband Service 37 1. Data Sources and Methodologies 37 2. Mobile Broadband Data 38 C. Fixed and Mobile Broadband Service 42 D. Broadband Funding Data 43 E. Schools and Classrooms 47 F. Demographic Information 50 V. COMMISSION EFFORTS TO CLOSE THE DIGITAL DIVIDE 55 A. Measuring Broadband Deployment and Policy Development and Coordination 55 B. Removing Barriers to and Encouraging Broadband Investment 64 1. Unleashing High-Speed Infrastructure 65 2. Ensuring U.S. Wireless Leadership 71 3. Bolstering the U.S. Space Economy 74 4. Streamlining Regulations 79 5. Other Initiatives to Encourage Broadband Investment 80 C. Access to Spectrum 88 1. Access to Terrestrial Wireless Spectrum 88 2. Access to Direct-to-Device Spectrum 100 3. Access to Satellite Spectrum 108 D. Universal Service Support 112 1. Creating Incentives for Broadband Deployment in High-Cost Areas 112 2. Supporting Broadband Access for Schools and Health Care Providers 126 VI. SECTION 706 FINDING 131 VII. ORDERING CLAUSE 136 APPENDIX A I. INTRODUCTION 1. High-speed broadband is often essential to full participation in modern society—for work, education, health care, and nearly every other facet of American life. To measure the incremental progress in the availability of this critical enabling technology, Congress enacted what is now codified as Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Section 706 requires the Commission to determine and report annually on “whether advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion.” 47 U.S.C. § 1302(b). For simplicity in past inquiries, the Commission has sometimes used the term “broadband” to refer to “advanced telecommunications capability.” However, “advanced telecommunications capability” is a statutory term with a definition that is more limited than the term “broadband.” See id. § 1302(d)(1) (“The term ‘advanced telecommunications capability’ is defined, without regard to any transmission media or technology, as high-speed, switched, broadband telecommunications capability that enables users to originate and receive high-quality voice, data, graphics, and video telecommunications using any technology.”). As this definition makes clear, while all services providing advanced telecommunications capability are “broadband,” not all broadband services provide advanced telecommunications capability. Thus, in this Report, we do not equate the term “broadband” with the statutory term “advanced telecommunications capability,” but we do necessarily consider the availability of various broadband services that contribute to advanced telecommunications capability in our analysis under the statute. See Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as Amended by the Broadband Data Improvement Act, GN Docket No. 15-191, 2016 Broadband Progress Report, 31 FCC Rcd 699, 700 n.1 (2016) (2016 Report). 2. American innovation and investment have brought massive improvements in connectivity—whether fixed wireless, high-speed satellite broadband to the home, direct-to-device, or hybrid, multimodal networks—for the benefit of consumers. Meanwhile, the Commission has taken significant steps to narrow the digital divide by promoting competition in the telecommunications marketplace and removing barriers to infrastructure investment. The data presented in this Report reveal that market forces, industry developments, and our regulatory reforms are succeeding in delivering broadband to more Americans than ever before. Both fixed and mobile broadband providers have made great strides in bringing broadband service to the previously unserved or underserved. · High-speed residential broadband—whether cable, fiber, or fixed wireless—has become more widely available since our last Section 706 inquiry. From June 2024 to June 2025, the number of Americans lacking access to 100/20 Mbps When this Report presents broadband speed figures, both download and upload speeds are used. In the case of 100/20 Mbps, for example, we refer to broadband service that has a download speed of at least 100 Mbps and an upload speed of at least 20 Mbps. fixed terrestrial broadband service decreased by approximately 23%. See Fig. 1. Over a two-year period, this reduction was approximately 43%. See id. With the inclusion of satellite, deployment of broadband to the home or business appears to be virtually universally available to all Americans. See id. While satellite service is widely deployed, its usability may be limited by certain factors or during certain periods of time, resulting in slower speeds and higher latency in remote areas. See, e.g., Sacha Meinrath et al., X-Lab, Starlink Capacity Analysis v0.2 (July 28, 2025), https://thexlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Starlink_Analysis_Working_Paper_v0.2.pdf (Starlink Capacity Analysis v0.2); Omar Gallaa, CNET, Some Starlink Customers Report Getting Hit With Massive Demand Surcharge (July 15, 2026), https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/starlink-customers-report-demand-surcharges/ (July 2026 CNET Starlink Surcharge); Starlink, What is a Demand Surcharge?, https://starlink.com/sb/support/article/63d885d3-c269-21f9-69d6-3ed1b2fd18e9 (last visited Aug. 11, 2026) (Starlink Demand Surcharge Webpage); Starlink, Starlink Specifications, https://starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1470-99699-90 (last visited Aug. 11, 2026) (Starlink Specifications). · Consumers are also benefitting from the rapid increase in the availability of high-speed mobile broadband. The number of Americans lacking access to mobile 5G-NR broadband with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps declined by almost 16% from June 2024 to June 2025, and by over 30% from June 2023 to June 2025. See Fig. 6. · The number of competitive options available to Americans also continues to grow. From June 2023 to June 2025, the percentage of households with three or more fixed terrestrial broadband service options at 100/20 Mbps increased by approximately 56%. See Fig. 4. In addition, from June 2023 to June 2025, the percentage of Americans with access to fixed wireline service at a speed threshold of 100/20 for rural areas has increased at an even faster rate than in urban areas. See id.   Further, in June 2025, the inclusion of Fixed Wireless service in our analysis increases the percentage of the rural population with access to broadband at speeds of at least 100/20 Mbps by over 10%. See id. · Rural Americans also continue to experience major gains in the availability of high-speed broadband. From June 2023 to June 2025, the percentage of rural Americans lacking access to 100/20 Mbps fixed terrestrial broadband service decreased by over 44%. See id. Further, with the inclusion of satellite, 100/20 Mbps broadband deployment is available in most rural areas. See Fig. 5. However, as noted above, there are certain factors that could result in slower speeds and higher latency in remote areas. Supra n.5. 3. Today, we conclude our annual inquiry by finding that deployment of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans meets the statutory standard of being reasonable and timely. Notwithstanding these impressive results and our findings in this report, our work in closing the digital divide will not cease. On the contrary, we plan to continue our efforts to ensure that every single American has access to advanced telecommunications capability. II. STATUTORY STANDARD FOR THE SECTION 706 INQUIRY 4. Section 706 requires the Commission annually to conduct an inquiry “concerning the availability of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans (including, in particular, elementary and secondary schools and classrooms)” as part of an effort to “determine whether advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion.” 47 U.S.C. § 1302(b). If that determination is negative, the Commission “shall take immediate action to accelerate deployment of such capability by removing barriers to infrastructure investment and by promoting competition in the telecommunications market.” Id. 5. The statute identifies “availability” alone as the object of the Commission’s section 706 inquiry, Id. (stating that “[t]he Commission shall . . . initiate a notice of inquiry concerning the availability of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans”). and “availability,” in turn, depends on whether broadband “is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion.” Id. (emphasis added). The focus on deployment is underscored by the statutory directive in the event of a negative section 706 finding—that the Commission “take immediate action to accelerate deployment of [advanced telecommunications] capability.” Id. (emphasis added). The statutory remedy for deployment not being “reasonable and timely” is further deployment, a fact that underscores Congress’s emphasis on deployment as section 706’s singular focus. The term “availability” is used consistently in the Communications Act in view of deployment. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. §§ 641(13)(A), 642, 643. We note that Congress understood the universal service goals to be distinct from—not synonymous with—“availability.” For example, in the Communications Act’s specific section on “universal service,” Congress used the term “affordable” to modify the term “availability,” thus making it clear that the terms were not meant to be synonymous. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. § 254(i) (providing that “[t]he Commission and the States should ensure that universal service is available at rates that are just, reasonable, and affordable.”). Section 706 further limits our inquiry to whether advanced telecommunications capability “is being deployed,” as stated in the present-progressive tense. See 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3249-50, para. 6 (espousing belief that “the Infrastructure Act supports the view that the Commission must determine whether advanced telecommunications capability is available universally throughout the country, or, in the words of the statute, ‘to all Americans.’”) (citing 47 U.S.C. § 1302(b)) (original emphasis). 6. We conclude that the best interpretation of Section 706 confines our analysis to the incremental change in “availability” and “deployment,” as proposed in the Notice. See Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, GN Docket No. 25-233, Nineteenth Section 706 Report Notice of Inquiry, 40 FCC Rcd 6362 (2025) (Notice). Our conclusion follows from the application of well-settled law. Supreme Court precedent requires the Commission to follow the best textual interpretation of Section 706—for if a statutory reading “is not the best, it is not permissible.” Loper Bright, 603 U.S. at 400. Prior Commission decisions also compel the same mode of analysis. Indeed, with one outlier discussed immediately below, the Commission’s past broadband deployment reports have consistently taken a holistic view of the incremental progress in the deployment of advanced telecommunications capability and ultimately determined whether that progress was occurring in a reasonable and timely fashion. See, e.g., Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, GN Docket No. 20-269, Fourteenth Broadband Deployment Report, 36 FCC Rcd 836 (2021) (2021 Report); Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, GN Docket No. 19-285, 2020 Broadband Deployment Report, 35 FCC Rcd 8986 (2020) (2020 Report); Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, GN Docket No. 18-238, 2019 Broadband Progress Report, 34 FCC Rcd 3857 (2019) (2019 Report). Following our longstanding precedent, as this Report does here, enables the Commission to consider the most relevant and objective metric at our disposal—the physical deployment of broadband in the United States—to determine whether advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion. By examining the extent and pace of progress, the Commission is able to provide more useful information on how best to achieve universal broadband service goals by using the tools Congress explicitly identifies in section 706(a): “price cap regulation, regulatory forbearance, measures that promote competition in the local telecommunications market, or other regulating methods that remove barriers to infrastructure investment.” 47 U.S.C. § 1302(a); see also WTA Comments at 2-3. The record in this proceeding supports our analysis. See USTelecom – The Broadband Association Comments at 2-3 (USTelecom Comments); see also, e.g., CTIA Comments at 5-6; Free State Foundation Comments at 3; America’s Communications Association – ACA Connects Comments at 3 (ACA Connects Comments) (noting that the sole focus of the 706 inquiry is deployment and that the universal service goals, while important, “do not bear on the yes/no determination the statute requires.”). But see American Library Association (ALA) and the Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband (SHLB) Coalition Comments at 2-3 (ALA & SHLB Comments). While the American Library Association and the Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition acknowledge that “the Supreme Court’s Loper Bright decision created narrow guardrails on the interpretation of statutory language by federal agencies,” they suggest that it was “intended to apply to regulatory agencies in relation to decisions they make regarding the parties they regulate,” and that because “[t]he section 706 report is internal to the Commission . . . the agency has the authority to look at various aspects of the broadband landscape, not just those articulated in section 706 of the statutes.” Id. at 3. We disagree because we find that Supreme Court’s decision applies to statutory interpretation generally, including the interpretation of section 706, and we also note that the 706 report’s findings have implications for the regulated parties. 7. Against this precedent, a lone outlier—the 2024 Report—relied on extrinsic sources—namely the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Infrastructure Act) and the Report on the Future of the Universal Service Fund—to refashion our longstanding section 706 analysis. The 2024 Report considered, for the first time, universal service criteria such as adoption, affordability, and equitable access as part of the section 706 inquiry, despite their conspicuous absence from the statute. 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3251, para. 10; Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act § 60104(a)(2), Pub. L. No. 117-58, 135 Stat. 429, 1205 (2021) (Infrastructure Act) (defining the term “universal service goals for broadband” to mean “the statutorily mandated goals of universal service for advanced telecommunications capability under section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 1302)”); Report on the Future of the Universal Service Fund, 37 FCC Rcd 10041, 10046, para. 12 (2022) (Future of USF Report) (adopting the universal service goals of universal deployment, adoption, affordability, availability, and equitable access). We find that the 2024 Report’s novel interpretation of our statutory mandate erred in multiple respects. 8. For starters, the 2024 Report strayed from the statute’s plain language, which requires consideration of “availability”—not adoption, affordability, or equitable access. It reached this outcome by placing outsized reliance on unrelated developments 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3250, para. 7 (finding that the “statutory phrase must be interpreted in the underlying factual context of the Commission’s inquiry . . . [which] context includes Congress’s recent enactment of the Infrastructure Act, in which Congress made a historic federal investment in an effort to effectuate what it described as section 706’s ‘statutorily mandated goal of universal service for advanced telecommunications capability.’”) (citations omitted). rather than the text of section 706, which remained unamended. To that end, we disagree that the Infrastructure Act’s language referring to section 706 as embodying “the statutorily mandated goals of universal service for advanced telecommunications capability,” is best read to mean that the Commission’s inquiry must include an examination of multiple universal service goals not specified in section 706 and not be limited to the narrow question of physical deployment of service. 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3251, para. 10. As an initial matter, section 706 itself identifies multiple goals regarding the deployment of advanced telecommunications capability, including that such deployment be effectuated (i) on a “reasonable” basis, (ii) on a “timely” basis, and (iii) “by utilizing, in a manner [that is] consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity, price cap regulation, regulatory forbearance, measures that promote competition in the local telecommunications market, or other regulating methods that remove barriers to infrastructure investment.” 47 U.S.C. § 1302(a), (b). Furthermore, section 706 prescribes an additional directive in the event the Commission’s annual inquiry reaches a “negative” determination: namely, the goal of “accelerate[d] deployment of such capability by removing barriers to infrastructure investment and by promoting competition in the telecommunications market.” Id. § 1302(b). Because section 706 itself prescribes several goals pertaining to the universal deployment of advanced telecommunications capability, the relevant language in the Infrastructure Act—“the statutorily mandated goals of universal service for advanced telecommunications capability under section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 1302)”—is best read to refer to the goals expressly identified in section 706 itself. Contrary to the goals specified elsewhere, such as the goals identified in the Future of USF Report. Nothing in the Infrastructure Act suggests that Congress intended, sub silentio, to expand the Commission’s discretion under section 706 to any extent, much less to the extent contemplated by the interpretation set forth in the 2024 Report. We therefore find that section 706 is best read exactly as it is written, with its focus exclusively on deployment in accord with the express goals set forth in section 706 itself. 9. In returning to the analysis required by law, we do not minimize the importance of factors like affordability. Indeed, evidence shows broadband prices are going down as the cost of living skyrockets along other dimensions. See e.g., Arthur Menko, US Telecom, 2026 Broadband Pricing Index - Faster Speeds, Lower Prices (May 19, 2026), https://ustelecom.org/research/2026-bpi/ and George Ford, Phoenix Center Perspectives 26-04, More for Less: Broadband Price and Quality Trends, 2020–2026 (Jun. 24, 2026) https://phoenix-center.org/perspectives/Perspective26-04Final.pdf. The record makes clear that broadband providers themselves are concerned with and proactively addressing consumer costs. See e.g., CTIA Comments at 6 (noting that “Americans are paying less for far faster wireless service, including unlimited data plans that are more than 40% cheaper than in 2010.”) (citing Robert Wyrzykowski, 5G Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) Success in the US: A Roadmap for Broadband Success Elsewhere?, at fig.3, OpenSignal (June 6, 2024), https://www.opensignal.com/2024/06/06/5g-fixed-wireless-access-fwa-success-in-the-us-a-roadmap-for-broadband-success-elsewhere). We reject the argument that the universal service goals nonetheless warrant inclusion in the 706 inquiry because affordability and adoption in particular inform whether advanced telecommunications services are “meaningfully” or “effectively” available. See, e.g., ALA & SHLB Comments at 2; Benton Institute for Broadband & Society (Benton Institute) Comments at 1-3; Knik Tribe Comments at 2; Nova Labs, Inc. Comments at 6 (Nova Labs Comments); National League of Cities Reply at 2-3; Public Knowledge, UnidosUS, National Digital Inclusion Alliance, Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC, New America’s Open Technology Institute, and X-Lab Comments at 3-9 (Public Knowledge et al. Comments); WISPA – The Association for Broadband Without Boundaries Comments at 4 (WISPA Comments). While commenters argue that the plain meaning of “availability” is not synonymous with “deployment,” See Public Knowledge et al. Comments at 4; Benton Institute Comments at 3. we reiterate that the term “deployment” is the only metric actually identified in section 706 to assess “availability.” We further note that neither affordability, adoption, nor equitable access are synonymous with deployment. Moreover, we find that using affordability or any of the other universal service goals (excluding availability itself) as a proxy for availability would make the inquiry unduly subjective and ultimately undermine the report’s utility. The 2024 Report itself demonstrated that there is no universally accepted dataset or framework to measure the various universal service goals. See 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3298-309, paras. 89-104 (noting at para. 104 the “overall lack of data” in the record on affordability and stating that “more comprehensive data are necessary . . . to make any definitive conclusions about the number of households for which broadband remains unaffordable”), 3309-15, paras. 106-14 (noting at para. 114 that “multiple interrelated factors influence the adoption gap” and that “[f]urther work is needed explore the patterns of non-adoption of fixed broadband”), 3319-20, paras. 124-26 (equitable access). Setting aside challenges in collecting an accepted, relevant dataset and creating an objective framework to assess the universal service goals, We note that the universal service goals depend on many factors that would make it extremely challenging to effectively measure and assess and consumers may decline to adopt broadband for a variety of reasons, including their value preferences and usage needs. Accordingly, we decline Public Knowledge et al.’s suggestions that the section 706 analysis should “rigorously test” the universal goal of affordability, for example, against “lived realities of consumers. . . .” See Public Knowledge et al. Reply at 5. those terms are not found in the actual text of section 706. 10. We also find that the 2024 Report erred in focusing on whether advanced telecommunications capability “has been deployed,” instead of whether it “is being deployed.” See 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3249-50, para. 6 (espousing belief that “the Infrastructure Act supports the view that the Commission must determine whether advanced telecommunications capability is available universally throughout the country, or, in the words of the statute, ‘to all Americans.’”) (citing 47 U.S.C. § 1302(b)) (original emphasis). The 2024 Report’s binary interpretation of the threshold for issuing a passing or failing grade in the ultimate section 706 finding was not the best interpretation of section 706 because it effectively read the “reasonable and timely” language out of the statute. That interpretation seemingly found anything short of 100% availability insufficient to warrant a passing grade and thus disregarded Congress’s use of the present progressive tense in “is being deployed.” 47 U.S.C. § 1302(b) (“In the inquiry, the Commission shall determine whether advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion.”). The prior interpretation also disregarded Congress’s language for inquiries resulting in a negative determination—“shall take immediate action to accelerate deployment” Id. (emphasis added). —which confirms its focus on the pace of deployment that providers are making. Assessing the progress at which advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed is not only consistent with the plain reading of section 706 text, but also provides more helpful information to Congress and the public than an overly simplistic inquiry into whether or not 100% of Americans already have access to such capability. The Commission has used the progress-based deployment standard multiple times in its section 706 inquiries. See, e.g., 2021 Report, 36 FCC Rcd at 838-39, paras. 7-9; 2020 Report, 35 FCC Rcd at 8989-90, paras. 7-9; 2019 Report, 34 FCC Rcd at 3859-60, para. 8; Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, GN Docket No. 17-199, 2018 Broadband Deployment Report, 33 FCC Rcd 1660, 1663-64, paras. 10-13 (2018) (2018 Report), Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as Amended by the Broadband Data Improvement Act; A National Broadband Plan for Our Future, GN Docket Nos. 09-137, 09-51, Sixth Broadband Deployment Report, 25 FCC Rcd 9556, 9558, para. 2 (2010) (2010 Report). 11. The balance of the record developed in response to the Notice supports our return to a progress-based assessment in keeping with the plain language of section 706, See, e.g., ACA Connects Comments at 3 (“Congress has directed the Commission to assess progress towards universal deployment”); CTIA Comments at 3-5 (“is being deployed”); International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE) Comments at 1-2; NCTA – The Internet & Television Association Comments at 5-6 (“is being deployed”) (NCTA Comments); Free State Foundation Comments at 5 (“is being deployed”); USTelecom Comments at 2-3 (“is being deployed”); WISPA Comments at 3-4; WTA – Advocates for Rural Broadband Comments at 5-6 (WTA Comments). and we agree with commenters that an incremental approach more accurately captures the pace and trajectory of broadband deployment. WISPA Comments at 3-4. Such an assessment is far more useful than, as one commenter noted, “simply asking and answering the question posed by kids from the back seat of the car—‘are we there yet?’” WTA Comments at 2; see also USTelecom Comments at 2-3 (noting that a “progress-based interpretation recognizes that universal deployment is an ongoing national goal, and that the Commission’s task is to measure and accelerate advancement toward that goal rather than to redefine the inquiry as a static universal availability test.”); WISPA Reply Comments at 2-3. In this regard, we agree with NCTA that the statute’s language, “in a reasonable and timely fashion,” suggests that the Commission’s directive is to holistically assess the incremental progress of broadband deployment. NCTA Comments at 5-6. Public Knowledge et al. argues that our progress-based interpretation is “absurd,” claiming that once universal deployment is achieved, no further progress would be possible, which would seem to require a negative finding and require the Commission to take seemingly unnecessary remedial action. Public Knowledge et al. Comments at 4 (stating that under our “current interpretation, if affordable broadband was universally available to all Americans…then [the Commission] would have to issue a negative finding, since there would be no need for further deployments, and take remedial action. It is plain that this interpretation is absurd.”). We disagree. Public Knowledge et al. reads “reasonable and timely” out of the statute—if deployment were universal, maintaining a steady state of 100% deployment would, indeed, be reasonable and timely, and no remedial action would be necessary. We also note that the universe of potential locations at which to provide broadband service is ever-evolving, such as through new construction, which could require further deployment to maintain universal deployment. See infra n.88. 12. Accordingly, this Report will focus on the incremental progress being made in the deployment of advanced telecommunications capability. Returning to the Commission’s prior reading of the statute—that is, “whether advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion”—is the most faithful approach to fulfilling our statutory mandate. 47 U.S.C. § 1302(b). III. BENCHMARKS FOR ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY 13. Section 706 requires an analysis of advanced telecommunications capability, which is defined “without regard to any transmission media or technology, as high-speed, switched, broadband telecommunications capability that enables users to originate and receive high-quality voice, data, graphics, and video telecommunications using any technology.” Id. § 1302(d)(1); see also NCTA Comments at 8 (noting that both fixed and mobile can meet the definition of “advanced telecommunications capability”); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56, 153 (codified at 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.) (1996 Act). This forward-looking definition, which emphasizes technological neutrality, is significant in the current environment, given that technology silos continue to merge as technologies became more advanced. What once was possible only with a desktop computer and an ethernet cable is now also possible using a mobile device while on the go; as wi-fi coverage mixes with cellular coverage to allow access outside of one’s home, mobile infrastructure can be used to provision fixed service in the home; and satellite provides service both inside the home and directly to consumers’ mobile devices. 14. At the same time, modern market data reveal that consumers have inelastic demand for two types of broadband functionality: fixed and mobile. Fixed services provide connections to the home or office with substantial bandwidth needed for large data applications used by multiple devices at the location at the same time. See CCA Comments at 2-3; CTIA Comments at 17-18; INCOMPAS Comments at 10; NTCA Comments at 21; see also 2021 Report, 36 FCC Rcd at 840, para. 10. Mobile broadband provides advanced telecommunications capability while outside of the home. CCA Comments at 2; INCOMPAS Comments at 10; NCTA Comments at 8; NTCA Comments at 24-25; Safer Buildings Coalition Comments at 2. Many consumers continue to subscribe to both fixed and mobile broadband services, indicating that each service has additional functionalities that may not be fully captured if we were to analyze fixed and mobile broadband as full substitutes. Benton Institute Comments at 7 (citing Pew Research Center, Mobile Fact Sheet (Nov. 13, 2024)) (Pew Research); INCOMPAS Comments at 10; NCTA Comments at 8-9; NTCA Comments at 21-23; WISPA Comments at 5-6. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau tell a similar story: 4.7% of households have a fixed-broadband subscription only, 13.5% have a mobile-broadband subscription only, and 81.8% have both a fixed- and mobile-broadband subscription among households with a subscription. U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 1-Year Estimates Detailed Tables, Table B28002— “Presence and Types of Internet Subscriptions in Household”, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDT1Y2024.B28002?q=B28002 (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). Data in the record show that more than 73% of Americans have a wired high-speed connection and more than 76% have a mobile data plan. Benton Institute Comments at 7 (citing NTIA, Internet Use Survey (Nov. 2023)); see also INCOMPAS Comments at 10 (citing 2023 Pew Research showing 80% of adults subscribe to home broadband when available). Moreover, of the 91% of Americans that own a smartphone, Benton Institute Comments at 7 (citing 2024 Pew Research). only 15% of U.S. adults claim to be “smartphone-only” Internet users without fixed broadband service at home. Id. at 7 (citing 2024 Pew Research); INCOMPAS Comments at 10 (citing 2023 Pew Research); see also NCTA Comments at 3 (citing 2023 American Community Survey data showing an increasing trend currently amounting to 11.9% of connected U.S. households relying solely on mobile service for broadband); ICLE Comments, Attach. at 6 (citing the American Community Survey to note widespread access to internet at home with a substantial minority getting that access from their mobile wireless providers). Because the record supports that both services are capable of meeting the definition of advanced telecommunications capability independently but consumers continue to demonstrate that they use both services, we will analyze both of these services for this Report. See NCTA Comments at 9; see also INCOMPAS Comments at 10-11 (noting the need to analyze both fixed and mobile separately); NTCA Reply at 5-6. 15. Our conclusion that fixed and mobile broadband are not yet full substitutes does not necessarily mean that we consider access to both types of broadband services to be necessary for a location (or person) to have access to advanced telecommunications capability, as the Commission concluded in the 2024 Report. See 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3258-59, para. 21. The Commission’s section 706 inquiry focuses on whether users can actually participate in modern digital life—not whether they have access to multiple broadband transmission paths. A. Benchmarks for Deployment 1. Fixed 16. We maintain 100/20 Mbps as our benchmark in defining advanced telecommunications capability for fixed broadband. The Commission adopted this benchmark for the first time in the 2024 Report, the most recent report. 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3259, para. 22. The record unanimously supports a benchmark of at least this speed, ALA & SHLB Comments at 3; CTIA Comments at 17-18; Fiber Broadband Association Comments at 6 (FBA Comments); NRECA Comments at 6-8; NTCA Comments at 16-18; Public Knowledge et al. Comments at 10; USTelecom Comments at 4-5; WTA Comments at 5-6. and we are not aware of a reason why it should be reduced. CTIA explains that “[t]he consumer experience confirms that 100/20 Mbps fixed service meets the needs of U.S. consumers—with 100/20 Mbps speeds, a household in the United States can engage in telework, telehealth, educational, social, and entertainment digital activities, as well as contact emergency services.” CTIA Comments at 17-18. Some commenters suggest that we should raise our benchmark to faster speeds or, at minimum, raise the upload speed to a symmetrical 100 Mbps. FBA Comments at 6; NRECA Comments at 6-8; NTCA Comments at 16-18. Such commenters, however, rely almost exclusively on market trends and aspirational standards rather than an analysis of the present use of broadband service. Id. We agree with USTelecom that it would be premature to raise our benchmark beyond the 100/20 Mbps benchmark currently used for the still-nascent BEAD program. USTelecom Comments at 4-5. 17. As part of our return to following the plain language of section 706, we adopt our proposal from the Notice to abolish without replacement the long-term goal of 1,000/500 Mbps established in the 2024 Report. 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3259, para. 22. A long-term goal is not mentioned in section 706 and could appear to violate our obligation to conduct our analysis in a technologically neutral manner. At present, it is impossible to predict long-term technological developments and the evolution of consumer preferences. Such matters were at least sufficiently difficult to predict that the Commission in the 2024 Report did not adopt a time frame for its long-term goal. See id. at 3273, para. 51. WTA argues that broadband service providers’ attempts to predict long-term technological developments as part of their business demonstrates that such predictions are possible. WTA Comments at 10. At the same time, however, WTA acknowledges that the difficulty of this process and at no point offers a suggested time frame for a long-term goal, which demonstrates the impracticality of a long-term goal. See id. We believe it prudent to continue to monitor technological developments and consumer preferences and adapt our current benchmark, as well as relevant high-cost support programs, accordingly. We disagree with commenters arguing that our concern about technological neutrality merely serves to accommodate technologies that may currently offer slower speeds. See ALA & SHLB Comments at 3-4; NRECA Comments at 4-5; Public Knowledge et al. Comments at 11-12; WTA Comments at 8-9. At present, we do not know the nature of future consumer preferences and, considering that the goal is not required by the statute and does not serve any positive purpose (as discussed herein), we believe it prudent to abolish it. As NCTA correctly observes, “Technological advancements and consumer demand will continue to drive increases in broadband speeds without regard to any artificial long-term goal established by the Commission.” NCTA Comments at 8. Other commenters support our reasoning for abolishing the long-term goal. See, e.g., CTIA Comments at 19; Free State Foundation Comments at 4; WISPA Comments at 6. Affordable, reliable, high-speed connectivity will be essential, for example, to American leadership in the global AI economy. See, e.g., Nokia, Build First, Lead Forever: Why AI Infrastructure is America’s Next Advantage, https://www.nokia.com/asset/215238/ (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). We disagree with commenters suggesting without evidence that establishing a long-term goal is necessary to encourage innovation and enhance American competitiveness. See Benton Institute Comments at 11; NRECA Comments at 4-5; Public Knowledge et al. Comments at 11-12. The private sector, driven by competition, does not need the Commission to centrally plan technological development. 2. Mobile 18. Consistent with past Commission practice, we decline to set a single performance benchmark for determining the service availability of advanced telecommunications capability for mobile services (mobile advanced telecommunications capability) in this Report. As in previous reports and inquiries, we continue to recognize that the performance characteristics of mobile service can be highly variable, both geographically and temporally. 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3287-88, para. 71 (declining to set a benchmark, noting the inherent variability in the performance characteristics of mobile service); Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, GN Docket No. 22-270, Seventeenth Section 706 Report Notice of Inquiry, 38 FCC Rcd 10666, 10678, para. 30 (2023) (2023 NOI); 2021 Report, 36 FCC Rcd at 843-44, para. 15 (same); see also CTIA Comments at 15-16 (“[T]he Commission should consider a variety of indices, rather than a specific benchmark, to conclude that the deployment of mobile advanced telecommunications capability is reasonable and timely.”); 2018 Report, 33 FCC Rcd at 1672-74, paras. 30-34 (discussing various influencing factors, such as received signal quality, cell traffic loading, and network capacity in different locations). Accordingly, rather than setting a single performance benchmark, we instead use multiple speed metrics. See, e.g., 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3287-88, para. 71; 2021 Report, 36 FCC Rcd at 843-44, para. 15. 19. We focus our main analysis of mobile broadband service availability on a threshold speed for 5G-NR of 35/3 Mbps, the highest speed that the Commission collects in the Broadband Data Collection (BDC) for mobile broadband. For a description of the BDC, see infra Sections IV.A.1, IV.B.1. Specifically, we analyze the provider-reported 5G-NR coverage in an outdoor stationary coverage environment based on the Commission’s June 2025 BDC coverage data. We have previously supplemented this analysis with Ookla speed test data. See 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3288, para. 71 (analyzing 5G-NR with a minimum 35/3 Mbps advertised speed); 2021 Report, 36 FCC Rcd at 844, para. 15 (analyzing 4G LTE with a minimum 5/1 Mbps advertised speed). This Report will focus on the provider-reported BDC data and not consider Ookla speed test data. Additionally, in Appendix A, we present other provider-reported coverage based on 5G-NR data at speeds of at least 35/3 Mbps in an in-vehicle mobile environment, 5G-NR data at speeds of at least 7/1 Mbps in both outdoor stationary and in-vehicle mobile environments, and 4G LTE at speeds of at least 5/1 Mbps in both outdoor stationary and in-vehicle mobile environments. 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3287-88, para. 71 & n.241. See Appx. A-2. 20. Commenters generally support the continuing use of multiple metrics to analyze deployment of mobile advanced telecommunications capability, but they differ on the particular speed and technology metrics and the types of data that the Commission should utilize. CTIA Comments at 15-17; see also CCA Comments at 3 (“CCA generally agrees with this [multiple metrics] approach but encourages the use of updated metrics and methodologies.”); Nova Labs Comments at 5, 7-8 (“While supporting the Commission’s proposed speed benchmarks, Helium Mobile’s operational experience demonstrates that speed alone is not a sufficient measurement of performance.”); Rural Wireless Association, Inc. Comments at 1-3 (urging the Commission to define mobile advanced telecommunications capability with 5G-NR data speeds of at least 35/3 Mbps, prioritize in-vehicle mobile environment coverage data, and exclude reported coverage data below 5G-NR at 35/3 Mbps) (RWA Comments); NCTA Comments at 6 (supporting the use of BDC data as “the primary source of data for this report”); Ookla LLC Reply at 2-3 (supporting the use of in-vehicle drive testing and crowdsource data to analyze the availability and performance of mobile advanced telecommunications capability) (Ookla Reply); SpectrumX Comments at 3 (“We encourage the Commission to consider alternative, unbiased data sources in its efforts towards measuring broadband availability accurately.”). Because 5G-NR continues to be the most advanced mobile technology service currently deployed by providers, it should remain the primary technology focus for our analysis. Although we agree with CTIA that 4G should not be overlooked as an important source of broadband connectivity given that a significant number of Americans continue to rely on 4G networks, CTIA Comments at 16-17. we focus primarily on 5G-NR at speeds of at least 35/3 Mbps as the generation of technology for this Report’s analysis. As stated in the 2024 Report, section 706 reports focus on advanced telecommunications capability, and we find that requires an analysis of mobile technology and speeds beyond the minimum speed adequate to originate and receive voice, data, graphics, and video telecommunications. 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3288, para. 72 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 1302(d)(1); Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as Amended by the Broadband Data Improvement Act, GN Docket No. 14-126, 2015 Broadband Progress Report and Notice of Inquiry On Immediate Action to Accelerate Deployment, 30 FCC Rcd 1375, 1390-91, paras. 19-23 (2015) (providing a legal analysis that these reports require an analysis of telecommunications capability that is “advanced”). We will, however, continue to evaluate data on 4G LTE at speeds of at least 5/1 Mbps in Appendix A-2, as detailed below and we reject arguments to exclude 4G LTE from this Report. See CCA Comments at 4. 21. Additionally, we find it appropriate to continue focusing our main analysis of mobile broadband service availability on a threshold speed of 35/3 Mbps for 5G-NR based on BDC data, as we did for the previous report. 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3287-90, paras. 71-75. While we acknowledge the alternative sources of data suggested by commenters, SpectrumX Comments at 3-4 (encouraging the Commission to use “alternative, unbiased data” such as Broadband MAP USA, or data collected from US Postal Service vehicles or garbage trucks); Nova Labs Comments at 6 (recommending data from its Helium Mobile operations); Ookla Reply at 2-3. we find it appropriate to continue relying on BDC data. CTIA Comments at 16; NCTA Comments at 6. The BDC is our primary resource of data for our section 706 analysis, and 35/3 Mbps remains the highest speed that the Commission collects. See 47 CFR § 1.7004(c)(3)(i). As we do not have BDC data on speeds beyond 35/3 Mbps, we have no basis to include such a metric in this report, and we reject CCA’s proposal to do so. See CCA Comments at 4. However, we disagree with RWA that we should exclude 5G-NR data speeds below 35/3 Mbps from our analysis. RWA Comments at 1-2. In order to provide a more complete picture of mobile deployment, we will continue to evaluate 5G-NR at speeds of 7/1 Mbps, and 4G LTE at speeds of 5/1 Mbps. Finally, while we focus on outdoor stationary coverage data for 5G-NR at 35/3 Mbps, we will continue to evaluate in-vehicle coverage data for 5G-NR at 35/3 Mbps, 7/1 Mbps and 4G LTE at 5/1 Mbps in addition to coverage in an outdoor stationary environment. We disagree with commenters that support adoption of in-vehicle draft test data as our primary source for mobile broadband, but note that we continue to assess in-vehicle coverage in Appendix A. See CCA Comments at 2-3; RWA Comments at 2-3 (arguing the Commission should define mobile advanced telecommunications capability as the availability of 5G-NR at 35/3 Mbps in an in-vehicle environment rather than an outdoor stationary environment); Ookla Reply at 2-3 (supporting CCA’s and RWA’s arguments in favor of in-vehicle drive testing). B. Schools and Classrooms 22. As part of its inquiry under section 706, the Commission is required to assess the deployment and service availability of advanced telecommunications capability to “elementary and secondary schools and classrooms.” 47 U.S.C. § 1302(b). Such an assessment measures our progress in ensuring that schools have the speed and bandwidth required to support educating America’s schoolchildren. We adopt our proposal to continue using our short-term benchmark of 1 Gbps per 1,000 students, which was adopted in the 2024 Report, and do not establish a long-term benchmark. Notice, 40 FCC Rcd at 6367-68, para. 14. We received no comments regarding the short-term benchmark. We find that progress toward meeting the short-term benchmark can be easily measured over time, and it remains “well-understood.” 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3326, para. 132. We decline to adopt a long-term benchmark and conclude that doing so could “skew[] the market by unnecessarily potentially picking technological winners and losers.” Notice, 40 FCC Rcd at 6367-68, para. 14. We also conclude that doing so is not required by Section 706. IV. BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT AND AVAILABILITY A. Fixed Broadband Service 1. Data Sources and Methodologies 23. As proposed in the Notice, we use data from the FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC) in our analyses of fixed broadband availability. Id. at 6368, para. 15. The BDC defines broadband to be available at a location if a provider either currently has a customer or can perform a “standard broadband installation” (that is, can complete a routine installation within 10 business days after a service request is initiated with no charges or delays attributable to the extension of the provider’s network). See FCC, Broadband Data Collection: Data Specifications for Biannual Submission of Subscription, Availability, and Supporting Data (Nov. 25, 2024), https://us-fcc.app.box.com/v/bdc-availability-spec (BDC Data Specifications); 47 CFR § 1.7004(c)(1). In December 2022, the Commission sunset the collection of broadband deployment data through the FCC Form 477. Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection; Modernizing the FCC Form 477 Data Program, WC Docket Nos. 19-195, 11-10, Order, 37 FCC Rcd 14957 (2022) (2022 Form 477 Order) (sunsetting the collection of broadband deployment data through FCC Form 477). The Commission clarified that it would continue to collect broadband and voice subscription data using the FCC Form 477, but filers would submit their data through the FCC BDC system. Id. at 14957, para. 1. The FCC Form 477 system stopped accepting data as of Dec. 31, 2022. See Broadband Providers No Longer Need to File Broadband Deployment Data Through FCC Form 477; FCC Form 477 Subscription Data Must Be Filed in the BDC System, WC Docket Nos. 19-195, 11-10, Public Notice, 33 FCC Rcd 15032, 15032 (WTB 2022). Even as the Commission continually strives to improve the BDC, See, e.g., Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection et al., WC Docket No. 11-10 et al., Sixth Report and Order and Fifth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 26-33 (May 21, 2026). that is the most granular, detailed collection of broadband availability data the FCC has available. It depicts location-level information on fixed broadband availability across the United States as well as standardized coverage maps for 3G, 4G LTE, and 5G-NR mobile broadband services. As part of the BDC, the Commission developed the Broadband Serviceable Location Fabric (Fabric). See Broadband Data Task Force Announces the Availability of the Production Version of the Broadband Serviceable Location Fabric, WC Docket Nos. 19-195, 11-10, Public Notice, 37 FCC Rcd 7537 (2022) (announcing that the Fabric was now available for broadband service providers and governmental entities to access); FCC Broadband Data Collection Help Center, What is the Location Fabric? (Aug. 2, 2023), https://help.bdc.fcc.gov/hc/en-us/articles/5375384069659-What-is-the-Location-Fabric-. The Fabric is a dataset of all locations in the United States where fixed broadband can be installed. See 47 U.S.C. § 642(b)(1)(A). The Fabric is subject to challenges and is updated every six months. 47 CFR §§ 1.7006(d), 1.7007. For a further description of updates to the Fabric, see FCC Broadband Data Help Center, Changes to the Fabric between Versions (July 31, 2025), https://help.bdc.fcc.gov/hc/en-us/articles/12382207389083-Changes-to-the-Fabric-between-Versions. At each location specified in the Fabric, providers must then report whether they make services “available,” as the term is used for BDC purposes, and specify the technology and maximum advertised speed at each such location. Providers of fixed broadband do this by either submitting a list of locations (by unique location ID) for which they can make their service “available” or by providing a polygon that can be overlaid onto the Fabric data. See 47 CFR § 1.7004(c)(1); BDC Data Specifications at 21-31. Providers of terrestrial fixed wireless broadband that choose to submit a polygon must also “submit information about their propagation models, base stations, carriers, link budgets, and clutter categories.” BDC Data Specification at 32. This allows the Commission to determine whether fixed broadband is available on a location-by-location basis. In addition to improved granularity, the BDC data are subject to input from consumers, state, local, and Tribal governmental entities, and other stakeholders who may submit challenges and crowdsource data to further refine the accuracy of fixed broadband availability data. Finally, the Commission’s verification and audit efforts collectively help to validate the accuracy of the data. The Knik Tribe identifies what it considers to be discrepancies between BDC data and the Knik Tribe’s own observations that may be potential issues with the Fabric relating to residences without addresses. Knik Tribe Comments at 3. We encourage the Knik Tribe itself, or encourage its members, to file challenges to the Fabric and/or BDC availability data if it believes either to be inaccurate. 24. Our estimates of fixed and mobile broadband availability use county-level population estimates developed by the U.S. Census Bureau, and Commission staff estimates. Commission staff developed population estimates by updating the 2020 block-level populations using the U.S. Census Bureau’s annual county- (or county-equivalent) level population and housing unit estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. These data are used in conjunction with U.S. Census Bureau Topological Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (TIGER) data to indicate new roads, that is, new housing development, to distribute population amongst the census blocks comprising each county (or county-equivalent). FCC, Staff Block Estimates, https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/data/staff-block-estimates (last visited Aug. 11, 2026) (Staff Block Estimates). We note that at the time of the analysis for this Report, the U.S. Census Bureau had not yet released the data needed to create the 2025 population estimates, thus the same base population is used in our analysis for 2024 and for 2025. The BDC offers sub-block, location-level broadband service availability data. The Fabric dataset, on which the BDC is based, contains the number of units in each Broadband Serviceable Location (BSL) but it does not contain information on the population of each BSL or unit therein. FCC Broadband Data Collection Help Center, About the Fabric: What a Broadband Serviceable Location (BSL) Is and Is Not (July 31, 2025), https://help.bdc.fcc.gov/hc/en-us/articles/16842264428059-About-the-Fabric-What-a-Broadband-Serviceable-Location-BSL-Is-and-Is-Not. To estimate the population with access to advanced telecommunications capability, we use our established block-level population estimation methodology as an input to estimate the population of each BSL. Generally, we estimate the population of each unit within a census block by iteratively assigning the estimated population of the block to BSLs in turn based on a fixed probability, where that fixed probability is a decreasing function of the total number of units in the block. In this way, the population of each census block will equal the sum of population counts across all units in the block, but each unit—and therefore each BSL—within a block will generally not have the same population. We then estimate the number of households by counting the number of populated units within BSLs. For example, if a block has a population of 20 persons (based on staff estimates or Census counts, depending on the year of the data) and six units distributed across three BSLs (based on the contemporaneous version of the Fabric), each person is essentially assigned to a unit in turn by rolling a six-sided die. In the end, the population of each BSL will be an integer, and the population of the six units will not necessarily be equal. For a comprehensive explanation of our population distribution methodology see the 2024 Report. 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3370-72, Appx. A, paras. 1-4. 25. Urban/Rural Classification. Urban/rural status is derived from the 2020 Urban Areas delineated by the U.S. Census Bureau. In this Report, we rely on the 2020 Census block geographies. United States Census Bureau, Urban and Rural (Sept. 26, 2023), https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/geo-areas/urban-rural.html. Census blocks are completely within or outside of an urban area. A block’s population, housing/BSLs, and territory are classified as urban if the block is within an Urban Area. Otherwise, a block’s population, housing/BSLs, and territory are considered rural. 26. Tribal Lands Classification. The Commission uses federally recognized American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Areas maintained by the U.S. Census Bureau as the source for Tribal lands classification. Data from the 2020 Census are used. For purposes of the analysis of Tribal lands in this Report, we use the definition that was used in the 2024 Report, the 2024 Communications Marketplace Report, and in the Commission’s Broadband Deployment Reports since 2012. See 2024 Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 3276-77, para. 57 & n.221; 2024 Communications Marketplace Report, 39 FCC Rcd 14116, 14315, para. 324 & n. 1001 (2024); Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, GN Docket No. 11-121, Eighth Broadband Progress Report, 27 FCC Rcd 10342, 10414-15 (2012). We acknowledge that the Commission has used other definitions of Tribal lands in other contexts. See, e.g., Transforming the 2.5 GHz Band, WT Docket No. 18-120, Report and Order, 34 FCC Rcd 5446, 5465-66, paras. 51-55 (2019); Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers, WC Docket Nos. 17-287, 11-42, 09-197, Fourth Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and Notice of Inquiry, 32 FCC Rcd 10475 (2017); Connect America Fund et al., WC Docket No. 10-90 et al., Report and Order, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and Order on Reconsideration, 33 FCC Rcd 11893, 11910-11, para. 55 & n.122 (2018); Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Announces Procedures for 2.5 GHz Rural Tribal Priority Window, WT Docket No. 18-20, Public Notice, 35 FCC Rcd 308, 313, para. 19 (WTB 2020). However, for purposes of this Report, we maintain our definition as previously employed. As identified by the U.S. Census Bureau, Tribal lands fall into one of the following American Indian Area/Alaska Native Area/Hawaiian Home Land Class Code categories: (1) legal federally recognized American Indian area consisting of reservation and associated off-reservation trust land; (2) legal federally recognized American Indian area consisting of reservation only; (3) legal federally recognized American Indian area consisting of off-reservation trust land only; (4) joint use areas (legal); (5) statistical American Indian area defined for a federally recognized Tribe that does not have reservation or off-reservation trust land, specifically a Tribal Designated Statistical Area (TDSA) or Oklahoma Tribal Statistical Area (OTSA); (6) joint use areas (statistical); (7) Alaskan Native Village Statistical Areas (ANVSAs); and (8) Hawaiian Home Lands established by the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1921. We exclude state recognized areas from the analysis of Tribal lands. Categories (1), (2), (3), and (4) are grouped together as Federal Reservations and categories (5) and (6) comprise Tribal Statistical Areas within this report. United States Census Bureau, TIGER/Line Shapefiles: Technical Documentation (Feb. 2021) https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/data/tiger/tgrshp2020/TGRSHP2020_TechDoc.pdf. 27. Fixed Broadband Technologies. When a provider reports that broadband is available at a particular location, it is also required to report the technology used to deliver the connection to the end user’s premises. The BDC offers nine mutually exclusive technology codes a provider can choose. For purposes of this Report, we separate these technology codes into three categories: Fixed Wireline Service (includes broadband services delivered via Copper Wire, Cable Modem, and Optical Carrier), Fixed Terrestrial Service (includes Fixed Wireline Services and services delivered via terrestrial fixed wireless), and Any Fixed Service (includes Fixed Terrestrial Services and services delivered via satellite). 28. Satellite Services. We estimate that 99.7% of the U.S. population has access to a 100/20 Mbps satellite broadband service as of June 30, 2025. As acknowledged by industry, service reliability declines during periods of congestion and actual speeds depend on location, time of day, and type of service plan. See Starlink Specifications. However, FCC Form 477 subscription data indicate satellite broadband accounts for only 2.3% of all fixed broadband connections. Staff analysis of FCC Form 477 subscription data as of June 30, 2025 (filings submitted as of Dec. 30, 2025). And as acknowledged by industry, service reliability may decline during periods of congestion and actual speeds could depend on location, time of day, and type of service plan. Starlink Specifications. To mitigate potential constraints, as well as to encourage more efficient use of spectrum and a more competitive satellite marketplace, the Commission recently updated the rules governing the sharing of spectrum between geostationary and non-geostationary satellite systems in 2026. See generally Modernizing Spectrum Sharing for Satellite Broadband, SB Docket No. 25-157, Report and Order, FCC 26-26 (May 1, 2026) (Satellite Spectrum Sharing R&O). Given this development, this Report presents estimates of fixed broadband availability both including and excluding satellite broadband services. 29. Terrestrial Fixed Wireless Services. We estimate that approximately 56% of the U.S. population has access to a 100/20 Mbps fixed wireless service as of June 30, 2025. However, Form 477 subscription data indicate fixed wireless services accounts for only 8.5% of fixed broadband connections. Staff analysis of FCC Form 477 subscription data as of June 30, 2025 (filings submitted as of Dec. 30, 2025). Nonetheless, both availability and subscriptions of fixed wireless services have seen rapid growth in recent years. For example, the Commission’s Internet Access Services Report indicates fixed wireless services accounted for only 2.9% of fixed broadband connections as of June 30, 2022, Federal Communications Commission, Office of Economics & Analytics, Industry Analysis Division, Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2022 at 7, Fig. 4, (May 3, 2024), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-402310A1.pdf. implying the share of connections delivered via fixed wireless has nearly tripled in three years. Given this rapid growth, as well as section 706’s requirement of technological neutrality, 47 U.S.C. § 1302(d)(1). this Report presents estimates of fixed broadband availability both including and excluding fixed wireless services. 2. Fixed Broadband Data 30. Figure 1 shows service availability of fixed broadband at a speed threshold of 100/20 Mbps. While we present service availability estimates for June 2023, December 2023, June 2024, December 2024, and June 2025, we focus our comparative discussion on the June 2024 and June 2025 estimates. BDC data as of June 30, 2025, were first released to the National Broadband Map on Nov. 25, 2025, and therefore availability challenges are not incorporated into the version of the June 2025 data used in this report. The data used here do, however, incorporate any revisions received through Dec. 30, 2025. For purposes of this analysis, we measure service availability of fixed services based on the Fabric that is contemporaneous to each BDC collection round. FCC Broadband Data Collection Help Center, What is the Location Fabric? (Aug. 2, 2023), https://help.bdc.fcc.gov/hc/en-us/articles/5375384069659-What-is-the-Location-Fabric-. Unless otherwise explicitly stated, the data we use in our analysis of the fixed marketplace are for the 50 states and the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories. 31. As of June 30, 2025, approximately 94% of Americans had access to Fixed Wireline Service at our speed benchmark of 100/20 Mbps, an increase from approximately 93% in June 2024. When we include terrestrial fixed wireless, Figure 1 shows that as of June 2025, approximately 97% of Americans had access to Fixed Terrestrial Service at 100/20 Mbps, an increase from approximately 96% in June 2024. When we also include satellite service, Figure 1 shows that as of June 2025, approximately 99.7% of Americans had access to Any Fixed Service at 100/20 Mbps, the same as in June 2024. Figure 1 also shows that as of June 2025, Fixed Wireline and Fixed Terrestrial Service availability at 100/20 Mbps was generally higher in urban areas than in rural areas and Tribal lands. Fig. 1 Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps, 2023-2025 June 2023 Dec. 2023 June 2024 Dec. 2024 June 2025 Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Fixed Wireline Service United States 311.671 92.1% 313.786 92.7% 319.986 93.1% 321.466 93.5% 322.795 93.9% Urban Areas 265.511 98.5% 265.873 98.6% 269.991 98.7% 269.852 98.6% 270.024 98.7% Rural Areas 46.160 67.0% 47.913 69.6% 49.995 71.3% 51.614 73.7% 52.771 75.3% Tribal Lands 2.907 70.8% 2.980 72.5% 3.053 73.4% 3.070 73.8% 3.102 74.6% Fixed Terrestrial Service United States 320.037 94.5% 322.635 95.3% 329.945 96.0% 331.642 96.5% 333.102 96.9% Urban Areas 267.350 99.2% 267.665 99.3% 271.974 99.4% 272.114 99.5% 272.354 99.5% Rural Areas 52.687 76.5% 54.970 79.8% 57.970 82.7% 59.528 84.9% 60.748 86.7% Tribal Lands 3.258 79.3% 3.394 82.6% 3.519 84.6% 3.599 86.5% 3.643 87.6% Any Fixed Service United States 338.387 100.0% 338.407 100.0% 343.633 100.0% 343.662 100.0% 343.658 100.0% Urban Areas 269.566 100.0% 269.583 100.0% 273.604 100.0% 273.603 100.0% 273.609 100.0% Rural Areas 68.821 99.9% 68.824 99.9% 70.028 99.9% 70.060 100.0% 70.049 100.0% Tribal Lands 4.103 99.9% 4.103 99.9% 4.154 99.9% 4.158 100.0% 4.156 99.9% Pop. Evaluated 338.489 100.0% 338.489 100.0% 343.683 100.0% 343.683 100.0% 343.683 100.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BDC, Dec. 2024; FCC BDC, June 2024; FCC BDC, Dec. 2023; FCC BDC, June 2023; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. 32. Figure 2 shows service availability of advanced telecommunications capability on Tribal lands, by rural and urban areas and by major Tribal lands category. As of June 2025, service availability of Fixed Wireline Service at minimum speeds of 100/20 Mbps was approximately 57% for rural Tribal lands and 96% for urban Tribal lands. As of June 2025, approximately 78% of Americans living on Tribal lands in rural areas had access to Fixed Terrestrial Service at minimum speeds of 100/20 Mbps while approximately 99% of Americans living on Tribal lands in urban areas had such access. The same pattern is observed for Any Fixed Service at minimum speeds of 100/20 Mbps for June 2025, though to a lesser degree. Looking at changes from June 2024 to June 2025, Fixed Wireline Service and Fixed Terrestrial Service availability at minimum speeds of 100/20 Mbps increased for almost all Tribal lands categories. From June 2024 to June 2025, service availability of Any Fixed Service at minimum speeds of 100/20 Mbps increased or remained at 100% for all Tribal lands categories. Fig. 2 Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services on Tribal Lands, 2023-2025 June 2023 Dec. 2023 June 2024 Dec. 2024 June 2025 Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Fixed Wireline Service Tribal Lands 2.907 70.8% 2.980 72.5% 3.053 73.4% 3.070 73.8% 3.102 74.6% Urban Areas 1.739 95.3% 1.753 96.0% 1.781 96.5% 1.772 96.0% 1.781 96.4% Rural Areas 1.167 51.1% 1.228 53.8% 1.271 54.9% 1.298 56.1% 1.321 57.1% Alaskan Villages 0.147 53.4% 0.153 55.4% 0.157 56.3% 0.159 57.1% 0.166 59.5% Urban Areas 0.085 89.5% 0.085 90.0% 0.086 90.1% 0.086 90.3% 0.091 95.6% Rural Areas 0.063 34.5% 0.068 37.3% 0.071 38.6% 0.073 39.8% 0.075 40.6% Federal Reservations 0.543 49.8% 0.569 52.2% 0.596 53.8% 0.611 55.1% 0.615 55.5% Urban Areas 0.226 81.3% 0.235 84.6% 0.245 87.1% 0.246 87.4% 0.246 87.3% Rural Areas 0.316 39.0% 0.334 41.2% 0.351 42.5% 0.364 44.1% 0.369 44.7% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.034 97.2% 0.034 97.3% 0.034 97.4% 0.034 98.1% 0.034 98.0% Urban Areas 0.026 99.9% 0.027 99.9% 0.027 99.9% 0.027 99.9% 0.027 100.0% Rural Areas 0.007 88.3% 0.007 88.6% 0.007 89.4% 0.008 92.3% 0.008 91.6% Tribal Statistical Areas 2.183 80.6% 2.224 82.1% 2.265 82.7% 2.266 82.8% 2.287 83.5% Urban Areas 1.402 98.3% 1.405 98.6% 1.423 98.8% 1.413 98.0% 1.417 98.1% Rural Areas 0.781 61.0% 0.818 63.8% 0.842 64.9% 0.853 65.8% 0.870 67.2% Fixed Terrestrial Service Tribal Lands 3.258 79.3% 3.394 82.6% 3.519 84.6% 3.599 86.5% 3.643 87.6% Urban Areas 1.774 97.2% 1.788 97.9% 1.817 98.5% 1.819 98.5% 1.832 99.1% Rural Areas 1.484 65.0% 1.606 70.3% 1.702 73.5% 1.780 76.9% 1.811 78.3% Alaskan Villages 0.173 62.5% 0.178 64.6% 0.185 66.4% 0.190 68.1% 0.198 71.0% Urban Areas 0.087 91.4% 0.087 92.0% 0.088 92.1% 0.088 92.3% 0.093 97.7% Rural Areas 0.086 47.4% 0.091 50.2% 0.097 53.0% 0.101 55.4% 0.105 57.1% Federal Reservations 0.656 60.2% 0.714 65.4% 0.762 68.8% 0.806 72.8% 0.833 75.2% Urban Areas 0.252 90.4% 0.258 92.9% 0.270 95.9% 0.272 96.4% 0.277 98.6% Rural Areas 0.405 49.9% 0.455 56.1% 0.492 59.6% 0.534 64.7% 0.556 67.2% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.034 97.2% 0.034 97.3% 0.034 97.4% 0.034 98.1% 0.034 98.0% Urban Areas 0.026 99.9% 0.027 99.9% 0.027 99.9% 0.027 99.9% 0.027 100.0% Rural Areas 0.007 88.3% 0.007 88.6% 0.007 89.4% 0.008 92.3% 0.008 91.7% Tribal Statistical Areas 2.395 88.5% 2.468 91.2% 2.538 92.7% 2.568 93.8% 2.577 94.1% Urban Areas 1.410 98.8% 1.416 99.3% 1.433 99.4% 1.432 99.3% 1.434 99.3% Rural Areas 0.986 76.9% 1.053 82.1% 1.106 85.3% 1.137 87.6% 1.143 88.3% Any Fixed Service Tribal Lands 4.103 99.9% 4.103 99.9% 4.154 99.9% 4.158 100.0% 4.156 99.9% Urban Areas 1.826 100.0% 1.826 100.0% 1.845 100.0% 1.845 100.0% 1.848 100.0% Rural Areas 2.277 99.8% 2.278 99.7% 2.309 99.7% 2.313 99.9% 2.308 99.8% Alaskan Villages 0.276 100.0% 0.276 100.0% 0.279 100.0% 0.279 100.0% 0.279 100.0% Urban Areas 0.095 100.0% 0.095 100.0% 0.096 100.0% 0.096 100.0% 0.096 100.0% Rural Areas 0.181 100.0% 0.181 100.0% 0.183 100.0% 0.183 100.0% 0.183 100.0% Federal Reservations 1.084 99.5% 1.085 99.5% 1.102 99.5% 1.106 99.9% 1.104 99.6% Urban Areas 0.278 100.0% 0.278 100.0% 0.282 100.0% 0.282 100.0% 0.281 100.0% Rural Areas 0.806 99.3% 0.807 99.3% 0.820 99.3% 0.825 99.8% 0.822 99.4% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.035 100.0% 0.035 100.0% 0.035 100.0% 0.035 100.0% 0.035 100.0% Urban Areas 0.026 100.0% 0.027 100.0% 0.027 100.0% 0.027 100.0% 0.027 100.0% Rural Areas 0.008 100.0% 0.008 100.0% 0.008 100.0% 0.008 100.0% 0.008 100.0% Tribal Statistical Areas 2.708 100.0% 2.708 100.0% 2.738 100.0% 2.738 100.0% 2.738 100.0% Urban Areas 1.427 100.0% 1.426 100.0% 1.441 100.0% 1.441 100.0% 1.444 100.0% Rural Areas 1.281 100.0% 1.282 100.0% 1.297 100.0% 1.297 100.0% 1.294 100.0% Pop. Evaluated 4.108 100.0% 4.109 100.0% 4.160 100.0% 4.159 100.0% 4.161 100.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BDC, Dec. 2024; FCC BDC, June 2024; FCC BDC, Dec. 2023; FCC BDC, June 2023; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. 33. Number of Fixed Service Providers. We examine the number of fixed broadband provider options available to consumers in the United States using FCC BDC service availability data at a minimum speed threshold of 100/20 Mbps. As of June 2025, there were 2,082 entities of varying sizes that reported making fixed broadband available to residential consumers at speeds exceeding 200 kbps in at least one direction. A broadband connection enables the end user to send and/or receive information over the internet at speeds of at least 200 kilobits per second. 47 CFR § 1.7001(a)(1). Accordingly, the BDC requires providers to report only those services where the speed exceeds this threshold. See BDC Data Specifications at 25. Figure 3 presents the total number of providers of fixed broadband services, as well as the number of providers of fixed broadband services in rural and urban areas, from June 2023 through June 2025. The total number of providers decreased by approximately 4% from June 2024 to June 2025. Figure 3 includes all fixed providers offering a residential service. Specifically, it may include broadband services delivered via Copper Wire, Cable Modem, and Optical Carrier; services delivered via terrestrial fixed wireless; and services delivered via satellite. The decline in the number of providers is higher in rural areas than in urban areas: between June 2024 and June 2025, the number of providers in rural areas and urban areas decreased by approximately 4% and approximately 2%, respectively. Fig. 3 Total Number of Providers of Fixed Services Over Time, 2023-2025 Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BDC, Dec.2024; FCC BDC, June 2024; FCC BDC, Dec. 2023; FCC BDC, June 2023; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. 34. While there are over 2,000 providers of residential services, there is considerable variation in provider size. The overwhelming majority of providers cover less than 1% of the U.S. population. In both June 2023 and June 2025, only 13 providers, three of which are satellite providers, reported making fixed broadband available to at least 5% of the U.S. population. Staff analysis of BDC data as of June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2025; Staff Population Estimates; 2020 Census. 35. Figure 4 reports estimates of the percentage of U.S. households in areas where zero, one, two, and three or more providers of fixed broadband are offering a 100/20 Mbps service. The percentage of households with an estimated number of fixed terrestrial provider options is measured as the number of households covered by the specific number of providers (e.g., zero, one, two, and at least three) divided by the total number of households. Throughout this section, percentages provided may not sum to exactly 100% due to rounding. As of June 2025, approximately 46% of households did not have more than one provider option for 100/20 Mbps Fixed Wireline Service, down from approximately 51% in June 2024. This decline from June 2024 to June 2025 highlights the increase in service availability of 100/20 Mbps service. In addition, in June 2025, approximately 23% of households did not have more than one provider option for Fixed Terrestrial Service, and approximately 3% did not have more than one provider option for Any Fixed Service. Fig. 4 Percentage of U.S. Households With Zero, One, Two, or At Least Three Provider Options for Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps, 2023-2025 Number of Providers June 2023 Dec. 2023 June 2024 Dec. 2024 June 2025 Fixed Wireline Service Zero 7.8% 7.1% 6.6% 6.1% 5.7% One 47.7% 46.4% 44.7% 42.7% 40.6% Two 38.7% 40.2% 41.7% 43.1% 44.3% Three or More 5.8% 6.2% 7.0% 8.1% 9.4% Fixed Terrestrial Service Zero 5.4% 4.7% 3.9% 3.4% 3.0% One 30.0% 28.3% 24.7% 22.2% 20.0% Two 36.8% 37.6% 35.6% 34.8% 33.6% Three or More 27.8% 29.4% 35.8% 39.5% 43.3% Any Fixed Service Zero 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% One 5.6% 4.8% 4.1% 3.5% 3.1% Two 30.0% 28.2% 24.7% 22.2% 20.0% Three or More 64.4% 66.9% 71.2% 74.3% 76.9% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BDC, Dec. 2024; FCC BDC, June 2024; FCC BDC, Dec. 2023; FCC BDC, June 2023; Staff Block Estimates. 36. We next evaluate the percentage of households that have a choice among multiple fixed broadband service providers in rural and urban areas, and on Tribal lands. As shown in Figure 5, as of June 2025, while approximately 62% of households in urban areas had at least two provider options for 100/20 Mbps Fixed Wireline Service, approximately 23% of households in rural areas and approximately 34% of households on Tribal lands had at least two options for this service. For Fixed Terrestrial Service at 100/20 Mbps, approximately 85% of households in urban areas had at least two options, compared to approximately 47% of households in rural areas and approximately 61% of households on Tribal lands. For Any Fixed Service at 100/20 Mbps, approximately 100% of households in urban areas had at least two options, compared to approximately 87% of households in rural areas and approximately 89% of households on Tribal lands. Over time, the share of households with multiple provider options at 100/20 Mbps service has been increasing. For example, in June 2024, approximately 57% of households in urban areas had at least two provider options for 100/20 Mbps Fixed Wireline Service, compared to approximately 62% of such households in June 2025. In June 2024, approximately 80% of households in urban areas had at least two provider options for 100/20 Mbps Fixed Terrestrial Service, whereas in June 2025, approximately 85% of such households had at least two provider options. In June 2024, approximately 99% of households in urban areas had at least two provider options for 100/20 Mbps Any Fixed Service, whereas in June 2025, approximately 100% of such households had at least two provider options. Fig. 5 Percentage of U.S. Households With Multiple Provider Options for Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps by Geography, 2023-2025 June 2023 Dec. 2023 June 2024 Dec. 2024 June 2025 Fixed Wireline Service - Urban Areas Zero 1.2% 1.2% 1.0% 1.1% 1.1% One 46.3% 44.3% 42.1% 39.6% 37.2% Two 45.4% 46.9% 48.3% 49.5% 50.5% Three or More 7.1% 7.6% 8.5% 9.8% 11.3% Fixed Wireline Service - Rural Areas Zero 32.2% 29.2% 27.3% 24.9% 23.3% One 53.1% 54.1% 54.0% 54.0% 53.4% Two 13.9% 15.6% 17.3% 19.2% 20.9% Three or More 0.8% 1.1% 1.4% 1.8% 2.4% Fixed Wireline Service - Tribal Areas Zero 27.4% 25.5% 24.7% 24.2% 23.6% One 49.6% 48.2% 46.7% 44.7% 42.4% Two 20.9% 23.0% 24.6% 26.2% 28.3% Three or More 2.0% 3.4% 4.0% 5.0% 5.6% Fixed Terrestrial Service - Urban Areas Zero 0.7% 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% One 25.5% 23.4% 19.7% 17.0% 14.7% Two 40.6% 41.2% 38.0% 36.8% 35.0% Three or More 33.2% 34.8% 41.8% 45.8% 49.9% Fixed Terrestrial Service - Rural Areas Zero 23.3% 19.9% 16.9% 14.7% 13.0% One 46.6% 46.2% 43.4% 41.6% 39.7% Two 22.5% 24.4% 26.4% 27.6% 28.4% Three or More 7.5% 9.5% 13.3% 16.1% 18.8% Fixed Terrestrial Service - Tribal Areas Zero 19.0% 15.6% 13.8% 12.1% 11.4% One 38.5% 36.4% 32.7% 29.8% 27.7% Two 27.0% 27.7% 26.2% 26.1% 26.6% Three or More 15.5% 20.3% 27.3% 32.0% 34.2% Any Fixed Service - Urban Areas Zero 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% One 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% Two 25.5% 23.4% 19.7% 17.0% 14.7% Three or More 73.6% 75.9% 79.7% 82.5% 84.8% Any Fixed Service - Rural Areas Zero 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% One 23.5% 20.0% 17.1% 14.9% 13.2% Two 46.5% 46.1% 43.3% 41.5% 39.7% Three or More 29.9% 33.8% 39.6% 43.6% 47.1% Any Fixed Service - Tribal Areas Zero 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% One 18.9% 15.5% 13.8% 12.1% 11.4% Two 38.5% 36.4% 32.7% 29.8% 27.7% Three or More 42.5% 48.1% 53.5% 58.1% 60.8% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BDC, Dec. 2024; FCC BDC, June 2024; FCC BDC, Dec. 2023; FCC BDC, June 2023; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. B. Mobile Broadband Service 1. Data Sources and Methodologies 37. We present estimates of mobile broadband availability based on FCC BDC data for June 2023, December 2023, June 2024, December 2024, and June 2025. The BDC has standardized certain factors that must be included in the mobile providers’ propagation modeling, including requiring maps that represent specified minimum speeds. Mobile broadband service providers submit separate coverage maps based upon standardized propagation modeling parameters for 3G, 4G LTE, and 5G-NR technologies. See BDC Data Specifications at 49-50. For example, for 5G-NR coverage, the BDC requires mobile broadband providers to submit coverage data that indicate where users should expect to receive minimum speeds of 35/3 Mbps with a cell edge probability of not less than 90% and cell loading of not less than 50%. See, e.g., Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection; Modernizing the FCC Form 477 Data Program, WC Docket Nos. 19-195 and 11-10, Second Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 35 FCC Rcd 7460, 7479, para. 44 (2020) (BDC Second Report and Order and Third Further Notice). The maps also “must account for terrain and clutter and use terrain and clutter data with a resolution of 100 meters or better.” 47 CFR § 1.7004(c)(3)(iii). The BDC also requires that a mobile provider report the assumptions that it relied on for its coverage modeling so that the Commission can better evaluate the modeled coverage. BDC Data Specifications at 55-57. Further, the BDC provides opportunities for consumers, State, local, and Tribal governmental entities, and other stakeholders to challenge the coverage and broadband service availability information reported to the FCC and depicted in the new maps. The Commission also has adopted verification and audit processes to ensure the data a mobile provider submits are accurate, and coverage areas can be substantiated. 2. Mobile Broadband Data 38. Figure 6 reports coverage for 5G-NR with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps. The analysis presented in Figure 6 includes the states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Territories. For additional analyses, see infra Appx. A-1 (reporting service availability of fixed services at 100/20 Mbps and mobile 5G-NR with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps by state, District of Columbia, and U.S. Territory); Appx. A-3 (reporting service availability of both fixed services at 100/20 Mbps and mobile 5G-NR with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps by state, District of Columbia, and U.S. Territory); and Appx. A-4 (reporting service availability of fixed services at 100/20 Mbps and mobile services at different speed tiers in the United States and U.S. territories). As of June 2025, approximately 95% of Americans lived in areas with 5G-NR coverage with minimum speeds of 35/3 Mbps, including approximately 79% of the population in rural areas, approximately 99% of the population in urban areas, and approximately 86% of the population in Tribal areas. From June 2024 to June 2025, service availability of mobile 5G-NR with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps increased in the United States overall, as well as in urban, rural, and Tribal areas. Fig. 6 Availability (Millions) of Mobile 5G-NR of at Least 35/3 Mbps, 2023-2025 The BDC requires filers to submit mobile broadband service availability coverage maps showing a minimum 90% cell edge probability of the designated speeds. BDC Data Specifications at 50. June 2023 Dec. 2023 June 2024 Dec. 2024 June 2025 Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % United States 314.760 93.0% 317.352 93.8% 324.065 94.3% 325.447 94.7% 327.140 95.2% Urban Areas 266.218 98.7% 266.673 98.9% 271.111 99.1% 271.393 99.2% 271.768 99.3% Rural Areas 48.541 70.5% 50.680 73.6% 52.954 75.6% 54.053 77.1% 55.372 79.0% Tribal Lands 3.241 78.9% 3.333 81.1% 3.488 83.8% 3.519 84.6% 3.562 85.6% Pop. Evaluated 338.489 100.0% 338.489 100.0% 343.683 100.0% 343.683 100.0% 343.683 100.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BDC, Dec. 2024; FCC BDC, June 2024; FCC BDC, Dec. 2023; FCC BDC, June 2023; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. 39. Figure 7 reports coverage for 5G-NR with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps on Tribal lands by major Tribal lands category, overall and also by rural and urban areas. As of June 2025, approximately 75% of Americans living on Tribal lands in rural areas have access to mobile 5G-NR at minimum speeds of 35/3 Mbps, while approximately 98% of Americans living on Tribal lands in urban areas have such access. From June 2024 to June 2025, service availability of mobile 5G-NR with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps increased in almost all major Tribal lands categories. Fig. 7 Availability (Millions) of Mobile 5G-NR of at Least 35/3 Mbps in Tribal Areas, 2023-2025 June 2023 Dec. 2023 June 2024 Dec. 2024 June 2025 Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Tribal Lands 3.241 78.9% 3.333 81.1% 3.488 83.8% 3.519 84.6% 3.562 85.6% Urban Areas 1.778 97.4% 1.778 97.4% 1.803 97.7% 1.807 97.9% 1.818 98.4% Rural Areas 1.463 64.1% 1.555 68.1% 1.685 72.8% 1.712 74.0% 1.743 75.4% Alaskan Villages 0.128 46.5% 0.143 51.6% 0.150 53.6% 0.133 47.7% 0.137 49.3% Urban Areas 0.068 71.7% 0.071 75.1% 0.073 76.4% 0.066 68.6% 0.069 72.2% Rural Areas 0.060 33.3% 0.071 39.3% 0.077 41.7% 0.067 36.8% 0.068 37.3% Federal Reservations 0.729 66.9% 0.745 68.3% 0.786 70.9% 0.810 73.2% 0.825 74.5% Urban Areas 0.271 97.3% 0.266 95.5% 0.271 96.1% 0.279 99.1% 0.280 99.4% Rural Areas 0.458 56.5% 0.479 59.0% 0.515 62.4% 0.531 64.3% 0.546 66.0% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.033 94.5% 0.033 94.5% 0.032 93.0% 0.033 93.1% 0.034 97.9% Urban Areas 0.026 99.0% 0.026 99.0% 0.025 94.0% 0.025 94.1% 0.027 99.9% Rural Areas 0.007 80.1% 0.007 79.7% 0.007 89.7% 0.007 89.9% 0.008 91.4% Tribal Statistical Areas 2.351 86.8% 2.412 89.1% 2.520 92.0% 2.543 92.9% 2.564 93.7% Urban Areas 1.414 99.1% 1.414 99.2% 1.434 99.5% 1.437 99.7% 1.442 99.9% Rural Areas 0.937 73.2% 0.998 77.9% 1.086 83.7% 1.106 85.3% 1.122 86.7% Pop. Evaluated 4.108 100.0% 4.109 100.0% 4.160 100.0% 4.159 100.0% 4.161 100.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BDC, Dec. 2024; FCC BDC, June 2024; FCC BDC, Dec. 2023; FCC BDC, June 2023; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. 40. Number of Mobile Service Providers. As of June 30, 2025, there were three nationwide facilities-based providers of mobile broadband services. Besides the nationwide providers, there are many regional and smaller local facilities-based providers offering service in a few geographical areas. Many Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs), including cable providers, also offer mobile broadband services. MVNOs are wireless service providers that sell mobile services under their own brand but lease capacity from facilities-based mobile providers because they do not own their own mobile network. While cable MVNOs account for a growing share of industry gross adds, Jeff Baumgartner, Light Reading, With 18M Mobile Lines, Cables Still ‘Biggest Headwind’ for AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon (Mar. 14, 2025), https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/with-18m-mobile-lines-cable-still-biggest-headwind-for-at-t-t-mobile-and-verizon. they are not separately identified in the BDC data, however, and are thus not separately addressed in our analysis. MVNOs are not captured in the BDC data because they are not Commission licensees and typically do not file section 214 applications. 2024 Communications Marketplace Report, 39 FCC Rcd at 14161, para. 58 & n.142. 41. Figure 8 presents 5G-NR coverage by the number of facilities-based service providers. As of June 2025, approximately 95% of the population, approximately 69% of road miles, and approximately 39% of square miles were covered by at least one 5G-NR service provider at advertised speeds of 35/3 Mbps. In contrast, approximately 88% of the population, approximately 50% of road miles, and approximately 20% of square miles were covered by at least two 5G-NR service providers. Finally, approximately 74% of the population, approximately 32% of road miles, and approximately 8% of square miles were covered by at least three 5G-NR service providers. Fig. 8 Provider Options for Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps (June 30, 2025) One or More Providers Two or More Providers Three or More Providers Population (millions) 95.2% 87.8% 73.8% Urban Areas 99.4% 96.3% 85.6% Rural Areas 79.7% 56.2% 30.1% Tribal Lands 85.7% 70.0% 49.3% Roads (thousands of miles) 69.2% 49.5% 32.1% Urban Areas 99.0% 95.1% 83.5% Rural Areas 59.5% 34.7% 15.3% Tribal Lands 55.9% 33.7% 15.9% Area (millions of square miles) 39.2% 20.3% 8.4% Urban Areas 98.2% 92.0% 76.6% Rural Areas 37.5% 18.2% 6.4% Tribal Lands 37.6% 17.6% 6.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. C. Fixed and Mobile Broadband Service 42. Figure 9 shows service availability of fixed services with speeds of at least 100/20 Mbps and 5G-NR mobile broadband service with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps. We present additional service availability data for fixed terrestrial and/or mobile broadband services in the appendices. See infra Appx. A-1 (reporting service availability of fixed services at 100/20 Mbps and mobile 5G-NR with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps by state, District of Columbia, and U.S. Territory); Appx. A-3 (reporting service availability of both fixed services at 100/20 Mbps and mobile 5G-NR with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps by state, District of Columbia, and U.S. Territory); and Appx. A-4 (reporting service availability of fixed services at 100/20 Mbps and mobile services at different speed tiers in the United States and U.S. territories). As of June 2025, approximately 91% of Americans had access to both Fixed Wireline Service with speeds of at least 100/20 Mbps and 5G-NR mobile broadband service with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps. Approximately 93% of Americans had access to Fixed Terrestrial Service with speeds of at least 100/20 Mbps and 5G-NR mobile broadband service with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps as of June 2025. Approximately 95% of Americans had access to Any Fixed Service with speeds of at least 100/20 Mbps and 5G-NR mobile broadband service with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps as of June 2025. As of June 2025, while approximately 98% of Americans living in urban areas had access to Fixed Wireline Service at 100/20 Mbps and mobile 5G-NR service at 35/3 Mbps, approximately 61% of Americans living in rural areas had access to such services. In addition, approximately 99% of Americans living in urban areas had access to Fixed Terrestrial Service at 100/20 Mbps and mobile 5G-NR service at 35/3 Mbps, while approximately 71% of Americans living in rural areas had access to such services. Approximately 99% of Americans living in urban areas had access to Any Fixed Service at 100/20 Mbps and mobile 5G-NR service at 35/3 Mbps, while approximately 79% of Americans living in rural areas had access to such services. The share of Americans living in areas with access to Fixed Wireline Service at 100/20 Mbps and mobile 5G-NR service at 35/3 Mbps has increased from approximately 89% in June 2024 to approximately 91% in June 2025. Similarly, the share of Americans living in areas with access to Fixed Terrestrial Service at 100/20 Mbps and mobile 5G-NR service at 35/3 Mbps has increased from approximately 92% in June 2024 to approximately 93% in June 2025. The share of Americans living in areas with access to Any Fixed Service at 100/20 Mbps and mobile 5G-NR service at 35/3 Mbps has increased from approximately 94% in June 2024 to approximately 95% in June 2025. For data regarding the availability of fixed services with speeds of at least 100/20 Mbps and 5G-NR broadband with a minimum speed of 35/3 Mbps on Tribal lands, see Appx. A-6. In addition, Appendices A-7 through A-11 report service availability of both fixed services at 100/20 Mbps and mobile services at various speed tiers on Tribal lands. Fig. 9 Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps, 2023-2025 June 2023 Dec. 2023 June 2024 Dec. 2024 June 2025 Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Fixed Wireline Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service United States 296.861 87.7% 300.199 88.7% 306.795 89.3% 308.763 89.8% 311.014 90.5% Urban Areas 262.259 97.3% 263.059 97.6% 267.575 97.8% 267.700 97.8% 268.222 98.0% Rural Areas 34.601 50.2% 37.139 53.9% 39.221 56.0% 41.062 58.6% 42.792 61.1% Tribal Lands 2.573 62.6% 2.686 65.4% 2.798 67.3% 2.822 67.8% 2.869 69.0% Fixed Terrestrial Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service United States 303.594 89.7% 307.369 90.8% 315.423 91.8% 317.791 92.5% 320.282 93.2% Urban Areas 264.059 97.9% 264.804 98.2% 269.529 98.5% 269.940 98.7% 270.537 98.9% Rural Areas 39.535 57.4% 42.565 61.8% 45.894 65.5% 47.851 68.3% 49.745 71.0% Tribal Lands 2.820 68.6% 3.000 73.0% 3.175 76.3% 3.251 78.1% 3.312 79.6% Any Fixed Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service United States 314.702 93.0% 317.306 93.7% 324.041 94.3% 325.434 94.7% 327.125 95.2% Urban Areas 266.191 98.7% 266.654 98.9% 271.107 99.1% 271.392 99.2% 271.766 99.3% Rural Areas 48.511 70.4% 50.652 73.5% 52.934 75.5% 54.042 77.1% 55.359 79.0% Tribal Lands 3.240 78.9% 3.332 81.1% 3.488 83.8% 3.519 84.6% 3.561 85.6% Pop. Evaluated 338.489 100.0% 338.489 100.0% 343.683 100.0% 343.683 100.0% 343.683 100.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BDC, Dec. 2024; FCC BDC, June 2024; FCC BDC, Dec. 2023; FCC BDC, June 2023; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. D. Broadband Funding Data 43. As required by the Infrastructure Act, the Commission has established an online mapping of “each broadband infrastructure deployment project funded by the Federal Government.” Infrastructure Act § 60105(b), 135 Stat. at 1206. The Commission published the Broadband Funding Map (BFM) on May 15, 2023. See FCC Releases Broadband Funding Map, WC Docket Nos. 11-10 and 19-195, Public Notice, 38 FCC Rcd 4315 (OEA/WCB 2023). The BFM is a publicly available resource that identifies locations funded not just by the Commission, but also by the Appalachian Regional Commission, the U.S. Department of Treasury, the USDA’s Rural Utilities Service, and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). 44. The granular availability data collected as part of the BDC, combined with these new data identifying broadband infrastructure deployment projects from the BFM allow us to estimate the population with broadband availability, as well as the population that is currently without broadband availability and living in areas with funding commitments. Notably, the BFM does not yet include all of the funding commitments made as part of NTIA’s Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program. This grant program, funded by the Infrastructure Act, authorized a historic federal investment of $42.45 billion dollars to connect every American to the Internet. See Infrastructure Act § 60102(b)(2), 135 Stat. at 1184. 45. Figure 10 incorporates data from both the BDC and the BFM to identify how much of the population without access to a Fixed Terrestrial Service of at least 100/20 Mbps is currently subject to enforceable funding commitments from various federal programs, as of June 2025. Because BEAD funding awards are not reflected in the version of the BFM used in the analysis, BEAD data are not included in Figures 10 and 11. First, BDC data are used to identify the approximately 3% of the U.S. population that does not currently have access to a Fixed Terrestrial Service of at least 100/20 Mbps. Incorporating data from the BFM, we can further show that approximately 1% of the U.S. population—that is, approximately 32% of the total unserved population—reside in locations that do not have access to Fixed Terrestrial Service of at least 100/20 Mbps but are currently subject to enforceable funding commitments. This implies that, as of June 2025, approximately 2% of the U.S. population, or approximately 68% of the total unserved population, are in areas without access to a Fixed Terrestrial Service broadband provider offering at least 100/20 Mbps and where there is currently no funding directly committed from the federal agencies listed above. That approximate 2% figure, however, is likely a meaningful over-statement of locations that lack both funding and service for several reasons: in addition to the general expansion of broadband coverage since June 2025, it does not reflect federally supported buildouts reported more recently, including data from BEAD. Fig. 10 Population Without Access to a Fixed Terrestrial Service of at Least 100/20 Mbps With Enforceable Funding Commitments, June 30, 2025 Pop. % United States 343,683,456 100.0% 1 or More Fixed Broadband Options 333,102,362 96.9% No Fixed Broadband Option 10,581,094 3.1% Funding Committed 3,394,105 1.0% No Funding Directly Committed in the BFM (as of November 23, 2025) 7,186,989 2.1% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BFM, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. 46. Figure 11 shows the population without Fixed Terrestrial Service of at least 100/200 Mbps, as well as each of the funding programs reported in the BFM and the population that each program will bring online. Approximately 32% of the population without access to Fixed Terrestrial Service of at least 100/20 Mbps live in locations with an enforceable funding commitment listed in the BFM. Notably, for the dataset analyzed, which excludes BEAD, the Commission’s Rural Digital Opportunity Fund accounts for almost half of these locations. The second largest program is the Capital Projects Fund sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which funds projects covering approximately 21% of the locations with an enforceable funding commitment listed in the BFM. Fig. 11 Population Without Access to a Fixed Terrestrial Service of at Least 100/20 Mbps With Enforceable Funding Commitments by Program, June 30, 2025 Pop. % No Funding Committed 7,186,989 67.9% Funding Committed 3,394,105 32.1% Area Development 1,222 0.0% Bringing Puerto Rico Together Fund 33,119 0.3% Broadband Infrastructure Program 22,360 0.2% Capital Projects Fund 723,297 6.8% Community Connect Grant Program 9,643 0.1% Connect America Fund (CAF) Phase II 104,925 1.0% Connect USVI Fund 230 0.0% Enhanced Alternative Connect America Cost Model 452,442 4.3% POWER Initiative 1,538 0.0% Rural Digital Opportunity Fund 1,631,642 15.4% Rural eConnectivity Program 295,343 2.8% State And Local Fiscal Recovery Fund 142,813 1.3% Telephone Loan Program 35,861 0.3% Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program NOFO 1 68,712 0.6% Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program NOFO 2 15,376 0.1% Unserved Pop. Evaluated 10,581,094 100.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BFM, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. E. Schools and Classrooms 47. The Commission previously relied on Connect K-12’s annual report that reported on the percentage of school districts that met the 1 Gbps per 1,000 students benchmark; however, Connect K-12 stopped publishing the Connect K-12 Report in 2023. Connect K-12 Funding Year 2021 Report; Connected Nation, 2023 Report on School Connectivity, at 5 (2023), https://connectk12.org/static/media/Connect_K12_Connectivity_Report_2023_FINAL.dfc96770.pdf (2023 Connect K-12 Report) (stating that Connect K-12 would no longer produce an official report). The 2023 Connect K-12 report analysis is based publicly available E-Rate program data. See generally Universal Service Administrative Company, E-Rate Datasets, https://opendata.usac.org/browse?category=E-Rate (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). For consistency, Commission staff closely reviewed the methodological approach used in the report and were able to closely approximate Connect K-12’s measure, which found that 74% of school districts met the Commission’s 1 Gbps per 1,000 students benchmark in 2023. Connect K-12 Report at 6. Using their approach, we find that approximately 78% of entities met the 1 Gbps per 1,000 student threshold in 2024, up from 74% in 2023. Staff analysis of FCC Form 471 data. 48. The Commission also prepared its own analytical approach using data collected through the E-Rate program to assess progress toward meeting the short-term benchmark. Id. See, e.g., Universal Service Administrative Company, E-Rate Recipient Details and Commitments, https://opendata.usac.org/E-Rate/E-Rate-Recipient-Details-And-Commitments/avi8-svp9/about_data (last visited Aug. 11, 2026) (including information regarding bandwidths purchased by schools, district, and consortia, and student count). The Commission’s metric is conceptually aligned to that of Connect K-12, but with key differences on what the unit of analysis is. Connect K-12’s measure was at the school district level while the Commission’s measure examines the bandwidth per student. This means Connect K-12’s measure was capturing the share of school districts that meet the threshold of 1 Gbps per 1,000 students. The Commission’s measure better reflects the impact of the E-Rate program by matching students to the actual services they receive by capturing the share of students that have at least 1 Gbps per 1,000 students, or 1 Mbps per student. We agree with INCOMPAS that E-Rate program data “provides a reliable foundation for tracking progress.” INCOMPAS Comments at 13. Commenters suggested that other data sources, including the State Educational Technology Directors Association’s Universal Connectivity Imperative, 2024 National Educational Technology Plan, Funds For Learning’s 2024 E-Rate affordability analysis, New America’s 2024 broadband equity research, and Rural Health Care Program data, would provide useful reference points. ALA & SHLB Comments at 4; INCOMPAS Comments at 13. These sources are not sufficiently comprehensive for measuring progress toward the short-term benchmark, and therefore were not used in our analysis. To measure progress specifically by percentage of students, Commission staff used FCC Form 471 data to create a measure of bandwidth divided by students at the school level. Staff analysis of FCC Form 471 data (relying on the descriptions of services ordered as well as student counts for each entity that receives service). The unit of analysis is the final recipient entity, which is generally a single school or a single building within a school district. To allocate bandwidth across recipients (e.g., a district with multiple schools), we multiply the total bandwidth for each line item by the proportion of students associated with each recipient. This ensures that bandwidth is distributed proportionally based on student share for each recipient and avoids double counting. Services were restricted to connections between applicants and internet service providers or state/regional network. This restriction narrows the observations to only those where a school is receiving a connection outside of its network. While dark fiber and support connections to a school, library, or non-instructional facility (NIF) are important to the overall network capabilities of a school, Commission staff restricted the bandwidth measure to connections that are directly accessible to the end user at the school. For each recipient entity, we divided the total download bandwidth by the number of full-time students. If a recipient entity was included in multiple applications, a portion of each application’s bandwidth was allocated based on student count in an application. If a recipient entity’s bandwidth was greater than or equal to 1 Mbps per student, we treated the entity as meeting the 1 Gbps per 1,000 students benchmark. To calculate the overall totals, we summed the number of students at entities with bandwidth of at least 1 Mbps per student and divided this by the total number of students in each funding year to determine the share of students that were at schools meeting the benchmark. 49. Based on this analysis, we find that in 2025, 52% of students had access to connectivity of at least 1 Mbps per student. Figure 12 below shows the percentage of students in each funding year that had access to connectivity that met the benchmark between 2021 and 2025. Between 2021 and 2025, there was an approximately 63% increase in the percentage of students who met the Commission’s benchmark. Additionally, based on this analysis, there were 32 states where at least 50% of the students had access to connectivity that met this benchmark in 2025. Fig. 12 Percent of Students With at Least 1 Mbps Per Student Over Time, 2020-2025 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Overall 32% 33% 37% 44% 52% Urban 31% 31% 35% 42% 50% Rural 35% 39% 43% 51% 55% Source: FCC Form 471 Data, Funding Years 2018-2025. F. Demographic Information 50. Section 706(c) directs the Commission to determine, for geographical areas without access to advanced telecommunications capabilities, the population, population density, and the average per capita income. 47 U.S.C. § 1302(c). To determine demographic information for unserved areas, we aggregate the served and unserved populations from all BSLs within a particular Census block group. We use this level of aggregation because it is the smallest geography for which the average per capita income data are available. For this information, we rely on the 2020-2024 American Community Survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau. See U.S. Census Bureau, Press Kit: 2020-2024 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-kits/2026/acs-5-year-estimates.html (last visited Aug 11, 2026). This survey is only conducted in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Accordingly, the tables in this section do not include populations in other U.S. territories. We include a demographic data analysis below and show the service availability of advanced telecommunications capability on a county-by-county basis with demographic information in Appendix A-5. We do not present statistics on the availability of satellite services at the county level. As discussed above, satellite providers report availability of a 100/20 Mbps service to approximately 99.7% of the population. Further, we estimate satellite services are available to at least 99% of the population in 3,209 of 3,231 populated counties. 51. Figure 13 presents a demographic analysis of the average percentage of households with coverage by zero, one, two, and three or more providers at the speed benchmark of 100/20 Mbps, We include only census block groups for which we have complete data. For a given quartile of census block groups, we assign each household to a provider count category based on the number of providers that report making service available to that location, aggregate the number of households in each provider county category across all census block groups in the given quartile, and divide that sum by the total number of households across all census block groups in the quartile. Average per capita income is measured in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Population density is the total population residing in the census block group as of 2025 divided by the square miles of land in the census block group, with the estimate of land area based on the 2020 Census. broken out by population quartile, population density quartile, and average per capita income quartile as well as last-mile technology used to deliver the service. We observe that the number of provider options generally increases with each of these three factors. In general, the census block groups in rural areas will tend to have the lowest population density and are likely to have the largest percentage of the households with zero provider options, that is, no service availability of the reported service. Fig. 13 Average Percentage of Households With Zero, One, Two, or at Least Three Provider Options for 100/20 Mbps Fixed Services, by Census Block Group (June 30, 2025) Zero One Two Three or More Population - Fixed Wireline Service First Quartile (Lowest Population) 8.4% 42.5% 40.1% 9.1% Second Quartile 6.8% 40.6% 43.1% 9.5% Third Quartile 5.5% 41.3% 43.9% 9.2% Fourth Quartile (Highest Population) 4.3% 39.4% 46.7% 9.5% Population - Fixed Terrestrial Service First Quartile (Lowest Population) 4.9% 22.1% 31.2% 41.8% Second Quartile 3.8% 20.6% 32.5% 43.2% Third Quartile 2.9% 20.2% 33.8% 43.0% Fourth Quartile (Highest Population) 2.0% 18.7% 35.1% 44.2% Population - Any Fixed Service First Quartile (Lowest Population) 0.0% 5.0% 22.1% 72.9% Second Quartile 0.0% 4.0% 20.5% 75.5% Third Quartile 0.0% 3.1% 20.2% 76.7% Fourth Quartile (Highest Population) 0.0% 2.1% 18.8% 79.1% Population Density - Fixed Wireline Service First Quartile (Lowest Density) 20.9% 53.1% 23.1% 2.9% Second Quartile 1.6% 40.4% 48.0% 10.0% Third Quartile 0.7% 33.6% 52.4% 13.3% Fourth Quartile (Highest Density) 0.9% 36.1% 52.1% 10.9% Population Density - Fixed Terrestrial Service First Quartile (Lowest Density) 11.7% 38.0% 29.0% 21.2% Second Quartile 0.6% 18.3% 36.3% 44.8% Third Quartile 0.2% 13.1% 34.8% 51.8% Fourth Quartile (Highest Density) 0.2% 11.6% 33.9% 54.3% Population Density - Any Fixed Service First Quartile (Lowest Density) 0.0% 11.9% 38.0% 50.1% Second Quartile 0.0% 0.8% 18.3% 80.9% Third Quartile 0.0% 0.3% 13.1% 86.6% Fourth Quartile (Highest Density) 0.0% 0.2% 11.7% 88.1% Average Per Capita Income ($2024) - Fixed Wireline Service First Quartile (Lowest Income) 6.1% 45.1% 41.3% 7.5% Second Quartile 7.9% 42.1% 41.0% 9.0% Third Quartile 6.3% 40.3% 43.7% 9.7% Fourth Quartile (Highest Income) 2.9% 36.0% 50.2% 10.9% Average Per Capita Income ($2024) - Fixed Terrestrial Service First Quartile (Lowest Income) 3.4% 21.1% 33.1% 42.4% Second Quartile 4.4% 22.4% 33.3% 39.9% Third Quartile 3.2% 20.8% 33.9% 42.1% Fourth Quartile (Highest Income) 1.3% 16.2% 34.1% 48.4% Average Per Capita Income ($2024) - Any Fixed Service First Quartile (Lowest Income) 0.0% 3.4% 21.1% 75.4% Second Quartile 0.0% 4.6% 22.4% 73.1% Third Quartile 0.0% 3.4% 20.8% 75.8% Fourth Quartile (Highest Income) 0.0% 1.4% 16.2% 82.4% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS Five-Year Estimates for 2020-2024. 52. In Figure 14, we present the average percentage of the population with availability of fixed and mobile services across quartiles of population, population density, and average per capita income at the census block group level. On average, availability of all services other than Any Fixed Service, which includes satellite service, is higher in census block groups with higher populations, population densities, and average per capita incomes. Fig. 14 Average Percentage of Population With Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps, by Census Block Group (June 30, 2025) Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Mobile 5G-NR Service Population First Quartile (Lowest Population) 91.3% 95.1% 100.0% 91.9% Second Quartile 93.0% 96.2% 100.0% 93.7% Third Quartile 94.3% 97.1% 100.0% 95.2% Fourth Quartile (Highest Population) 94.9% 97.7% 100.0% 97.0% Population Density First Quartile (Lowest Density) 78.0% 88.1% 100.0% 80.9% Second Quartile 97.9% 99.1% 100.0% 98.5% Third Quartile 99.0% 99.6% 100.0% 99.7% Fourth Quartile (Highest Density) 98.9% 99.7% 100.0% 99.9% Average Per Capita Income ($2024) First Quartile (Lowest Income) 92.9% 96.3% 100.0% 95.3% Second Quartile 92.2% 95.8% 100.0% 93.3% Third Quartile 93.7% 96.9% 100.0% 95.0% Fourth Quartile (Highest Income) 97.0% 98.7% 100.0% 97.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS Five-Year Estimates for 2020-2024. 53. Figure 15 presents an analysis of the percentage of the population served by both fixed services of at least 100/20 Mbps and mobile 5G-NR broadband of at least 35/3 Mbps, broken out by population quartile, population density quartile, and average per capita income quartile. Appendices A-12 through A-16 present analyses of the percentage of the population served by both fixed services of at least 100/20 Mbps and mobile services at various speed tiers. We observe that, on average, the percentage of population served increases as population, population density, and average per capita income increase. Fig. 15 Average Percentage of Population With Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps, by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) Mobile 5G-NR and Fixed Wireline Service Mobile 5G-NR and Fixed Terrestrial Service Mobile 5G-NR and Any Fixed Service Population First Quartile (Lowest Population) 85.9% 89.2% 91.9% Second Quartile 88.7% 91.5% 93.7% Third Quartile 90.8% 93.2% 95.1% Fourth Quartile (Highest Population) 92.6% 95.2% 97.0% Population Density First Quartile (Lowest Density) 64.9% 73.7% 80.9% Second Quartile 96.5% 97.7% 98.5% Third Quartile 98.7% 99.4% 99.7% Fourth Quartile (Highest Density) 98.8% 99.6% 99.9% Average Per Capita Income ($2024) First Quartile (Lowest Income) 89.7% 92.8% 95.3% Second Quartile 87.5% 90.7% 93.3% Third Quartile 90.1% 93.0% 95.0% Fourth Quartile (Highest Income) 94.5% 96.1% 97.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS Five-Year Estimates for 2020-2024. 54. Figure 16 compares the demographic characteristics across areas that do and do not have access to both fixed services of at least 100/20 Mbps and 5G-NR mobile broadband service of at least 35/3 Mbps. Appendices A-17 through A-21 compare the demographic characteristics across areas that do and do not have access to both fixed services of at least 100/20 Mbps and mobile services at various speed tiers. On average, we find that served areas have higher populations, population densities, and average per capita incomes. Fig. 16 Comparison of Demographic Data Between Areas With and Without Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps, by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) Population Population Density Per Capita Income ($2024) United States - Fixed Wireline Services and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,452.2*** 7,535.2*** $43,521.37*** Unserved 1,291.0 296.0 $39,938.89 United States - Fixed Terrestrial Services and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,453.7*** 7,848.5*** $43,800.79*** Unserved 1,317.2 531.6 $39,555.35 United States - Any Fixed Services and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,449.8*** 8,083.4*** $44,139.61*** Unserved 1,354.6 1,263.2 $39,373.87 Urban Areas - Fixed Wireline Services and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,464.0*** 8,272.2*** $44,090.90*** Unserved 1,550.7 1,425.9 $54,548.94 Urban Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,463.3*** 8,387.6*** $44,229.50*** Unserved 1,528.0 2,175.9 $48,014.26 Urban Areas - Any Fixed Services and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,458.2*** 8,457.5*** $44,460.82 Unserved 1,549.7 4,116.1 $44,117.40 Rural Areas - Fixed Wireline Services and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,337.4*** 380.6*** $37,982.90*** Unserved 1,244.0 91.3 $37,327.47 Rural Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,321.7*** 463.9*** $37,917.66** Unserved 1,262.6 106.1 $37,443.17 Rural Areas - Any Fixed Services and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,281.8 587.4*** $37,691.71 Unserved 1,276.3 118.6 $37,534.51 Tribal Areas - Fixed Wireline Services and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,283.7 1,851.9*** $33,415.19*** Unserved 1,256.8 129.5 $30,995.02 Tribal Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,283.8 2,056.8*** $33,906.31*** Unserved 1,261.4 188.3 $30,829.67 Tribal Areas - Any Fixed Service and Mobile 5G-NR Served 1,262.8 2,450.1*** $34,226.48*** Unserved 1,282.2 269.9 $31,212.49 Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS Five-Year Estimates for 2020-2024. Note: We test for a statistical difference in the reported means between areas with and without availability of these services. We consider a block group to be served if at least 95% of the population in that block group has access to both, fixed and mobile services. The level of statistical significance is indicated by the number of stars. The absence of a star indicates no statistical difference between the reported figures at the 90% confidence level or above. * signifies statistical significance at a 90% level of confidence, ** signifies statistical significance at a 95% level of confidence, and *** signifies statistical significance at a 99% level of confidence. V. COMMISSION EFFORTS TO CLOSE THE DIGITAL DIVIDE A. Measuring Broadband Deployment and Policy Development and Coordination 55. The Commission needs reliable data and impactful input from experienced stakeholders in order to develop policies that close the digital divide. The National Broadband Map helps serve that purpose, and several important coordination efforts have contributed to the Commission’s ability to continue to gather information on evolving issues. 56. The National Broadband Map and Broadband Data Collection. The National Broadband Map is the most comprehensive, granular, and standardized data the Commission has ever made available on broadband availability. To populate broadband availability in the Map, the Commission established the BDC, which implements the iterative data collection and challenge processes envisioned by the Broadband DATA Act. Broadband Deployment Accuracy and Technological Availability Act, Pub. L. No. 116-130, 134 Stat. 228 (2020) (codified at 47 U.S.C. §§ 641-646) (Broadband DATA Act). The Broadband DATA Act allows service providers to report their fixed broadband availability on a location-by-location or area basis and to report their mobile and fixed wireless broadband availability coverage areas using standardized propagation modeling parameters. 47 U.S.C. §§ 641-646; BDC Second Report and Order and Third Further Notice, 35 FCC Rcd at 7474-83, paras. 24-51 (establishing the processes and parameters by which fixed wireless and mobile providers would submit propagation maps to the Commission); see also FCC, About the National Broadband Map, https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/about. Providers first reported their broadband availability data as of June 30, 2022 in the initial BDC collection window, and the Commission published the first version of the National Broadband Map in November of 2022. Broadband Data Task Force Releases Pre-Production Draft of the National Broadband Map; Announces the Start of the Broadband Availability Challenge Processes, WC Docket Nos. 11-10 and 19-195, Public Notice, 37 FCC Rcd 13348 (WCB/WTB/OEA 2022). The Commission collects updated broadband availability data from providers biannually and continues to publish new versions of the Map twice per year, with data reflecting updates and corrections published roughly biweekly. 47 U.S.C. § 642(a)(1)(A); 47 CFR § 1.7004(b). So far, the Commission has published eight iterations of the National Broadband Map. The latest iteration of the Map shows data as of December 2025. See FCC, National Broadband Map, https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov. This Report relies on providers’ BDC coverage data as of June 30, 2025, with revisions through December 30, 2025. 57. Understanding the importance of accurate and reliable location-specific data to identify and target broadband investment to areas that need it most, the Commission implemented a challenge process for the BDC that allows consumers and other stakeholders to challenge the data reported by providers. Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection, Modernizing the FCC Form 477 Data Program, WC Docket Nos. 19-195 and 11-10, Third Report and Order, 36 FCC Rcd 1126, 1154-74, paras. 70-124 (2021). Commission staff adjudicate challenges and conduct verifications and audits of provider availability data, which have resulted in significant updates to submissions from providers and a clearer picture of broadband availability in states and territories. The results of challenges, Commission-initiated verification and audit efforts, and corrections from providers all contribute to a more accurate picture of broadband availability. FCC, About the National Broadband Map, https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/about. 58. Since the 2024 Report, the Commission has continued to focus on accuracy while also endeavoring to streamline the reporting and challenge processes and reduce regulatory burdens associated with the BDC. Specifically, in June 2025, the Commission eliminated the mandatory licensed professional engineer requirement for BDC filings. Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection, Modernizing the FCC Form 477 Data Program, WC Docket Nos. 19-195 and 11-10, Fifth Report and Order, 40 FCC Rcd 4681, 4681-82, para. 3 (2025) (BDC Fifth Report and Order). To ensure that the Commission receives reliable data, the updated rules require certification by a qualified engineer who is familiar with the design of the network and has a minimum number of years of experience. BDC Fifth Report and Order, 40 FCC Rcd at 4684-85, para. 9; see also Press Release, FCC, FCC Eliminates Administrative Burden for Broadband Data Filers; Broadband Availability Data Submissions No Longer Impeded by an Unnecessary Accreditation Requirement (June 26, 2025), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-412450A1.pdf. By eliminating this requirement, the Commission better aligns BDC rules with market realities while ensuring that the Commission continues to receive accurate data from filers. 59. In addition, the Commission adopted new rules in May 2026 that further alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens on providers while ensuring that the Commission continues to receive accurate, granular data on broadband availability. Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection et al., WC Docket No. 11-10 et al., Sixth Report and Order and Fifth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 26-33 (May 21, 2026). The Commission also sought comment on further ways to eliminate regulatory burdens and streamline the BDC rules through possibly changing the broadband coverage restoration process; eliminating reporting on grandfathered and low-speed fixed services; eliminating fixed maximum buffer size reporting requirements; relaxing antenna height requirements for fixed wireless services; ending legacy data collections for mobile services; encouraging the use of infrastructure data in response to fixed challenges; streamlining the fixed challenge process timelines; adopting mobile challenge and crowdsource process improvements; and streamlining the confidential treatment of certain sensitive data reported in the BDC. Id. at 11-36, paras. 27-95. Specifically, the Commission: (1) aligned reporting requirements so that the FCC Form 477 will use the same definition of broadband as the BDC; (2) eliminated the requirement that challenges to locations in the Fabric be shared with service providers; and (3) removed the obligation of providers to update their availability data after adverse audit and verification results. Id. at 3-5, 7-10, paras. 7-10, 15-23. The Commission also declined to adopt a proposal to require additional certifications and supporting data from satellite providers as part of their BDC submissions. Id. at 5-7, paras. 11-14. 60. Interagency Information Sharing and Coordination. Recognizing the importance of a comprehensive approach to federal broadband funding, Commission staff have been engaging in extensive coordination with other agencies pertaining to broadband funding programs. Through the use of the FCC broadband maps and interagency agreements to share program data, the relevant federal agencies have adopted and refined coordination practices necessary for effectively administering their respective broadband funding programs. On May 12, 2022, the Commission, USDA, NTIA, and the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) announced an interagency Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), which provides that the agencies will consult with one another and share information on data collected from programs administered by the Commission and USDA’s Rural Utilities Service, programs administered or coordinated by NTIA, and Treasury’s Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund and the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. The agencies also agreed to “develop consistent, complementary, and, to the extent possible, uniform formats, standards, protocols, and reporting processes” for data collection and to make data related to funded projects publicly available. Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Information Sharing, dated as of May 9, 2022, between the Federal Communications Commission, U.S. Department of Agriculture, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce, and the U.S. Department of the Treasury at 1, § 1 (May 11, 2022), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-383278A1.pdf; see also Press Release, Federal Communications Commission, FCC, NTIA, USDA and Treasury Announce Interagency Agreement to Collaborate on Federal Broadband Funding (May 12, 2022), https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-ntia-usda-treasury-announce-broadband-info-sharing-agreement. In May 2024, the agencies renewed this MOU for an additional four-year period through May 9, 2028. Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Information Sharing, dated as of May 9, 2024, between the Federal Communications Commission, U.S. Department of Agriculture, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce, and the U.S. Department of the Treasury, at 2-3. § 9, https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-404166A1.pdf. The agencies coordinate to identify potential duplicative funding of broadband deployment, and to discuss amendments to these existing enforceable commitments by participating awardees with the goal to prevent overlapping funding. In instances where an awardee is unable to fulfill its broadband deployment commitments, the agencies work to further ensure an alternative broadband funding source is available so that broadband will be made available to everyone, everywhere. 61. Effective distribution of unprecedented broadband funding by the Commission, NTIA, USDA, and Treasury requires extensive interagency coordination with regard to mapping and funding commitments to identify proper locations for broadband funding and to avoid duplicative support. NTIA is required by the Infrastructure Act to rely on the maps created using FCC BDC data to determine unserved and underserved areas eligible for BEAD Program support. Infrastructure Act § 60102(c). Further, the Infrastructure Act also requires the Commission to establish and maintain the Broadband Funding Map to be an authoritative source of federal funding that supports broadband infrastructure. Id. § 60105(e). The Broadband Funding Map identifies locations served by federally funded infrastructure, as well as provides detailed data for each agency’s funding programs, including network details, company names, project timelines, and broadband speeds. Id. § 60105(d). The Broadband Funding Map is a valuable resource for federal agencies, as well as states, Tribal governments, and other stakeholders working to harmonize distinct broadband funding streams, and contains the Commission’s data and data received from USDA, NTIA, and Treasury. The Broadband Funding Map can be found at https://fundingmap.fcc.gov/home. The Commission and NTIA have also engaged with other federal agencies with broadband funding programs to ensure that the Broadband Funding Map captures all available deployment data across the federal government. 62. Connect2HealthFCC Task Force. The Connect2HealthFCC Task Force, Recognizing that technology innovations in clinical practice and care delivery are poised to fundamentally change the face of health care, in 2014 the Commission created the Connect2HealthFCC Task Force—a senior-level, multi-disciplinary internal team, housed in the Office of General Counsel—to help the agency drive progress on broadband and advanced health care technologies. See FCC, Connect2HealthFCC, https://www.fcc.gov/about-fcc/fcc-initiatives/connect2healthfcc (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). On behalf of the agency, the Task Force charts the broadband future of health and care through its various projects and initiatives and advises and provides recommendations to the Commission on matters concerning broadband and health. charged with exploring the intersection of and relationship between broadband, advanced technology, and health, has continued since the 2024 Report. Most significantly, in December 2024, the Commission launched significant updates and enhancements to its interactive data visualization platform, Mapping Broadband Health in America. Federal Communications Commission Expands Mapping Broadband Health in America Platform, GN Docket 23-309, Public Notice, 39 FCC Rcd 13415 (OGC 2024). Recognizing that broadband is a distinct social determinant of health and that advanced broadband-enabled technologies and solutions are an increasingly critical component of the health ecosystem in the United States, the 2024 version of the mapping platform significantly expanded the available broadband connectivity data to permit more robust visualizations; introduced new maternal health, opioids, chronic disease, and social determinants of health metrics which underlie many of the public health crises facing our nation; and reimagined the user interface and functionality. Id. at 13415. These enhancements ensure that the agency’s broadband health mapping platform remains a critical resource to help policymakers, Internet service providers, innovators, researchers, clinicians, community organizations, and other interested parties chart a concrete path to more improved health and health outcomes. Id. 63. Precision Agriculture Connectivity Task Force. The Task Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States (Precision Agriculture Connectivity Task Force) continued its work in 2024 in the months following the 2024 Report by providing advice and recommendations to the Commission and USDA on how to assess and advance deployment of broadband access service on unserved and underserved agricultural lands and to promote precision agriculture for both cropping and husbandry. See FCC Announces the Establishment of the Task Force for Reviewing Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States and Seeks Nominations for Membership, Public Notice, 34 FCC Rcd 5057 (WCB 2019) (announcing the 2019-2021 charter); FCC Announces the Membership and First Meeting of the Re-chartered Task Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States, GN Docket No. 19-329, Public Notice, 36 FCC Rcd 16828 (WCB 2021) (2022-2023 Precision Agriculture Connectivity Task Force Re-Charter Public Notice); FCC Announces the Membership and First Meeting of the Re-Chartered Task Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States, GN Docket No. 19-329, Public Notice, 39 FCC Rcd 282 (WCB 2024) (2024 Precision Agriculture Connectivity Task Force Re-Charter Public Notice); see also Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-334, § 12511(b)(2), (3), 132 Stat. 4490, 4993 (2018) (2018 Farm Bill) (establishing the Task Force and setting forth its duties and obligations). The Precision Agriculture Connectivity Task Force performed duties and submitted reports annually consistent with section 12511 of the 2018 Farm Bill and in consultation with USDA until the Task Force ended on Jan. 1, 2025. 2018 Farm Bill § 12511(b)(3), (5), (6). Following the 2024 Report, the Precision Agriculture Connectivity Task Force met four times in 2024 FCC Announces Next Meeting of the Task Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States on August 14, 2024, GN Docket No. 19-329, Public Notice, 39 FCC Rcd 8402 (WCB 2024); FCC Announces Next Meeting of the Task Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States on September 18, 2024, GN Docket No. 19-329, Public Notice, 39 FCC Rcd 8890 (WCB 2024); FCC Announces Next Meeting of the Task Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States on October 15, 2024, GN Docket No. 19-329, Public Notice, 39 FCC Rcd 10571 (WCB 2024); FCC Announces Next Meeting of the Task Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States on December 5, 2024, GN Docket No. 19-329, Public Notice, 39 FCC Rcd 11750 (WCB 2024). and adopted its final annual report at its December 5, 2024 meeting. FCC, Task Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States (Dec. 5, 2024), https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/PATF-report-final-122324.pdf. The report made various recommendations in the following four categories: (1) mapping and analyzing connectivity on agricultural lands; Id. at 3-5, 6-24. (2) examining current and future connectivity demand for precision agriculture; Id. at 3-5, 44-88. (3) accelerating broadband deployment on unserved agricultural lands; Id. at 3-5, 25-43. and (4) encouraging adoption and availability of high-quality jobs. Id. at 3-5, 89-121. The Precision Agriculture Connectivity Task Force’s third and final term ended on January 1, 2025, consistent with section 12511(b)(6) of the 2018 Farm Bill. 2018 Farm Bill § 12511(b)(6); FCC, Task Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States, Charter (Nov. 29, 2023), https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/precision-ag-task-force-charter-11292023.pdf. B. Removing Barriers to and Encouraging Broadband Investment 64. The Commission is focused on delivering core objectives to accelerate broadband deployment and ensure that the U.S. leads the world in next-generation networks and technologies, including unleashing high-speed infrastructure, restoring U.S. leadership in wireless, bolstering the U.S. space economy, and streamlining regulations. Guided by principles of innovation, deregulation, and competition, with an emphasis on forward-looking policies as well as simple and clear rules, the Commission has undertaken the following significant measures since the 2024 Report to remove barriers to broadband deployment and drive economic growth in the United States. FCC, Chairman Carr’s Build America Agenda, https://www.fcc.gov/build-america (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). 1. Unleashing High-Speed Infrastructure 65. Enabling high-speed infrastructure builds has been a core component of the Commission’s agenda as demonstrated through its actions since the 2024 Report. To that end, the Commission has worked to reduce regulatory barriers and costs that slow the transition from outdated legacy copper networks and services to IP-based infrastructure, accelerate wireline infrastructure buildout by examining whether state and local requirements prohibit the provision of telecommunications service, and speed the pole attachment process.  66. Accelerating the Transition to All IP Networks. The Commission has taken a multifaceted approach to accelerating the transition from legacy Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) based networks to all Internet Protocol (IP) based networks, a transition that will allow service providers to focus their investment on deploying networks fully capable of supporting the advanced telecommunications capability not only of today, but also tomorrow. Since the 2024 Report, and particularly over the last 15 months, the Commission has made great strides toward this goal. 67. Many of the Commission’s efforts have focused on eliminating regulatory barriers to transitioning to all IP networks. In March and May 2025, the Wireline Competition Bureau issued critical deregulatory orders relating to filings required of service providers seeking to discontinue TDM service or service over outdated and deteriorating copper facilities: (1) waiving for two years the filing requirements in the Commission’s network change disclosure rules and its process of issuing public notices for short-term network changes and copper retirements; Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, WC Docket No. 17-84, Order, 40 FCC Rcd 2026 (WCB 2025). (2) waiving for two years certain factual demonstrations required of service providers seeking to discontinue TDM service on a streamlined basis; Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, WC Docket No. 17-84, Order, 40 FCC Rcd 1999 (WCB 2025). and (3) waiving application filing requirements associated with grandfathering a legacy voice service, a data telecommunications service operating at speeds below 25/3 Mbps, or an interconnected VoIP service provisioned over copper. Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, WC Docket No. 17-84, Order, 40 FCC Rcd 2019 (WCB 2025); Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, WC Docket No. 17-84, Order, 40 FCC Rcd 3357 (WCB 2025). Following a July 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission adopted a Report and Order on March 26, 2026 expanding on these earlier efforts, and among other things, codified certain aspects of the relief granted in the March and May 2025 waivers. Reducing Barriers to Network Improvements and Service Changes; Accelerating Network Modernization, WC Docket Nos. 25-209, 25-208, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd 5329 (2025) (Network and Services Modernization Notice); Reducing Barriers to Network Improvements and Service Changes; Accelerating Network Modernization, WC Docket Nos. 25-209, 25-208, Report and Order, FCC 26-19 (Mar. 27, 2026) (Network and Services Modernization Order). In the March 2026 Report and Order, we completely eliminated the filing requirements associated with our network change disclosure rules while retaining or adopting safeguards to protect public safety and ensure 911 continuity. Network and Services Modernization Order at 3, para. 5. In addition, we significantly revised our section 214 service discontinuance rules while also maintaining essential continued support for 911 service. Id. at 3-4, paras. 6-7 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 214(a); 47 CFR § 63.60 et seq.). Earlier, in July 2024, the Commission adopted rules to facilitate the transition to next-generation 911, which will “provide new capabilities and improved interoperability and system resilience.” Facilitating Implementation of Next Generation 911 Services (NG911) et al., PS Docket Nos. 21-479 et al., Report and Order, 39 FCC Rcd 8137, 8138, para. 1 (2024). Also related to updating current services for IP networks, in November 2025, the Commission also addressed the need “to proactively adapt TRS obligations and programs, ensuring that all individuals with communication disabilities can continue to access functionally equivalent services in an increasingly IP-centric world.” Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities; Speech-to-Speech and Internet Protocol (IP) Speech-to-Speech Telecommunications Relay Services, CG Docket Nos. 03-123, 08-15, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd 9528, 9536, para. 18 (2025). Finally, we determined that, where the Commission has authorized discontinuance of interstate or jurisdictionally mixed legacy voice services, state requirements that make it impossible or impracticable for carriers to discontinue those services—and so in effect require carriers to continue providing interstate or jurisdictionally mixed telecommunications services—conflict with federal law and are subject to preemption. Network and Services Modernization Order at 56-61, paras. 106-15. 68. Since the 2024 Report, we have also issued notices of proposed rulemakings aimed at supporting IP interconnection. In an October 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, we proposed to forbear from certain statutory incumbent LEC interconnection obligations. Advancing IP Interconnection et al., WC Docket No. 25-304 et al., Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd 8566 (2025). The Commission also sought comment in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on whether the Commission should revisit any other provisions or rules that would be rendered redundant by eliminating such obligations and on what, if any, regulatory framework for IP interconnection should replace the interconnection framework from which we proposed to forbear. Id. at 8582-84, 8587-92, paras. 32-40, 52-64. In addition, we sought comment on ways the Commission could facilitate a successful transition to all-IP interconnection for voice services while retaining critical oversight in areas of public safety and consumer protection. Id. at 8584-85, paras. 41-42. On February 19, 2026, the Commission, building upon the Commission’s longstanding efforts, released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to reform the legacy intercarrier compensation so as to eliminate a significant monetary incentive that discourages current operators of TDM networks from transitioning to IP networks. Reforming Legacy Rules for an All-IP Future; Accelerating Network Modernization, WC Docket Nos. 25-311 & 25-208, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 26-11 (Feb. 19, 2026). If adopted, these proposals could accelerate the transition of the nation’s telecommunications networks to more efficient all-IP networks by, among other things, transitioning remaining access charges to bill-and-keep, detariffing those charges, and deregulating and detariffing end-user charges, while accounting for the Commission’s universal service responsibilities where needed. See id. 69. Section 253 Preemption. On June 26, 2026, we issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to advance the Commission’s Build America Agenda by proposing rules that would eliminate state and local requirements that constrain the deployment of modern high-speed wireline infrastructure by burying providers in red tape and excessive fees in violation of section 253 of the Act. In the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission proposed and sought comment on: (1) establishing a rebuttable presumption that state and local governments have effectively prohibited the provision of wireline telecommunications services if they fail to process applications for access and use of public rights-of-way within 120 days; (2) limiting the fees that state and local governments may charge for a wireline telecommunications authorization to a reasonable approximation of the government’s actual, direct costs of managing the rights-of-way with respect to that authorization; (3) requiring that the value of in-kind compensation demanded by state and local governments count toward any safe harbor fee levels adopted by the Commission; and (4) prohibiting state and local governments from imposing additional requirements on wireline telecommunications infrastructure deployments on the grounds that the infrastructure may be used to provide other services. Build America: Eliminating Barriers to Wireline Deployments, WC Docket No. 25-253, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 26-40, at 7-10, paras. 12-72 (June 26, 2026). 70. Pole Attachments. On July 24, 2025, the Commission released a Fifth Report and Order, Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and Orders on Reconsideration that advances the Commission’s efforts to reform its pole attachment rules to remove barriers to broadband deployment and investment. Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, WC Docket No. 17-84, Fifth Report and Order, Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and Orders on Reconsideration, 40 FCC Rcd 5395, 5402, paras. 12-13 (2025) (Fifth Wireline Infrastructure Order, Fourth Further Notice, and Orders on Reconsideration). In the Fifth Report and Order, the Commission: (1) required attachers to provide advance written notice to utilities of forthcoming larger pole attachment orders and imposed a meet-and-confer requirement following the notice; (2) established a timeline for large pole attachment requests, but provided that an attacher that fails to provide the requisite advance written notice of such orders waives the applicable timelines; (3) improved timelines by requiring prompt 15-day notification from utilities if they cannot meet survey and make-ready deadlines, allowing self-help for estimates, and prohibiting utility imposed limits on application size and frequency that have the effect of restricting the number of pole attachments that attachers may seek in a given timeframe; and (4) expedited the contractor approval process by requiring utilities to respond to a request to add contractors to a utility-approved list within 30 days of receiving the request. Fifth Wireline Infrastructure Order, Fourth Further Notice, and Orders on Reconsideration, 40 FCC Rcd at 5402-28, paras. 14-50. In the Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking the Commission sought comment on ways to further facilitate the processing of pole attachment applications and make-ready and on whether light poles fall within the purview of section 224 of the Act. Id. at 5428-61, paras. 51-103. Finally, in the Orders on Reconsideration, the Commission denied in part and granted in part the Petition for Clarification and/or Reconsideration of a prior declaratory ruling, and denied a Petition for Reconsideration of a previous report and order to reduce any uncertainty about existing pole attachment requirements. Id. at 5461-73, paras. 104-26, 5473-80, paras. 127-42. 2. Ensuring U.S. Wireless Leadership 71. Wireless Infrastructure. The Commission has undertaken multiple efforts aimed at freeing up airwaves and restoring the country’s leadership in wireless by facilitating more network building and innovation. 72. In March of 2025, CTIA filed a Petition for Rulemaking requesting that the Commission update and streamline its NEPA rules to facilitate wireless broadband deployment across the country. CTIA – The Wireless Association’s Petition for Rulemaking, RM-12003 (filed Mar. 27, 2025). The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau issued a Public Notice in March 2025 seeking comment on CTIA’s Petition. Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on CTIA Petition for Rulemaking, RM-12003, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 2239 (2025). In August 2025, the Commission adopted the NEPA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to take a fresh look at its environmental rules in light of changes to the legal landscape, including amendments to NEPA made under the 2023 Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA), and consistent with the objectives of Executive Order (E.O.) 14154, “Unleashing American Energy.” Modernizing the Commission’s National Environmental Policy Act Rules, WT Docket No. 25-217, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd 6377, 6378, para. 1 (2025) (NEPA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking). The Commission incorporated the record for the CTIA Petition (rulemaking proceeding RM-12003) into the NEPA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and terminated RM-12003. NEPA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd at 6419, para. 116; see also Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, Pub. L. No. 118-5, 137 Stat. 10 (2023); Unleashing American Energy, Exec. Order No. 14154, 90 Fed. Reg. 8353, 8355 (Jan. 29, 2025) (E.O. 14154). In the NEPA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission sought comment on how it should revise its rules to streamline the environmental review process, promote efficiency, and encourage deployment of infrastructure that results in more competition and technological innovation. NEPA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd at 6378, para. 1; see also Press Release, FCC, FCC Aims to Overhaul NEPA Process to Accelerate Permitting and High-Speed Infrastructure Builds (Aug. 7, 2025), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-413547A1.pdf. 73. In September 2025, the Commission adopted the Build America Wireless Deployment Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which proposed changes to the Commission’s rules to further streamline the wireless permitting process and facilitate the rapid buildout of wireless infrastructure. Build America: Eliminating Barriers to Wireless Deployments, WT Docket No. 25-276, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd 8115 (2025) (Build America Wireless Deployment Notice of Proposed Rulemaking). In the Build America Wireless Deployment Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission sought to clarify and potentially expand upon the Commission’s rulings under certain permitting provisions of section 6409(a) of the Spectrum Act of 2012 (Spectrum Act) that expedite state or local approval of certain modifications of existing tower and wireless base stations, Id. at 8117, para. 4; see also Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-96, title VI (Spectrum Act), § 6409(a), 126 Stat. 156 (Feb. 22, 2012) (codified as 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a)). and it also sought comment on whether the Commission should take further steps to ensure that state and local permitting regulations do not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the deployment of wireless infrastructure facilities pursuant to sections 253 and 332(c)(7) of the Communications Act. Build America Wireless Deployment Notice of Proposed Rulemaking at 3-4, para. 5; see also 47 U.S.C. §§ 253(a), 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II). Sections 253 and 332(c)(7) of the Communications Act expressly preempt state or local requirements that prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of telecommunications service and personal wireless service, respectively. 3. Bolstering the U.S. Space Economy 74. Satellite Infrastructure. With respect to the space economy, the Commission has taken great efforts to provide the private sector with a predictable and simple regulatory framework based on speed, security, and satellite spectrum abundance. Notably, the Commission has cleared out satellite infrastructure backlogs and reduced applications processing times at a record pace. For example, during calendar 2025, the backlog of pending applications was cut by half, and the Space Bureau processed 3,418 applications, a 21% increase compared with 2024. 75. On March 10, 2025, the Space Bureau implemented new, temporary procedures to expedite the processing of certain types of earth station applications for special temporary authority (STA). Space Bureau Announces Temporary Expedited Processing Procedures for Earth Station Applications Seeking Special Temporary Authority, SB Docket No. 25-207, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 1558 (SB 2025); see also 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A) (exempting from APA rulemaking requirements rules of agency procedure); In the Matter of Expediting Initial Processing of Satellite and Earth Station Applications, IB Docket Nos. 22-411 and 22-271, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 38 FCC Rcd 8838 (2023). These temporary procedures were recently renewed until March 10, 2027, while the Commission considers more comprehensive streamlining measures. Space Bureau Announces One Year Extension of Temporary Expedited Processing Procedures for Earth Station Applications Seeking Special Temporary Authority, Public Notice, DA 26-192 (SB Feb. 26, 2026). On April 30, 2026, the Commission voted to modernize its satellite spectrum-sharing rules, which is a major step toward enhancing the satellite broadband experience for millions of Americans by enabling faster speeds, lower costs, and greater reliability. Modernizing Spectrum Sharing for Satellite Broadband, SB Docket No. 25-157, Report and Order, FCC 26-26 (Apr. 30, 2026) (adopting rules to revise sharing regime between geostationary (GSO) and non-geostationary (NGSO) satellite systems in the 10.7-12.7, 17.3-19.6, and 10.7-20.2 GHz bands). The Report and Order replaces the Equivalent Power Flux Density (EPFD) framework with modern, performance-based GSO protection criteria that take account of the improved spectrum sharing possibilities that modern satellite technology has brought, including through use of adaptive coding and modulation (ACM). Id. at 21-26, paras. 43-49. The new sharing regime builds on the Commission’s time-tested framework for good-faith coordination to allow NGSO and GSO operators to bargain for appropriate interference protections through voluntary, private agreements. Id. at 17-19, paras. 35-37. Today’s satellite systems offer high-speed, low-latency broadband connectivity across the country to U.S. consumers and businesses and enable lifesaving communications in rural areas and during emergencies. Id. at 2, para. 1. Latency refers to the time it takes for a data packet to travel from one endpoint of the network to another. The Commission considers low-latency broadband connectivity in this context to be less than or equal to 100 ms. Even so, regulatory barriers have held satellite systems back from delivering even better coverage, capacity, and signal quality. See id. at 2, para. 1 (stating that power levels for NGSO satellite systems have been restricted based on “ late 1990s era” limits designed to protect GSO satellite systems). This change could also unlock more than $2 billion in economic benefits for the American people and up to seven-fold more capacity for space-based broadband services. See id. at 2, para. 2. On August 8, 2025, the Commission eliminated unnecessary barriers to satellite infrastructure builds, including broadband operations by revising and updating space and earth license application policies and procedures. Expediting Initial Processing of Satellite and Earth Station Applications et al., IB Docket Nos. 22-411 and 22-271, Second Report and Order, 40 FCC Rcd 6443 (2025). These actions included clarifying the limited scope of current restrictions, deleting those antiquated and burdensome restrictions altogether, and adopting reforms to pave the way for neutral-host ground stations. Id. at 6444-45, para. 3. 76. On January 9, 2026, the Commission granted Space Exploration Holdings, LLC (SpaceX) a major authorization to advance its second-generation Starlink satellite system, marking a significant milestone in global satellite broadband connectivity. Space Exploration Holdings, LLC, Application for Authority for Modification of the SpaceX NGSO Satellite System, Authorization and Order, DA 26-36 (SB Jan. 9, 2026) (SpaceX Gen2 Upgrade Authorization). Under this grant, SpaceX is authorized to construct, deploy, and operate an additional 7,500 Gen2 Starlink satellites, bringing the total to 15,000 satellites worldwide. Id. at para. 2. This expansion will enable SpaceX to deliver high-speed, low-latency broadband service globally, including enhanced mobile and supplemental coverage from space. The SB decision allows SpaceX to: (1) upgrade the Gen2 Starlink satellites with advanced form factors and cutting-edge technology; (2) operate across Ku-, Ka-, V-, E-, and W-band frequencies, supporting both Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) and Mobile Satellite Service (MSS); (3) waive obsolete requirements that prevented overlapping beam coverage and enhanced capacity; (4) add new orbital shells at altitudes ranging from 340 km to 485 km, optimizing coverage and performance; and (5) Provide direct-to-cell connectivity outside the United States and supplemental coverage within the United States, paving the way for next-generation mobile services. SpaceX Gen2 Upgrade Authorization at 5-8. 77. On February 10, 2026, the Commission approved the application of Amazon’s Kuiper System to deploy 4,500 additional Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites. This expansion brings the total authorized constellation to approximately 7,700 satellites. Kuiper System, LLC, ICFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-20211104-00145 and SAT-AMD-20250311-00068 (SB Feb. 7, 2026). This amended authorization, which increases the total number of authorized satellites and frequency bands, among other measures, will facilitate the expeditious deployment high-throughput broadband connectivity services to enterprise and consumer end users, as well as for aircraft, maritime vessels, and land vehicles. Amendment Application of Kuiper System, LLC, ICFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-20211104-00145 and SAT-AMD-20250311-00068, Legal Narrative at 3, 13-14 (filed Mar. 11, 2025). 78. Recognizing that unnecessary and outdated regulations can curtail innovation in the space economy, on July 22, 2026, the Commission adopted rules to modernize space licensing, including licensing that support satellite broadband networks and competition. Space Modernization for the 21st Century, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, SB Docket No. 25-306, FCC 26-47 (rel. July 23, 2026). The plan will modernize the Commission’s licensing processes to match the scale and dynamism of today’s space economy. It will do so by doing away with bespoke licensing processes in favor of a “licensing assembly line.” Id. at 12-76, paras. 34-195. This will include expediting licensing requests presumed to be in the public interest, as well as simplifying applications, establishing clear timelines, and increasing flexibility for licensed operations. Id. 4. Streamlining Regulations 79. Deleting Outdated Rules and Reducing Unnecessary Regulatory Burdens. Outdated and unnecessary regulations derail efforts to close the digital divide. To this end, the Commission has undertaken the largest effort in its history to eliminate such rules through its Delete, Delete, Delete proceeding. The Commission opened a proceeding on March 12, 2025 to implement a series of executive orders to unleash prosperity through deregulation and ensure that the agency is efficiently delivering great results for the American people. Delete, Delete, Delete, GN Docket No. 25-133, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 1601 (2025) (Delete, Delete, Delete Public Notice). This initiative benefits all entities subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction by allowing them to focus their efforts on providing high-quality service of all types to the maximum number of Americans rather than on compliance with outdated and inefficient regulations. Since the Commission opened the proceeding, the FCC has deleted roughly 1,274 rule provisions, 149,566 words, and more than 338 pages of obsolete regulations. Delete, Delete, Delete, GN Docket No. 25-133, Direct Final Rule, FCC 26-15, at 45 (Statement of Chairman Brendan Carr) (Mar. 27, 2026). 5. Other Initiatives to Encourage Broadband Investment 80. Internet Transparency. On July 11, 2025, the Wireline Competition Bureau adopted an Order Delete, Delete, Delete et al., GN Docket No. 25-133 et al., Order, 40 FCC Rcd 4914 (WCB 2025) (CFR Clean-Up Order) (also conforming Part 51 of the Commission’s rules in response to a court decision nullifying certain provisions in Part 51). that in part conformed the Commission’s rules to the Sixth Circuit’s decision in In re MCP No. 185 (Ohio Telecom), In re MCP No. 185, 124 F.4th 993 (6th Cir. 2025) (Ohio Telecom), pet. for rehearing denied. which set aside the Second Title II Order Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet, WC Docket 23-320, Declaratory Ruling, Order, Report and Order, and Order on Reconsideration, 39 FCC Rcd 4975 (2024) (Second Title II Order), pets. for review granted and order set aside, Ohio Telecom, 124 F.4th 993. and thereby restored the light-touch regulatory approach that has spurred investment in and deployment of broadband networks. The Second Title II Order, adopted on April 25, 2024, sought to reclassify broadband Internet access service (BIAS) as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Act and instituted conduct rules on BIAS providers. On January 2, 2025, the Sixth Circuit, setting aside the Second Title II Order in its Ohio Telecom decision, held that broadband providers offer only an information service under the Act and that the Commission is not permitted to classify mobile broadband as a commercial mobile service. See Ohio Telecom, 124 F.4th at 998. The Sixth Circuit issued its mandate on Mar. 20, 2025, after denying a petition for rehearing en banc by the Intervenors. See Ohio Telecom, slip op. (Mar. 11, 2025). As the rules adopted in the Second Title II Order never went into effect, and in furtherance of the Commission’s goal to “review its rules to identify and eliminate those that are unnecessary in light of current circumstances,” Delete, Delete, Delete Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd at 1601. the Wireline Competition Bureau issued its July 11, 2025, Order to restore the Commission’s rules to reflect how they would read absent the changes adopted in the Second Title II Order, accounting for later amendments to those rules adopted in other Commission actions. See CFR Clean-Up Order, 40 FCC Rcd 4914-15, para. 2. The restored rules require BIAS providers to disclose their network management practices, performance characteristics, and commercial terms of their broadband Internet access services. 47 CFR § 8.1(a). These rules ensure providers can continue to invest in the deployment and advancement of broadband networks without having to divert resources to compliance with heavy-handed Title II requirements. 81. Mobile Phone Unlocking. Until January 2026, Verizon was the only major provider required under the Commission’s rules to unlock its handsets 60 days after activation, a circumstance that had incentivized bad actors to target those handsets to carry out fraud and other illegal acts. Press Release, FCC, FCC Acts to Bring More Uniform Approach to Handset Unlocking Rules; FCC Waives 2007 Rule that Incentivized Handset Theft and Fraud (Jan. 12, 2026), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-417932A1.pdf. (Handset Unlocking Press Release) (Statement of Chairman Brendan Carr: “Sophisticated criminal networks have exploited the FCC’s handset unlocking policies to carry out criminal acts—including transnational handset trafficking schemes and facilitating broader criminal enterprises like drug running and human smuggling. By waiving a regulation that incentivized bad actors to target one particular carrier’s handsets for theft, we now have a uniform industry standard that can help stem the flow of handsets into the black market.”). The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau addressed this disparity in January 2026 by granting Verizon’s request for waiver of the section 26.16(e) handset unlocking rule, including the unlocking commitment that Verizon agreed to as part of its acquisition of TracFone. Service Rules for the 698-746, 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands, Promoting Consumer Choice and Wireless competition Through Handset Unlocking Requirements and Policies, Application of Verizon Communications Inc. and America Movil, S.A.B. de C.V. for Consent to Transfer Control of International Section 214 Authorization, WT Docket Nos. 06-150 and 24-186 and GN Docket No. 21-112, Order, DA 26-43 at 1-2, para. 4 (Jan. 12, 2026) (Verizon Handset Unlocking Waiver Order); see also 47 CFR § 27.16(e); Verizon Request for Waiver, Regarding the Commission’s Ban on Locking Handsets for C-Block Licensees, WT Docket Nos. 24-186 and 06-150; GN Docket No. 21-112 (filed May 19, 2025), https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/106062281927545/1. Like its competitors, Verizon will now provide unlocking services in alignment with the CTIA Consumer Code for Wireless Service, established in 2013. Verizon Unlocking Waiver Order at 2, para. 4; Handset Unlocking Press Release; see also CTIA, Consumer Code for Wireless Service, https://www.ctia.org/the-wireless-industry/industry-commitments/consumer-code-for-wireless-service (last visited Aug. 11, 2026) (CTIA Consumer Code for Wireless Service). These voluntary unlocking standards cover disclosure, postpaid and prepaid unlocking policies, notice, response time, and unlocking policy for deployed military personnel. Verizon Unlocking Waiver Order at 3, para. 6. 82. Transactions. The Commission continues to review and approve transactions that will deliver more investment and network capacity. The Commission has approved two significant transactions involving fixed broadband service providers since the 2024 Report, each expected to aid broadband deployment. On May 16, 2025, the Wireline Competition Bureau, Office of International Affairs, and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau approved the sale of Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (Frontier) to Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon). Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc. Application for Consent to Transfer Control, WC Docket No. 24-445, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 40 FCC Rcd 3156 (WCB/OIA/WTB 2025) (Frontier-Verizon Order). This transaction closed on January 20, 2026. Dan Schulman, Introducing Frontier, a Verizon Company, (Jan. 20, 2026), https://www.verizon.com/about/news/introducing-frontier-verizon-company. Approving the transaction will allow Verizon to upgrade and expand Frontier’s existing network in 25 states, bringing more fiber to more communities. See id. at 3169-70, paras. 29-34. Verizon’s new fiber deployments will enable the retirement of old copper networks, ensuring that more communities benefit from advanced technologies. See id. On February 27, 2026, the Wireline Competition Bureau, Office of International Affairs, and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau approved the acquisition of Cox Enterprises, Inc. (Cox) by Charter Communications, Inc. (Charter). Cox Enterprises, Inc. and Charter Communications, Inc., Applications for Consent to Transfer Control, WC Docket No. 25-233, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 26-211 (WCB/OIA/WTB Feb. 27, 2026). After consummation of this transaction, Charter committed that it will invest billions of dollars to upgrade its network and Cox’s network to deliver high-speed broadband service to homes and businesses across its 41 state service area, particularly through Charter’s Rural Construction Initiative, which can bring better service and job opportunities to rural America. See id. at 12-16, paras. 26-32. 83. In addition, we have taken action on several significant mobile wireless transactions which will help restore America’s leadership in wireless through extending high-speed wireless services to even more Americans. In July 2025, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and the Office of International Affairs approved the applications of T-Mobile US, Inc. (T-Mobile) and United States Cellular Corporation (UScellular) to transfer control and assign to T-Mobile certain spectrum licenses, an international section 214 authorization, all customers, and spectrum leases held by UScellular and its subsidiaries. Applications of T-Mobile US. Inc. and United States Cellular Corporation For Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses, Authorizations, and Leases, GN Docket No. 24-286, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 40 FC Rcd 4776 (2025) (T-Mobile-UScellular Order); see also Applications of T-Mobile US, Inc. and United States Cellular Corporation for Transfer of Control and Assignment of Certain Licenses, Authorizations, and Leases, GN Docket No. 24-286, ULS File No. 0011180491 (Lead Section 310(d) Application) (filed Sept. 13, 2024); Application of T-Mobile US, Inc. and United States Cellular Corporation for Assignment of International Section 214 Authorization, ICFS File No. ITC-ASG-20240913-00139 (filed Sept. 13, 2024). This transaction is expected to result in substantial public interest benefits for customers of both T-Mobile and UScellular due in large part to increased network efficiencies and spectrum utilization, which will result in additional capacity and coverage benefits, including in rural areas. T-Mobile-UScellular Order, 40 FCC Rcd at 4778, para. 3; see also Press Release, FCC, FCC Completes Review of Wireless, Satellite, and Fiber Transactions, The Three Combinations Approved This Week Will Strengthen Investment, Lower Costs, and Improve Service Quality (July 11, 2025) (Transactions Press Release), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-412914A1.pdf. T-Mobile will have the ability to offer improved fixed wireless access service to both current and new users with higher speeds and capacity than was possible for either of the standalone companies. T-Mobile-UScellular Order, 40 FCC Rcd at 4778, para. 3; see also Transactions Press Release. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau approved a transaction in December 2025 for AT&T Inc. to acquire Array Digital Infrastructure Inc. (Array) (formerly known as UScellular) spectrum that covers hundreds of rural markets and a large percentage of the U.S. population. Applications of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and United States Cellular Corporation for Consent to Assign Licenses, WT Docket No. 25-150, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 40 FCC Rcd 9290 (WTB 2025); see also Press Release, FCC, Chairman Carr Highlights Wins Delivered in 2025 (Dec. 23, 2025), https://www.fcc.gov/document/chairman-carr-highlights-wins-delivered-2025. In May 2026, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau also approved a transaction for Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless, to acquire Array spectrum, which continued the Commission’s efforts to make additional spectrum available to facilities-based providers with the incentive and ability to build networks that benefit American consumers. Applications of Cellco Partnership and United States Cellular Corporation For Consent to Assign Licenses, WT Docket No. 25-192, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 26-486 (WTB 2026). 84. On May 12, 2026, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau approved the applications of AT&T Mobility II LLC (AT&T) and EchoStar Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries (EchoStar) to assign to AT&T certain spectrum licenses held by EchoStar. See generally Applications of AT&T Mobility II LLC and Echostar Corporation for Consent to Assign Licenses, WT Docket No. 25-303, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 26-470 (WTB 2026) (AT&T-Echostar Order); see also Press Release, FCC, FCC Secures Win for America’s Leadership in Next-Gen Connectivity (May 12, 2026). This transaction is expected to result in significant public interest benefits including deploying valuable spectrum, that could otherwise be left unused or underutilized, covering approximately 99% of the United States population. AT&T-Echostar Order at 2, para. 2. AT&T will be able to improve its 5G and fixed wireless network coverage, capacity and performance throughout the country, which will benefit AT&T’s customers and customers of other service providers who rely on AT&T’s network to provide wireless service. Id. at 2, 20-22, paras. 2, 48-50. 85. On May 12, 2026, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and the Space Bureau consented to the applications of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) and EchoStar to assign underutilized spectrum from EchoStar to SpaceX for use in its next generation direct-to-device network (D2D). See generally Applications of Spectrum Business Trust 2025-1, Space Exploration Technologies Corp., and EchoStar Corporation for Consent to Assign Spectrum and Earth Station Licenses, GN Docket No. 25-302, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 26-471, (WTB/SB May 12, 2026) (SpaceX-EchoStar Order); see also Press Release, FCC, FCC Secures Win for America’s Leadership in Next-Gen Connectivity (May 12, 2026). The spectrum assignment will occur in two steps: first the spectrum will be assigned from EchoStar to Spectrum Business Trust 2025-1 for the benefit of SpaceX, and second the spectrum will be assigned from Spectrum Business Trust 2025-1 to SpaceX. Id. at 5-6, para. 12. This transaction has the potential to unlock transformational, ubiquitous connectivity to mobile users, particularly in hard-to-reach areas of the United States. Id. at 17, para. 38. In the near term, consumers nationwide will benefit from a tremendous increase in the capacity of SpaceX’s innovative D2D service, which will help close coverage gaps and provide increased capacity, reduced latency, and broader service coverage. Id. at 2, 17-18, paras. 2, 40; see supra section V.C.2. In the longer term, SpaceX’s planned deployment of this spectrum has the potential to increase competition in the mobile wireless marketplace—D2D service will supplement current mobile networks and potentially lead to more wireless service options, particularly for consumers who live or work in geographically hard-to-reach areas of the country. SpaceX-EchoStar Order at 2, 20, paras. 3, 43. And as technology advances, SpaceX’s service offerings may lead to increased competition in the provision of retail wireless services to the benefit of all consumers in the United States. Id. at 20, para. 43. 86. On July 1, 2026, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau took another step to facilitate robust use of spectrum for the American people by approving a spectrum assignment exchange between T-Mobile and Grain Management, LLC (Grain) and its licensee subsidiaries to support a range of terrestrial services and D2D operations. See generally Applications of T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Grain Management, LLC For Consent to Assign Licenses, WT Docket No. 25-178, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 26-653 (WTB July 1, 2026). Specifically, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau granted the applications for T-Mobile to assign certain 800 MHz licenses to Grain and for Grain to assign certain 600 MHz licenses to T-Mobile. Id. Recognizing the growing convergence of wireless and satellite broadband—and to foster intensive use of the 800 MHz licenses—the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau adopted strict terrestrial buildout conditions as well as incentives for Grain to partner with D2D operators, tied to clearly defined, achievable D2D performance requirements for the 800 MHz spectrum. Id. at 19-22, para. 48. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau’s approval of this spectrum exchange between T-Mobile and Grain continues the agency’s effort to ensure that the national resource of spectrum delivers powerful benefits to the American people. 87. The Commission also approved a significant merger of satellite providers. On July 11, 2025, the Chiefs of the Space Bureau, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, and the Office of Engineering and Technology approved the merger of SES and Intelsat, which promises to boost competition, reduce costs, improve service quality, and bolster investment. Applications for Transfer of Control of Licenses from Intelsat Holdings, S.a.r.l. to SES S.A., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 40 FCC Rcd 4191 (OET/SB/WTB 2025). C. Access to Spectrum 1. Access to Terrestrial Wireless Spectrum 88. Spectrum is a critical component of 5G, as well as other advanced wireless services. By making spectrum available, the Commission ensures that wireless providers are able to deploy 5G networks and other advanced wireless services expeditiously. The Commission has pursued a comprehensive strategy to make additional mid-band, high-band, and low-band spectrum available through initial licensing and also through other innovative means, including secondary market transactions. Importantly, Congress restored the Commission’s general spectrum auction authority, which had expired in March 2023, in the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBBA Act). See Press Release, FCC, Carr Congratulates President Trump and Congressional Republicans on Win; Spectrum Portions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Advance America’s Leadership (July 3, 2025), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-412702A1.pdf. Section 40002 of the Working Families Tax Cut Act reinstated the FCC’s general auction authority through September 30, 2034, for frequencies other than those from 3.1 to 3.45 GHz and from 7.4 to 8.4 GHz. Pub. L. No. 119-21, § 40002, 139 Stat. 72 (2025) (One Big Beautiful Bill or OBBB Act). The new law requires the Commission to auction at least 800 megahertz of spectrum, subject to specified timelines and milestones, that must include 500 megahertz from specified frequencies that are identified by NTIA, in consultation with the Commission, for reallocation to non-Federal use, shared Federal and non-Federal use, or a combination thereof, for full power commercial licensed use cases. See generally OBBB Act. The Commission will continue to advance the nation’s 5G and 6G leadership by executing on this massive spectrum pipeline. Press Release, FCC, Chairman Carr Highlights Wins Delivered in 2025 (Dec. 23, 2025), https://www.fcc.gov/document/chairman-carr-highlights-wins-delivered-2025. The Commission will necessarily review its auction priorities in response to this Congressional mandate. 89. On July 22, 2026, the Commission adopted a Report and Order, Order of Proposed Modification, and Order on Reconsideration (C-Band Order) to expand the ecosystem for next-generation wireless services in the 3.7-4.2 GHz band (C-Band) by making 160 megahertz of the 3.98-4.2 GHz band (Upper C-Band) available for terrestrial wireless flexible use in the contiguous United Sates via a system of competitive bidding. Space Modernization for the 21st Century, SB Docket No. 25-306, Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 26-47 (July 23, 2026). This action is in furtherance of Congress’ direction in the OBBB Act to “complet[e] a system of competitive bidding . . . for not less than 100 megahertz in the band between 3.98 gigahertz and 4.2 gigahertz” by July 4, 2027. Pub. L. No. 119-21, § 40002(b)(2), 139 Stat. 72 (2025) (OBBB Act). It sets the course for the Commission to meet and significantly exceed the statutory floor set by Congress by making 160 megahertz available on a transition schedule that will permit wireless deployments in the band faster than stakeholders anticipated. In releasing more mid-band spectrum, the Commission has taken a major step towards securing American’s wireless future and the robust economic benefits that it brings. 90. In August 2024, the Commission adopted the UAS Report and Order, which enables initial unmanned aircraft system (UAS) operations in the 5030-5091 MHz band. Spectrum Rules and Policies for the Operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems, WT Docket No. 22-323, Report and Order, 39 FCC Rcd 10005 (2024) (UAS Report and Order). In the UAS Report and Order, the Commission adopted service rules that will provide operators the ability to obtain direct frequency assignments in a portion of the 5030-5091 MHz band. Under the rules, one or more dynamic frequency management systems will manage and coordinate access to the spectrum and enable its safe and efficient use, by providing requesting operators with temporary frequency assignments to support UAS control link communications with a level of reliability suitable for operations in controlled airspace and other safety-critical circumstances. UAS Report and Order, 39 FCC Rcd at 10006, para. 3. The Commission expects that enabling early, direct access to a portion of the band will facilitate safe integration of UAS into the National Airspace System and help the United States realize enormous potential benefits from UAS technology, including aiding in search and rescue missions, supporting agriculture, and inspecting infrastructure, among other important uses. Id. at 10006, paras. 1-3. 91. In October 2024, the Commission adopted new rules to bolster its coordinated nationwide approach to the 4.9 GHz spectrum band through a nationwide band manager framework.Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission’s Rules, WP Docket No. 07-100, Eighth Report and Order, 39 FCC Rcd 12032 (2024) (Part 90 Eighth Report and Order). To further the goals of coordinating operations in the band, optimizing public safety use, and facilitating the integration of the latest commercially available technologies, including 5G, for the benefit of public safety users, but also to ensure that the 4.9 GHz band is put to more robust use nationwide in the near term, the 4.9 GHz Band Manager, once selected, will be eligible to apply for a nationwide overlay license and authorized to enter into a sharing agreement with the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet). Part 90 Eighth Report and Order, 39 FCC Rcd at 12032-33, para. 1. 92. In January 2025, the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to facilitate opportunities for Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and UAS. Facilitating Opportunities for Advanced Air Mobility, WT Docket No. 24-629, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd 745 (2025) (Advanced Air Mobility Notice of Proposed Rulemaking). AAM is a rapidly evolving new sector of the aviation industry that typically uses electric or hybrid-electric propulsion with vertical or short takeoff and landing capability, and it is intended to provide new levels of accessibility, convenience, and connectivity for people and cargo. AAM systems may be either crewed or uncrewed, with personnel either piloting the aircraft on board or through remotely piloted or automated techniques. Id. at 746, para. 1 & n.1; see also, Press Release, FCC, FCC Proposes Spectrum Rules to Support Advanced Flight Technologies, (Jan. 17, 2025), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-408982A1.pdf. The Notice proposed and sought comment on changes to the rules, including aspects of the Commission’s part 1, 2, 22, and 90 rules, that govern the operations of three distinct bands of spectrum: the 450 MHz Band, the 24.45-24.65 GHz Band, and the Commercial Aviation Air Ground Systems Band (849-851 and 894-896 MHz band). Advanced Air Mobility Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd at 747-48, paras. 3-5. 93. In January 2025, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau released a Public Notice seeking to supplement the record on the Commission’s proposal to re-allocate the 1675-1680 MHz band for shared use between incumbent federal operations and non-federal fixed or mobile operations on a co-primary basis. Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks to Supplement the Record on Proposed Rules to Re-Allocate 1675-1680 MHz Band, WT Docket No. 19-116, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 119 (2025) (1675 Refresh Public Notice); see also Allocation and Service Rules for the 1675-1680 MHz Band, WT Docket No. 19-116, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 34 FCC Rcd 3552, 3553, para. 2 (2019) (“In this proceeding, we are pursuing the joint goals of making spectrum available for new, non-federal flexible wireless use while protecting incumbent federal operations . . . The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) currently uses multiple frequencies in the band for its weather tracking and monitoring capabilities.”). A month earlier, NTIA released a report concluding that it is technically feasible to share the band, currently used by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for transmission of time-sensitive data, with commercial wireless services, subject to certain conditions. See NTIA, Office of Spectrum Management, Spectrum Pipeline Reallocation Engineering Study Follow On: Task 3 – Identifying Regulatory Constraints (Dec. 10, 2024), https://www.ntia.gov/report/2024/spectrum-pipeline-reallocation-engineering-study-follow-task-3-identifying-regulatory-constraints; see also 1675 MHz Refresh Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd at 119-20. 94. In November 2024, the Commission adopted a Report and Order finalizing the transition timeline for sunsetting the use of dedicated short-range communications (DSRC)-based technology in the 5.9 GHz band and adopting technical rules for the operation of C-V2X-based technology in the upper 30-megahertz (5.895–5.925 GHz) portion of the band. Use of the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band, ET Docket No. 19-138, Second Report and Order, 39 FCC Rcd 13019 (2024). C-V2X technology provides direct communications between vehicles, roadside infrastructure, and other road users such as cyclists, pedestrians, and road workers to facilitate, among other things, non-line-of-sight awareness, notice of changing driving conditions, and automated driving. See Press Release, FCC, FCC to Vote on Auto Safety Spectrum Rules (July 17, 2024), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-404027A1.pdf. In February 2025, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau released a public notice to provide guidance to Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) licensees seeking to transition from DSRC-based operations to C-V2X in the upper 30-megahertz portion of the 5.9 GHz band, as well as guidance to entities seeking to apply for C-V2X-based ITS licenses for the first time. Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Provide Guidance for Intelligent Transportation System Licensees to Transition from DSRC to C-V2X Operations in the 5.895-5.925 GHz Band and Grant a Limited Waiver of the 47 CFR § 90.372 Deadline to Confirm Transition Out of the 5.850-5.895 GHz Portion of the 5.9 GHz Band, ET Docket No. 19-138, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 1202 (2025). 95. In March 2025, the Commission released a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) to build a record on specific actions it could take to incentivize and support industry efforts to develop Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) technologies and solutions for civil use that may be used in conjunction with the U.S. Global Positioning System (GPS) to form a resilient and secure PNT system of systems. See Promoting the Development of Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Technologies and Solutions, WT Docket No. 25-110, Notice of Inquiry, 40 FCC Rcd 2641 (2025). The inquiry focused on complementary PNT given the predominant use of GPS in the United States, but also sought information regarding alternative PNT technologies that may better achieve PNT resilience nationwide. The NOI also noted the Commission’s interest in exploring options that rely on, or incorporate, solutions provided by NextNav, which offers a terrestrial solution that operates in the 902-928 MHz band (Lower 900 MHz Band) that provides horizontal positioning and timing. Id., 40 FCC Rcd at 2654 para. 29. In April 2024, NextNav filed a Petition for Rulemaking requesting that the Commission initiate a proceeding to reconfigure the Lower 900 MHz Band and adopt new rules to enable the deployment of its 5G Terrestrial PNT network to complement GPS; NextNav Petition for Rulemaking, Enabling Next-Generation Terrestrial Positioning, Navigation, and Timing and 5G: A Plan for the Lower 900 MHz Band (902-928 MHz) at i (filed Apr. 16, 2024). NextNav also filed a supplement proposing specific part 90 rule revisions. Letter from Robert Lantz, General Counsel, NextNav Inc., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (filed June 7, 2024) (jointly referred to as “Petition”). the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and the Office of Engineering and Technology sought comment on the Petition in August 2024. Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and Office of Engineering and Technology Seek Comment on NextNav Petition for Rulemaking, WT Docket No. 24-240, RM-11989, Public Notice, 39 FCC Rcd 8695 (2024). 96. In April 2025, the Commission adopted a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning the Lower 37 GHz band (37-37.6 GHz). Lower 37 GHz Band; Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz for Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No. 24-243, GN Docket No. 14-177, Report and Order, Sixth Report and Order, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd 3413 (2025) (Lower 37 GHz Band Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking). The Further Notice sought comment on potential changes to the limit on out-of-band emissions into the passive band below 37 GHz, potential improvements to the Lower 37 GHz coordination process by further automation or by incorporating clutter into the interference analysis, and the option of developing a dynamic spectrum management system for the band in the future. Lower 37 GHz Band Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd at 3413-14, para. 1; see also Press Release, FCC, FCC Clears Way for Wireless Innovation in Lower 37 GHz Band: New Framework Clarifies Spectrum Sharing Rules to Support Services Like Wireless Broadband and Internet of Things, (Apr. 28, 2025), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-411098A1.pdf. 97. In June and July 2024, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and the Office of Engineering and Technology, in partnership with NTIA and Department of War, announced that certified Spectrum Access System administrators could utilize a revised aggregate interference model to protect federal operations in the 3.5 GHz band, the result of which authorizes service to approximately 72 million more people nationwide without periodic service adjustments to protect federal operations. Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and Office of Engineering and Technology Announce Modified Aggregate Interference Model Used by Spectrum Access System Administrators, GN Docket Nos. 17-258 and 15-319, Public Notice, 39 FCC Rcd 6493 (WTB/OET 2024); Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and Office of Engineering and Technology Approve Certified SAS Administrators to Use Modified Aggregate Interference Model, GN Docket Nos. 17-258 and 15-319, Public Notice, 39 FCC Rcd 7007 (WTB/OET 2024). In August 2024, the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing updates to the rules governing the Citizens Broadband Radio Service and seeking comment on a variety of issues impacting 3.5 GHz band users. Promoting Investment in the 3550-3700 MHz Band, GN Docket No. 17-258, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Declaratory Ruling, 39 FCC Rcd 9775 (2024) (CBRS Notice). In May 2025, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and the Office of Engineering and Technology granted a conditional waiver to Samsung and Ericsson that allows them to manufacture, market, and sell multiband devices capable of operating in both the 3.5 GHz band and the 3.7 GHz service. WTB & OET Seek Comment on Samsung Waiver of Sections 96.41 and 2.947; Ericsson Petition for Waiver of Sections 96.41 and 2.947, WT Docket Nos. 23-93 and 25-159, Order, 40 FCC Rcd 3011 (2025). 98. In the Spectrum and Secure Technology and Innovation Act of 2024, Congress directed the Commission to initiate a system of competitive bidding to grant licenses for spectrum in its inventory in the AWS-3 spectrum bands. Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025, Pub. L. No. 118-159, Div. E, Title LIV, § 5401-5405 (Spectrum and Secure Technology and Innovation Act), § 5403 (mandating that the Commission initiate a system of competitive bidding for licenses for unassigned AWS-3 spectrum within 18 months of Dec. 23, 2024) (2024), https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/housebill/5009. In February 2025, the Commission began a proceeding to satisfy this Congressional mandate. Enhancing National Security Through the Auction of AWS-3 Spectrum Licenses, et al., GN Docket Nos. 25-70, 25-71, and 13-185, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd 1785 (2025); see also FCC Seeks Comment on Auction of AWS-3 Licenses, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 1479 (2025). OEA and WTB sought comment on the competitive bidding procedures and auction design for the AWS-3 licenses in inventory. In July 2025, the Commission released a Report and Order updating AWS-3 auction bidding credit rules to reflect legislative and regulatory developments since the spectrum was originally auctioned in 2014. See Enhancing National Security Through the Auction of AWS-3 Spectrum Licenses; Applying New Average Annual Gross Revenue Benchmarks for Small Business Bidding Credits; Amendment of the Commission’s Rules with Regard to Commercial Operations in the 1695-1710 MHz, 1755-1780 MHz, and 2155-2180 MHz Bands, GN Docket Nos. 25-70, 25-71, and 13-185, Report and Order and Second Report and Order, 40 FCC Rcd 5544 (2025); see also Press Release, FCC, FCC Moves Closer to its Next Spectrum Auction; Commission’s Rules for AWS-3 Auction Pave the Way for Approximately 200 Spectrum Licenses to Come to Market (July 24, 2025), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-413205A1.pdf. In December 2025, the Office of Economics and Analytics, jointly with the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, released a Public Notice announcing procedures for the auction of AWS-3 licenses. Auction of Advanced Services (AWS-3) Licenses; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Procedures for Auction 113; Bidding Scheduled to Begin June 2, 2026, AU Docket No. 25-117, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 10097 (WTB/OEA 2025).   Auction proceeds will support the Commission’s Supply Chain Reimbursement Program, which implements the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 by reimbursing eligible advanced communications service providers for their costs to remove, replace, and dispose of untrustworthy Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation equipment and services. Spectrum and Secure Technology and Innovation Act § 5404(b)(2)(A), (c)(1). 99. In February 2026, the Commission adopted a Report and Order that will enable broadband deployment on all ten megahertz of the 900 MHz band. Review of the Commission’s Rules Governing the 896-901/935-940 MHz Band, WT Docket No. 24-99, Report and Order, FCC 26-9 (Feb. 19, 2026). The Report and Order adopted new rules that will facilitate additional spectrum access for utilities, critical infrastructure, and enterprise businesses interested in wide-area, private wireless broadband networks. The rules will allow eligible existing 900 MHz licensees to transition to a paired five-megahertz broadband channel license through a market-driven transition process. This new 5/5 900 MHz licensing framework gives operators the flexibility to leverage broadband capacity for more advanced private wireless networks capable of providing innovative services and meeting increased communications needs across a range of sectors that stimulate the American economy. 2. Access to Direct-to-Device Spectrum 100. Deployment of D2D satellite service is expanding the reach of communications services, including emergency services, to more remote places. D2D is shorthand for spaced-based coverage directly to consumer end user devices, which can be authorized by the Commission through either a conventional Mobile Satellite Spectrum (MSS) license or Supplemental Coverage from Space (SCS) authorization. Press Release, FCC, FCC Clears the Way for American Leadership in Next-Gen, Direct-to-Device Connectivity (Apr. 23, 2026), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-398A1.pdf. Such space-based D2D connectivity will spur advancements in cutting-edge, space-based technologies and promote the innovative and efficient use of our nation’s spectrum resources in ways that foster creative collaboration among users. The Commission’s SCS rules are a world-leading framework to push forward such D2D capabilities. In March 2024, the Commission issued the Single Network Future: Supplemental Coverage from Space Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, establishing a U.S. framework for SCS that enables expanded coverage to a terrestrial licensee’s subscribers through collaboration with a satellite operator. Single Network Future: Supplemental Coverage from Space, Space Innovation, GN Docket No. 23-65, IB Docket No. 22-271, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 39 FCC Rcd 2622 (2024) (Supplemental Coverage from Space Report and Order). 101. In March 2024, the Commission adopted a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to facilitate the integration of satellite and terrestrial networks by creating a new regulatory framework for SCS. Supplemental Coverage from Space Report and Order, 39 FCC Rcd at 2623, para.1. The Commission largely adopted the rules proposed in the March 2023 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding. Single Network Future: Supplemental Coverage from Space; Space Innovation, GN Docket No. 23-65 et al., Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 38 FCC Rcd 2790 (2023). Through this approach, satellite operators collaborating with terrestrial service providers are able to obtain Commission authorization to operate space stations on certain flexible-use spectrum bands previously allocated only to terrestrial services. Supplemental Coverage from Space Report and Order, 39 FCC Rcd at 2623, para. 4. The SCS framework enables expanded coverage for the terrestrial licensees’ subscribers, especially in remote, unserved, and underserved areas, and has increased the availability of emergency communications. See id. at 2623-24, para. 1-6. 102. In November 2024, the Space Bureau and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau authorized SpaceX and T-Mobile to provide SCS on T-Mobile’s PCS G block licenses. Space Exploration Holdings, LLC Request for Deployment and Operating Authority for the SpaceX Gen2 NGSO Satellite System, ICFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-20200526-00055 et al., Order and Authorization, 39 FCC Rcd 12550 (SB 2024). On March 7, 2025, the Space Bureau and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau conditionally granted SpaceX’s request for waiver of section 25.202(k)(1) of the Commission’s SCS rules, thereby permitting aggregate out-of-band emissions (OOBE) in the United States at a power flux density (PFD) level up to -110.6 dBW/m2/MHz. Space Bureau and Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seek Comment on Filings of SpaceX and T-Mobile Requesting to Establish Supplemental Coverage from Space et al., GN Docket No. 23-135, Order, 40 FCC Rcd 1521, 1521, para. 1 (SB/WTB 2025) (SpaceX-T-Mobile 2025 Waiver Order). The Bureaus found that this action would protect adjacent band networks from harmful interference while ensuring that consumers and first responders can use an increasingly robust set of features even in the most challenging circumstances, and will avoid placing artificial caps on the number of satellites used to provide SCS for terrestrial networks. SpaceX-T-Mobile 2025 Waiver Order, 40 FCC Rcd at 1521, 1525-26, paras. 1, 11-14. 103. In April 2025, the Space Bureau and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau authorized Lynk Global, Inc. (Lynk) and Docomo Pacific, Inc. (Docomo) to provide SCS on the 845.1-845.3 MHz and 890.1-890.3 MHz bands pursuant to Lynk’s lease with Docomo. Satellite Licensing Division and Satellite Programs and Policy Division Information Actions Taken, Report No. SAT-01916, Public Notice, DA No. 25-385, 1 (May 2, 2025); ICFS File No. SAT-MOD-20240108-00006 et al.; ULS File No. 0011316969. In authorizing SCS to Lynk/Docomo, the Space Bureau and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau granted on their own motion a waiver of the requirement that Docomo hold all co-channel licenses throughout geographic independent area, which allows for the joint provision of SCS across Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. ICFS File No. SAT-MOD-20240108-00006 et al.; ULS File No. 0011316969. 104. In April 2026, the Space Bureau, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, the Office of Engineering and Technology, and the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (collectively the Bureaus) authorized AST to provide SCS on the 698-716 MHz, 728-746 MHz, 824-849 MHz, and 869-894 MHz bands pursuant to AST’s leases with AT&T and Verizon and on the 758-768 MHz and 788-798 MHz bands pursuant to AST’s agreement with FirstNet. AST & Science, LLC et al., ICFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-20200413-00034 et al., SB Docket No. 25-201, Authorization and Order, DA 26-391 (SB/WTB/OET/PSHSB Apr. 21, 2026) (AST SCS Order). In authorizing SCS, the Bureaus granted AST, AT&T, and Verizon’s requests for waivers of the requirement that AT&T and Verizon hold all co-channel licenses across the contiguous United States (CONUS) and of the cellular service area boundary rules. Id. These two waivers allow for the joint provision of SCS across CONUS and Hawaii while promoting coexistence with other terrestrial licenses. Id. 105. In April 2026, the Office of Engineering and Technology and the Space Bureau waived, on their own motion, certain equipment authorization requirements regarding SCS end user devices. Single Network Future: Supplemental Coverage from Space, GN Docket No. 23-65, Order, DA 26-380 (OET/SB Apr. 22, 2026). This action proactively extends relief previously granted to SCS operators while the Commission’s proposal to remove the rules remains pending. See Space Modernization for the 21st Century, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, SB Docket No. 25-306, 40 FCC Rcd 8191, 8218-89, para. 77 (2025). 106. In April 2026, the Space Bureau took a major step to preserve the regulatory certainty necessary for long-term investment in D2D. The Space Bureau released a decision that reaffirms existing mobile satellite service licensees’ exclusive rights to use certain D2D spectrum bands by dismissing the requests of several operators to enter those same bands as well as dismissing two petitions for rulemaking covering access to this same spectrum. SpaceX Holdings LLC et al., Order, DA 26-398 (SB Apr. 23, 2026). This action will help create a regulatory environment that will allow the growing market for D2D services to develop throughout the United States. 107. Two recent transaction approvals further facilitate D2D operations. As noted above, the approval of the SpaceX-EchoStar transaction in May 2026 was a major step in advancing the availability of D2D service, as the assignment of spectrum to SpaceX has the potential to benefit consumers nationwide by increasing the capacity of SpaceX’s D2D service, which will help close coverage gaps, and provide increased capacity, reduced latency, and broader service coverage. See infra Section V.B (discussing SpaceX-EchoStar transaction). The application for SpaceX’s new NGSO system to use this spectrum for D2D remains pending. Space Bureau and Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Accept for Filing Application of SpaceX Requesting NGSO MSS Authorization and Supplemental Coverage from Space Authorization and Seek Comment on Waivers, GN Docket 25-340, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 9358 (SB/WTB Dec. 5, 2025). In addition, the approval of the Grain-T-Mobile transaction in July 2026, as noted above, provides incentives for Grain to partner with D2D operators in the near term. See infra Section V.B (discussing Grain-T-Mobile transaction). 3. Access to Satellite Spectrum 108. The Commission is aggressively pursuing spectrum abundance as part of its agenda to secure U.S. leadership in space and supercharge the possibilities for satellite broadband. At the same time, the Commission is focused on expediting space application processing and simplifying the rules to promote satellite broadband deployment. Together, these efforts will facilitate private sector operators’ deployment of space-based broadband services in the United States. To this end, the Commission has taken a number of actions since the last Section 706 Report to promote spectrum availability for satellite broadband, and facilitate infrastructure builds. 109. On May 22, 2025, the Commission released a combined Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which initiated a proceeding to seek comment on expanding satellite connectivity across four spectrum bands: 12.7-13.25 GHz, 42.0-42.5 GHz, 51.4-52.4 GHz, and within certain “W-Band” frequency ranges (92.0-94.0 GHz, 94.1-100 GHz, 102.0-109.5 GHz, and 111.8-114.25 GHz). Satellite Spectrum Abundance, Expanding Use of the 12.7-13.25 GHz Band for Mobile Broadband or Other Expanded Use; Shared Use of the 42-42.5 GHz Band; Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz for Mobile Radio Services, SB Docket No. 25-180, GN Docket No. 22-352, WT Docket No. 23-158, GN Docket No. 14-177, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd 3794 (2025) (Satellite Spectrum Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking). Previously, the Commission had sought comment on ways that the 12.7 GHz band and 42 GHz band could be used more intensively by terrestrial wireless communications to achieve the goals of promoting technological innovation, the growth of the nation’s economy, and greater connectivity for the American public. Satellite Spectrum Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd at 3795, para. 2; see also Expanding Flexible Use of the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band; Expanding Use of the 12.7-13.25 GHz Band for Mobile Broadband or Other Expanded Use, WT Docket No. 20-443, GN Docket No. 22-352, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 38 FCC Rcd 5283 (2023); see also Shared Use of the 42.0-42.5 GHz Band; Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz for Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No. 23-158, GN Docket No. 14-177, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 38 FCC Rcd 6362 (2023). The Commission’s Further Notice seeks comment on ways that these bands could be used more intensively by satellite communications, as an alternative or a complement to the previous proposals for terrestrial wireless communications in these bands. Satellite Spectrum Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd 3796-3815, paras. 5-55. 110. On October 28, 2025 the Commission sought comment on ways to facilitate more intensive use in the Upper Microwave Flexible Use (UMFUS) spectrum bands in order to give satellite operators far greater flexibility while protecting wireless operations. Facilitating More Intensive Use of Upper Microwave Spectrum, SB Docket No. 25-305, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 40 FCC Rcd 8401 (2025) (UMFUS NPRM). Nearly a decade ago, the Commission set rules for siting earth stations in these bands. See Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz For Mobile Radio Services, et al., GN Docket No. 14-177, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 31 FCC Rcd 8014 (2016). Since then, demand by the space sector for spectrum has skyrocketed, including for use of these bands. See UMFUS NPRM, 40 FCC Rcd at 8406-08, paras. 13-17. This proposal reviews a wide range of reforms to the Commission’s earth station siting rules to more intensively use these spectrum bands and to streamline the earth station licensing process. 111. On December 10, 2025, the Space Bureau issued a Public Notice to refresh the record on proposed rules to permit the use of additional frequency bands for NGSO satellites to communicate with Earth Stations in Motion (ESIMs) in the 28.35-28.6 GHz band. Space Bureau Seeks to Refresh the Record on Proposed Rules to Permit the Use of Additional Frequency Bands for NGSO Satellites to Communicate with Earth Stations in Motion, IB Docket Nos. 17-95 and 18-315, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 9883 (SB 2025); see also Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the Commission’s Rules to Facilitate the Use of Earth Stations in Motion Communicating with Geostationary Orbit Space Stations in Frequency Bands Allocated to the Fixed Satellite Service, et. al, Second Report and Order in IB Docket No. 17-95 and Report and Order in IB Docket No. 18-315 and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 35 FCC Rcd 5137, 5159-60 (2020); See also NGSO ESIM Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; see also Federal Communications Commission, Earth Stations in Motion, 85 Fed. Reg. 44818 (July 24, 2020) (announcing the comment period ending on August. 24, 2020 and the reply comment period ending on September 22, 2020). ESIMs include earth stations operating on vessels, aircraft, and vehicles. See 47 CFR § 25.103. The demand for high quality broadband services via satellite to remote, unserved or underserved areas continues to expand. D. Universal Service Support 1. Creating Incentives for Broadband Deployment in High-Cost Areas 112. Since the beginning of 2024 through year-end 2025, across our high-cost fixed programs, we have incentivized broadband deployment to approximately 1,700,000 housing units and ensured ongoing service at 3,200,000 housing units. The following is a breakdown by program: Fig. 17 Housing Units Deployed and Supported at 100/20 Mbps Across Fixed High-Cost Programs 2024-2025 The table contains estimates based on year-end reporting by carriers in USAC’s High Cost Universal Broadband (HUBB) portal. Amounts are rounded and deployment figures are subject to change based on USAC’s review process and carrier revisions. For AK Plan, A-CAM I, A-CAM II, and Enhanced A-CAM, support is also for maintaining service as required under the program. Fund A-CAM I & II refers to Alternative Connect America Cost Model I and II (including Revised A-CAM I), CAF BLS refers to CAF Broadband Loop Support, RDOF refers to the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund, PR Fund refers to Bringing Puerto Rico Together, and Enhanced A-CAM refers to Enhanced Alternative Connect America Cost Model. Housing Units Deployed at 100/20 Mbps or Greater, 2024-2025 Housing Units Supported at 100/20 Mbps or Greater as of Year-End 2025 Total Housing Units Annual Support A-CAM I & II 20,000 470,000 500,000 $390,000,000 Alaska Plan 5,000 14,000 20,000 $166,000,000 CAF BLS 130,000 980,000 1,100,000 $1,100,000,000 CAF II Auction 130,000 280,000 400,000 $144,000,000 RDOF 1,200,000 600,000 1,800,000 $564,000,000 PR Fund 90,000 800,000 890,000 $13,000,000 Connect USVI 20,000 0 20,000 $7,000,000 Enhanced A-CAM 160,000 20,000 180,000 $1,256,000,000 Total 1,700,000 3,200,000 4,900,000 $3,639,000,000 113. Rural Digital Opportunity Fund. The Commission started authorizing Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) funding for approved applicants on September 15, 2021, Rural Digital Opportunity Fund Support Authorized for 466 Winning Bids, AU Docket No. 20-34, WC Docket Nos. 19-126 and 10-90, Public Notice, 36 FCC Rcd 13574 (OEA/WCB 2021). authorizing a total of 17 waves of support, which concluded on January 13, 2023. Rural Digital Opportunity Fund Support Authorized for 1,764 Winning Bids, AU Docket No. 20-34, WC Docket Nos. 19-126 and 10-90, Public Notice, 38 FCC Rcd 101 (OEA/WCB 2023). As of June 8, 2026, approximately $5.750 billion in RDOF auction support is currently authorized to be distributed for more than 3.2 million estimated locations nationwide. FCC, Auction 904: Rural Digital Opportunity Fund, https://www.fcc.gov/auction/904 (Results Tab, “Historical Authorized Auction 904 Long-Form Applicants Data”) (last visited Aug. 11, 2026) (Historical RDOF Authorizations Summary); id. (Results Tab, “Post-Authorization Default Summary”) (RDOF Post-Authorization Defaults Summary). RDOF is a 10-year support program, 47 CFR § 54.802(b). and authorized RDOF auction winners have committed to providing 1 Gbps/500 Mbps service to roughly 98% of locations being funded. See Historical RDOF Authorizations Summary; RDOF Post-Authorization Defaults Summary. 114. Connect America Fund Phase II Auction. In 2018, the Connect America Fund Phase II auction awarded $1.488 billion over 10 years to 103 winning bidders to serve more than 713,000 rural homes and businesses. Connect America Fund Phase II Auction Scheduled for July 24, 2018 Notice and Filing Requirements and Other Procedures for Auction 903, AU Docket No. 17-182, WC Docket No. 10-90, Public Notice, 33 FCC Rcd 1428 (2018); 220 Applicants Qualified to Bid in the Connect America Fund Phase II Auction (Auction 903); Bidding to Begin on July 24, 2018, AU Docket No. 17-182, WC Docket No. 10-90, Public Notice, 33 FCC Rcd 6171 (2018) (announcing the qualified bidders for the auction and confirming timing); Connect America Fund Phase II Auction (Auction 903) Closes; Winning Bidders Announced, AU Docket No. 17-182, WC Docket No. 10-90, Public Notice, 33 FCC Rcd 8257 (2018). The Commission began authorizing Phase II auction funding in May 2019, Press Release, FCC, FCC Authorizes First Wave of Funding for Rural Broadband from Connect America Fund Auction (May 14, 2019), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-357434A1.pdf. authorizing a total of 17 waves of support which concluded on November 17, 2022. Connect America Fund Phase II Auction Support Authorized for 1 Winning Bid, AU Docket No. 17-182, WC Docket No. 10-90, Public Notice (WCB Nov. 17, 2022). As of June 8, 2026, more than $1.4 billion in Phase II auction funding is currently authorized to be distributed to expand connectivity to over 680,000 homes and small businesses nationwide. FCC, Connect America Fund Phase II Auction (Auction 903), https://www.fcc.gov/auction/903 (Data Tab, “Historical Authorized Auction 903 Long-Form Applicants Data”) (Aug. 11, 2026); id. (Data Tab, “Post-Authorization Default Summary”). 115. Bringing Puerto Rico Together and Connect USVI Funds. In June 2021, the Commission authorized funding for the winning proposals from Stage 2 of the Bringing Puerto Rico Together Fund and Connect USVI Fund competitive proposal processes—$127.1 million and $84.5 million, respectively. Wireline Competition Bureau Authorizes Stage 2 Support for Puerto Rico Telephone Company and Liberty Communications of Puerto Rico, WC Docket Nos. 18-143 and 10-90, Public Notice, 36 FCC Rcd 9914 (WCB, 2021) (Bringing Puerto Rico Together Winning Applicant Announcement); Connect USVI Fund Stage 2 Support Authorized for Broadband VI, WC Docket Nos. 18-143 and 10-90, Public Notice, 36 FCC Rcd 9405 (WCB 2021) (USVI Fund Winning Applicant Announcement). This funding provides support over a 10-year period for deployment of fixed voice and broadband services. Bringing Puerto Rico Together Stage 2 funding supports fixed deployment of service at a minimum speed of 100/20 Mbps, with service obligations at many funded locations of at least 1 Gbps/500 Mbps. See Bringing Puerto Rico Together Winning Applicant Announcement, 36 FCC Rcd at 9914, para. 1 (identifying Puerto Rico Telephone Co., Inc. (PRTC) and Liberty Communications of Puerto Rico (Liberty) as the winning applicants); PRTC Uniendo a Puerto Rico Fund Stage 2 Fixed Support Application Form, WC Docket Nos. 18-143 and 10-90, Initial Overview at 1 (filed June 22, 2021) (PRTC Network Description); Liberty Uniendo a Puerto Rico Fund Stage 2 Fixed Support Application Form, WC Docket Nos. 18-143 and 10-90, Initial Overview at 4 (filed June 22, 2021) (Liberty Network Description). We refer to the Bringing Puerto Rico Together Winning Applicant Announcement, PRTC Network Description, and Liberty Network Description together as the Bringing Puerto Rico Together Broadband Speed Requirements. In the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Connect USVI Stage 2 support will result in fixed deployment of 1 Gbps/500 Mbps service to all funded locations. See USVI Fund Winning Applicant Announcement, 36 FCC Rcd at 9405, para. 1 (identifying Broadband VI as the winning applicant); Broadband VI Uniendo a Puerto Rico Fund Connect USVI Fund Stage 2 Fixed Support Application Form, WC Dockets Nos. 18-143 and WC 10-90, Initial Overview at 1 (filed June 11, 2021) (together with the USVI Fund Winning Applicant Announcement, the USVI Fund Broadband Speed Requirements). In June 2020, the Commission similarly authorized a total of $258.8 million in funding to wireless carriers participating in Stage 2 of the Bringing Puerto Rico Together Fund and the Connect USVI Fund to facilitate the restoration, hardening, and expansion of mobile networks capable of providing 4G LTE and 5G-NR services over a three-year term. Wireline Competition Bureau Authorizes Stage 2 Mobile Support for Certain Providers Participating in the Uniendo a Puerto Rico Fund and the Connect USVI Fund, WC Docket Nos. 18-143 and 10-90, Public Notice, 35 FCC Rcd 6321, 6324, Attach. A (WCB 2020) (authorizing support for AT&T Mobility, PRTC, and T-Mobile in Puerto Rico, and AT&T Mobility in the U.S. Virgin Islands); Wireline Competition Bureau Authorizes Stage 2 Mobile Support for T-Mobile in Puerto Rico, WC Docket Nos. 18-143 and 10-90, Public Notice, 35 FCC Rcd 10303, 10305, Attach. A (WCB 2020) (authorizing additional mobile support in September 2020 for T-Mobile based on its acquisition of PR Wireless, LLC); Wireline Competition Bureau Authorizes Stage 2 Mobile Support for Viya in the U.S. Virgin Islands, WC Docket Nos. 18-143 and 10-90, Public Notice, 35 FCC Rcd 11555, 11557, Attach. A (WCB 2020) (authorizing support to Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. d/b/a Viya). Carriers must restore network coverage in the territories to at least pre-hurricane levels by the conclusion of the support period, providing outdoor transmission rates of at least 10 Mbps download and 1 Mbps upload speeds for 4G LTE and 35/3 Mbps for 5G-NR service. 47 CFR §§ 54.1509(c), 54.1514(b)(1). On Oct. 28, 2022, in light of damage caused by hurricanes in the fall of 2022, the Commission released a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to extend by 24 months (until December 2025) the phase-down of frozen support for incumbent fixed providers in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands for the areas in which they were not awarded long-term support for broadband services, as well as the end of mobile support in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The Uniendo a Puerto Rico Fund and the Connect USVI Fund; Connect America Fund, WC Docket Nos. 18-143 and 10-90, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 37 FCC Rcd 13411 (2022). 116. In August 2024, the Commission continued its efforts to bolster mobile voice and broadband services throughout Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The Commission adopted its Second Report and Order for the 5G Fund, which includes eligible areas of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands in the program’s Phase I auction, thus establishing a competitive funding mechanism for the long-term expansion of next generation wireless services in the territories. Establishing a 5G Fund for Rural America, GN Docket No. 20-32, Second Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 39 FCC Rcd 9874, 9904-07, paras. 57-60 (2024) (2024 5G Fund Order). 117. Rural Broadband Accountability Plan. The Rural Broadband Accountability Plan (RBAP) seeks to monitor and ensure compliance for universal service high-cost programs, including the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund and Connect America Fund Phase II Auction. FCC, Rural Broadband Accountability Plan, https://www.fcc.gov/rbap (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). RBAP makes several changes and enhancements to existing audit and verification procedures, including significantly increasing the number of audits and verifications, initiating verifications earlier in the deployment process, and conducting on-site engineering audits. FCC, FACT SHEET: Rural Broadband Accountability Plan, https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-379729A1.pdf (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). The largest dollar recipients will be subject to an on-site audit in at least one state, and higher-risk recipients will be subject to additional audits and verifications. Id. Results of verifications, audits, and speed and latency performance testing are publicly available. Id. The Commission established the RBAP as part of an ongoing effort to increase accountability and to build upon existing audit and verification processes performed by USAC. Id. 118. Administrative Improvements to High-Cost Programs. In January 2025, the Wireline Competition Bureau adopted the Fabric as the basis we will rely on for generally verifying compliance with high-cost program deployment obligations and for adjusting the location obligations for certain high-cost support mechanisms. Connect America Fund et al., WC Docket No. 10-90 et al., Order, 40 FCC Rcd 281 (WCB 2025) (High-Cost Fabric Order). The Broadband DATA Act defines the Fabric as the “common dataset of all locations in the United States where fixed broadband internet access service can be installed, as determined by the Commission,” and directs that the Fabric “shall . . . serve as the foundation upon which all data relating to the availability of fixed broadband internet service . . . shall be reported and overlaid.” 47 U.S.C. § 642(b)(1)(A)(i), (B)(ii). As a result, certain high-cost programs have begun reporting their deployment in the High Cost Universal Broadband (HUBB) portal based on Fabric Location IDs rather than addresses and geocoordinates. See, e.g., FCC, HUBB Fabric ID Transition, https://www.fcc.gov/wireline-competition/HUBB-Transition (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). These efforts will help streamline reporting and facilitate interagency coordination efforts because other funding agencies also rely on Fabric data to identify potential overlaps in funding. High-Cost Fabric Order, 40 FCC Rcd at 285, para. 9. 119. Enhanced Alternative Connect America Cost Model Support. In July 2023, the Commission adopted the Enhanced Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-CAM) program as a voluntary path for supporting the widespread deployment of 100/20 Mbps broadband service throughout the rural areas served by carriers that had been receiving A-CAM support and in areas served by legacy rate-of-return support recipients. Connect America Fund, et al., WC Docket No. 10-90 et al., Report and Order, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and Notice of Inquiry, 38 FCC Rcd 7040, 7057-88, paras. 37-114 (2023) (Enhanced A-CAM Order). On October 30, 2023, the Wireline Competition Bureau announced that 368 rate-of-return companies had elected such offers. Wireline Competition Bureau Authorizes 368 Companies in 44 States to Receive Enhanced Alternative Connect America Cost Model Support to Expand Rural Broadband, WC Docket No. 10-90, Public Notice, 38 FCC Rcd 10304 (WCB 2023). On December 30, 2025, it announced the final list of locations to which electing carriers are required to deploy or maintain 100/20 Mbps service. Wireline Competition Bureau Announces Final Eligible Locations File and Support Amounts for Enhanced Alternative Connect America Model Mechanism, WC Docket No. 10-90, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 10280 (WCB 2025) (December 30th Final Locations Public Notice). Enhanced A-CAM will provide over $18 billion over a 15-year support period to deploy service to over 500,000 unserved locations and to maintain existing service at over 2 million locations. December 30th Final Locations Public Notice. 120. Legacy Rate-of-Return High-Cost Funding. In a July 2023 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission sought comment on how to address the immediate needs of legacy rate-of return support mechanisms, while balancing the Commission’s objectives of maintaining its commitment to supporting broadband at evolving levels of service and also avoiding unnecessary duplication of support in light of other available funding programs. Enhanced A-CAM Order, 38 FCC Rcd at 7089-7101, paras. 115-52. The Commission released an order in January 2025 further deferring the commencement of the next five-year deployment obligation term for legacy rate-of-return carriers receiving CAF Broadband Loop Support (BLS) until January 1, 2026 or until completion of the pending rulemaking proceeding where the Commission is considering general program reforms, whichever is later. Connect America Fund: A National Broadband Plan for our Future High-Cost Universal Service Support, WC Docket No. 10-90, Order, 40 FCC Rcd 535, para. 2 (WCB 2025). Legacy carriers remain subject to the Commission’s reporting and certification requirements, and the Commission’s broadband network performance testing and certification requirements. Id. at 544, para. 24. In the same order, the Commission clarified the process for validating certifications of deployment to all study area locations to mean those certifications for which 95% of the locations can be validated as served by the carrier using the National Broadband Map. Id. at 539-43, paras. 10-20. 121. High-Cost Program Reform. On May 21, 2026, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on updating its High-Cost Program to ensure that Universal Service Fund (USF) resources are spent efficiently to deliver high-speed broadband service in the areas where it is most needed. Reforming the High-Cost Program for an All-IP Future; Connect America Fund: A National Broadband Plan for our Future High-Cost Universal Support, WC Docket Nos. 26-96, 10-90, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 26-35 (May 21, 2026). The Commission seeks comment on updating its legacy high-cost mechanisms, namely, CAF Broadband Loop Support and High Cost Loop Support, and also seeks comment on what next steps, if any, should be taken with respect to the areas served by carriers receiving subsidies under the sunsetting Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-CAM) I, Revised A-CAM I, and A-CAM II mechanisms. Id. 122. Alaska Connect Fund. The Commission has also continued its work to ensure that fixed and mobile providers meet their commitments to serve remote Alaska in exchange for receiving high-cost support. On November 4, 2024, the Commission adopted a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking addressing continued high-cost Universal Service support for Alaska carriers receiving Alaska Plan support, Connect America Fund et al., WC Docket No. 16-271, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 31 FCC Rcd 10139, 10140, para. 1 (2016) (Alaska Plan Report and Order and Further Notice). CAF II support, or A-CAM support. Connect America Fund—Alaska Plan et al., WC Docket Nos. 16-271, 23-328 et al., Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 39 FCC Rcd 12099 (2024) (2024 ACF Order); see also Connect America Fund—Alaska Plan et al., WC Docket Nos. 16-271, 23-328 et al., Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Report and Order, 38 FCC Rcd 9982 (2023) (2023 ACF NPRM). Due to the various ending dates of these separate programs, the Commission’s Order adopted the Alaska Connect Fund (ACF), All references to the next phase or version of the Alaska Plan in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Report and Order are references to Alaska Connect Fund or ACF. 2023 ACF NPRM, 38 FCC Rcd at 9983, para. 1 & n.1. a single support program, to address the next ten years of high-cost support for fixed and mobile carriers serving high-cost areas of Alaska. 2023 ACF NPRM, 38 FCC Rcd at 10011-38, paras. 63-126. For all current fixed carrier support recipients, the Commission authorized approximately $107.6 million annually (a one-time 30% increase), beginning in January 2025 through December 2028. Support recipient deployment obligations did not change, and all deployment must be completed by the originally scheduled dates. As of the time of the 2024 ACF Order, carriers together had reported deployment to over 96,000 locations. 2024 ACF Order, 39 FCC Rcd at 1211-16, paras. 24-25, 34. During this time, the Commission will evaluate the outcome of BEAD and other federal support programs in Alaska and finalize the eligibility, public interest obligations and support for the Fixed ACF support program (2029-2034). Id. at 1211-16, paras. 24-25, 34. 123. For mobile carriers, the Commission authorized approximately $96 million annually in mobile support (a 30% increase) also beginning in January 2025 and continuing through December 2034. For mobile service, Alaska Connect Fund support will be based on Broadband Data Collection mobile coverage data. Id. at 12102, para. 6. In addition, in August 2024, the Commission modified the 5G Fund rules to account for the use of BDC data, and other related rules to improve accountability in the high-cost program. See generally 2024 5G Fund Order, 39 FCC Rcd 9874 (2024); Establishing a 5G Fund for Rural America, GN Docket No. 20-32, Report and Order, 35 FCC Rcd 12174 (2020), modified by Errata released Nov. 10, 2020, Nov. 27, 2020, and Jan. 11, 2021. The terms and goal speeds for mobile support under the Alaska Connect Fund will be based on whether an eligible area has a single or multiple subsidized providers. For eligible areas where there is only one subsidized provider (single-support areas), the current provider will continue receiving support through the end of 2034 and will be expected to enter into a new performance plan with 5G service where technically and financially feasible. For eligible areas with multiple subsidized providers (duplicate-support areas), the Commission adopted a two-phased approach to resolve duplicative support: (1) an Alaska Connect Fund Mobile Phase I (ACF Mobile Phase I) that extends support for the mobile providers receiving support in these duplicate-support areas under the current Alaska Plan until December 31, 2029; and (2) an Alaska Connect Fund Mobile Phase II (ACF Mobile Phase II) that would provide a single provider in those areas with support through the end of 2034. 2024 ACF Order, 39 FCC Rcd at 12102-03, para. 6. In September 2025, the Commission released an Alaska Connect Fund Order on Reconsideration and Clarification, Alaska Plan Waiver Order, and Order, Alaska Connect Fund, WC Docket Nos. 10-90, 23-328, 16-271, 09-197; WT Docket No. 10-208, Order on Reconsideration and Clarification, Alaska Plan Waiver Order, and Order, 40 FCC Rcd 7716 (2025) (ACF Order on Reconsideration). which addressed a Petition for Clarification and Reconsideration filed by GCI in January 2025, as well as a second petition by GCI which sought modification or waiver of two Bureau-level methodologies adopted to determine mobile providers’ compliance with their obligations under the Alaska Plan, GCI Communication Corp. Petition for Modification or Waiver of Portion of the Alaska Population-Distribution Model to Permit Use of the Broadband Serviceable Location Fabric for the Alaska Plan Mobile Compliance and for a Waiver to Revise the Mobile Waterfall Methodology, WC Docket No. 16-271 (filed Apr. 14, 2025) (GCI AK Plan Petition), https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041111257902/1. and other matters related to the Alaska mobile high-cost programs. ACF Order on Reconsideration, 40 FCC Rcd at 7718, para. 4. 124. Other Federal Programs. As discussed in a variety of contexts in this Report, the Commission’s efforts to provide high-cost USF support for broadband service are part of, and conducted in concert (and coordination) with, a variety of other federal programs that provide financial support for broadband. The largest of these programs is NTIA’s BEAD Program, for which Congress allocated $42.45 billion in the Infrastructure Act to states for grants “to bridge the digital divide.” Infrastructure Act, div. F, tit. I, § 60102(b)(1), 135 Stat. at 1184. On June 26, 2023, the BEAD Program allocations for all 50 states and the U.S. Territories were announced. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Biden-Harris Administration Announces State Allocations for $42.45 Billion High-Speed Internet Grant Program as Part of Investing in America Agenda (June 26, 2023), https://www.ntia.gov/press-release/2023/biden-harris-administration-announces-state-allocations-4245-billion-high-speed. NTIA has approved most of the states and territories’ proposals to access BEAD funds. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Public Resources related to BEAD Plans and Milestones, https://broadbandusa.ntia.gov/public-resources-related-bead-plans-and-milestones (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). NTIA also administers the $1 billion Enabling Middle Mile Broadband Infrastructure Program, also created by the Infrastructure Act, which funds middle mile infrastructure used to connect local, regional, and national networks, as well as anchor institutions such as schools, libraries, medical and healthcare providers, and various institutions of higher education. See Infrastructure Act, div. F, tit. I, § 60401, 135 Stat. at 1231. For award routes and project information, see National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Funding Recipients, https://broadbandusa.ntia.doc.gov/funding-programs/enabling-middle-mile-broadband-infrastructure-program/funding-recipients (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). Further, NTIA administers the Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program, a program used for broadband deployment on tribal lands, as well as for telehealth, distance learning, broadband affordability, and digital inclusion recently funded through $1 billion and $2 billion appropriations in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, and Infrastructure Act, respectively. See National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program, https://broadbandusa.ntia.doc.gov/funding-programs/tribal-broadband-connectivity (last visited Aug. 11, 2026); Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Pub. L. No. 116-260, div. N, tit. IX, § 905, 134 Stat. 1182, 2136 (2020); Infrastructure Act, div. F, tit. II, § 60201, 135 Stat. at 1208-09. 125. The U.S. Department of Treasury administers two programs that provide funding that covers a range of different uses, including supporting the deployment of broadband infrastructure—the $10 billion Capital Projects Fund, which funds longer term “critical capital projects,” American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 § 9901(a), Pub. L. No. 117-2, 135 Stat. 4, 223, 233 (2021) (ARPA) (adding 42 U.S.C. § 804 to create and fund the Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund); U.S. Department of Treasury, Capital Projects Fund, https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/capital-projects-fund (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). and the $350 billion State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, which provide support for the response to and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. ARPA § 9901(a), 135 Stat. at 223, 228 (adding 42 U.S.C. § 802 and § 803 to create and fund the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, respectively); U.S. Department of Treasury, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/state-and-local-fiscal-recovery-funds (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). In addition to its historic grant and loan programs, See USDA, Rural Development, Telecom Programs, https://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/telecommunications-programs (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). the USDA’s Rural Utilities Service administers the ReConnect Program, reauthorized by the Infrastructure Act, Infrastructure Act, div. J, tit. I, 135 Stat. at 1351. which provides loans, grants, and loan-grant combinations to bring high-speed Internet to rural areas that lack sufficient access to broadband. ReConnect Program funds can be used to fund the costs of construction, improvement, or acquisition of facilities and equipment needed to provide broadband service. USDA, Rural Development, ReConnect Loan and Grant Program, https://www.usda.gov/reconnect (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). 2. Supporting Broadband Access for Schools and Health Care Providers 126. E-Rate. The E-Rate Program provides universal service support to ensure the availability of advanced telecommunications and information services to and within eligible schools and libraries. 47 U.S.C. § 254(h)(1)(B). Demand for E-Rate program support in funding year 2025 was $3.225 billion, with $1.806 billion for category one services and $1.418 billion for category two services. Letter from Bernie Manns, Senior Director, Schools and Libraries Division, USAC, to Trent Harkrader, Bureau Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, FCC (Mar. 27, 2025) (on file in CC Docket No. 02-6). In June 2025, the Wireline Competition Bureau announced the updated category two multipliers and funding floors for the five-year cycle beginning funding year (FY) 2026. Wireline Competition Bureau Announces E-Rate Category Two Funding Floors and Multipliers for Next Funding Cycle, WC Docket No. 13-184, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 3887 (WCB 2025). Category two services provide connectivity within the school or library building, and include internal connections, managed internal broadband services, and basic maintenance of internal connections. The Public Notice applied a 20.7% inflation rate adjustment for the upcoming five-year cycle for FY 2026-FY 2030, and reminded applicants that they will be required to validate their student counts or library square footage in the first year they apply for category two support during the new five-year cycle. Id. at 3888. 127. Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot Program. The Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot Program was created to study the effectiveness of providing up to $200 million in support to participating eligible schools and libraries for cybersecurity equipment and services over a three-year period. Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot Program, WC Docket No. 23-234, Report and Order, 39 FCC Rcd 6158 (2024). Pilot participants were required to complete and submit a Pilot FCC Form 471 to request discounts on Pilot-eligible services and equipment, and submit Part 2 of the FCC Form 484 with additional cybersecurity information, by the September 15, 2025 application filing deadline. Wireline Competition Bureau Announces Selection of Cybersecurity Pilot Program Participants and Provides Additional Information Regarding Program Requirements, WC Docket No. 23-234, Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd 392, 399 (WCB 2025). The first wave of Funding Commitment Decision Letters was released on December 17, 2025, Universal Service Administrative Company, Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot Program Newsletter (Jan. 5, 2026), https://www.usac.org/wp-content/uploads/e-rate/documents/cyber_pilot/newsletters/2026-January-CyberPilot-Newsletter-v2.pdf. and remaining funding requests are being reviewed on a rolling basis. 128. Rural Health Care Program. The Rural Health Care (RHC) Program provides universal service support through two component programs: (1) the Telecommunications Program and (2) the Healthcare Connect Fund (HCF) Program. Demand for RHC Program support continues to grow, with gross demand across both programs rising to $787 million for funding year 2025, which represents a 4.5% increase for each program over funding year 2024. See Letter from Mark Sweeney, Vice President, Rural Health Care, USAC, to Joseph S. Calascione, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, FCC (June 25, 2025) (on file in WC Docket No. 02-60). The number of health care providers participating in the HCF Program in funding year 2025 was 14,436, USAC, USAC Open Data, https://opendata.usac.org/ (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). The number of participating health care providers was determined by downloading a copy of the Commitment and Disbursements data set for Funding Year 2025, removing duplicates, sorting by program, and counting the total number rows for each program. while 936 health care providers participated in the Telecom Program in funding year 2025. Id. 129. In November 2025, the Wireline Competition Bureau waived the Commission’s rules to permit the use of previously approved rural rates from funding years 2023-2025 for funding year 2026 that would otherwise require approval of a cost study-based justification. Promoting Telehealth in Rural America, WC Docket No. 17-310, Order, 40 FCC Rcd 8795, 8795, para. 1 (WCB 2025). Among other considerations, the Bureau concluded that it was not in the public interest to require service providers to absorb the administrative burdens resulting from the preparation of cost studies while the Commission continues to develop permanent rate-determination improvements. Id. at 3, para. 7. 130. Connected Care Pilot Program. The Connected Care Pilot Program was established to provide up to $100 million in USF support for eligible health care providers to operate three-year projects delivering connected care services, with a priority for those serving low-income patients and veterans. Federal Communications Commission Announces Final Set of Projects Selected for the Connected Care Program, WC Docket No. 18-213, Public Notice, 37 FCC Rcd 4358, 4358, para. 1 (2022). The Pilot Program funded selected pilot projects to cover 85% of the eligible costs for broadband connectivity, network equipment, and information services necessary to deliver connected care to patients. See Promoting Telehealth for Low-Income Consumers; COVID-19 Telehealth Program, WC Docket No. 18-213, Report and Order, 35 FCC Rcd 3366, 3384, para. 38 (2020) (Connected Care Report and Order). Funded projects were to be completed by Dec. 31, 2025, and the final deadline for submitting invoices for reimbursement is June 29, 2026. Promoting Telehealth for Low-Income Consumers, WC Docket No. 18-213, Order, 39 FCC Rcd 11691, 11691, para. 1 (WCB 2024). VI. SECTION 706 FINDING 131. In view of the evidence before us, we conclude, as the Commission has several times before, that advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion. See, e.g., 2021 Report, 36 FCC Rcd at 888, para. 103; 2019 Report, 34 FCC Rcd at 3896-97, para. 76; Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, GN Docket No. 07-45, Report, 23 FCC Rcd 9615, 9645, para. 59 (2008); Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, CC Docket No. 98-146, Third Report, 17 FCC Rcd 2844, 2881, para. 89 (2002); Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, CC Docket No. 98-146, Report, 14 FCC Rcd 2398, 2446, para. 91 (1999). The available data plainly demonstrate that impressive strides have been made in the deployment of advanced telecommunications capability since the 2024 Report. See, e.g., ACA Connects Comments at 3 (positing that “advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed on a reasonable and timely basis to all Americans,” and further noting that “[a]lmost all Americans have access to service that meets or exceeds the Commission’s 100/20 Mbps benchmark for fixed broadband, and rapid progress towards universal deployment continues.”) Wireline providers continue to aggressively roll out fiber optic networks, and 5G-NR mobile service continues to be deployed at a fast clip by multiple providers such that these services are available to nearly all Americans. See, e.g., RVA LLC Market Research & Consulting, 2025 North American FTTH Deployment and Market Update, at 6 (Dec. 17, 2025), https://fiberbroadband.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/25.fba_.RVA2025MarketReport.01.19.2026F.pdf (showing 11% growth in unique homes marketed from September 2024 to September 2025); CTIA Comments at 11 (“Approximately 99% of the U.S. population lives in areas with 4G LTE coverage, 96% of the population lives in areas with 5G coverage at 7/1 Mbps, and 91% of the population lives in areas with 5G coverage at 35/3 Mbps. . . . By the end of 2024, there were over 15,000 new cell towers activated and 447,600 total operational cell sites—the physical backbone of wireless networks—across the United States. This is a 110% increase since pivotal wireless siting reforms were enacted in 2018.”). Satellite service is also rapidly expanding. Starlink alone has reported a total of over 10,200 on-orbit broadband and mobile satellites and has a grown its global subscriber base from 6 million to 12 million between June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2026.. See Space Exploration Technologies Corp., Quarterly Report (Form 10-Q), at 34, 36 (Aug. 4, 2026) (total satellite deployments and subscriber counts, respectively), https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001181412/000162828026052535/spcx-20260630.htm. We discuss potential satellite capacity constraints above. See supra, Section IV.B.1. And other satellite providers have aggressively begun to launch their own satellite constellations to provide broadband to Americans since the 2024 Report. See, e.g., Rodriguez, Mau, The State of Satellite Connectivity (2025) (Nov. 6, 2025), https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2025/11/the-state-of-satellite-connectivity-2025; Kohnstamm, Thomas, Amazon News, Everything you need to know about Amazon Leo, Amazon’s satellite broadband network, Get answers to your questions about how Amazon will provide internet connectivity from space (Nov. 13, 2025), https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/innovation-at-amazon/what-is-amazon-project-kuiper. Space-based D2D is evolving from a niche emergency text service to a meaningful two-way service as satellite communications improve. See, e.g., Congressional Research Service, Satellite Direct-to-Cellular (D2C) Service: Emergence, Use Cases, and Considerations for Congress, IF13198 (Apr. 7, 2026), https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13198. 132. Deployment is progressing and the number of unserved or underserved Americans is rapidly diminishing. As of June 2025, there were roughly 23% fewer Americans without access to at least 100/20 Mbps Fixed Terrestrial Service than there were in June 2024 and almost 43% fewer than in June 2023. See Fig. 1. This progress has led to nearly 97% of Americans having access to Fixed Terrestrial Service at a speed of at least 100/20 Mbps as of June 2025. See id. If satellite broadband service were included in the June 2025 statistics, deployment would be virtually universal—with only approximately 25,000 Americans lacking access to at least 100/20 Mbps fixed broadband service (one out of approximately every 14,000 Americans). See id. While satellite service is widely deployed, its usability may be limited by factors as discussed above, Supra note 5. including physical obstructions to the line of sight, capacity constraints in areas with high demand, and network congestion that could result in slower speeds and higher latency in remote areas. See, e.g., Starlink Capacity Analysis v0.2; July 2026 CNET Starlink Surcharge; Starlink Demand Surcharge Webpage. 133. The number of Americans without access to mobile 5G-NR service with speeds of at least 35/3 Mbps also decreased significantly over those periods—nearly 16% between June 2024 and June 2025 and over 30% between June 2023 and June 2025. See Fig. 6. As of June 2025, over 95% of Americans have access to such service. See id. Notably, this impressive progress has included Americans living in rural areas and those living on Tribal lands. See Figs. 1, 2, 6, 7. 134. These statistics demonstrate that broadband is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion, a conclusion supported by multiple commenters. See, e.g., ACA Connects Comments at 3-4; CTIA Comments at 9 (with respect to wireless); Free State Foundation Comments at 2-3; USTelecom Comments at 2-3. We disagree with commenters asserting that the section 706 requirements have not been met. See, e.g., Late Filed Comments of Mile One Broadband Consortium at 72-73 (stating that while “[r]easonable minds can differ on how to approach the questions that Section 1302 poses,” that “[t]he answer is clearly ‘no’ on the question about reasonable and timely deployment considering price differentials between U.S. and European telecommunications markets price index differentials”); Public Knowledge et al. Comments at 4-5. As the Commission has repeatedly stated both here and elsewhere, the statute requires that we determine whether advanced telecommunications capability “is being deployed to all Americans,” not whether it already has. See supra, Section II. That, indeed, is the point of the report’s annual, progression-based cadence. As in past reports, we find that reading section 706(b) to require universal availability as a prerequisite for a positive finding would disregard the statute’s “reasonable and timely” language. See, e.g., 2021 Report, 36 FCC Rcd at 889, para. 106; 2020 Report, 35 FCC Rcd at 9032-33, para. 93. Given the Commission’s strong policymaking efforts to close the digital divide since the 2024 Report, particularly those from the last 16 months, we are confident that our policymaking efforts have encouraged strong progress in deploying advanced telecommunications capability to more Americans than ever before. See supra, Section V; see also, e.g., CTIA Comments at 1-3, 12-13; Free State Foundation Comments at 7-9; ACA Connects Comments at 2. 135. Our work in closing the digital divide, however, is not done. The June 2025 BDC data indicate that roughly 10.5 million people still lack access to fixed terrestrial advanced telecommunications capability at speeds of 100/20 Mbps (if satellite service is not taken into account). See supra, Fig. 1. While deployment continues to improve across all geographic areas, there is still significant work to do to encourage deployment to rural areas, where more than 9 million Americans lack access, and Tribal lands, where roughly 500,000 people still lack access. See supra, id. We note, however, that our finding that advanced telecommunications capabilities deployment is occurring on a reasonable and timely basis does not mean that the Commission may now rest on its laurels and declare the job well done, as some commenters suggest. See, e.g., WTA Comments at 5 (stating that “under a static view from 1996 of what constitutes ‘advanced telecommunications capabilities,’ the Commission could report to Congress that the mission of universal broadband service was accomplished and that nothing more needs to be done.”). On the contrary, even while recognizing that more Americans have access to high-speed Internet than ever before, our work to further encourage the rapid deployment of advanced telecommunications capability will continue at full tilt. We agree with commenters that notwithstanding our positive finding here, we should continue to address barriers to, and promote deployment of, advanced telecommunications services. See, e.g., USTelecom Comments at 7 (recognizing that while “deployment is occurring in a reasonable and timely fashion, and addressing regulatory barriers to additional deployment, the Commission will encourage continued investment in next-generation networks” by preserving the 100/20 Mbps benchmark); NCTA Comments at 10 (providing that “the Commission should recognize the success of these efforts, even as it acknowledges that there is more work still to be done.”). Closing the digital divide will remain a top priority of the Commission as we continue our efforts to deliver its benefits to all Americans. VII. ORDERING CLAUSE 136. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 1302, this Report IS ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary 2 APPENDIX A Supplemental Figures APPX. A-1: Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps by State (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-2: Availability (Millions) of Various Mobile Services, 2023-2025 APPX. A-3: Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps by State (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-4: Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Various Mobile Technologies, 2023-2025 APPX. A-5: Availability of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps by State and County (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-6: Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps on Tribal Lands, 2023-2025 APPX. A-7: Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps on Tribal Lands (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-8: Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps on Tribal Lands (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-9: Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) on Tribal Lands (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-10: Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) on Tribal Lands (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-11: Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) on Tribal Lands (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-12: Share of Population with Access to Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-13: Share of Population with Access to Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-14: Share of Population with Access to Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-15: Share of Population with Access to Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-16: Share of Population with Access to Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-17: Comparison of Demographic Data Between Areas With and Without Fixed Services of 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at least 7/1 Mbps (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-18: Comparison of Demographic Data Between Areas With and Without Fixed Services of 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at least 5/1 Mbps (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-19: Comparison of Demographic Data Between Areas With and Without Fixed Services of 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at least 35/3 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-20: Comparison of Demographic Data Between Areas With and Without Fixed Services of 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at least 7/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-21: Comparison of Demographic Data Between Areas With and Without Fixed Services of 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at least 5/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) (June 30, 2025) APPX. A-1 Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps by State (June 30, 2025) Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Mobile 5G-NR Service Pop. Evaluated Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % United States 343.683 322.795 93.9% 333.102 96.9% 343.658 100.0% 327.140 95.2% Urban Areas 273.611 270.024 98.7% 272.354 99.5% 273.609 100.0% 271.768 99.3% Rural Areas 70.072 52.771 75.3% 60.748 86.7% 70.049 100.0% 55.372 79.0% Alabama 5.158 4.640 90.0% 4.737 91.8% 5.158 100.0% 4.585 88.9% Urban Areas 2.952 2.921 99.0% 2.936 99.5% 2.952 100.0% 2.926 99.1% Rural Areas 2.206 1.719 77.9% 1.801 81.7% 2.206 100.0% 1.659 75.2% Alaska 0.740 0.576 77.8% 0.631 85.2% 0.740 100.0% 0.411 55.5% Urban Areas 0.476 0.462 97.2% 0.472 99.2% 0.476 100.0% 0.304 63.8% Rural Areas 0.264 0.114 42.9% 0.159 60.0% 0.264 100.0% 0.107 40.6% American Samoa 0.044 0.017 37.7% 0.017 37.7% 0.044 100.0% 0.043 97.0% Urban Areas 0.033 0.016 47.5% 0.016 47.5% 0.033 100.0% 0.033 100.0% Rural Areas 0.012 0.001 10.6% 0.001 10.6% 0.012 100.0% 0.010 88.6% Arizona 7.582 6.704 88.4% 7.286 96.1% 7.579 100.0% 7.379 97.3% Urban Areas 6.676 6.352 95.1% 6.649 99.6% 6.676 100.0% 6.656 99.7% Rural Areas 0.906 0.352 38.8% 0.637 70.3% 0.902 99.6% 0.723 79.8% Arkansas 3.088 2.757 89.3% 2.850 92.3% 3.088 100.0% 2.764 89.5% Urban Areas 1.701 1.681 98.8% 1.690 99.3% 1.701 100.0% 1.695 99.7% Rural Areas 1.387 1.076 77.6% 1.161 83.7% 1.387 100.0% 1.069 77.1% California 39.431 37.639 95.5% 38.817 98.4% 39.429 100.0% 38.931 98.7% Urban Areas 37.006 36.510 98.7% 36.831 99.5% 37.006 100.0% 36.843 99.6% Rural Areas 2.425 1.129 46.6% 1.986 81.9% 2.422 99.9% 2.088 86.1% Colorado 5.957 5.489 92.1% 5.803 97.4% 5.957 100.0% 5.751 96.5% Urban Areas 5.080 5.042 99.3% 5.074 99.9% 5.080 100.0% 5.058 99.6% Rural Areas 0.877 0.446 50.9% 0.729 83.1% 0.877 100.0% 0.693 79.0% Connecticut 3.675 3.636 98.9% 3.654 99.4% 3.675 100.0% 3.401 92.6% Urban Areas 3.160 3.127 99.0% 3.144 99.5% 3.160 100.0% 3.023 95.7% Rural Areas 0.515 0.509 98.8% 0.510 99.0% 0.515 100.0% 0.379 73.5% Delaware 1.052 1.030 97.9% 1.037 98.6% 1.052 100.0% 1.020 96.9% Urban Areas 0.861 0.858 99.6% 0.860 99.9% 0.861 100.0% 0.854 99.2% Rural Areas 0.191 0.172 90.1% 0.178 93.0% 0.191 100.0% 0.166 86.9% District of Columbia 0.702 0.701 99.8% 0.702 99.9% 0.702 100.0% 0.702 100.0% Urban Areas 0.702 0.701 99.8% 0.702 99.9% 0.702 100.0% 0.702 100.0% Florida 23.372 22.567 96.6% 22.817 97.6% 23.372 100.0% 22.862 97.8% Urban Areas 21.227 20.984 98.9% 21.079 99.3% 21.227 100.0% 21.097 99.4% Rural Areas 2.145 1.583 73.8% 1.738 81.0% 2.145 100.0% 1.765 82.3% Georgia 11.181 10.751 96.2% 10.827 96.8% 11.181 100.0% 10.287 92.0% Urban Areas 8.216 8.150 99.2% 8.172 99.5% 8.216 100.0% 8.112 98.7% Rural Areas 2.965 2.601 87.7% 2.655 89.5% 2.965 100.0% 2.175 73.4% Guam 0.170 0.103 60.5% 0.167 98.2% 0.170 100.0% 0.163 96.4% Urban Areas 0.146 0.097 66.7% 0.146 99.8% 0.146 100.0% 0.142 97.4% Rural Areas 0.024 0.005 22.2% 0.021 88.5% 0.024 100.0% 0.021 89.9% Hawaii 1.446 1.413 97.7% 1.416 97.9% 1.446 100.0% 1.412 97.6% Urban Areas 1.230 1.217 98.9% 1.219 99.0% 1.230 100.0% 1.223 99.4% Rural Areas 0.216 0.196 91.1% 0.197 91.4% 0.216 99.9% 0.189 87.5% Idaho 2.002 1.591 79.5% 1.894 94.6% 2.002 100.0% 1.918 95.8% Urban Areas 1.345 1.334 99.2% 1.344 99.9% 1.345 100.0% 1.344 99.9% Rural Areas 0.656 0.257 39.1% 0.549 83.6% 0.656 100.0% 0.574 87.5% Illinois 12.710 12.131 95.4% 12.494 98.3% 12.710 100.0% 12.441 97.9% Urban Areas 11.030 10.986 99.6% 11.013 99.8% 11.030 100.0% 11.020 99.9% Rural Areas 1.680 1.145 68.1% 1.481 88.2% 1.680 100.0% 1.421 84.6% Indiana 6.924 6.389 92.3% 6.674 96.4% 6.924 100.0% 6.536 94.4% Urban Areas 4.917 4.872 99.1% 4.900 99.6% 4.917 100.0% 4.906 99.8% Rural Areas 2.007 1.517 75.6% 1.773 88.4% 2.007 100.0% 1.629 81.2% Iowa 3.241 2.995 92.4% 3.155 97.3% 3.240 100.0% 3.033 93.6% Urban Areas 2.040 2.023 99.1% 2.037 99.8% 2.040 100.0% 2.039 99.9% Rural Areas 1.201 0.972 80.9% 1.119 93.2% 1.200 99.9% 0.994 82.8% Kansas 2.971 2.711 91.2% 2.874 96.7% 2.971 100.0% 2.845 95.8% Urban Areas 2.147 2.117 98.6% 2.135 99.5% 2.147 100.0% 2.144 99.9% Rural Areas 0.824 0.594 72.1% 0.739 89.7% 0.824 100.0% 0.701 85.1% Kentucky 4.588 4.186 91.2% 4.260 92.8% 4.588 100.0% 3.938 85.8% Urban Areas 2.690 2.662 98.9% 2.676 99.5% 2.690 100.0% 2.669 99.2% Rural Areas 1.898 1.524 80.3% 1.584 83.4% 1.898 100.0% 1.269 66.8% Louisiana 4.598 4.114 89.5% 4.217 91.7% 4.598 100.0% 4.360 94.8% Urban Areas 3.276 3.195 97.5% 3.232 98.6% 3.276 100.0% 3.270 99.8% Rural Areas 1.321 0.918 69.5% 0.986 74.6% 1.321 100.0% 1.090 82.5% Maine 1.405 1.322 94.1% 1.332 94.8% 1.405 100.0% 1.055 75.1% Urban Areas 0.538 0.532 98.9% 0.535 99.6% 0.538 100.0% 0.516 95.9% Rural Areas 0.867 0.790 91.1% 0.797 91.9% 0.867 100.0% 0.539 62.2% Maryland 6.263 6.161 98.4% 6.191 98.8% 6.262 100.0% 6.100 97.4% Urban Areas 5.323 5.300 99.6% 5.311 99.8% 5.323 100.0% 5.290 99.4% Rural Areas 0.940 0.861 91.6% 0.880 93.6% 0.939 99.9% 0.810 86.2% Massachusetts 7.136 7.108 99.6% 7.116 99.7% 7.136 100.0% 6.873 96.3% Urban Areas 6.501 6.484 99.7% 6.490 99.8% 6.501 100.0% 6.378 98.1% Rural Areas 0.635 0.624 98.3% 0.626 98.6% 0.635 100.0% 0.496 78.1% Michigan 10.140 9.364 92.3% 9.704 95.7% 10.140 100.0% 9.624 94.9% Urban Areas 7.417 7.317 98.6% 7.376 99.4% 7.417 100.0% 7.392 99.7% Rural Areas 2.723 2.048 75.2% 2.327 85.5% 2.722 100.0% 2.232 82.0% Minnesota 5.793 5.429 93.7% 5.627 97.1% 5.793 100.0% 5.550 95.8% Urban Areas 4.132 4.113 99.5% 4.124 99.8% 4.132 100.0% 4.128 99.9% Rural Areas 1.660 1.316 79.2% 1.503 90.5% 1.660 100.0% 1.421 85.6% Mississippi 2.943 2.604 88.5% 2.719 92.4% 2.943 100.0% 2.444 83.1% Urban Areas 1.355 1.343 99.1% 1.351 99.6% 1.355 100.0% 1.346 99.3% Rural Areas 1.588 1.261 79.4% 1.368 86.2% 1.588 100.0% 1.098 69.2% Missouri 6.245 5.480 87.7% 6.002 96.1% 6.245 100.0% 5.746 92.0% Urban Areas 4.290 4.251 99.1% 4.276 99.7% 4.290 100.0% 4.276 99.7% Rural Areas 1.956 1.229 62.8% 1.726 88.2% 1.956 100.0% 1.470 75.2% Montana 1.137 0.877 77.1% 0.995 87.5% 1.137 100.0% 1.038 91.3% Urban Areas 0.591 0.575 97.2% 0.585 98.9% 0.591 100.0% 0.590 99.8% Rural Areas 0.546 0.302 55.3% 0.410 75.1% 0.546 100.0% 0.448 82.1% N. Mariana Isl. 0.051 0.000 0.6% 0.009 17.4% 0.051 100.0% 0.043 84.8% Urban Areas 0.040 0.000 0.6% 0.006 16.4% 0.040 100.0% 0.037 92.3% Rural Areas 0.012 0.000 0.6% 0.002 20.8% 0.012 100.0% 0.007 59.2% Nebraska 2.006 1.833 91.4% 1.947 97.1% 2.006 100.0% 1.862 92.8% Urban Areas 1.466 1.449 98.9% 1.461 99.7% 1.466 100.0% 1.462 99.7% Rural Areas 0.540 0.384 71.1% 0.486 89.9% 0.540 100.0% 0.400 74.1% Nevada 3.267 3.066 93.8% 3.244 99.3% 3.267 100.0% 3.240 99.2% Urban Areas 3.057 2.947 96.4% 3.053 99.9% 3.057 100.0% 3.054 99.9% Rural Areas 0.211 0.118 56.2% 0.190 90.3% 0.211 100.0% 0.186 88.2% New Hampshire 1.409 1.391 98.7% 1.395 99.0% 1.409 100.0% 1.104 78.4% Urban Areas 0.818 0.816 99.8% 0.817 99.9% 0.818 100.0% 0.766 93.7% Rural Areas 0.591 0.575 97.2% 0.578 97.8% 0.591 100.0% 0.338 57.2% New Jersey 9.501 9.452 99.5% 9.467 99.6% 9.501 100.0% 9.370 98.6% Urban Areas 8.897 8.872 99.7% 8.881 99.8% 8.897 100.0% 8.843 99.4% Rural Areas 0.604 0.580 96.0% 0.585 96.9% 0.604 100.0% 0.527 87.2% New Mexico 2.130 1.793 84.2% 1.969 92.4% 2.130 100.0% 2.029 95.3% Urban Areas 1.576 1.532 97.2% 1.569 99.5% 1.576 100.0% 1.574 99.9% Rural Areas 0.554 0.262 47.3% 0.400 72.2% 0.554 100.0% 0.455 82.2% New York 19.867 19.463 98.0% 19.639 98.9% 19.867 100.0% 19.102 96.2% Urban Areas 17.307 17.096 98.8% 17.237 99.6% 17.307 100.0% 17.137 99.0% Rural Areas 2.560 2.367 92.5% 2.402 93.8% 2.560 100.0% 1.966 76.8% North Carolina 11.046 10.436 94.5% 10.563 95.6% 11.046 100.0% 9.993 90.5% Urban Areas 7.364 7.284 98.9% 7.329 99.5% 7.364 100.0% 7.266 98.7% Rural Areas 3.682 3.152 85.6% 3.234 87.8% 3.682 100.0% 2.726 74.0% North Dakota 0.797 0.789 99.1% 0.796 100.0% 0.797 100.0% 0.750 94.2% Urban Areas 0.482 0.481 99.9% 0.482 100.0% 0.482 100.0% 0.481 99.7% Rural Areas 0.315 0.308 97.9% 0.314 99.9% 0.315 100.0% 0.270 85.7% Ohio 11.883 11.126 93.6% 11.518 96.9% 11.883 100.0% 11.593 97.6% Urban Areas 9.050 8.968 99.1% 9.019 99.7% 9.050 100.0% 9.044 99.9% Rural Areas 2.834 2.159 76.2% 2.500 88.2% 2.833 100.0% 2.550 90.0% Oklahoma 4.095 3.553 86.7% 3.923 95.8% 4.095 100.0% 3.913 95.5% Urban Areas 2.622 2.553 97.4% 2.602 99.2% 2.622 100.0% 2.620 100.0% Rural Areas 1.474 1.000 67.8% 1.321 89.7% 1.474 100.0% 1.293 87.7% Oregon 4.272 3.963 92.7% 4.074 95.4% 4.272 100.0% 4.083 95.6% Urban Areas 3.411 3.389 99.4% 3.401 99.7% 3.411 100.0% 3.401 99.7% Rural Areas 0.861 0.573 66.6% 0.673 78.2% 0.861 100.0% 0.682 79.2% Pennsylvania 13.079 12.562 96.1% 12.731 97.3% 13.069 99.9% 12.564 96.1% Urban Areas 9.976 9.934 99.6% 9.947 99.7% 9.975 100.0% 9.942 99.7% Rural Areas 3.102 2.628 84.7% 2.784 89.7% 3.094 99.7% 2.622 84.5% Puerto Rico 3.203 2.914 91.0% 3.170 99.0% 3.203 100.0% 3.111 97.1% Urban Areas 2.941 2.739 93.1% 2.928 99.6% 2.941 100.0% 2.901 98.6% Rural Areas 0.262 0.175 66.9% 0.242 92.4% 0.262 100.0% 0.209 79.9% Rhode Island 1.112 1.095 98.5% 1.102 99.1% 1.112 100.0% 1.078 97.0% Urban Areas 1.011 0.999 98.8% 1.005 99.4% 1.011 100.0% 0.999 98.8% Rural Areas 0.101 0.096 94.7% 0.097 96.0% 0.101 100.0% 0.080 79.0% South Carolina 5.479 5.307 96.9% 5.353 97.7% 5.479 100.0% 5.149 94.0% Urban Areas 3.687 3.642 98.8% 3.660 99.3% 3.687 100.0% 3.676 99.7% Rural Areas 1.792 1.665 92.9% 1.693 94.5% 1.792 100.0% 1.473 82.2% South Dakota 0.925 0.879 95.1% 0.892 96.4% 0.925 100.0% 0.863 93.3% Urban Areas 0.517 0.515 99.6% 0.515 99.8% 0.517 100.0% 0.516 99.9% Rural Areas 0.408 0.364 89.3% 0.376 92.2% 0.408 100.0% 0.347 85.1% Tennessee 7.228 7.017 97.1% 7.063 97.7% 7.228 100.0% 6.391 88.4% Urban Areas 4.740 4.713 99.4% 4.730 99.8% 4.740 100.0% 4.687 98.9% Rural Areas 2.488 2.303 92.6% 2.334 93.8% 2.488 100.0% 1.703 68.5% Texas 31.291 28.937 92.5% 30.582 97.7% 31.290 100.0% 30.789 98.4% Urban Areas 25.873 25.428 98.3% 25.732 99.5% 25.873 100.0% 25.860 100.0% Rural Areas 5.418 3.509 64.8% 4.850 89.5% 5.418 100.0% 4.929 91.0% U.S. Virgin Isl. 0.104 0.104 99.3% 0.104 99.8% 0.104 100.0% 0.059 56.9% Urban Areas 0.098 0.098 100.0% 0.098 100.0% 0.098 100.0% 0.057 58.6% Rural Areas 0.007 0.006 90.0% 0.006 96.9% 0.007 100.0% 0.002 31.0% Utah 3.504 3.324 94.9% 3.445 98.3% 3.504 100.0% 3.457 98.7% Urban Areas 3.070 3.034 98.8% 3.066 99.9% 3.070 100.0% 3.069 100.0% Rural Areas 0.433 0.289 66.8% 0.379 87.5% 0.433 100.0% 0.387 89.4% Vermont 0.648 0.568 87.6% 0.576 88.7% 0.648 100.0% 0.374 57.7% Urban Areas 0.226 0.226 99.6% 0.226 99.7% 0.226 100.0% 0.200 88.2% Rural Areas 0.422 0.343 81.2% 0.350 82.9% 0.422 100.0% 0.175 41.4% Virginia 8.811 8.114 92.1% 8.296 94.2% 8.810 100.0% 7.971 90.5% Urban Areas 6.615 6.507 98.4% 6.563 99.2% 6.615 100.0% 6.550 99.0% Rural Areas 2.197 1.608 73.2% 1.733 78.9% 2.196 100.0% 1.421 64.7% Washington 7.958 7.285 91.5% 7.503 94.3% 7.958 100.0% 7.661 96.3% Urban Areas 6.580 6.514 99.0% 6.541 99.4% 6.580 100.0% 6.544 99.5% Rural Areas 1.378 0.771 55.9% 0.962 69.8% 1.377 100.0% 1.116 81.0% West Virginia 1.770 1.482 83.7% 1.509 85.3% 1.769 99.9% 1.381 78.0% Urban Areas 0.792 0.787 99.3% 0.789 99.6% 0.792 100.0% 0.779 98.4% Rural Areas 0.978 0.695 71.1% 0.720 73.7% 0.976 99.9% 0.602 61.5% Wisconsin 5.961 5.396 90.5% 5.675 95.2% 5.961 100.0% 5.463 91.6% Urban Areas 3.976 3.925 98.7% 3.965 99.7% 3.976 100.0% 3.969 99.8% Rural Areas 1.985 1.471 74.1% 1.710 86.1% 1.985 100.0% 1.494 75.3% Wyoming 0.588 0.463 78.9% 0.543 92.3% 0.588 100.0% 0.533 90.6% Urban Areas 0.358 0.354 98.8% 0.358 100.0% 0.358 100.0% 0.357 99.6% Rural Areas 0.229 0.109 47.7% 0.184 80.4% 0.229 100.0% 0.176 76.6% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. APPX. A-2 Availability (Millions) of Various Mobile Services, 2023-2025 June 2023 Dec. 2023 June 2024 Dec. 2024 June 2025 Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps (outdoor stationary environment) United States 314.760 93.0% 317.352 93.8% 324.065 94.3% 325.447 94.7% 327.140 95.2% Urban Areas 266.218 98.7% 266.673 98.9% 271.111 99.1% 271.393 99.2% 271.768 99.3% Rural Areas 48.541 70.5% 50.680 73.6% 52.954 75.6% 54.053 77.1% 55.372 79.0% Tribal Lands 3.241 78.9% 3.333 81.1% 3.488 83.8% 3.519 84.6% 3.562 85.6% Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps (in-vehicle mobile environment) United States 261.646 77.3% 271.054 80.1% 284.111 82.7% 289.307 84.2% 293.829 85.5% Urban Areas 234.874 87.1% 241.237 89.5% 250.295 91.5% 253.976 92.8% 256.871 93.9% Rural Areas 26.772 38.9% 29.818 43.3% 33.816 48.3% 35.330 50.4% 36.958 52.7% Tribal Lands 2.258 55.0% 2.494 60.7% 2.835 68.2% 2.909 69.9% 2.974 71.5% Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps (outdoor stationary environment) United States 328.349 97.0% 329.689 97.4% 334.532 97.3% 335.384 97.6% 336.452 97.9% Urban Areas 268.939 99.8% 269.123 99.8% 273.135 99.8% 273.265 99.9% 273.386 99.9% Rural Areas 59.411 86.2% 60.567 87.9% 61.398 87.6% 62.119 88.6% 63.066 90.0% Tribal Lands 3.642 88.7% 3.670 89.3% 3.752 90.2% 3.786 91.0% 3.820 91.8% Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps (in-vehicle mobile environment) United States 295.924 87.4% 301.026 88.9% 309.653 90.1% 312.468 90.9% 316.755 92.2% Urban Areas 257.899 95.7% 260.741 96.7% 266.161 97.3% 267.570 97.8% 269.576 98.5% Rural Areas 38.026 55.2% 40.285 58.5% 43.492 62.1% 44.898 64.1% 47.179 67.3% Tribal Lands 2.935 71.4% 3.092 75.3% 3.276 78.8% 3.343 80.4% 3.408 81.9% Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps (outdoor stationary environment) United States 336.939 99.5% 337.037 99.6% 342.178 99.6% 342.385 99.6% 342.530 99.7% Urban Areas 269.311 99.9% 269.306 99.9% 273.309 99.9% 273.500 100.0% 273.587 100.0% Rural Areas 67.627 98.2% 67.731 98.3% 68.869 98.3% 68.885 98.3% 68.943 98.4% Tribal Lands 4.039 98.3% 4.042 98.4% 4.094 98.4% 4.100 98.6% 4.113 98.9% Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps (in-vehicle mobile environment) United States 324.565 95.9% 325.792 96.2% 331.307 96.4% 331.605 96.5% 331.757 96.5% Urban Areas 267.617 99.3% 267.711 99.3% 271.879 99.4% 272.174 99.5% 272.233 99.5% Rural Areas 56.948 82.7% 58.081 84.3% 59.429 84.8% 59.431 84.8% 59.524 84.9% Tribal Lands 3.800 92.5% 3.842 93.5% 3.906 93.9% 3.906 93.9% 3.928 94.4% Pop. Evaluated 338.489 100.0% 338.489 100.0% 343.683 100.0% 343.683 100.0% 343.683 100.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BDC, Dec. 2024; FCC BDC, June 2024; FCC BDC, Dec. 2023; FCC BDC, June 2023; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. APPX. A-3 Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps by State (June 30, 2025) Mobile 5G-NR of at Least 35/3 Mbps and Any Fixed Services Fixed Terrestrial Services Fixed Wireline Services Pop. Evaluated Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % United States 343.683 327.125 95.2% 320.282 93.2% 311.014 90.5% Urban Areas 273.611 271.766 99.3% 270.537 98.9% 268.222 98.0% Rural Areas 70.072 55.359 79.0% 49.745 71.0% 42.792 61.1% Alabama 5.158 4.585 88.9% 4.341 84.2% 4.253 82.5% Urban Areas 2.952 2.926 99.1% 2.911 98.6% 2.896 98.1% Rural Areas 2.206 1.659 75.2% 1.430 64.8% 1.357 61.5% Alaska 0.740 0.411 55.5% 0.383 51.8% 0.356 48.1% Urban Areas 0.476 0.304 63.8% 0.302 63.4% 0.296 62.3% Rural Areas 0.264 0.107 40.6% 0.082 30.8% 0.060 22.5% American Samoa 0.044 0.043 97.0% 0.017 37.5% 0.017 37.5% Urban Areas 0.033 0.033 100.0% 0.016 47.5% 0.016 47.5% Rural Areas 0.012 0.010 88.6% 0.001 9.7% 0.001 9.7% Arizona 7.582 7.379 97.3% 7.207 95.1% 6.661 87.8% Urban Areas 6.676 6.656 99.7% 6.630 99.3% 6.333 94.9% Rural Areas 0.906 0.723 79.8% 0.577 63.7% 0.328 36.2% Arkansas 3.088 2.764 89.5% 2.615 84.7% 2.528 81.9% Urban Areas 1.701 1.695 99.7% 1.684 99.0% 1.675 98.5% Rural Areas 1.387 1.069 77.1% 0.931 67.1% 0.853 61.5% California 39.431 38.930 98.7% 38.456 97.5% 37.362 94.8% Urban Areas 37.006 36.843 99.6% 36.669 99.1% 36.350 98.2% Rural Areas 2.425 2.087 86.1% 1.787 73.7% 1.012 41.7% Colorado 5.957 5.751 96.5% 5.672 95.2% 5.411 90.8% Urban Areas 5.080 5.058 99.6% 5.051 99.4% 5.020 98.8% Rural Areas 0.877 0.693 79.0% 0.621 70.8% 0.391 44.5% Connecticut 3.675 3.401 92.6% 3.382 92.0% 3.364 91.5% Urban Areas 3.160 3.023 95.7% 3.008 95.2% 2.990 94.6% Rural Areas 0.515 0.379 73.5% 0.374 72.7% 0.373 72.5% Delaware 1.052 1.020 96.9% 1.008 95.9% 1.001 95.2% Urban Areas 0.861 0.854 99.2% 0.853 99.1% 0.851 98.8% Rural Areas 0.191 0.166 86.9% 0.156 81.5% 0.150 78.5% District of Columbia 0.702 0.702 100.0% 0.702 99.9% 0.701 99.8% Urban Areas 0.702 0.702 100.0% 0.702 99.9% 0.701 99.8% Florida 23.372 22.862 97.8% 22.425 95.9% 22.191 94.9% Urban Areas 21.227 21.097 99.4% 20.952 98.7% 20.857 98.3% Rural Areas 2.145 1.765 82.3% 1.473 68.7% 1.334 62.2% Georgia 11.181 10.287 92.0% 10.060 90.0% 9.986 89.3% Urban Areas 8.216 8.112 98.7% 8.070 98.2% 8.048 97.9% Rural Areas 2.965 2.175 73.3% 1.990 67.1% 1.938 65.4% Guam 0.170 0.163 96.4% 0.161 94.9% 0.100 58.7% Urban Areas 0.146 0.142 97.4% 0.142 97.3% 0.095 64.8% Rural Areas 0.024 0.021 89.9% 0.019 79.9% 0.005 21.1% Hawaii 1.446 1.411 97.6% 1.386 95.9% 1.384 95.7% Urban Areas 1.230 1.223 99.4% 1.211 98.4% 1.209 98.3% Rural Areas 0.216 0.189 87.4% 0.175 81.3% 0.175 81.0% Idaho 2.002 1.918 95.8% 1.850 92.4% 1.577 78.8% Urban Areas 1.345 1.344 99.9% 1.343 99.8% 1.333 99.1% Rural Areas 0.656 0.574 87.5% 0.507 77.2% 0.244 37.2% Illinois 12.710 12.441 97.9% 12.291 96.7% 11.984 94.3% Urban Areas 11.030 11.020 99.9% 11.002 99.7% 10.976 99.5% Rural Areas 1.680 1.421 84.6% 1.289 76.7% 1.008 60.0% Indiana 6.924 6.535 94.4% 6.366 91.9% 6.115 88.3% Urban Areas 4.917 4.906 99.8% 4.889 99.4% 4.861 98.9% Rural Areas 2.007 1.629 81.2% 1.477 73.6% 1.254 62.5% Iowa 3.241 3.032 93.5% 2.979 91.9% 2.844 87.7% Urban Areas 2.040 2.038 99.9% 2.035 99.7% 2.021 99.1% Rural Areas 1.201 0.993 82.7% 0.944 78.6% 0.823 68.5% Kansas 2.971 2.845 95.8% 2.781 93.6% 2.638 88.8% Urban Areas 2.147 2.144 99.9% 2.132 99.3% 2.114 98.5% Rural Areas 0.824 0.701 85.1% 0.649 78.8% 0.525 63.7% Kentucky 4.588 3.938 85.8% 3.758 81.9% 3.691 80.4% Urban Areas 2.690 2.669 99.2% 2.655 98.7% 2.641 98.2% Rural Areas 1.898 1.269 66.8% 1.102 58.1% 1.050 55.3% Louisiana 4.598 4.360 94.8% 4.102 89.2% 4.005 87.1% Urban Areas 3.276 3.270 99.8% 3.226 98.5% 3.189 97.4% Rural Areas 1.321 1.090 82.5% 0.877 66.3% 0.816 61.7% Maine 1.405 1.055 75.1% 1.023 72.8% 1.013 72.1% Urban Areas 0.538 0.516 95.9% 0.513 95.4% 0.509 94.7% Rural Areas 0.867 0.539 62.2% 0.510 58.7% 0.503 58.0% Maryland 6.263 6.099 97.4% 6.042 96.5% 6.013 96.0% Urban Areas 5.323 5.290 99.4% 5.278 99.2% 5.267 98.9% Rural Areas 0.940 0.809 86.1% 0.764 81.3% 0.746 79.4% Massachusetts 7.136 6.873 96.3% 6.857 96.1% 6.850 96.0% Urban Areas 6.501 6.378 98.1% 6.367 97.9% 6.361 97.8% Rural Areas 0.635 0.496 78.1% 0.491 77.3% 0.489 77.0% Michigan 10.140 9.624 94.9% 9.323 91.9% 9.017 88.9% Urban Areas 7.417 7.392 99.7% 7.352 99.1% 7.292 98.3% Rural Areas 2.723 2.232 82.0% 1.971 72.4% 1.724 63.3% Minnesota 5.793 5.550 95.8% 5.430 93.7% 5.255 90.7% Urban Areas 4.132 4.128 99.9% 4.120 99.7% 4.109 99.4% Rural Areas 1.660 1.421 85.6% 1.310 78.9% 1.147 69.1% Mississippi 2.943 2.444 83.1% 2.315 78.7% 2.229 75.7% Urban Areas 1.355 1.346 99.3% 1.341 99.0% 1.334 98.4% Rural Areas 1.588 1.098 69.2% 0.973 61.3% 0.895 56.4% Missouri 6.245 5.746 92.0% 5.609 89.8% 5.232 83.8% Urban Areas 4.290 4.276 99.7% 4.263 99.4% 4.238 98.8% Rural Areas 1.956 1.470 75.2% 1.346 68.8% 0.994 50.8% Montana 1.137 1.038 91.3% 0.945 83.1% 0.836 73.5% Urban Areas 0.591 0.590 99.8% 0.583 98.7% 0.573 97.0% Rural Areas 0.546 0.448 82.1% 0.361 66.2% 0.263 48.1% N. Mariana Isl. 0.051 0.043 84.8% 0.007 13.9% 0.000 0.4% Urban Areas 0.040 0.037 92.3% 0.006 15.8% 0.000 0.4% Rural Areas 0.012 0.007 59.2% 0.001 7.7% 0.000 0.4% Nebraska 2.006 1.862 92.8% 1.830 91.2% 1.738 86.6% Urban Areas 1.466 1.462 99.7% 1.458 99.5% 1.446 98.6% Rural Areas 0.540 0.400 74.1% 0.372 68.9% 0.292 54.1% Nevada 3.267 3.240 99.2% 3.224 98.7% 3.059 93.6% Urban Areas 3.057 3.054 99.9% 3.051 99.8% 2.945 96.4% Rural Areas 0.211 0.186 88.2% 0.174 82.3% 0.114 54.1% New Hampshire 1.409 1.104 78.4% 1.098 77.9% 1.096 77.8% Urban Areas 0.818 0.766 93.7% 0.766 93.6% 0.765 93.6% Rural Areas 0.591 0.338 57.2% 0.333 56.3% 0.330 55.9% New Jersey 9.501 9.370 98.6% 9.343 98.3% 9.328 98.2% Urban Areas 8.897 8.843 99.4% 8.828 99.2% 8.819 99.1% Rural Areas 0.604 0.527 87.2% 0.515 85.2% 0.509 84.3% New Mexico 2.130 2.029 95.3% 1.916 90.0% 1.760 82.6% Urban Areas 1.576 1.574 99.9% 1.567 99.4% 1.530 97.0% Rural Areas 0.554 0.455 82.2% 0.350 63.1% 0.231 41.7% New York 19.867 19.102 96.2% 18.937 95.3% 18.764 94.4% Urban Areas 17.307 17.137 99.0% 17.068 98.6% 16.928 97.8% Rural Areas 2.560 1.966 76.8% 1.869 73.0% 1.836 71.7% North Carolina 11.046 9.993 90.5% 9.716 88.0% 9.594 86.9% Urban Areas 7.364 7.266 98.7% 7.233 98.2% 7.188 97.6% Rural Areas 3.682 2.726 74.0% 2.483 67.4% 2.406 65.3% North Dakota 0.797 0.750 94.2% 0.750 94.2% 0.744 93.4% Urban Areas 0.482 0.481 99.7% 0.481 99.7% 0.480 99.6% Rural Areas 0.315 0.270 85.7% 0.269 85.6% 0.264 83.8% Ohio 11.883 11.593 97.6% 11.328 95.3% 10.960 92.2% Urban Areas 9.050 9.044 99.9% 9.013 99.6% 8.962 99.0% Rural Areas 2.834 2.549 90.0% 2.315 81.7% 1.998 70.5% Oklahoma 4.095 3.913 95.5% 3.788 92.5% 3.451 84.3% Urban Areas 2.622 2.620 100.0% 2.601 99.2% 2.552 97.3% Rural Areas 1.474 1.293 87.7% 1.188 80.6% 0.899 61.0% Oregon 4.272 4.083 95.6% 3.957 92.6% 3.854 90.2% Urban Areas 3.411 3.401 99.7% 3.391 99.4% 3.379 99.1% Rural Areas 0.861 0.682 79.2% 0.566 65.8% 0.475 55.2% Pennsylvania 13.079 12.556 96.0% 12.337 94.3% 12.184 93.2% Urban Areas 9.976 9.941 99.7% 9.914 99.4% 9.901 99.2% Rural Areas 3.102 2.615 84.3% 2.423 78.1% 2.283 73.6% Puerto Rico 3.203 3.111 97.1% 3.087 96.4% 2.851 89.0% Urban Areas 2.941 2.901 98.6% 2.890 98.2% 2.704 91.9% Rural Areas 0.262 0.209 79.9% 0.198 75.4% 0.148 56.3% Rhode Island 1.112 1.078 97.0% 1.069 96.1% 1.063 95.5% Urban Areas 1.011 0.999 98.8% 0.992 98.1% 0.987 97.6% Rural Areas 0.101 0.080 79.0% 0.077 76.2% 0.076 75.0% South Carolina 5.479 5.149 94.0% 5.048 92.1% 5.002 91.3% Urban Areas 3.687 3.676 99.7% 3.649 99.0% 3.631 98.5% Rural Areas 1.792 1.473 82.2% 1.399 78.1% 1.371 76.5% South Dakota 0.925 0.863 93.3% 0.842 91.1% 0.831 89.9% Urban Areas 0.517 0.516 99.9% 0.515 99.6% 0.514 99.5% Rural Areas 0.408 0.347 85.1% 0.327 80.2% 0.317 77.8% Tennessee 7.228 6.391 88.4% 6.303 87.2% 6.258 86.6% Urban Areas 4.740 4.687 98.9% 4.677 98.7% 4.661 98.3% Rural Areas 2.488 1.703 68.5% 1.626 65.3% 1.597 64.2% Texas 31.291 30.789 98.4% 30.232 96.6% 28.688 91.7% Urban Areas 25.873 25.860 100.0% 25.720 99.4% 25.416 98.2% Rural Areas 5.418 4.929 91.0% 4.513 83.3% 3.272 60.4% U.S. Virgin Isl. 0.104 0.059 56.9% 0.059 56.8% 0.059 56.6% Urban Areas 0.098 0.057 58.6% 0.057 58.6% 0.057 58.6% Rural Areas 0.007 0.002 31.0% 0.002 29.7% 0.002 26.5% Utah 3.504 3.457 98.7% 3.425 97.7% 3.308 94.4% Urban Areas 3.070 3.069 100.0% 3.065 99.8% 3.034 98.8% Rural Areas 0.433 0.387 89.4% 0.360 83.0% 0.275 63.4% Vermont 0.648 0.374 57.7% 0.357 55.1% 0.352 54.3% Urban Areas 0.226 0.200 88.2% 0.199 88.0% 0.199 88.0% Rural Areas 0.422 0.175 41.4% 0.158 37.4% 0.153 36.3% Virginia 8.811 7.970 90.5% 7.682 87.2% 7.516 85.3% Urban Areas 6.615 6.550 99.0% 6.500 98.3% 6.444 97.4% Rural Areas 2.197 1.420 64.6% 1.182 53.8% 1.072 48.8% Washington 7.958 7.661 96.3% 7.352 92.4% 7.147 89.8% Urban Areas 6.580 6.544 99.5% 6.507 98.9% 6.481 98.5% Rural Areas 1.378 1.116 81.0% 0.845 61.3% 0.667 48.4% West Virginia 1.770 1.381 78.0% 1.276 72.1% 1.251 70.7% Urban Areas 0.792 0.779 98.4% 0.776 98.0% 0.774 97.7% Rural Areas 0.978 0.602 61.5% 0.500 51.1% 0.477 48.8% Wisconsin 5.961 5.463 91.6% 5.321 89.3% 5.091 85.4% Urban Areas 3.976 3.969 99.8% 3.958 99.5% 3.918 98.6% Rural Areas 1.985 1.494 75.3% 1.363 68.6% 1.173 59.1% Wyoming 0.588 0.533 90.6% 0.510 86.7% 0.450 76.6% Urban Areas 0.358 0.357 99.6% 0.357 99.6% 0.353 98.4% Rural Areas 0.229 0.176 76.6% 0.153 66.7% 0.098 42.6% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. APPX. A-4 Availability (Millions) of Fixed and Mobile Services at Different Speed Tiers, 2023-2025 June 2023 Dec. 2023 June 2024 Dec. 2024 June 2025 Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Fixed Wireline Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service of at least 35/3 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) United States 251.389 74.3% 260.917 77.1% 273.155 79.5% 278.280 81.0% 282.943 82.3% Urban Areas 231.475 85.9% 238.154 88.3% 247.129 90.3% 250.577 91.6% 253.571 92.7% Rural Areas 19.914 28.9% 22.763 33.0% 26.026 37.1% 27.703 39.5% 29.372 41.9% Tribal Lands 1.921 46.8% 2.128 51.8% 2.405 57.8% 2.458 59.1% 2.519 60.5% Fixed Terrestrial Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service of at least 35/3 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) United States 255.830 75.6% 265.697 78.5% 279.270 81.3% 284.913 82.9% 289.884 84.3% Urban Areas 233.083 86.5% 239.672 88.9% 248.911 91.0% 252.675 92.4% 255.761 93.5% Rural Areas 22.747 33.0% 26.024 37.8% 30.359 43.3% 32.237 46.0% 34.123 48.7% Tribal Lands 2.056 50.0% 2.325 56.6% 2.658 63.9% 2.755 66.2% 2.831 68.0% Any Fixed Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service of at least 35/3 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) United States 261.605 77.3% 271.022 80.1% 284.098 82.7% 289.299 84.2% 293.821 85.5% Urban Areas 234.849 87.1% 241.220 89.5% 250.293 91.5% 253.975 92.8% 256.870 93.9% Rural Areas 26.756 38.8% 29.803 43.3% 33.805 48.2% 35.324 50.4% 36.951 52.7% Tribal Lands 2.258 55.0% 2.494 60.7% 2.835 68.2% 2.909 69.9% 2.974 71.5% Fixed Wireline Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service of at least 7/1 Mbps (Outdoor Stationary) United States 306.007 90.4% 308.697 91.2% 314.376 91.5% 316.190 92.0% 318.112 92.6% Urban Areas 264.892 98.3% 265.428 98.5% 269.553 98.5% 269.528 98.5% 269.806 98.6% Rural Areas 41.115 59.7% 43.269 62.8% 44.823 64.0% 46.662 66.6% 48.306 68.9% Tribal Lands 2.761 67.2% 2.851 69.4% 2.933 70.5% 2.967 71.3% 3.009 72.3% Fixed Terrestrial Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service of at least 7/1 Mbps (Outdoor Stationary) United States 313.755 92.7% 316.924 93.6% 323.784 94.2% 325.909 94.8% 328.007 95.4% Urban Areas 266.718 98.9% 267.209 99.1% 271.525 99.2% 271.787 99.3% 272.134 99.5% Rural Areas 47.037 68.3% 49.715 72.2% 52.259 74.6% 54.122 77.2% 55.873 79.7% Tribal Lands 3.076 74.9% 3.227 78.5% 3.361 80.8% 3.447 82.9% 3.502 84.2% Any Fixed Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service of at least 7/1 Mbps (Outdoor Stationary) United States 328.283 97.0% 329.635 97.4% 334.504 97.3% 335.369 97.6% 336.432 97.9% Urban Areas 268.911 99.7% 269.104 99.8% 273.131 99.8% 273.263 99.9% 273.384 99.9% Rural Areas 59.373 86.2% 60.531 87.9% 61.373 87.6% 62.105 88.6% 63.047 90.0% Tribal Lands 3.641 88.6% 3.669 89.3% 3.751 90.2% 3.786 91.0% 3.816 91.7% Fixed Wireline Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service of at least 7/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) United States 281.733 83.2% 287.330 84.9% 295.578 86.0% 298.579 86.9% 303.072 88.2% Urban Areas 254.119 94.3% 257.242 95.4% 262.739 96.0% 263.949 96.5% 266.072 97.2% Rural Areas 27.614 40.1% 30.088 43.7% 32.839 46.9% 34.630 49.4% 37.000 52.8% Tribal Lands 2.383 58.0% 2.532 61.6% 2.682 64.5% 2.734 65.7% 2.796 67.2% Fixed Terrestrial Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service of at least 7/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) United States 287.513 84.9% 293.552 86.7% 303.126 88.2% 306.611 89.2% 311.423 90.6% Urban Areas 255.864 94.9% 258.956 96.1% 264.651 96.7% 266.168 97.3% 268.372 98.1% Rural Areas 31.649 45.9% 34.596 50.2% 38.475 54.9% 40.443 57.7% 43.051 61.4% Tribal Lands 2.602 63.3% 2.822 68.7% 3.024 72.7% 3.121 75.0% 3.201 76.9% Any Fixed Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service of at least 7/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) United States 295.876 87.4% 300.988 88.9% 309.636 90.1% 312.459 90.9% 316.744 92.2% Urban Areas 257.872 95.7% 260.722 96.7% 266.158 97.3% 267.569 97.8% 269.574 98.5% Rural Areas 38.004 55.2% 40.266 58.5% 43.478 62.0% 44.890 64.1% 47.170 67.3% Tribal Lands 2.934 71.4% 3.092 75.2% 3.276 78.8% 3.343 80.4% 3.408 81.9% Fixed Wireline Service and Mobile 4G LTE of at least 5/1 Mbps (Outdoor Stationary) United States 310.821 91.8% 312.933 92.4% 319.076 92.8% 320.739 93.3% 322.154 93.7% Urban Areas 265.231 98.4% 265.582 98.5% 269.697 98.6% 269.750 98.6% 270.002 98.7% Rural Areas 45.589 66.2% 47.352 68.7% 49.379 70.5% 50.989 72.8% 52.153 74.4% Tribal Lands 2.897 70.5% 2.970 72.3% 3.042 73.1% 3.060 73.6% 3.094 74.4% Fixed Terrestrial Service and Mobile 4G LTE of at least 5/1 Mbps (Outdoor Stationary) United States 319.149 94.3% 321.737 95.1% 328.989 95.7% 330.862 96.3% 332.414 96.7% Urban Areas 267.068 99.1% 267.371 99.2% 271.678 99.3% 272.011 99.4% 272.331 99.5% Rural Areas 52.081 75.6% 54.366 78.9% 57.311 81.8% 58.851 84.0% 60.083 85.7% Tribal Lands 3.248 79.1% 3.383 82.3% 3.507 84.3% 3.586 86.2% 3.632 87.3% Any Fixed Service and Mobile 4G LTE of at least 5/1 Mbps (Outdoor Stationary) United States 336.851 99.5% 336.967 99.6% 342.139 99.6% 342.366 99.6% 342.507 99.7% Urban Areas 269.281 99.9% 269.286 99.9% 273.305 99.9% 273.498 100.0% 273.585 100.0% Rural Areas 67.570 98.1% 67.681 98.2% 68.834 98.2% 68.868 98.3% 68.922 98.4% Tribal Lands 4.036 98.2% 4.038 98.3% 4.090 98.3% 4.099 98.5% 4.109 98.8% Fixed Wireline Service and Mobile 4G LTE of at least 5/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) United States 303.075 89.5% 305.587 90.3% 311.730 90.7% 313.243 91.1% 314.372 91.5% Urban Areas 263.575 97.8% 264.029 97.9% 268.298 98.1% 268.457 98.1% 268.670 98.2% Rural Areas 39.500 57.3% 41.558 60.3% 43.432 62.0% 44.786 63.9% 45.702 65.2% Tribal Lands 2.793 68.0% 2.881 70.1% 2.955 71.0% 2.977 71.6% 3.007 72.3% Fixed Terrestrial Service and Mobile 4G LTE of at least 5/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) United States 310.698 91.8% 313.703 92.7% 320.986 93.4% 322.741 93.9% 324.018 94.3% Urban Areas 265.406 98.4% 265.805 98.6% 270.273 98.8% 270.712 98.9% 270.992 99.0% Rural Areas 45.292 65.7% 47.897 69.5% 50.714 72.4% 52.030 74.2% 53.026 75.7% Tribal Lands 3.115 75.8% 3.269 79.6% 3.397 81.7% 3.472 83.5% 3.518 84.5% Any Fixed Service and Mobile 4G LTE of at least 5/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) United States 324.492 95.9% 325.736 96.2% 331.282 96.4% 331.592 96.5% 331.742 96.5% Urban Areas 267.587 99.3% 267.691 99.3% 271.875 99.4% 272.173 99.5% 272.231 99.5% Rural Areas 56.905 82.6% 58.045 84.3% 59.407 84.8% 59.419 84.8% 59.511 84.9% Tribal Lands 3.799 92.5% 3.841 93.5% 3.906 93.9% 3.905 93.9% 3.928 94.4% Pop. Evaluated 338.489 100.0% 338.489 100.0% 343.683 100.0% 343.683 100.0% 343.683 100.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BDC, Dec. 2024; FCC BDC, June 2024; FCC BDC, Dec. 2023; FCC BDC, June 2023; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. APPX. A-5 Availability of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps by State and County (June 30, 2025) State, Territory, County, or County Equivalent Pop. Evaluated Fixed Terrestrial Service Fixed Wireline Service Mobile 5G-NR Service Pop. Density Per Capita Income Alabama 5,157,698 91.8% 90.0% 88.9% 101.8 $34,835 Autauga County 61,464 96.8% 96.6% 93.1% 103.4 $36,227 Baldwin County 261,608 84.4% 80.1% 93.9% 164.6 $40,775 Barbour County 24,358 93.7% 92.6% 75.7% 27.5 $25,439 Bibb County 22,258 41.3% 36.4% 51.8% 35.8 $26,022 Blount County 60,163 72.2% 65.8% 78.9% 93.3 $30,656 Bullock County 9,901 99.2% 99.2% 52.8% 15.9 $21,462 Butler County 18,256 70.2% 67.3% 68.6% 23.5 $28,306 Calhoun County 116,427 93.3% 92.7% 93.4% 192.2 $29,571 Chambers County 33,813 93.6% 93.3% 81.6% 56.7 $27,868 Cherokee County 26,138 52.1% 45.0% 61.0% 47.2 $31,360 Chilton County 47,262 79.8% 77.6% 68.1% 68.2 $30,032 Choctaw County 12,052 48.4% 47.3% 52.7% 13.2 $26,781 Clarke County 22,142 44.5% 38.3% 67.8% 17.9 $31,101 Clay County 14,239 70.1% 68.0% 51.1% 23.6 $29,268 Cleburne County 15,905 53.9% 19.5% 52.4% 28.4 $29,569 Coffee County 56,358 98.7% 98.3% 74.0% 83.0 $32,757 Colbert County 58,785 95.4% 94.4% 88.9% 99.1 $32,685 Conecuh County 11,109 46.3% 28.1% 54.6% 13.1 $26,323 Coosa County 10,291 81.2% 78.0% 52.6% 15.8 $29,035 Covington County 37,748 95.1% 94.1% 70.0% 36.6 $30,151 Crenshaw County 13,114 92.2% 92.1% 64.2% 21.5 $30,321 Cullman County 92,604 96.5% 95.6% 80.5% 126.0 $30,977 Dale County 50,067 98.5% 98.1% 81.2% 89.2 $29,344 Dallas County 35,545 81.2% 79.0% 79.6% 36.3 $24,368 DeKalb County 73,122 91.6% 90.2% 79.6% 94.1 $25,274 Elmore County 91,042 92.9% 92.1% 94.5% 147.2 $36,616 Escambia County 36,630 73.9% 50.6% 84.3% 38.7 $22,916 Etowah County 103,207 92.2% 91.2% 89.7% 192.9 $29,553 Fayette County 15,863 95.7% 95.6% 58.8% 25.3 $27,734 Franklin County 31,874 98.7% 98.7% 76.3% 50.3 $26,036 Geneva County 27,259 92.5% 91.3% 74.4% 47.4 $26,880 Greene County 7,127 72.2% 71.2% 58.5% 11.0 $20,372 Hale County 15,116 67.3% 65.2% 65.6% 23.5 $26,024 Henry County 18,141 90.3% 88.8% 64.5% 32.3 $31,809 Houston County 109,366 95.5% 94.5% 95.4% 188.6 $33,053 Jackson County 53,780 99.4% 99.4% 70.2% 49.9 $28,452 Jefferson County 664,744 97.7% 96.7% 97.8% 598.0 $39,826 Lamar County 13,543 100.0% 100.0% 60.5% 22.4 $24,169 Lauderdale County 97,502 92.6% 91.8% 91.4% 146.0 $33,595 Lawrence County 33,567 96.8% 96.7% 84.5% 48.6 $31,189 Lee County 187,847 98.1% 96.9% 94.9% 309.2 $34,504 Limestone County 118,942 93.7% 92.2% 93.7% 212.4 $39,587 Lowndes County 9,485 45.9% 42.8% 42.6% 13.2 $24,965 Macon County 18,159 76.6% 74.6% 70.8% 29.8 $24,595 Madison County 423,355 98.9% 98.8% 98.2% 528.1 $46,784 Marengo County 18,512 80.7% 74.5% 75.2% 18.9 $27,957 Marion County 29,323 100.0% 100.0% 73.7% 39.5 $26,555 Marshall County 102,156 94.8% 94.2% 81.4% 180.5 $31,025 Mobile County 412,339 93.1% 91.7% 97.8% 335.4 $32,032 Monroe County 19,057 73.0% 42.7% 56.2% 18.6 $23,470 Montgomery County 225,894 98.2% 97.6% 98.4% 287.6 $33,404 Morgan County 126,084 99.4% 99.0% 90.6% 217.5 $34,510 Perry County 7,719 36.1% 33.3% 63.7% 10.7 $16,960 Pickens County 18,508 53.6% 51.5% 62.7% 21.0 $26,328 Pike County 33,124 98.3% 98.1% 79.6% 49.3 $27,762 Randolph County 23,067 44.7% 38.5% 54.8% 39.7 $29,488 Russell County 58,837 99.0% 98.9% 95.5% 91.8 $27,383 Shelby County 235,969 94.9% 92.6% 96.2% 300.4 $47,914 St. Clair County 96,927 89.7% 87.8% 82.9% 153.5 $34,937 Sumter County 11,607 48.5% 42.4% 68.3% 12.8 $19,854 Talladega County 81,375 90.0% 88.0% 85.4% 110.4 $29,774 Tallapoosa County 40,699 94.3% 93.1% 67.1% 56.8 $31,718 Tuscaloosa County 241,212 94.4% 92.5% 93.5% 182.6 $33,674 Walker County 65,260 74.8% 68.3% 76.8% 82.5 $28,706 Washington County 15,018 49.5% 44.9% 44.7% 13.9 $31,555 Wilcox County 9,865 41.1% 35.9% 41.9% 11.1 $23,366 Winston County 23,868 92.8% 92.1% 59.6% 38.9 $27,258 Alaska 740,130 85.2% 77.8% 55.5% 1.3 $44,928 Aleutians East Borough 3,632 82.7% 82.7% 26.7% 0.5 $46,293 Aleutians West Census Area 5,424 72.4% 72.4% 69.0% 1.2 $52,596 Anchorage Municipality 289,600 98.9% 97.5% 60.6% 169.7 $49,338 Bethel Census Area 18,237 32.3% 32.3% 22.9% 0.4 $24,976 Bristol Bay Borough 884 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8 $59,725 Chugach Census Area 6,604 58.0% 58.0% 50.4% 0.7 $45,898 Copper River Census Area 2,631 88.4% 88.4% 18.1% 0.1 $38,788 Denali Borough 1,621 35.8% 35.8% 41.8% 0.1 $73,423 Dillingham Census Area 4,642 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3 $34,097 Fairbanks North Star Borough 94,951 95.8% 77.4% 59.2% 12.9 $44,666 Haines Borough 2,104 80.0% 80.0% 0.0% 0.9 $38,529 Hoonah-Angoon Census Area 2,312 81.1% 39.2% 36.2% 0.4 $38,180 Juneau City and Borough 31,572 98.5% 97.8% 67.5% 11.7 $51,146 Kenai Peninsula Borough 61,259 91.0% 39.4% 51.5% 3.8 $42,899 Ketchikan Gateway Borough 13,677 99.0% 99.0% 87.7% 2.8 $46,608 Kodiak Island Borough 12,654 87.6% 87.6% 62.4% 1.9 $40,615 Kusilvak Census Area 7,946 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5 $16,657 Lake and Peninsula Borough 1,315 6.7% 6.7% 0.0% 0.1 $45,228 Matanuska-Susitna Borough 117,610 74.1% 74.1% 64.5% 4.8 $40,945 Nome Census Area 9,836 36.8% 36.8% 11.0% 0.4 $30,047 North Slope Borough 10,663 67.4% 67.4% 0.0% 0.1 $60,295 Northwest Arctic Borough 7,134 46.8% 46.8% 36.3% 0.2 $28,467 Petersburg Borough 3,436 92.9% 92.9% 0.0% 1.2 $42,380 Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area 5,746 33.0% 33.0% 10.9% 1.1 $35,162 Sitka City and Borough 8,355 96.7% 96.7% 84.9% 2.9 $45,532 Skagway Municipality 1,119 85.7% 85.7% 71.7% 2.6 $53,798 Southeast Fairbanks Census Area 7,313 24.0% 14.9% 32.8% 0.3 $38,918 Wrangell City and Borough 2,064 81.3% 81.3% 64.5% 0.8 $37,017 Yakutat City and Borough 690 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1 $50,644 Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area 5,099 0.3% 0.3% 11.9% 0.0 $32,096 American Samoa 44,440 37.7% 37.7% 97.0% 582.0 N/A Eastern District 15,132 39.6% 39.6% 92.9% 601.8 N/A Manu'a District 747 0.0% 0.0% 79.8% 33.6 N/A Western District 28,561 37.8% 37.8% 99.6% 20.3 N/A Arizona 7,582,366 96.1% 88.4% 97.3% 66.7 $40,736 Apache County 64,800 24.0% 0.6% 24.2% 5.8 $20,100 Cochise County 125,773 85.0% 67.3% 97.3% 20.3 $32,708 Coconino County 145,161 86.2% 68.6% 89.4% 7.8 $35,810 Gila County 54,073 82.8% 75.4% 79.7% 11.4 $32,645 Graham County 40,242 87.1% 83.1% 96.4% 8.7 $26,094 Greenlee County 9,410 84.5% 70.1% 91.6% 5.1 $32,028 La Paz County 16,992 66.0% 51.7% 96.8% 3.8 $33,413 Maricopa County 4,673,096 99.2% 93.4% 99.8% 507.8 $44,210 Mohave County 226,479 89.2% 87.5% 96.9% 17.0 $34,178 Navajo County 109,516 57.1% 45.6% 46.6% 11.0 $24,347 Pima County 1,080,149 97.0% 88.6% 98.5% 117.6 $38,564 Pinal County 513,845 97.5% 79.6% 99.1% 95.8 $35,245 Santa Cruz County 50,508 83.0% 64.5% 93.3% 40.9 $25,634 Yavapai County 252,012 92.1% 82.6% 92.4% 31.0 $39,890 Yuma County 220,310 97.4% 94.7% 99.5% 40.0 $28,918 Arkansas 3,088,354 92.3% 89.3% 89.5% 59.4 $33,147 Arkansas County 16,050 94.7% 82.4% 85.3% 16.2 $30,130 Ashley County 17,984 93.0% 91.1% 73.5% 19.4 $24,754 Baxter County 43,007 99.6% 99.4% 80.4% 77.6 $30,900 Benton County 321,566 89.2% 85.7% 97.3% 379.3 $45,335 Boone County 38,636 74.3% 61.3% 83.2% 65.5 $29,583 Bradley County 9,935 92.8% 92.1% 75.0% 15.3 $25,607 Calhoun County 4,690 88.3% 86.0% 45.7% 7.5 $26,261 Carroll County 28,968 65.6% 52.8% 82.1% 46.0 $29,107 Chicot County 9,272 77.3% 53.2% 94.3% 14.6 $24,003 Clark County 20,920 98.9% 96.7% 79.5% 24.2 $26,153 Clay County 14,112 98.4% 97.3% 85.5% 22.1 $27,614 Cleburne County 25,646 96.9% 93.6% 76.6% 46.3 $32,380 Cleveland County 7,367 39.0% 38.4% 41.7% 12.3 $27,496 Columbia County 22,024 84.7% 83.3% 78.5% 28.7 $25,947 Conway County 21,422 79.0% 66.1% 82.0% 38.8 $28,521 Craighead County 115,852 97.0% 96.5% 97.4% 163.8 $32,319 Crawford County 62,258 98.0% 96.8% 90.8% 104.6 $28,935 Crittenden County 46,633 97.4% 96.8% 98.2% 76.1 $28,221 Cross County 16,194 96.3% 95.3% 81.7% 26.3 $28,569 Dallas County 6,076 76.9% 72.3% 73.8% 9.1 $27,474 Desha County 10,321 90.7% 70.8% 91.5% 13.9 $22,848 Drew County 16,935 69.4% 66.0% 73.2% 20.4 $26,563 Faulkner County 131,611 89.1% 85.2% 95.2% 203.3 $33,465 Franklin County 17,586 96.0% 95.1% 85.7% 28.9 $27,137 Fulton County 12,546 98.6% 98.6% 63.7% 20.3 $23,128 Garland County 99,902 96.9% 93.8% 94.4% 147.4 $32,793 Grant County 18,546 96.2% 94.1% 73.5% 29.4 $36,832 Greene County 46,928 100.0% 100.0% 88.5% 81.3 $27,650 Hempstead County 19,105 88.3% 86.7% 76.0% 26.3 $26,620 Hot Spring County 33,313 99.1% 99.0% 73.0% 54.2 $26,304 Howard County 12,387 84.9% 81.5% 77.0% 21.1 $25,639 Independence County 38,345 80.9% 76.3% 81.7% 50.2 $30,007 Izard County 14,291 88.1% 86.9% 62.6% 24.6 $24,443 Jackson County 16,673 80.6% 78.6% 92.4% 26.3 $24,194 Jefferson County 63,672 92.5% 90.9% 95.6% 73.0 $25,317 Johnson County 26,172 90.8% 89.9% 83.8% 39.6 $24,865 Lafayette County 6,015 92.8% 80.0% 64.7% 11.4 $22,393 Lawrence County 16,305 98.2% 98.0% 84.1% 27.8 $26,104 Lee County 8,104 73.3% 51.0% 70.6% 13.5 $21,687 Lincoln County 12,868 39.9% 34.1% 56.0% 23.0 $18,302 Little River County 11,626 90.9% 84.0% 69.9% 21.9 $28,791 Logan County 21,457 93.9% 92.7% 77.0% 30.3 $29,471 Lonoke County 76,389 98.7% 96.5% 96.5% 99.0 $34,081 Madison County 17,865 93.4% 93.1% 58.1% 21.4 $28,869 Marion County 17,593 65.9% 58.8% 71.5% 29.5 $26,461 Miller County 41,958 99.9% 99.9% 89.1% 67.2 $28,025 Mississippi County 38,095 95.2% 93.1% 98.3% 42.2 $30,350 Monroe County 6,415 88.5% 48.0% 72.1% 10.6 $25,956 Montgomery County 8,510 62.2% 57.7% 57.0% 10.9 $28,786 Nevada County 8,004 68.3% 67.3% 58.5% 13.0 $23,002 Newton County 7,026 6.7% 3.6% 42.6% 8.6 $27,063 Ouachita County 21,684 89.2% 85.9% 77.2% 29.6 $26,339 Perry County 10,251 96.8% 95.8% 53.2% 18.6 $29,441 Phillips County 14,661 85.3% 80.9% 94.6% 21.2 $22,360 Pike County 10,027 99.5% 99.5% 69.4% 16.7 $29,522 Poinsett County 22,300 96.0% 95.7% 88.4% 29.4 $25,587 Polk County 19,434 69.9% 54.7% 76.7% 22.7 $32,243 Pope County 64,829 92.7% 84.9% 91.4% 79.9 $29,516 Prairie County 7,935 81.7% 46.6% 76.1% 12.3 $31,979 Pulaski County 401,209 98.4% 97.8% 99.1% 529.1 $39,780 Randolph County 19,040 95.5% 95.3% 66.5% 29.2 $27,416 Saline County 131,252 95.3% 92.8% 93.4% 181.4 $38,149 Scott County 9,837 93.7% 93.5% 69.2% 11.0 $23,837 Searcy County 7,836 82.1% 77.0% 60.6% 11.8 $22,545 Sebastian County 130,035 99.0% 98.4% 96.7% 244.8 $34,275 Sevier County 15,735 90.8% 88.8% 80.2% 27.9 $25,685 Sharp County 18,130 93.6% 90.3% 58.3% 30.0 $26,959 St. Francis County 21,822 86.9% 82.3% 92.6% 34.4 $22,296 Stone County 12,785 56.1% 39.4% 54.4% 21.1 $23,196 Union County 37,008 80.7% 74.1% 78.5% 35.6 $30,968 Van Buren County 16,152 99.2% 99.1% 60.6% 22.8 $27,284 Washington County 266,184 99.7% 99.1% 95.5% 282.7 $36,545 White County 79,091 87.4% 79.5% 87.0% 76.5 $28,459 Woodruff County 5,808 67.9% 53.0% 91.2% 9.9 $29,471 Yell County 20,134 72.8% 69.0% 76.3% 21.6 $26,871 California 39,431,214 98.4% 95.5% 98.7% 253.0 $47,977 Alameda County 1,649,058 99.9% 99.3% 99.4% 236.1 $63,442 Alpine County 1,099 32.8% 27.7% 37.9% 1.5 $53,247 Amador County 42,026 78.9% 55.9% 74.3% 70.7 $42,602 Butte County 208,334 95.9% 86.6% 95.1% 127.3 $37,965 Calaveras County 46,505 88.8% 62.2% 78.2% 45.6 $41,078 Colusa County 22,074 98.5% 66.0% 98.4% 19.2 $32,776 Contra Costa County 1,172,607 99.8% 99.2% 99.3% 635.6 $61,727 Del Norte County 27,009 93.0% 84.6% 87.4% 26.8 $31,008 El Dorado County 192,823 98.0% 72.9% 92.5% 112.9 $57,916 Fresno County 1,024,124 99.0% 92.1% 99.2% 171.9 $31,777 Glenn County 28,304 97.9% 65.1% 95.9% 21.5 $30,697 Humboldt County 132,380 97.8% 84.1% 87.4% 37.1 $36,082 Imperial County 181,724 91.4% 88.3% 99.5% 43.5 $22,702 Inyo County 18,485 90.9% 88.1% 93.6% 1.8 $40,569 Kern County 922,529 98.3% 93.5% 98.9% 113.4 $29,238 Kings County 154,913 95.8% 82.8% 99.9% 111.4 $26,420 Lake County 67,764 93.3% 85.2% 94.1% 53.9 $34,768 Lassen County 28,340 67.9% 55.7% 88.6% 6.2 $25,852 Los Angeles County 9,757,176 99.3% 98.7% 99.7% 403.7 $44,319 Madera County 165,432 95.2% 75.2% 97.2% 77.4 $29,698 Marin County 256,391 99.1% 97.6% 92.5% 492.7 $90,408 Mariposa County 17,048 11.7% 7.7% 50.1% 11.8 $39,798 Mendocino County 89,175 89.8% 72.7% 74.0% 25.4 $37,230 Merced County 296,774 99.9% 84.8% 99.7% 153.1 $27,711 Modoc County 8,491 51.4% 36.0% 78.3% 2.2 $30,660 Mono County 12,991 81.2% 78.1% 93.3% 4.3 $49,271 Monterey County 436,251 99.0% 92.8% 97.0% 132.9 $39,523 Napa County 132,727 97.8% 92.4% 95.1% 177.4 $57,795 Nevada County 102,195 90.9% 70.6% 78.4% 106.7 $49,935 Orange County 3,170,412 99.6% 98.7% 99.9% 998.8 $52,816 Placer County 433,822 98.5% 90.5% 96.3% 308.3 $56,902 Plumas County 18,834 68.6% 45.3% 73.7% 7.4 $41,604 Riverside County 2,529,933 97.0% 95.6% 99.7% 350.9 $37,162 Sacramento County 1,611,231 99.9% 97.9% 99.4% 669.2 $41,989 San Benito County 69,159 96.9% 86.9% 96.0% 49.8 $43,524 San Bernardino County 2,214,278 97.6% 96.2% 99.7% 110.3 $33,180 San Diego County 3,298,799 96.6% 93.8% 99.4% 783.5 $49,891 San Francisco County 827,526 100.0% 99.2% 100.0% 639.2 $90,285 San Joaquin County 816,108 99.8% 93.2% 99.8% 586.1 $36,192 San Luis Obispo County 281,843 97.0% 85.3% 97.3% 85.4 $49,581 San Mateo County 742,893 99.6% 98.6% 98.5% 655.9 $81,980 Santa Barbara County 444,500 96.9% 95.2% 98.5% 162.6 $46,679 Santa Clara County 1,926,323 99.9% 98.5% 98.9% 492.0 $77,018 Santa Cruz County 262,406 98.9% 95.6% 82.8% 589.5 $55,717 Shasta County 181,121 91.2% 75.3% 92.4% 48.0 $38,746 Sierra County 3,113 43.6% 33.7% 57.6% 3.3 $40,612 Siskiyou County 42,498 79.7% 70.8% 80.3% 6.8 $34,074 Solano County 455,101 99.7% 96.9% 99.6% 553.8 $44,139 Sonoma County 485,375 96.6% 95.0% 96.0% 308.1 $54,941 Stanislaus County 556,972 99.9% 93.1% 99.5% 372.3 $33,653 Sutter County 98,545 100.0% 90.9% 99.6% 163.5 $34,330 Tehama County 64,451 93.8% 51.2% 93.3% 21.9 $35,527 Trinity County 15,642 35.9% 1.2% 22.1% 4.9 $32,271 Tulare County 483,540 98.5% 84.2% 98.7% 100.2 $27,550 Tuolumne County 53,893 89.4% 66.6% 89.2% 24.3 $41,372 Ventura County 835,427 98.5% 97.5% 99.1% 453.8 $48,416 Yolo County 225,251 99.6% 92.0% 99.7% 222.0 $43,607 Yuba County 87,469 94.4% 78.8% 94.7% 138.4 $32,854 Colorado 5,957,471 97.4% 92.1% 96.5% 57.5 $50,489 Adams County 542,973 99.3% 97.8% 99.5% 465.4 $40,167 Alamosa County 16,689 99.1% 87.8% 94.7% 23.1 $29,622 Arapahoe County 666,916 99.9% 99.3% 99.6% 835.9 $51,942 Archuleta County 14,112 79.7% 45.3% 80.2% 10.5 $43,049 Baca County 3,367 74.3% 42.0% 67.5% 1.3 $28,598 Bent County 5,779 95.3% 47.9% 86.6% 3.8 $20,360 Boulder County 330,262 99.0% 95.7% 96.2% 454.7 $60,272 Broomfield County 78,323 99.9% 99.3% 100.0% 375.7 $62,948 Chaffee County 20,780 77.4% 67.0% 91.9% 20.5 $43,357 Cheyenne County 1,712 65.3% 19.2% 76.5% 1.0 $38,468 Clear Creek County 9,076 75.1% 48.8% 61.7% 23.0 $65,848 Conejos County 7,549 93.7% 70.9% 44.2% 5.9 $28,155 Costilla County 3,686 87.3% 73.3% 73.4% 3.0 $27,976 Crowley County 5,600 94.0% 19.3% 97.3% 7.1 $19,316 Custer County 5,553 17.3% 1.3% 51.8% 7.5 $43,529 Delta County 32,215 98.8% 97.4% 93.3% 28.2 $35,746 Denver County 728,999 100.0% 99.5% 100.0% 762.4 $61,202 Dolores County 2,467 71.3% 66.2% 71.8% 2.3 $42,092 Douglas County 393,995 99.3% 93.8% 97.9% 468.9 $66,810 Eagle County 54,330 96.2% 93.1% 89.5% 32.3 $62,607 El Paso County 752,772 98.8% 94.3% 98.4% 354.0 $44,250 Elbert County 29,382 93.1% 34.9% 75.9% 15.9 $57,481 Fremont County 50,093 72.8% 67.7% 90.8% 32.7 $30,201 Garfield County 63,167 95.9% 81.6% 91.9% 21.4 $42,253 Gilpin County 5,963 84.6% 69.6% 78.1% 39.7 $58,842 Grand County 16,154 93.5% 67.2% 64.7% 8.7 $49,770 Gunnison County 17,310 90.2% 75.7% 74.5% 5.3 $47,042 Hinsdale County 747 49.9% 49.9% 0.5% 0.7 $46,490 Huerfano County 6,988 78.3% 72.6% 80.8% 4.4 $36,275 Jackson County 1,273 80.0% 48.9% 75.3% 0.8 $34,068 Jefferson County 578,533 98.6% 95.2% 97.8% 756.9 $58,142 Kiowa County 1,392 72.9% 69.8% 78.4% 0.8 $31,339 Kit Carson County 7,080 84.5% 81.5% 89.7% 3.3 $37,807 La Plata County 56,823 83.5% 59.4% 89.8% 33.6 $45,717 Lake County 7,369 87.5% 85.7% 91.1% 19.6 $49,180 Larimer County 374,574 97.3% 90.1% 96.7% 144.3 $49,323 Las Animas County 14,518 80.0% 66.4% 85.2% 3.0 $30,623 Lincoln County 5,598 85.0% 83.9% 55.7% 2.2 $29,350 Logan County 20,755 93.0% 71.8% 82.3% 11.3 $29,538 Mesa County 161,260 98.8% 91.0% 97.7% 48.4 $38,589 Mineral County 933 93.8% 93.8% 52.1% 1.1 $41,950 Moffat County 13,142 89.8% 74.0% 84.1% 2.8 $35,380 Montezuma County 26,841 82.9% 43.9% 93.0% 13.2 $34,667 Montrose County 44,806 98.4% 94.9% 90.0% 20.0 $36,936 Morgan County 30,300 94.8% 83.2% 90.8% 23.7 $31,867 Otero County 17,991 99.0% 79.9% 98.9% 14.3 $28,634 Ouray County 5,197 82.9% 75.0% 76.9% 9.6 $53,914 Park County 18,316 43.7% 18.6% 43.6% 8.4 $53,396 Phillips County 4,488 96.2% 92.4% 34.1% 6.5 $43,285 Pitkin County 16,643 96.0% 85.7% 83.0% 17.1 $105,096 Prowers County 11,957 95.1% 69.5% 93.7% 7.3 $32,128 Pueblo County 169,866 98.5% 96.2% 98.2% 71.2 $33,716 Rio Blanco County 6,607 70.3% 68.1% 48.2% 2.1 $33,375 Rio Grande County 11,132 98.9% 80.4% 80.0% 12.2 $40,132 Routt County 25,243 93.3% 82.1% 79.7% 10.7 $65,003 Saguache County 6,670 92.3% 42.7% 57.7% 2.1 $39,711 San Juan County 821 87.6% 85.4% 84.3% 2.1 $46,192 San Miguel County 7,819 75.9% 71.9% 83.6% 6.1 $64,164 Sedgwick County 2,257 83.3% 77.5% 77.9% 4.1 $34,866 Summit County 30,882 98.1% 95.5% 94.7% 50.8 $58,219 Teller County 24,862 59.0% 49.8% 67.7% 44.6 $46,242 Washington County 4,771 83.8% 13.8% 80.2% 1.9 $36,138 Weld County 369,745 97.1% 87.3% 98.8% 92.8 $41,661 Yuma County 10,048 93.9% 70.1% 75.6% 4.2 $34,352 Connecticut 3,675,120 99.4% 98.9% 92.6% 759.0 $54,409 Capitol Planning Region 992,858 98.8% 97.5% 95.7% 966.4 $49,924 Greater Bridgeport Planning Region 330,363 99.9% 99.0% 96.5% 356.7 $50,592 Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region 180,290 99.7% 99.7% 88.7% 425.1 $56,906 Naugatuck Valley Planning Region 457,624 99.7% 99.6% 94.3% 108.7 $46,063 Northeastern Connecticut Planning Region 99,400 99.1% 98.9% 77.5% 179.5 $44,393 Northwest Hills Planning Region 116,935 99.1% 99.0% 73.6% 148.7 $55,526 South Central Connecticut Planning Region 578,180 99.9% 99.8% 96.1% 574.5 $48,264 Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region 288,960 99.4% 99.3% 90.0% 483.1 $45,691 Western Connecticut Planning Region 630,510 99.6% 99.5% 89.2% 184.9 $79,648 Delaware 1,051,917 98.6% 97.9% 96.9% 539.8 $44,219 Kent County 192,690 97.3% 95.5% 96.2% 328.8 $34,640 New Castle County 588,093 99.6% 99.6% 99.3% 379.4 $46,990 Sussex County 271,134 97.4% 96.1% 92.5% 289.6 $44,963 District of Columbia 702,244 99.9% 99.8% 100.0% 488.4 $75,253 District of Columbia 702,244 99.9% 99.8% 100.0% 488.4 $75,253 Florida 23,372,171 97.6% 96.6% 97.8% 435.6 $41,055 Alachua County 291,782 88.6% 82.9% 96.1% 333.2 $37,981 Baker County 29,325 83.7% 80.1% 74.1% 50.1 $29,167 Bay County 199,718 97.5% 94.6% 99.3% 263.3 $38,856 Bradford County 28,075 50.8% 37.9% 90.6% 95.5 $25,603 Brevard County 658,447 99.1% 98.5% 99.3% 648.7 $42,738 Broward County 2,037,472 99.1% 98.8% 99.8% 694.0 $41,910 Calhoun County 13,278 42.8% 29.6% 81.6% 23.4 $22,965 Charlotte County 212,122 96.1% 94.0% 98.2% 311.4 $40,603 Citrus County 170,174 98.2% 97.6% 85.2% 292.4 $35,586 Clay County 236,760 94.4% 91.5% 97.5% 391.6 $39,166 Collier County 416,233 98.3% 97.1% 93.4% 208.4 $59,973 Columbia County 73,977 100.0% 100.0% 77.1% 92.8 $28,030 DeSoto County 36,744 83.4% 80.2% 94.8% 57.7 $24,462 Dixie County 17,614 99.7% 99.6% 61.0% 25.0 $21,699 Duval County 1,055,159 99.4% 99.3% 99.8% 383.5 $38,827 Escambia County 331,275 96.6% 95.0% 99.3% 504.2 $35,745 Flagler County 136,744 99.4% 98.9% 96.0% 281.2 $43,100 Franklin County 12,979 88.3% 87.2% 87.8% 23.8 $33,893 Gadsden County 44,151 79.1% 77.0% 80.0% 85.5 $23,206 Gilchrist County 20,233 95.7% 95.1% 70.6% 57.9 $33,507 Glades County 13,132 73.4% 70.1% 82.2% 16.3 $25,697 Gulf County 15,876 64.4% 63.1% 78.3% 28.7 $38,258 Hamilton County 14,334 89.0% 88.5% 65.2% 27.9 $18,104 Hardee County 26,068 88.9% 73.3% 95.8% 40.9 $26,225 Hendry County 46,130 89.0% 81.5% 92.7% 39.9 $26,234 Hernando County 218,150 98.6% 98.2% 96.0% 461.2 $33,079 Highlands County 109,778 91.2% 88.2% 95.0% 107.9 $32,982 Hillsborough County 1,581,426 99.6% 98.4% 99.7% 547.6 $41,980 Holmes County 19,876 42.1% 21.4% 55.7% 41.5 $24,505 Indian River County 172,130 98.0% 97.0% 95.2% 342.3 $46,273 Jackson County 49,980 56.8% 47.8% 80.6% 54.4 $23,718 Jefferson County 15,921 72.1% 68.4% 74.9% 26.6 $30,472 Lafayette County 8,640 68.5% 59.9% 76.2% 15.9 $22,165 Lake County 444,204 93.4% 91.2% 96.8% 466.8 $36,956 Lee County 860,959 97.7% 97.0% 98.4% 102.4 $43,365 Leon County 300,488 96.5% 95.9% 98.7% 449.5 $38,777 Levy County 47,765 80.8% 74.1% 75.9% 42.7 $30,739 Liberty County 7,955 38.8% 29.6% 61.2% 9.5 $25,693 Madison County 18,364 95.7% 94.4% 72.2% 26.4 $23,670 Manatee County 458,352 98.6% 98.1% 98.8% 617.1 $44,867 Marion County 428,905 89.8% 87.9% 91.7% 270.0 $32,513 Martin County 165,666 97.4% 96.4% 97.0% 304.6 $52,532 Miami-Dade County 2,838,459 99.5% 99.1% 99.7% 494.0 $37,858 Monroe County 80,908 99.7% 99.6% 96.2% 82.3 $57,683 Nassau County 104,376 91.7% 89.0% 90.2% 160.9 $46,463 Okaloosa County 220,483 95.1% 93.8% 94.2% 237.0 $42,261 Okeechobee County 42,369 82.5% 74.9% 84.3% 55.1 $27,836 Orange County 1,533,646 99.2% 98.5% 99.7% 700.2 $39,640 Osceola County 468,058 98.8% 98.2% 98.8% 352.6 $31,000 Palm Beach County 1,582,055 99.5% 99.3% 99.3% 805.4 $50,998 Pasco County 659,114 98.6% 97.7% 98.8% 882.8 $37,757 Pinellas County 965,868 99.8% 99.7% 99.9% 528.9 $46,580 Polk County 852,873 98.0% 97.3% 97.7% 474.4 $31,927 Putnam County 77,301 75.9% 71.0% 85.6% 106.1 $26,908 Santa Rosa County 207,653 97.1% 95.1% 98.0% 205.1 $41,388 Sarasota County 476,604 99.4% 99.2% 98.4% 857.2 $55,430 Seminole County 494,605 99.3% 99.0% 99.1% 598.7 $44,349 St. Johns County 334,928 98.8% 98.2% 98.9% 557.6 $54,822 St. Lucie County 390,646 97.2% 96.2% 98.3% 683.4 $35,125 Sumter County 154,693 91.6% 89.8% 97.3% 277.7 $46,555 Suwannee County 47,536 88.2% 85.5% 62.1% 69.0 $26,484 Taylor County 21,843 96.6% 96.4% 72.7% 20.9 $26,808 Union County 15,738 56.9% 53.4% 77.6% 64.6 $22,599 Volusia County 602,770 99.2% 98.6% 98.3% 547.3 $37,171 Wakulla County 37,115 74.1% 69.6% 80.6% 61.2 $32,920 Walton County 89,666 96.2% 77.4% 84.6% 86.4 $49,119 Washington County 26,503 86.5% 24.4% 72.4% 45.3 $26,233 Georgia 11,180,871 96.8% 96.2% 92.0% 193.7 $39,525 Appling County 18,669 90.4% 89.6% 66.0% 36.7 $25,218 Atkinson County 8,435 98.9% 98.4% 73.4% 24.6 $23,886 Bacon County 11,045 100.0% 100.0% 71.5% 38.9 $25,969 Baker County 2,732 74.5% 73.2% 57.3% 8.0 $25,017 Baldwin County 43,644 96.8% 96.6% 87.4% 168.7 $32,573 Banks County 20,318 44.9% 39.1% 55.6% 87.3 $32,088 Barrow County 96,294 96.2% 95.1% 89.3% 598.0 $31,914 Bartow County 117,508 92.1% 90.2% 91.3% 256.1 $33,951 Ben Hill County 16,945 99.1% 98.5% 90.4% 67.7 $23,099 Berrien County 18,666 94.0% 92.8% 81.1% 41.2 $26,263 Bibb County 157,056 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 629.8 $31,306 Bleckley County 12,626 95.9% 95.5% 78.3% 58.5 $29,677 Brantley County 18,795 100.0% 100.0% 52.4% 42.4 $25,293 Brooks County 16,344 92.2% 89.4% 76.5% 33.1 $27,303 Bryan County 51,105 100.0% 100.0% 89.7% 116.8 $42,576 Bulloch County 85,454 100.0% 99.9% 78.5% 126.4 $30,450 Burke County 24,472 80.3% 75.2% 79.1% 29.6 $31,580 Butts County 27,127 95.6% 94.7% 80.1% 147.7 $27,924 Calhoun County 5,441 21.8% 13.6% 88.0% 19.4 $19,913 Camden County 59,099 91.2% 90.9% 81.5% 93.8 $34,401 Candler County 11,130 99.9% 99.9% 69.8% 45.8 $25,898 Carroll County 129,911 96.6% 95.6% 80.2% 260.3 $32,201 Catoosa County 68,940 97.8% 97.3% 96.4% 425.1 $35,382 Charlton County 13,021 84.5% 83.5% 49.7% 16.7 $24,015 Chatham County 307,336 98.9% 98.8% 99.4% 709.6 $38,920 Chattahoochee County 8,548 100.0% 100.0% 98.3% 34.4 $26,920 Chattooga County 25,306 89.8% 89.2% 74.8% 80.8 $23,391 Cherokee County 293,513 98.6% 97.9% 96.4% 697.0 $47,337 Clarke County 129,995 99.2% 97.9% 96.5% 90.4 $31,915 Clay County 2,815 84.2% 83.8% 33.1% 14.4 $29,009 Clayton County 297,703 99.8% 99.7% 99.5% 101.6 $26,826 Clinch County 6,871 33.5% 29.8% 82.3% 8.4 $24,906 Cobb County 787,538 99.8% 99.6% 99.7% 317.8 $50,975 Coffee County 43,851 95.2% 94.9% 83.2% 74.0 $23,567 Colquitt County 46,977 92.5% 90.8% 82.7% 85.9 $27,073 Columbia County 167,472 99.1% 98.9% 99.3% 577.1 $42,457 Cook County 17,984 100.0% 100.0% 85.1% 78.7 $25,003 Coweta County 158,233 97.1% 96.6% 87.9% 358.7 $43,281 Crawford County 12,349 100.0% 100.0% 50.1% 38.0 $32,796 Crisp County 19,468 83.0% 82.0% 83.3% 71.4 $28,062 Dade County 16,068 99.4% 99.4% 88.1% 92.4 $32,865 Dawson County 33,748 85.6% 83.6% 71.3% 160.1 $43,291 DeKalb County 770,302 99.4% 99.1% 99.8% 877.1 $45,544 Decatur County 29,391 80.5% 77.6% 82.9% 49.2 $26,544 Dodge County 19,630 96.2% 95.1% 79.2% 39.6 $24,702 Dooly County 11,186 93.4% 92.4% 80.2% 28.5 $27,078 Dougherty County 82,418 96.5% 96.1% 97.4% 250.8 $27,125 Douglas County 151,887 99.2% 99.1% 95.6% 758.9 $35,070 Early County 10,444 78.6% 74.8% 58.0% 20.4 $26,879 Echols County 3,698 44.0% 11.8% 78.3% 8.8 $25,653 Effingham County 73,148 100.0% 100.0% 84.9% 152.8 $37,841 Elbert County 20,152 92.6% 91.7% 74.4% 57.4 $28,743 Emanuel County 23,224 100.0% 100.0% 73.1% 34.1 $24,356 Evans County 10,869 98.8% 98.7% 67.0% 59.4 $26,995 Fannin County 25,854 81.1% 79.1% 57.0% 66.8 $38,719 Fayette County 125,107 98.2% 97.3% 93.6% 643.0 $52,188 Floyd County 101,390 92.2% 90.1% 92.9% 198.9 $32,628 Forsyth County 280,096 99.0% 98.4% 96.4% 247.0 $55,936 Franklin County 25,208 85.4% 83.8% 68.9% 96.5 $29,576 Fulton County 1,090,354 99.9% 99.4% 99.4% 70.2 $61,438 Gilmer County 33,327 97.5% 97.2% 59.3% 78.2 $34,175 Glascock County 3,008 43.2% 43.1% 71.6% 20.9 $26,537 Glynn County 86,540 100.0% 100.0% 90.3% 206.2 $41,042 Gordon County 60,765 94.8% 93.2% 84.5% 170.5 $31,642 Grady County 26,271 98.4% 98.3% 73.3% 57.8 $28,055 Greene County 21,089 94.7% 94.4% 61.1% 54.4 $56,767 Gwinnett County 1,003,869 99.7% 99.5% 99.4% 330.5 $37,588 Habersham County 49,665 96.4% 95.9% 74.6% 179.4 $30,661 Hall County 221,745 96.5% 95.1% 92.3% 564.3 $37,271 Hancock County 8,683 53.6% 53.5% 71.7% 18.4 $19,305 Haralson County 32,404 92.8% 90.2% 72.2% 114.8 $32,715 Harris County 36,929 87.3% 85.9% 54.8% 79.6 $42,883 Hart County 28,052 92.6% 91.1% 77.8% 120.7 $31,280 Heard County 12,119 94.9% 94.3% 54.8% 40.9 $32,800 Henry County 259,315 99.2% 98.8% 96.4% 813.6 $36,051 Houston County 174,897 97.8% 97.2% 98.7% 465.1 $36,079 Irwin County 9,155 98.8% 98.6% 80.1% 25.8 $27,128 Jackson County 93,825 88.3% 85.3% 86.0% 276.2 $35,704 Jasper County 17,219 90.0% 87.3% 62.9% 46.7 $31,661 Jeff Davis County 15,119 98.5% 98.2% 78.6% 45.7 $23,844 Jefferson County 15,019 81.9% 78.3% 80.2% 28.5 $25,591 Jenkins County 8,836 91.9% 91.8% 63.0% 25.4 $21,473 Johnson County 9,178 92.4% 91.2% 69.0% 30.3 $24,652 Jones County 29,047 97.3% 96.2% 79.8% 73.7 $33,522 Lamar County 20,690 97.0% 96.6% 67.2% 112.8 $33,389 Lanier County 10,464 98.1% 98.1% 73.9% 53.2 $25,150 Laurens County 50,287 98.3% 97.6% 81.2% 62.3 $29,642 Lee County 34,073 79.4% 77.3% 91.3% 95.7 $37,641 Liberty County 68,607 100.0% 100.0% 94.5% 132.8 $27,648 Lincoln County 8,049 99.9% 99.9% 62.7% 38.3 $28,988 Long County 20,439 76.4% 73.9% 83.6% 51.0 $26,766 Lowndes County 122,082 100.0% 100.0% 95.2% 245.5 $29,757 Lumpkin County 36,016 93.4% 92.2% 72.4% 127.3 $36,037 Macon County 11,831 82.6% 81.1% 84.0% 29.5 $26,030 Madison County 32,771 65.3% 60.3% 68.9% 116.1 $28,436 Marion County 7,635 75.9% 75.8% 48.2% 20.9 $27,096 McDuffie County 21,764 95.1% 94.2% 91.0% 84.6 $28,071 McIntosh County 11,800 100.0% 100.0% 70.4% 27.4 $29,599 Meriwether County 21,439 76.9% 68.7% 49.5% 42.8 $27,400 Miller County 5,824 56.8% 32.4% 68.1% 20.6 $32,027 Mitchell County 20,329 85.8% 83.8% 70.5% 39.7 $25,820 Monroe County 31,437 98.3% 98.0% 68.2% 79.4 $43,106 Montgomery County 8,566 98.2% 98.2% 75.9% 35.5 $27,633 Morgan County 21,940 92.9% 91.9% 66.9% 63.2 $40,661 Murray County 41,316 91.1% 89.7% 80.8% 119.9 $30,205 Muscogee County 201,830 99.2% 99.0% 99.7% 932.3 $32,811 Newton County 124,010 100.0% 100.0% 88.6% 452.9 $31,537 Oconee County 44,751 97.6% 96.7% 84.6% 242.8 $55,741 Oglethorpe County 16,172 61.6% 57.9% 48.0% 36.8 $32,062 Paulding County 188,549 97.9% 96.8% 94.7% 603.6 $36,776 Peach County 29,213 96.9% 96.7% 92.4% 194.4 $33,624 Pickens County 36,580 91.2% 90.2% 79.4% 157.6 $38,359 Pierce County 20,669 99.5% 99.4% 76.6% 60.7 $29,266 Pike County 20,669 68.6% 67.1% 56.6% 95.7 $36,105 Polk County 44,610 96.6% 95.9% 84.4% 143.7 $27,807 Pulaski County 10,180 97.5% 97.4% 88.7% 40.8 $24,849 Putnam County 23,383 99.3% 99.0% 56.3% 67.8 $42,671 Quitman County 2,323 61.3% 59.9% 70.1% 15.4 $24,325 Rabun County 17,711 71.1% 68.8% 59.6% 47.9 $38,315 Randolph County 6,085 73.3% 69.9% 82.2% 14.2 $21,280 Richmond County 206,303 99.6% 99.5% 99.7% 636.1 $30,209 Rockdale County 97,610 100.0% 100.0% 97.1% 751.9 $34,548 Schley County 4,503 70.3% 64.2% 45.3% 27.0 $30,176 Screven County 14,325 100.0% 100.0% 62.5% 22.2 $29,121 Seminole County 9,274 63.7% 61.8% 82.4% 39.0 $29,184 Spalding County 70,292 99.3% 99.1% 92.4% 358.7 $36,803 Stephens County 27,498 94.5% 93.9% 82.3% 153.7 $27,521 Stewart County 4,809 22.2% 10.3% 82.3% 10.5 $21,024 Sumter County 28,972 85.1% 84.2% 85.3% 60.0 $24,439 Talbot County 5,755 77.2% 75.6% 55.5% 14.7 $28,737 Taliaferro County 1,620 97.9% 97.9% 57.2% 8.3 $24,228 Tattnall County 24,275 100.0% 100.0% 76.3% 50.5 $21,462 Taylor County 7,783 97.7% 97.2% 71.8% 20.7 $25,791 Telfair County 11,000 66.3% 61.3% 83.8% 25.2 $17,226 Terrell County 8,698 81.9% 81.6% 73.6% 25.9 $24,665 Thomas County 46,054 92.6% 89.9% 80.3% 84.6 $33,284 Tift County 41,708 100.0% 100.0% 88.8% 159.9 $29,381 Toombs County 27,488 99.9% 99.9% 77.7% 75.5 $27,940 Towns County 13,184 86.7% 82.6% 75.5% 79.2 $39,773 Treutlen County 6,420 100.0% 100.0% 86.5% 32.2 $25,728 Troup County 71,513 94.9% 94.1% 93.7% 172.7 $31,830 Turner County 9,023 94.7% 94.5% 80.2% 31.6 $23,275 Twiggs County 7,728 78.7% 75.6% 60.1% 21.5 $32,037 Union County 27,601 77.4% 74.4% 61.6% 85.7 $40,312 Upson County 28,358 98.5% 98.3% 74.9% 87.7 $29,772 Walker County 69,340 96.8% 96.2% 90.0% 155.3 $30,482 Walton County 109,792 89.0% 86.9% 89.5% 335.9 $36,752 Ware County 36,222 92.8% 88.4% 88.6% 40.3 $23,550 Warren County 5,148 61.4% 60.8% 58.1% 18.1 $24,793 Washington County 19,834 96.6% 95.4% 82.3% 29.2 $24,825 Wayne County 32,132 84.6% 83.0% 76.5% 50.1 $25,077 Webster County 2,315 40.9% 31.8% 73.3% 11.0 $25,407 Wheeler County 7,076 95.0% 94.1% 52.6% 23.9 $19,272 White County 29,668 95.9% 95.5% 68.6% 123.2 $34,519 Whitfield County 105,070 96.6% 96.2% 91.4% 361.8 $30,593 Wilcox County 8,904 82.1% 74.4% 82.0% 23.6 $21,028 Wilkes County 9,567 99.9% 99.9% 66.2% 20.4 $30,123 Wilkinson County 8,667 94.3% 93.0% 71.0% 19.3 $25,742 Worth County 20,262 83.7% 83.1% 71.2% 35.5 $28,059 Guam 169,532 98.2% 60.5% 96.4% 807.8 N/A Guam 169,532 98.2% 60.5% 96.4% 807.8 N/A Hawaii 1,446,138 97.9% 97.7% 97.6% 225.2 $44,823 Hawaii County 209,790 93.2% 92.8% 91.1% 52.1 $38,406 Honolulu County 998,739 98.8% 98.7% 99.6% 662.8 $46,361 Kalawao County 81 86.4% 86.4% 0.0% 6.8 $39,742 Kauai County 73,840 97.9% 97.9% 94.8% 119.1 $42,553 Maui County 163,688 98.2% 98.1% 95.4% 140.9 $44,403 Idaho 2,001,617 94.6% 79.5% 95.8% 24.2 $37,169 Ada County 535,799 99.5% 95.3% 99.8% 509.3 $47,768 Adams County 4,998 59.7% 38.9% 69.4% 3.7 $36,308 Bannock County 91,010 95.2% 87.0% 98.4% 81.8 $32,268 Bear Lake County 6,779 65.3% 25.7% 86.9% 6.9 $32,301 Benewah County 10,529 51.6% 30.8% 50.1% 13.6 $31,054 Bingham County 50,889 99.2% 59.3% 98.2% 24.3 $31,676 Blaine County 25,261 91.4% 86.1% 91.8% 9.6 $51,123 Boise County 8,581 16.7% 14.8% 53.4% 4.5 $38,398 Bonner County 53,955 70.4% 35.2% 75.5% 31.1 $37,755 Bonneville County 133,644 98.4% 89.4% 99.2% 71.6 $34,508 Boundary County 14,040 92.1% 30.6% 79.7% 11.1 $29,672 Butte County 2,735 53.3% 48.7% 86.8% 1.2 $25,940 Camas County 1,247 12.3% 0.0% 49.6% 1.2 $29,735 Canyon County 266,892 98.8% 83.0% 99.7% 454.6 $30,761 Caribou County 7,239 55.5% 49.1% 88.9% 4.1 $30,255 Cassia County 25,976 97.5% 67.8% 97.8% 10.1 $30,688 Clark County 794 78.0% 77.3% 81.0% 0.5 $22,917 Clearwater County 9,149 100.0% 37.6% 60.8% 3.7 $31,608 Custer County 4,597 76.4% 71.5% 69.2% 0.9 $29,993 Elmore County 29,729 79.9% 68.4% 97.3% 9.7 $30,146 Franklin County 15,638 63.5% 20.9% 83.6% 23.6 $30,698 Fremont County 14,399 91.0% 49.5% 96.7% 7.7 $32,085 Gem County 21,857 93.0% 64.2% 95.5% 39.0 $34,695 Gooding County 16,189 99.1% 51.2% 98.6% 22.2 $29,647 Idaho County 17,912 100.0% 2.9% 69.5% 2.1 $32,073 Jefferson County 34,854 99.1% 64.8% 99.2% 31.9 $30,733 Jerome County 26,056 99.3% 61.2% 99.4% 43.6 $29,033 Kootenai County 188,323 91.5% 83.5% 94.5% 152.1 $38,797 Latah County 42,180 100.0% 74.1% 92.4% 39.2 $35,157 Lemhi County 8,397 82.2% 55.7% 80.9% 1.8 $33,896 Lewis County 3,728 100.0% 0.2% 84.0% 7.8 $29,737 Lincoln County 5,556 94.2% 29.9% 97.1% 4.6 $28,597 Madison County 55,549 99.6% 91.4% 99.8% 118.4 $23,024 Minidoka County 22,691 99.6% 85.8% 99.7% 30.0 $31,693 Nez Perce County 42,847 100.0% 86.1% 94.3% 50.5 $37,859 Oneida County 4,976 93.3% 92.8% 93.9% 4.2 $30,895 Owyhee County 12,748 71.0% 48.9% 80.0% 1.7 $26,059 Payette County 27,662 96.7% 77.8% 99.0% 68.0 $30,362 Power County 8,381 97.7% 68.9% 94.7% 6.0 $25,083 Shoshone County 14,074 86.4% 85.6% 76.3% 5.3 $27,965 Teton County 12,932 74.8% 62.2% 97.2% 28.8 $46,968 Twin Falls County 96,509 99.2% 83.9% 97.8% 50.2 $33,505 Valley County 12,777 49.3% 48.2% 87.4% 3.5 $38,932 Washington County 11,539 87.2% 62.2% 94.8% 7.9 $27,769 Illinois 12,710,155 98.3% 95.4% 97.9% 229.0 $45,104 Adams County 64,109 97.1% 93.4% 90.7% 75.0 $36,317 Alexander County 4,594 100.0% 100.0% 85.1% 19.5 $25,261 Bond County 16,576 100.0% 100.0% 89.6% 43.6 $32,665 Boone County 53,313 95.0% 91.1% 99.8% 189.9 $38,437 Brown County 6,307 90.6% 55.2% 78.7% 20.6 $26,527 Bureau County 32,486 90.3% 78.3% 84.1% 37.4 $36,625 Calhoun County 4,224 72.8% 54.9% 57.6% 16.6 $33,749 Carroll County 15,444 86.1% 74.8% 52.2% 34.7 $32,921 Cass County 12,713 94.1% 92.6% 85.9% 33.8 $32,047 Champaign County 212,374 98.8% 93.7% 99.0% 213.2 $37,366 Christian County 33,247 88.6% 83.2% 96.3% 46.9 $31,989 Clark County 15,076 72.5% 64.8% 80.0% 30.1 $35,425 Clay County 12,821 100.0% 100.0% 82.3% 27.4 $33,212 Clinton County 37,087 100.0% 100.0% 93.0% 78.3 $41,334 Coles County 46,423 97.9% 82.8% 95.6% 91.3 $33,965 Cook County 5,182,616 99.9% 99.7% 100.0% 484.7 $47,801 Crawford County 18,388 76.3% 67.5% 77.8% 41.4 $34,276 Cumberland County 10,305 98.0% 51.0% 84.3% 29.8 $36,270 De Witt County 15,319 95.9% 76.1% 96.5% 38.5 $36,977 DeKalb County 101,335 96.5% 91.2% 98.6% 160.5 $35,054 Douglas County 19,824 98.3% 73.4% 95.3% 47.6 $34,630 DuPage County 937,142 99.9% 99.8% 100.0% 858.9 $57,051 Edgar County 16,398 88.2% 70.0% 87.7% 26.3 $33,566 Edwards County 5,984 100.0% 100.0% 80.3% 26.9 $31,314 Effingham County 34,602 99.9% 82.1% 87.8% 72.3 $38,582 Fayette County 21,157 99.5% 59.1% 82.8% 29.5 $30,865 Ford County 13,451 97.0% 79.2% 91.4% 27.7 $32,674 Franklin County 37,033 100.0% 100.0% 93.9% 90.6 $29,659 Fulton County 32,510 91.9% 85.0% 84.7% 37.6 $33,706 Gallatin County 4,690 100.0% 100.0% 67.2% 14.5 $39,976 Greene County 11,417 91.2% 52.0% 89.2% 21.0 $33,174 Grundy County 53,835 95.1% 87.4% 97.2% 128.8 $43,744 Hamilton County 7,818 78.1% 64.9% 84.6% 18.0 $35,585 Hancock County 17,008 90.2% 77.9% 65.5% 21.4 $36,671 Hardin County 3,550 97.3% 97.3% 29.5% 20.0 $30,158 Henderson County 6,048 83.4% 75.4% 54.2% 16.0 $32,763 Henry County 48,177 97.1% 87.1% 92.6% 58.5 $38,767 Iroquois County 26,067 89.3% 68.7% 91.5% 23.3 $34,719 Jackson County 53,199 93.1% 76.1% 91.8% 91.2 $30,227 Jasper County 9,092 81.2% 55.6% 77.4% 18.4 $36,847 Jefferson County 36,107 98.0% 95.8% 81.6% 63.2 $31,541 Jersey County 21,150 89.9% 64.9% 79.4% 57.2 $38,238 Jo Daviess County 21,528 95.6% 88.5% 80.8% 35.8 $42,797 Johnson County 13,320 82.7% 52.9% 59.2% 38.8 $28,028 Kane County 520,997 99.1% 98.0% 100.0% 3.1 $46,013 Kankakee County 106,410 97.6% 87.6% 98.5% 157.3 $35,005 Kendall County 143,171 99.5% 93.5% 99.6% 447.1 $43,127 Knox County 48,716 96.5% 92.8% 90.8% 68.0 $29,614 LaSalle County 108,390 95.9% 86.5% 96.6% 95.5 $38,079 Lake County 718,604 99.7% 99.1% 100.0% 619.9 $55,756 Lawrence County 14,801 94.5% 60.5% 91.5% 39.8 $30,702 Lee County 33,544 74.8% 68.0% 79.8% 46.3 $35,065 Livingston County 35,375 92.8% 73.1% 95.0% 33.9 $36,002 Logan County 27,518 98.1% 82.0% 95.2% 44.5 $34,109 Macon County 100,737 96.8% 94.2% 98.1% 173.5 $35,850 Macoupin County 43,895 92.2% 73.1% 80.6% 50.9 $35,389 Madison County 263,017 98.9% 97.0% 98.6% 367.6 $40,869 Marion County 36,437 99.2% 73.9% 86.7% 63.6 $32,199 Marshall County 11,552 87.5% 70.9% 85.2% 29.9 $36,065 Mason County 12,543 85.2% 78.7% 83.8% 23.3 $34,783 Massac County 13,627 100.0% 100.0% 82.9% 57.5 $31,578 McDonough County 26,662 98.2% 97.1% 90.9% 45.2 $30,785 McHenry County 315,959 97.4% 94.8% 100.0% 523.6 $48,275 McLean County 172,067 98.2% 92.9% 98.6% 145.4 $42,362 Menard County 11,963 82.9% 73.4% 90.5% 38.1 $41,888 Mercer County 15,292 86.8% 72.5% 75.2% 27.2 $36,295 Monroe County 34,969 83.9% 79.3% 91.4% 90.8 $49,438 Montgomery County 27,615 91.2% 70.6% 90.8% 39.2 $32,463 Morgan County 32,618 90.1% 76.0% 92.7% 57.3 $35,840 Moultrie County 14,365 93.6% 70.6% 80.9% 42.8 $35,896 Ogle County 51,345 84.5% 75.0% 81.2% 67.7 $38,251 Peoria County 179,630 97.7% 94.3% 97.4% 290.3 $39,756 Perry County 20,272 100.0% 100.0% 92.1% 45.9 $29,720 Piatt County 16,628 94.3% 79.3% 97.7% 37.9 $43,547 Pike County 14,258 86.2% 53.8% 82.0% 17.2 $30,438 Pope County 3,703 100.0% 100.0% 50.8% 10.0 $31,016 Pulaski County 4,879 62.2% 31.5% 89.4% 24.5 $24,463 Putnam County 5,633 85.7% 67.9% 61.3% 35.2 $40,036 Randolph County 29,903 73.1% 67.2% 88.7% 52.0 $31,900 Richland County 15,362 100.0% 100.0% 95.8% 42.7 $32,156 Rock Island County 142,731 99.0% 97.3% 98.2% 333.9 $35,753 Saline County 22,826 100.0% 100.0% 92.0% 60.1 $35,665 Sangamon County 194,345 97.6% 93.8% 98.6% 223.8 $42,851 Schuyler County 6,750 74.8% 67.3% 70.6% 15.4 $33,077 Scott County 4,880 91.5% 56.2% 82.2% 19.5 $36,508 Shelby County 20,542 92.2% 57.0% 83.4% 27.1 $33,372 St. Clair County 251,149 96.2% 92.6% 99.3% 381.9 $37,824 Stark County 5,272 94.4% 69.1% 87.8% 18.3 $34,270 Stephenson County 43,088 97.4% 78.1% 81.9% 76.4 $34,672 Tazewell County 129,821 96.7% 93.2% 96.9% 200.8 $40,072 Union County 16,886 100.0% 100.0% 83.9% 40.8 $31,962 Vermilion County 71,106 94.4% 85.0% 97.2% 79.2 $30,447 Wabash County 10,979 73.6% 66.4% 66.5% 49.2 $36,323 Warren County 16,217 93.8% 80.2% 88.7% 29.9 $33,620 Washington County 13,535 75.2% 59.8% 87.0% 24.1 $38,507 Wayne County 15,928 92.8% 84.7% 82.1% 22.3 $31,073 White County 13,395 88.7% 65.0% 88.1% 27.1 $30,769 Whiteside County 54,657 93.6% 86.3% 92.8% 79.9 $36,788 Will County 708,583 99.4% 97.8% 99.9% 847.7 $46,216 Williamson County 67,064 99.1% 97.9% 94.7% 159.6 $37,096 Winnebago County 283,790 98.8% 96.3% 99.2% 553.1 $34,775 Woodford County 38,290 91.8% 83.4% 91.8% 72.6 $43,032 Indiana 6,924,272 96.4% 92.3% 94.4% 193.3 $37,178 Adams County 36,584 96.7% 59.7% 84.5% 107.9 $27,765 Allen County 399,295 99.5% 93.7% 99.8% 607.5 $36,432 Bartholomew County 84,741 93.5% 91.8% 93.1% 208.2 $41,174 Benton County 8,853 84.6% 9.2% 68.8% 21.8 $33,363 Blackford County 11,816 87.6% 56.3% 92.1% 71.6 $28,774 Boone County 78,773 93.9% 85.6% 97.5% 186.3 $58,340 Brown County 15,650 87.1% 83.5% 52.2% 50.2 $42,450 Carroll County 20,747 73.9% 66.8% 79.4% 55.7 $34,366 Cass County 37,559 87.9% 76.4% 91.9% 91.1 $29,370 Clark County 127,479 96.0% 94.0% 97.2% 341.9 $36,386 Clay County 26,424 89.5% 84.0% 91.2% 73.9 $36,588 Clinton County 32,895 94.9% 80.8% 91.8% 81.2 $30,108 Crawford County 10,523 52.2% 38.8% 55.0% 34.4 $28,760 Daviess County 34,097 94.2% 79.6% 91.5% 79.4 $29,952 DeKalb County 44,330 100.0% 100.0% 94.5% 122.2 $34,026 Dearborn County 51,435 98.8% 98.1% 88.3% 168.6 $38,711 Decatur County 26,421 83.5% 61.1% 88.8% 70.9 $36,726 Delaware County 112,951 97.8% 90.7% 98.6% 288.1 $30,037 Dubois County 43,629 99.9% 99.6% 81.3% 102.1 $37,126 Elkhart County 207,436 98.6% 93.2% 99.3% 447.9 $31,850 Fayette County 23,335 90.7% 89.5% 83.4% 108.5 $29,274 Floyd County 81,931 97.7% 94.8% 98.2% 551.8 $40,196 Fountain County 16,833 97.4% 95.4% 80.8% 42.5 $31,232 Franklin County 23,136 89.7% 86.6% 55.0% 60.2 $38,014 Fulton County 20,004 99.7% 99.7% 83.8% 54.3 $32,867 Gibson County 33,038 93.3% 80.3% 89.5% 67.8 $33,358 Grant County 66,458 95.1% 89.0% 95.8% 160.5 $29,023 Greene County 31,219 76.6% 62.0% 73.6% 57.6 $32,807 Hamilton County 379,704 99.2% 97.9% 99.9% 962.8 $58,929 Hancock County 88,810 98.8% 97.8% 99.3% 290.3 $45,781 Harrison County 39,978 71.6% 53.8% 79.8% 82.6 $35,333 Hendricks County 190,629 99.1% 98.6% 98.6% 468.5 $44,903 Henry County 49,081 87.0% 83.3% 89.4% 125.2 $31,084 Howard County 84,082 98.0% 91.9% 98.1% 286.9 $34,785 Huntington County 36,944 98.2% 94.6% 94.8% 96.5 $34,479 Jackson County 47,420 97.9% 97.5% 86.6% 93.0 $33,127 Jasper County 33,387 78.9% 70.6% 87.9% 59.7 $36,426 Jay County 20,164 88.5% 59.8% 76.5% 52.5 $27,105 Jefferson County 32,921 83.2% 80.1% 76.2% 91.3 $32,420 Jennings County 27,634 90.5% 89.1% 77.3% 73.4 $31,077 Johnson County 170,611 98.9% 97.6% 97.7% 532.5 $42,884 Knox County 35,872 89.4% 81.6% 92.9% 69.5 $33,762 Kosciusko County 80,669 99.5% 94.5% 89.1% 151.8 $36,316 LaGrange County 41,122 100.0% 100.0% 90.4% 108.3 $32,928 LaPorte County 111,348 96.2% 91.9% 98.7% 186.1 $34,650 Lake County 502,955 99.0% 98.0% 99.9% 8.5 $35,973 Lawrence County 45,192 91.9% 90.3% 79.0% 100.6 $33,401 Madison County 134,222 97.4% 91.6% 99.0% 297.0 $33,425 Marion County 981,628 99.8% 99.2% 100.0% 475.0 $36,355 Marshall County 46,464 97.5% 82.9% 90.2% 104.7 $33,134 Martin County 9,864 75.0% 70.7% 68.2% 29.4 $32,250 Miami County 35,613 92.3% 66.1% 87.4% 95.3 $29,185 Monroe County 140,702 95.8% 95.4% 91.6% 356.6 $36,836 Montgomery County 38,633 99.0% 98.4% 83.8% 76.6 $34,462 Morgan County 73,825 96.9% 95.6% 90.0% 182.8 $39,777 Newton County 14,131 90.9% 86.3% 81.9% 35.2 $32,318 Noble County 47,811 98.4% 88.4% 88.7% 116.4 $33,516 Ohio County 5,996 99.1% 98.8% 58.9% 69.6 $36,210 Orange County 19,824 99.2% 99.2% 68.8% 49.8 $33,475 Owen County 21,851 87.3% 86.4% 43.1% 56.7 $33,451 Parke County 16,508 78.7% 71.9% 62.0% 37.1 $31,264 Perry County 19,320 95.7% 95.4% 76.6% 50.6 $30,366 Pike County 12,116 90.0% 86.6% 69.9% 36.2 $33,085 Porter County 175,860 97.9% 96.0% 99.8% 420.6 $42,814 Posey County 25,067 85.7% 68.6% 92.5% 61.2 $38,398 Pulaski County 12,421 68.0% 59.8% 67.3% 28.6 $31,336 Putnam County 37,804 82.8% 81.6% 77.3% 78.7 $34,050 Randolph County 24,337 89.4% 67.3% 81.8% 53.8 $31,036 Ripley County 29,214 96.2% 92.8% 65.2% 65.4 $34,364 Rush County 16,759 66.6% 55.7% 80.9% 41.1 $30,233 Scott County 24,751 90.8% 88.5% 77.8% 130.0 $29,123 Shelby County 45,654 79.8% 71.9% 94.6% 111.0 $35,637 Spencer County 20,192 97.3% 95.9% 79.5% 50.9 $36,718 St. Joseph County 273,744 98.9% 94.6% 99.5% 598.0 $35,714 Starke County 23,463 90.4% 78.3% 76.5% 75.9 $28,895 Steuben County 34,862 100.0% 100.0% 86.5% 112.9 $37,126 Sullivan County 20,768 65.2% 57.1% 80.5% 46.4 $29,424 Switzerland County 9,988 100.0% 99.8% 60.4% 45.3 $31,238 Tippecanoe County 191,650 99.3% 98.6% 97.7% 384.1 $32,271 Tipton County 15,324 86.6% 70.1% 95.1% 58.8 $37,924 Union County 6,884 93.3% 92.2% 70.2% 42.7 $37,356 Vanderburgh County 180,387 99.9% 99.5% 99.2% 772.9 $35,369 Vermillion County 15,516 84.6% 80.9% 71.2% 60.4 $30,418 Vigo County 106,166 94.3% 92.1% 96.5% 263.0 $30,829 Wabash County 30,777 94.5% 91.1% 85.6% 74.6 $33,907 Warren County 8,451 50.5% 45.6% 64.1% 23.2 $36,746 Warrick County 66,339 95.1% 88.9% 96.2% 172.4 $47,232 Washington County 28,345 97.1% 90.6% 65.9% 55.2 $29,451 Wayne County 66,410 93.5% 91.4% 91.2% 165.3 $31,990 Wells County 28,798 95.0% 83.2% 90.1% 78.2 $35,280 White County 24,833 98.5% 85.4% 79.2% 49.2 $33,178 Whitley County 34,885 98.0% 57.8% 91.8% 104.0 $37,540 Iowa 3,241,490 97.3% 92.4% 93.6% 58.0 $39,728 Adair County 7,431 94.3% 75.8% 75.2% 13.1 $39,526 Adams County 3,606 68.9% 57.3% 57.1% 8.5 $41,778 Allamakee County 14,184 98.4% 97.4% 65.8% 22.2 $34,692 Appanoose County 12,106 95.7% 81.4% 83.1% 24.3 $28,911 Audubon County 5,562 88.7% 73.2% 83.5% 12.6 $34,615 Benton County 25,799 90.7% 83.2% 92.8% 36.0 $40,995 Black Hawk County 132,348 100.0% 98.6% 99.4% 233.9 $37,409 Boone County 26,729 96.6% 85.6% 91.7% 46.9 $41,075 Bremer County 25,328 99.9% 96.7% 90.7% 58.2 $41,192 Buchanan County 20,733 99.8% 82.3% 92.6% 36.3 $37,392 Buena Vista County 20,816 97.5% 82.2% 95.0% 36.2 $33,083 Butler County 14,156 99.7% 96.2% 94.8% 24.4 $35,364 Calhoun County 9,711 92.0% 77.9% 77.3% 17.0 $36,086 Carroll County 20,407 98.2% 94.0% 77.6% 35.8 $37,672 Cass County 13,024 95.0% 92.0% 85.3% 23.1 $36,881 Cedar County 18,231 98.3% 93.0% 94.1% 31.5 $38,775 Cerro Gordo County 42,493 99.0% 96.9% 97.1% 74.8 $40,345 Cherokee County 11,658 97.0% 94.3% 78.7% 20.2 $37,174 Chickasaw County 11,719 92.4% 75.0% 88.5% 23.2 $37,093 Clarke County 9,524 87.6% 76.9% 81.6% 22.1 $35,360 Clay County 16,474 99.7% 98.0% 97.6% 29.0 $37,963 Clayton County 16,931 97.5% 93.9% 52.5% 21.7 $35,661 Clinton County 46,015 99.2% 94.4% 93.9% 66.2 $36,093 Crawford County 16,378 90.3% 78.2% 73.8% 22.9 $32,731 Dallas County 115,343 97.5% 93.6% 97.7% 196.1 $52,722 Davis County 9,193 99.6% 99.6% 71.8% 18.3 $33,836 Decatur County 7,656 99.7% 99.3% 72.2% 14.4 $27,508 Delaware County 17,609 97.3% 86.2% 84.5% 30.5 $40,940 Des Moines County 38,411 97.4% 94.1% 94.5% 92.3 $36,246 Dickinson County 18,158 100.0% 99.2% 96.8% 47.7 $47,165 Dubuque County 99,242 99.1% 97.4% 95.8% 163.1 $40,624 Emmet County 9,162 100.0% 96.0% 96.5% 23.1 $36,957 Fayette County 19,152 97.4% 91.3% 78.9% 26.2 $32,982 Floyd County 15,008 99.9% 87.6% 92.8% 30.0 $36,221 Franklin County 10,024 99.8% 72.8% 86.7% 17.2 $32,451 Fremont County 6,494 68.7% 55.7% 58.9% 12.7 $39,761 Greene County 8,662 96.8% 95.1% 89.1% 15.2 $36,237 Grundy County 12,405 99.9% 79.6% 97.1% 24.7 $39,565 Guthrie County 10,774 92.2% 87.3% 64.1% 18.2 $42,898 Hamilton County 14,856 99.3% 94.6% 91.5% 25.8 $38,075 Hancock County 10,616 99.4% 91.6% 95.5% 18.6 $36,756 Hardin County 16,464 98.9% 91.2% 93.8% 28.9 $33,765 Harrison County 14,626 86.7% 59.3% 86.8% 21.0 $39,369 Henry County 19,361 99.7% 81.8% 89.0% 44.6 $31,084 Howard County 9,360 94.0% 79.9% 78.8% 19.8 $33,190 Humboldt County 9,617 97.4% 80.1% 90.7% 22.1 $38,775 Ida County 6,810 94.7% 85.9% 71.7% 15.8 $35,471 Iowa County 16,423 96.1% 87.6% 89.0% 28.0 $39,363 Jackson County 19,390 99.4% 95.2% 75.5% 30.5 $38,325 Jasper County 38,107 91.6% 83.3% 89.3% 52.2 $37,380 Jefferson County 15,781 95.7% 81.8% 90.7% 36.2 $35,800 Johnson County 160,080 98.4% 96.3% 98.3% 261.1 $44,699 Jones County 21,116 98.0% 92.7% 85.9% 36.7 $35,376 Keokuk County 9,855 93.8% 72.1% 88.1% 17.0 $33,181 Kossuth County 14,408 99.7% 83.8% 89.1% 14.8 $37,180 Lee County 32,376 80.9% 75.4% 89.3% 62.6 $32,537 Linn County 231,762 98.8% 95.8% 99.0% 323.2 $42,497 Louisa County 10,630 83.7% 66.5% 90.2% 26.5 $35,747 Lucas County 8,758 75.4% 61.5% 74.0% 20.3 $32,962 Lyon County 12,378 99.2% 99.0% 81.3% 21.1 $33,727 Madison County 17,161 87.8% 73.0% 89.1% 30.6 $41,878 Mahaska County 22,034 90.1% 78.1% 91.8% 38.6 $35,035 Marion County 34,048 91.5% 76.4% 88.9% 61.4 $40,540 Marshall County 40,392 98.8% 97.1% 95.3% 70.6 $32,737 Mills County 14,717 99.8% 99.4% 78.9% 33.6 $43,081 Mitchell County 10,632 99.8% 86.2% 88.9% 22.7 $38,824 Monona County 8,429 86.5% 68.6% 81.2% 12.1 $34,565 Monroe County 7,373 71.9% 61.4% 76.0% 17.0 $35,430 Montgomery County 10,063 99.9% 99.8% 67.8% 23.7 $37,388 Muscatine County 42,132 95.2% 86.6% 95.3% 96.3 $35,228 O'Brien County 14,260 97.0% 96.4% 96.4% 24.9 $34,346 Osceola County 6,036 98.8% 82.7% 92.3% 15.1 $37,142 Page County 15,038 96.9% 96.6% 81.7% 28.1 $32,567 Palo Alto County 8,809 96.3% 83.7% 90.7% 15.6 $35,518 Plymouth County 25,825 99.4% 99.1% 89.3% 29.9 $42,241 Pocahontas County 7,006 95.2% 72.0% 75.3% 12.1 $35,956 Polk County 516,185 99.3% 98.1% 99.8% 902.1 $44,008 Pottawattamie County 93,529 96.3% 93.5% 97.7% 98.3 $36,853 Poweshiek County 18,454 93.0% 85.3% 92.2% 31.5 $37,173 Ringgold County 4,608 93.6% 56.2% 52.0% 8.6 $37,108 Sac County 9,533 97.3% 92.3% 88.5% 16.6 $40,261 Scott County 175,601 99.3% 98.4% 98.6% 383.3 $42,754 Shelby County 11,821 95.7% 91.9% 77.7% 20.0 $38,805 Sioux County 36,554 100.0% 99.9% 96.0% 47.6 $36,175 Story County 102,500 98.6% 92.0% 98.6% 179.0 $37,933 Tama County 16,738 97.4% 74.2% 91.5% 23.2 $34,094 Taylor County 5,825 95.2% 81.0% 57.5% 11.0 $35,070 Union County 11,955 94.7% 81.9% 88.7% 28.2 $31,843 Van Buren County 7,217 88.0% 88.0% 72.7% 14.9 $31,538 Wapello County 35,681 98.6% 98.3% 93.7% 82.6 $33,337 Warren County 56,343 91.8% 81.4% 93.7% 98.9 $43,239 Washington County 22,631 97.7% 88.2% 91.2% 39.8 $37,686 Wayne County 6,622 86.6% 78.7% 55.9% 12.6 $34,623 Webster County 36,909 99.9% 95.6% 86.4% 51.6 $35,172 Winnebago County 10,383 100.0% 100.0% 98.5% 25.9 $36,877 Winneshiek County 19,723 95.7% 82.8% 68.7% 28.6 $40,595 Woodbury County 107,257 98.7% 97.3% 97.8% 122.9 $34,330 Worth County 7,307 100.0% 100.0% 96.9% 18.3 $38,232 Wright County 12,729 97.3% 82.3% 96.6% 21.9 $37,066 Kansas 2,970,589 96.7% 91.2% 95.8% 36.3 $39,638 Allen County 12,425 84.1% 80.0% 90.1% 24.8 $29,176 Anderson County 7,908 64.7% 58.0% 81.0% 13.6 $30,213 Atchison County 16,249 95.3% 81.6% 96.1% 37.7 $29,910 Barber County 4,070 96.8% 93.6% 91.0% 3.6 $34,620 Barton County 24,835 97.8% 92.0% 94.7% 27.7 $31,835 Bourbon County 14,424 89.7% 77.7% 88.4% 22.7 $31,717 Brown County 9,142 92.3% 70.3% 87.7% 16.0 $31,355 Butler County 69,158 99.4% 86.2% 97.0% 48.4 $37,381 Chase County 2,507 62.5% 59.6% 60.1% 3.2 $31,554 Chautauqua County 3,339 53.2% 23.5% 84.7% 5.2 $30,782 Cherokee County 19,133 92.2% 69.2% 93.4% 32.6 $30,180 Cheyenne County 2,646 58.8% 52.8% 39.8% 2.6 $32,883 Clark County 1,873 96.7% 90.1% 94.0% 1.9 $35,022 Clay County 7,969 94.6% 89.3% 85.8% 12.3 $35,913 Cloud County 8,723 99.3% 93.0% 86.3% 12.2 $29,325 Coffey County 8,301 80.0% 66.8% 80.2% 13.2 $37,275 Comanche County 1,694 75.7% 71.7% 54.7% 2.1 $31,710 Cowley County 34,186 98.7% 82.1% 92.9% 30.4 $31,072 Crawford County 38,904 97.7% 96.9% 95.2% 66.0 $29,188 Decatur County 2,716 96.5% 96.2% 74.6% 3.0 $36,280 Dickinson County 18,621 94.2% 87.7% 91.8% 22.0 $36,242 Doniphan County 7,575 93.8% 73.7% 90.3% 19.3 $33,462 Douglas County 121,989 94.3% 87.7% 97.7% 267.7 $39,321 Edwards County 2,731 82.3% 72.2% 79.9% 4.4 $32,481 Elk County 2,436 78.8% 57.9% 45.6% 3.8 $29,323 Ellis County 29,007 99.8% 99.8% 95.4% 32.2 $37,575 Ellsworth County 6,316 95.4% 87.9% 88.6% 8.8 $33,604 Finney County 38,354 98.5% 93.3% 98.9% 29.5 $31,556 Ford County 34,072 99.2% 90.9% 97.8% 31.0 $28,834 Franklin County 26,273 87.8% 73.9% 89.5% 46.0 $34,403 Geary County 35,459 96.1% 94.1% 96.8% 92.2 $27,532 Gove County 2,658 97.4% 97.4% 39.2% 2.5 $35,590 Graham County 2,370 100.0% 100.0% 84.9% 2.6 $33,129 Grant County 7,097 89.6% 86.3% 93.6% 12.3 $39,635 Gray County 5,730 99.5% 99.3% 86.2% 6.6 $35,990 Greeley County 1,152 78.2% 68.8% 96.5% 1.5 $37,662 Greenwood County 5,871 89.7% 74.1% 75.3% 5.1 $35,792 Hamilton County 2,488 86.7% 84.5% 95.5% 2.5 $29,409 Harper County 5,413 99.9% 92.8% 93.6% 6.8 $28,555 Harvey County 33,642 100.0% 88.0% 97.1% 62.3 $34,973 Haskell County 3,591 90.3% 89.5% 67.8% 6.2 $32,616 Hodgeman County 1,673 89.8% 73.9% 55.6% 1.9 $36,823 Jackson County 13,525 79.9% 48.2% 82.2% 20.6 $34,051 Jefferson County 18,332 84.2% 39.9% 84.3% 34.4 $39,516 Jewell County 2,899 96.9% 87.2% 36.9% 3.2 $32,993 Johnson County 632,276 99.7% 99.0% 99.6% 335.0 $58,292 Kearny County 3,808 83.1% 80.3% 95.4% 4.4 $31,556 Kingman County 6,946 96.0% 66.6% 84.8% 8.0 $32,969 Kiowa County 2,436 84.8% 81.2% 65.9% 3.4 $38,482 Labette County 19,692 82.5% 64.0% 92.6% 30.5 $29,602 Lane County 1,482 99.7% 99.7% 80.4% 2.1 $39,322 Leavenworth County 84,670 100.0% 100.0% 96.6% 182.7 $38,843 Lincoln County 2,928 82.3% 70.0% 69.9% 4.1 $32,595 Linn County 9,841 87.1% 68.1% 69.6% 16.6 $36,213 Logan County 2,694 87.0% 86.8% 89.9% 2.5 $40,940 Lyon County 32,520 95.6% 87.4% 95.0% 38.4 $29,881 Marion County 11,670 87.0% 78.4% 86.9% 12.4 $35,423 Marshall County 9,950 85.5% 72.0% 84.4% 11.1 $36,220 McPherson County 30,334 94.7% 88.0% 97.3% 33.8 $35,857 Meade County 3,892 91.5% 77.8% 77.1% 4.0 $44,359 Miami County 35,737 85.7% 72.8% 91.6% 62.1 $41,736 Mitchell County 5,803 99.4% 91.2% 84.1% 8.3 $36,913 Montgomery County 30,459 93.8% 77.6% 97.9% 47.3 $28,959 Morris County 5,279 97.9% 95.2% 79.1% 7.6 $36,341 Morton County 2,485 92.4% 91.7% 95.8% 3.4 $29,023 Nemaha County 10,062 87.1% 74.6% 78.6% 14.0 $38,996 Neosho County 15,552 84.5% 73.2% 88.3% 27.2 $30,510 Ness County 2,617 100.0% 100.0% 68.2% 2.4 $45,430 Norton County 5,335 83.6% 83.1% 68.5% 6.1 $26,220 Osage County 15,737 80.9% 55.8% 86.8% 22.3 $33,617 Osborne County 3,353 100.0% 100.0% 84.6% 3.8 $36,655 Ottawa County 5,853 86.5% 57.7% 81.4% 8.1 $36,223 Pawnee County 6,012 99.7% 98.9% 84.0% 8.0 $39,318 Phillips County 4,733 90.2% 83.5% 65.0% 5.3 $34,887 Pottawatomie County 26,876 99.4% 98.0% 88.9% 32.0 $37,341 Pratt County 9,137 97.2% 90.6% 93.5% 12.4 $33,584 Rawlins County 2,432 58.8% 57.7% 25.4% 2.3 $34,231 Reno County 61,417 97.6% 89.1% 95.4% 48.9 $32,203 Republic County 4,613 93.0% 77.4% 77.2% 6.4 $30,465 Rice County 9,284 95.8% 86.0% 90.2% 12.8 $32,742 Riley County 72,557 98.4% 98.1% 97.1% 119.0 $34,583 Rooks County 4,748 90.9% 87.4% 90.6% 5.3 $34,675 Rush County 2,810 98.1% 97.0% 54.0% 3.9 $45,168 Russell County 6,620 100.0% 99.9% 82.4% 7.5 $32,255 Saline County 53,459 99.0% 95.9% 97.7% 74.2 $34,403 Scott County 4,914 85.3% 85.3% 95.4% 6.8 $35,206 Sedgwick County 536,079 99.4% 96.3% 99.8% 537.7 $36,699 Seward County 21,276 98.7% 96.6% 99.3% 33.3 $29,053 Shawnee County 177,942 98.0% 90.9% 98.6% 327.1 $37,072 Sheridan County 2,397 86.3% 83.5% 84.3% 2.7 $44,743 Sherman County 5,796 87.2% 85.5% 93.6% 5.5 $46,410 Smith County 3,541 92.8% 92.7% 54.2% 4.0 $35,983 Stafford County 3,901 90.7% 70.1% 31.8% 4.9 $34,864 Stanton County 2,071 74.6% 73.6% 79.8% 3.0 $35,970 Stevens County 5,035 82.2% 81.5% 91.8% 6.9 $31,270 Sumner County 22,336 98.0% 84.9% 91.6% 18.9 $32,318 Thomas County 7,787 92.9% 91.3% 92.0% 7.2 $39,637 Trego County 2,774 100.0% 100.0% 62.7% 3.1 $43,336 Wabaunsee County 7,112 91.2% 61.5% 85.9% 9.0 $33,885 Wallace County 1,472 69.2% 64.8% 80.0% 1.6 $35,831 Washington County 5,572 81.1% 37.6% 86.4% 6.2 $34,654 Wichita County 2,072 72.9% 72.4% 79.9% 2.9 $35,838 Wilson County 8,398 87.4% 58.6% 92.5% 14.7 $32,771 Woodson County 3,111 48.1% 41.6% 66.8% 6.2 $29,024 Wyandotte County 169,418 99.3% 98.7% 99.9% 117.3 $28,523 Kentucky 4,588,372 92.8% 91.2% 85.8% 116.2 $34,960 Adair County 19,239 75.6% 72.7% 65.2% 47.5 $27,705 Allen County 22,037 99.2% 99.2% 62.1% 64.0 $30,206 Anderson County 24,883 74.2% 72.6% 83.8% 123.1 $35,161 Ballard County 7,626 100.0% 100.0% 68.7% 30.9 $34,469 Barren County 45,609 96.7% 95.6% 76.1% 93.5 $28,422 Bath County 12,951 81.6% 78.5% 67.4% 46.5 $28,809 Bell County 23,051 93.7% 93.2% 56.7% 64.2 $20,463 Boone County 144,135 99.9% 99.8% 98.8% 585.2 $43,436 Bourbon County 20,333 82.9% 78.3% 93.8% 70.2 $32,619 Boyd County 47,777 97.3% 97.1% 91.6% 298.9 $31,192 Boyle County 31,394 81.2% 80.0% 94.3% 174.1 $32,238 Bracken County 8,497 66.5% 52.0% 82.2% 41.9 $30,198 Breathitt County 12,804 74.3% 74.3% 48.2% 26.0 $23,544 Breckinridge County 21,221 86.4% 85.7% 74.5% 37.2 $29,163 Bullitt County 85,802 95.8% 95.1% 94.0% 288.8 $36,758 Butler County 12,551 98.3% 97.9% 65.9% 29.5 $25,198 Caldwell County 12,611 73.5% 70.5% 80.3% 36.6 $31,544 Calloway County 38,975 93.4% 92.3% 81.3% 101.2 $29,862 Campbell County 94,008 99.3% 99.0% 98.4% 621.2 $45,113 Carlisle County 4,777 85.6% 85.6% 61.2% 25.2 $33,860 Carroll County 11,111 84.9% 80.5% 82.6% 86.3 $29,904 Carter County 26,098 69.6% 66.6% 65.8% 63.7 $27,184 Casey County 15,948 61.8% 61.2% 42.0% 35.9 $23,916 Christian County 71,006 98.3% 98.0% 93.2% 99.0 $26,445 Clark County 37,673 92.8% 91.4% 94.6% 149.2 $39,131 Clay County 19,592 91.6% 91.4% 20.6% 41.7 $21,888 Clinton County 9,183 68.6% 63.2% 64.6% 46.6 $23,829 Crittenden County 8,982 50.8% 45.8% 67.4% 25.0 $28,751 Cumberland County 6,047 76.3% 75.8% 42.7% 19.8 $21,857 Daviess County 104,457 99.9% 99.4% 95.8% 227.9 $35,121 Edmonson County 12,635 84.6% 80.7% 61.0% 41.7 $27,643 Elliott County 7,263 100.0% 100.0% 30.1% 31.0 $18,287 Estill County 14,002 82.0% 81.6% 77.7% 55.3 $24,142 Fayette County 329,437 99.0% 98.3% 99.9% 161.5 $42,272 Fleming County 15,591 64.5% 62.1% 72.4% 44.7 $26,611 Floyd County 34,532 98.1% 98.1% 54.4% 87.8 $26,142 Franklin County 52,442 90.9% 88.6% 90.7% 252.3 $40,031 Fulton County 6,282 95.9% 93.7% 85.1% 30.5 $20,202 Gallatin County 8,805 95.7% 91.9% 93.5% 89.5 $30,216 Garrard County 18,040 83.2% 64.4% 77.2% 78.4 $30,619 Grant County 25,722 97.4% 96.5% 84.8% 99.7 $30,603 Graves County 36,821 99.7% 99.6% 85.1% 66.7 $29,608 Grayson County 27,070 92.2% 90.9% 71.7% 54.1 $27,601 Green County 11,552 69.5% 66.1% 51.6% 40.4 $24,639 Greenup County 35,273 85.3% 84.7% 81.5% 102.4 $32,864 Hancock County 9,013 98.7% 98.7% 61.8% 48.0 $31,417 Hardin County 112,826 94.3% 93.2% 93.5% 181.0 $36,836 Harlan County 25,052 94.1% 93.8% 53.3% 53.8 $21,681 Harrison County 19,525 52.4% 44.1% 85.4% 63.7 $31,696 Hart County 19,923 89.4% 87.5% 59.6% 48.3 $25,506 Henderson County 44,175 99.7% 98.7% 95.3% 101.2 $32,803 Henry County 16,198 67.6% 59.2% 80.5% 56.6 $30,492 Hickman County 4,393 99.4% 99.1% 75.6% 18.1 $30,587 Hopkins County 45,218 93.1% 81.5% 88.5% 83.4 $28,979 Jackson County 13,358 100.0% 100.0% 62.2% 38.7 $22,069 Jefferson County 793,881 99.9% 99.2% 99.8% 84.8 $41,267 Jessamine County 56,495 93.5% 89.6% 96.2% 328.1 $40,444 Johnson County 22,098 99.0% 99.0% 62.9% 84.4 $24,579 Kenton County 174,862 99.7% 99.6% 99.1% 90.9 $42,623 Knott County 13,438 100.0% 100.0% 32.1% 38.2 $21,353 Knox County 29,657 90.5% 87.5% 65.6% 76.8 $21,277 Larue County 15,128 69.3% 69.0% 78.0% 57.8 $30,533 Laurel County 63,353 94.8% 92.7% 70.6% 146.0 $27,944 Lawrence County 15,798 99.6% 99.4% 46.7% 38.0 $24,027 Lee County 7,313 70.3% 55.7% 70.1% 35.0 $19,697 Leslie County 9,729 59.5% 59.1% 6.0% 24.3 $22,942 Letcher County 20,139 97.8% 97.8% 45.9% 59.6 $24,260 Lewis County 12,875 63.5% 60.3% 58.9% 26.7 $23,486 Lincoln County 24,910 82.4% 74.5% 79.6% 74.8 $27,267 Livingston County 8,815 61.2% 56.7% 69.8% 28.1 $29,831 Logan County 28,467 99.9% 99.9% 79.7% 51.6 $29,251 Lyon County 9,078 57.0% 45.9% 75.1% 42.5 $32,837 Madison County 99,582 96.3% 93.2% 92.5% 227.7 $32,382 Magoffin County 11,118 100.0% 100.0% 39.0% 36.0 $20,024 Marion County 19,851 78.7% 74.5% 77.7% 57.9 $27,866 Marshall County 31,734 89.3% 86.1% 78.3% 105.0 $33,532 Martin County 10,696 73.2% 73.2% 39.5% 46.6 $29,000 Mason County 16,956 90.1% 87.0% 91.6% 70.6 $33,031 McCracken County 67,550 98.9% 98.5% 94.9% 271.6 $38,598 McCreary County 16,824 99.9% 99.9% 52.8% 39.4 $16,972 McLean County 9,126 73.0% 65.8% 71.1% 36.1 $34,206 Meade County 30,442 99.9% 99.9% 81.2% 99.7 $35,010 Menifee County 6,341 100.0% 100.0% 50.3% 31.1 $25,987 Mercer County 23,515 72.4% 67.9% 90.4% 94.4 $32,851 Metcalfe County 10,558 77.3% 76.9% 60.4% 36.5 $24,031 Monroe County 11,163 76.4% 73.6% 45.4% 33.9 $26,755 Montgomery County 28,771 86.8% 86.0% 88.5% 145.8 $28,562 Morgan County 14,300 100.0% 100.0% 53.2% 37.5 $25,456 Muhlenberg County 30,512 85.8% 82.3% 76.9% 65.3 $31,065 Nelson County 48,706 67.9% 57.0% 88.1% 116.7 $33,257 Nicholas County 7,816 40.0% 35.0% 80.1% 40.0 $24,672 Ohio County 23,933 77.0% 73.7% 75.7% 40.8 $27,179 Oldham County 70,525 97.3% 96.8% 96.6% 376.6 $52,773 Owen County 11,435 48.5% 48.4% 62.8% 32.6 $30,071 Owsley County 3,928 99.2% 99.2% 47.1% 19.9 $21,285 Pendleton County 14,844 93.7% 92.5% 71.2% 53.6 $30,460 Perry County 26,739 93.6% 93.5% 50.3% 78.7 $30,062 Pike County 55,430 95.4% 95.3% 35.4% 70.5 $26,111 Powell County 12,928 76.6% 76.1% 86.2% 72.2 $23,947 Pulaski County 66,842 83.3% 82.2% 84.0% 101.5 $31,140 Robertson County 2,382 10.6% 9.6% 63.9% 23.8 $24,243 Rockcastle County 16,226 68.8% 66.8% 69.1% 51.3 $28,133 Rowan County 24,675 89.6% 89.1% 66.0% 88.2 $30,257 Russell County 18,458 99.7% 99.7% 61.3% 72.8 $28,231 Scott County 61,700 98.6% 98.0% 92.9% 219.0 $40,096 Shelby County 50,124 78.9% 74.1% 90.5% 132.0 $38,834 Simpson County 20,350 99.1% 98.9% 91.7% 86.9 $28,786 Spencer County 20,823 76.1% 72.2% 67.8% 111.5 $40,963 Taylor County 26,809 79.0% 76.3% 79.4% 100.6 $28,714 Todd County 12,757 99.1% 99.0% 71.2% 34.1 $29,483 Trigg County 14,559 85.1% 82.1% 63.9% 33.0 $31,732 Trimble County 8,591 70.3% 65.8% 76.5% 56.7 $31,542 Union County 13,178 95.2% 93.5% 85.7% 38.4 $30,328 Warren County 147,936 97.2% 96.0% 92.9% 273.1 $34,999 Washington County 12,269 86.1% 83.2% 75.6% 41.3 $30,810 Wayne County 19,629 80.1% 78.3% 56.2% 42.8 $27,424 Webster County 12,854 76.8% 57.2% 72.0% 38.7 $27,404 Whitley County 37,233 91.9% 90.3% 66.8% 85.0 $23,077 Wolfe County 6,364 100.0% 100.0% 61.4% 28.6 $15,253 Woodford County 27,728 83.4% 81.3% 95.3% 145.9 $42,152 Louisiana 4,597,725 91.7% 89.5% 94.8% 106.4 $34,211 Acadia Parish 56,604 92.3% 88.8% 94.4% 86.4 $26,103 Allen Parish 22,501 80.6% 79.1% 83.4% 29.5 $24,402 Ascension Parish 133,534 99.5% 99.5% 99.5% 460.5 $41,453 Assumption Parish 20,050 97.9% 97.6% 87.7% 58.3 $30,471 Avoyelles Parish 38,373 82.2% 79.2% 75.1% 46.1 $23,854 Beauregard Parish 36,695 42.9% 37.5% 72.2% 31.7 $33,294 Bienville Parish 12,412 39.4% 33.7% 50.5% 15.3 $25,567 Bossier Parish 131,102 92.5% 88.6% 95.0% 156.2 $36,233 Caddo Parish 224,893 97.2% 96.3% 97.0% 255.7 $33,008 Calcasieu Parish 206,861 92.0% 90.4% 97.5% 194.4 $35,568 Caldwell Parish 9,393 51.2% 50.5% 71.6% 17.7 $29,643 Cameron Parish 4,678 80.3% 71.1% 86.4% 3.6 $33,846 Catahoula Parish 8,280 39.6% 29.4% 70.7% 11.7 $22,927 Claiborne Parish 13,537 46.1% 37.5% 57.9% 17.9 $19,675 Concordia Parish 17,797 86.8% 83.9% 89.4% 25.5 $23,119 De Soto Parish 27,274 69.2% 64.0% 74.6% 31.1 $29,925 East Baton Rouge Parish 453,022 96.9% 94.4% 99.1% 994.6 $38,131 East Carroll Parish 6,892 84.0% 84.0% 93.1% 16.4 $16,689 East Feliciana Parish 19,112 32.1% 26.9% 70.3% 42.2 $34,994 Evangeline Parish 31,745 81.9% 76.4% 89.3% 47.9 $24,765 Franklin Parish 19,107 83.6% 79.5% 86.3% 30.6 $25,511 Grant Parish 22,109 28.9% 19.7% 74.3% 34.4 $26,307 Iberia Parish 67,540 92.0% 90.1% 99.0% 117.7 $29,664 Iberville Parish 29,766 92.4% 91.6% 91.6% 48.1 $29,293 Jackson Parish 14,797 49.7% 44.8% 67.5% 26.0 $24,255 Jefferson Davis Parish 31,436 86.7% 66.2% 90.8% 48.3 $30,377 Jefferson Parish 427,252 99.0% 98.1% 100.0% 419.7 $37,062 LaSalle Parish 14,702 74.9% 74.2% 79.4% 23.5 $31,297 Lafayette Parish 254,241 96.9% 96.3% 99.6% 945.7 $39,092 Lafourche Parish 95,342 99.4% 99.1% 99.2% 89.3 $32,900 Lincoln Parish 48,243 83.0% 77.1% 87.4% 102.3 $25,193 Livingston Parish 152,886 96.7% 96.0% 94.3% 235.9 $33,883 Madison Parish 9,093 92.3% 83.2% 92.3% 14.6 $19,086 Morehouse Parish 23,787 93.1% 92.7% 88.1% 29.9 $24,038 Natchitoches Parish 35,982 76.0% 73.1% 72.3% 28.7 $26,602 Orleans Parish 362,701 98.8% 96.6% 100.0% 140.0 $39,698 Ouachita Parish 157,874 94.4% 92.9% 95.2% 258.7 $30,656 Plaquemines Parish 22,289 81.1% 68.5% 99.8% 28.6 $36,570 Pointe Coupee Parish 19,845 85.1% 83.4% 94.0% 35.6 $32,852 Rapides Parish 125,899 85.7% 84.0% 90.6% 95.3 $31,688 Red River Parish 7,238 29.1% 22.2% 47.0% 18.6 $25,081 Richland Parish 19,643 82.1% 69.7% 82.7% 35.4 $26,762 Sabine Parish 21,746 51.4% 46.9% 53.2% 25.1 $27,968 St. Bernard Parish 44,783 91.7% 85.2% 100.0% 118.6 $29,478 St. Charles Parish 50,400 97.9% 97.6% 99.7% 181.5 $39,716 St. Helena Parish 10,857 48.5% 48.3% 63.7% 26.6 $24,848 St. James Parish 19,110 99.0% 98.4% 99.9% 80.3 $35,832 St. John the Baptist Parish 39,694 100.0% 100.0% 99.6% 185.1 $30,337 St. Landry Parish 80,869 89.3% 86.8% 95.0% 87.5 $25,018 St. Martin Parish 51,218 87.8% 85.2% 95.3% 69.5 $29,983 St. Mary Parish 46,799 91.1% 89.8% 99.1% 84.2 $28,157 St. Tammany Parish 277,601 98.3% 97.5% 99.1% 328.4 $41,854 Tangipahoa Parish 139,823 96.9% 96.2% 96.8% 176.7 $30,992 Tensas Parish 3,844 90.0% 42.1% 42.2% 6.4 $21,878 Terrebonne Parish 103,864 99.8% 99.7% 99.2% 84.5 $33,217 Union Parish 20,617 37.9% 29.4% 63.9% 23.5 $27,835 Vermilion Parish 57,641 81.6% 76.7% 97.0% 49.1 $29,760 Vernon Parish 45,819 89.0% 88.2% 81.7% 34.5 $29,550 Washington Parish 45,090 83.0% 76.5% 90.9% 67.3 $25,520 Webster Parish 35,184 83.9% 80.3% 80.8% 59.3 $24,115 West Baton Rouge Parish 28,425 93.9% 88.3% 99.4% 147.8 $38,107 West Carroll Parish 9,254 99.0% 80.1% 73.4% 25.7 $28,876 West Feliciana Parish 15,155 17.9% 12.5% 86.6% 37.6 $29,175 Winn Parish 13,405 36.1% 33.8% 65.7% 14.1 $27,165 Maine 1,405,012 94.8% 94.1% 75.1% 45.6 $42,035 Androscoggin County 115,272 98.8% 98.3% 86.1% 246.3 $35,885 Aroostook County 66,776 82.5% 81.2% 73.0% 10.0 $33,136 Cumberland County 313,809 99.0% 98.5% 83.9% 375.3 $54,238 Franklin County 30,902 88.0% 87.7% 68.4% 18.2 $34,456 Hancock County 56,946 93.6% 92.9% 65.9% 35.9 $41,576 Kennebec County 128,461 97.5% 96.7% 75.6% 148.1 $37,344 Knox County 40,981 96.0% 95.1% 62.8% 112.2 $42,729 Lincoln County 36,491 97.0% 96.8% 36.4% 80.0 $44,739 Oxford County 60,039 89.2% 88.4% 64.1% 28.9 $33,545 Penobscot County 156,840 93.2% 91.4% 78.2% 46.2 $36,736 Piscataquis County 17,432 89.4% 89.1% 47.6% 4.4 $34,592 Sagadahoc County 37,582 99.0% 98.8% 70.8% 148.0 $45,131 Somerset County 51,338 95.6% 95.4% 68.1% 13.1 $32,452 Waldo County 40,617 72.4% 69.6% 59.4% 55.6 $38,183 Washington County 31,383 76.8% 75.5% 52.3% 12.2 $32,459 York County 220,143 98.5% 98.4% 80.4% 222.1 $44,548 Maryland 6,263,220 98.8% 98.4% 97.4% 644.9 $51,689 Allegany County 67,097 94.9% 88.3% 93.5% 158.9 $30,046 Anne Arundel County 602,350 99.9% 99.9% 98.6% 452.1 $58,462 Baltimore County 852,425 99.3% 99.1% 98.7% 424.6 $48,196 Baltimore city 568,271 99.8% 99.1% 100.0% 20.4 $39,195 Calvert County 94,913 99.3% 99.0% 86.7% 445.2 $56,411 Caroline County 34,248 99.1% 98.5% 85.8% 107.2 $33,898 Carroll County 177,108 94.2% 92.2% 96.0% 395.7 $51,465 Cecil County 106,305 98.6% 97.9% 96.4% 307.0 $42,560 Charles County 174,478 98.6% 98.2% 91.6% 381.1 $50,540 Dorchester County 33,138 89.3% 87.3% 84.1% 61.3 $34,780 Frederick County 299,317 96.0% 94.9% 97.4% 453.1 $53,316 Garrett County 28,393 81.0% 73.8% 80.7% 43.7 $42,328 Harford County 265,514 98.6% 98.2% 98.3% 607.4 $50,861 Howard County 339,668 99.8% 99.8% 98.5% 353.5 $65,860 Kent County 19,557 97.2% 96.1% 73.4% 70.6 $45,817 Montgomery County 1,082,273 99.9% 99.9% 99.1% 194.8 $66,124 Prince George's County 966,629 99.7% 99.6% 99.6% 2.8 $45,287 Queen Anne's County 53,688 98.1% 97.4% 85.0% 144.4 $54,824 Somerset County 25,241 94.8% 94.1% 72.9% 78.9 $26,031 St. Mary's County 116,469 98.1% 97.5% 89.5% 324.8 $51,358 Talbot County 38,244 98.9% 98.6% 82.7% 142.4 $53,527 Washington County 157,228 94.9% 92.4% 97.3% 343.5 $37,391 Wicomico County 106,329 98.3% 97.7% 95.0% 284.0 $36,856 Worcester County 54,337 96.9% 96.1% 89.8% 116.0 $51,620 Massachusetts 7,136,171 99.7% 99.6% 96.3% 914.8 $56,284 Barnstable County 232,570 99.5% 99.5% 96.2% 589.9 $60,325 Berkshire County 128,726 97.9% 97.5% 86.2% 138.9 $47,668 Bristol County 588,593 99.8% 99.7% 96.1% 64.1 $43,752 Dukes County 21,061 98.7% 98.7% 79.3% 204.1 $71,014 Essex County 823,938 100.0% 100.0% 98.1% 672.9 $53,210 Franklin County 70,871 98.3% 98.1% 77.3% 101.4 $41,366 Hampden County 464,151 99.5% 99.4% 96.0% 752.3 $37,810 Hampshire County 165,399 99.6% 99.0% 92.0% 313.7 $45,006 Middlesex County 1,668,956 99.9% 99.9% 97.8% 40.6 $67,471 Nantucket County 14,670 99.7% 99.6% 78.3% 317.6 $72,733 Norfolk County 740,754 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% 870.1 $69,508 Plymouth County 542,090 99.9% 99.8% 95.6% 823.2 $55,965 Suffolk County 793,144 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 615.3 $56,920 Worcester County 881,248 99.1% 98.7% 93.2% 583.3 $47,780 Michigan 10,140,459 95.7% 92.3% 94.9% 179.1 $39,538 Alcona County 10,624 50.7% 45.9% 61.5% 15.7 $34,595 Alger County 8,695 76.9% 76.9% 52.0% 9.5 $28,250 Allegan County 122,429 90.2% 87.4% 86.7% 148.4 $37,565 Alpena County 28,903 99.9% 86.2% 86.0% 50.5 $33,093 Antrim County 24,536 87.6% 85.3% 74.6% 51.6 $41,548 Arenac County 15,087 64.8% 54.7% 67.7% 41.5 $31,061 Baraga County 8,169 81.8% 79.1% 54.2% 9.1 $28,904 Barry County 64,025 84.9% 63.5% 79.7% 115.8 $39,955 Bay County 102,651 96.4% 88.0% 97.4% 232.0 $34,858 Benzie County 18,520 87.0% 85.8% 78.2% 57.9 $40,984 Berrien County 152,703 98.2% 95.6% 97.4% 268.9 $37,747 Branch County 46,187 87.1% 67.4% 83.6% 91.2 $30,685 Calhoun County 133,785 90.1% 76.3% 96.0% 189.4 $33,239 Cass County 51,550 98.5% 97.8% 79.7% 105.2 $38,544 Charlevoix County 26,105 94.1% 93.1% 82.9% 62.7 $47,337 Cheboygan County 25,964 93.9% 92.9% 75.9% 36.3 $34,750 Chippewa County 36,253 63.9% 62.8% 77.7% 23.3 $30,609 Clare County 31,405 75.9% 65.3% 70.2% 55.6 $27,619 Clinton County 80,050 87.2% 81.9% 96.2% 141.3 $44,380 Crawford County 13,599 83.4% 82.1% 77.4% 24.4 $31,449 Delta County 36,687 92.5% 91.1% 77.2% 31.3 $34,716 Dickinson County 25,995 88.5% 87.2% 91.4% 34.2 $36,181 Eaton County 109,494 94.9% 88.2% 97.1% 190.4 $40,259 Emmet County 33,949 94.0% 92.3% 78.8% 72.6 $45,122 Genesee County 402,279 97.9% 97.2% 98.8% 631.6 $34,587 Gladwin County 25,995 71.3% 60.3% 62.7% 51.8 $32,413 Gogebic County 14,217 81.1% 78.6% 88.9% 12.9 $34,085 Grand Traverse County 96,625 92.7% 90.6% 89.2% 208.1 $43,501 Gratiot County 41,372 95.4% 72.3% 90.6% 72.8 $29,558 Hillsdale County 45,590 92.1% 62.1% 85.4% 76.2 $31,996 Houghton County 38,041 83.8% 80.0% 85.5% 37.7 $31,441 Huron County 30,780 97.7% 82.3% 71.6% 36.8 $33,855 Ingham County 290,427 98.5% 93.5% 99.2% 522.3 $37,347 Ionia County 66,250 88.7% 70.1% 95.8% 116.0 $31,593 Iosco County 25,361 79.1% 76.1% 75.5% 46.2 $29,934 Iron County 11,709 60.2% 57.2% 72.1% 10.0 $33,488 Isabella County 65,072 97.0% 86.9% 87.6% 113.6 $29,626 Jackson County 160,233 91.4% 76.5% 92.3% 228.3 $34,834 Kalamazoo County 264,780 98.2% 95.5% 99.4% 471.2 $39,915 Kalkaska County 18,618 57.6% 51.9% 71.1% 33.3 $32,904 Kent County 673,002 97.8% 96.2% 99.1% 792.8 $41,504 Keweenaw County 2,161 49.1% 48.4% 59.9% 4.0 $46,593 Lake County 13,005 55.2% 42.7% 64.0% 22.9 $27,369 Lapeer County 89,168 82.9% 65.6% 84.8% 137.8 $38,273 Leelanau County 22,871 94.4% 93.6% 75.0% 65.9 $53,601 Lenawee County 97,746 98.8% 93.0% 92.6% 130.4 $33,914 Livingston County 196,976 95.6% 93.5% 96.8% 348.5 $49,962 Luce County 6,328 81.8% 81.0% 74.4% 7.0 $27,631 Mackinac County 11,144 76.5% 75.1% 69.0% 10.9 $34,862 Macomb County 886,175 99.6% 99.5% 99.7% 848.7 $39,467 Manistee County 25,519 70.7% 68.2% 79.0% 47.1 $34,636 Marquette County 67,979 85.1% 83.9% 86.9% 37.6 $34,471 Mason County 29,093 71.1% 63.3% 83.5% 58.8 $34,751 Mecosta County 41,947 87.8% 79.1% 76.9% 75.6 $28,744 Menominee County 23,050 83.1% 81.1% 70.0% 22.1 $32,264 Midland County 84,022 91.9% 88.6% 89.1% 162.4 $42,734 Missaukee County 15,239 76.3% 63.8% 77.4% 27.0 $30,435 Monroe County 156,045 97.8% 90.4% 98.9% 284.1 $39,303 Montcalm County 69,314 90.5% 73.9% 90.2% 98.3 $29,442 Montmorency County 9,828 63.5% 59.1% 65.2% 18.0 $30,306 Muskegon County 177,428 95.5% 94.1% 96.4% 352.1 $32,307 Newaygo County 51,504 85.1% 73.4% 65.3% 61.4 $30,694 Oakland County 1,296,888 99.4% 99.2% 99.6% 495.4 $55,114 Oceana County 27,014 85.8% 81.0% 76.3% 50.2 $31,577 Ogemaw County 20,985 70.6% 65.3% 67.8% 37.2 $30,529 Ontonagon County 5,824 79.8% 79.6% 57.8% 4.4 $32,741 Osceola County 23,484 53.0% 28.8% 86.6% 41.5 $29,129 Oscoda County 8,596 74.3% 72.2% 72.6% 15.2 $27,858 Otsego County 26,083 94.1% 93.4% 75.8% 50.6 $36,269 Ottawa County 306,235 97.4% 95.3% 99.2% 543.4 $40,682 Presque Isle County 13,230 95.3% 95.3% 70.2% 20.1 $36,235 Roscommon County 23,932 93.3% 91.4% 79.1% 46.0 $37,099 Saginaw County 187,714 95.0% 92.8% 95.5% 234.4 $33,992 Sanilac County 40,293 95.1% 82.5% 52.6% 41.9 $32,523 Schoolcraft County 8,178 86.3% 86.2% 66.1% 7.0 $35,744 Shiawassee County 67,982 86.3% 80.2% 93.7% 128.0 $34,107 St. Clair County 160,308 92.4% 84.4% 95.5% 222.2 $37,100 St. Joseph County 61,171 98.4% 92.7% 86.8% 122.2 $31,170 Tuscola County 52,757 90.7% 75.3% 58.6% 65.5 $31,511 Van Buren County 76,129 97.1% 95.5% 85.6% 125.3 $33,243 Washtenaw County 373,875 97.9% 95.3% 98.0% 529.6 $51,746 Wayne County 1,771,063 99.8% 99.7% 99.9% 894.7 $33,956 Wexford County 34,460 87.8% 83.2% 85.0% 61.0 $32,302 Minnesota 5,792,732 97.1% 93.7% 95.8% 72.7 $46,957 Aitkin County 16,335 86.5% 85.4% 74.3% 9.0 $35,185 Anoka County 376,840 98.5% 98.1% 99.3% 893.1 $44,418 Becker County 35,444 88.6% 85.4% 72.5% 27.0 $40,834 Beltrami County 46,762 99.5% 99.5% 74.6% 18.7 $34,429 Benton County 41,881 98.5% 98.2% 97.0% 102.6 $36,935 Big Stone County 5,067 99.3% 99.2% 67.2% 10.2 $36,923 Blue Earth County 70,700 99.5% 84.9% 95.3% 94.5 $36,299 Brown County 25,710 96.4% 85.7% 95.8% 42.1 $36,580 Carlton County 36,745 73.2% 67.8% 84.2% 42.7 $37,608 Carver County 112,628 99.9% 98.5% 99.6% 318.1 $58,254 Cass County 31,442 76.1% 74.3% 77.7% 15.6 $36,470 Chippewa County 12,299 100.0% 92.6% 87.2% 21.2 $35,205 Chisago County 59,105 84.4% 80.6% 97.0% 142.5 $43,265 Clay County 66,848 99.8% 94.6% 97.8% 64.0 $38,791 Clearwater County 8,630 99.5% 99.5% 75.9% 8.6 $32,682 Cook County 5,571 96.6% 96.6% 69.8% 3.8 $45,390 Cottonwood County 11,338 99.2% 68.7% 96.1% 17.7 $34,105 Crow Wing County 68,642 94.6% 94.0% 87.2% 68.8 $40,308 Dakota County 453,156 99.8% 97.8% 100.0% 805.6 $50,901 Dodge County 21,242 100.0% 89.9% 88.7% 48.4 $43,903 Douglas County 39,933 88.4% 87.6% 87.3% 62.7 $43,543 Faribault County 13,886 97.6% 90.5% 87.7% 19.5 $36,782 Fillmore County 21,502 89.0% 74.0% 80.4% 25.0 $37,134 Freeborn County 30,314 100.0% 90.4% 94.7% 42.9 $38,696 Goodhue County 47,982 95.1% 81.5% 90.0% 63.4 $42,254 Grant County 6,109 98.1% 97.3% 81.0% 11.2 $38,893 Hennepin County 1,273,334 99.8% 99.6% 100.0% 298.3 $57,633 Houston County 18,352 88.9% 86.8% 68.5% 33.2 $41,820 Hubbard County 22,050 97.9% 97.6% 76.5% 23.8 $38,262 Isanti County 43,687 81.9% 80.2% 91.7% 100.3 $40,123 Itasca County 45,442 98.4% 98.4% 81.4% 17.0 $36,315 Jackson County 9,861 98.4% 72.3% 86.6% 14.0 $39,494 Kanabec County 16,608 74.3% 72.8% 81.2% 31.8 $35,290 Kandiyohi County 44,674 100.0% 84.2% 93.5% 56.0 $37,618 Kittson County 3,992 99.9% 97.3% 83.3% 3.6 $37,697 Koochiching County 11,594 89.2% 89.0% 83.8% 3.7 $40,221 Lac qui Parle County 6,636 100.0% 100.0% 81.4% 8.7 $40,282 Lake County 10,698 89.7% 86.8% 82.9% 5.1 $40,666 Lake of the Woods County 3,797 86.3% 85.8% 86.1% 2.9 $39,814 Le Sueur County 29,458 97.9% 85.4% 92.7% 65.7 $43,236 Lincoln County 5,564 100.0% 99.9% 95.3% 10.4 $38,390 Lyon County 25,577 100.0% 85.0% 98.5% 35.8 $37,201 Mahnomen County 5,296 82.8% 75.4% 74.5% 9.5 $25,533 Marshall County 8,771 98.5% 94.4% 80.3% 4.9 $36,889 Martin County 19,561 100.0% 78.7% 91.2% 27.5 $37,466 McLeod County 36,780 96.7% 80.2% 99.6% 74.8 $41,336 Meeker County 23,491 99.3% 97.1% 90.1% 38.6 $37,014 Mille Lacs County 27,577 96.0% 74.6% 87.1% 48.2 $35,500 Morrison County 34,520 93.3% 83.4% 84.8% 30.7 $36,378 Mower County 40,900 99.2% 89.0% 90.3% 57.5 $35,609 Murray County 8,044 100.0% 62.8% 90.9% 11.4 $40,277 Nicollet County 34,493 98.6% 86.1% 97.0% 76.9 $43,268 Nobles County 21,969 100.0% 84.7% 94.2% 30.7 $30,310 Norman County 6,284 97.4% 75.8% 89.8% 7.2 $37,681 Olmsted County 166,424 98.7% 95.6% 99.0% 254.7 $52,059 Otter Tail County 60,884 91.4% 87.8% 81.8% 30.9 $38,723 Pennington County 13,652 98.9% 98.7% 88.3% 22.1 $39,863 Pine County 30,319 76.9% 74.4% 77.6% 21.5 $34,104 Pipestone County 9,100 100.0% 80.7% 84.1% 19.6 $36,551 Polk County 30,413 99.7% 98.9% 91.8% 15.4 $36,332 Pope County 11,495 99.8% 99.0% 70.8% 17.2 $40,027 Ramsey County 542,015 100.0% 99.8% 100.0% 560.1 $45,193 Red Lake County 3,882 100.0% 100.0% 91.3% 9.0 $36,616 Redwood County 15,254 93.0% 88.2% 90.9% 17.4 $33,771 Renville County 14,453 99.5% 71.9% 83.8% 14.7 $36,131 Rice County 69,025 99.1% 89.6% 96.8% 139.2 $38,276 Rock County 9,525 99.6% 99.2% 95.2% 19.7 $38,201 Roseau County 15,265 97.0% 96.0% 89.7% 9.1 $36,987 Scott County 157,206 99.0% 96.3% 99.7% 441.3 $53,499 Sherburne County 102,640 97.7% 95.2% 96.2% 237.1 $44,241 Sibley County 15,194 95.6% 63.0% 95.4% 25.8 $38,862 St. Louis County 200,794 87.7% 84.9% 91.5% 32.1 $39,778 Stearns County 163,997 96.9% 92.4% 97.7% 122.1 $37,806 Steele County 37,434 100.0% 89.1% 98.1% 87.1 $41,392 Stevens County 9,819 99.9% 99.9% 89.3% 17.4 $40,441 Swift County 9,666 99.8% 97.8% 87.3% 13.0 $36,519 Todd County 25,955 68.6% 62.4% 74.8% 27.5 $32,283 Traverse County 3,134 100.0% 86.3% 73.3% 5.5 $38,451 Wabasha County 21,574 80.7% 71.1% 85.7% 41.3 $42,262 Wadena County 14,437 99.6% 99.6% 72.6% 26.9 $30,037 Waseca County 18,684 100.0% 76.0% 95.9% 44.1 $37,199 Washington County 283,960 98.4% 97.2% 99.4% 738.1 $56,650 Watonwan County 11,204 100.0% 77.5% 96.7% 25.8 $35,659 Wilkin County 6,268 96.2% 94.9% 83.4% 8.3 $36,057 Winona County 49,973 95.3% 88.3% 90.6% 79.8 $37,447 Wright County 154,593 92.6% 85.5% 98.7% 233.8 $44,946 Yellow Medicine County 9,373 99.9% 72.8% 89.1% 12.3 $38,668 Mississippi 2,943,045 92.4% 88.5% 83.1% 62.7 $30,529 Adams County 28,674 90.3% 79.6% 88.5% 62.0 $24,717 Alcorn County 34,228 99.9% 99.9% 77.4% 85.6 $29,456 Amite County 12,451 33.3% 0.9% 43.9% 17.1 $24,941 Attala County 17,222 67.6% 60.0% 65.6% 23.4 $28,061 Benton County 7,566 56.1% 53.5% 64.3% 18.6 $23,870 Bolivar County 28,395 94.3% 85.8% 96.3% 32.4 $25,359 Calhoun County 12,754 98.3% 98.3% 64.9% 21.7 $25,398 Carroll County 9,378 98.0% 97.5% 43.2% 14.9 $32,822 Chickasaw County 16,774 93.6% 89.7% 67.8% 33.4 $22,365 Choctaw County 8,091 99.0% 98.7% 61.2% 19.3 $28,282 Claiborne County 8,122 23.8% 10.5% 58.6% 16.7 $18,619 Clarke County 15,155 91.5% 89.4% 64.4% 21.9 $26,974 Clay County 18,213 99.6% 99.4% 73.0% 44.4 $24,734 Coahoma County 20,105 95.2% 87.6% 92.1% 36.3 $23,098 Copiah County 27,536 62.7% 35.0% 69.6% 35.4 $28,574 Covington County 18,015 64.2% 50.1% 54.6% 43.5 $26,323 DeSoto County 195,871 99.3% 99.2% 97.6% 411.2 $36,569 Forrest County 78,435 98.1% 97.7% 93.2% 168.3 $29,525 Franklin County 7,516 60.3% 52.7% 53.6% 13.3 $27,379 George County 25,880 99.2% 98.6% 66.0% 54.1 $26,798 Greene County 13,675 93.1% 90.9% 64.5% 19.2 $19,275 Grenada County 20,931 94.4% 92.0% 78.4% 49.6 $27,886 Hancock County 46,492 99.9% 98.9% 88.4% 98.1 $38,730 Harrison County 213,730 100.0% 99.9% 95.8% 372.6 $31,586 Hinds County 211,975 92.9% 90.9% 96.8% 243.7 $29,336 Holmes County 15,560 79.4% 66.7% 57.3% 20.6 $22,044 Humphreys County 7,121 96.7% 80.0% 89.8% 17.0 $24,442 Issaquena County 1,295 66.0% 28.7% 71.9% 3.1 $13,843 Itawamba County 24,198 99.8% 99.2% 68.2% 45.4 $39,701 Jackson County 147,002 99.5% 99.2% 93.7% 203.4 $34,116 Jasper County 15,799 66.5% 62.7% 56.4% 23.4 $24,538 Jefferson County 6,900 16.4% 0.6% 63.7% 13.3 $20,430 Jefferson Davis County 11,059 62.0% 46.3% 41.2% 27.1 $24,065 Jones County 65,837 98.5% 97.6% 76.0% 94.8 $27,896 Kemper County 8,562 96.9% 96.7% 63.3% 11.2 $22,637 Lafayette County 59,843 99.9% 98.1% 84.0% 94.7 $34,960 Lamar County 66,734 94.6% 92.9% 90.2% 134.4 $38,615 Lauderdale County 70,588 99.5% 99.2% 83.2% 100.3 $28,464 Lawrence County 11,672 67.8% 31.5% 59.6% 27.1 $26,276 Leake County 21,462 61.4% 30.1% 73.4% 36.8 $26,895 Lee County 83,012 99.9% 99.9% 83.0% 184.5 $33,713 Leflore County 26,157 98.5% 95.7% 96.0% 44.0 $22,303 Lincoln County 34,956 75.7% 74.1% 68.0% 59.6 $26,925 Lowndes County 57,210 99.9% 99.8% 88.6% 113.2 $30,771 Madison County 114,247 97.4% 94.7% 94.6% 159.9 $47,771 Marion County 24,008 84.2% 77.4% 69.6% 44.3 $26,281 Marshall County 34,374 85.3% 83.9% 73.0% 48.7 $27,639 Monroe County 33,483 95.0% 91.2% 70.2% 43.8 $28,411 Montgomery County 9,411 95.9% 93.3% 72.4% 23.1 $26,387 Neshoba County 28,973 59.6% 50.3% 77.6% 50.8 $24,950 Newton County 21,063 66.3% 59.8% 71.1% 36.5 $29,039 Noxubee County 9,825 99.7% 98.9% 79.5% 14.1 $19,838 Oktibbeha County 51,965 99.5% 97.9% 88.8% 113.4 $28,906 Panola County 32,764 90.6% 89.0% 65.4% 47.8 $24,616 Pearl River County 59,030 95.8% 91.4% 60.0% 72.8 $28,399 Perry County 11,406 98.6% 78.1% 59.3% 17.6 $25,950 Pike County 38,980 92.4% 89.4% 78.9% 95.3 $23,094 Pontotoc County 32,014 98.7% 98.6% 69.3% 64.3 $27,217 Prentiss County 25,489 99.9% 99.8% 70.9% 61.4 $28,978 Quitman County 5,542 77.4% 69.9% 84.4% 13.7 $20,438 Rankin County 160,573 95.4% 90.6% 95.5% 207.1 $37,662 Scott County 27,666 78.3% 56.2% 72.7% 45.4 $23,915 Sharkey County 3,234 83.6% 62.2% 79.2% 7.5 $23,081 Simpson County 25,597 37.8% 16.8% 64.8% 43.4 $29,599 Smith County 14,051 91.4% 79.6% 67.1% 22.1 $25,965 Stone County 19,569 97.0% 89.3% 65.2% 43.9 $27,173 Sunflower County 23,029 91.9% 82.2% 91.3% 33.0 $19,429 Tallahatchie County 10,921 82.3% 76.4% 62.2% 16.9 $22,998 Tate County 28,551 81.9% 79.1% 75.6% 70.5 $29,748 Tippah County 21,423 97.0% 96.7% 69.2% 46.8 $29,459 Tishomingo County 18,553 100.0% 100.0% 68.7% 43.7 $28,582 Tunica County 9,157 77.9% 62.8% 90.0% 20.2 $22,574 Union County 28,363 99.9% 99.9% 70.6% 68.2 $28,173 Walthall County 13,839 89.1% 80.4% 69.1% 34.3 $28,082 Warren County 42,105 90.6% 85.9% 87.3% 71.5 $33,217 Washington County 41,181 94.2% 90.2% 97.2% 56.9 $24,162 Wayne County 19,749 100.0% 99.6% 58.0% 24.4 $26,336 Webster County 10,039 98.3% 94.7% 62.8% 23.8 $28,447 Wilkinson County 7,820 4.8% 0.0% 62.4% 11.5 $22,017 Winston County 17,418 99.8% 98.4% 62.6% 28.7 $28,856 Yalobusha County 12,458 94.1% 93.7% 58.2% 26.7 $24,974 Yazoo County 23,024 87.6% 52.8% 69.2% 25.0 $19,469 Missouri 6,245,465 96.1% 87.7% 92.0% 90.8 $38,497 Adair County 25,660 98.2% 91.6% 87.7% 45.2 $33,713 Andrew County 18,091 97.1% 95.2% 83.0% 41.8 $36,351 Atchison County 5,139 74.4% 70.1% 43.7% 9.4 $33,891 Audrain County 24,304 85.1% 79.6% 86.5% 35.1 $28,068 Barry County 35,618 92.9% 72.2% 71.9% 45.8 $31,473 Barton County 11,717 88.4% 13.3% 75.9% 19.8 $25,518 Bates County 16,394 98.6% 96.0% 71.5% 19.6 $28,444 Benton County 20,614 81.0% 68.6% 69.5% 29.3 $30,994 Bollinger County 10,610 75.5% 30.3% 70.4% 17.2 $26,681 Boone County 192,154 97.7% 96.3% 95.2% 280.3 $38,945 Buchanan County 83,574 99.8% 97.6% 96.6% 204.7 $32,930 Butler County 41,814 87.3% 72.2% 86.3% 60.2 $27,108 Caldwell County 9,000 75.5% 60.2% 79.2% 21.1 $31,963 Callaway County 45,126 99.9% 99.0% 80.4% 54.1 $32,920 Camden County 44,135 100.0% 77.6% 80.0% 67.3 $37,111 Cape Girardeau County 83,658 97.3% 91.0% 95.2% 144.6 $35,924 Carroll County 8,414 76.4% 74.7% 76.3% 12.1 $33,666 Carter County 5,359 21.6% 11.6% 71.8% 10.6 $27,115 Cass County 113,873 98.3% 94.2% 96.8% 163.5 $41,075 Cedar County 15,023 97.2% 95.6% 58.1% 31.7 $30,047 Chariton County 7,397 78.1% 75.8% 70.5% 9.8 $29,562 Christian County 96,045 93.2% 81.3% 92.8% 170.7 $38,535 Clark County 6,623 77.2% 49.4% 79.2% 13.1 $26,904 Clay County 263,370 99.3% 97.9% 98.9% 662.3 $42,336 Clinton County 21,721 98.5% 95.9% 90.4% 51.8 $36,216 Cole County 77,625 100.0% 84.6% 96.1% 198.3 $37,325 Cooper County 17,122 94.1% 88.3% 79.5% 30.3 $29,695 Crawford County 22,808 100.0% 54.6% 68.9% 30.7 $31,502 Dade County 7,622 85.5% 44.1% 71.4% 15.6 $29,523 Dallas County 17,877 66.4% 30.9% 65.7% 33.0 $27,078 Daviess County 8,541 83.4% 60.0% 78.2% 15.2 $30,925 DeKalb County 9,884 92.1% 90.0% 85.1% 23.5 $27,229 Dent County 14,721 100.0% 46.2% 61.6% 19.6 $27,470 Douglas County 12,290 76.2% 57.7% 47.1% 15.1 $29,926 Dunklin County 27,002 96.8% 96.7% 96.3% 49.8 $26,121 Franklin County 107,256 100.0% 66.6% 87.0% 116.2 $36,524 Gasconade County 14,655 100.0% 47.6% 74.1% 28.2 $35,247 Gentry County 6,298 97.1% 96.9% 84.6% 12.8 $29,984 Greene County 307,941 98.4% 94.5% 97.6% 456.0 $35,189 Grundy County 9,766 93.8% 93.8% 76.6% 22.4 $30,705 Harrison County 8,186 93.7% 93.2% 77.4% 11.3 $25,701 Henry County 22,575 93.1% 79.9% 89.3% 32.4 $32,566 Hickory County 8,766 75.8% 25.1% 58.0% 22.0 $21,208 Holt County 4,241 81.0% 78.8% 66.2% 9.2 $34,933 Howard County 10,150 81.4% 81.4% 55.5% 21.9 $30,241 Howell County 40,762 79.6% 43.2% 75.4% 44.0 $26,493 Iron County 9,420 100.0% 53.0% 64.6% 17.1 $26,755 Jackson County 727,362 99.5% 98.5% 99.7% 203.2 $38,344 Jasper County 126,479 96.0% 89.0% 96.3% 198.1 $29,914 Jefferson County 231,888 96.2% 85.7% 96.0% 353.2 $37,869 Johnson County 55,880 96.3% 84.6% 89.3% 67.4 $32,093 Knox County 3,740 71.8% 27.9% 57.8% 7.4 $26,225 Laclede County 36,738 100.0% 49.0% 78.0% 48.0 $28,202 Lafayette County 33,511 88.5% 77.6% 94.0% 53.3 $35,510 Lawrence County 39,151 93.1% 65.6% 85.0% 64.0 $27,516 Lewis County 9,852 80.8% 57.3% 81.1% 19.5 $26,018 Lincoln County 65,888 93.7% 79.8% 85.4% 105.2 $35,401 Linn County 11,910 94.6% 92.4% 78.7% 19.3 $33,769 Livingston County 14,658 82.9% 81.5% 85.6% 27.5 $31,414 Macon County 15,177 97.3% 95.3% 76.1% 18.9 $29,099 Madison County 12,852 84.4% 45.1% 77.1% 26.0 $30,380 Maries County 8,506 100.0% 23.2% 53.1% 16.1 $31,622 Marion County 28,425 99.3% 98.9% 89.0% 65.1 $30,958 McDonald County 24,054 56.5% 53.0% 67.3% 44.6 $24,491 Mercer County 3,452 94.5% 93.5% 59.6% 7.6 $26,940 Miller County 25,668 100.0% 49.3% 73.1% 43.3 $30,290 Mississippi County 11,750 93.7% 93.4% 94.1% 28.5 $22,547 Moniteau County 15,294 98.7% 94.2% 75.5% 36.9 $29,379 Monroe County 8,890 83.3% 74.9% 75.1% 13.7 $27,776 Montgomery County 11,511 73.4% 70.3% 78.6% 21.5 $29,876 Morgan County 22,399 100.0% 93.7% 67.5% 37.5 $30,589 New Madrid County 15,212 97.6% 97.0% 92.7% 22.5 $28,435 Newton County 61,519 81.1% 63.0% 90.0% 98.5 $32,855 Nodaway County 20,503 97.5% 97.4% 81.6% 23.4 $28,894 Oregon County 8,699 54.9% 47.8% 56.8% 11.0 $23,220 Osage County 13,478 100.0% 26.8% 66.6% 22.2 $41,107 Ozark County 9,090 74.1% 61.1% 50.5% 12.2 $29,824 Pemiscot County 14,407 98.8% 98.6% 97.4% 29.2 $26,073 Perry County 19,100 90.6% 50.5% 86.6% 40.3 $32,616 Pettis County 43,791 93.3% 73.3% 90.5% 64.2 $30,954 Phelps County 45,672 100.0% 85.0% 82.3% 68.0 $29,191 Pike County 17,961 87.3% 68.7% 76.6% 26.8 $27,443 Platte County 113,207 98.9% 95.4% 97.0% 269.7 $49,273 Polk County 33,070 84.4% 36.0% 76.1% 52.0 $28,199 Pulaski County 53,964 100.0% 79.1% 80.6% 98.6 $29,250 Putnam County 4,539 98.2% 98.2% 68.6% 8.8 $33,208 Ralls County 10,499 98.0% 97.8% 78.9% 22.3 $31,075 Randolph County 24,077 88.3% 84.7% 84.2% 49.9 $27,268 Ray County 23,199 89.0% 73.7% 82.7% 40.8 $38,179 Reynolds County 5,927 100.0% 46.7% 34.7% 7.3 $26,576 Ripley County 10,715 44.4% 43.5% 47.7% 17.0 $23,691 Saline County 23,325 90.7% 87.0% 89.2% 30.9 $28,530 Schuyler County 4,069 92.2% 61.2% 78.2% 13.2 $23,774 Scotland County 4,698 97.7% 88.7% 54.1% 10.8 $30,417 Scott County 37,957 98.3% 97.9% 93.9% 90.4 $32,341 Shannon County 7,275 100.0% 9.3% 61.6% 7.2 $25,451 Shelby County 5,926 99.7% 98.7% 72.1% 11.8 $28,270 St. Charles County 423,726 98.3% 97.6% 99.0% 756.0 $49,859 St. Clair County 9,848 92.5% 68.3% 42.5% 14.6 $26,548 St. Francois County 67,503 100.0% 100.0% 91.6% 149.4 $27,266 St. Louis County 992,929 99.5% 99.0% 99.6% 955.1 $51,085 St. Louis city 279,695 99.8% 98.7% 100.0% 530.5 $38,947 Ste. Genevieve County 18,546 95.5% 70.8% 81.6% 37.2 $34,056 Stoddard County 28,438 96.8% 96.1% 84.9% 34.5 $27,411 Stone County 32,630 60.8% 42.2% 71.9% 70.3 $33,582 Sullivan County 5,750 97.9% 97.9% 58.9% 8.9 $27,916 Taney County 56,744 98.6% 94.3% 89.8% 89.7 $31,125 Texas County 25,715 100.0% 29.5% 64.7% 21.8 $24,570 Vernon County 19,787 89.1% 67.0% 83.6% 23.9 $26,360 Warren County 38,478 88.1% 85.6% 83.6% 89.8 $36,403 Washington County 23,583 100.0% 23.6% 75.5% 31.0 $28,855 Wayne County 10,820 43.7% 42.4% 55.6% 14.3 $24,091 Webster County 42,041 70.2% 37.4% 65.0% 70.9 $29,530 Worth County 1,872 98.9% 98.9% 69.1% 7.0 $32,793 Wright County 19,505 100.0% 33.7% 69.2% 28.6 $23,682 Montana 1,137,233 87.5% 77.1% 91.3% 7.8 $39,842 Beaverhead County 10,006 96.6% 73.7% 83.4% 1.8 $34,683 Big Horn County 12,796 79.0% 63.5% 81.9% 2.6 $22,453 Blaine County 6,903 98.7% 98.5% 87.0% 1.6 $27,817 Broadwater County 8,302 34.1% 25.4% 85.2% 7.0 $38,093 Carbon County 11,498 78.6% 32.3% 89.6% 5.6 $42,734 Carter County 1,399 59.8% 53.5% 50.0% 0.4 $29,865 Cascade County 84,523 89.3% 86.9% 95.9% 31.3 $36,562 Chouteau County 5,880 97.1% 97.1% 69.0% 1.5 $31,978 Custer County 11,964 85.8% 79.7% 93.8% 3.2 $35,864 Daniels County 1,625 99.1% 99.1% 68.4% 1.1 $35,113 Dawson County 8,731 92.6% 89.4% 92.6% 3.7 $36,998 Deer Lodge County 9,811 87.2% 83.9% 93.1% 13.3 $32,758 Fallon County 2,946 92.6% 91.3% 85.5% 1.8 $42,214 Fergus County 11,862 82.1% 79.1% 82.5% 2.7 $34,970 Flathead County 114,527 81.6% 70.2% 91.7% 22.5 $39,403 Gallatin County 126,984 93.4% 83.2% 96.3% 48.7 $51,148 Garfield County 1,181 53.3% 51.5% 46.1% 0.3 $35,206 Glacier County 13,503 59.5% 36.4% 86.7% 4.5 $22,605 Golden Valley County 863 96.8% 96.3% 72.9% 0.7 $33,523 Granite County 3,602 58.4% 57.4% 71.9% 2.1 $36,922 Hill County 16,065 94.2% 91.5% 91.9% 5.5 $29,497 Jefferson County 13,304 57.6% 44.9% 87.5% 8.0 $43,037 Judith Basin County 2,111 95.5% 95.1% 72.6% 1.1 $38,715 Lake County 33,403 72.7% 65.6% 90.7% 22.4 $33,786 Lewis and Clark County 75,129 87.5% 83.3% 93.8% 21.7 $43,263 Liberty County 1,934 84.2% 83.7% 57.7% 1.4 $32,500 Lincoln County 22,184 74.8% 73.4% 67.7% 6.1 $29,864 Madison County 9,753 90.9% 90.0% 83.4% 2.7 $39,413 McCone County 1,717 71.3% 68.0% 59.8% 0.6 $38,749 Meagher County 2,065 96.2% 96.0% 73.8% 0.9 $34,766 Mineral County 5,195 30.7% 0.3% 84.7% 4.3 $37,583 Missoula County 122,546 96.3% 84.0% 93.8% 47.3 $43,142 Musselshell County 5,452 96.2% 94.7% 66.5% 2.9 $35,879 Park County 18,074 85.5% 52.3% 89.0% 6.4 $45,894 Petroleum County 525 52.0% 49.9% 58.5% 0.3 $39,877 Phillips County 4,214 86.7% 86.6% 76.3% 0.8 $34,241 Pondera County 6,078 78.5% 78.5% 80.9% 3.7 $28,921 Powder River County 1,734 55.6% 52.8% 42.0% 0.5 $41,750 Powell County 7,120 49.3% 44.2% 86.8% 3.1 $30,316 Prairie County 1,112 92.2% 90.8% 64.1% 0.6 $29,068 Ravalli County 48,187 88.8% 54.2% 91.4% 20.2 $39,767 Richland County 11,028 93.3% 91.3% 88.0% 5.3 $37,672 Roosevelt County 10,197 78.3% 73.2% 83.0% 4.3 $21,143 Rosebud County 8,194 56.7% 44.0% 68.3% 1.6 $28,291 Sanders County 13,895 82.0% 73.6% 73.6% 5.0 $31,554 Sheridan County 3,448 81.8% 81.8% 69.1% 2.1 $41,202 Silver Bow County 36,134 94.3% 87.2% 97.9% 50.3 $34,925 Stillwater County 9,450 85.7% 49.9% 81.0% 5.3 $48,923 Sweet Grass County 3,757 99.1% 98.7% 81.3% 2.0 $39,756 Teton County 6,444 97.7% 96.1% 86.2% 2.8 $31,794 Toole County 5,153 12.2% 5.1% 85.4% 2.7 $29,977 Treasure County 739 17.7% 17.7% 76.7% 0.8 $45,882 Valley County 7,434 81.6% 64.3% 81.5% 1.5 $31,869 Wheatland County 2,058 97.9% 97.2% 79.3% 1.4 $27,719 Wibaux County 911 96.8% 96.8% 75.6% 1.0 $34,671 Yellowstone County 171,583 98.0% 88.8% 98.7% 65.2 $42,894 N. Mariana Isl. 51,119 17.4% 0.6% 84.8% 280.3 N/A Rota Municipality 2,045 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 62.2 N/A Saipan Municipality 46,865 15.8% 0.6% 92.5% 20.9 N/A Tinian Municipality 2,209 66.7% 0.4% 0.0% 52.9 N/A Nebraska 2,005,943 97.1% 91.4% 92.8% 26.1 $40,637 Adams County 31,196 99.3% 94.1% 87.0% 55.4 $36,480 Antelope County 6,358 82.3% 78.7% 53.9% 7.4 $34,013 Arthur County 423 99.8% 99.8% 50.8% 0.6 $31,870 Banner County 665 65.3% 9.6% 42.0% 0.9 $36,650 Blaine County 454 76.9% 76.0% 48.7% 0.6 $41,319 Boone County 5,354 92.1% 71.7% 71.8% 7.8 $36,659 Box Butte County 10,703 99.5% 98.9% 89.2% 10.0 $33,834 Boyd County 1,700 100.0% 100.0% 20.1% 3.1 $36,652 Brown County 2,877 88.3% 87.6% 91.2% 2.4 $37,034 Buffalo County 51,156 96.1% 91.0% 94.8% 52.8 $37,873 Burt County 6,727 99.2% 83.2% 79.6% 13.7 $35,034 Butler County 8,439 97.5% 74.6% 61.5% 14.4 $44,445 Cass County 27,492 97.6% 77.4% 87.2% 49.3 $43,087 Cedar County 8,262 90.4% 86.5% 72.6% 11.2 $37,749 Chase County 3,764 96.3% 84.7% 69.1% 4.2 $36,913 Cherry County 5,558 81.5% 80.9% 70.3% 0.9 $33,287 Cheyenne County 9,602 95.5% 83.5% 93.1% 8.0 $34,946 Clay County 6,103 99.5% 78.0% 54.9% 10.7 $38,344 Colfax County 10,826 97.2% 80.8% 88.6% 26.3 $32,757 Cuming County 8,952 99.0% 80.5% 75.1% 15.7 $37,753 Custer County 10,487 89.0% 81.1% 80.0% 4.1 $37,311 Dakota County 21,335 97.2% 94.6% 96.6% 80.7 $29,781 Dawes County 8,003 89.9% 82.4% 80.2% 5.7 $29,623 Dawson County 24,554 93.5% 89.5% 92.3% 24.2 $37,634 Deuel County 1,892 89.6% 84.1% 88.5% 4.3 $40,271 Dixon County 5,526 89.0% 88.3% 54.0% 11.6 $39,214 Dodge County 38,355 98.9% 93.2% 94.9% 72.5 $34,866 Douglas County 601,158 99.2% 97.1% 100.0% 841.7 $45,178 Dundy County 1,581 98.0% 97.2% 59.1% 1.7 $37,387 Fillmore County 5,512 99.7% 81.2% 89.0% 9.6 $43,413 Franklin County 2,817 81.9% 71.5% 50.0% 4.9 $37,400 Frontier County 2,536 92.5% 91.6% 17.3% 2.6 $32,184 Furnas County 4,468 92.6% 86.9% 68.9% 6.2 $33,112 Gage County 21,687 98.6% 91.3% 82.7% 25.5 $35,827 Garden County 1,804 76.7% 58.3% 55.5% 1.1 $31,288 Garfield County 1,707 98.5% 98.4% 78.4% 3.0 $35,332 Gosper County 1,808 66.7% 56.3% 56.5% 3.9 $38,340 Grant County 573 69.8% 69.8% 39.8% 0.7 $34,449 Greeley County 2,197 74.9% 64.9% 62.1% 3.9 $31,028 Hall County 62,869 99.4% 97.4% 99.5% 115.1 $34,636 Hamilton County 9,564 99.7% 99.5% 78.1% 17.6 $37,482 Harlan County 3,018 80.5% 78.8% 65.9% 5.5 $39,947 Hayes County 846 60.4% 38.8% 34.9% 1.2 $36,639 Hitchcock County 2,460 69.1% 5.9% 56.1% 3.5 $31,032 Holt County 10,120 88.9% 75.7% 79.0% 4.2 $36,251 Hooker County 698 96.7% 96.7% 88.7% 1.0 $33,363 Howard County 6,572 82.7% 74.2% 71.7% 11.5 $35,045 Jefferson County 7,136 97.1% 91.5% 76.4% 12.5 $31,576 Johnson County 5,219 95.2% 58.2% 73.7% 13.9 $25,942 Kearney County 6,749 94.3% 83.0% 78.2% 13.1 $41,967 Keith County 8,148 96.2% 87.9% 91.5% 7.7 $35,660 Keya Paha County 819 93.2% 93.2% 39.9% 1.1 $33,388 Kimball County 3,305 90.7% 80.0% 86.6% 3.5 $33,603 Knox County 8,306 61.3% 60.1% 60.4% 7.5 $32,687 Lancaster County 332,857 99.3% 95.8% 99.0% 397.4 $40,663 Lincoln County 33,319 94.1% 90.7% 95.0% 13.0 $34,117 Logan County 694 87.6% 87.6% 67.7% 1.2 $38,059 Loup County 582 90.4% 90.4% 36.3% 1.0 $32,676 Madison County 35,579 97.0% 88.6% 91.1% 62.1 $35,734 McPherson County 376 58.0% 33.8% 44.4% 0.4 $34,279 Merrick County 7,837 95.7% 76.9% 80.5% 16.1 $34,539 Morrill County 4,485 89.8% 59.4% 87.2% 3.1 $33,101 Nance County 3,262 86.8% 75.7% 57.1% 7.4 $32,738 Nemaha County 7,046 94.7% 77.3% 68.7% 17.3 $36,578 Nuckolls County 4,094 88.5% 73.2% 27.8% 7.1 $40,215 Otoe County 16,591 95.9% 75.7% 90.8% 26.9 $41,885 Pawnee County 2,521 89.3% 58.7% 69.0% 5.8 $29,935 Perkins County 2,779 86.0% 60.3% 56.0% 3.1 $36,539 Phelps County 9,042 92.0% 89.7% 82.7% 16.8 $39,646 Pierce County 7,334 95.1% 84.5% 82.3% 12.8 $35,469 Platte County 35,499 99.8% 92.6% 90.8% 52.7 $37,137 Polk County 5,269 93.5% 74.4% 74.7% 12.0 $36,569 Red Willow County 10,409 95.6% 83.5% 88.0% 14.5 $36,390 Richardson County 7,666 97.3% 91.9% 86.7% 13.9 $35,481 Rock County 1,241 8.8% 6.5% 28.8% 1.2 $35,740 Saline County 14,740 98.3% 82.1% 86.2% 25.7 $33,299 Sarpy County 204,828 99.3% 96.5% 99.3% 860.3 $46,140 Saunders County 23,406 95.5% 77.0% 82.9% 31.3 $41,922 Scotts Bluff County 35,734 99.9% 86.4% 96.4% 48.3 $34,209 Seward County 17,769 98.9% 87.2% 61.8% 31.1 $38,045 Sheridan County 4,927 82.7% 75.5% 60.2% 2.0 $37,162 Sherman County 2,949 84.0% 78.8% 65.3% 5.2 $32,460 Sioux County 1,099 77.3% 33.3% 57.8% 0.5 $29,650 Stanton County 5,756 92.7% 81.4% 70.2% 13.5 $38,981 Thayer County 4,870 90.5% 75.0% 78.3% 8.5 $34,314 Thomas County 634 81.2% 69.1% 81.2% 0.9 $42,157 Thurston County 6,637 48.4% 20.0% 74.0% 16.9 $25,128 Valley County 4,032 86.5% 79.1% 68.7% 7.1 $38,033 Washington County 21,254 80.8% 69.2% 85.1% 54.5 $46,114 Wayne County 9,870 87.0% 82.6% 77.1% 22.3 $31,864 Webster County 3,326 90.9% 88.4% 63.5% 5.8 $35,259 Wheeler County 815 74.4% 73.7% 56.4% 1.4 $39,076 York County 14,375 99.9% 81.1% 81.4% 25.1 $36,571 Nevada 3,267,466 99.3% 93.8% 99.2% 29.7 $39,963 Carson City 58,148 100.0% 94.9% 99.1% 402.3 $38,222 Churchill County 26,033 92.9% 86.7% 98.2% 5.3 $37,304 Clark County 2,398,871 99.8% 95.2% 99.7% 304.0 $38,654 Douglas County 49,564 99.3% 94.2% 99.2% 69.8 $52,915 Elko County 54,362 95.5% 87.8% 97.5% 3.2 $39,474 Esmeralda County 720 3.2% 0.3% 81.0% 0.2 $31,096 Eureka County 1,877 100.0% 0.0% 91.5% 0.4 $32,518 Humboldt County 17,116 94.7% 68.3% 86.8% 1.8 $37,798 Lander County 5,785 96.3% 58.3% 93.5% 1.0 $38,889 Lincoln County 4,345 61.5% 35.0% 52.1% 0.4 $35,524 Lyon County 63,718 98.4% 80.6% 98.6% 31.8 $37,349 Mineral County 4,475 100.0% 70.2% 94.1% 1.2 $26,359 Nye County 55,990 94.7% 76.4% 94.3% 3.1 $32,336 Pershing County 6,536 81.9% 30.9% 96.8% 1.1 $26,884 Storey County 4,112 100.0% 42.5% 99.2% 15.6 $50,554 Washoe County 507,280 99.6% 97.0% 98.9% 80.3 $46,857 White Pine County 8,534 51.0% 0.2% 90.8% 1.0 $30,635 New Hampshire 1,409,032 99.0% 98.7% 78.4% 157.4 $50,867 Belknap County 65,257 99.7% 99.7% 56.1% 162.4 $47,000 Carroll County 52,580 97.5% 97.3% 46.9% 56.4 $49,562 Cheshire County 78,078 95.6% 95.3% 60.1% 110.5 $41,683 Coos County 31,094 98.4% 92.1% 67.2% 17.3 $36,850 Grafton County 93,045 96.1% 95.1% 63.7% 54.5 $49,835 Hillsborough County 430,462 99.8% 99.8% 88.5% 491.1 $52,243 Merrimack County 157,869 99.0% 98.9% 63.6% 169.2 $47,056 Rockingham County 322,433 99.8% 99.8% 90.6% 463.7 $59,710 Strafford County 134,202 99.9% 99.8% 84.8% 365.2 $44,406 Sullivan County 44,012 95.6% 95.2% 65.7% 81.8 $41,921 New Jersey 9,500,851 99.6% 99.5% 98.6% 291.8 $53,118 Atlantic County 279,114 99.6% 99.2% 98.1% 502.4 $41,448 Bergen County 978,641 99.9% 99.8% 99.7% 204.0 $62,986 Burlington County 475,515 99.4% 99.3% 98.5% 594.9 $53,077 Camden County 533,988 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 412.3 $44,380 Cape May County 93,875 99.5% 99.3% 98.8% 373.2 $54,325 Cumberland County 155,678 97.0% 96.8% 93.2% 322.1 $33,587 Essex County 881,527 99.8% 99.7% 99.9% 991.6 $48,021 Gloucester County 311,783 99.8% 99.6% 99.6% 968.3 $47,760 Hudson County 736,185 99.8% 99.5% 100.0% 937.0 $53,998 Hunterdon County 131,708 98.4% 97.6% 88.2% 307.8 $71,070 Mercer County 392,138 99.8% 99.8% 99.4% 747.2 $52,101 Middlesex County 890,119 99.8% 99.7% 99.4% 878.6 $49,417 Monmouth County 647,520 99.8% 99.8% 99.2% 383.1 $65,545 Morris County 523,053 99.5% 99.2% 97.0% 134.7 $69,226 Ocean County 666,434 99.8% 99.8% 98.5% 60.7 $43,900 Passaic County 526,597 99.9% 99.8% 99.0% 831.0 $40,241 Salem County 65,874 97.1% 95.7% 95.3% 198.5 $39,397 Somerset County 357,467 99.7% 99.7% 93.9% 184.2 $70,321 Sussex County 147,444 99.5% 99.3% 91.8% 284.3 $56,471 Union County 594,160 100.0% 99.9% 100.0% 781.7 $51,850 Warren County 112,031 96.2% 94.7% 94.4% 314.2 $48,232 New Mexico 2,130,256 92.4% 84.2% 95.3% 17.6 $34,823 Bernalillo County 671,747 99.0% 97.4% 99.2% 578.5 $39,234 Catron County 3,795 9.9% 9.9% 25.7% 0.5 $29,980 Chaves County 63,697 90.5% 88.9% 99.6% 10.5 $28,273 Cibola County 26,686 64.1% 60.4% 78.6% 5.9 $25,032 Colfax County 12,307 71.7% 66.8% 95.1% 3.3 $31,126 Curry County 47,156 96.6% 95.2% 99.8% 33.6 $28,959 De Baca County 1,657 94.3% 94.1% 78.0% 0.7 $29,840 Doña Ana County 229,366 95.9% 86.7% 99.8% 60.2 $28,726 Eddy County 61,436 90.9% 89.1% 99.4% 14.7 $37,698 Grant County 27,541 84.9% 74.0% 92.2% 7.0 $30,395 Guadalupe County 4,385 85.5% 85.5% 86.2% 1.4 $30,367 Harding County 635 93.2% 92.4% 66.5% 0.3 $55,520 Hidalgo County 3,966 14.2% 2.8% 91.9% 1.2 $25,587 Lea County 75,151 92.0% 90.5% 98.9% 17.1 $31,554 Lincoln County 20,025 82.8% 82.5% 82.9% 4.1 $36,086 Los Alamos County 19,675 99.8% 99.6% 99.3% 180.3 $72,684 Luna County 25,878 77.9% 64.5% 97.6% 8.7 $21,871 McKinley County 68,945 79.3% 46.6% 71.4% 12.6 $19,580 Mora County 4,096 93.5% 92.3% 59.2% 2.1 $34,616 Otero County 69,711 92.4% 88.9% 90.0% 10.5 $28,186 Quay County 8,403 85.2% 84.9% 94.1% 2.9 $27,087 Rio Arriba County 39,955 92.6% 30.5% 82.8% 6.8 $30,548 Roosevelt County 18,713 92.5% 91.7% 97.8% 7.7 $26,105 San Juan County 120,817 86.7% 71.8% 95.9% 21.9 $26,583 San Miguel County 26,428 89.4% 72.9% 86.3% 5.6 $28,140 Sandoval County 157,757 91.1% 84.0% 93.7% 42.5 $39,698 Santa Fe County 157,765 97.2% 75.9% 95.9% 82.6 $48,908 Sierra County 11,389 92.3% 89.9% 91.0% 2.7 $24,882 Socorro County 15,967 55.0% 46.2% 81.1% 2.4 $25,898 Taos County 34,482 98.9% 93.0% 76.8% 15.7 $40,018 Torrance County 15,986 50.3% 27.5% 85.0% 4.8 $24,922 Union County 3,926 77.8% 77.4% 89.4% 1.0 $37,697 Valencia County 80,813 84.8% 77.4% 99.4% 75.8 $30,066 New York 19,867,238 98.9% 98.0% 96.2% 421.6 $49,520 Albany County 319,964 99.0% 97.9% 97.8% 611.9 $46,231 Allegany County 47,299 94.2% 93.8% 68.4% 45.9 $30,016 Bronx County 1,384,724 99.7% 99.6% 100.0% 835.3 $26,956 Broome County 196,397 97.9% 97.6% 94.0% 278.3 $35,116 Cattaraugus County 75,475 87.7% 85.7% 80.6% 57.7 $31,173 Cayuga County 74,567 94.3% 90.7% 87.5% 107.8 $36,547 Chautauqua County 124,105 94.3% 93.2% 88.6% 117.0 $31,951 Chemung County 81,115 98.8% 97.9% 94.1% 199.1 $35,624 Chenango County 45,776 84.7% 81.7% 71.6% 51.2 $32,986 Clinton County 77,871 95.8% 94.4% 78.4% 75.0 $37,388 Columbia County 60,299 95.6% 95.0% 77.7% 95.0 $53,325 Cortland County 45,945 95.9% 95.2% 89.6% 92.1 $33,818 Delaware County 44,191 95.9% 95.6% 57.3% 30.6 $35,996 Dutchess County 299,963 97.3% 96.9% 88.1% 377.0 $51,784 Erie County 950,602 99.3% 98.8% 99.3% 911.6 $41,560 Essex County 36,744 91.0% 90.7% 65.9% 20.5 $40,807 Franklin County 47,086 82.1% 81.2% 62.2% 28.9 $31,801 Fulton County 52,073 95.1% 94.6% 80.7% 105.1 $34,843 Genesee County 57,604 97.7% 96.6% 95.6% 116.9 $36,737 Greene County 46,903 98.7% 98.6% 64.3% 72.5 $41,292 Hamilton County 5,082 79.0% 78.5% 62.1% 3.0 $41,820 Herkimer County 59,585 94.9% 93.7% 84.6% 42.2 $35,959 Jefferson County 113,140 94.5% 93.8% 92.1% 89.2 $34,603 Kings County 2,617,631 99.9% 99.3% 100.0% 730.8 $46,057 Lewis County 26,570 90.4% 86.4% 72.8% 20.8 $32,690 Livingston County 61,561 87.4% 85.7% 89.9% 97.4 $37,479 Madison County 67,072 95.5% 94.4% 92.0% 102.4 $39,904 Monroe County 752,202 99.3% 97.9% 99.6% 145.0 $43,137 Montgomery County 49,648 88.7% 87.1% 86.6% 123.2 $31,975 Nassau County 1,392,438 99.9% 99.9% 99.4% 893.6 $62,743 New York County 1,660,664 99.5% 97.0% 100.0% 298.2 $94,922 Niagara County 209,570 99.0% 98.3% 96.6% 401.2 $37,898 Oneida County 228,347 96.5% 95.7% 91.9% 188.4 $36,865 Onondaga County 469,812 99.6% 98.9% 99.3% 603.6 $41,538 Ontario County 113,012 98.7% 96.6% 95.1% 175.5 $44,500 Orange County 411,759 98.7% 92.1% 91.6% 506.9 $42,019 Orleans County 39,686 96.1% 94.0% 89.4% 101.4 $34,352 Oswego County 118,304 97.2% 96.7% 83.6% 124.3 $35,222 Otsego County 60,524 88.0% 86.3% 72.9% 60.4 $36,506 Putnam County 98,409 99.3% 99.2% 86.4% 427.5 $54,914 Queens County 2,316,841 99.8% 99.6% 100.0% 309.4 $41,160 Rensselaer County 160,749 99.0% 97.7% 93.8% 246.4 $45,113 Richmond County 498,212 99.9% 99.8% 99.9% 661.2 $44,368 Rockland County 348,144 99.9% 98.7% 95.1% 7.2 $45,538 Saratoga County 240,360 98.6% 97.9% 90.9% 296.7 $54,698 Schenectady County 162,261 99.1% 98.8% 97.6% 793.1 $41,529 Schoharie County 30,151 96.3% 95.8% 70.4% 48.5 $38,100 Schuyler County 17,121 92.7% 91.7% 80.9% 52.1 $36,356 Seneca County 32,650 99.6% 95.0% 95.1% 100.9 $36,170 St. Lawrence County 106,198 93.0% 91.8% 76.0% 39.6 $31,574 Steuben County 92,015 92.1% 91.1% 81.9% 66.2 $36,754 Suffolk County 1,535,909 99.6% 99.0% 95.2% 685.6 $56,341 Sullivan County 80,450 95.8% 94.3% 73.6% 83.1 $40,474 Tioga County 47,574 95.7% 95.1% 80.5% 91.7 $41,155 Tompkins County 105,602 97.3% 93.7% 92.9% 222.5 $42,505 Ulster County 182,976 97.0% 96.5% 80.8% 162.8 $45,702 Warren County 65,288 97.4% 96.5% 83.2% 75.3 $46,191 Washington County 59,839 94.5% 91.3% 78.9% 72.0 $35,496 Wayne County 90,757 98.2% 97.3% 91.3% 150.3 $37,916 Westchester County 1,006,447 99.6% 99.5% 96.2% 336.6 $70,607 Wyoming County 39,588 84.1% 81.9% 81.9% 66.8 $37,185 Yates County 24,387 92.8% 87.0% 79.8% 72.1 $34,262 North Carolina 11,046,022 95.6% 94.5% 90.5% 227.2 $39,616 Alamance County 183,040 97.0% 96.2% 98.2% 432.3 $33,281 Alexander County 36,693 78.1% 76.7% 84.0% 141.1 $32,565 Alleghany County 11,379 98.9% 98.9% 32.8% 48.5 $33,059 Anson County 22,432 84.3% 75.7% 77.4% 42.2 $23,702 Ashe County 27,266 99.9% 99.9% 34.6% 64.0 $31,486 Avery County 17,811 74.3% 74.2% 69.6% 72.0 $33,899 Beaufort County 44,576 93.8% 92.5% 74.5% 53.5 $33,912 Bertie County 16,939 85.1% 82.2% 37.9% 24.2 $27,082 Bladen County 29,777 86.8% 86.0% 56.5% 34.0 $28,970 Brunswick County 167,112 99.5% 99.4% 91.4% 196.6 $44,565 Buncombe County 279,210 97.2% 96.1% 88.6% 425.3 $40,879 Burke County 88,543 92.9% 91.2% 88.1% 174.9 $31,184 Cabarrus County 244,925 97.7% 97.0% 99.8% 678.0 $40,652 Caldwell County 80,739 95.9% 95.2% 89.8% 171.1 $30,811 Camden County 11,184 80.4% 78.7% 52.0% 46.5 $38,350 Carteret County 70,259 98.5% 98.2% 73.9% 138.4 $42,707 Caswell County 22,363 88.0% 87.0% 34.9% 52.6 $28,281 Catawba County 167,054 97.0% 96.0% 95.0% 416.2 $36,025 Chatham County 83,874 84.5% 82.0% 72.0% 123.0 $56,724 Cherokee County 30,373 60.1% 56.2% 37.8% 66.7 $30,800 Chowan County 13,891 98.5% 98.4% 53.9% 80.5 $33,974 Clay County 12,042 67.3% 66.2% 43.6% 56.0 $35,326 Cleveland County 102,194 95.9% 94.5% 93.7% 220.1 $29,849 Columbus County 50,054 97.1% 96.7% 54.5% 53.4 $26,755 Craven County 104,167 96.9% 95.9% 89.8% 147.4 $36,745 Cumberland County 338,430 98.8% 98.2% 98.8% 518.6 $31,206 Currituck County 32,278 93.0% 89.0% 78.1% 123.2 $44,165 Dare County 38,183 99.1% 98.8% 86.3% 99.6 $46,784 Davidson County 177,809 98.9% 98.6% 98.2% 321.4 $32,759 Davie County 45,383 99.7% 99.7% 97.0% 172.1 $39,128 Duplin County 50,539 91.7% 86.6% 67.8% 62.0 $27,599 Durham County 343,628 98.7% 96.9% 98.9% 199.3 $46,931 Edgecombe County 49,124 85.4% 83.6% 85.0% 97.2 $27,235 Forsyth County 398,143 99.6% 98.9% 99.8% 976.2 $37,375 Franklin County 79,771 81.3% 79.1% 73.7% 162.2 $33,957 Gaston County 242,010 98.4% 97.6% 99.6% 680.3 $35,557 Gates County 10,299 96.2% 95.7% 36.8% 30.2 $31,342 Graham County 8,179 62.6% 61.5% 22.9% 28.0 $28,875 Granville County 61,544 80.1% 77.8% 65.2% 115.7 $33,166 Greene County 20,671 78.2% 67.4% 83.4% 77.5 $22,474 Guilford County 558,816 99.2% 98.5% 99.7% 865.1 $37,845 Halifax County 46,992 79.2% 73.8% 82.9% 64.9 $26,951 Harnett County 146,096 89.9% 88.9% 84.3% 245.6 $31,382 Haywood County 63,048 95.1% 93.4% 80.6% 113.9 $35,580 Henderson County 120,771 91.8% 91.0% 88.7% 323.8 $38,976 Hertford County 19,169 89.8% 88.8% 67.1% 54.3 $27,562 Hoke County 55,382 96.5% 94.8% 91.6% 141.9 $29,575 Hyde County 4,583 29.5% 25.4% 55.1% 7.5 $22,370 Iredell County 206,361 97.7% 97.1% 95.7% 359.3 $43,261 Jackson County 45,281 66.7% 64.5% 58.5% 92.2 $32,937 Johnston County 249,794 94.7% 92.6% 88.0% 315.4 $36,673 Jones County 9,462 94.5% 90.9% 55.8% 20.1 $28,699 Lee County 68,537 89.8% 88.2% 86.0% 268.7 $31,394 Lenoir County 55,332 93.3% 89.9% 80.8% 138.6 $28,409 Lincoln County 97,611 95.4% 93.3% 95.0% 329.9 $42,170 Macon County 38,717 57.1% 54.8% 46.1% 75.1 $35,682 Madison County 22,352 99.1% 99.1% 42.6% 49.7 $33,738 Martin County 21,523 66.9% 60.3% 67.2% 47.2 $27,007 McDowell County 45,269 84.6% 80.9% 63.3% 102.9 $29,555 Mecklenburg County 1,206,285 99.7% 99.1% 100.0% 303.8 $51,490 Mitchell County 15,030 93.9% 93.5% 54.7% 67.9 $32,713 Montgomery County 26,364 84.7% 83.2% 69.3% 53.6 $30,192 Moore County 108,417 92.5% 91.4% 70.6% 155.4 $44,318 Nash County 97,990 83.1% 80.7% 89.1% 181.3 $33,336 New Hanover County 243,333 99.4% 98.6% 99.9% 265.7 $46,083 Northampton County 16,580 83.9% 82.6% 50.6% 30.9 $31,883 Onslow County 212,954 98.7% 98.3% 86.0% 279.4 $30,998 Orange County 152,877 97.0% 95.5% 93.5% 384.5 $51,856 Pamlico County 12,550 87.1% 86.6% 54.7% 37.3 $35,042 Pasquotank County 41,418 94.2% 93.6% 86.3% 182.6 $32,707 Pender County 70,077 95.5% 94.5% 74.7% 80.4 $38,296 Perquimans County 13,460 93.1% 92.0% 69.8% 54.5 $33,626 Person County 40,143 84.3% 82.3% 60.2% 102.3 $37,616 Pitt County 180,783 95.1% 93.4% 96.1% 277.1 $34,229 Polk County 20,320 70.3% 64.0% 40.3% 85.5 $38,444 Randolph County 148,389 97.4% 96.4% 91.1% 189.7 $29,706 Richmond County 41,990 95.8% 95.0% 89.3% 88.6 $24,752 Robeson County 118,624 95.5% 93.9% 80.2% 125.2 $22,925 Rockingham County 93,517 96.5% 95.5% 74.9% 165.3 $31,380 Rowan County 153,384 96.3% 95.9% 98.4% 299.8 $32,675 Rutherford County 65,587 78.2% 74.8% 68.0% 116.0 $29,217 Sampson County 60,404 90.5% 88.2% 68.1% 63.9 $26,978 Scotland County 33,898 88.4% 87.3% 89.2% 106.2 $27,678 Stanly County 67,326 88.9% 86.1% 92.2% 170.4 $31,623 Stokes County 45,857 88.8% 88.0% 82.9% 102.1 $32,721 Surry County 71,547 98.8% 97.7% 75.5% 134.3 $31,947 Swain County 13,945 63.7% 59.8% 53.5% 26.4 $31,040 Transylvania County 34,103 88.3% 88.1% 50.2% 90.1 $38,899 Tyrrell County 3,517 68.7% 66.8% 47.5% 9.0 $22,294 Union County 263,386 97.1% 96.0% 97.9% 416.3 $45,355 Vance County 42,337 91.4% 89.9% 72.1% 167.7 $27,223 Wake County 1,232,444 99.2% 98.3% 99.8% 476.7 $52,949 Warren County 19,081 62.2% 60.6% 32.9% 44.4 $31,482 Washington County 10,654 79.2% 77.8% 63.3% 30.7 $28,150 Watauga County 54,997 98.3% 97.9% 69.4% 176.0 $32,631 Wayne County 120,338 93.8% 91.1% 96.7% 217.2 $31,216 Wilkes County 66,186 97.6% 96.9% 61.4% 87.8 $27,866 Wilson County 79,958 98.0% 97.0% 94.2% 217.5 $30,057 Yadkin County 37,995 98.8% 98.5% 91.2% 113.4 $33,789 Yancey County 18,993 95.5% 95.5% 51.5% 60.8 $34,699 North Dakota 796,568 100.0% 99.1% 94.2% 11.5 $42,474 Adams County 2,141 100.0% 100.0% 71.6% 2.2 $34,409 Barnes County 10,798 100.0% 100.0% 91.4% 7.2 $41,622 Benson County 5,756 100.0% 100.0% 81.9% 4.1 $27,568 Billings County 1,063 100.0% 100.0% 83.8% 0.9 $42,078 Bottineau County 6,391 100.0% 100.0% 87.2% 3.8 $48,356 Bowman County 2,886 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% 2.5 $40,067 Burke County 2,154 100.0% 100.0% 91.0% 2.0 $53,659 Burleigh County 103,107 99.9% 99.9% 98.0% 63.2 $44,873 Cass County 200,945 100.0% 98.0% 98.5% 113.9 $44,593 Cavalier County 3,567 100.0% 100.0% 87.3% 2.4 $45,550 Dickey County 4,930 100.0% 100.0% 91.5% 4.4 $40,260 Divide County 2,124 100.0% 100.0% 85.5% 1.7 $47,458 Dunn County 4,031 99.6% 99.6% 75.0% 2.0 $51,754 Eddy County 2,309 100.0% 100.0% 90.7% 3.7 $38,264 Emmons County 3,209 100.0% 100.0% 76.4% 2.1 $39,671 Foster County 3,323 100.0% 100.0% 93.2% 5.2 $43,724 Golden Valley County 1,795 100.0% 100.0% 92.1% 1.8 $36,292 Grand Forks County 73,771 100.0% 96.6% 98.1% 51.4 $39,597 Grant County 2,247 100.0% 100.0% 86.7% 1.4 $36,921 Griggs County 2,227 100.0% 100.0% 85.8% 3.1 $47,183 Hettinger County 2,419 100.0% 100.0% 86.7% 2.1 $43,990 Kidder County 2,371 100.0% 100.0% 69.9% 1.8 $35,003 LaMoure County 4,051 100.0% 100.0% 92.1% 3.5 $41,792 Logan County 1,880 100.0% 100.0% 81.2% 1.9 $33,030 McHenry County 5,135 100.0% 100.0% 85.8% 2.7 $41,087 McIntosh County 2,461 100.0% 100.0% 75.3% 2.5 $36,646 McKenzie County 14,782 100.0% 100.0% 84.8% 5.4 $48,665 McLean County 9,845 98.9% 98.9% 88.5% 4.7 $42,526 Mercer County 8,348 100.0% 100.0% 92.2% 8.0 $40,062 Morton County 34,194 99.9% 99.9% 96.2% 17.8 $45,337 Mountrail County 9,474 99.6% 99.6% 92.7% 5.2 $41,281 Nelson County 3,007 100.0% 100.0% 87.2% 3.1 $38,484 Oliver County 1,882 100.0% 100.0% 76.7% 2.6 $41,155 Pembina County 6,588 100.0% 100.0% 70.5% 5.9 $41,314 Pierce County 3,853 100.0% 100.0% 82.9% 3.8 $40,194 Ramsey County 11,510 100.0% 100.0% 93.8% 9.7 $37,577 Ransom County 5,590 100.0% 99.9% 91.6% 6.5 $38,775 Renville County 2,376 100.0% 100.0% 90.4% 2.7 $38,289 Richland County 16,658 100.0% 99.9% 87.9% 11.6 $40,184 Rolette County 11,692 100.0% 100.0% 83.7% 12.9 $25,606 Sargent County 3,710 100.0% 100.0% 86.0% 4.3 $44,694 Sheridan County 1,268 100.0% 100.0% 79.9% 1.3 $41,246 Sioux County 3,713 99.2% 99.2% 48.0% 3.4 $19,102 Slope County 660 99.8% 99.8% 60.9% 0.5 $44,034 Stark County 33,767 100.0% 100.0% 96.7% 25.3 $40,640 Steele County 1,767 100.0% 88.0% 78.2% 2.5 $41,390 Stutsman County 21,546 100.0% 100.0% 94.5% 9.7 $40,216 Towner County 2,051 100.0% 100.0% 91.5% 2.0 $36,218 Traill County 7,989 100.0% 99.3% 96.5% 9.3 $43,803 Walsh County 10,214 100.0% 99.6% 87.6% 8.0 $37,524 Ward County 68,427 100.0% 100.0% 95.9% 34.0 $42,299 Wells County 3,803 100.0% 100.0% 81.6% 3.0 $42,252 Williams County 40,763 100.0% 100.0% 94.7% 19.6 $45,793 Ohio 11,883,302 96.9% 93.6% 97.6% 290.8 $39,455 Adams County 27,671 62.2% 52.5% 81.7% 47.4 $25,484 Allen County 100,866 99.2% 90.5% 98.7% 250.6 $33,382 Ashland County 52,420 88.8% 85.8% 96.5% 123.9 $32,097 Ashtabula County 96,906 89.0% 85.4% 93.5% 138.0 $30,768 Athens County 63,218 82.9% 77.7% 85.6% 125.5 $29,474 Auglaize County 45,922 98.2% 84.5% 97.3% 114.4 $37,573 Belmont County 64,692 94.2% 91.9% 91.6% 121.6 $31,496 Brown County 44,292 81.7% 71.6% 94.3% 90.5 $33,717 Butler County 399,542 99.6% 98.5% 99.5% 856.4 $39,425 Carroll County 26,460 82.5% 69.9% 91.0% 67.1 $35,429 Champaign County 38,907 94.3% 70.8% 94.5% 90.7 $35,326 Clark County 134,985 98.5% 97.0% 99.7% 340.1 $32,421 Clermont County 214,123 98.8% 98.2% 98.3% 473.1 $43,473 Clinton County 42,019 89.6% 84.2% 96.8% 102.8 $34,046 Columbiana County 99,823 90.9% 80.4% 95.4% 187.7 $32,265 Coshocton County 37,003 81.2% 74.0% 76.1% 65.6 $28,306 Crawford County 41,626 95.1% 81.2% 94.2% 103.6 $31,729 Cuyahoga County 1,240,594 99.9% 99.5% 100.0% 713.4 $41,559 Darke County 51,462 94.5% 76.2% 90.7% 86.0 $34,446 Defiance County 38,644 100.0% 90.7% 94.4% 93.9 $35,076 Delaware County 237,966 98.9% 97.7% 98.9% 537.0 $59,581 Erie County 73,841 98.8% 95.9% 99.3% 293.8 $39,579 Fairfield County 167,762 94.7% 92.4% 97.8% 332.6 $40,561 Fayette County 28,782 89.4% 83.6% 97.0% 70.8 $31,573 Franklin County 1,356,301 99.7% 99.5% 100.0% 547.4 $42,855 Fulton County 42,028 99.8% 77.5% 98.8% 103.7 $37,936 Gallia County 28,886 48.5% 39.9% 78.9% 61.9 $30,683 Geauga County 95,362 89.8% 85.7% 97.8% 238.2 $50,431 Greene County 172,347 97.6% 95.9% 99.8% 416.7 $44,385 Guernsey County 38,219 90.0% 84.5% 80.3% 73.2 $32,089 Hamilton County 837,359 99.7% 99.6% 99.9% 65.5 $44,328 Hancock County 75,016 99.9% 91.3% 97.8% 141.2 $39,313 Hardin County 30,402 99.9% 88.7% 93.4% 64.6 $29,509 Harrison County 14,042 67.8% 53.3% 73.9% 34.9 $31,219 Henry County 27,536 100.0% 74.9% 95.8% 66.2 $40,050 Highland County 43,785 87.3% 83.1% 93.9% 79.2 $29,794 Hocking County 27,429 64.2% 59.8% 68.5% 65.1 $32,104 Holmes County 44,668 66.0% 46.2% 86.1% 105.7 $30,501 Huron County 58,168 94.3% 85.1% 96.7% 118.2 $32,660 Jackson County 32,723 84.8% 79.8% 83.0% 77.9 $29,773 Jefferson County 63,900 93.6% 91.1% 92.5% 156.6 $31,646 Knox County 63,848 92.2% 77.7% 87.0% 121.5 $34,636 Lake County 232,360 99.9% 99.7% 100.0% 13.5 $43,197 Lawrence County 55,829 87.2% 86.0% 86.1% 123.1 $29,610 Licking County 184,898 95.4% 91.8% 95.6% 270.9 $41,543 Logan County 46,085 98.2% 76.7% 96.6% 100.5 $37,613 Lorain County 322,030 99.7% 99.5% 99.7% 656.5 $39,638 Lucas County 426,291 99.4% 98.5% 99.8% 255.0 $36,289 Madison County 45,531 86.2% 78.7% 99.5% 97.7 $36,265 Mahoning County 225,786 98.5% 97.8% 99.3% 548.7 $33,850 Marion County 64,976 98.5% 80.6% 96.1% 160.9 $30,491 Medina County 184,625 99.7% 99.4% 99.9% 438.1 $46,652 Meigs County 21,491 61.5% 45.9% 63.2% 50.0 $25,684 Mercer County 42,648 99.7% 87.4% 96.1% 92.2 $35,087 Miami County 111,950 98.1% 93.8% 98.3% 275.4 $39,046 Monroe County 13,051 74.8% 64.8% 63.3% 28.6 $33,856 Montgomery County 537,443 99.5% 98.2% 99.9% 164.9 $37,320 Morgan County 13,532 66.3% 59.8% 61.4% 32.5 $29,431 Morrow County 35,927 95.9% 83.8% 93.0% 88.5 $34,777 Muskingum County 86,582 95.9% 94.0% 90.9% 130.3 $31,418 Noble County 14,269 93.7% 72.3% 74.9% 35.9 $30,514 Ottawa County 39,692 99.5% 87.6% 97.8% 155.8 $47,629 Paulding County 18,755 100.0% 78.0% 87.8% 45.0 $35,657 Perry County 35,682 71.8% 57.7% 88.3% 87.5 $30,185 Pickaway County 62,158 82.8% 79.0% 95.8% 124.0 $34,645 Pike County 27,065 78.2% 73.4% 73.7% 61.5 $31,082 Portage County 163,839 98.9% 98.0% 98.9% 336.1 $39,041 Preble County 40,801 92.2% 77.7% 96.7% 96.2 $35,232 Putnam County 34,206 100.0% 63.2% 93.6% 70.9 $38,660 Richland County 124,853 97.4% 90.5% 96.0% 252.1 $30,380 Ross County 76,046 82.5% 78.1% 87.9% 110.3 $31,013 Sandusky County 58,866 99.1% 85.3% 99.6% 144.2 $34,573 Scioto County 71,798 90.7% 87.9% 82.2% 117.7 $27,362 Seneca County 54,730 97.2% 86.4% 95.3% 99.3 $32,716 Shelby County 47,952 98.0% 82.0% 97.3% 117.6 $36,711 Stark County 374,091 98.4% 96.7% 99.8% 650.3 $35,802 Summit County 538,370 99.7% 99.4% 100.0% 304.2 $42,749 Trumbull County 200,300 96.5% 95.5% 97.9% 324.1 $31,807 Tuscarawas County 92,048 92.1% 85.2% 91.7% 162.2 $32,489 Union County 71,721 95.4% 81.9% 97.4% 166.1 $49,946 Van Wert County 28,887 99.9% 74.2% 98.0% 70.6 $33,106 Vinton County 12,545 56.1% 45.5% 56.1% 30.4 $29,354 Warren County 256,059 99.1% 98.1% 99.2% 637.9 $52,477 Washington County 58,332 78.1% 74.1% 83.1% 92.3 $35,444 Wayne County 116,632 96.1% 91.2% 99.0% 210.2 $33,874 Williams County 36,554 100.0% 69.6% 97.4% 86.9 $32,421 Wood County 133,077 99.9% 93.0% 99.4% 215.6 $41,929 Wyandot County 21,394 99.6% 74.1% 90.0% 52.6 $35,197 Oklahoma 4,095,389 95.8% 86.7% 95.5% 59.7 $34,859 Adair County 19,821 99.9% 99.9% 69.8% 34.5 $22,115 Alfalfa County 5,712 95.5% 57.8% 92.9% 6.6 $29,173 Atoka County 14,600 59.3% 23.3% 79.5% 15.0 $25,392 Beaver County 5,025 89.9% 89.7% 56.1% 2.8 $30,136 Beckham County 22,248 95.4% 73.7% 98.1% 24.7 $26,675 Blaine County 8,573 90.0% 82.5% 83.0% 9.2 $30,319 Bryan County 50,305 92.7% 61.6% 89.2% 55.6 $28,998 Caddo County 26,337 93.6% 74.4% 90.9% 20.6 $25,741 Canadian County 181,760 99.7% 86.1% 99.4% 202.7 $37,984 Carter County 49,135 98.2% 69.4% 92.3% 59.8 $32,628 Cherokee County 48,729 99.1% 98.9% 88.6% 65.0 $30,080 Choctaw County 14,174 66.4% 45.2% 71.8% 18.4 $26,272 Cimarron County 2,133 90.1% 89.9% 81.2% 1.2 $35,550 Cleveland County 303,952 97.5% 95.4% 98.3% 564.0 $38,544 Coal County 5,414 82.6% 38.4% 79.1% 10.5 $27,073 Comanche County 121,396 96.9% 86.6% 99.6% 113.5 $30,670 Cotton County 5,503 97.7% 61.8% 96.7% 8.7 $32,744 Craig County 14,506 98.4% 77.8% 88.7% 19.1 $26,443 Creek County 73,971 93.3% 82.0% 95.2% 77.9 $31,986 Custer County 28,266 97.8% 88.9% 98.6% 28.6 $31,487 Delaware County 41,771 83.9% 80.3% 82.0% 56.6 $35,376 Dewey County 4,268 79.4% 55.8% 86.6% 4.3 $30,044 Ellis County 3,601 79.6% 56.1% 67.3% 2.9 $31,354 Garfield County 62,007 99.9% 89.3% 98.3% 58.6 $33,818 Garvin County 26,149 86.9% 62.0% 93.1% 32.6 $30,253 Grady County 58,353 97.0% 86.6% 96.5% 53.0 $36,380 Grant County 4,123 98.0% 52.2% 86.4% 4.1 $33,181 Greer County 5,433 95.4% 67.5% 94.1% 8.5 $25,141 Harmon County 2,315 18.1% 3.3% 92.2% 4.3 $31,601 Harper County 3,209 84.7% 53.9% 88.9% 3.1 $27,360 Haskell County 11,811 95.0% 94.8% 75.1% 20.5 $27,045 Hughes County 13,371 71.2% 47.0% 86.2% 16.6 $20,300 Jackson County 24,541 97.9% 80.6% 96.0% 30.6 $32,371 Jefferson County 5,374 95.4% 48.4% 93.2% 7.1 $30,984 Johnston County 10,293 72.0% 44.5% 86.7% 16.0 $25,352 Kay County 43,437 99.0% 88.0% 98.7% 47.2 $31,190 Kingfisher County 15,820 97.7% 91.2% 97.1% 17.6 $37,251 Kiowa County 8,257 97.1% 74.8% 96.2% 8.1 $24,928 Latimer County 9,509 53.8% 49.7% 65.1% 13.2 $24,934 Le Flore County 49,854 81.2% 62.7% 82.7% 31.4 $24,847 Lincoln County 34,972 97.5% 91.7% 89.7% 36.7 $31,303 Logan County 53,860 99.1% 76.6% 96.0% 72.4 $39,863 Love County 10,423 89.6% 29.4% 90.6% 20.3 $31,136 Major County 7,569 97.4% 80.1% 87.8% 7.9 $34,641 Marshall County 16,147 87.6% 45.2% 94.8% 43.5 $27,759 Mayes County 40,144 93.0% 83.0% 91.1% 61.3 $30,528 McClain County 48,434 96.3% 88.7% 96.5% 84.9 $39,352 McCurtain County 30,805 86.1% 85.9% 54.3% 16.6 $25,818 McIntosh County 19,710 87.3% 85.4% 86.3% 31.9 $27,068 Murray County 13,754 95.1% 75.3% 90.7% 33.0 $33,997 Muskogee County 66,752 94.3% 92.2% 95.6% 82.3 $27,090 Noble County 10,896 97.7% 70.8% 86.2% 14.9 $33,482 Nowata County 9,561 82.6% 47.9% 87.2% 16.9 $30,575 Okfuskee County 11,364 87.2% 79.0% 85.1% 18.4 $24,325 Oklahoma County 816,485 99.2% 95.5% 99.8% 151.8 $38,438 Okmulgee County 37,084 95.1% 91.7% 88.8% 53.2 $28,980 Osage County 46,495 80.9% 60.8% 91.6% 20.7 $32,096 Ottawa County 30,405 97.9% 92.9% 89.5% 64.6 $24,911 Pawnee County 16,111 80.4% 58.2% 92.1% 28.3 $28,961 Payne County 84,199 98.5% 85.9% 95.4% 122.9 $28,980 Pittsburg County 43,395 80.9% 67.8% 87.9% 33.2 $29,823 Pontotoc County 38,310 92.4% 68.8% 90.5% 53.2 $32,176 Pottawatomie County 74,446 98.4% 93.6% 94.3% 94.5 $29,013 Pushmataha County 10,800 69.4% 52.5% 57.2% 7.7 $25,596 Roger Mills County 3,304 53.6% 32.2% 79.4% 2.9 $44,404 Rogers County 101,371 93.9% 68.2% 97.8% 150.0 $38,122 Seminole County 23,351 87.8% 72.3% 89.3% 36.9 $24,102 Sequoyah County 40,555 96.4% 95.4% 84.4% 60.2 $25,683 Stephens County 44,075 93.7% 70.3% 95.2% 50.6 $34,244 Texas County 20,577 100.0% 100.0% 94.6% 10.1 $25,716 Tillman County 6,736 97.6% 75.5% 93.6% 7.7 $26,396 Tulsa County 693,514 98.9% 96.7% 99.8% 216.2 $39,673 Wagoner County 91,257 96.4% 90.0% 97.3% 162.4 $36,851 Washington County 54,060 92.7% 83.8% 97.4% 130.1 $34,969 Washita County 10,839 95.5% 60.4% 95.5% 10.8 $32,254 Woods County 8,582 97.0% 67.7% 94.6% 6.7 $29,460 Woodward County 19,991 94.1% 82.8% 96.4% 16.1 $35,404 Oregon 4,272,371 95.4% 92.7% 95.6% 44.5 $44,063 Baker County 16,750 85.6% 75.8% 84.6% 5.5 $35,829 Benton County 98,899 93.4% 89.5% 95.7% 146.5 $42,112 Clackamas County 425,857 96.3% 95.2% 96.9% 227.6 $51,666 Clatsop County 41,043 96.0% 94.8% 90.4% 49.6 $40,991 Columbia County 54,063 78.8% 76.9% 86.9% 82.1 $39,526 Coos County 64,326 89.3% 87.6% 84.9% 40.3 $35,153 Crook County 27,336 63.8% 59.6% 89.0% 9.2 $41,804 Curry County 22,774 99.1% 99.1% 76.5% 14.0 $40,421 Deschutes County 211,535 93.5% 91.6% 94.8% 70.1 $50,150 Douglas County 112,255 97.6% 97.3% 86.8% 22.3 $33,510 Gilliam County 1,971 41.6% 39.7% 86.0% 1.6 $34,999 Grant County 7,093 84.2% 83.2% 50.1% 1.6 $34,924 Harney County 7,402 70.8% 65.8% 81.2% 0.7 $27,919 Hood River County 23,764 96.4% 96.4% 96.4% 45.5 $46,105 Jackson County 221,331 96.7% 92.6% 94.8% 79.5 $38,797 Jefferson County 25,536 77.7% 65.5% 95.3% 14.3 $32,299 Josephine County 88,276 92.7% 91.0% 88.7% 53.9 $34,176 Klamath County 70,438 94.4% 84.6% 91.1% 11.8 $32,939 Lake County 8,194 60.1% 41.8% 79.2% 1.0 $32,783 Lane County 382,396 95.6% 93.8% 94.4% 84.0 $38,563 Lincoln County 51,212 90.2% 89.9% 87.7% 52.2 $37,265 Linn County 132,474 94.4% 89.7% 95.3% 57.9 $34,422 Malheur County 32,315 91.4% 60.5% 94.4% 3.3 $23,814 Marion County 352,867 96.6% 94.1% 98.8% 298.8 $35,452 Morrow County 12,360 72.4% 49.0% 92.4% 6.1 $30,787 Multnomah County 795,897 99.6% 99.3% 99.8% 845.9 $52,354 Polk County 90,549 96.8% 91.3% 96.7% 122.2 $39,423 Sherman County 2,002 53.8% 41.9% 54.9% 2.4 $33,190 Tillamook County 27,264 91.2% 90.6% 79.2% 24.7 $37,336 Umatilla County 80,491 92.9% 84.5% 95.6% 25.0 $31,371 Union County 26,058 81.6% 73.2% 89.0% 12.8 $34,745 Wallowa County 7,522 64.6% 63.4% 46.2% 2.4 $37,963 Wasco County 26,507 82.3% 80.1% 86.7% 11.1 $36,582 Washington County 611,272 98.3% 97.2% 99.0% 844.0 $52,136 Wheeler County 1,456 49.0% 41.7% 38.6% 0.8 $33,337 Yamhill County 110,886 92.2% 81.7% 95.6% 154.9 $40,615 Pennsylvania 13,078,747 97.3% 96.1% 96.1% 292.3 $43,104 Adams County 107,914 94.3% 91.4% 96.5% 208.1 $39,339 Allegheny County 1,231,813 99.9% 99.9% 99.5% 687.5 $48,208 Armstrong County 63,679 89.8% 87.6% 84.2% 97.5 $35,313 Beaver County 165,540 98.6% 98.1% 98.1% 380.8 $39,805 Bedford County 47,643 82.2% 69.1% 71.0% 47.1 $32,550 Berks County 439,116 97.7% 97.0% 99.2% 512.7 $39,012 Blair County 120,269 97.5% 94.6% 96.0% 229.0 $34,593 Bradford County 59,699 89.8% 88.5% 65.1% 52.0 $35,298 Bucks County 650,131 99.7% 99.6% 99.4% 75.7 $56,824 Butler County 199,341 96.4% 95.6% 92.5% 252.5 $47,658 Cambria County 130,108 95.3% 93.0% 93.5% 189.2 $33,863 Cameron County 4,348 94.3% 94.1% 71.9% 11.0 $29,242 Carbon County 65,743 99.2% 99.0% 93.0% 172.4 $36,380 Centre County 159,805 93.2% 90.1% 95.1% 144.1 $38,732 Chester County 560,745 99.5% 99.2% 97.9% 747.1 $63,089 Clarion County 36,855 86.2% 83.5% 66.0% 61.3 $32,498 Clearfield County 78,132 85.4% 82.5% 87.3% 68.2 $32,502 Clinton County 37,865 92.7% 87.0% 82.1% 42.6 $31,762 Columbia County 66,012 87.5% 81.5% 90.9% 136.6 $32,432 Crawford County 82,089 83.3% 81.2% 84.8% 81.1 $31,919 Cumberland County 275,516 98.8% 97.3% 99.0% 505.1 $45,365 Dauphin County 293,029 99.6% 99.2% 99.4% 558.3 $41,055 Delaware County 584,882 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 181.9 $48,676 Elk County 30,124 92.9% 91.1% 88.4% 36.4 $35,683 Erie County 267,750 96.9% 96.0% 97.3% 335.1 $34,285 Fayette County 123,941 96.2% 95.0% 92.8% 156.7 $32,278 Forest County 6,601 71.3% 52.5% 73.7% 15.4 $23,033 Franklin County 159,285 94.6% 90.2% 94.3% 206.2 $39,149 Fulton County 14,452 82.5% 51.5% 76.5% 33.0 $36,413 Greene County 33,960 83.5% 80.7% 72.8% 59.0 $33,316 Huntingdon County 43,359 85.2% 76.0% 78.0% 49.6 $32,158 Indiana County 82,953 80.0% 75.9% 80.1% 100.3 $31,524 Jefferson County 43,367 83.8% 80.8% 81.4% 66.5 $31,091 Juniata County 23,395 71.0% 53.4% 75.1% 59.8 $32,025 Lackawanna County 216,859 99.5% 99.1% 97.2% 472.4 $36,217 Lancaster County 563,293 98.7% 97.1% 99.4% 596.8 $41,319 Lawrence County 84,233 95.9% 94.2% 97.5% 235.7 $34,283 Lebanon County 145,319 99.1% 97.3% 99.4% 401.6 $37,701 Lehigh County 385,655 98.7% 98.4% 99.6% 116.8 $41,804 Luzerne County 331,379 97.6% 97.1% 94.6% 372.5 $34,857 Lycoming County 113,236 93.1% 89.4% 89.4% 92.1 $34,853 McKean County 39,478 89.8% 84.2% 82.5% 40.3 $32,353 Mercer County 108,140 89.6% 87.2% 94.1% 160.8 $33,320 Mifflin County 45,935 94.2% 82.0% 86.3% 111.8 $30,357 Monroe County 166,523 99.2% 98.9% 86.5% 273.7 $37,512 Montgomery County 879,188 99.6% 99.5% 99.8% 820.4 $60,507 Montour County 18,115 91.8% 78.8% 97.5% 139.1 $45,274 Northampton County 322,989 99.0% 98.5% 99.4% 873.4 $44,837 Northumberland County 90,027 96.1% 91.7% 95.9% 196.7 $32,241 Perry County 46,816 86.7% 73.3% 78.6% 84.9 $38,594 Philadelphia County 1,573,916 99.9% 99.8% 100.0% 714.5 $37,669 Pike County 62,376 97.3% 96.8% 60.6% 114.5 $42,243 Potter County 15,993 97.6% 97.3% 44.6% 14.8 $31,841 Schuylkill County 144,523 94.1% 91.2% 95.1% 185.6 $33,769 Snyder County 39,627 86.3% 71.4% 86.4% 120.5 $32,361 Somerset County 72,134 85.9% 80.7% 87.5% 67.1 $31,736 Sullivan County 5,927 54.0% 50.6% 43.7% 13.2 $38,338 Susquehanna County 38,100 89.4% 88.7% 69.7% 46.3 $39,044 Tioga County 40,698 90.8% 88.7% 56.6% 35.9 $32,785 Union County 42,159 94.3% 80.1% 91.4% 133.4 $36,765 Venango County 49,476 87.0% 84.1% 80.9% 73.4 $33,044 Warren County 37,373 72.7% 62.5% 80.7% 42.3 $33,333 Washington County 210,434 96.4% 95.0% 94.7% 245.5 $44,392 Wayne County 51,419 93.4% 87.0% 69.6% 70.8 $33,735 Westmoreland County 350,935 98.4% 97.6% 97.5% 341.5 $42,132 Wyoming County 25,771 93.9% 92.0% 65.5% 64.9 $39,484 York County 471,240 97.7% 96.4% 99.3% 521.1 $40,530 Puerto Rico 3,203,295 99.0% 91.0% 97.1% 935.5 $16,794 Adjuntas Municipio 17,981 93.1% 76.3% 75.3% 269.6 $9,457 Aguada Municipio 37,523 99.6% 98.1% 98.5% 216.0 $12,509 Aguadilla Municipio 53,557 100.0% 98.0% 98.4% 466.0 $13,785 Aguas Buenas Municipio 23,125 95.1% 79.7% 96.9% 768.7 $14,407 Aibonito Municipio 24,751 100.0% 87.2% 96.6% 790.5 $13,689 Arecibo Municipio 85,971 99.9% 93.0% 92.4% 682.6 $14,219 Arroyo Municipio 14,944 100.0% 88.9% 96.6% 995.7 $13,707 Añasco Municipio 24,689 96.9% 93.5% 95.7% 628.5 $13,873 Barceloneta Municipio 22,413 99.8% 98.6% 88.0% 198.8 $14,312 Barranquitas Municipio 29,281 99.9% 37.1% 98.8% 854.9 $12,989 Bayamón Municipio 181,152 99.9% 93.6% 99.5% 82.3 $18,125 Cabo Rojo Municipio 46,820 98.9% 97.1% 98.5% 665.4 $15,883 Caguas Municipio 124,628 100.0% 94.4% 99.2% 126.6 $20,696 Camuy Municipio 32,765 94.9% 93.6% 94.9% 706.8 $14,617 Canóvanas Municipio 41,512 99.6% 97.9% 98.9% 263.0 $18,153 Carolina Municipio 150,679 99.8% 93.1% 98.2% 320.9 $20,747 Cataño Municipio 21,971 100.0% 80.6% 97.7% 546.7 $15,583 Cayey Municipio 40,389 100.0% 83.4% 97.7% 777.7 $18,126 Ceiba Municipio 10,783 95.3% 93.7% 97.6% 371.4 $14,428 Ciales Municipio 16,698 98.6% 85.2% 90.2% 251.0 $9,927 Cidra Municipio 39,478 99.3% 81.7% 99.7% 95.9 $15,571 Coamo Municipio 33,514 100.0% 89.5% 93.3% 429.6 $12,686 Comerío Municipio 18,613 99.0% 89.8% 98.9% 655.4 $10,954 Corozal Municipio 34,476 99.9% 93.6% 98.3% 809.9 $12,491 Culebra Municipio 1,759 94.7% 0.1% 93.4% 151.0 $18,319 Dorado Municipio 35,867 100.0% 96.6% 99.9% 551.6 $22,517 Fajardo Municipio 31,043 99.4% 98.0% 99.5% 38.1 $16,001 Florida Municipio 11,425 94.6% 92.3% 93.5% 751.2 $11,186 Guayama Municipio 34,386 100.0% 88.7% 96.0% 528.7 $12,927 Guayanilla Municipio 16,628 95.9% 92.8% 92.3% 393.4 $11,462 Guaynabo Municipio 89,405 99.9% 96.2% 99.7% 241.1 $31,718 Gurabo Municipio 40,039 99.2% 85.2% 99.7% 435.9 $25,058 Guánica Municipio 12,117 99.1% 97.9% 99.5% 327.0 $9,705 Hatillo Municipio 38,034 97.6% 97.1% 95.5% 910.4 $15,314 Hormigueros Municipio 15,290 99.7% 98.4% 98.9% 347.7 $15,222 Humacao Municipio 49,616 99.8% 96.9% 97.4% 109.5 $16,423 Isabela Municipio 43,033 98.3% 95.2% 98.1% 778.0 $12,925 Jayuya Municipio 14,440 99.8% 94.2% 74.7% 324.3 $9,779 Juana Díaz Municipio 46,045 100.0% 91.0% 93.4% 763.9 $12,698 Juncos Municipio 36,796 99.7% 92.6% 99.5% 389.0 $15,368 Lajas Municipio 22,888 99.9% 96.2% 98.0% 381.7 $10,924 Lares Municipio 27,734 94.8% 87.7% 91.8% 451.3 $10,871 Las Marías Municipio 8,674 83.3% 72.5% 89.2% 187.1 $9,744 Las Piedras Municipio 34,890 93.9% 78.4% 96.6% 29.8 $15,683 Loíza Municipio 22,047 100.0% 91.8% 99.4% 137.9 $12,788 Luquillo Municipio 17,387 98.8% 96.2% 98.9% 673.6 $14,463 Manatí Municipio 38,637 99.6% 96.6% 94.8% 855.9 $14,330 Maricao Municipio 4,486 80.2% 60.7% 76.3% 122.5 $10,659 Maunabo Municipio 10,248 100.0% 93.9% 98.4% 484.2 $10,951 Mayagüez Municipio 69,044 98.8% 88.7% 98.6% 888.9 $14,394 Moca Municipio 37,543 98.6% 95.1% 95.2% 745.8 $14,506 Morovis Municipio 28,230 99.7% 95.1% 97.5% 726.2 $12,646 Naguabo Municipio 22,820 91.6% 83.9% 97.3% 441.7 $12,016 Naranjito Municipio 29,516 99.6% 90.0% 99.1% 77.2 $11,970 Orocovis Municipio 21,260 99.8% 70.5% 91.4% 334.1 $10,068 Patillas Municipio 15,216 99.9% 90.1% 83.7% 326.5 $12,412 Peñuelas Municipio 19,453 94.0% 90.2% 95.9% 436.0 $12,235 Ponce Municipio 129,659 99.9% 87.9% 93.9% 128.1 $14,020 Quebradillas Municipio 23,301 97.6% 96.9% 95.2% 27.3 $12,345 Rincón Municipio 15,625 98.8% 96.7% 95.5% 93.6 $15,831 Río Grande Municipio 45,297 99.8% 99.2% 98.0% 747.2 $15,109 Sabana Grande Municipio 22,183 94.3% 88.5% 97.1% 610.9 $14,001 Salinas Municipio 24,504 100.0% 93.8% 98.5% 353.1 $12,533 San Germán Municipio 30,980 98.0% 93.9% 94.1% 568.5 $12,371 San Juan Municipio 332,454 100.0% 91.7% 99.9% 942.3 $24,332 San Lorenzo Municipio 37,363 96.0% 89.5% 97.2% 703.5 $13,440 San Sebastián Municipio 38,999 98.0% 94.7% 96.6% 553.8 $11,827 Santa Isabel Municipio 19,651 100.0% 88.4% 99.2% 577.4 $15,896 Toa Alta Municipio 66,100 99.9% 92.2% 99.3% 446.6 $18,128 Toa Baja Municipio 71,332 100.0% 91.8% 100.0% 68.8 $17,390 Trujillo Alto Municipio 66,816 100.0% 94.6% 99.8% 218.8 $21,652 Utuado Municipio 27,155 97.7% 92.6% 85.7% 239.2 $10,916 Vega Alta Municipio 34,658 99.4% 90.1% 98.8% 249.9 $17,637 Vega Baja Municipio 53,709 99.1% 94.9% 99.3% 171.5 $15,647 Vieques Municipio 7,966 97.9% 75.1% 96.2% 156.8 $9,346 Villalba Municipio 21,197 100.0% 80.5% 91.4% 594.8 $13,451 Yabucoa Municipio 28,580 95.2% 51.2% 96.4% 517.6 $11,901 Yauco Municipio 32,057 92.5% 88.7% 93.1% 473.4 $12,939 Rhode Island 1,112,308 99.1% 98.5% 97.0% 75.8 $45,919 Bristol County 50,145 99.8% 99.8% 98.8% 78.0 $58,817 Kent County 172,450 99.6% 99.4% 96.5% 23.0 $49,243 Newport County 83,468 97.7% 96.8% 95.7% 814.9 $60,920 Providence County 675,912 99.2% 98.6% 97.8% 650.7 $40,689 Washington County 130,333 98.2% 97.3% 93.5% 395.8 $53,226 South Carolina 5,478,828 97.7% 96.9% 94.0% 182.2 $37,993 Abbeville County 24,607 99.4% 99.4% 73.9% 50.1 $30,650 Aiken County 179,243 99.7% 99.5% 97.0% 167.4 $36,627 Allendale County 7,551 96.5% 96.2% 77.6% 18.5 $23,057 Anderson County 217,183 98.3% 97.2% 97.3% 304.2 $34,923 Bamberg County 12,870 97.5% 96.5% 83.7% 32.7 $22,182 Barnwell County 20,495 94.6% 94.1% 81.4% 37.4 $26,141 Beaufort County 201,775 95.2% 93.5% 94.8% 350.3 $51,657 Berkeley County 264,275 96.7% 96.2% 93.6% 239.5 $39,727 Calhoun County 14,249 99.7% 99.6% 75.1% 37.4 $32,567 Charleston County 431,001 98.7% 98.4% 98.0% 469.5 $54,769 Cherokee County 57,770 94.7% 93.6% 86.1% 147.0 $27,175 Chester County 32,323 82.6% 80.0% 69.1% 55.7 $27,656 Chesterfield County 44,488 98.0% 97.6% 65.3% 55.7 $28,363 Clarendon County 31,030 98.0% 97.8% 79.4% 51.1 $28,289 Colleton County 39,259 99.8% 99.8% 75.9% 37.2 $27,859 Darlington County 62,425 96.5% 94.3% 92.2% 111.4 $30,281 Dillon County 27,577 96.4% 93.9% 77.7% 68.1 $23,016 Dorchester County 174,663 98.0% 97.6% 96.8% 307.2 $37,279 Edgefield County 29,455 86.9% 84.1% 72.6% 58.8 $32,802 Fairfield County 20,369 84.4% 80.7% 68.8% 29.7 $32,111 Florence County 138,049 97.8% 96.0% 93.1% 172.5 $31,803 Georgetown County 66,035 99.7% 99.6% 81.8% 81.2 $43,928 Greenville County 570,745 98.3% 97.4% 99.3% 726.2 $42,299 Greenwood County 70,041 98.3% 97.8% 89.1% 153.7 $31,018 Hampton County 18,172 97.7% 97.5% 69.8% 32.5 $25,082 Horry County 413,391 99.9% 99.8% 96.2% 364.8 $36,572 Jasper County 35,618 94.4% 94.0% 75.9% 54.4 $32,505 Kershaw County 71,698 97.6% 96.7% 83.8% 98.7 $34,250 Lancaster County 111,652 98.2% 98.1% 90.6% 203.3 $41,492 Laurens County 70,545 97.0% 95.9% 86.2% 99.0 $28,728 Lee County 15,958 95.0% 93.7% 78.4% 38.9 $24,133 Lexington County 313,774 99.5% 99.0% 99.0% 448.9 $38,807 Marion County 28,368 98.3% 97.1% 84.4% 58.0 $22,676 Marlboro County 25,498 99.7% 99.6% 77.8% 53.1 $22,016 McCormick County 9,983 99.5% 99.5% 55.5% 27.8 $33,437 Newberry County 39,203 95.8% 95.3% 83.8% 62.2 $33,073 Oconee County 82,475 96.0% 94.8% 84.3% 131.6 $37,575 Orangeburg County 83,129 94.7% 92.3% 84.0% 75.1 $25,682 Pickens County 138,207 95.3% 94.2% 97.3% 278.1 $33,075 Richland County 430,651 98.3% 97.3% 99.6% 568.7 $37,190 Saluda County 19,452 86.5% 82.5% 72.8% 43.0 $29,590 Spartanburg County 369,256 96.5% 94.5% 98.8% 456.8 $33,427 Sumter County 104,776 98.9% 98.6% 95.9% 157.5 $29,372 Union County 26,678 95.4% 94.7% 85.5% 51.9 $26,723 Williamsburg County 29,865 93.7% 93.1% 79.9% 32.0 $24,533 York County 303,001 99.0% 98.7% 97.9% 444.9 $43,442 South Dakota 924,669 96.4% 95.1% 93.3% 12.2 $38,880 Aurora County 2,752 99.8% 99.8% 84.2% 3.9 $43,275 Beadle County 19,459 100.0% 99.8% 96.7% 15.5 $31,506 Bennett County 3,289 72.8% 72.8% 85.5% 2.8 $21,005 Bon Homme County 7,071 97.0% 93.9% 94.6% 12.5 $28,003 Brookings County 36,359 99.9% 99.8% 98.3% 45.9 $34,769 Brown County 37,495 99.4% 99.3% 92.9% 21.9 $39,599 Brule County 5,261 99.5% 99.3% 80.5% 6.4 $36,063 Buffalo County 1,825 99.9% 99.9% 92.2% 3.9 $17,408 Butte County 10,891 95.4% 83.1% 90.3% 4.8 $36,097 Campbell County 1,342 100.0% 100.0% 65.7% 1.8 $42,435 Charles Mix County 9,343 90.7% 86.5% 78.4% 8.5 $29,095 Clark County 3,974 99.9% 98.2% 79.0% 4.2 $34,133 Clay County 15,245 98.0% 96.0% 99.0% 37.0 $29,412 Codington County 29,278 100.0% 99.4% 99.0% 42.6 $37,308 Corson County 3,747 88.2% 88.2% 53.8% 1.5 $20,743 Custer County 9,330 89.0% 88.9% 75.8% 6.0 $50,278 Davison County 19,907 100.0% 99.5% 99.2% 45.7 $36,524 Day County 5,408 99.6% 99.6% 87.1% 5.3 $37,817 Deuel County 4,335 100.0% 99.8% 90.9% 7.0 $37,556 Dewey County 5,322 93.9% 93.6% 81.5% 2.3 $21,940 Douglas County 2,849 99.8% 99.8% 94.3% 6.6 $37,172 Edmunds County 4,027 99.2% 98.7% 63.1% 3.6 $43,546 Fall River County 7,359 79.9% 79.6% 82.2% 4.2 $36,268 Faulk County 2,136 99.2% 99.2% 58.6% 2.2 $36,556 Grant County 7,618 99.6% 99.6% 87.9% 11.2 $38,497 Gregory County 4,110 99.1% 98.9% 45.3% 4.0 $32,510 Haakon County 1,834 99.4% 99.4% 83.4% 1.0 $35,643 Hamlin County 6,596 100.0% 100.0% 90.3% 13.0 $35,757 Hand County 3,097 99.8% 99.8% 66.6% 2.2 $43,377 Hanson County 3,477 95.5% 94.3% 91.9% 8.0 $36,246 Harding County 1,325 100.0% 100.0% 60.8% 0.5 $48,974 Hughes County 17,526 100.0% 96.8% 98.3% 23.6 $38,880 Hutchinson County 7,416 100.0% 100.0% 85.9% 9.1 $38,061 Hyde County 1,215 100.0% 100.0% 90.2% 1.4 $35,789 Jackson County 2,737 76.7% 76.1% 78.0% 1.5 $17,120 Jerauld County 1,689 99.8% 99.8% 93.4% 3.2 $47,339 Jones County 874 100.0% 100.0% 83.1% 0.9 $29,059 Kingsbury County 5,261 99.6% 98.0% 95.7% 6.3 $37,976 Lake County 11,006 99.6% 98.7% 98.8% 19.6 $43,820 Lawrence County 28,809 90.0% 81.2% 88.3% 36.0 $42,663 Lincoln County 75,244 99.4% 98.6% 98.0% 130.3 $50,843 Lyman County 3,721 98.7% 98.7% 86.9% 2.3 $29,144 Marshall County 4,395 99.6% 99.6% 85.9% 5.2 $42,601 McCook County 5,771 99.2% 99.1% 87.8% 10.1 $37,131 McPherson County 2,307 100.0% 100.0% 65.7% 2.0 $40,645 Meade County 30,918 92.0% 83.9% 89.2% 8.9 $36,301 Mellette County 1,834 67.0% 64.8% 86.9% 1.4 $18,423 Miner County 2,303 99.4% 99.4% 90.3% 4.0 $34,056 Minnehaha County 208,639 99.4% 99.1% 99.1% 258.6 $41,644 Moody County 6,529 100.0% 98.9% 92.8% 12.6 $36,544 Oglala Lakota County 13,360 69.2% 69.1% 81.6% 6.4 $11,650 Pennington County 115,979 93.4% 92.5% 95.5% 41.8 $40,527 Perkins County 2,832 100.0% 100.0% 75.5% 1.0 $41,539 Potter County 2,402 100.0% 100.0% 66.9% 2.8 $37,661 Roberts County 10,283 100.0% 99.9% 84.3% 9.3 $31,216 Sanborn County 2,392 99.7% 99.7% 79.3% 4.2 $34,851 Spink County 6,108 97.8% 96.6% 75.8% 4.1 $37,347 Stanley County 3,015 97.3% 96.0% 95.0% 2.1 $48,110 Sully County 1,468 100.0% 100.0% 86.0% 1.5 $47,550 Todd County 9,172 52.0% 50.7% 81.5% 6.6 $13,849 Tripp County 5,717 96.3% 92.7% 83.3% 3.5 $31,961 Turner County 9,087 99.2% 98.7% 98.6% 14.7 $36,569 Union County 17,402 99.4% 97.5% 96.7% 37.8 $49,563 Walworth County 5,270 100.0% 100.0% 90.8% 7.4 $37,717 Yankton County 23,509 95.0% 92.6% 97.7% 45.1 $39,880 Ziebach County 2,418 98.7% 98.7% 74.2% 1.2 $26,500 Tennessee 7,227,717 97.7% 97.1% 88.4% 175.3 $37,866 Anderson County 81,448 96.1% 94.8% 92.1% 241.5 $35,460 Bedford County 54,228 90.6% 88.9% 87.6% 114.5 $29,468 Benton County 16,173 97.9% 97.3% 70.4% 41.0 $28,169 Bledsoe County 15,591 96.7% 96.7% 44.9% 38.3 $23,547 Blount County 142,211 97.1% 95.8% 93.1% 254.5 $38,705 Bradley County 113,782 96.2% 95.1% 91.1% 346.1 $32,249 Campbell County 40,238 93.8% 92.8% 78.1% 83.8 $28,414 Cannon County 15,142 100.0% 100.0% 53.4% 57.0 $29,745 Carroll County 29,107 89.9% 88.1% 72.1% 48.7 $27,126 Carter County 57,432 97.6% 97.3% 77.9% 168.3 $29,232 Cheatham County 42,604 92.7% 92.1% 72.8% 140.8 $38,581 Chester County 17,876 99.8% 99.8% 75.4% 62.6 $27,480 Claiborne County 33,070 95.9% 95.8% 72.4% 76.1 $27,552 Clay County 7,857 100.0% 100.0% 44.7% 33.2 $23,401 Cocke County 37,596 96.7% 96.3% 65.2% 86.2 $27,442 Coffee County 61,285 97.7% 97.2% 71.7% 142.9 $29,543 Crockett County 13,973 100.0% 100.0% 84.5% 52.6 $32,495 Cumberland County 65,618 97.9% 97.2% 58.3% 96.3 $32,517 Davidson County 729,505 99.8% 99.4% 99.2% 448.3 $48,394 DeKalb County 21,747 100.0% 100.0% 55.3% 71.4 $28,137 Decatur County 11,800 98.1% 98.0% 59.5% 35.3 $26,073 Dickson County 57,641 91.3% 89.1% 73.9% 117.7 $37,163 Dyer County 36,403 99.5% 99.3% 93.4% 71.1 $37,628 Fayette County 44,476 99.5% 99.4% 79.6% 63.1 $42,294 Fentress County 20,129 100.0% 100.0% 25.7% 40.4 $24,283 Franklin County 45,137 79.9% 77.3% 80.4% 81.4 $32,926 Gibson County 51,422 96.4% 95.5% 87.5% 85.3 $29,139 Giles County 30,971 77.6% 74.9% 72.7% 50.7 $34,348 Grainger County 25,073 99.1% 99.1% 59.7% 89.4 $28,789 Greene County 73,396 93.7% 92.2% 77.5% 118.0 $30,170 Grundy County 14,148 100.0% 100.0% 44.8% 39.3 $24,411 Hamblen County 67,715 100.0% 100.0% 94.2% 420.1 $30,120 Hamilton County 386,256 99.7% 99.6% 96.6% 712.4 $43,484 Hancock County 7,038 99.8% 99.8% 32.8% 31.7 $24,037 Hardeman County 25,434 99.6% 99.6% 76.0% 38.1 $22,580 Hardin County 27,617 92.9% 90.1% 71.8% 47.8 $27,876 Hawkins County 59,371 98.8% 98.6% 77.3% 121.9 $29,206 Haywood County 17,097 99.9% 99.7% 84.1% 32.1 $25,554 Henderson County 28,183 96.0% 95.1% 74.5% 54.2 $27,722 Henry County 32,883 92.3% 91.3% 67.6% 58.5 $29,136 Hickman County 25,859 87.1% 86.7% 37.5% 42.2 $29,512 Houston County 8,538 99.6% 99.6% 39.1% 42.6 $30,169 Humphreys County 19,554 100.0% 99.9% 68.1% 36.8 $30,868 Jackson County 12,376 99.9% 99.9% 15.3% 40.1 $27,572 Jefferson County 59,217 98.5% 98.2% 86.6% 215.3 $34,953 Johnson County 18,506 94.4% 94.1% 60.5% 62.0 $28,786 Knox County 506,748 99.6% 99.1% 99.2% 996.9 $41,957 Lake County 6,422 100.0% 100.0% 97.2% 38.7 $16,275 Lauderdale County 24,630 99.1% 99.0% 78.0% 52.2 $25,716 Lawrence County 46,467 85.7% 85.1% 76.6% 75.3 $27,208 Lewis County 13,418 98.4% 98.4% 65.1% 47.6 $29,149 Lincoln County 36,751 91.8% 89.8% 73.7% 64.4 $34,761 Loudon County 62,129 96.2% 94.8% 93.9% 271.0 $42,817 Macon County 27,189 100.0% 100.0% 42.3% 88.5 $27,065 Madison County 100,409 100.0% 100.0% 93.6% 180.2 $32,221 Marion County 29,826 99.7% 99.7% 75.1% 59.9 $29,313 Marshall County 37,847 85.3% 83.9% 76.8% 100.8 $35,984 Maury County 113,411 96.0% 95.0% 88.5% 185.0 $37,158 McMinn County 56,754 90.0% 87.3% 73.1% 132.0 $30,669 McNairy County 26,103 85.3% 83.9% 72.2% 46.4 $26,747 Meigs County 13,937 96.0% 95.2% 49.2% 71.4 $30,197 Monroe County 49,154 81.9% 78.4% 67.4% 77.3 $29,107 Montgomery County 246,025 100.0% 99.9% 96.7% 456.3 $33,645 Moore County 6,773 63.4% 62.5% 36.2% 52.4 $37,193 Morgan County 21,954 99.9% 99.8% 48.0% 42.0 $30,576 Obion County 30,261 99.6% 99.5% 85.5% 55.5 $29,891 Overton County 23,551 100.0% 100.0% 53.3% 54.3 $30,191 Perry County 8,987 99.8% 99.8% 46.5% 21.7 $25,563 Pickett County 5,108 100.0% 100.0% 17.9% 31.3 $28,784 Polk County 18,338 80.6% 78.6% 42.8% 42.2 $33,714 Putnam County 84,894 99.6% 97.2% 80.5% 211.6 $30,508 Rhea County 34,759 95.6% 94.7% 74.2% 110.2 $28,160 Roane County 56,742 93.3% 92.0% 78.7% 157.3 $36,357 Robertson County 78,459 99.6% 99.6% 91.1% 164.7 $36,135 Rutherford County 376,968 98.5% 97.6% 97.9% 608.7 $37,294 Scott County 22,517 100.0% 100.0% 66.1% 42.3 $23,544 Sequatchie County 17,620 99.9% 99.9% 71.3% 66.3 $26,368 Sevier County 100,184 95.0% 93.4% 86.3% 169.1 $33,686 Shelby County 910,530 99.3% 99.1% 99.8% 197.2 $37,666 Smith County 20,783 100.0% 100.0% 51.2% 66.1 $32,720 Stewart County 14,365 100.0% 100.0% 50.3% 31.2 $29,881 Sullivan County 162,703 99.2% 98.8% 95.9% 393.5 $35,143 Sumner County 211,721 99.9% 99.4% 93.1% 399.9 $42,482 Tipton County 62,187 99.9% 99.9% 87.1% 136.5 $33,312 Trousdale County 12,159 99.3% 99.2% 49.2% 106.3 $26,692 Unicoi County 17,872 98.2% 98.0% 64.8% 96.1 $29,087 Union County 21,064 93.4% 92.0% 51.1% 94.2 $29,725 Van Buren County 6,686 99.0% 99.0% 43.4% 24.5 $27,404 Warren County 43,619 99.8% 99.7% 69.7% 100.8 $28,619 Washington County 139,642 97.1% 94.8% 95.7% 427.7 $36,493 Wayne County 15,974 98.6% 98.6% 42.6% 21.8 $29,526 Weakley County 33,162 95.1% 94.6% 77.2% 57.1 $26,807 White County 29,108 99.8% 99.8% 48.6% 77.3 $28,427 Williamson County 269,136 99.0% 98.4% 96.5% 461.7 $64,632 Wilson County 169,948 97.8% 96.8% 92.2% 297.7 $45,461 Texas 31,290,755 97.7% 92.5% 98.4% 119.8 $39,446 Anderson County 59,512 59.5% 56.2% 81.7% 56.0 $25,793 Andrews County 18,923 93.1% 91.9% 99.7% 12.6 $36,935 Angelina County 88,094 76.6% 75.3% 87.5% 110.4 $28,858 Aransas County 25,595 99.9% 95.4% 99.7% 101.5 $41,138 Archer County 9,155 99.7% 86.5% 95.2% 10.1 $39,715 Armstrong County 1,809 99.7% 90.0% 94.0% 2.0 $33,883 Atascosa County 52,783 98.8% 58.6% 95.3% 43.3 $28,648 Austin County 32,546 94.2% 49.5% 97.8% 50.3 $37,915 Bailey County 7,031 100.0% 100.0% 93.6% 8.5 $30,860 Bandera County 22,830 92.6% 92.0% 91.6% 28.9 $39,552 Bastrop County 114,931 90.3% 70.4% 97.6% 129.4 $34,363 Baylor County 3,533 98.0% 84.5% 89.7% 4.1 $28,579 Bee County 31,226 97.7% 65.0% 97.8% 35.5 $22,771 Bell County 399,578 99.2% 94.1% 99.3% 379.2 $33,558 Bexar County 2,127,729 99.4% 98.1% 100.0% 715.5 $35,795 Blanco County 13,358 90.5% 39.8% 90.9% 18.8 $47,358 Borden County 557 79.4% 67.1% 61.6% 0.6 $36,074 Bosque County 19,013 89.7% 40.3% 76.6% 19.3 $35,879 Bowie County 91,992 90.4% 90.0% 90.5% 104.0 $31,100 Brazoria County 413,215 99.2% 91.8% 99.5% 303.1 $41,681 Brazos County 249,624 97.5% 89.6% 99.6% 425.9 $33,928 Brewster County 9,508 98.2% 81.0% 85.5% 1.5 $36,716 Briscoe County 1,494 99.3% 99.3% 90.5% 1.7 $40,723 Brooks County 6,740 99.9% 86.4% 97.5% 7.1 $25,010 Brown County 38,631 92.3% 68.0% 95.6% 40.9 $31,827 Burleson County 20,179 70.7% 31.4% 88.1% 30.6 $39,545 Burnet County 55,722 95.1% 52.6% 94.2% 56.0 $43,180 Caldwell County 52,430 95.2% 66.7% 98.1% 96.3 $30,497 Calhoun County 19,942 99.9% 94.0% 98.1% 39.3 $38,539 Callahan County 14,615 91.0% 78.2% 88.7% 16.3 $33,609 Cameron County 431,874 99.8% 96.2% 99.9% 484.3 $23,142 Camp County 13,164 98.4% 92.5% 67.2% 67.2 $28,347 Carson County 5,822 90.7% 79.4% 95.7% 6.3 $41,529 Cass County 28,622 77.7% 73.4% 64.3% 30.5 $29,362 Castro County 7,380 98.4% 84.5% 80.4% 8.3 $27,587 Chambers County 56,179 89.6% 85.4% 98.1% 94.1 $40,487 Cherokee County 53,223 77.4% 73.6% 75.3% 50.5 $27,825 Childress County 6,679 80.4% 77.1% 96.4% 9.6 $30,197 Clay County 10,730 99.3% 90.7% 89.0% 9.9 $37,126 Cochran County 2,583 89.9% 85.9% 94.1% 3.3 $23,292 Coke County 3,396 92.3% 62.2% 89.5% 3.7 $30,384 Coleman County 7,990 96.2% 77.8% 88.6% 6.3 $32,880 Collin County 1,254,658 98.5% 94.0% 99.9% 491.4 $55,057 Collingsworth County 2,611 79.6% 74.5% 83.8% 2.8 $31,033 Colorado County 21,475 94.5% 58.4% 92.3% 22.4 $37,885 Comal County 201,628 98.5% 96.8% 99.3% 360.4 $51,472 Comanche County 14,359 96.1% 56.2% 91.3% 15.3 $31,183 Concho County 3,326 95.4% 67.6% 86.5% 3.4 $26,200 Cooke County 44,258 96.7% 76.5% 92.6% 50.6 $38,518 Coryell County 86,370 96.2% 66.4% 97.5% 82.1 $29,059 Cottle County 1,263 97.3% 97.1% 91.6% 1.4 $33,973 Crane County 4,594 99.8% 90.8% 99.5% 5.9 $30,862 Crockett County 2,799 95.2% 80.6% 98.1% 1.0 $36,215 Crosby County 5,030 98.1% 93.8% 94.2% 5.6 $30,845 Culberson County 2,254 75.6% 75.4% 98.0% 0.6 $22,621 Dallam County 7,526 99.2% 99.1% 98.3% 5.0 $27,774 Dallas County 2,656,021 99.2% 98.4% 100.0% 42.2 $41,272 Dawson County 11,758 99.9% 98.8% 99.1% 13.1 $26,182 DeWitt County 20,252 98.8% 65.1% 97.1% 22.3 $30,723 Deaf Smith County 18,495 99.6% 97.2% 98.8% 12.4 $24,087 Delta County 5,647 96.8% 78.2% 88.2% 22.0 $31,640 Denton County 1,045,120 99.3% 95.4% 99.8% 189.7 $52,909 Dickens County 1,725 99.4% 99.3% 88.1% 1.9 $31,451 Dimmit County 8,181 86.0% 80.5% 96.2% 6.2 $20,919 Donley County 3,193 83.2% 77.3% 95.1% 3.4 $27,623 Duval County 9,585 70.9% 50.7% 92.6% 5.3 $23,379 Eastland County 18,290 97.9% 67.6% 92.7% 19.7 $31,650 Ector County 170,022 99.8% 90.0% 100.0% 189.4 $34,459 Edwards County 1,383 76.5% 40.4% 88.6% 0.7 $25,240 El Paso County 875,784 99.7% 98.6% 100.0% 864.3 $27,541 Ellis County 232,384 98.6% 77.2% 98.9% 248.3 $39,646 Erath County 44,496 95.0% 86.3% 91.9% 41.1 $33,116 Falls County 17,752 94.9% 11.6% 89.2% 23.2 $29,535 Fannin County 38,650 79.2% 42.8% 85.8% 43.4 $34,865 Fayette County 25,488 93.7% 77.4% 96.6% 26.8 $41,964 Fisher County 3,665 68.4% 42.4% 86.8% 4.1 $35,440 Floyd County 5,042 80.8% 77.9% 93.5% 5.1 $31,438 Foard County 1,053 96.4% 94.7% 82.9% 1.5 $27,873 Fort Bend County 958,434 99.1% 95.9% 100.0% 112.2 $46,693 Franklin County 10,912 98.5% 85.1% 73.8% 38.4 $39,633 Freestone County 20,645 72.2% 46.2% 82.6% 23.5 $29,170 Frio County 19,520 98.4% 77.7% 96.6% 17.2 $22,170 Gaines County 22,892 98.0% 55.4% 97.7% 15.2 $30,786 Galveston County 367,407 99.6% 98.3% 100.0% 968.7 $44,123 Garza County 4,645 99.2% 94.5% 98.2% 5.2 $20,328 Gillespie County 28,159 98.2% 55.6% 94.9% 26.6 $43,555 Glasscock County 1,153 99.7% 90.9% 73.4% 1.3 $53,801 Goliad County 7,221 97.0% 33.0% 91.7% 8.5 $38,705 Gonzales County 20,040 99.7% 78.3% 96.0% 18.8 $31,773 Gray County 20,888 91.6% 82.5% 98.3% 22.6 $30,893 Grayson County 150,532 97.4% 83.9% 97.2% 161.4 $36,711 Gregg County 126,679 97.4% 96.4% 99.3% 463.4 $33,578 Grimes County 33,448 95.6% 86.3% 89.9% 42.5 $31,961 Guadalupe County 195,166 99.8% 96.2% 99.7% 274.4 $39,766 Hale County 31,953 95.2% 91.8% 98.5% 31.8 $24,606 Hall County 2,828 96.7% 91.0% 81.3% 3.2 $24,649 Hamilton County 8,644 93.8% 65.9% 86.1% 10.3 $36,865 Hansford County 5,006 88.3% 88.1% 67.2% 5.4 $34,184 Hardeman County 3,417 100.0% 73.0% 96.9% 4.9 $29,505 Hardin County 58,670 97.7% 96.0% 91.3% 65.9 $36,761 Harris County 5,009,295 99.4% 98.6% 100.0% 934.6 $39,978 Harrison County 71,370 81.7% 79.7% 84.7% 79.3 $31,547 Hartley County 4,996 84.3% 81.9% 95.4% 3.4 $30,181 Haskell County 5,435 96.3% 88.9% 83.4% 6.0 $37,896 Hays County 292,013 98.2% 92.2% 99.2% 431.4 $41,931 Hemphill County 3,134 84.7% 81.1% 49.6% 3.5 $45,325 Henderson County 87,467 87.5% 74.5% 85.8% 100.1 $33,734 Hidalgo County 914,805 99.6% 97.4% 99.8% 582.3 $22,005 Hill County 38,771 94.3% 49.5% 88.9% 40.4 $31,410 Hockley County 21,505 95.3% 79.5% 94.6% 23.7 $30,131 Hood County 69,126 97.8% 91.8% 96.0% 164.3 $44,564 Hopkins County 38,784 96.1% 85.3% 85.7% 50.5 $32,536 Houston County 22,197 62.1% 56.7% 80.0% 18.0 $27,784 Howard County 30,833 100.0% 91.2% 99.5% 34.2 $34,587 Hudspeth County 3,608 33.2% 7.2% 92.8% 0.8 $19,142 Hunt County 118,729 96.8% 78.5% 93.8% 141.3 $32,446 Hutchinson County 19,721 96.6% 90.1% 98.9% 22.2 $31,917 Irion County 1,526 91.0% 42.0% 95.3% 1.5 $32,883 Jack County 9,398 94.9% 46.5% 81.4% 10.3 $31,398 Jackson County 15,284 95.5% 78.2% 94.5% 18.4 $32,146 Jasper County 32,907 91.3% 88.6% 84.8% 35.1 $32,261 Jeff Davis County 1,778 68.1% 28.3% 64.0% 0.8 $35,662 Jefferson County 253,948 96.4% 95.5% 99.7% 289.6 $31,855 Jim Hogg County 4,583 99.7% 93.7% 99.7% 4.0 $17,049 Jim Wells County 38,886 99.8% 73.7% 95.2% 44.9 $25,529 Johnson County 210,547 99.2% 91.6% 98.5% 290.5 $34,302 Jones County 20,850 90.5% 68.2% 79.2% 22.5 $23,851 Karnes County 15,137 94.8% 55.2% 96.6% 20.2 $28,251 Kaufman County 197,829 99.2% 77.1% 97.9% 253.4 $34,131 Kendall County 51,828 98.3% 87.4% 95.0% 78.2 $57,181 Kenedy County 330 86.4% 74.5% 21.8% 0.2 $31,183 Kent County 703 98.7% 98.7% 92.3% 0.8 $35,087 Kerr County 53,900 97.5% 88.2% 96.7% 48.9 $39,822 Kimble County 4,401 81.5% 56.1% 92.6% 3.5 $37,812 King County 215 92.6% 91.2% 58.1% 0.2 $30,890 Kinney County 3,191 79.5% 79.4% 96.1% 2.3 $34,491 Kleberg County 30,442 99.9% 84.7% 98.5% 34.5 $26,301 Knox County 3,255 97.7% 89.2% 49.3% 3.8 $26,698 La Salle County 6,679 72.4% 67.4% 86.0% 4.5 $16,317 Lamar County 51,249 86.7% 68.3% 92.1% 56.5 $31,430 Lamb County 12,687 95.7% 90.3% 84.4% 12.5 $26,993 Lampasas County 23,539 94.5% 52.2% 95.0% 33.0 $36,318 Lavaca County 20,605 94.0% 64.2% 95.6% 21.2 $35,549 Lee County 18,451 81.0% 42.3% 90.9% 29.3 $31,961 Leon County 16,698 58.6% 43.3% 78.5% 15.6 $32,596 Liberty County 115,042 70.4% 60.9% 93.1% 99.3 $26,368 Limestone County 22,569 88.4% 60.6% 87.6% 24.9 $27,878 Lipscomb County 2,880 74.6% 73.6% 13.2% 3.1 $34,127 Live Oak County 11,967 96.6% 38.8% 81.9% 11.5 $27,757 Llano County 23,163 94.9% 57.8% 94.4% 24.8 $52,514 Loving County 48 62.5% 62.5% 100.0% 0.1 $86,035 Lubbock County 327,394 99.7% 93.5% 99.9% 365.6 $35,170 Lynn County 5,952 100.0% 98.2% 95.8% 6.7 $33,044 Madison County 13,877 71.5% 60.9% 97.0% 29.8 $26,453 Marion County 9,704 70.5% 68.9% 51.9% 25.5 $29,117 Martin County 5,179 99.6% 96.3% 97.2% 5.7 $46,701 Mason County 3,987 80.4% 58.9% 91.6% 4.3 $36,189 Matagorda County 36,391 97.3% 83.5% 98.5% 33.3 $30,189 Maverick County 58,829 97.9% 97.1% 99.9% 46.0 $21,952 McCulloch County 7,448 97.6% 87.4% 97.8% 7.0 $30,468 McLennan County 270,358 99.4% 87.2% 99.2% 260.8 $33,019 McMullen County 565 94.3% 79.3% 65.5% 0.5 $23,859 Medina County 55,619 96.9% 60.9% 95.7% 42.0 $32,091 Menard County 1,911 89.2% 60.5% 86.5% 2.1 $32,986 Midland County 183,587 99.7% 90.0% 100.0% 203.9 $48,908 Milam County 26,159 87.6% 54.2% 89.1% 25.7 $33,760 Mills County 4,563 98.4% 98.0% 83.7% 6.1 $36,334 Mitchell County 8,968 95.6% 54.5% 91.6% 9.8 $28,277 Montague County 21,890 96.7% 59.3% 88.7% 23.5 $30,689 Montgomery County 749,613 96.6% 95.6% 99.7% 719.3 $48,550 Moore County 21,872 99.4% 86.6% 99.3% 24.3 $27,472 Morris County 12,184 87.2% 85.8% 78.3% 48.4 $27,503 Motley County 1,015 99.1% 99.1% 95.3% 1.0 $29,882 Nacogdoches County 65,728 69.4% 66.4% 83.8% 69.5 $28,856 Navarro County 56,533 92.6% 54.0% 94.1% 56.0 $27,846 Newton County 11,908 66.4% 62.5% 70.8% 12.8 $25,045 Nolan County 14,182 97.7% 85.7% 96.6% 15.6 $31,045 Nueces County 353,125 99.7% 96.5% 99.8% 420.9 $33,560 Ochiltree County 9,717 90.6% 88.8% 96.5% 10.6 $33,106 Oldham County 1,823 97.0% 70.8% 94.0% 1.2 $31,637 Orange County 86,115 98.3% 97.0% 98.5% 258.0 $36,408 Palo Pinto County 30,231 93.4% 63.5% 90.9% 31.7 $32,196 Panola County 23,022 52.0% 47.0% 62.3% 28.4 $35,020 Parker County 179,700 96.9% 61.0% 95.6% 198.8 $45,471 Parmer County 9,669 99.7% 99.7% 98.7% 11.0 $29,776 Pecos County 14,712 91.0% 70.0% 92.3% 3.1 $29,690 Polk County 54,258 89.1% 82.4% 87.9% 51.3 $28,346 Potter County 114,649 99.1% 92.4% 99.8% 126.2 $27,406 Presidio County 5,686 96.7% 80.0% 96.2% 1.5 $22,463 Rains County 13,306 95.7% 50.4% 83.0% 58.0 $38,483 Randall County 150,547 99.6% 96.8% 99.7% 164.9 $41,758 Reagan County 3,139 98.0% 83.8% 98.4% 2.7 $27,477 Real County 2,772 74.0% 70.9% 67.2% 4.0 $23,000 Red River County 11,696 86.7% 82.2% 74.3% 11.2 $28,337 Reeves County 11,956 90.6% 85.9% 99.7% 4.5 $24,438 Refugio County 6,739 92.7% 68.8% 96.3% 8.7 $26,972 Roberts County 837 38.6% 38.5% 43.6% 0.9 $31,522 Robertson County 17,659 77.6% 44.9% 75.4% 20.7 $31,209 Rockwall County 137,044 99.9% 96.1% 100.0% 77.3 $54,098 Runnels County 9,751 95.7% 68.6% 96.3% 9.3 $31,419 Rusk County 53,391 79.3% 77.3% 73.7% 57.8 $33,420 Sabine County 10,058 54.4% 48.2% 34.6% 20.5 $38,367 San Augustine County 7,767 30.9% 29.8% 59.0% 14.6 $25,902 San Jacinto County 29,326 78.2% 75.0% 82.3% 51.5 $30,234 San Patricio County 71,467 99.8% 92.3% 99.1% 103.1 $31,692 San Saba County 5,508 98.3% 98.3% 87.2% 4.9 $29,823 Schleicher County 2,302 92.3% 59.6% 92.9% 1.8 $33,900 Scurry County 16,211 84.1% 79.4% 97.3% 17.9 $30,274 Shackelford County 3,169 93.1% 79.1% 90.2% 3.5 $34,010 Shelby County 24,192 37.4% 33.7% 61.3% 30.4 $28,183 Sherman County 2,771 93.8% 92.8% 93.0% 3.0 $52,788 Smith County 249,091 95.0% 93.4% 96.6% 270.3 $34,785 Somervell County 10,098 86.9% 69.4% 83.5% 54.2 $40,711 Starr County 66,587 97.4% 94.7% 98.2% 54.4 $18,063 Stephens County 9,475 93.1% 75.0% 90.9% 10.6 $30,030 Sterling County 1,387 92.4% 0.0% 95.2% 1.5 $33,497 Stonewall County 1,235 93.7% 89.6% 92.5% 1.3 $41,521 Sutton County 3,269 93.4% 84.9% 93.5% 2.2 $30,353 Swisher County 6,877 99.7% 99.6% 95.2% 7.7 $23,065 Tarrant County 2,230,704 99.6% 97.8% 100.0% 578.0 $41,364 Taylor County 148,813 99.9% 96.4% 98.7% 162.5 $33,332 Terrell County 718 96.9% 96.1% 92.9% 0.3 $35,603 Terry County 11,602 100.0% 98.4% 96.6% 13.1 $24,987 Throckmorton County 1,532 85.4% 72.5% 88.7% 1.7 $33,147 Titus County 31,547 96.0% 91.6% 89.5% 77.7 $26,514 Tom Green County 120,103 99.8% 90.0% 98.7% 78.9 $34,888 Travis County 1,363,767 98.8% 96.5% 99.9% 371.9 $59,289 Trinity County 14,489 46.8% 41.8% 69.3% 20.9 $31,706 Tyler County 20,560 93.0% 91.7% 85.0% 22.2 $32,501 Upshur County 44,050 84.7% 80.9% 73.8% 75.6 $32,748 Upton County 3,128 90.3% 21.9% 95.6% 2.5 $30,320 Uvalde County 25,138 92.5% 89.2% 97.5% 16.2 $26,437 Val Verde County 47,999 98.3% 96.3% 99.1% 15.3 $27,114 Van Zandt County 65,304 97.4% 83.7% 83.4% 77.5 $34,078 Victoria County 91,949 99.5% 87.1% 98.5% 104.2 $33,305 Walker County 83,722 80.7% 66.9% 94.9% 106.8 $24,983 Waller County 65,109 91.5% 57.6% 98.1% 126.8 $33,960 Ward County 11,038 85.5% 81.7% 99.5% 13.2 $35,376 Washington County 37,810 89.5% 50.4% 95.2% 62.6 $41,902 Webb County 272,823 98.7% 98.0% 99.8% 81.2 $24,408 Wharton County 42,035 97.3% 68.7% 98.0% 38.7 $32,579 Wheeler County 4,824 35.2% 9.3% 84.6% 5.3 $30,869 Wichita County 129,984 99.9% 93.7% 99.9% 207.1 $32,762 Wilbarger County 12,455 98.9% 90.4% 83.3% 12.8 $28,997 Willacy County 20,027 91.9% 80.5% 99.0% 33.9 $22,607 Williamson County 727,480 99.2% 92.6% 99.3% 652.0 $51,260 Wilson County 55,415 98.9% 67.1% 98.3% 68.9 $41,249 Winkler County 7,381 86.8% 85.4% 100.0% 8.8 $34,666 Wise County 81,275 93.0% 46.4% 94.4% 89.9 $37,908 Wood County 48,742 96.3% 87.5% 66.1% 75.5 $35,322 Yoakum County 7,581 94.6% 83.4% 97.8% 9.5 $35,856 Young County 18,236 98.3% 83.9% 91.6% 19.9 $36,613 Zapata County 13,819 96.8% 96.2% 93.6% 13.8 $19,131 Zavala County 9,209 95.3% 94.9% 99.0% 7.1 $20,605 U.S. Virgin Isl. 104,377 99.8% 99.3% 56.9% 776.8 N/A St. Croix Island 49,112 99.9% 99.8% 53.0% 589.1 N/A St. John Island 4,648 100.0% 99.8% 12.9% 236.1 N/A St. Thomas Island 50,617 99.7% 98.8% 64.7% 616.3 N/A Utah 3,503,556 98.3% 94.9% 98.7% 42.5 $39,240 Beaver County 7,424 93.7% 83.5% 97.4% 2.9 $29,979 Box Elder County 64,120 96.6% 90.9% 98.2% 11.2 $31,738 Cache County 145,487 96.9% 87.7% 97.9% 124.9 $32,080 Carbon County 20,613 99.4% 99.3% 96.4% 13.9 $28,462 Daggett County 956 96.8% 45.0% 92.5% 1.4 $29,882 Davis County 378,470 99.8% 99.4% 99.9% 265.5 $41,451 Duchesne County 20,803 87.2% 67.4% 90.2% 6.4 $30,966 Emery County 10,161 99.0% 98.9% 95.9% 2.3 $29,645 Garfield County 5,290 91.9% 90.8% 75.3% 1.0 $31,935 Grand County 9,788 98.9% 98.8% 94.2% 2.7 $41,443 Iron County 65,879 96.0% 88.7% 97.0% 20.0 $28,886 Juab County 13,297 96.4% 68.1% 96.6% 3.9 $32,467 Kane County 8,525 84.5% 78.7% 88.3% 2.1 $38,369 Millard County 13,572 95.3% 65.8% 96.4% 2.0 $27,109 Morgan County 13,093 94.9% 65.1% 93.0% 21.5 $43,194 Piute County 1,534 94.6% 94.2% 86.8% 2.0 $23,171 Rich County 2,752 98.5% 37.9% 94.0% 2.7 $29,074 Salt Lake County 1,216,274 99.8% 99.3% 99.9% 639.0 $43,393 San Juan County 14,601 58.0% 53.6% 61.8% 1.9 $24,634 Sanpete County 30,732 96.7% 83.2% 96.9% 19.3 $26,663 Sevier County 22,520 97.5% 87.1% 98.6% 11.8 $30,447 Summit County 43,109 93.9% 86.4% 95.8% 23.0 $74,755 Tooele County 84,488 98.2% 95.5% 97.1% 12.2 $37,365 Uintah County 38,307 93.6% 83.3% 94.1% 8.5 $30,586 Utah County 747,234 97.7% 92.8% 98.6% 372.9 $35,091 Wasatch County 37,858 96.0% 86.0% 96.1% 32.2 $54,096 Washington County 207,943 97.9% 94.5% 98.2% 85.7 $37,962 Wayne County 2,608 96.9% 96.9% 82.6% 1.1 $34,710 Weber County 276,118 99.4% 96.4% 99.5% 479.1 $37,055 Vermont 648,493 88.7% 87.6% 57.7% 70.4 $44,365 Addison County 38,047 86.7% 85.8% 51.9% 49.7 $43,524 Bennington County 37,039 98.4% 98.3% 64.0% 54.9 $43,214 Caledonia County 30,535 79.1% 74.4% 52.6% 47.1 $38,153 Chittenden County 170,851 97.8% 97.6% 77.9% 318.0 $50,552 Essex County 6,037 74.9% 47.1% 42.8% 9.1 $34,221 Franklin County 51,066 90.5% 90.0% 49.0% 81.0 $38,447 Grand Isle County 7,528 63.0% 62.9% 21.5% 92.1 $53,254 Lamoille County 26,248 93.1% 93.0% 31.3% 56.8 $45,885 Orange County 30,050 50.0% 45.4% 39.0% 43.7 $41,343 Orleans County 27,726 70.8% 69.6% 41.6% 39.9 $36,459 Rutland County 60,198 98.9% 98.8% 62.7% 64.7 $38,902 Washington County 59,844 88.9% 87.9% 57.3% 87.2 $45,017 Windham County 45,627 88.6% 87.8% 45.5% 58.1 $42,142 Windsor County 57,697 81.5% 81.0% 48.8% 59.5 $47,344 Virginia 8,811,175 94.2% 92.1% 90.5% 223.2 $49,217 Accomack County 33,411 90.9% 89.2% 70.2% 74.4 $33,213 Albemarle County 117,313 89.4% 88.6% 80.0% 162.8 $57,490 Alexandria city 159,102 100.0% 97.6% 100.0% 652.7 $77,935 Alleghany County 14,632 87.7% 86.8% 73.9% 32.8 $30,925 Amelia County 13,716 43.9% 42.1% 39.5% 38.6 $33,626 Amherst County 31,650 87.7% 87.0% 57.9% 66.8 $36,275 Appomattox County 16,957 83.6% 82.7% 46.8% 50.7 $33,468 Arlington County 239,807 99.9% 99.3% 100.0% 224.3 $88,024 Augusta County 78,622 80.4% 76.1% 86.1% 81.3 $37,781 Bath County 4,071 88.1% 88.1% 20.5% 7.7 $36,110 Bedford County 82,182 93.9% 93.4% 73.0% 108.1 $42,095 Bland County 6,186 48.4% 40.1% 41.5% 17.3 $29,128 Botetourt County 34,129 91.2% 89.8% 82.2% 63.1 $41,322 Bristol city 16,316 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% 267.6 $29,646 Brunswick County 15,750 63.4% 46.8% 53.8% 27.8 $29,171 Buchanan County 18,632 95.0% 95.0% 4.3% 37.1 $26,203 Buckingham County 17,115 84.5% 70.7% 49.7% 29.5 $28,353 Buena Vista city 6,581 99.6% 99.6% 99.2% 22.2 $33,175 Campbell County 55,342 84.3% 82.3% 80.4% 110.0 $33,847 Caroline County 33,477 59.4% 52.4% 77.1% 63.5 $38,847 Carroll County 29,242 78.4% 49.7% 55.6% 61.6 $29,946 Charles City County 6,564 72.6% 70.7% 28.7% 35.9 $41,266 Charlotte County 11,258 85.2% 85.1% 43.5% 23.7 $28,682 Charlottesville city 44,767 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 369.6 $48,395 Chesapeake city 254,997 98.8% 97.3% 98.9% 753.4 $43,819 Chesterfield County 389,793 99.4% 99.1% 98.0% 920.4 $46,772 Clarke County 15,598 60.9% 56.3% 91.0% 88.7 $54,763 Colonial Heights city 18,674 99.9% 99.9% 100.0% 483.4 $38,272 Covington city 5,663 99.6% 99.4% 99.9% 35.5 $24,067 Craig County 4,829 40.8% 34.0% 37.0% 14.7 $34,122 Culpeper County 56,125 90.7% 81.7% 77.8% 148.0 $40,304 Cumberland County 10,062 59.4% 57.6% 42.2% 33.8 $36,142 Danville city 41,993 99.7% 99.4% 97.8% 981.2 $27,537 Dickenson County 13,411 89.9% 89.9% 26.3% 40.6 $26,070 Dinwiddie County 28,576 59.7% 54.7% 58.9% 56.7 $37,955 Emporia city 5,402 99.6% 99.6% 96.2% 782.5 $25,570 Essex County 10,683 51.2% 2.5% 68.1% 41.5 $32,839 Fairfax County 1,160,925 99.3% 98.7% 98.0% 969.0 $69,971 Fairfax city 26,340 99.8% 99.7% 100.0% 220.8 $62,800 Falls Church city 15,034 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 346.4 $85,077 Fauquier County 75,865 77.0% 69.2% 82.9% 117.1 $55,864 Floyd County 15,658 93.3% 92.6% 40.9% 41.1 $36,681 Fluvanna County 28,746 96.5% 95.8% 40.0% 100.1 $42,987 Franklin County 55,637 71.2% 68.9% 61.4% 80.6 $38,202 Franklin city 8,373 94.6% 94.5% 97.7% 11.6 $31,838 Frederick County 98,109 85.8% 79.5% 95.2% 237.5 $45,248 Fredericksburg city 29,992 99.6% 92.9% 100.0% 869.9 $46,503 Galax city 6,739 99.1% 99.0% 100.0% 818.2 $31,429 Giles County 16,533 87.7% 74.0% 77.0% 46.3 $33,792 Gloucester County 40,154 82.6% 78.6% 71.9% 184.4 $40,924 Goochland County 28,223 85.7% 82.3% 60.3% 100.1 $68,258 Grayson County 15,265 77.7% 64.5% 44.2% 34.6 $27,087 Greene County 21,744 94.0% 92.7% 65.2% 139.4 $41,541 Greensville County 11,150 53.3% 52.4% 52.7% 37.8 $23,125 Halifax County 33,448 70.8% 67.1% 55.4% 40.9 $27,115 Hampton city 137,596 99.5% 98.1% 100.0% 673.8 $36,787 Hanover County 115,309 87.9% 84.7% 88.7% 246.6 $51,509 Harrisonburg city 51,164 97.7% 96.3% 100.0% 950.8 $27,957 Henrico County 338,696 99.7% 99.3% 98.9% 449.4 $50,277 Henry County 49,385 89.9% 88.6% 70.8% 129.2 $28,644 Highland County 2,348 86.6% 86.6% 21.6% 5.7 $35,262 Hopewell city 22,970 99.8% 99.8% 100.0% 218.4 $26,626 Isle of Wight County 40,942 94.3% 92.6% 83.8% 129.7 $47,674 James City County 82,792 97.1% 96.2% 93.1% 581.8 $53,887 King George County 28,816 52.4% 21.2% 83.6% 160.4 $47,046 King William County 19,232 63.6% 56.4% 52.6% 70.2 $38,965 King and Queen County 6,747 91.9% 91.1% 41.0% 21.4 $39,622 Lancaster County 11,062 56.1% 30.0% 45.7% 83.0 $49,384 Lee County 21,780 99.2% 99.2% 55.0% 50.0 $25,439 Lexington city 7,802 94.7% 94.7% 100.0% 121.7 $30,839 Loudoun County 443,380 96.7% 95.7% 98.4% 859.7 $70,133 Louisa County 42,109 95.8% 94.9% 55.1% 85.1 $42,793 Lunenburg County 12,060 46.4% 43.9% 35.2% 27.9 $26,539 Lynchburg city 80,301 97.6% 96.6% 98.0% 639.6 $30,004 Madison County 14,252 76.6% 62.8% 58.1% 44.4 $40,022 Manassas Park city 16,611 99.5% 99.5% 100.0% 475.3 $43,662 Manassas city 43,616 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 431.2 $44,939 Martinsville city 13,834 99.9% 99.9% 93.1% 262.7 $28,834 Mathews County 8,602 30.7% 8.7% 58.4% 100.1 $45,767 Mecklenburg County 30,824 83.7% 81.9% 64.3% 49.3 $33,014 Middlesex County 10,949 61.6% 23.1% 77.0% 84.0 $40,661 Montgomery County 98,998 92.1% 89.2% 92.3% 255.9 $36,009 Nelson County 14,766 97.3% 97.1% 41.6% 31.4 $45,251 New Kent County 27,218 72.4% 65.7% 73.8% 129.6 $51,609 Newport News city 183,056 96.5% 95.8% 100.0% 653.4 $37,475 Norfolk city 231,105 96.7% 92.0% 100.0% 338.0 $37,433 Northampton County 12,004 93.2% 91.8% 76.1% 56.7 $38,934 Northumberland County 12,397 36.9% 29.1% 47.9% 64.8 $47,191 Norton city 3,478 100.0% 100.0% 94.5% 465.1 $27,033 Nottoway County 15,632 60.3% 43.2% 79.5% 49.7 $25,832 Orange County 38,986 96.0% 94.5% 80.1% 114.3 $45,021 Page County 23,686 68.6% 65.1% 85.7% 76.4 $31,006 Patrick County 17,308 44.1% 39.7% 37.3% 35.8 $32,864 Petersburg city 34,058 98.9% 98.0% 100.0% 499.0 $29,590 Pittsylvania County 59,410 73.4% 69.5% 69.8% 61.3 $30,209 Poquoson city 12,854 99.8% 99.7% 99.9% 837.0 $49,935 Portsmouth city 96,482 98.1% 97.0% 100.0% 897.3 $32,915 Powhatan County 32,392 81.7% 79.7% 62.0% 124.5 $48,796 Prince Edward County 22,276 86.5% 83.8% 63.9% 63.7 $25,782 Prince George County 43,589 95.2% 91.1% 84.0% 164.3 $33,937 Prince William County 497,003 99.5% 99.4% 99.1% 482.5 $50,883 Pulaski County 33,579 83.3% 78.7% 89.6% 105.0 $35,650 Radford city 17,273 99.3% 99.2% 99.5% 785.1 $25,220 Rappahannock County 7,479 45.0% 38.6% 51.5% 28.1 $57,136 Richmond County 9,215 65.2% 35.2% 54.2% 48.1 $27,687 Richmond city 233,640 99.9% 98.7% 99.8% 898.9 $44,249 Roanoke County 97,334 97.0% 94.5% 95.4% 388.5 $44,817 Roanoke city 97,912 99.3% 98.6% 99.8% 302.7 $34,792 Rockbridge County 22,368 82.8% 81.4% 59.8% 37.5 $37,739 Rockingham County 87,674 79.1% 74.2% 90.7% 103.2 $39,011 Russell County 25,420 98.9% 98.9% 59.5% 53.7 $28,484 Salem city 25,908 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 784.9 $38,127 Scott County 21,388 99.1% 99.1% 47.8% 39.9 $28,009 Shenandoah County 45,441 95.4% 92.6% 89.6% 89.4 $35,360 Smyth County 29,137 99.8% 99.8% 50.7% 64.5 $29,369 Southampton County 17,941 89.0% 87.7% 63.0% 29.9 $32,981 Spotsylvania County 152,021 92.6% 92.0% 86.1% 378.7 $46,837 Stafford County 168,919 99.1% 97.0% 95.8% 627.5 $51,999 Staunton city 26,361 99.9% 99.5% 100.0% 323.3 $35,941 Suffolk city 103,105 95.9% 94.7% 93.1% 258.3 $45,135 Surry County 6,579 95.3% 95.0% 50.0% 23.6 $38,105 Sussex County 10,753 98.6% 97.5% 43.7% 21.9 $30,457 Tazewell County 38,875 95.7% 95.3% 69.7% 74.9 $28,604 Virginia Beach city 454,808 98.9% 97.3% 99.3% 858.5 $47,372 Warren County 42,461 88.9% 86.4% 88.0% 197.9 $39,834 Washington County 54,098 99.4% 99.4% 66.8% 96.4 $38,582 Waynesboro city 23,498 99.9% 99.6% 100.0% 569.7 $32,036 Westmoreland County 19,235 39.7% 22.2% 78.4% 83.9 $37,305 Williamsburg city 16,030 94.1% 92.2% 98.8% 793.4 $35,732 Winchester city 27,800 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 24.1 $36,073 Wise County 34,973 98.6% 98.6% 60.3% 86.7 $24,622 Wythe County 28,100 91.3% 90.2% 71.6% 60.8 $33,564 York County 71,410 98.4% 97.6% 96.0% 682.0 $51,183 Washington 7,958,180 94.3% 91.5% 96.3% 119.8 $51,493 Adams County 21,039 75.0% 59.0% 95.2% 10.9 $25,934 Asotin County 22,523 96.1% 94.8% 93.1% 35.4 $38,991 Benton County 218,190 98.9% 90.3% 99.5% 128.3 $41,588 Chelan County 81,228 93.2% 92.1% 90.2% 27.8 $42,092 Clallam County 77,958 73.3% 67.1% 85.3% 44.8 $40,133 Clark County 527,269 91.9% 91.1% 96.5% 838.9 $46,391 Columbia County 4,025 77.2% 74.9% 76.2% 4.6 $42,143 Cowlitz County 113,982 83.1% 81.7% 86.1% 99.9 $36,520 Douglas County 45,795 95.8% 95.3% 95.1% 25.2 $40,039 Ferry County 7,543 20.4% 12.6% 51.4% 3.4 $33,322 Franklin County 101,238 91.4% 82.0% 98.1% 81.5 $32,752 Garfield County 2,404 68.7% 67.2% 76.2% 3.4 $34,685 Grant County 104,717 99.6% 99.6% 96.5% 39.1 $32,241 Grays Harbor County 77,893 88.0% 86.9% 88.9% 41.0 $33,763 Island County 86,478 88.7% 87.1% 89.0% 414.8 $46,226 Jefferson County 33,944 76.7% 75.4% 82.5% 18.8 $49,853 King County 2,340,211 98.9% 98.5% 99.5% 106.4 $71,062 Kitsap County 281,420 95.3% 94.7% 95.1% 712.3 $50,367 Kittitas County 48,172 96.6% 70.3% 95.4% 21.0 $41,356 Klickitat County 24,124 51.2% 45.7% 71.2% 12.9 $42,193 Lewis County 87,049 71.7% 64.2% 83.6% 36.2 $33,972 Lincoln County 11,862 40.6% 36.3% 80.9% 5.1 $38,719 Mason County 69,632 87.2% 86.5% 68.8% 72.6 $38,685 Okanogan County 44,942 41.6% 37.6% 74.6% 8.5 $31,905 Pacific County 24,245 86.4% 85.4% 84.5% 26.0 $40,128 Pend Oreille County 14,332 63.5% 58.6% 75.7% 10.2 $35,660 Pierce County 941,170 96.2% 95.5% 98.4% 564.3 $45,885 San Juan County 18,668 43.7% 41.7% 65.3% 107.3 $63,173 Skagit County 132,736 90.6% 89.1% 94.9% 76.7 $43,158 Skamania County 12,660 42.0% 40.9% 71.8% 7.6 $44,514 Snohomish County 864,113 95.7% 95.0% 98.1% 414.1 $51,836 Spokane County 555,947 97.6% 88.3% 98.8% 315.1 $39,879 Stevens County 49,015 73.0% 35.2% 78.9% 19.8 $35,577 Thurston County 302,912 92.0% 91.3% 92.7% 419.3 $44,646 Wahkiakum County 4,800 74.6% 74.3% 58.5% 18.3 $32,879 Walla Walla County 62,068 97.5% 90.0% 94.6% 48.9 $37,562 Whatcom County 234,954 92.5% 91.1% 95.0% 111.5 $43,463 Whitman County 48,399 83.6% 82.2% 86.9% 22.4 $31,884 Yakima County 258,523 99.1% 83.7% 99.1% 60.2 $29,309 West Virginia 1,769,979 85.3% 83.7% 78.0% 73.6 $32,949 Barbour County 15,369 48.1% 46.6% 62.6% 45.1 $26,055 Berkeley County 136,287 91.2% 90.4% 97.4% 424.4 $37,533 Boone County 20,496 95.0% 94.2% 30.4% 40.9 $26,984 Braxton County 12,051 37.0% 34.1% 46.1% 23.6 $23,349 Brooke County 21,285 95.5% 92.5% 95.1% 238.6 $32,157 Cabell County 91,489 95.0% 94.1% 91.4% 325.6 $32,399 Calhoun County 5,873 22.3% 18.6% 21.8% 21.0 $24,520 Clay County 7,689 36.9% 31.2% 23.3% 22.5 $23,748 Doddridge County 7,615 79.6% 79.5% 36.3% 23.8 $32,472 Fayette County 38,600 77.3% 74.8% 69.1% 58.3 $27,091 Gilmer County 7,116 53.2% 51.9% 46.8% 21.0 $20,325 Grant County 10,971 55.1% 52.0% 63.9% 23.0 $31,018 Greenbrier County 31,851 69.9% 69.0% 72.7% 31.2 $31,699 Hampshire County 23,793 75.4% 74.9% 64.5% 37.2 $31,143 Hancock County 28,054 95.8% 94.6% 96.5% 339.6 $35,452 Hardy County 14,335 89.1% 89.1% 60.1% 24.6 $29,876 Harrison County 64,472 89.4% 88.4% 85.5% 155.0 $34,054 Jackson County 27,718 75.4% 71.9% 77.9% 59.7 $35,107 Jefferson County 61,264 93.5% 91.9% 89.3% 292.7 $44,503 Kanawha County 173,906 96.4% 96.0% 88.8% 192.9 $36,168 Lewis County 16,477 68.7% 68.5% 56.8% 42.6 $31,004 Lincoln County 19,377 69.6% 69.3% 30.2% 44.3 $26,046 Logan County 30,560 92.2% 92.0% 23.7% 67.4 $28,762 Marion County 55,649 88.9% 85.3% 88.8% 180.2 $33,719 Marshall County 29,354 82.0% 79.8% 86.1% 96.1 $34,639 Mason County 24,770 76.6% 75.1% 68.2% 57.5 $31,615 McDowell County 17,147 86.1% 85.9% 21.9% 32.1 $16,599 Mercer County 57,524 87.1% 85.4% 84.5% 137.3 $28,201 Mineral County 26,778 86.0% 82.8% 82.7% 81.7 $36,399 Mingo County 21,712 82.3% 82.3% 20.3% 51.3 $22,073 Monongalia County 108,697 95.9% 94.9% 94.5% 301.9 $40,258 Monroe County 12,462 52.7% 23.6% 57.2% 26.4 $27,648 Morgan County 17,780 77.3% 73.5% 80.2% 77.6 $34,803 Nicholas County 24,017 65.1% 62.0% 66.3% 37.1 $29,257 Ohio County 41,090 97.8% 96.4% 96.6% 388.3 $38,225 Pendleton County 5,944 67.5% 67.3% 29.3% 8.5 $28,783 Pleasants County 7,358 54.2% 53.1% 63.8% 56.5 $40,318 Pocahontas County 7,653 47.4% 46.5% 21.4% 8.1 $23,387 Preston County 34,055 79.8% 78.0% 75.6% 52.5 $28,645 Putnam County 57,067 91.5% 89.2% 88.3% 165.1 $40,046 Raleigh County 72,379 94.3% 93.6% 86.1% 119.6 $28,661 Randolph County 27,190 79.2% 78.8% 78.4% 26.2 $28,277 Ritchie County 8,170 85.4% 85.2% 43.5% 18.1 $26,336 Roane County 13,540 35.4% 30.4% 48.8% 28.0 $26,492 Summers County 11,544 47.8% 44.4% 76.9% 32.0 $25,384 Taylor County 16,438 86.8% 84.9% 85.9% 95.1 $31,241 Tucker County 6,573 71.1% 64.7% 65.2% 15.7 $34,982 Tyler County 7,843 43.2% 40.8% 63.6% 30.6 $31,842 Upshur County 23,650 73.0% 71.7% 65.9% 66.7 $30,616 Wayne County 37,589 79.4% 78.5% 65.0% 74.3 $32,003 Webster County 7,947 66.9% 66.5% 49.7% 14.4 $23,343 Wetzel County 13,766 80.3% 79.9% 60.8% 38.4 $28,398 Wirt County 4,924 46.9% 44.3% 54.7% 21.2 $26,792 Wood County 82,757 94.0% 93.1% 94.3% 225.8 $33,324 Wyoming County 19,964 87.8% 87.7% 21.8% 40.0 $24,665 Wisconsin 5,960,983 95.2% 90.5% 91.6% 110.0 $42,019 Adams County 21,352 88.1% 86.9% 65.8% 33.1 $35,145 Ashland County 16,196 79.5% 70.9% 71.4% 15.5 $31,803 Barron County 46,810 89.2% 87.5% 80.7% 54.2 $36,937 Bayfield County 16,838 97.9% 87.1% 46.3% 11.4 $40,846 Brown County 273,909 99.3% 92.4% 98.9% 516.7 $40,907 Buffalo County 13,464 94.0% 91.5% 30.6% 19.9 $36,164 Burnett County 17,187 83.2% 80.7% 56.2% 20.9 $37,790 Calumet County 53,602 99.8% 85.0% 96.3% 168.4 $43,814 Chippewa County 67,323 91.4% 89.8% 89.6% 66.8 $38,212 Clark County 34,801 67.0% 45.1% 75.1% 28.8 $31,744 Columbia County 58,113 90.6% 77.5% 80.4% 75.9 $41,515 Crawford County 16,008 84.1% 83.7% 58.2% 28.1 $34,130 Dane County 588,347 98.0% 95.0% 98.4% 491.7 $51,486 Dodge County 88,635 99.8% 89.5% 92.3% 101.2 $37,295 Door County 30,512 81.7% 53.4% 70.5% 63.3 $48,630 Douglas County 44,276 79.9% 73.2% 88.5% 33.9 $38,308 Dunn County 46,135 96.9% 96.6% 73.7% 54.3 $36,207 Eau Claire County 108,830 97.6% 96.4% 93.9% 170.6 $40,845 Florence County 4,673 43.2% 39.3% 60.0% 9.6 $37,845 Fond du Lac County 104,269 99.6% 92.0% 93.8% 144.9 $38,436 Forest County 9,506 58.5% 53.1% 48.8% 9.4 $31,994 Grant County 52,330 76.3% 69.7% 72.7% 45.6 $33,079 Green County 37,183 93.2% 63.2% 77.0% 63.7 $42,505 Green Lake County 19,370 79.6% 73.8% 72.9% 55.4 $37,510 Iowa County 23,963 71.7% 65.8% 62.5% 31.4 $41,421 Iron County 6,235 45.2% 43.5% 67.3% 8.2 $35,462 Jackson County 21,027 56.2% 49.2% 60.3% 21.3 $33,387 Jefferson County 86,245 99.4% 91.8% 98.6% 155.0 $40,640 Juneau County 26,590 87.9% 84.7% 77.6% 34.7 $32,116 Kenosha County 168,754 97.5% 96.5% 100.0% 620.8 $40,540 Kewaunee County 20,751 94.1% 53.0% 87.5% 60.6 $39,364 La Crosse County 121,060 95.1% 93.9% 94.9% 267.9 $40,841 Lafayette County 17,306 72.5% 53.0% 65.9% 27.3 $34,686 Langlade County 19,535 86.2% 69.9% 72.6% 22.4 $34,160 Lincoln County 28,461 63.9% 59.7% 69.1% 32.4 $38,296 Manitowoc County 81,513 97.5% 79.4% 92.0% 138.3 $37,639 Marathon County 139,091 92.5% 83.9% 89.7% 90.0 $39,970 Marinette County 42,343 81.9% 76.9% 70.3% 30.3 $36,123 Marquette County 15,743 85.5% 83.0% 59.4% 34.5 $35,090 Menominee County 4,286 91.3% 90.4% 51.5% 12.0 $22,834 Milwaukee County 924,738 99.8% 98.8% 100.0% 829.4 $36,955 Monroe County 46,370 74.2% 69.4% 77.1% 51.5 $34,501 Oconto County 40,037 89.1% 72.3% 58.0% 40.1 $39,196 Oneida County 38,175 81.1% 79.8% 67.6% 34.3 $41,160 Outagamie County 195,389 99.3% 95.5% 96.8% 306.5 $45,323 Ozaukee County 93,956 99.7% 94.2% 99.6% 403.2 $57,651 Pepin County 7,555 99.5% 98.0% 61.4% 32.6 $40,261 Pierce County 43,380 98.8% 98.5% 87.1% 75.6 $42,456 Polk County 45,831 97.0% 95.9% 68.9% 50.1 $39,402 Portage County 72,040 97.6% 95.5% 92.9% 90.0 $39,476 Price County 14,087 75.2% 71.8% 52.7% 11.2 $35,095 Racine County 198,651 98.2% 97.1% 99.4% 597.2 $39,704 Richland County 17,123 94.0% 92.8% 48.2% 29.2 $34,011 Rock County 165,461 99.3% 94.6% 99.0% 230.4 $37,428 Rusk County 14,168 68.0% 64.1% 54.2% 15.5 $32,642 Sauk County 66,486 92.7% 91.6% 75.2% 80.0 $39,770 Sawyer County 18,835 69.8% 66.4% 54.5% 15.0 $37,653 Shawano County 41,299 93.3% 71.7% 78.2% 46.2 $36,172 Sheboygan County 118,331 98.0% 86.4% 96.4% 231.3 $39,338 St. Croix County 97,954 98.5% 97.8% 96.2% 135.6 $48,851 Taylor County 20,167 79.3% 53.3% 58.2% 20.7 $34,053 Trempealeau County 30,801 83.7% 80.0% 58.8% 42.0 $36,001 Vernon County 31,351 96.2% 96.1% 53.9% 39.6 $34,551 Vilas County 23,948 70.3% 67.1% 60.0% 27.9 $42,822 Walworth County 106,029 97.4% 95.4% 96.9% 190.9 $42,771 Washburn County 16,982 49.8% 47.4% 59.1% 21.3 $36,411 Washington County 138,727 99.8% 95.3% 99.6% 322.1 $48,255 Waukesha County 417,029 99.6% 98.9% 99.8% 758.6 $57,291 Waupaca County 51,171 84.2% 78.9% 80.6% 68.4 $40,581 Waushara County 25,079 62.3% 58.6% 73.9% 40.1 $39,624 Winnebago County 173,318 98.8% 95.2% 96.9% 398.7 $40,072 Wood County 73,943 98.4% 86.6% 92.9% 93.2 $37,954 Wyoming 587,614 92.3% 78.9% 90.6% 6.1 $41,006 Albany County 39,288 94.0% 83.3% 94.8% 9.2 $37,277 Big Horn County 12,080 66.5% 66.3% 83.3% 3.9 $31,066 Campbell County 47,946 95.7% 82.6% 94.2% 10.0 $40,983 Carbon County 14,250 77.9% 72.8% 70.4% 1.8 $35,421 Converse County 13,766 91.3% 78.1% 93.1% 3.2 $38,337 Crook County 7,775 68.4% 31.0% 73.5% 2.7 $35,109 Fremont County 39,721 92.1% 61.0% 69.2% 4.3 $32,717 Goshen County 12,635 97.3% 61.6% 90.4% 5.7 $34,997 Hot Springs County 4,625 75.5% 72.3% 85.6% 2.3 $33,942 Johnson County 8,803 86.6% 60.3% 87.4% 2.1 $39,367 Laramie County 101,783 97.8% 86.3% 96.1% 37.9 $42,449 Lincoln County 21,000 83.6% 75.6% 80.2% 5.2 $40,375 Natrona County 80,410 96.8% 90.9% 98.2% 15.1 $40,978 Niobrara County 2,301 86.4% 66.1% 79.1% 0.9 $36,676 Park County 31,082 73.4% 64.9% 92.4% 4.5 $41,425 Platte County 8,512 91.1% 63.6% 88.9% 4.1 $37,237 Sheridan County 32,978 94.8% 82.9% 93.4% 13.1 $40,533 Sublette County 8,965 96.9% 38.3% 70.9% 1.8 $57,348 Sweetwater County 41,273 98.5% 96.1% 95.3% 4.0 $40,988 Teton County 23,272 91.1% 89.4% 90.8% 5.8 $75,541 Uinta County 20,621 99.8% 60.4% 92.1% 9.9 $34,568 Washakie County 7,662 88.5% 87.4% 90.1% 3.4 $36,030 Weston County 6,866 88.2% 66.8% 84.4% 2.9 $41,745 Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. APPX. A-6 Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps on Tribal Lands, 2023-2025 June 2023 Dec. 2023 June 2024 Dec. 2024 June 2025 Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Fixed Wireline Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service Tribal Lands 2.573 62.6% 2.686 65.4% 2.798 67.3% 2.822 67.8% 2.869 69.0% Urban Areas 1.704 93.3% 1.721 94.2% 1.754 95.1% 1.742 94.4% 1.754 94.9% Rural Areas 0.869 38.1% 0.966 42.3% 1.044 45.1% 1.080 46.7% 1.116 48.3% Alaskan Villages 0.092 33.3% 0.106 38.3% 0.110 39.3% 0.099 35.5% 0.103 37.0% Urban Areas 0.065 68.3% 0.068 72.0% 0.070 73.2% 0.063 66.4% 0.067 70.2% Rural Areas 0.027 15.0% 0.038 20.7% 0.040 21.6% 0.036 19.4% 0.036 19.7% Federal Reservations 0.439 40.3% 0.477 43.8% 0.509 46.0% 0.530 47.8% 0.541 48.8% Urban Areas 0.223 80.2% 0.232 83.4% 0.243 86.2% 0.244 86.7% 0.245 87.0% Rural Areas 0.216 26.6% 0.245 30.2% 0.266 32.2% 0.286 34.6% 0.296 35.8% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.032 92.1% 0.032 92.2% 0.032 90.8% 0.032 91.6% 0.034 96.3% Urban Areas 0.026 98.9% 0.026 98.9% 0.025 93.9% 0.025 94.0% 0.027 99.9% Rural Areas 0.006 70.0% 0.006 70.7% 0.007 80.9% 0.007 83.8% 0.007 84.6% Tribal Statistical Areas 2.010 74.2% 2.071 76.5% 2.147 78.4% 2.161 78.9% 2.192 80.1% Urban Areas 1.390 97.4% 1.394 97.8% 1.416 98.3% 1.409 97.7% 1.415 98.0% Rural Areas 0.620 48.4% 0.677 52.8% 0.731 56.4% 0.752 58.0% 0.777 60.1% Fixed Terrestrial Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service Tribal Lands 2.820 68.6% 3.000 73.0% 3.175 76.3% 3.251 78.1% 3.312 79.6% Urban Areas 1.735 95.0% 1.754 96.1% 1.788 96.9% 1.786 96.8% 1.803 97.5% Rural Areas 1.085 47.6% 1.246 54.6% 1.387 59.9% 1.464 63.3% 1.509 65.3% Alaskan Villages 0.105 37.8% 0.119 42.9% 0.124 44.4% 0.113 40.7% 0.118 42.4% Urban Areas 0.066 69.2% 0.069 72.9% 0.071 74.1% 0.064 67.2% 0.068 70.9% Rural Areas 0.039 21.4% 0.049 27.2% 0.053 28.8% 0.049 26.8% 0.050 27.5% Federal Reservations 0.521 47.9% 0.583 53.4% 0.637 57.5% 0.678 61.2% 0.707 63.8% Urban Areas 0.246 88.3% 0.254 91.2% 0.267 94.7% 0.270 95.7% 0.276 98.0% Rural Areas 0.276 34.0% 0.329 40.5% 0.371 44.9% 0.408 49.5% 0.431 52.1% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.032 92.1% 0.032 92.2% 0.032 90.8% 0.032 91.6% 0.034 96.3% Urban Areas 0.026 98.9% 0.026 98.9% 0.025 93.9% 0.025 94.0% 0.027 99.9% Rural Areas 0.006 70.0% 0.006 70.7% 0.007 80.9% 0.007 83.9% 0.007 84.6% Tribal Statistical Areas 2.162 79.8% 2.266 83.7% 2.382 87.0% 2.427 88.6% 2.453 89.6% Urban Areas 1.397 97.9% 1.405 98.5% 1.426 98.9% 1.427 99.0% 1.432 99.2% Rural Areas 0.765 59.7% 0.862 67.2% 0.956 73.7% 1.000 77.1% 1.021 78.9% Any Fixed Service and Mobile 5G-NR Service Tribal Lands 3.240 78.9% 3.332 81.1% 3.488 83.8% 3.519 84.6% 3.561 85.6% Urban Areas 1.778 97.4% 1.778 97.4% 1.803 97.7% 1.807 97.9% 1.818 98.4% Rural Areas 1.462 64.1% 1.554 68.1% 1.685 72.8% 1.712 74.0% 1.743 75.4% Alaskan Villages 0.128 46.5% 0.143 51.6% 0.150 53.6% 0.133 47.7% 0.137 49.3% Urban Areas 0.068 71.7% 0.071 75.1% 0.073 76.4% 0.066 68.6% 0.069 72.2% Rural Areas 0.060 33.3% 0.071 39.3% 0.077 41.7% 0.067 36.8% 0.068 37.3% Federal Reservations 0.728 66.9% 0.744 68.3% 0.786 70.9% 0.810 73.2% 0.825 74.5% Urban Areas 0.271 97.3% 0.266 95.5% 0.271 96.1% 0.279 99.1% 0.280 99.4% Rural Areas 0.458 56.4% 0.479 58.9% 0.515 62.3% 0.531 64.3% 0.545 66.0% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.033 94.5% 0.033 94.5% 0.032 93.0% 0.033 93.1% 0.034 97.9% Urban Areas 0.026 99.0% 0.026 99.0% 0.025 94.0% 0.025 94.1% 0.027 99.9% Rural Areas 0.007 80.1% 0.007 79.7% 0.007 89.7% 0.007 89.9% 0.008 91.4% Tribal Statistical Areas 2.351 86.8% 2.412 89.1% 2.520 92.0% 2.543 92.9% 2.564 93.6% Urban Areas 1.414 99.1% 1.414 99.2% 1.434 99.5% 1.437 99.7% 1.442 99.9% Rural Areas 0.937 73.2% 0.998 77.9% 1.086 83.7% 1.106 85.3% 1.122 86.7% Pop. Evaluated 4.108 100.0% 4.109 100.0% 4.160 100.0% 4.159 100.0% 4.161 100.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; FCC BDC, Dec. 2024; FCC BDC, June 2024; FCC BDC, Dec. 2023; FCC BDC, June 2023; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. APPX. A-7 Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps on Tribal Lands (June 30, 2025) Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps and Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Pop. Evaluated Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Tribal Lands 4.161 3.009 72.3% 3.502 84.2% 3.816 91.7% Urban Areas 1.848 1.780 96.3% 1.831 99.1% 1.847 99.9% Rural Areas 2.312 1.229 53.1% 1.671 72.3% 1.969 85.1% Alaskan Villages 0.279 0.147 52.7% 0.175 62.7% 0.207 74.3% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.1% 0.093 97.1% 0.095 99.4% Rural Areas 0.183 0.056 30.6% 0.082 44.7% 0.112 61.2% Federal Reservations 0.279 0.147 52.7% 0.175 62.7% 0.207 74.3% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.1% 0.093 97.1% 0.095 99.4% Rural Areas 0.183 0.056 30.6% 0.082 44.7% 0.112 61.2% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.279 0.147 52.7% 0.175 62.7% 0.207 74.3% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.1% 0.093 97.1% 0.095 99.4% Rural Areas 0.183 0.056 30.6% 0.082 44.7% 0.112 61.2% Tribal Statistical Areas 0.279 0.147 52.7% 0.175 62.7% 0.207 74.3% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.1% 0.093 97.1% 0.095 99.4% Rural Areas 0.183 0.056 30.6% 0.082 44.7% 0.112 61.2% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. APPX. A-8 Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps on Tribal Lands (June 30, 2025) Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps and Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Pop. Evaluated Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Tribal Lands 4.161 3.094 74.4% 3.632 87.3% 4.109 98.8% Urban Areas 1.848 1.781 96.3% 1.831 99.1% 1.848 100.0% Rural Areas 2.312 1.313 56.8% 1.801 77.9% 2.261 97.8% Alaskan Villages 0.279 0.165 59.0% 0.197 70.6% 0.256 91.8% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.4% 0.093 97.5% 0.095 99.8% Rural Areas 0.183 0.074 40.1% 0.104 56.5% 0.161 87.7% Federal Reservations 0.279 0.165 59.0% 0.197 70.6% 0.256 91.8% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.4% 0.093 97.5% 0.095 99.8% Rural Areas 0.183 0.074 40.1% 0.104 56.5% 0.161 87.7% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.279 0.165 59.0% 0.197 70.6% 0.256 91.8% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.4% 0.093 97.5% 0.095 99.8% Rural Areas 0.183 0.074 40.1% 0.104 56.5% 0.161 87.7% Tribal Statistical Areas 0.279 0.165 59.0% 0.197 70.6% 0.256 91.8% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.4% 0.093 97.5% 0.095 99.8% Rural Areas 0.183 0.074 40.1% 0.104 56.5% 0.161 87.7% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. APPX. A-9 Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) on Tribal Lands (June 30, 2025) Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) and Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Pop. Evaluated Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Tribal Lands 4.161 2.519 60.5% 2.831 68.0% 2.974 71.5% Urban Areas 1.848 1.692 91.6% 1.739 94.1% 1.753 94.8% Rural Areas 2.312 0.826 35.7% 1.093 47.2% 1.221 52.8% Alaskan Villages 0.279 0.089 32.0% 0.099 35.5% 0.111 40.0% Urban Areas 0.096 0.059 62.2% 0.060 62.7% 0.061 63.8% Rural Areas 0.183 0.030 16.3% 0.039 21.3% 0.051 27.6% Federal Reservations 0.279 0.089 32.0% 0.099 35.5% 0.111 40.0% Urban Areas 0.096 0.059 62.2% 0.060 62.7% 0.061 63.8% Rural Areas 0.183 0.030 16.3% 0.039 21.3% 0.051 27.6% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.279 0.089 32.0% 0.099 35.5% 0.111 40.0% Urban Areas 0.096 0.059 62.2% 0.060 62.7% 0.061 63.8% Rural Areas 0.183 0.030 16.3% 0.039 21.3% 0.051 27.6% Tribal Statistical Areas 0.279 0.089 32.0% 0.099 35.5% 0.111 40.0% Urban Areas 0.096 0.059 62.2% 0.060 62.7% 0.061 63.8% Rural Areas 0.183 0.030 16.3% 0.039 21.3% 0.051 27.6% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. APPX. A-10 Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) on Tribal Lands (June 30, 2025) Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) and Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Pop. Evaluated Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Tribal Lands 4.161 2.796 67.2% 3.201 76.9% 3.408 81.9% Urban Areas 1.848 1.767 95.6% 1.816 98.3% 1.832 99.1% Rural Areas 2.312 1.028 44.5% 1.385 59.9% 1.576 68.2% Alaskan Villages 0.279 0.136 48.6% 0.155 55.5% 0.179 64.0% Urban Areas 0.096 0.086 90.4% 0.088 92.1% 0.090 94.2% Rural Areas 0.183 0.049 26.8% 0.067 36.5% 0.089 48.3% Federal Reservations 0.279 0.136 48.6% 0.155 55.5% 0.179 64.0% Urban Areas 0.096 0.086 90.4% 0.088 92.1% 0.090 94.2% Rural Areas 0.183 0.049 26.8% 0.067 36.5% 0.089 48.3% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.279 0.136 48.6% 0.155 55.5% 0.179 64.0% Urban Areas 0.096 0.086 90.4% 0.088 92.1% 0.090 94.2% Rural Areas 0.183 0.049 26.8% 0.067 36.5% 0.089 48.3% Tribal Statistical Areas 0.279 0.136 48.6% 0.155 55.5% 0.179 64.0% Urban Areas 0.096 0.086 90.4% 0.088 92.1% 0.090 94.2% Rural Areas 0.183 0.049 26.8% 0.067 36.5% 0.089 48.3% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. APPX. A-11 Availability (Millions) of Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) on Tribal Lands (June 30, 2025) Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) and Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Pop. Evaluated Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Tribal Lands 4.161 3.007 72.3% 3.518 84.5% 3.928 94.4% Urban Areas 1.848 1.777 96.2% 1.828 98.9% 1.844 99.8% Rural Areas 2.312 1.230 53.2% 1.690 73.1% 2.083 90.1% Alaskan Villages 0.279 0.162 57.9% 0.192 68.9% 0.245 87.8% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.0% 0.093 97.1% 0.095 99.3% Rural Areas 0.183 0.071 38.6% 0.099 54.2% 0.150 81.9% Federal Reservations 0.279 0.162 57.9% 0.192 68.9% 0.245 87.8% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.0% 0.093 97.1% 0.095 99.3% Rural Areas 0.183 0.071 38.6% 0.099 54.2% 0.150 81.9% Hawaiian Home Lands 0.279 0.162 57.9% 0.192 68.9% 0.245 87.8% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.0% 0.093 97.1% 0.095 99.3% Rural Areas 0.183 0.071 38.6% 0.099 54.2% 0.150 81.9% Tribal Statistical Areas 0.279 0.162 57.9% 0.192 68.9% 0.245 87.8% Urban Areas 0.096 0.091 95.0% 0.093 97.1% 0.095 99.3% Rural Areas 0.183 0.071 38.6% 0.099 54.2% 0.150 81.9% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census. APPX. A-12 Share of Population with Access to Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps and Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Population First Quartile (Lowest Population) 88.7% 92.2% 95.7% Second Quartile 91.1% 94.1% 97.0% Third Quartile 92.9% 95.6% 98.0% Fourth Quartile (Highest Population) 94.2% 97.0% 99.0% Population Density First Quartile (Lowest Density) 72.2% 81.8% 90.9% Second Quartile 97.7% 98.9% 99.8% Third Quartile 99.0% 99.6% 100.0% Fourth Quartile (Highest Density) 98.9% 99.7% 100.0% Average Per Capita Income ($2024) First Quartile (Lowest Income) 91.4% 94.7% 97.7% Second Quartile 90.2% 93.6% 96.9% Third Quartile 92.3% 95.5% 97.9% Fourth Quartile (Highest Income) 96.3% 97.9% 99.0% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020-2024). APPX. A-13 Share of Population with Access to Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps and Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Population First Quartile (Lowest Population) 90.8% 94.6% 99.1% Second Quartile 92.7% 95.9% 99.5% Third Quartile 94.1% 96.9% 99.7% Fourth Quartile (Highest Population) 94.9% 97.7% 99.9% Population Density First Quartile (Lowest Density) 77.2% 87.3% 98.5% Second Quartile 97.9% 99.1% 100.0% Third Quartile 99.0% 99.6% 100.0% Fourth Quartile (Highest Density) 98.9% 99.7% 100.0% Average Per Capita Income ($2024) First Quartile (Lowest Income) 92.6% 96.0% 99.5% Second Quartile 91.9% 95.5% 99.5% Third Quartile 93.5% 96.8% 99.7% Fourth Quartile (Highest Income) 96.9% 98.6% 99.9% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020-2024). APPX. A-14 Share of Population with Access to Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 35/3 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) and Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Population First Quartile (Lowest Population) 77.3% 79.6% 81.0% Second Quartile 80.3% 82.3% 83.4% Third Quartile 82.5% 84.4% 85.4% Fourth Quartile (Highest Population) 84.7% 86.8% 87.9% Population Density First Quartile (Lowest Density) 46.3% 52.3% 55.9% Second Quartile 87.5% 88.7% 89.3% Third Quartile 94.5% 95.2% 95.5% Fourth Quartile (Highest Density) 96.7% 97.6% 97.8% Average Per Capita Income ($2024) First Quartile (Lowest Income) 83.6% 86.1% 87.6% Second Quartile 79.0% 81.2% 82.6% Third Quartile 81.4% 83.5% 84.6% Fourth Quartile (Highest Income) 85.5% 86.8% 87.3% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020-2024). APPX. A-15 Share of Population with Access to Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) Mobile 5G-NR Services of at Least 7/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) and Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Population First Quartile (Lowest Population) 83.0% 85.8% 87.7% Second Quartile 86.0% 88.4% 90.0% Third Quartile 88.4% 90.6% 92.1% Fourth Quartile (Highest Population) 90.7% 93.2% 94.6% Population Density First Quartile (Lowest Density) 57.2% 64.8% 70.1% Second Quartile 94.8% 96.0% 96.8% Third Quartile 98.4% 99.0% 99.4% Fourth Quartile (Highest Density) 98.7% 99.5% 99.8% Average Per Capita Income ($2024) First Quartile (Lowest Income) 87.9% 90.8% 92.8% Second Quartile 84.6% 87.3% 89.3% Third Quartile 87.6% 90.1% 91.7% Fourth Quartile (Highest Income) 92.6% 94.1% 94.9% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020-2024). APPX. A-16 Share of Population with Access to Fixed Services of at Least 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) by Census Block Group Demographics (June 30, 2025) Mobile 4G LTE Services of at Least 5/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) and Fixed Wireline Service Fixed Terrestrial Service Any Fixed Service Population First Quartile (Lowest Population) 87.7% 91.2% 94.5% Second Quartile 90.0% 93.0% 95.6% Third Quartile 91.8% 94.4% 96.5% Fourth Quartile (Highest Population) 93.1% 95.8% 97.6% Population Density First Quartile (Lowest Density) 68.8% 78.0% 86.3% Second Quartile 96.7% 97.9% 98.7% Third Quartile 98.8% 99.5% 99.9% Fourth Quartile (Highest Density) 98.9% 99.7% 100.0% Average Per Capita Income ($2024) First Quartile (Lowest Income) 90.8% 94.1% 96.9% Second Quartile 89.0% 92.4% 95.3% Third Quartile 91.1% 94.1% 96.3% Fourth Quartile (Highest Income) 94.9% 96.5% 97.5% Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020-2024). APPX. A-17 Comparison of Demographic Data Between Areas With and Without Fixed Services of 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at least 7/1 Mbps (June 30, 2025) Population Population Density Per Capita Income ($2024) United States - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,448.2*** 6,954.7*** $43,462.60*** Unserved 1,197.9 103.1 $37,565.80 United States - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,453.4*** 7,441.9*** $43,934.98*** Unserved 1,277.1 458.4 $37,544.33 United States - Any Fixed Services Served 1,451.3*** 7,726.4*** $44,324.95*** Unserved 1,332.4 1,324.7 $37,842.92 Urban Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,467.1 8,088.9*** $44,375.62*** Unserved 1,420.2 894.2 $54,122.31 Urban Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,466.6 8,210.2*** $44,533.46*** Unserved 1,474.0 2,661.1 $40,759.30 Urban Areas - Any Fixed Services Served 1,461.7*** 8,280.0*** $44,776.92*** Unserved 1,535.2 4,969.1 $39,603.65 Rural Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,336.7*** 280.5*** $38,096.62*** Unserved 1,186.6 63.0 $36,744.72 Rural Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,331.8*** 365.4*** $38,424.33*** Unserved 1,244.2 91.0 $37,038.22 Rural Areas - Any Fixed Services Served 1,314.3*** 453.2*** $38,389.45*** Unserved 1,264.6 106.6 $37,278.73 Tribal Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,293.7*** 1,513.0*** $33,563.46*** Unserved 1,196.2 67.3 $28,471.87 Tribal Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,289.1 1,837.9*** $33,918.57*** Unserved 1,247.6 159.2 $30,143.74 Tribal Areas - Any Fixed Service Served 1,270.1 2,258.7*** $34,207.85*** Unserved 1,277.2 249.7 $30,954.87 Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020-2024). APPX. A-18 Comparison of Demographic Data Between Areas With and Without Fixed Services of 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at least 5/1 Mbps (June 30, 2025) Population Population Density Per Capita Income ($2024) United States - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,432.3*** 6,457.0*** $43,070.81*** Unserved 1,083.2 88.7 $35,667.16 United States - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,446.7*** 7,161.4*** $43,803.27*** Unserved 1,276.8 535.0 $36,727.75 United States - Any Fixed Services Served 1,445.6*** 7,469.7*** $44,209.10*** Unserved 1,339.5 1,488.0 $37,387.61 Urban Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,466.9 8,052.0*** $44,429.08 Unserved 1,309.3 2,313.4 $45,106.12 Urban Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,466.7 8,173.9*** $44,595.28*** Unserved 1,473.5 3,030.6 $37,326.70 Urban Areas - Any Fixed Services Served 1,461.7*** 8,243.9*** $44,837.58*** Unserved 1,539.9 5,257.2 $38,323.72 Rural Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,296.6*** 209.8*** $37,764.65*** Unserved 1,077.7 34.3 $35,446.94 Rural Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,310.9*** 294.6*** $38,440.49*** Unserved 1,241.6 88.2 $36,627.52 Rural Areas - Any Fixed Services Served 1,296.8*** 349.5*** $38,436.09*** Unserved 1,266.0 105.8 $37,059.20 Tribal Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,281.3** 1,278.2*** $32,789.92*** Unserved 1,123.1 13.1 $27,163.86 Tribal Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,282.7 1,705.1*** $33,735.36*** Unserved 1,254.5 163.4 $29,905.77 Tribal Areas - Any Fixed Service Served 1,268.9 2,118.2*** $33,985.46*** Unserved 1,279.0 254.4 $30,958.69 Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020-2024). APPX. A-19 Comparison of Demographic Data Between Areas With and Without Fixed Services of 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at least 35/3 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) (June 30, 2025) Population Population Density Per Capita Income ($2024) United States - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,423.3 9,044.2*** $42,382.46*** Unserved 1,429.1 1,374.3 $43,909.95 United States - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,422.8 9,223.4*** $42,521.99*** Unserved 1,429.7 1,451.9 $43,603.29 United States - Any Fixed Services Served 1,417.9*** 9,363.6*** $42,750.11*** Unserved 1,436.4 1,850.8 $43,182.40 Urban Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,429.6*** 9,397.5*** $42,644.53*** Unserved 1,610.3 2,852.3 $51,294.27 Urban Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,428.5*** 9,511.2*** $42,749.71*** Unserved 1,600.8 2,942.2 $50,329.55 Urban Areas - Any Fixed Services Served 1,422.9*** 9,568.9*** $42,929.13*** Unserved 1,595.3 3,599.1 $48,866.68 Rural Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,272.4 597.8*** $36,054.05*** Unserved 1,277.9 140.0 $37,759.62 Rural Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,253.8* 677.1*** $35,700.55*** Unserved 1,279.6 144.5 $37,749.60 Rural Areas - Any Fixed Services Served 1,206.2*** 815.7*** $35,249.42*** Unserved 1,282.1 151.8 $37,716.69 Tribal Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,265.6 2,420.4*** $33,943.28*** Unserved 1,279.9 306.7 $31,451.29 Tribal Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,272.6 2,517.6*** $34,254.37*** Unserved 1,274.5 342.0 $31,361.27 Tribal Areas - Any Fixed Service Served 1,256.0 2,797.1*** $34,578.80*** Unserved 1,283.0 396.5 $31,454.78 Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020-2024). APPX. A-20 Comparison of Demographic Data Between Areas With and Without Fixed Services of 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 5G-NR Services of at least 7/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) (June 30, 2025) Population Population Density Per Capita Income ($2024) United States - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,450.2*** 7,929.7*** $43,409.41*** Unserved 1,334.0 439.2 $41,143.17 United States - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,451.2*** 8,166.4*** $43,622.95*** Unserved 1,345.0 628.4 $40,745.82 United States - Any Fixed Services Served 1,446.7*** 8,355.0*** $43,928.85*** Unserved 1,372.1 1,279.3 $40,397.06 Urban Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,459.9*** 8,471.1*** $43,824.82*** Unserved 1,572.8 1,577.3 $53,683.57 Urban Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,459.2*** 8,582.8*** $43,959.45*** Unserved 1,552.4 2,056.3 $49,803.90 Urban Areas - Any Fixed Services Served 1,453.9*** 8,647.5*** $44,184.76*** Unserved 1,561.6 3,644.9 $46,272.98 Rural Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,315.4*** 456.6*** $37,652.06 Unserved 1,264.9 110.1 $37,530.54 Rural Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,305.1*** 535.2*** $37,433.60 Unserved 1,271.1 120.0 $37,587.24 Rural Areas - Any Fixed Services Served 1,256.9* 665.3*** $37,184.64 Unserved 1,280.0 130.3 $37,610.73 Tribal Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,272.2 2,011.4*** $33,558.47*** Unserved 1,275.9 100.3 $31,068.49 Tribal Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,273.4 2,165.8*** $33,926.37*** Unserved 1,274.2 166.3 $30,970.65 Tribal Areas - Any Fixed Service Served 1,253.5 2,525.1*** $34,193.03*** Unserved 1,288.8 250.9 $31,287.81 Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020-2024). APPX. A-21 Comparison of Demographic Data Between Areas With and Without Fixed Services of 100/20 Mbps and Mobile 4G LTE Services of at least 5/1 Mbps (In-Vehicle Mobile) (June 30, 2025) Population Population Density Per Capita Income ($2024) United States - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,443.9*** 7,356.7*** $43,337.20*** Unserved 1,315.3 245.5 $40,487.72 United States - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,447.9*** 7,743.5*** $43,729.71*** Unserved 1,332.5 500.8 $39,585.92 United States - Any Fixed Services Served 1,445.0*** 8,004.3*** $44,085.33*** Unserved 1,366.0 1,261.1 $39,374.75 Urban Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,461.8*** 8,237.9*** $44,124.67*** Unserved 1,648.7 1,185.8 $55,411.45 Urban Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,461.1*** 8,362.1*** $44,272.06*** Unserved 1,576.5 2,092.4 $47,508.50 Urban Areas - Any Fixed Services Served 1,455.9*** 8,434.5*** $44,501.65*** Unserved 1,577.3 4,153.1 $43,677.63 Rural Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,301.3*** 334.8*** $37,056.02*** Unserved 1,258.6 85.6 $37,947.28 Rural Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,291.6*** 423.2*** $37,304.02 Unserved 1,271.4 102.2 $37,662.42 Rural Areas - Any Fixed Services Served 1,255.2*** 537.4*** $36,854.11*** Unserved 1,282.3 115.2 $37,722.41 Tribal Areas - Fixed Wireline Services Served 1,290.6** 1,598.4*** $33,028.72** Unserved 1,222.3 53.5 $30,978.41 Tribal Areas - Fixed Terrestrial Services Served 1,283.9 1,918.6*** $33,806.40*** Unserved 1,258.4 153.2 $30,576.98 Tribal Areas - Any Fixed Service Served 1,264.9 2,313.3*** $34,041.83*** Unserved 1,281.7 245.9 $31,175.02 Source: FCC BDC, June 2025; Staff Block Estimates; 2020 Census; ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020-2024). STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN BRENDAN CARR Re: Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, GN Docket No. 25-223, 2026 Section 706 Report (Aug. 14, 2026). Today’s Section 706 Report shows that President Trump’s policies and the Commission’s Build America agenda are delivering real results for the American people. More Americans than ever have access to affordable, next-gen services. The digital divide is rapidly closing. And a range of data sets show that speeds are up, prices are down, and competition is intensifying. This report also gets the Commission back to what Congress directed us to do under Section 706: to determine “whether advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion.” By returning to that straightforward directive, we are able to better evaluate whether new deployments across a range of technologies are delivering meaningful results for Americans. The numbers speak for themselves. Today, almost 95% of American homes and businesses are covered by 5G at 35/3 Mbps speeds. The percentage of rural Americans lacking access to 100/20 Mbps fixed terrestrial broadband service decreased by over 44% since the last 706 Report. After factoring in satellite, rural broadband deployment is approaching universal availability. Competition is also growing. As of June 2025, 77% of Americans have access to three or more fixed services at 100/20 Mbps. Other data show that our policies are also having a big impact on pricing and speeds. Actual prices for wireless service have now fallen four times more during President Trump’s first 18 months in office compared to the same time under President Biden. Between late 2024 to early 2026, fixed wireless upload speeds increased by 36.9%, while download speeds rose by 25.1%. Despite the tremendous progress we have made so far, there is more work to do. The Commission will continue to remove regulatory barriers and encourage new builds. We have streamlined the process to transition from outdated copper lines to high-speed, reliable networks. We’ll continue to deliver on President Trump’s spectrum pipeline plan by executing spectrum auctions and approving secondary market transactions. These Build America agenda initiatives are integral to unleashing fast, affordable broadband nationwide. Thank you to staff for their hard work on this item, including AJ Burton, Jodie May, Ed Krachmer, Raphael Sznajder, Joseph Calascione, Rick Mallen, Derek Yeo, Barbara Esbin, Matt Warner, Garnet Hanly, Susannah Larson, Kerry Murray, Stephanie Neville, Amanda Betag, Judith Dempsey, Cole Campbell, Mack Wachala, Molly Schwarz, and Steve Kauffman. STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER ANNA GOMEZ Re: Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, GN Docket No. 25-223, 2026 Section 706 Report (August 14, 2026). Today, Americans rely on broadband connectivity for work, education, healthcare, community and civic engagement, entertainment, accessing government services, and so much more. Advancements in technology such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) provide significant economic opportunity. When used responsibly, AI has the ability to increase efficiency and productivity for individuals and businesses alike. The consensus about the need to embrace AI has led to overwhelming bipartisan agreement that the United States should become a leader in its advancement.  However, access to affordable, reliable high-speed, low-latency broadband is the foundation for access to AI. Without this essential connectivity, communities in rural areas, tribal lands, and low-income neighborhoods that already have the fewest educational resources, the weakest public health systems, and subpar public infrastructure, will be left further behind. That digital divide stifles economic opportunity and perpetuates a cycle of inequality. That is unacceptable. Affordable, reliable, high-speed connectivity for all is essential to American leadership in the global AI economy. New artificial intelligence applications being developed will need latency below 30 ms Nokia, Build First, Lead Forever: Why AI Infrastructure is America’s Next Advantage, https://www.nokia.com/asset/215238/ (Build First, Lead Forever) (last visited Aug. 11, 2026). and greater uplink capacities to allow for real-time data flow. Id. Government efforts to support broadband deployment should be focused on how we can best meet these needs and prepare the nation for success in the years to come. In Section 706 of the Communications Act, Congress tasked the Commission with reporting annually on “the availability of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans” and on “whether advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion.” 47 U.S.C. § 1302(b). Availability of advanced telecommunications capability depends on more than just whether infrastructure has been deployed. Infrastructure is of little value to consumers when it is not usable for high-speed, reliable connectivity or when it is not affordable. Though Congress only required the Commission to report on deployment, this requirement is a floor, not a ceiling. Its purpose is to inform Congress on the state of broadband connectivity across the country. The report at hand covers only infrastructure deployment and consequently does not address other important pieces of the puzzle, affordability and usability, which tie directly into the purpose of broadband deployment: ensuring that everyone is connected. Omitting affordability and usability from the analysis was a policy decision with which I disagree. For satellite broadband specifically, usability presents significant concerns. Thus, it is misleading to state that 99.7% of the U.S. population has access to satellite broadband at 100/20 Mbps. While satellite service is widely available to most Americans, its usability is limited by physical obstructions to the line of sight, Shira Ovide, The Washington Post, Elon Musk’s Starlink internet works great if hardly anyone uses it (July 18, 2025), https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/07/18/starlink-internet-satellite-speed-elon-musk/ (Washington Post Satellite Speed); Federal Communications Commission, Getting Broadband Q&A, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/getting-broadband-qa (last visited Aug. 13, 2026) (FCC Consumer Guide). capacity constraints in areas with high demand, Sacha Meinrath et al., X-Lab, Starlink Capacity Analysis v0.2 (July 28, 2025), https://thexlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Starlink_Analysis_Working_Paper_v0.2.pdf (Starlink Capacity Analysis v0.2); Omar Gallaa, CNET, Some Starlink Customers Report Getting Hit With Massive Demand Surcharge (July 15, 2026), https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/starlink-customers-report-demand-surcharges/ (July 2026 CNET Starlink Surcharge); Starlink, What is a Demand Surcharge?, https://starlink.com/sb/support/article/63d885d3-c269-21f9-69d6-3ed1b2fd18e9 (last visited Aug. 13, 2026) (Starlink Demand Surcharge Webpage). and network congestion that can result in slower speeds. Starlink, Starlink Specifications, https://starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1470-99699-90 (last visited Aug. 13, 2026) (Starlink Specifications). In 2025, fewer than half of satellite broadband users actually experienced speeds of 100/20 Mbps. Sue Marek, Ookla, Starlink Hits New Highs in the U.S. (May 5, 2026), https://www.ookla.com/articles/starlink-hits-new-us-highs. Satellite users in fewer than half of the states were able to get median upload speeds of 20 Mbps. Id. Users typically experience download speeds between 45 and 280 Mbps and upload speeds between 10 and 30 Mbps. Starlink Specifications. In terms of performance, satellite service falls behind major fiber and cable operators in rural and urban areas and behind most fixed wireless providers in rural areas. Fiona Armstrong-Mills, OpenSignal, Is Starlink a scalable fix for U.S. digital inclusion or an access band-aid? (April 15, 2026), https://insights.opensignal.com/2026/04/is-starlink-a-scalable-fix-for-us-digital-inclusion-or-an-access-band-aid/dt. As acknowledged by industry, service reliability declines during periods of congestion and actual speeds depend on location, time of day, and type of service plan. Starlink Specifications. As demand for satellite connectivity grows, capacity limitations also become more apparent. In areas of the country where population density exceeds 6.66 households per square mile, satellite may not provide service at 100/20 Mbps. Starlink Capacity Analysis v0.2. Such low subscriber density is not reflective of the entire country. Rysavy Research, Broadband Comparison: Fiber, Cable, Wireless, and Satellite (July 21, 2025), https://rysavy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2025-07-rysavy-broadband-comparison.pdf. Perhaps more concerning is the fact that satellite capacity limitations may raise costs for consumers. In areas with a high density of users, service providers have imposed one-time network demand fees of up to $1,500 affecting new customers and those locating to the higher-demand areas. July 2026 CNET Starlink Surcharge; Starlink Demand Surcharge Webpage. Satellite broadband service also requires a clear line of sight between the user’s device and the provider’s satellite, FCC Consumer Guide. meaning that physical obstructions such as buildings, trees, and poles make connectivity more challenging. Washington Post Satellite Speed. In remote areas including Alaska, typical latency is over 100 ms, Starlink Specifications. which exceeds the 30 ms latency benchmark that has been identified as optimal for most artificial intelligence applications that are being developed. Build First, Lead Forever. This report also abolishes without replacement the future benchmark of 1,000/500 Mbps for broadband speed established in the 2024 Section 706 Report, arguing that future benchmarks may violate the Commission’s obligation to remain technologically neutral. Lowering standards to ensure certain technologies can meet a benchmark is the opposite of technological neutrality. Technological neutrality requires that we evaluate all technologies against the same standard and support the ones that perform best. We need not lower the standards or get rid of them entirely to allow certain technologies to flourish despite their shortfalls. Moreover, in the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) Report and Order, the Commission established 1,000/500 Mbps as the standard for the Gigabit performance tier. 47 CFR § 54.805(b)(3). More than 85% of RDOF winners have already committed to provide gigabit speed service. Universal Service Administrative Co., Rural Digital Opportunity Fund, https://www.usac.org/high-cost/funds/rural-digital-opportunity-fund/ (last visited Aug. 13, 2026). If this is the standard that funding awardees are held to, other providers should be working towards providing service at the same speeds. The Commission should be uplifting and supporting the use of technologies that provide affordable, reliable, high-speed connectivity that meets the needs of today and tomorrow. The report correctly concludes that our work closing the digital divide is not done. Challenges to service quality, capacity, and affordability still exist, providing a clear indication that there is more work to be done. The Commission’s programs, including those under the Universal Service Fund, continue to be essential for ensuring that everyone across our nation has access to affordable, reliable, high-speed connectivity. I thank the Chairman’s office and the Wireline Competition Bureau for their work on this item and for working with me to implement edits that identify some of the usability limitations of satellite broadband service. However, because I believe that any inquiry into the availability of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans should include a discussion of affordability and usability, I respectfully concur. STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER OLIVIA TRUSTY Re: Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, GN Docket No. 25-223, 2026 Section 706 Report (Aug. 14, 2026). We’ve all heard the saying: “It’s a marathon, not a sprint.” In other words, we must avoid becoming so fixated on the short term that we risk our ability to achieve long-term goals. When it comes to universal broadband connectivity, I believe it is both a marathon and a sprint. Broadband is essential to modern life and we can’t allow Americans to linger unconnected. At the same time, the nation requires networks with the ability to meet both present and future needs, particularly when it comes to the performance, reliability, and resiliency demanded by artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies. When section 706 was originally enacted in 1996, broadband was in its infancy. Today, the marketplace is more advanced and policymaking is more complex. While the section 706 review once was the centerpiece of the FCC’s broadband analysis, today Congress has situated it as one part of a broader marketplace inquiry in section 13 of the Act. And the broadband mapping information required by the Broadband DATA Act, along with the Broadband Funding Map established pursuant to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, play a direct role in policymaking without being filtered through the lens of the section 706 inquiry. Our section 706 report still has a part to play, but we must be mindful of its limited scope in the Commission’s broader data-driven efforts. As I’ve focused on broadband deployment over the course of our section 706 proceeding, what is my key take-away? When it comes to advancing both our short-term needs and longer-term goals, the Commission is not running this race alone. President Trump and leaders in Congress reinstated the Commission’s spectrum auction authority helping the FCC restore U.S. leadership in advanced communications technology. And the President has set America on a path for leadership in AI. Under Chairman Carr’s leadership, the Build America Agenda is working to reduce the cost and timing of broadband deployment, speed FCC licensing and approval processes, and ensure our universal service programs target funds where they are needed and work in harmony with broadband funding from our partner federal agencies. And a bipartisan, bicameral working group in Congress is considering how to modernize universal service to be successful into the future. On recent trips to Nebraska, New Mexico, and North Dakota I met with military, state, and local leaders and public safety stakeholders, and rural and Tribal broadband providers who are working together to expand connectivity in their communities. And finally, I want to highlight the hard-working FCC staff who prepare the analyses that inform our policymaking, who develop new regulatory approaches that can enable the FCC to meet the broadband challenges before us, and who are working every day to implement those policies. In light of these considerations, I support this latest Section 706 Report and its conclusion that broadband is being deployed in a reasonable and timely fashion, along with the FCC’s data-driven policymaking across many different proceedings. I thank the Wireline Competition Bureau, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, the Office of Economics and Analytics, and the Space Bureau for their excellent work on this item. And I thank all the Commission staff working to help us achieve universal connectivity.